₦airaland Forum

HallaDaTruth:
Many will not understand

Righteousness89:
The Conspiracy to take out Donald Trump is a Combined conspiracy..
The Fact is Trump is not the target!
The Target is you!
Trump has been the Bone on their Neck!
Like I have always said, the Trump Presidency is Period of Mercy for the USA and the World at Large..
The "B" System technology is in Place..
Other top notch Preparations are also in Place..
They are in a Haste to come in..

The Trump of GOD is the Trigger!
Buckle up Folks! Settle your Salvation with JESUS Christ
There is No more time!!

nwaezeemmanuel:
Well said. This will give a lot of people a clearer picture.

nwaezeemmanuel:
Was waiting to see this. Skinny doesn't have to mean zero curves

Alexgman1:
As we all know, there are two types of women:

The skinny women and The curvy women.

Curvy women has breast, hip, butt thigh, etc and their ratio in comparison to waistlines and other parts of the body. With this in mind, curvy is no synonymous to overweight.

Skinny women on the other hand are thin and are low in fat. They are direct opposite of curvy woman.

See photos of extraordinary curvy and skinny women below.

realestniggah:
Hahahaha

8y88y8:
Coming from a fool who has never left his father's untarred village road

PHILipu1:
Trump asked his supporters not to vote by mail and I believe it was a mistake.

The physical votes were counted first and he was leading and the mail votes counted later and he lost.

No cheating there.

June 28, 2010, Clinton commemorated late Sen. Byrd by saying, “Today our country has lost a true American original, my friend and mentor Robert C. Byrd."

At the senator's eulogy in 2005, Joe Biden described Byrd as "fiercely devoted to his principles," a "friend," "mentor" and a "guide."

"Accuse the other side of that which you are guilty." — Josef Goebbels, Nazi propaganda minister

The Democrat governor of Virginia, who is a pediatric neurologist, said on a radio show that, essentially, once a baby is born the mother should have the right to decide to keep it alive or to kill it.

But here is the weird thing: That was not what got him in trouble with his Democrat base. They were not cool with that; many liberal elite Democrats think abortion should be legal all the way to when you send your kid to boarding school. What Gov. Ralph Northam is in trouble for is a picture that surfaced in a 1984 yearbook of him dressed for a costume party in blackface or a KKK robe and hood.

Yes, the anti-civil rights Democrat Party of slavery, Jim Crow laws, Democrat KKK senator and Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black, George Wallace, Sen. Robert "KKK" Byrd and Harry Reid has no tolerance for anyone who might have acted like a knucklehead 30 years ago.

In fact, Sen. Robert Byrd of West Virginia was a high-ranking officer in both the Democrat Party (Senate majority leader) and in the KKK (head of recruiting). He not only had a sheet, he merited a fitted sheet, perhaps 400-thread count. In his defense, Byrd, who used the "N" word in an interview, later admitted he was dyslexic; he was unable to distinguish joining the KKK, because he thought it was the KKK.

In the politics of today, a racist can only be an opponent of Democrats, and one who cannot be accused of sexual "misconduct."

As we learned from the Kavanaugh hearings, if anyone makes a claim of sexual misconduct or racist behavior, we must believe him or her. Because of the current Democrat dogma, if you just question the story, you hate women or are a racist yourself.

To be a Democrat today, you must be a victim, either real or imagined, because Dems need victims to fuel their party. They play the victim card so often it is all 52 cards in their deck.

The more successful America is, the less Democrats are needed. They let illegal immigrants in so as to convince them they are victims too and to serve as a new source of aggrieved voters. Dems do not want things to get better because they are not needed when things are going well. They root against "Make America Great Again" on that premise. Name a city where Democrats have been in charge for decades, and I will show you a crime-ridden, highly taxed, corrupt mess of a city.

There is one telling thing about the recently elected governor of Virginia. He won a fairly close race against Republican Ed Gillespie, but this yearbook story never came out. The Democrats' playbook is filled with opposition research like Fusion GPS and Kavanaugh/Clarence Thomas-like dirty tricks. Why didn't the GOP find out about this racist picture before the election? And why did Democrats, wanting their African-American Virginia lieutenant governor to replace this current Democrat governor, just happen to find it now? Because winning in politics is everything to Democrats. They will stoop as low as it takes to win. Compared to entrenched Democrat operatives, Republicans remain naïve about dirty tricks.

