ParisLove2's Posts
Nairaland Forum › ParisLove2's Profile › ParisLove2's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 (of 12 pages)
drhappy: @Paris-Love:It is rather pathetic that you don't even have a good grasp of the quran that you profess. Most of your above submissions are obviously contradictory.I know the truth and the truth had made me free. I was born into Islam and my eyes was opened to the bondage and attempted imitation of Christianity by Mohammed. I did not need anybody to tell me that Islam can never be the way to heaven. All those wanton satisfaction of your prophet's insatiable lusts should be a pointer. My prayer is for God to have His mercy on you too and open your eyes to the gospel truth. Being born-again is a miracle and not explainable as it is beyond the imagination of man and that's what makes it a miracle. You cannot fight God battle for Him with physical arms or might so I cease to continue in this discourse. Wishing you all the best.i think there must be a mistake somewhere. Am not a jihadist ![]() |
Very hypocritical coming from a man who had more than 13 wives. Do unto others(daughters) as you would have them do unto yours(own daughters) Salam ![]() |
Muhammad married Ayesha when she was 6- years old and had sêx with her when she was 9-years-old. How could a 54 year-old man calling himself the messenger God have sèxual feelings for a 9- year-old girl? |
Logicboy03: The foolish mind of a brainwashed christian.No need to start throwing insults. Why are you insulting me cus i said you might be gay? Is being gay a bad thing now? If you're one say it, if you're not like you've said above fine. Live and let's live ![]() Gay rights activist indeed |
BinghiNya: the Quran is a book full of pooh. Killings, murder, arson,rape,incest and deception are all in it. I use it to clean my anussource; https://www.nairaland.com/1069077/summerise-bible-one-sentence/5 ![]() |
joey4jo: 0You saying we should be intimidated because of their violent behavior? ![]() |
Hmmm... I always suspected you to be queer |
Jihadists apologists the floor is yours. ![]() |
BetaThings: You did not laugh and ask the Britons to fight blasphemy by writing books when they had a law against blasphemySMH4You. Are you on the assumption that am in support of the holocaust denial punishment? Pls put your thinking cap on. |
One bad news after another. This is not a good time to be a Nigerian |
alexleo: You are too far away from the bible. What is the purpose of the death of Jesus? And you are here talking about sacrificing animal for our sins. Mr nearer to the bible do tell me what Jesus meant by he came to 'fulfill the law'. Jesus fulfilled all of the law. We cannot say that Jesus fulfilled the sacrificial system, but did not fulfill the other aspects of the law. Jesus either fulfilled all of the law, or none of it. So tell me which?? tithe payerGalatians 5:4 For if you are trying to make yourselves right with God by keeping the law, you have been cut off from Christ! You have fallen away from God's grace. |
uj_sizzle: This is more of an opinion seeking post.No it does not include preaching. Given in Paul's earlier letter which he allowed women to pray and Prophesy, the reason presumably maybe was women were asking question inappropriately in doing so interrupting the worship service. Even if one were to argue that Paul forbids women from speaking at all, this would only be restricted to married women as the context shows. It says nothing about single women. Corinthians11:3-16 3 But I want you to realize that the head of every man is Christ, and the head of the woman is man, and the head of Christ is God. 4 Every man who prays or prophesies with his head covered dishonors his head. 5 But every woman who prays or prophesies with her head uncovered dishonors her head— it is the same as having her head shaved. 6 For if a woman does not cover her head, she might as well have her hair cut off; but if it is a disgrace for a woman to have her hair cut off or her head shaved, then she should cover her head. 7 A man ought not to cover his head, since he is the image and glory of God; but woman is the glory of man. 8 For man did not come from woman, but woman from man; 9 neither was man created for woman, but woman for man. 10 It is for this reason that a woman ought to have authority over her own head, because of the angels. 11 Nevertheless, in the Lord woman is not independent of man, nor is man independent of woman. 12 For as woman came from man, so also man is born of woman. But everything comes from God. 13 Judge for yourselves: Is it proper for a woman to pray to God with her head uncovered? 14 Does not the very nature of things teach you that if a man has long hair, it is a disgrace to him, 15 but that if a woman has long hair, it is her glory? For long hair is given to her as a covering. 16 If anyone wants to be contentious about this, we have no such practice—nor do the churches of God. Although Paul states that man is given positional headship, he clearly states that in Christ both men and women are co-dependent. Paul also states that women can lead and even prophecy in the church. Secondly As bible makes makes it clear it's not proper for a woman to pray with her head uncovered, but if she has long hair, it glory to her; for her long hair is given to her as her covering Thirdly if any seems to contentious or argumentative about this, sorry I've no such custom, neither do the church of God. |
Ehmm... @haibe The same deut you base your argument on said you should sacrifice animal for your sins. Do you do it? If not why not? ![]() |
Say No To Jungle Justice.
