Scholar8200's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Scholar8200's Profile › Scholar8200's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 113 114 115 116 117 118 (of 118 pages)
finofaya:your response to No 1 already tells me not to bother for 2 & 5, you will most likely pick holes ( using principles that cant be correctly applied even in secular issues but are used here because they'll help for that purpose). 3.There are many Names pointing to the Messiah- Isaiah 9:6, Zechariah 3:8. 4. We cant rewrite the history of a Nation for them.It's good that the nation in question is still in existence and has this event and other miraculous ones in their history.. By the way, the occurrence happened more than two millenia ago before the advent of the AD calendar. |
theAtheist101:GOD is the Eternal,Self - Existent One. Well, you are right, I wont assume answers that are not in the Bible. also, thinking outside the Bible does not mean your hypothesis is correct. But the devil has a beginning not as the devil but as an angel, perfect in beauty- But for the animals, all creatures have their choice, and I think God was fair by that. Hence submission to Him will be by personal choice and not compulsion. The devil desired God's glory and enlisted the help of some subordinate angels all of which were hurled out from Heaven. The devil has his time, that he runs amok now doesnt mean God cant handle him, even his subordinates continually pleaded with Jesus not to destroy them before the time Mark 1:24 Matthew 8:29. just like any other creature, he has no other realm while time lasts. his time is coming and that of all those who, like the angels he swayed, followed him in his rebellion. |
theAtheist101:The earth existed before Adam's creation so that calculation may not be accurate. This (Adam being short of one rib) is your assumption, bear in mind that it was not done by a surgeon. Now you wonder why God (Who you see as being unpleasant) shows mercy to a truly repentant sinner? Because He is merciful and has no pleasure in the death of a sinner provided the latter will turn away(not just confess) from sins in repentance. |
finofaya:Jesus did not only lay down His life but He took it up again: He rose up from the grave, Seen by about 500 people one of which insisted on seeing the place where the spear entered and he was shown! Why? The requirement of GOD's judgement we all deserved had been satisfied and Jesus had no sin of His. Isaiah 53 The nations Israel was sent to destroy were peers with the people of the ante-deluvian period, in abominations and must have spurned warnings just as the former spurned warnings from Enoch and Noah. Note that it was an act of judgement and when Israel too fell into the same abominations, despising warnings from God, they got the same judgement from God through other nations. Surely not at par with terrorists claim e.g Babylon as 2 Chronicles 36:14-21 moreover all the . . . People transgressed much after all the abominations of the heathen. . . And the Lord sent to them (warning)by His messengers. . . because He had compassion on His people. . . But they mocked the messengers and despised His Words and misused His prophets . . . till there was no remedy. . . (there's always an effort to warn eg Jonah was sent to warn Nineveh - a heathen nation) This is unlike the terrorists who kill others while committing sins viler than that of their victims. It's bloodlust. |
finofaya:Well you requested five: Daniel ch 8:20-22 prophesied the conquering of Medo- persian empire by the Grecian and this occured under Alexander the great, in fact the prophecy speaks of a rough goat which interestingly was the symbol of Alexander. It talks of 4 kingdoms arising after Alexander and even history attests to the fact that after his death, the kingdom was divided among his 4 lieutenants. 2. Daniel 8:23 &11:21-45 spoke proximately of the man Antiochus Epiphanes prophesied pls refer to any website that has his history. 3. Isaiah 7:14 described the Conception of Jesus which was fulfilled in Luke 1:26-35. 4. Genesis 15:13 God told Abraham of the Egyptian bondage of 400 years that took off after 30years of sojourn in Exodus 1 some centuries after. 5. Revelations 13:15-18 tells of the mark of the beast and if you'll google 666 today I'm sure you'll be inundated with info. Already, there is a subtle climaxing of technology in that direction. The emphasis is smaller devices now even a chip but it's now at the test running stage. Rather He reveals Himself to all that seek Him sincerely and objectively. You dont need to help Him reveal Himself i.e. assume or think this or that 'feeling' is Him.. When He does you will know Him. |
