₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: Register • Login • With Google • Trending • Recent • New

Stats: 3,344,826 members, 8,513,870 topics. Date: Thursday, 05 November 2026 at 04:45 PM

Toggle theme

Plappville's Posts

Nairaland Forum › Plappville's Profile › Plappville's Posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 (of 249 pages)

Christianity Etc › Re: @i.chuka & Others Lets Discuss D Revelation 12 Woman And The Marian Apparition. by plappville(op): 10:59pm On Nov 30, 2012
Ubenedictus: no probs
cool
Christianity Etc › Re: Tithing Ended And Abolished In The N.T - An Exposition On Hebrews Chapter 7. by plappville(f): 10:51pm On Nov 30, 2012
Image123: @plap, hope you're not short too? Amusing and short is not a good combination oh, lolz.
I'm kidding oh, you know i sabi tickle you.
let me go take my flight, thank you Jesus, today no bi 'Shabbath'. plap for get chance catch me. I'll also have to put on THE WHOLE armour of God just in case. heeeeeeeehaaaaaaaaaa.
Na you sabi, I am only reminding you of the Sabbath, the day God set aside right from the beginning.
You sabi tickle me, me too sabi when to entertain you grin grin

Sabbath + tithe for bros...image123 grin grin grin grin
Christianity Etc › Re: Tithing Ended And Abolished In The N.T - An Exposition On Hebrews Chapter 7. by plappville(f): 10:44pm On Nov 30, 2012
Image123: plap, please be polite enough to converse with me in English. Thank you.
How did i sound rude and what brought English into this? i have always communicated with you in English language, so what's your point?
Christianity Etc › Re: Tithing Ended And Abolished In The N.T - An Exposition On Hebrews Chapter 7. by plappville(f): 10:35pm On Nov 30, 2012
seriallink: ^^Are you saying Paul's teachings weren't inspired by Jesus/Holy Spirit? If you reject his teachings, you are rejecting Jesus too; unless ofcourse you are not a Christian like Sis. Plappvile askedhuh Smh!!!
I fear this bros ooo shocked shocked shocked
Christianity Etc › Re: Tithing Ended And Abolished In The N.T - An Exposition On Hebrews Chapter 7. by plappville(f): 10:32pm On Nov 30, 2012
Bidam: madam i don't intend to respond to ur ignorance. But i have to so as to set the records straight...i think u ave heard of the word EMPHASIS...Paul was the emphasis added..or is paul the author of ur faith!??Smh! Ayam a believer and i OBEY GOD not the philosopies and ideologies of men.
Who is saying Paul is the author of Christian faith here? and mind you, Paul did not taught that too, did He. See your comment again:

Bidam: @image.God bless u sir.. i really like the part u said i'd rather obey Jesus than a thousand exposition.. dat is mind blowing my brother... Jesus and not paul is indeed the Author and Perfecter of our Faith.
The passages the OP has been treating are the writing of Paul? Your comment shows They are not to be trusted.
And you even made it seem as if @image123 is rejecting the expositions because they are from Paul undecided
dat is mind blowing my brother... Jesus and not paul
Did Paul made Himself an Apostle? no. Jesus chosed Him, so His writings are inspired and all point to Christ.

Galatians 1:12 For I did not receive it from any man, nor was I taught it, but I received it through a revelation of Jesus Christ.

1 Corinthians 11:23 For I received from the Lord what I also delivered to you, that the Lord Jesus on the night when he was betrayed took bread,


So i ask you again, are you a Christian?
Christianity Etc › Re: Will Jesus Have Bought A Jet? by plappville(f): 10:07pm On Nov 30, 2012
mumumugu: JESUS WAS BORN IN A MANGER NT hospital

he waz visitd by shepherd not celebrity

his father was capenter nt governor

his desciple were fishermen nt politician

he orded d disciple to walk witout slipers.he didnt provide jet 4 them

he walkd on foot and rode a donkey. No jet , no chariot

he neva ask nor recivd money 4 miracle.

He sufferd

he forgav his enemy. No holyghost fire

no
Nice one, Let me add this: Jesus didn't need Bodyguards, physical security. grin grin
Christianity Etc › Re: Will Jesus Have Bought A Jet? by plappville(f): 9:58pm On Nov 30, 2012
@OP, i dont think He would have because He said: John 18:36 Jesus said, "My kingdom is not of this world. If it were, my servants would fight to prevent my arrest by the Jews. But now my kingdom is from another place."

