₦airaland Forum

person, if you want to show me a gay animal, make sure you have a brain and meet the following criteria:

a) The animals for the study must be in their natural setting hence nothing is forcing them to show unnatural traits as the aim of the research is to show a NATURAL behaviour.
b) The animals must have access to both sexes of animals for intercourse but yet specifically and exclusively choose same s3x intercourse over opposite gender intercourse.
c) The gay animals must be a sub-set of the animals, not all the animals, as this shows some where born gay and some straight, not an overly sexed specie.
d) The subset of gay animals must be decently large percentage of the animals and they frequently demonstrate this desire/behaviour. It is not a SINGLE, RARE OCCURRENCE which shows a crazed animal. Remember a crazed animal is not a gay animal. Otherwise all we have proved is that animals too have mad ones.
e) There is penetration and expulsion as this shows that it is actually a pleasurable se.xual intercourse that has resulted from AROUSAL of the mating animals and they want to get at it just like same s3x do.
f) Ideally also show that there is exhibition of mating rituals between the animals as this proves that those gays that behave (talk, dress, walk etc) like the opposite gender are not some demented souls but this criterion is relaxable as I know it is hard to show.
g) Ideally also show at least 10 different types of animals that demonstrate all these, but this is also relaxable because I am confident one cannot even be found.

f and g are relaxable so you don't claim I am stifling your moronic arsse!

wiegraf: Hmm....

Saga the mighty mouse, there's a little too much wrong here good ser. Don't think I can even cover it all in one go, I'll try for your sake. You genuinely are either particularly stoopid, disingenuous or a silly troll. I hope for your sake it's the latter.

Did you miss the bits were the lesbian birds are described as behaving like loving couples, indistinguishable from hetero couples, my infamous eddiot? The touching, playing, smooching and general cheesiness? All lovey dovey etc. At least you noticed that they raised eggs together and they remain as couples, some for as long as 18 years (as far back as their records go). Now, and this here is your ingenious moment, considering they are females, did you expect full blown co.itus? What would the dom use? Her beak as a Love Machine? I am aware that there are species were the females mount regardless of equipment, but these are particularly clumsy birds, she even notes how they waddle about. Why would they go out of their way to simulate coitus? Or even more bizarrely, as you seem to be suggesting, engage in actual coitus? How, you slowpoke?

Also note, mounting aimlessly would suggest they are just f.ucking instinctively for fun, or practice etc. In most of those scenarios they more or else just find the closest boilable thing or a teacher and mount it. What we have here instead is a clear case of the females requiring pipis just for the sp.erm they have, nothing more. All other needs are satisfied with their lesbian waifus, their clear preference. And without the simulated coitus, it could also mean they don't have the need to play out traditional gender roles as well (though I'll have to think/read on that to be sure, meh).


They also do go out of their way to point out they rarely actually see any coitus, hence their difficulties with figuring out how the lesbian females get impregnated. And I imagine since there's no way to differentiate their sexes without tagging, that could mean they only recently figured which birds were male and which were female, so they might have seen simulated coitus without actually knowing they did. Though this problem could be worked around depending on how they keep their records. And both these points don't really matter per se, ie if your argument is that there are no homosexual animals in nature hence homosexuality is something that needs to be cured (a patently silly argument). I just add them to show you what a doofus you are. The paragraphs above are all you need.


Lack of a preference for ghey activity was your former excuse to claim homosexuality does not occur in other species. Your excuse being animals will probably f.uck anything, but would default hetero if given a chance, yes? There you are with an article that clearly shows otherwise, yet you now require coitus from females?? Interesting, hmm. Anyways, like I already stated, 10% of rams prefer gay (I hope I at least don't have to point out rams are male, yes?). Famous penguins, etc as well. Hint, google 'exclusively homosexual animals' if you need more.

But I'll give you just a little more here though. They later describe some scientists that altered some flies and turned them ghey, and the 10% ghey rams have noticeably different brains from the rest of the population. So there you go a biological basis. Some animals can be born, or be modified to become, ghey.