|
ghazzal: why cant christians just REMOVE THE OLD TESTAMENT FROM THE BIBKE if thet dont believe in it and they dont want pple to refer to it,.. why is it still there..............Why remove it? It helps to keep in touch with ones roots. Let's face all the stories in the Quran starting from Adam and Eve to that of Jesus are from the bible. How do you source those stories without the bible? but i think they cant do that..... usually, the forget that JESUS SAID HE HAS NOT COME TO CHANGE THE LAW...[b]It's very criminal of you not to complete that statement. Jesus said “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them". Christ did not suggest here that the binding nature of the law of Moses would remain forever in effect. Such a view would contradicteverything we learn from the balance of the New Testament ( Romans 10:4 ; Galatians 3:23-25 ; Ephesians 2:15 ). Jesus did not come to this earth for the purpose of acting as an opponent of the law.Christ fulfilled the demands of the Mosaic law, which called for perfect obedience under threat of a “curse” (Galatians 3:10 , 13 ). In this sense, the law’s divine design will ever have an abiding effect. It will always accomplish the purpose for which it was given. If, however, the law of Moses bears the same relationship to men today, in terms of its binding status, then it was not fulfilled, and Jesus failed at what He came to do. On the other hand, if the Lord did accomplish His goal, then the law was fulfilled, and it is not a binding legal institution today. Jesus plainly said that not one “jot or tittle” would pass away until all was fulfilled. Consequently, nothing of the law was to fail until it had completely accomplished its purpose. Jesus fulfilled the law. Jesus fulfilled all of the law. We cannot say that Jesus fulfilled the sacrificial system, but did not fulfill the other aspects of the law. Jesus either fulfilled all of the law, or none of it.[/b] and BTW smart pants i ask you a question in this THREAD. It seems you've gone AWOL. Now enough trolling. Let's stay on the topic. It's about three dead pilgrims and the number of virgins they'll get |
*They hate America but love their blockbuster movies ![]() *They hate france but love their french kissing |
^^^^ First of all most of the verses you quote re old testaments which was referring to Isrealites living under the law. It no longer applies to Christians as NT made it clear several times John1:17 God gave the law through moses, but grace and truth came through Christ. So with Jesus’ atonement, we are no longer required to keep the Law. We are not under Law, but grace ( Rom. 6:14-15) The rest of your quotes are warning to sinners. Can you say your allah let sinners go free? You also quoted 1corintians i don't know what you're saying by that as the verse made it clear if the woman does not cover her head, she might as well cut her hair, but since it's a shameful thing for a woman to shave her hair, she should cover it. Then verse 16 says her long hair is given unto her as her covering. But since you the decided to play the 'you too' argument,let's play it. *. its being lawful for men to have four wives, but for a woman to have only one husband; Surah4:3 If ye fear that ye shall not be able to deal justly with the orphans, marry women of your choice, two or three or four; *“When Eve ate fruit which He had forbidden to her from the tree in Paradise, the Lord, be He praised, cursed women with eighteen punishments one of which is: * menstruation is a disease; Surah2:222 They question thee (O Muhammad) concerning menstruation. Say it is an illness beat them Surah4:34 ...As to those women On whose part ye fear Disloyalty and ill-conduct Admonish them (first)], (Next), refuse to share their beds, (And last) beat them. first verbal abuse, second psychological abuse and thirdly physical abuse A Woman’s Testimony is HALF as Valuable as a Man’s Qur’an (2:282) – “And call to witness, from among your men, two witnesses. And if two men be not found then a man and two women.” With this law many women have been convicted for being råpe victims since their testimony can't be accepted. Lock them away till death take their poor soul. Surah415 Those who commit unlawful sexual intercourse of your women confine the guilty women to houses until death takes them or Allah ordains for them [another] way. Women re majority in hell Bukhari 7.62.125 "Then I saw the (Hell) Fire, and I have never before, seen such a horrible sight as that, and I saw that the majority of its dwellers were women." Angels will curse women Bukhari 4.54.450 Allah's Apostle said, "If a husband calls his wife to his bed (i.e. to have sexual relation) and she refuses and causes him to sleep in anger, the angels will curse her till morning." Bukhari 4.54.450 It is hilarious to think that the angels have nothing better to do than sit around and curse the poor woman all the night for depriving them from watchingthe live Indecency show. If Allah must punish woman for not satisfying the sexual needs of their husbands whydoes he needs angels to lobby him for it? Isn’t it a waste of angel’s resources? In one sense this is all truly very funny. But in another, much larger sense, it is a tragedy. * And can you please show us the verse that deals about ®ape? Seems allah left that out |