The NT teaches us that He had no fixed home since he traveled around preaching, teaching and healing.

"Foxes have holes and birds of the air have nests, but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay His head." (Luke 9:58)

Todays Christ-likes have place to lay thier head, but this is not enough, they accumulates materials as if They are not willing to join thier
master in His Kingdom. King David said, All these are vanity and vexation of the heart.

Ecclesiastes 2:11 Yet when I surveyed all that my hands had done and what I had toiled to achieve, everything was meaningless, a chasing after the wind; nothing was gained under the sun.

Ecclesiastes 2:26 To the man who pleases him, God gives wisdom, knowledge and happiness, but to the sinner he gives the task of gathering and storing up wealth to hand it over to the one who pleases God. This too is meaningless, a chasing after the wind.

Ecclesiastes 2:17 So I hated life, because the work that is done under the sun was grievous to me. All of it is meaningless, a chasing after the wind.
Christianity Etc › Re: $5,000 Stolen In Chris Oyakhilome's Vault by plappville(f): 9:40pm On Nov 30, 2012
Hmmmm, hard to belive this story!
Christianity Etc › Re: Is Michael The Archangel Really Jesus? (revelation 12:7) by plappville(f): 8:59pm On Nov 30, 2012
ijawkid: Jesus being reffered to as an ANGEL does not in anyway degrade him ...........
_________________________

if you think Jesus being called an angel degrades Him,how about Jesus being reffered to as the HIGH PRIEST if Yahweh......how about Jesus being reffered to as Yahwehs apostle......how about Jesus being reffered to as Yahwehs servant.....

Right now as we speak Jesus is a servant of YAHWEH..........

""Servant"" is a title we all bear(including) Jesus except Yahweh who is over all......

As far as the scriptures is concerned Jesus remains a messenger of Yahweh......and nothing SPOIL,,,,,,,
MINDS ARE HARDEN TO ACCEPT WHAT THEY SEE IN THE SCRIPTURES, WE CAN PUT UP THE SCRIPTURE FOR EVERYONE
TO SEE BUT WE CANNOT FORCE ANYONE TO ACCEPT WHAT IS IN IT.

WITH ALL THE SCRIPTURES THAT HAVE PROVED THE angel of the lord BEING REFFERED TO AS CHRIST, they still don't accept them. shocked
With all the scriptures plain in front of bros @Frosbel showing Christ pre-existance, He persist in his Belief that Chirst never pre'existed. shocked
None is been forced to believe or accept what the scripture says. But as we all can clearly see in this thread, Scripture as been interpreting scriptures.

Good work so far broo!
Christianity Etc › Re: Is Michael The Archangel Really Jesus? (revelation 12:7) by plappville(f): 8:36pm On Nov 30, 2012
Boomark: American Standard
Version
And I (Jesus) will strengthen
them in Jehovah; and they
shall walk up and down in
"his" (Yahweh's) name, saith
Jehovah.

From what you inserted here, it looks as if it is Jesus that said "I will strengthen them in Jehovah..." and afterwards the statement is "saith by Jehovah."

Are you trying to say that Jesus is Jehovah while Yahweh is the Father?

I gave you a link where statements like that were treated. Stop inserting Jesus where you did not see it.

[size=14pt] IS Jesus the word of God or not? [/size] I did not Say that Jesus is Jehovah, some scripure will uses "the lord" some times for both Yahweh and Jesus. So its now translation problem abi? grin
All other translation used "the Lord" only the one that used ANGEL you chosed to accept.
You'r Not been Honest here BRO...!


Zechariah 3:1-2
Good News Translation (GNT)

In another vision the LORD
showed me the High Priest Joshua
standing before the angel of the
LORD. And there beside Joshua
stood Satan, ready to bring an
accusation against him. 2 The angel
of the LORD[b] said to Satan, “May
the LORD condemn you, Satan! May
the LORD, who loves Jerusalem,
condemn you.
This man is like a
stick snatched from the fire.”