Leftists in Hollywood think their only KKK is Khloe, Kim and Kourtney. The KKK membership drive those sisters undertake in Los Angeles could not be more different from the one the KKK did in Mississippi.

Contact Ron Hart, a libertarian op-ed humorist, at Ron@RonaldHart.com or @RonaldHart on Twitter.

kingthreat:
Fear the Media. They are ready to make Saddam Hussein become a saint if he actually dances to their controllers tune.
True news like this was never broadcasted to Blacks in America who unfortunately dont think dep

This year marks the 25-year anniversary of the passage of the most sweeping crime bill in U.S. history—the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, also known as the crime bill. In many ways, this 350-page bill’s passage characterized the bipartisan tough-on-crime movement of the late 20th century. While the bill contained a handful of positive provisions such as increased accountability for law enforcement and new protections for survivors of domestic violence and sexual assault, it was also responsible for exacerbating racial disparities in criminal justice involvement.

As previous CAP work has pointed out, the bill contributed to ongoing rampant police misconduct and racial profiling by deploying hundreds of thousands of officers into neighborhoods of color, and it jeopardized reentry for returning people of color by eliminating their Pell Grant eligibility while in prison. The bill also expanded the use of the death penalty; imposed mandatory life sentences for individuals with three or more felony convictions; and levied harsh new penalties for justice-involved youth. Many of these harmful provisions remain in effect today and continue to target and destabilize communities of color. Here are three ways the 1994 crime bill continues to undermine the safety and well-being of communities of color:

1. Authorized the death penalty for 60 new federal offenses
Known as a “direct descendant of lynching,” the death penalty has always targeted and terrorized black and Latinx communities. The crime bill’s Federal Death Penalty Act permitted the use of the death penalty for 60 new federal offenses, including certain drug offences not related to a homicide. In the five years following the bill’s passage, 74 percent of defendants with death penalty recommendations from federal prosecutors were people of color. Notably, 44 percent were black and 21 percent were Hispanic.

Racial disparities in capital punishment persist to this day. While black and Hispanic people represent just 31 percent of the U.S. population, they represent 53 percent of death row inmates, at 41.9 percent and 11.3 percent, respectively. Furthermore, the death penalty is more likely to be recommended when the victim of the crime is white rather than black, despite the fact that black men are the most likely victims of homicide. Last year, the Trump administration called upon federal prosecutors to pursue the death penalty in cases “dealing in extremely large quantities of drugs.” If this directive survives litigation, it is expected to worsen racial disparities in the application of the death penalty, as black people are far more likely than white people to be arrested, charged, convicted, and incarcerated for drug crimes—even though they use and sell drugs at similar rates.

2. Imposed mandatory life sentences for individuals with three or more felony convictions
The crime bill implemented a rash of new three-strikes laws—laws that impose automatic life sentences for people convicted of certain felony offenses if they already have two convictions on their record. Dozens of states followed suit and enacted three-strikes laws, resulting in a ballooning of the incarceration rate in certain states, especially for black and Latinx Americans.

Imposing life sentences simply because an individual has a criminal record disproportionately targets people of color, who are more likely to have a record in the first place because of unequal contact with police and the justice system. Harsh collateral consequences limit employment opportunities for returning people, especially people of color, and increase the likelihood of recidivism. The crime bill’s three-strikes provision sent thousands of Americans to prison for life based on previous offenses for minor crimes such as stealing loose change from a parked car. In 2016, 78.5 percent of Americans serving life sentences in federal prison were people of color.