theAtheist101:The question on Who God is is not that which can be delineated in a single NL post. He is introduced in Genesis as the Creator and Sustainer. (let me stop here for now) God is not a creature but the Creator. Sorry what do you mean by manual of life? If it's what I'm thinking, there are things that are the exclusive preserve of any leader and no subject complains of that not being in order (except for the rebellious subjects), GOD has such too. As regards Omnipotence, realise that in life there are only two parts - Good and Evil. God knows the end of the Good because the same is designed by Him; He also knows the end of the evil because the devil's plans are not hid from God, finally He knows our hearts (the place of our affection and will whence thoughts that controls us spring) and by this knowledge knows what our thoughts and choices will be. For example after God had delivered Israel b4 Moses' departure, God had this to say: Deuteronomy 31:21b for I know their imagination which they go about , even now, before I have brought them into the land. In other words some Israelites were already toying with the idea of disobedience. God knows our hearts but does not control it against our will hence He admonishes and warns either personally or through others , "see I have set b4 you . . Life and good, and death and evil . . Therefore choose life that . . . You may live. The ultimate choice is ours but the consequences are also ours and if we've influence, it may affect them too for either options (leadership is a great responsibility).. And that is why the Bible says keep your heart with all diligence for out of it are the issues of life. Any sincere, unbiased question on God's omnipotence should be covered by this framework. |
Mikwus:thanks for your response. Mary was declared by the angel to be highly favored & this was expressed by her being chosen to be the mother of our Lord Jesus Christ. Now, how will you describe the expression of this undeserved favor in man. |
emrain: ![]() |
theAtheist101:Now, it would be nice if you could prove your version of the earth's correct age and then give the wrong age written in the Bible (quotes will help substantiate this) Yes the ages of men were given expressly but pls show me where that of the earth is. Women had fewer ribs? Number of women's ribs not shown in any Bible else show us that too( stated expressly) indeed nothing was said about that of men either. Murdering anyone that crosses His path? Pls mention the people you have in mind who were not consistently warned. (we condemn human govt when public money thieves are not prosecuted and we wonder why God judges those who, inspite of warnings, remained adamant!) Forgiving infinitely in New testament? The same God forgave a whole nation (Nineveh) that repented; forgave David when he repented; was willing to spare Sodom & Gomorrah if just 10 righteous people were found, there fiendish vileness notwithstanding; forgave king Ahab the murderer when he, realising his evil deed, repented; declared judgment on a Jezebel in Church who refused to repent (revelation 2:21,22, New testament); denounced hardened pharisees who by their covetousness, corrupted the truth Matthew 23 etc I can logically say this debunks your claim. regards. |
@ op, pls how would you define grace? |
theAtheist101:I believe subsequent posts answer your allegation. |
finofaya:Well apart from Herod (who beheaded John the baptist and James and also took his brother's wife unjustly and whose cup of iniquity became full) who took the place of God, I cant recall the other 'people' smitten for blasphemy. Job's testing (not punishment, even Job knew and confessed same Job 23:10) was the devil's activit. God's twofold restoration of all that was lost after the testing was over, clarifies this. Note that it's not all times God allows the devil to do such ,a good example is when Balaam wanted to curse Israel but God refused and nothing was done. But the same Jesus said , ...I lay down my life that I might take it again, no man takes it from Me but I lay it down of Myself' (Isaiah, some centuries back, prophesied of His birth in Isaiah 7:14 and death in Isaiah 53) and that is why on the night of arrest, He pointed out that He could ask for and receive (from the Father) twelve legions of angels for His deliverance but for the former declaration and the prophecies He came to fulfil. Apart from Pharaoh,there was no Bible character that God dealt with after that pattern, a close look at the prophecy God gave to Abraham about this, centuries before it took place, gives us a clue viz Genesis 15:16b, Pharaoh's period of grace had passed. Lot's wife and son-in-laws were all warned and told what to do but they disobeyed. Did similar thing happen to Lot and his two daughters who obeyed? The nation Israel was sent to destroy were iron cast in abominations (Deut. 18:12,10 etc) that will make an average man today shudder, just like those in Noah's day (note that Noah did more than build the ark quietly, God also made him and Enoch preach(2Peter 2:5, Jude 1:14) and warn the people of judgement if they didnt repent; just like Jonah was sent to warn Nineveh but they repented and judgement was halted) and I believe they had their chance too but they chose to rebel still (though some like Rahab who surrendered was spared). As regards the bolded I wonder if One who (for example) will condescend to admonish an angry Cain Genesis 4:6,7 on the need to avoid malice and tell him what to do to be accepted, will be regarded as having 'huge ego'. Or how One Who, haven been repeatedly disregarded by man accept same (Ezekiel 33:11)when they repent, be of 'hot temper'? |