Is this not a better translation? If you still use LORD LORD that cannot be differentiated then my explanations and the link above shows it is.
Hey bro, i am not the majority translators, why didnrt you used this one to completelly convince us? grin grin

(NLT) 3 Then the angel showed me Jeshua[a] the high priest standing before the angel of the Lord. The Accuser, Satan, was there at the angel’s right hand, making accusations against Jeshua. 2 And the Lord said to Satan, “I, the Lord, reject your accusations, Satan. Yes, the Lord, who has chosen Jerusalem, rebukes you. This man is like a burning stick that has been snatched from the fire.”

See more versions:
(KJV)3:1 And he shewed me Joshua the high priest standing before the angel of the Lord, and Satan standing at his right hand to resist him. 2 And the Lord said unto Satan, The Lord rebuke thee, O Satan; even the Lord that hath chosen Jerusalem rebuke thee: is not this a brand plucked out of the fire?

NASB: 3:1 Then he showed me aJoshua the high priest standing before the angel of the Lord, and 1bSatan standing at his right hand to accuse him.
2 The Lord said to Satan, “The Lord rebuke you, Satan! Indeed, the Lord who has bchosen Jerusalem rebuke you! Is this not a cbrand plucked from the fire?”

AV 1873: And he shewed me aJoshua bthe high priest standing before cthe angel of the Lord, and d* Satan standing at his right hand * to resist him.
2 And the Lord said unto Satan, The Lord rebuke thee, O Satan;
Even the Lord that hath chosen Jerusalem rebuke thee:
Is not this ga brand pluckt out of the fire?

NIRV: Then the Lord showed me the high priest Jeshua. He was standing in front of the angel of the Lord. Satan was standing to the right of Jeshua. He was there to bring charges against the high priest. 2The Lord said to Satan, “May the Lord correct you! He has chosen Jerusalem. So may he correct you! Isn’t this man Jeshua like a burning stick pulled out of the fire?”

NIV: Then he showed me Joshuaa u the high priest standing before the angel of the Lord, and Satanb v standing at his right side to accuse him. 2 The Lord said to Satan, “The Lord rebuke you,w Satan! The Lord, who has chosenx Jerusalem, rebuke you! Is not this man a burning sticky snatched from the fire?”z



The truth is that, The Angel of the lord is the same lord that is telling Satan that God rebuked Satan.
God is the one that Has chosen Israel. Jesus told us that God sent him to the lost sheep of Israel.
The Lord here referred the rebuking to God almight just like Michael did when contending for the body of Moses with Satan.
There is no twisting here, This two chapters are tied up. Zechariah 3:1-5 and Jude 1:9
Christianity Etc › Re: Tithing Ended And Abolished In The N.T - An Exposition On Hebrews Chapter 7. by plappville(f): 12:41am On Nov 30, 2012
Image123: With the way my boy Gosh was barking here like a violently possessed chicken, one would think he'd have exposed some heresy by now. Instead the guy just sober.lolz. Gosh my brother, dump the tension and pay your tithe, i may reply you in detail later as you expect.
And dont forget to put in practice the no 4 in the 10 COMMANDMENT.
Christianity Etc › Re: Tithing Ended And Abolished In The N.T - An Exposition On Hebrews Chapter 7. by plappville(f): 12:37am On Nov 30, 2012
Image123: You need an update.
Mat 23:23 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone.
You are putting this aside, recall? What is the spirit of the NT, i need to be clear?
Hebrews 7 tells us that tithes was received after the law, you are beginning to bore me. i thought that issue was already past? What is the law of Christ, and who told you tithes is not part of this 'law of Christ'even after Christ commended it?
Mat 23:23 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone.
WHAT ABOUT THE ONE HE SAID{ pray that ur flight be not in winter or on the * Sabbath*? and besides, he said he is the lord of the sabbath} Remember, if you break one, you break all.