Some states have recognized the damage and disproportionate effect that three-strikes sentencing has on communities of color, especially black communities, and have undergone major reform efforts. In California, for instance, black people were 12 times more likely than white people to be incarcerated under three-strikes laws until the state passed the Three Strikes Reform Act of 2012. This act amended the law to require one’s third strike to be a series or violent felony and allowed those currently serving three-strikes sentences to petition the courts for a reduction of their term. However, 28 states still have a three-strikes sentence on the books. In Maryland, Mississippi, and Louisiana, black people alone constitute approximately three-quarters of those sentenced to life in prison. While the federal government recently replaced its mandatory life sentence with a 25-year minimum sentence, it neglected to apply this change retroactively, meaning that hundreds of Americans will die in prison as a result of the three-strikes law.

3. Levied harsh new penalties for justice-involved youth
The crime bill also expanded the school-to-prison pipeline and increased racial disparities in juvenile justice involvement by creating draconian penalties for so-called super predators—low-income children of color, especially black children, who are convicted of multiple crimes.

Among other things, the crime bill allowed prosecutors to charge 13-year-old children as adults for certain crimes. As a result, today, two-thirds of Americans who were sentenced to life in prison as juveniles are black. Juveniles of color also constitute a majority of cases that are transferred to adult criminal court, regardless of the offense category.

Additionally, the bill included an increase in funding for school resource officers (SROs). These school-based, licensed police officers can make arrests and are sometimes armed, depending on local jurisdictions. This increase exacerbated the school-to-prison pipeline for black children, as SROs are twice as likely to discipline black students compared with white students.

The bill also called for sentencing enhancements for youth who are convicted of certain offenses and believed to be associated with gangs. However, while white youth represent a significant portion of self-identified gang members, at 40 percent, law enforcement report that more than 90 percent of gang members are people of color. As a result, police and prosecutors are more likely to target people of color for suspected gang association.

Conclusion
The legacy of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 continues to harm communities of color. It is past time for lawmakers to dismantle these harmful policies and enact comprehensive public safety solutions that reduce reliance on incarceration, prevent unnecessary criminalization, and eliminate the draconian laws keeping millions of Americans in prison.

Righteousness89:

“Blacks are right to think something is terribly wrong,” he said on that occasion, “… when there are more African American men in our correction system than in our colleges; when almost one in three African American men, in their twenties, are either in jail, on parole, or otherwise under the supervision of the criminal system. Nearly one in three.”

milehigh06:
Prove it..bloody liar...Trump has filed multiple cases and non has to do with voter fraud cis they can't prove it
...abi you know pass him lawyers?

Only case he won has to do with how close the observers are to the poll workers...the state stipulated 10ft but they wanted closer and the court reduced it to 6ft...not one case of voter fraud has been brought.....

kelvindj98:
Pele o election observer

chris51:
What do you mean by voters fraud?
What will happen to 102 million votes casted before election?

This is the US system. They have early votes which they start counting on election day.

Unfortunately for Trump, many early voters are Democrats supporters who do not want to take chances by waiting till election day before voting.

samento:
You talk or type nonesence, How do you know there is fraud in this election. You think America is Nigeria where anything and everything goes?

freshMallam1122:
my. governor is udom Emmanuel. my president died long time ago..so is trump gonna rule you or deathly buhari

freshMallam1122:
see black man with black sence.....then make him yr president in yr family compound..so we can hear word on nairaland

Davash222:
You want Tinubu to unleash War on Sanwo Olu.

PDSI:
In the history Oshey! Methuselah Offspring.
Unprecedented? Like you have witnessed the whole 58 elections of the country...

Alaye calm down, you're sounding emotional... Or did you bet

backbone503:
Stop peddling unsubstantiated lies. Trump and his Republican party are yet to come forward with any proves of electoral fraud. Maybe you can help them out.

proffemi:
You need to understand how the US electoral system works. EVERYTHING can be traced, can be checked. Any contestants has the right to challenge results they don't like. This is how America has always worked. Trump has a right, even a responsibility to challenge the votes where he see's evidence of fraud.

What no responsible citizen should do is to undermine confidence in the electoral process itself or instigate violent responses. Unfortunately, this is what Trump (and by extension, people like you) are doing.

Tone down the rhetoric and let the US electoral system do its work. Specious allegations, inflammatory rhetoric: these are more likely to result in the destruction of the Republic than a more accurate vote count.

Nice day to you.