Note though, this has virtually nothing to do with our non issue, homosexuality, that some eediots seem to think deserves intolerance. Homosexuality occurring or not in other species is irrelevant. People being born ghey or not is irrelevant. I'm just indulging you out of some sick perversion, I'm not sure what. I really shouldn't be wasting time educating you though.


Yes, and also, the scientists don't call any animals, even male gorillas gay enough to b.low each other, gay. For fairly obvious reasons I fear are beyond your comprehension level, as they are stated in the article.

You are a person!

Say "Yes, Sir".

I told you to show me gay animals you are telling me "described as behaving like loving couples". Is gay behaviour equals gay, cretin?

Foooool, you "imagined they might have"? That is your evidence. YOU ARE A person!

Show me animals that have no interest in the opposite s.ex like the gays we have.

person, and if you had any brains, your best and most convincing chance is to find animals that are close to humans. Cretin, PRIMATES!

But feel free to use any animal you can find that is gay, don't say Saga is restricting me. I am just advising your moronic arsse.

Don't come back here to show me animals exhibiting gay behaviours, show me gay animals! FOOOOOL!

[quote author=St.Ola]Are you so lost in religion that you still do not understand? The publisher had already forewarned of such embedded messages, so you have not revealed anything new. The idea is that no responsible parent would want to buy such pirated, albeit, cheap copies of the textbook. So I still ask, beyond being very vulgar for very good reasons, What is demonic in the said message?

I have also understood why Nigerian religious nut-jobs are the way they are. They apply religious thoughts to very secular issues.[/quote]AH!!! Okay. That is the tactic?

The publishers purposely put something that is occulticly cryptic because they know religiously-mad Nigerians who are likely to photocopy rather than buy it, would be shyt-scared of demons if they saw a photocopy.

Fcking brilliant copyright tactics!

I wish I thought of that myself. Genius!

wonlasewonimi: Yeah.



When the warden comes into the cell the morning after the escape, the poster covering the hole is fastened down on all four corners - impossible to do after squeezing into that small hole. [On the DVD commentary, the director confirms that this was a movie "cheat".]


a good film tho!

Anything else?

wonlasewonimi: How did he escape and managed to put the lovely poster back from tunnel?

You mean putting the poster back up after escaping?

wonlasewonimi: duh! and the most unrealistic film ever.

What makes it unrealistic?

elrony: Lol ultimate badt guy... u no wan miss chance lyk yakubu

You understand!

I will make her blush and sexually charged but yet she is laughing so hard.

The Kukere "Iye, Iye, Iye, Iye, Iye" will turn to a soft sexually charged "Ye, Ye, Ye, Ye, Ye" behind her in my manly voice (those that have heard my voice know what I am talking about).

Toolz come to Saga.

[quote author=Ileke-IdI]Lol shey you get that waist? [/quote]How do you think I became the fuku faka maestro?

[quote author=Ileke-IdI]Na wa for Toolz ooooooooooooo

She was all over that lol

I love the girl sha. [/quote]You should come and flirt with me like that.

Sho ti gbo? Wa gba Olorun loga! (You don hear? You will take God as the Lord!)

naijababe: You never drink Sagamu water today, this one na cretin behaviour o

I scan read. Basically, that involves only special focus on mentally selected names and short posts.

Some people had been derailing with their chit-chats, so I only scan read this thread.

I read yours and read the post you were referring to. I did not read what came after that.

slimyem: ^^i know..and i'm just saying that since you sleep off generally while watching movies,that you don't sleep off while watching Shawshank is the irony as the movie itself is as good as Valium 5 or any other barbiturate for one who isn't a movie person like yourself.

You have no taste.

Best film ever made, hands down.

It is even on my own interview list too.

elrony: Lwkmd Ashawo...raz dude!