Hypocrite!!!
Christianity Etc › Re: Tithing Ended And Abolished In The N.T - An Exposition On Hebrews Chapter 7. by plappville(f): 12:29am On Nov 30, 2012
Bidam: @image.God bless u sir..i really like the part u said i'd rather obey Jesus than a thousand exposition..dat is mind blowing my brother... Jesus and not paul is indeed the Author and Perfecter of our Faith.
ARE YOU A CHRISTIANhuh?
PLEASE BREAK DOWN THIS YOUR ♪♪.
Christianity Etc › Re: Tithing Ended And Abolished In The N.T - An Exposition On Hebrews Chapter 7. by plappville(f): 12:17am On Nov 30, 2012
Pastor Kun: @Goshen
Thanx so much for this thorough + painstaking exposition into Hebrews 7. I believe a lot of brethen have learnt a lot and a lot more would be set free from the shackles of this false doctrine that is so popular in our churches today. May God continue to enrich you and bless you in the knowledge of his word.
I THANK HIM TOO, HE HAS DONE A GOOD JOB, WELL BACKED UP WITH SCRIPTURES. I HAVE NEVER READ A COMPLETE EXPOSITION ON TITHE LIKE THIS ONE....BRAVO TO OP!
Christianity Etc › Re: Pastor Chris And T.b Joshua Are Satanic. (pst Chris Is A White Demon) by plappville(f): 9:26pm On Nov 29, 2012
@secretpart: I think you are going too deep, where is your proof?
Christianity Etc › Re: Pastor Chris And T.b Joshua Are Satanic. (pst Chris Is A White Demon) by plappville(f): 9:20pm On Nov 29, 2012
[quote author=Ricky_Ross]Mentally derailed animals everywhere. How did this monkey know which pastor is white demon and black demon?
Africa will be a better place if we concentrate more on ourselves and stop talking about people who do not give a Bleep about us.[/quote]You are commiting same crime as the OP, Why calling human Animals and the OP monkey?

Genesis 1:27So God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; male and female he created them.
Not Animals bro.....!
Christianity Etc › Re: Is Michael The Archangel Really Jesus? (revelation 12:7) by plappville(f): 8:56pm On Nov 29, 2012
frosbel: So until I accept the line of the JW organisation , my reputation is at stake , lol.

See how you guys are towing the line of JW instead of forming your opinions based on independent biblical analysis and thought.

Jesus is no angel , totally false.
John 8:57-58 "Your father Abraham rejoiced to see My day, and he saw it and was glad."
Then the Jews said to Him, "You are not yet fifty years old, and have You seen Abraham?"


Bros leave the Angel issue aside first, Explain this verses please!
Christianity Etc › Re: Is Michael The Archangel Really Jesus? (revelation 12:7) by plappville(f): 8:46pm On Nov 29, 2012
Boomark: I didn't see "jesus is an angel" there o! Are you using scrolls or the original manuscripts?
Must the Name Jesus be mentioned first? Who is the msg of the convenant to you?
Christianity Etc › Re: Is Michael The Archangel Really Jesus? (revelation 12:7) by plappville(f): 8:38pm On Nov 29, 2012
Boomark: Zechariah 10:12.
New International Version
(©1984)
I will strengthen them in
the LORD and in his name
they will walk," declares
the LORD.

American Standard
Version
And I Jesus will strengthen
them in Jehovah; and they
shall walk up and down in
"his" Yahweh's name, saith Jehovah.

Plappy, where you quoted is similar Zechariah 10:12. You see that it is the LORD Himself that spoke. It is not something impossible.
You did not treat these verses even the one you presented still shows Christ was the one talking. Whose Name will they walk uo and down? Yahweh's name no?

Again, It is Christ talking in verse two. Zachariah three told us It was Jesus talking. Who is the Lord that says The Lord rebuke Satan? Is it God Himself?
If It is Yahweh, why and who is greater than Him that He will have to refers the rebuking of Satan to?

Zachariah3: 2 And the LORD (Jesus) said to Satan, "The LORD (Yahweh) rebuke you, Satan!
The LORD who has chosen Jerusalem rebuke you! This is referring to Yahweh.

If it was Yahweh, He will say I rebuke you. It shows that the Angel of the Lord that Satan tried to oppossed is the same one that is also called "The lord".
That's my point and you did not see it, but went and gave me an other verse.
Christianity Etc › Re: The Appearance Of Mr Melchisedek... by plappville(f): 8:14pm On Nov 29, 2012
tip999: So Christ is not God?
No sir, He told Us He was sent to earth by Yahweh. And that He was returning to Yahweh.
Yahweh cannot send Himself message na?
Christianity Etc › Re: The Appearance Of Mr Melchisedek... by plappville(f): 8:10pm On Nov 29, 2012
Zikkyy: You talk like you were in attendance. na wa for you
Na bible talk am, abi you want the Bible to contradict itself? See @truthislight has given the right scripture.
Are we to beliebve it or not?
Christianity Etc › Re: Is Michael The Archangel Really Jesus? (revelation 12:7) by plappville(f): 5:34pm On Nov 29, 2012
true2god: U dnt seem to want to say 'Yes, Jesus christ is an angel'. Thats the dilenma, but u can muddle-up unrelated verse to say Jesus christ is arch angel Michael. But if i put it up to u to giv a direct response by simply sayin 'Jesus is an angel' u wnt want to say dat.

