falseprophet:
Afghanistan is not in any chaos, the streets are safer now than when America were running things.

Taliban is already offering amnesty to saboteurs and it can only get better from here.

Don't let western media fool you into thinking "Afghanistan have fallen"

BeeBeeOoh:
Our problem now is that man occupying Aso Rock not Afghanistan nor Joe Biden miscalculating.



Make everybody carry their load's respectively

Tolumiide:

Trump started the withdrawal process. It doesn't make sense fighting a war you can not win with huge resources.

Amb1045:
everywhere on social media you see them talking its Christians that killed them. Lol they refuse to accept it's retaliation for there atrocities. Make them wait till buhari comot for power. Them go collect. Fulani is an endangered specie

(CNN)President Joe Biden and his administration struggled Sunday to project order amid a race by American and other foreign personnel to evacuate Afghanistan as Taliban fighters entered Kabul.

The rapid fall of Afghanistan's national forces and government has come as a shock to Biden and senior members of his administration, who only last month believed it could take months before the civilian government in Kabul fell -- allowing a period of time after American troops left before the full consequences of the withdrawal were laid bare.

Now, months after his initial declaration that all 2,500 US troops would be out of Afghanistan by the end of the summer, a total of 6,000 troops are expected to help facilitate the evacuation.
And officials are frankly admitting they miscalculated.

"The fact of the matter is we've seen that that force has been unable to defend the country," Secretary of State Antony Blinken told CNN's Jake Tapper on "State of the Union," referring to Afghanistan's national security forces. "And that has happened more quickly than we anticipated."
Biden is expected to address the nation in the next few days about the crisis in Afghanistan, according to a senior administration official, though a final decision on a speech hadn't been made and the President hasn't yet cut short his summer vacation visit to Camp David.

One option under discussion is to have Biden return to the White House, though the official cautioned that they had not completely ruled out making the remarks from the presidential retreat, where he was photographed on Sunday receiving a briefing from his national security team. In the photo, Biden appeared alone wearing a polo shirt in front of a large bank of monitors.

The risks for Biden politically are uncertain; a majority of Americans say in polls they support withdrawing troops from Afghanistan, and Biden's aides have calculated the country shares his weariness at prolonging a 20-year conflict.

et the chaotic scenes playing out as that war ends -- evoking the fall of Saigon in 1975, an image that haunted Biden as he weighed a withdrawal earlier this year -- are certain to trail Biden as the Taliban asserts control over large swaths of the country.

Already, some members of Congress are demanding more information from the administration on how its intelligence could have so badly misjudged the situation on the ground, or why more robust contingency plans for evacuating Americans and their allies weren't in place.
During a briefing for lawmakers on Sunday, top administration officials faced harsh questioning over the withdrawal plans, including the evacuation of Afghan interpreters and others who assisted the US war effort.

House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy pushed the officials, including Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark Milley, on why the process happened so quickly.
"We didn't give them air cover. You say you had this plan. No one would plan out this outcome. The ramifications of this for America will go on for decades and it won't just be in Afghanistan," McCarthy said, according to a GOP source on the call.

Biden is not scheduled to return to the White House from Camp David until later this week and has not spoken publicly about the situation in Afghanistan since Tuesday. He has no events on his public schedule listed for Sunday.

A range of options are being debated -- about returning to Washington or addressing the nation -- but several officials said events were too fluid and no final decisions have been made as of Sunday afternoon.

While Biden can receive the same level of briefings from Camp David, as he has been doing throughout the weekend via a secure video conference, officials are aware of the optics of the President being out of town during this perilous moment. Several administration officials have also been on vacation, but began returning to work remotely Sunday or in the West Wing.

A White House official told CNN on Sunday that the President "has spoken to members of his national security team on the situation in Afghanistan and will continue to receive updates and be briefed throughout the day."
"He is deeply engaged from Camp David," one senior administration official said, who did not rule out the President returning to the White House.

The notion the civilian government led by former President Ashraf Ghani would be unable to withstand the Taliban's advances is not a surprise. Intelligence assessments over the past year have offered differing timetables for what was viewed by many national security officials as an inevitability.

Biden himself has said repeatedly over the last months, including when Ghani visited him in the Oval Office this summer, that Afghanistan's leaders would need to reconcile their differences if they had any hope of maintaining power.

And Blinken said Sunday that "we've known all along, we've said all along including the President, that the Taliban was at its greatest position of strength at any time since 2001 when it was last in charge of the country. That is the Taliban that we inherited. And so we saw they were very much capable of going on the offensive and beginning to take back the country."
Yet the downfall and collapse of the Afghan military has happened far quicker than Biden or his team expected.

Zenithpeak:
America will not occupy Afghanistan forever, there will be a time to evacuate and the time is now. We cannot change that!

Those Americans insinuating the likelihood of rise in terrorism act against America are truthful. Will America become a weak country simply because Talibans returns to power in their war torn country? Is it only when Afghanistan is occupied that their people can be protected from terrorism in their homes

Taliban wouldn't find it so easy to start wagging wars against world powers as soon he fully assume power. They would try as much as possible not to engage in form of full scale war in the next one decade... No cause for alarm!

The only task before America as a country is to review his foreign policies and tighten up lose ends, make more friends than enemies, place every known key persons in Iraq, Iran, Afghanistan, Oman, Qwait etc under close watch and watch over terrorism tendencies within their boarders.

All's well that ends well.

BafanaBafana:
Trump the ipob Messiah that year. He has found his voice.
On this very matter, Trump's plan has always been to pull US troops out of Afghanistan and Iraq.
It was also same Trump who pulled out US troops from the Syria Turkish border, leaving the Kurds who have been US allies at the mercy of the Turkish. Outright betrayal.
In my opinion, the Arabs should be left alone! Let them chart their own course. Every conflict in the middle east is either directly or indirectly related to the west.
Arabs should be left the f**k alone

kamilous:
Suspected Irigwe militias or suspected Christian terrorists?

Media is one of the problem of Nigeria!
And to those people giving Kudos to what these people did,ask your self if you have iota of conscience.
If it we're to be other way round,will you make such a reckless statement?
Anyway, ALL LIVES MATTER, irrespective of tribe and religion.
May God heal this nation.

MrColdsweat:

You're funny.

Martinelli wey carry all una defense play, or saka wey score wonderful goal against Chelsea, does that mean they are better than mount or ziyech?

How una Chelsea fans dey reason self?

Pumpumking:



Please go n looook for english lesssin teacher jorr...be for u start disgrasing Nigeria (goat)

uthlaw:
if he mark 10players,that is Chelsea problem...de bruyne is 100times better than kante!

uthlaw:
Kante can only mark....de bruyne is better than all of them!

MrColdsweat:

You're funny.

Martinelli wey carry all una defense play, or saka wey score wonderful goal against Chelsea, does that mean they are better than mount or ziyech?

How una Chelsea fans dey reason self?

MrColdsweat:


Busquet, kroos, casemiro....can I go on?

pacifust058:
All these Chelsea fans sef, only Kante can slot into any of the top six teams, the remaining players are more than shit

MrColdsweat:


Football is much more than tackles. Have you wondered why Milner is highly rated?

Milner can play every position on the pitch. And he plays it well. Milner spent a full year as a left back and gave 10 assists.

How is Kante better than Milner when Milner can play his DM position and even played the position AM where Kante struggled?