finofaya:First, thanks for the bolded however it's not best to resort to expletives simply because you dont understand something just like the issue at hand.If you go through most genealogies, this is not to mean that there were no females born at such times. Else we should wonder where, Noah, Enoch etc got their wives from. As regards the occurrences, if you care to, try a study on Jewish history and use any other book except the Bible. Saying history attests (referring to the events you find ridiculous) is my way of leaving out much biblical quotes since your mind is made up already. Talking of prophecies, I would need your go ahead to list those since I am not sure your comment suggests that you want the list. Notify if I am wrong I will be glad to list them. Yes, if I am the only one making claims then ignore such but if millions from history down to the contemporary times make similar claims what then? |
urheme:kindly substantiate the bolded statement in the light of Romans 10:17,14 15:4, Acts 17:10-13 1 Peter 2:2, Colossians 4:16 2 Timothy 3:16 Revelations 22:18,19. Regards |
finofaya:But how do you dismiss the glaring reality of these 'stories and myths' when the names & places mentioned therein, occurences etc are still in existence today and the occurrences (backed by detailed genealogies) are clearly stated in the history of the nation concerned. We may call them stories but history attests to the fact that they actually occurred and all characters mentioned God inclusive are not fictitious. Prophecies and their obvious fulfilment in history, and in present times also stands as an able,eloquent defendant here. See these things are highly verifiable except if you choose to hold on to your atheistic stance sans evidence. Also, it will be strange to write off the testimony of myriads of people all through history down to contemporary times, of their experience with God. Concerning blasphemies and God's silence, even mature men know that you dont need to deal with every kid or nagging woman that calls your bluff,that will be an easy manipulative procedure. God's nature is such that HE gives you time to repent and will not reduce that time in a fit of rage. And the issue of unpleasantness of God, well, note that choices come with a seed called consequence. We cant take one and reject the other. Why then would we blame another for the consequence of our choices? And will you say a judge is unpleasant if he sentences a defiant murderer to death? Or would you consider a leader unpleasant if, after repeated warnings, deals with offenders (this was one of the weakness of GEJ which made many opt for the seemingly incorruptible pres.-elect). When you talk of God being an unpleasant Deity it means you have chosen (your choice which only you can change) to close your eyes to His goodness and also the fact that those acts perceived to be acts of unpleasantness where simply the consequences of the actions of, and judgement deserved by those involved not without sufficient warnings and time to repent. Atheists do a lot of reasoning and I believe you need to apply the same mental process, with an unbiased mind to all these. Logic tells us that the conclusion should follow from the premise now most premises you alluded to are either 1. Personal opinions not subjected to a balanced literature review. (most unsafe because of its subjective nature) 2. Uninformed assumption (deliberately ignoring the objective testimony of history as regards these things). The afore statement points to a root cause - anger/bitterness against God and belief in Him. Reminiscent of how the council that sentenced Jesus to death had already passed their verdict but still sought for witnesses which Pilate, being objective, discerned was an action motivated by envy. |
If indeed your focus of attack is the belief of others (though myriads of nairaland posts refutes this) , how do you separate a person's belief from the Person believed in? Why attack? Attacking presupposes the existence of an inner grudge or malicious intent. Quite similar to what the terrorists do when they attack those who dont believe what they believe (of course we all condemn this) only yours is on a mental level. And then what is your goal in attacking? Perhaps it gives vent to the inner grudge against God! Constant resorting to blasphemous statements is reminiscent of how some Nigerians resorted to using various derogatory names for the outgoing administration simply because they felt pained, and how some citizens the world over react to their Govt when they are not happy.The use of this analogy is because it's the secular example all can relate with. And if you'll be sincere, you'll agree with me that majority of atheists have focused on GOD not those ones you mentioned. Voltaire, Paine, etc never levelled their attacks against the other idols as far as I know. Even NL atheists are more against the Christian God. You see underlying all claims and 'proofs' is the same rebellion. |