The point here is dat if JW comes up with the latest publication that says 'Jesus is not angel michael' u wll naturally change ur perception on dis belief. Thats not an independent way of reasoning, basing ones interpretation of the bible on an organization that hav made differnt changes in their doctrine or belief (the light gettin brighter fallacy).

If watchtower had published many articles earlier that r presently being considerd false or mistake (by the same watchtower), what gives u the impression dat there is no current belief they held that is false? U dnt seem to knw the history of watchtower my sister. From failed prophecies to change in doctrinal belief. My question to u again is, 'is Jesus christ an angel'? U can do me a favour by bein straight about it.
Go treat those verses before i answer you. You never asked someone before? abi na you be the Human wen the old prophets see face to face?
No man has seen God at any time dear! (John 1:18, Exodus 33:20) except you want to contradict the bible.
And Angels are not to be worshiped, so Christ has been the "ANGEL OF THE LORD" severally reffered to.

Oya....scroll back and help moi!
Christianity Etc › Re: Is Michael The Archangel Really Jesus? (revelation 12:7) by plappville(f): 5:29pm On Nov 29, 2012
BARRISTERS: @True2God



i have answered in page 17 before, and im answering now again, [size=18pt]yes,[/size] he was once reffered to as angel malachi 3:1.

okay?
This is scripturally Valid !!
Christianity Etc › Re: The Appearance Of Mr Melchisedek... by plappville(f): 3:49pm On Nov 29, 2012
tip999: only God has no beginning of days . remember God visited abraham in human form.
It was Jesus that talk to Abraham. Dont forget, No man has ever seen God so how can He now come in Human form?
Even the bible says GOD IS NOT A MAN. Scripture made us know that It is the spirit of Jesus that has alway inspired the prophets in the times of the Old Testament. (1 Peter 1:10-11).

Consider the burning bush experience, when the "Angel of the Lord" connects with God:

And the angel of the LORD appeared unto him in a flame of fire out of the midst of a bush: and he looked, and, behold, the bush burned with fire, and the bush was not consumed.
And Moses said, I will now turn aside, and see this great sight, why the bush is not burnt.
And when the LORD saw that he turned aside to see, God called unto him out of the midst of the bush, and said, Moses, Moses. And he said, Here am I.
And he said, Draw not nigh hither: put off thy shoes from off thy feet, for the place whereon thou standest is holy ground.
Moreover he said, I am the God of thy father, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob. And Moses hid his face; for he was afraid to look upon God.
And the LORD said,
I have surely seen the affliction of my people which are in Egypt, and have heard their cry by reason of their taskmasters; for I know their sorrows; Exodus 3:2-7


The angel of the Lord appears before Moses in a burning bush that does not burn up, yet as we read into the experience (above) we see that it is God Himself. God will not appear in Human form, this will contradict the scripture. It is Christ and two angels that came to visit Abraham.
Christianity Etc › Re: Is Michael The Archangel Really Jesus? (revelation 12:7) by plappville(f): 3:19pm On Nov 29, 2012
frosbel: Sir, I am too busy these days, so might not be able to answer you point for point.

There is no way we can agree on this one.

It is almost blasphemy to suggest that Jesus Christ was angel Michael, he was not.

You are basing your understanding not on the bible but the teachings of the JW or SDA.

Jesus is simply the Son of GOD , a MAN who gave his life for you and me. He is now exalted above all power and principality and this includes Michael.