The God Of Jews And Christians Gave His Reason For Sending Revelation To ArabsOP are you arab? |
LOL Muslims are calculating the number of virgins the pilgrims will get There is no harm if you decide to choose for your mom,sisters and wives 72 male virgins each in aljannah.Even in your Allah's aljanah women still don't get a say? Men's world and paradise. I so pity the muslimahs ![]() |
Mr you're in for a shock? ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
The quran is not in chronological order, all real scholar agree to this! But there was such order obviously. The first "revelation" came to muhammad in the cave. But it has number 96 in the quran. There are medina-surahs (came first). And mecca-surahs (came later). Now the order is completely mixed up !! So, this is my question; WHO HAS CORRUPTED THE QURAN BY PLACING SURAHS IN THE WRONG ORDER ? AND WHEN ?? AND MOST IF ALL ...WHY !!! REMEMBER: YOUR ALLAH DOES NOT LIKE HIS WORDS BEING CHANGED FROM THEIR RIGHT PLACES (SURAH5:13). AND THIS TIME NO SILLY EXCUSES AND LOGICAL FALLACIES, BUT A DIRECT HONEST ANSWER WITH REFERENCES, ETC ...PLEASE !!! ![]() |
Had_one: [size=18pt]So as you can see, the names include both Christians and Muslims. I have been saying it long ago that our major problem in this country is not religious but only bad eggs among us.[/size][size=18pt]What if it included muslims name? Maybe those muslims failed to recited the quran correctly or maybe they are from another sect. It's no news muslims kill those not belonging to their sect. Here is a thread of sunni muslims killing shias [/size] https://www.nairaland.com/961495/timeline-sectarian-terrorism-against-shia/1 ![]() |
ghazzal: the summary is - WHAT IS HIS SOURCE?Can you please use that your genuine source and answer the question from a wannabe muslim apostate?? It seems that Muhammad was not a nice man, I couldn’t find a single act of kindness from this person in the whole of Islam’s history. The only two stories of kindness were the story of Jew lady who used to throw garbage at prophet and he, at the time of her death came to visit her. And another incident about a young man who used to eat too much sugar and her motherSource |
Lol ok salman wrote a book that defamed Islam instead of putting 3 million dollars Why not the muslim Clerics write a rebuttal to it? Or do they lack logic reasoning? And to say he is a terrorist just for writing a book is laughable ![]() ![]() |
and of course this translation is also different from it sister translations....the same argument holds for it as aboveWill you find any movie or cartoon that says That says and the muslims have said Allah is God" That is the saying with their mouths, they imitate those that believed. May God destroy the. it's make no difference if they write in a book, through cartoon or with a movie. ....Christians and Muslims have over the years held many beliefs that are contrary to each other.....and not many eyebrows have been raised because of thia......unless pushed beyond the tolerance of some(e.g intentionally putting mocking pictures of prophet in public places to incite violence and hate)Allah decided to deride the belief of Christians through a book, if Christians decides to do deride Muhammad with cartoons in public places that's their choice. ..... and finallyYou forgot that Christians have always believed that Jesus is son of God hundreds of years before muhammad showed up with Allah. Don't you think Allah and mo should've respected that belief? So what if those mocking your prophet are members of a new religion that believes allah and mo re false? Your religion started the blasphemy 1st. .....so if u think our prophet is a superman of sex, a craddle-robber, a racist etc.....please keep it in your head or within the boundaries of your screen or book(i.e less expressive or more tolerable) rather than make it more explicit by making caricatures and videos of it in places as public as youtube and expects that it still be tolerable to most Muslims as it is the numerous profane statements of non-muslim Nairalanders about Islam.....Lol, @ bold. Go and give Muhammad that same advice. If he thinks that Jesus or uzar of jews is not the son of god, he should please keep it in his head But atlas the deed is done. So if christians or jews decides to return the favor, you don't reserve the right to tell them how to do it. What makes you think that if allah and mo has videos and cartoons during their days they won't use it? And yes you muslims should tolerate the mockery just like christians and jews have tolerated the numerous profane states of allah like; Quran 2:96 And verily you will find them (Jews) the greediest of mankind for life and (even greedier)than those who ascribe partners to Allah ( and do not believe in Resurrection-Majus,pagans and idolators). |