From what I've read so far on this column and NL, atheists (if there ever was such) are not people who say there is no GOD but rather people who hate or are bearing serious hostility to God for one reason or the other or who are contemptuous against God and are seeking more reasons to do so. But all this wont be directed against a nought would it. Now for example when GEJ won 2011 elections, boko haram came out to say they dont recognise his govt that's because there was one which GEJ was to head(to atheists reading this, this is not to liken you to them, just an analogy) they made good their threat but it did not change the fact but rather proved that there was a govt in place. One of the atheists in Nigeria the late Tai Solarin became one (according to info I got) simply because God did not grant him a particular petition. Another pastor whose case was shown on NL, became an atheist because God had not given him the car of his choice and others on NL who accentuated the wounded pastor's new decision in their comments also alluded to the same problem of asking but not getting something. (Now even natural parents do not give their kids everything they ask for) etc. The aggressiveness, unleashing of harsh words (which should follow this topic:-)) and ruthless attack against any thing about God or the Bible only proves that These things are real others are more reserved but adamantly negative and would have nothing to do with God . It seems to me that the atheist is one who, having not had his way with God on some point or who, upon seeing something he did not understand in scripture etc had gone ahead to declare Him non existent. That's why they must needs remain in the religion section on NL else another section wont make much meaning because there'll be nothing much to say, no believer in God to bash with the vilest of hate speeches this being a vent for the bile of hatred they have for GOD. Inspite of the arguments they give, you can easily see that most of their premise, facts are one-sided and are obviously not an effort in searching but an activity in substantiating a predetermined conclusion. An objective search to prove the existence of God and the Bible being His Word viz a viz lives and death of true believers in church history (not the false prophet fruit rampant today) should satisfy an objective seeker. Well, God loves you still and will receive you if you will repent and surrender your lives to Christ. |
Papist:Welcome to this conversation, I could not help but note the contradiction in the quote : both are outside the Body hence the same punishment but different degrees Luke 12:47,48. That is why Christ's message b4 Ascension was the need to preach to every creature because there are only two categories - he that believes and he that believes not. God who reached out to Cornelius in Acts 10 and Ethiopian eunuch in Acts 8:26,29-40 has a way of drawing the Ignorant to Himself but a lot depends on two people: the Ignorant who may accept or reject , and the Church who may fail to obey ( though Peter and Philip obeyed in the quotes above) but many in the Church are failing today. Note that the angel told devout Cornelius to seek for Peter who'll give him the gospel that he may be saved (ACTS 10:6, 11:14) implication being that his devoutedness (limited due to ignorance) was not an excuse b4 God. |
eugy45:Note that Christ did not direct His Message in the Book of Revelations 2 & 3 to the pope or any other sole church leader but to the local leaders of those seven churches. Besides, your last statement contradicts the biblical quotes that showed that Christ is the Rock except the words and experiences of men now rank at the same level with the Word. Secondly, the books of the Old testament existed before year 001 AD, the prophecies of most of which (including Isaiah 28:16 prophesying of Christ being the Rock and affirmed by Peter in 1 Peter 2:6-9) were fulfilled in Christ (though some are yet to be fulfilled while others are being fulfilled before our eyes) and even Christ (Luke 24:44) and the other apostles and prophets used these OT books in their inspired messages and writings (read most messages in the Acts to prove this . Now before the compilation of the Bible today, early Christians ," continued steadfastly in the apostles' doctrine" (Acts 2:42) as Inspired by the Spirit (note the plural). This apostles' doctrine is what is now codified in the Gospels and Epistles. even at that time they upheld the word hence Paul wrote," Galatians 1 :8 ...though we ,or an angel from heaven, preach any other Gospel unto you than that which we have preached, let him be accursed. |