Try and read the bible without the bias of organisational interpretation, you just might learn a thing or two.
Then qoute wrong those scriptures, tell us who Paul was referring to,.....Even the SDA and the JW believe the bolded too.
I was listening to a sermon on one SDA pastor i think His name

"Doug Batchelor" This man did not even say Jesus is an Angel. I do not know of the JW, but the few times they have approached me, they did not preach Angel Jesus to me, but Christ as the Son of God who will come back to rule on earth.
Christianity Etc › Re: Is Michael The Archangel Really Jesus? (revelation 12:7) by plappville(f): 3:10pm On Nov 29, 2012
BARRISTERS: @plappvile



you see arrogance? question dey answer question! that is an evidence that they have nothing to hold on again than 'arrogance'.

even 'frosbel' has ran out of gas completely with his advantage of freethinking could not reply my last question above,while i have answerd his,this is due to the fact that he ignored bible warning....''do not lean on your own understanding''prov 3:5 frosbel says noo, i must lean on my own underatanding to my own advantage. he con enter gbege!
grin grin grin grin
Christianity Etc › Re: Re : Why are the Devil And His Angels Not Yet In HELL ? by plappville(f): 3:08pm On Nov 29, 2012
Image123: Perhaps you were drunk when reading me. i'm saying the same thing i've been saying on this issue since i joined this forum.
grin grin grin grin grin grin grin grin grin grin grin grin grin grin grin grin grin grin

Boomark: May be i was also drunk then. Its good to see you are now doing well. Unless someone else used your id to write what is up there.
Still grin grin grin grin grin grin grin grin grin grin grin grin grin grin grin
Christianity Etc › Re: Re : Why are the Devil And His Angels Not Yet In HELL ? by plappville(f): 3:06pm On Nov 29, 2012
CrazyMan: 1 Peter 5:8 says, “Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil, as a roaring lion, walketh about, seeking whom he may devour”

Ephesians 6:12, “For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.” The battle is not between human beings. It’s against the prince of this world.

He’s not in hell, yet. He’s busy trying to distract, discourage, and destroy!

He's time on earth isn't up yet...once its up, he would be bouned and casted into the lake of fire along with other sinners.

See the passage below for satan's judgment...

Revelation 20:1-3.  And I saw an angel come down from heaven, having the key of the bottomless pit and a great chain in his hand. 2 And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan, and bound him a thousand years, 3 And cast him into the bottomless pit, and shut him up, and set a seal upon him, that he should deceive the nations no more, till the thousand years should be fulfilled: and after that he must be loosed a little season.


Once a man dies, he goes to the grave...pending the day of resurrection when he would give an account of the life he/she live here on earth.


No one goes to hell...until the final judgement.

The Bible tells us of two people who died and came back. Jesus Christ and lazarus. This is what Jesus says after His experience in death:

John 20:17. "Touch Me not; for I am not yet ascended to My Father: but go to My brethren, and say unto them, I ascend unto My Father and your Father; and to My God, and your God."

From this statement, we have to admit, Christ did not go to the Father in His death, but only after He raised Himself to life, and His body was functioning again.

At death, Christ could go no where except to the grave where people put Him after He died. Only when He raised Himself to life, could He go anywhere at all!

I've read countless stories of people who claim to have visited heaven or hell...to be honest, I don't believe such stories... If Christ couldn't go anywhere but to the grave, are we better than Christ in our death, do we go to heaven or hell and not just the grave?

Also lazarus in the bible who was raised up from the dead never mentioned anything like hell or heaven...he was sleeping comfortable in the grave until christ rose him up from the grave.

Finally...

Revelation 20:13.  And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works.

The passage above confirms my stand...if people would go to hell or heaven at death, then what dead was this passage referring to that the sea, death and hades gave up?


I've don't that. wink
Nice one bro... smiley
Christianity Etc › Re: Is Michael The Archangel Really Jesus? (revelation 12:7) by plappville(f): 1:55pm On Nov 29, 2012
BARRISTERS: True and authentic!, plenty plenty still dey! just concentrate on what you are doing and let me engage them with their criminal past. and let the whole world see their yansh!
grin grin grin grin grin grin grin grin grin
Christianity Etc › Re: Is Michael The Archangel Really Jesus? (revelation 12:7) by plappville(f): 1:55pm On Nov 29, 2012
true2god: Thats not the ansa to my question. Frm ur 'research' and conclusion is Jesus chris an angel? Yes or no. I dnt think this simple question is in anyway ambigous.
See me see @true2god ooooo, what "research"? So you no dey read those scriptures posted since morning? shocked shocked