This na the interview!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzaZGz3isr4

So many points he could have teased her: "Iyanya you are sexy", "You wanted the meaty ladies", "The ladies were well endowed", "You have a relationship with Yvonne Nelson"

COME ONE! That is Toolz, tease HER! FCKING FLIRT!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Q6RgHz3FcY

Na me Toolz go say "come dance behind me" and I go dey blush?

When she says that the kind of pause followed by a naughty dirty but cute grin I would give her would make her start giggling and saying in her mind "I am sure this guy is crazily naughty".

Then I would tell her "That is actually the best way for a woman to learn it" then motion her to come here [pointing to my front]. She gets there, then my hands at the top of her waist while professionally telling her how to whine by following subconciously the movement of my waist that is now closely attached to hers like siamese twins.

Then will come the jovial sexually-pregnant ad libs I would give until she starts blushing and the producers have to signal behind the camera that "You guys cool down, we need to be able to pass Nigeria broadcasting regulation and rules. This will not be allowed to be shown in Kano if we are not careful".

Emi lo fe ba flirt? Won bi e da! (Na me she wan flirt with? Dem no born am well)

Viewing this topic: wiegraf, bigdoo and 3 guest(s)

Don't run. I have seen you.

Virgin Finder: You are a slavic bastard!

Why didn't you just upload the picture of your parents' neighbourhood back in Sagamu to prove your point rather than go all the way to Anambra?

That Nigerian houseboys and housegirls abroad do have passports should say a lot to your slavic brain.But it just wouldnt.

It appears you are the first person in your family to travel into slavery. Damn!

You are doomed to destruction.From slavery to the white man to hell fire.

You better come and attend the Holy Ghost Congress today so that you can be saved and delivered from the home trouble/curse afflicting you or better still follow it on the internet (of course you cant afford the ticket)

Keep whining. obo!

Fuckard, does your neighbourhood look better than that?

Your life is better in Nigeria na?

elrony: Lol madt man..so u dey eye toolz abi?..dat gurl cleavage na kilimanjaro ,sexy!

That girl set die!

And, to me, it was obvious Iyanya's game was not that tight because he did not know how to flirt back. She was flirting openingly and it was obvious she was in control of the interaction and owned him.

If na me the girl they flirt with, she for know who be champion flirter and who controls the flirtation process.

I would make her blush so hard on TV the producers will direct the runner/assistant to get towels to wipe the floor between her legs.

Iyanya was the one blushing.

Let her come and interview Professional Ashawo.

[quote author=yemmy_ma]This argument would have been made easier if we had data to look at. But i'd be surprised if the U.K. is really up there as you have explained looking at the average.[/quote]You want comparable data?

That is not too hard.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_average_wage

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_sovereign_states_in_Europe_by_minimum_wage

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_sovereign_states_in_Europe_by_net_average_wage


Honestly, this is not rocket science. It is very easy to ratiocinate it. I did not even check the salaries before I made the assumption because it is so obvious.

It is like me wasting my time checking if Brazil has one of the highest number of win ratios in the history of Copa America.

There is a reason why all the Poles, Romanians, Lithuaians etc head for the UK.

mruknaijaboy: Lol its funny how all these guys are saying he isnt fine like they better than him lol

i bet 90% of guys in here are worse looking than inyanya yet their mouth is sharp to diss him

oya every guy who dissing iyanya in here put your pictures up make we judge una,I need some laughter to ease the stress off of my uni work

No mind dem!

The guy no only fine pass dem, e fit take their wife.

The only time wey I dey beef the guy was when my Toolz was obviously flirting with him in an interview. The guy dey take my wife. Pissed me off!

Kay 17: Obviously male fish ban.ging make fish. Besides most homosexuals don't do anal sex surprisingly.

I would have challenged you on this but I really don't want to know what disgusting thing they do.

wiegraf: On the very first page, oh ignorant one

And now you tell me to understand the meaning of the word 'natural'. Hmm. I was going to ask, but I remember a certain eediot who could not define 'gay' when asked. You're a fine breed of unadulterated m.oron.
The rest of the post is, as expected, nonsense.