eugy45:Pls we need to be cautious here. Remember Revelations 22:18,19 . . . if any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book, and if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the Book of Life.... Proverbs 30:6 Add thou not unto His words lest He reprove thee. See also Deuteronomy 4:2, 12:32. Although John the beloved pointed out that Jesus did many other things after resurrection which he did not include in the book of John,see John 20:30 but vs 31 tells us that God has given us enough to enlighten and quicken those who will believe. The Bible supersedes any decision handed down by any man or committee of men. For example, In the time of Luther, a particular RC official (Tetzel, I think) went as far as saying those who contributed money to a certain course will rescue a/some loved one from hell and translate them to Heaven (total heresy that!), and the RC church authorities did not stop him. In fact Matthew 16:18 , the Rock there is not referring to Peter but the Truth of Jesus being the Christ, the Son of the Living God. 1 Corinth 3:11 For other Foundation can no man lay than that which is laid which is Jesus Christ pls see Ephesians 2 :20 Jesus Christ Himself being the Chief Cornerstone.,Isaiah 28:16 Matt 21:42. Even Peter himself wrote referring to Christ 1Peter 2:6-8 wherefore it is contained in the Scripture, Behold I lay in Zion a Chief Corner Stone, Elect,Precious; and he that believeth on Him shall not be confounded... the Stone which the builders disallowed, the Same is made the Head of the corner. |
[quote author=bushdoc9919 post=32646313][/quote]Nice post. Furthermore, Isaiah 14:13 describes the angels as the stars of God and Lucifer was their overall leader hence I see morning star as a title to distinguish the masterpiece ( Ezekiel 28:12-16) star or angel from the others. Daniel 12:3b Matthew 13:43 shows that the saints will also shine like the stars or the sun but Christ's glory will outshine that of any saint in Heaven hence the title Bright and Morning Star. |
eugy45:pls would you substantiate the doctrinal statement you opened this post with and the Bull quoted above with Scriptures and samples in the New Testament. Also note that in Revelations 2 and 3, Jesus sent messages to 7 different churches or assemblies of believers through their pastors. This is not in tandem with your opening quote. |
@ op , pls salvation is through repentance from sin and faith in Christ sacrifice on the cross Acts 20:21 the statement in John 6:54 was not made in relation to the Eucharist. Looking at vs 56-57, you'll see that the context here and the allusion to His dependence on the Father was the focus. When the Eucharist was initiated, the purpose was to do it ,"in remembrance of Me" Luke 22:19. Also, Acts 2:46 shows that the breaking of bread was done in families, the 12 Apostles could not have been going to their houses and after they were scattered in Acts 8, i'm sure each family had to do it on their own. I wish you could substantiate the need for an ordained priest as stated in your post. The Ethiopian eunuch in Acts 8 only believed and was baptised and was saved. |
beejaay:No problem. Actually the reply was directed at the op's post. |
Hebrews 2:14-16 Forasmuch then as the children are partakers of flesh and blood, He also Himself likewise took part of the same that through death He might deliver them. . . For verily He took not on Him the nature of angels . . . Hence the salvation and forgiveness is only available for man. |
@op well, you come across as one who'd only believe a fact which is the outcome of an empirical procedure and/or a well-documented research. In responding to your treatise, I'd like to refer to Bible passages but note that the stories therein can be substantiated if you'll apply the same rigorous academic procedure howbeit with an objective mind. I start with a statement in Job 11:7 canst thou by searching find out God? This simply clarifies that we err ab initio when we embark on a search for God armed with nothing but our five senses and what others have discovered with same. The world was created and runs on God's ordinances and laws eg Gen 1:14 that speaks of the sun being a sign for days, years etc which has been established by Geography Genesis 8:22 while the earth remains, seedtime and harvest, and cold and heat, and summer and winter, and day and night shall not cease. But this does not mean God cannot interrupt these laws afterall HE made them(eg withholding rain in time of Elijah and giving rain after prayer). Now man was created to subdue the earth hence a lot of discoveries are still being made which contrary to your view establishes the fact that GOD is. Take for example the issue of sphericity of the earth, b4 geography told us about this, Isaiah already under inspiration said Isaiah 40:22 It is HE that sits upon the CIRCLE of the earth. This was centuries b4 geography came to say same. And regarding DNA discoveries , Genetically Modified crops Genesis 1:12 reveals that. . . The earth brought forth grass and herb yielding seed . . . And the tree yielding fruit, whose seed was in itself, after his Kind ( I believe this applies to the reproductive germ in man too). The point of all this is that the natural did not replace the supernatural rather it clearly shows that these ordinances were extant but are just being discovered now. Now I dont know of any who ever described laws of Gravity, seasons, etc as supernatural! The multiplicity of parallel religions and the seeming diminishming of God(!) and feebleness of the argument of apologetics might not be sufficient ground to draw your conclusion. Why? Note that we wont have many fake currencies or products if there was no original. And