You den already see scripture interprets itself severally, wetin you want from me again?
Ok, i go answer your "yes or no", but go answer those questions you have been ignoring, if you want a direct answer from me.
Christianity Etc › Re: Is Michael The Archangel Really Jesus? (revelation 12:7) by plappville(f): 10:32am On Nov 29, 2012
BARRISTERS: @ubenedictus



this type of your illiteracy has entered 'agono' or 'alagono' like the yorubas says, instead of you to have asked what 'your worship' and other legal 'registers' means before proceeding on a public here on NL to expose your dirty linnen. now in legal terms, if you dont know, these registers you mention above with ignorance are exclusively for legal usages, no judge is called 'your worship' ehn? but they are addressed that way because of their superiority among those seated in the court.

there is no link between using 'your worship' addresing a judge complying with legal requirements in a court of law, and the pope who on his own wrote in his Bull and was said to be permitting and encouraging the worship of the seven archangels

''Pope Pius V said in his Bull to the Spanish Clergy, permitting and encouraging the worship of the seven archangels

the difference is that is that the decision to singlehandedly permit and encouraged such idolatory act was not a unanimous resolution,but he forced or led the church into idolatory.while that of the court are unanimously agreed to and adressed to the judges 'office'. okay?
olodo.


you are a liar, see picture A below, your priests were blessing armoury,and guns, actively participating in blessing tools that will be used not to kill grasscutters or antelopes but a fellow humans like you, now can you say that these priests respect Gods command

THOU SHALL NOT KILL? but the priest blessed the armoury with so-called holy water not mindfull of other catholics in the other opponents camp. we saw catholics soldiers (britain/America) vs catholic soldiers (france)(germany) killing each other,

what a shame, see the pics of a shamefull act of your priest below pics A


yeah,
This picture, is it for real? shocked shocked shocked shocked shocked
Christianity Etc › Re: Is Michael The Archangel Really Jesus? (revelation 12:7) by plappville(f): 10:29am On Nov 29, 2012
A brief look at this two passages: @boomark, i would like you to take a look at these two events and tell me if there is no parallel.

[size=14pt]Angel of the LORD[/size]
Zechariah 3:1-5 1 Then he showed me Joshua the high priest standing before the Angel of the LORD, and Satan standing at his right hand to oppose him. 2 And the LORD said to Satan, "The LORD rebuke you, Satan! The LORD who has chosen Jerusalem rebuke you! Is this not a brand plucked from the fire?" 3 Now Joshua was clothed with filthy garments, and was standing before the Angel. 4 Then He answered and spoke to those who stood before Him, saying, "Take away the filthy garments from him." And to him He said, "See, I have removed your iniquity from you, and I will clothe you with rich robes."
5 And I said, "Let them put a clean turban on his head." So they put a clean turban on his head, and they put the clothes on him. And the Angel of the LORD stood by.


[size=14pt] Archangel Michael [/size]

9. Yet Michael the archangel, in contending with the devil, when he disputed about the body of Moses, dared not bring against him a reviling accusation, but said, "The Lord rebuke you!" Jude 1:9

In Zechariah, we saw Joshua th high priest standin befor the Angel of the Lord.
Satan, the accuser, is also present to oppose what the Angel of the Lord is doing.
In the 2rd verse, the Angel of the Lord starts speaking to Satan.
In this verse The Angel of the Lord is actualy called "the LORD".
We know that it is not the Father (Yahweh) speaking. Why would the Father say: "The Lord rebuke you"? shocked
No, it is not the Father. It is the Son! One Lord is speaking of the other Lord. Scripture made plain to those who say Christ never existed.

Jude 1:9 is an interesting parallel whic helps to confirm that it is the Angel of the Lord and not the Father (Yahweh) who is speaking in Zechariah.
Because the Angel of the Lord in Zechariah is doing the "very same" thing that Michael the archangel does in Jude.

If you notice very weell, you will see 3 things in common tht connect Zechariah 3:1-2 and Jude 1:9, they are are follow:
(1) They are referring to the same person. The Angel of the Lord is Michael the archangel.
(2) In both texts, Satan is confronted. (3)both times, he does nt accuse Satan directly, but he refers the rebuking of Satan to the "Father".
Both times He says: "the Lord rebuke you". So Satan is approached in the same way.
So we again have the Angel of the Lord as being identified as being the Lord. After this very one, we will still take a look at Moses and the burning bush.
I believe the angel of the Lord was identified as God there. One thing at a time. Lets treat this one first.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 (of 249 pages)