You're the worst kind of ignorant, the one that's ostensibly not. To make your posts more colorful, figure out another way to say 'fu.cktard', maybe that would mask your st.oopid.

Edit: you're off? Not particularly looking forward to our next meet but meh. Maybe you'd have codified the religion of sagatardation and fu.cktardry to use as a means to justify your position by then. Good luck

The 2 person hyenas that I was calling out throughout yesterday and they were running like sissies waited till I went to bed to start screaming "where is the Lion"?

Even the cretin called logic boy that was avoiding answering a question got all boastful and more confident and finally screamed "there are gay animals".

Logicboy03: Lolz



Sagamite is losing it!!! v


You have been debunked. There are gay animals and you are yet to put a logical argument forward against gays!


Shameful

So you believe there are gay animals but you could not answer my question asking you that simple question yesterday for over 2 hours until you saw another hyena show up and you confidence grew?



Pussyclats!

Now lets have a BURN FIRE!

So person wiefgraf, I said you should show me gay animals and you went to bring me an article (after running for hours) late in the night where this is in it:

Young would never use the phrase “straight couples.” And she is adamantly against calling the other birds “lesbians” too. For one thing, the same-sex pairs appear to do everything male-female pairs do [size=14pt]except have s.ex[/size], and Young isn’t really sure, or comfortable judging, whether that technically qualifies them as lesbians or not.

So let me summarise:

1) Even the article itself and the scientitst do not claim the animals are gay.

2) The birds do not have sex.

3) The birds incubate eggs which was produced through sex.

So, person, that is your evidence that they are gay animals?

You are a person! Say "Yes, Sir"!

Your evidence of gay animals is to show us birds that are exhibiting gay behaviours, not ones that are gay.

You are a person!

Come back here for your roasting!

I would not even worry about the person called Logicboy03 because I know his liver would have gone by now and he would be running. He would wait till the lion is sleeping before he starts ranting and giving opinions.

wiegraf: I would have thought he'd have learned new words as well.

Has he given a reason yet for supporting the ban on homosexuality yet? Maybe he wants to form some sort of religion to justify his position

You! You are toast by tomorrow if I have the time or saturday.

You ran today but it is good your ego is moronically big.

Logicboy03: The guy has no shame. He doesnt accept evidence that there are homosexual animals and he doesnt want to give a logical argument against gays because he has none.


Empty barrel.

Sagadunce

You are a person!

Run!

Pussyclat! That is what you are used to anytime I prepare your oven.

Your intellect is too low and you are scared.

wiegraf: Sagamite, you du.mb $hit, of course gay means homosexual.

There is plenty gay activity in the animal kingdom, that is undeniable. So long as the act is pleasurable, why should animals, unfettered by dogma unlike you (even if only subconsciously), not do it? This alone shows you the folly of settling this debate using non human animal behavior. Why? They aren't conscious or intelligent, which leads to questionable behavior, like their killing babies. They operate, most of the time, solely on instinct. You haven't explicitly stated that your stance on human homosexuality is based around other animal behavior though so I can let this go.

So ghey sex documented everywhere.

As for exclusively gay animals, which is what your inane argument will revolve around (and which is what I wanted you to explicitly specify your royal retar.dness, hence the question), it is not as common, but still exists in the animal kingdom. Famous penguin same sex couples are known for instance. Roughly 10% of rams would rather ghey sex. 33% of a flock of albatross and a lot more documented cases are mentioned in this article

www.nytimes.com/2010/04/04/magazine/04animals-t.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

So, what's next from your ignorance?

And why do you think my whole world revolves around educating you? The only thing I've noticed you deduce correctly is my ego probably won't let your silly a$$ off free. If you'll excuse me though, that article is actually interesting so I'll be digesting it for a bit. Resume your fu.cktardry

You are a person!

So your moronic arsse waited till late into the night when I would soon be heading to bed to come out from hiding despite constantly being on the viewing list?