carefulme: i am not sure if people really want us to leave Islam for a good reasonarabic words you translated from infidels to unbelievers is kafir. Yes, the word kafir is a "legal term" denoting non-Muslims; and yes, most modern English Qurans translate it as "non-believer." However , and as you know fully well, the word kafir (plural, kafirin ) is heavy laden with negative associations, or, as I originally wrote, it "connotes 'enemies,' 'evil-doers,' and every bad thing to Muslim ears." Accordingly, Sharia mandates hostility for kafirin —war and subjugation when they are weak, deception and smooth-talk when they are strong. Quran 2: 98 simply declares that "Allah is the enemy of kafirin "—regardless of whether we translate that word as "infidels" or "non-believers. In fact, doctrine aside, consider how the Quran aloneportrays "non-believers": they are "guilty" and"unjust" (10:17, 45:31, 68:35); terror is to be cast intheir hearts for their injustice (3:151); they are"disliked" and "accursed" by Allah (2:89, 3:32, 33:64); they are the "vilest of beasts" (8:55, 98:6), like "cattle" and "devoid of understanding" (47:12, 8:65); and "enemies" to Muslims (4:101). And why are "non-believers" described thus? Simplybecause they are non-believers—because they are infidels . And as for your quotes @ bolded. what if a Christian book or Western movie appeared declaring that “ unbelievers are they who say Muhammad is the prophet of God. And if they do not desist from what they are saying, there will surely afflict the disbelievers among them a painful punishment. If Muslims would consider that a great defamation against Islam—and they would, with the attendant rioting, murders, etc.—then by the same standard it must be admitted that the Quran defames Christians and Christianity. |
AbdulSleek: Salaam everyone!Yes they have quite a good case here. There's even an article about 'how islam would be banned for defamation of other religion. You can read it Here And yes as lagoshia pointed out, people then thought Jesus was a prophet, but he's more than that. Matt16:13-17 Jesus went to the territory near the town of Caesarea Philippi, where he asked his disciples, "who the people say the son of Man is?" "Some say John the baptist," they answered. "Others say Elijah, while others say Jeremiah or some prophets." What about you?" He asked them. "Who do you say I am?" Simon Peter answered "You are the messiah, the son of the Living God" "God for you simon son of John!" answered Jesus. "For this truth did not come to you from any human being but my feather in heaven And this is the stance of most Christians. For someone to come and say otherwise is slander and defamation. It's blasphemy! ![]() 2) That islam is intolerant (Alah forgive them) because islam has not coexisted with any other religion in this present time. They ere complaining that in any islamic country, the minority religion suffers.Again they're right on point. consider the following: ============= Islam vis a vis other religions ============== --slam is the only religion which has "Shariaat book" which plays the constitution to implement its political agenda to a nation. --Islam is the only religion which holds that other religions must pay its followers an extortionary tax (Jiziya or poll- tax) in "humiliation." --Islam is the only religion which preaches that reform of its doctrine and dogma to adapt to changing circumstances is a grave sin ("bida" ![]() --Islam is the only religion which divides the world up into two spheres Land of Warfare "Darul harb" (non-Islamic nations) and "Darul Islam" (Land of Peace), and encourages the Land of "Peace" to fight against the Land of Warfare until it is completely "subdued". --Islam is the only religion which expressly forbids separation of church (or masjid) and state. --Islam is the only religion which extracts the death penalty from any of its followers who wish to leave it (apostate) -- a law which, again is unchangeable. --Islam is the only religion which holds up a single form of government -- a non-democratic theocracy headed by a Khalifa -- as the only legitimate form of government allowable on earth. --Islam is the only religion that upholds an extensive code of jurisprudence (unchangeable and barbaric and draconian in many cases) that governs every aspect of human life, both spiritual and temporal. --Islam is the only religion that largely forbids the free practice of other religions in its midst. Please consider also these facts: --They can't get along with Christians in Nigeria and Sudan --They can't get along with Eastern Orthodox in Eastern Europe --They can't get along with Hindus and Buddhists in Malaysia --They can't get along with Hindus in the Sub-Continent --They can't get along with Buddhists in Thailand and Burma --They can't get along with Catholics in the Philippines --They can not get along with majority Chinese in mainland China --They can not get along with majority Russian (Muslims in Chechnya) in Russia --They can't get along with Jews in the Middle East --They can't get along with Coptic Christians in Egypt --They can't get along with Christians in Indonesia --They can't get along with Ba'hai in Iran --Shia and Sunni can't get along with each other very well in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Bahrain, etc. --Sunnis can't get along with Ahmadis on the Sub-Continent and want to exterminate them. 3) That some of them tried to date women (this is the one that amuses me) that were muslims only to find out that they could not marry the muslim women due to the Quran's stipulation. They were angry that a muslim man is allowed to marry their women. They argue that it is intoleranceAccording to the Quran , Muslims should NOT marry people who don’t believe in Islam. Do not marry unbelieving women until they believe. A slave woman who believes is better than an unbelieving woman, even though if she attracts you. And not marry (your girls) to unbelievers until they believe. A man slave who believes is better than an unbeliever, even though if he attracts you.