Is gay behaviours in animals evidence of animals being gay?

Your moronic arsse does not know there is nothing we are that is natural that is not in the animal world?

Let me protect you from making a moronic statement by warning you in advance so you don't get too burnt to eat: understand the meaning of natural before you comment on it.

Show me or direct me to where there are exclusively gay animals. And don't give me a tome in the middle of the night after you ran for hours. Dig out the area of the article you think validate your point and post it.

Cretin!

Logicboy03: Empty barrel has no argument. Empty barrel doesnt read people's comments properly then talks nonsense;

You are a person!

What is the valid point? Why is it a valid point?

That is not your comment, that is someone's article, person!

Lets hear your comment:

Do you still claim there are gay animals?

And what is your moronic argument for homosexuality and why we should not ban it in Nigeria?

Pussyclat!


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xs39_dGIlWo

ashmanpolo: Cretin slang-up little soldier

Product of a failed education system in a country where education is critical. The girl get eye for market.

Logicboy03: Empty barrel says what?


Lol.....empty barrels have no arguments. They just shout "person"

Shut up, person!

You just run after you run your mouth and the suya fire is set up from you!

You know I will intellectually suya you and you run.

person,

Do you still claim there are gay animals?

And what is your moronic argument for homosexuality and why we should not ban it in Nigeria?

Easy questions! Answer with an answer!

Answer and be barbecued!

You know how to run your mouth until Saga challenges you to state your opinion.

You scared?

Logicboy03: https://www.nairaland.com/1131108/female-fish-attracted-gay-males/2#13377957

Sagamite didnt give a logical argument after the above quote.



Who is the real person?

You are a person answer simple questions and stop running.

Do you believe there are gay animals or not?

Cretin provides an article and then says: "Still it remains a valid point".

What is a valid point? What is your clear opinion, foool!

You think you are smart? You want to Kobojunkie up?

Answer the gaddamn questions, cretin!

Pussyclat!

ashmanpolo: Mehn, no man is optimally complete dats why i keep grading myself on nineties in terms of percentage. I've seen lotta girls chat on m̶̲̥̅ƹ even when i act a snub, admire, humour, tease, trip etc like my girl will do also to anyone she feels meet up to her bla bla bla... So the low esteem stuff is so not the ish here aite. The question is simply ♓☺w guys see ϑis act.

You are a person!

With your atrocious use of english grammar, no wonder the girl dey find better thing.

Viewing this topic: mrscolite(f), Tlake(m), Sagamite(m) and 7 guest(s)

Logicboy03: @ bold....Did you even read my comment? Smh



[size=14pt]Ladies and gentlemen, there you have it. Sagamite has no logical argument against gays. None
[/size]


I have shown beyond doubt that Sagamite is an empty barrel that deosn even read others' comments before shouting "person". Also he has no logical arguments goodbye.

You can have the last word

You are a person!

RUN!!!

You think you are smart? Instead of answering a simple question about your position, you want to give an ambigious, non-commital answer so after you are nailed, you can repudiate your position and say it was the author's.

Cretin.

Do you believe there are gay animals or not?

And what is your argument why we should legalise homosexuality then?

Easy questions!

Pussyclat!

Logicboy03: Strawman again. Notice how Sagamite never makes an argument just laying strawmen and abuse. Have I argued here for homosexual animals?


I hardly even mention homosexuality in animals as an argument. I always give logical rebuttals to failed claims against gays. Homosexuality in animals is mentioned as an additional point. Still it remains a valid point.

http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2FBF01541216?LI=true




However, Sagamite has never given a logical argument against gays. This is the last time I will ask you.


I dont deal with dubious apologists. Anonyism. Give us a logical argument against gays. If not shut the hell up

You are a person!

So you don't believe there are gay animals? You admit no animal is gay?

So what is your argument why we should legalise homosexuality then?

I asked your moronic arsse a question and you want to return it with a question.