( Quran 2:221). And I’m not even going to get started on the comparison to slaves… In addition to not allowing interfaith marriages, most families prefer not to even let their children marry anyone from a different country. Even if they are Muslim. They like to keep it within their culture and traditions so they don’t have to worry about “inter-cultural” differences. Exceptions for Men The Quran later “revealed” an exception that was directed only to the men. To me, it is more like a contradiction, because it disagrees with the law in theprevious verse. The exception says that men are allowed to marry “people of the book”, generally known as Christians and Jews. I guess they feel that the two religions are close enough to Islam to be considered ok. Lawful to you in marriage are not only chaste women who are believers, but chaste women among the People of the Book. (Quran 5:5). What About the Women? Of course, there is a double standard in Islam…. again. As usual, the women are left behind, because according to Islam, women cannot marry anyone that is not Muslim…. no matter what. Excuses Given by Muslims Muslims always come up with many excuses that “explain” why women don’t get the same rules as men. Here are some of the things they say: *. The man is always the head of the household so his religion is always what the family follows. *. Women are “weaker” emotionally so if she marries anon-Muslim man, she will be influenced by him and she would be more likely to change her beliefs. *. When they have kids, they will always go by the fathers religion (I guess they didn’t know that Judaism is based on maternal lineage. The mother determines the religion of the children). *. They just don’t want to be influenced by non-Muslims. The Reality – How People Deal withtheir Interfaith Relationships Because of these religious laws, many couples are faced with making a really difficult decision. They usually have three choices: 1. They can just break it off and forget about getting married. 2. The woman can marry a non-Muslim anyway and face the consequences. I think that in most cases she will be at least disowned, but this can really vary depending on where she lives. 3. The man can “convert” to Islam. That way the woman does not have to choose between her familyand the man she loves. I have to say that this is a popular option, because no one wants to lose their family. It’s just sad…. It just seems that Muslims keep figuring out ways to make life difficult for their people.They have to be in control so they can make sure Islam keeps growing bygaining new converts or having little Mini-Muslims running around. Muslims also think they are better than others so they have this great fear of being “influenced”. Aren’t we supposed to try to bring people together to make this world a better place? Instead, Islam drives people apart and makes non-Muslims think that they are not worthy. 4) That islam is against freedom of speech. One non-muslim made the others laugh by saying that Islam is boring that they dont even have proper comedians in islamic countries because one false joke about the religion and they are dead.LOL I don't know about islam being boring I know it's bunch of rules, there's even one which tells which foot will be used to enter a toilet and the number of stones to be used for... ![]() I too am questioning my faith as a muslim. The non-muslims in my office really hammered point number 3. I pay my niece's university school fees. If she brings back a british boy from university whom she wants to marry that is not muslim, should I stop her? If the boy doesnt convert, do I really have the right to say that she is not a real muslim for marrying a non-muslim?It seems you already made that your decision since you rejected your bros in islam advices The non-muslim workers were bitter about this fact. I had to even caution them as they were saying things like "muslims should stick to only their women that dress like ninja if they dont want us to marry their women"LOL Yes, they were abusive at times but they had me pondering at this point. Wouldnt the non-muslim feel cheated that someone can freely take his women (assuming they are people of the book) but he cant take theirs?Do unto others as would have them do unto. Guess 1 religion that doesn't preach this Golden Rule? ![]() Please help me counter these point or leave comments. Thank you very much!I hope I've been helpful. Good luck in your debate, you'll definitely need it. |




tithe payer