the original I know is the Faith of Christ. Now Christianity stands on the fact that The Lord Jesus said, I am The Way (not a way) . . . No man comes to the Father but by Me(no room for other religion's claims here) John 14:6 if you'll get a bible and objectively, with the same analytical mind consider the Matthew, Mark. Etc viz a viz study history and archaeology, which will prove that there was once such a Person on earth, viz a viz other religion and their claims, i believe you'll see things differently. If those who try to speak for God fail to confront issues like you expect, it will not be a valid conclusion to say He does not exist. Yes, christians of this day have failed much largely due to our prayerlessness. It will still be illogical to pass the verdict of non existence. GOD will reveal Himself to you if you will sincerely ask Him to. However if you look to creatures to do such, op, you might be disappointed. |
osina1414:At op, I'd like to answer these in the same order: 1. Church refers to the Body Of Christ and it consists of individual believers (eg the Revelations starts with Christ's message to the churches it could only have meant body of believers) who have repented and surrendered their lives to Christ. It's not the building. If the RCM believes it's the only church, it does not mean that point is true! 2. For the prophecy came not . . . By the will of man, but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost. 2 Peter 1:21 the claim of being the source of the Bible is refuted by this. Also see 2 Timothy 3:16. 3. I know there are RCM members reading this and all I will say is that any one naming the Name of Christ and attending Any Church should like the Bereans study the Word and if your Church in any respect contradicts the Word, the latter should supersede. 4. Not all books were inspired eg Joshua 10:13 speaks of Jasher not included in bible etc some were purely historical or records and writings by scribes. I believe both the Writing and Canonisation of Books in Scripture was Inspired by God. 5. The last book of Moses - Deuteronomy ended with the death of Moses hence I dont think those mysticals were from him. Also, the theme of the 6th and 7th books of Moses agrees not with the Message in the Pentateuch. In conclusion, they were not written by Moses. 7. Yes, you see these are days when false prophets are in large supply. Bible even says they'll make merchandise of those who follow them 2 Peter 2:1-3 but there are still faithful ones today. Also, it wont be right to generalise as regards all the members as been poor while all pastors are rich. |
shahydbinaliyu:thanks for your attention pls hear me patiently. The New testament (just like the Old) was ratified by blood but not of animals but Jesus said (Matt 26:28, Mark 14:24, Luke 24: 44,46,47) and one of the reasons is because Jer prophesied about forgiveness and remission of sins being part of the New Testament and without shedding of blood there is no remission of sin. But it does not stop there. Jer further prophesied in d txt I quoted that GOD will put His laws in our inward parts and write it in our hearts Ezekiel 36:27 goes further to reveal that God will put His Spirit within us and cause us to walk in His statutes and do them. Once a person believes the Gospel, repents of sin and surrenders to Christ, these things take place but his freewill to choose if he'll live by the Spirit's leading or reject (and be condemned). Now pls understand that the law of Moses consists the ceremonial and the moral. The former was fulfilled in Christ hence we no longer depend on animal blood for forgiveness but the latter(moral) was expatiated upon by Christ showing us the deeper dimensions and higher requirements (eg the sermon on the mount, His Own Life) such that we immediately see our need of God's working in our hearts. In fact Moses reported God's desire to Israel in Deuteronomy 5:29 where GOD said Oh that there were such an heart in them, that they would fear me and keep all my commandments always that it may be well with them. This clearly shows that beyond the external , strained compliance to written codes, God's perspective was also on the heart. David also realised this when he prayed in Psalm 51:10,11 create in me a Clean heart O God and renew a right spirit within me... Take not Thy Holy Spirit from me.. In case this does not answer your question pls feel free to notify. |
Fari9482:Yes, Jeremiah 31:31 reveals that God said He will make this New covenant with the house of Israel and Judah. Now if we stopped there, I myself wont be a Christian. But if you consider other bible references like Isaiah 56:6-8, also the sons of the stranger that join themselves to the Lord. . . And takes hold of MY covenant; even them will I bring to my Holy Mountain (Heaven). . . For my House shall be called the House of prayer for all people. And other like references. That's why Joel 2:28,29 God promises to pour HIS Spirit on All flesh. Finally Revelations 7 summarises this: it reveals the tribes of Israel and (vs 9)a great multitude of all nations washed in the blood of the Lamb (vs 14-17) standing before The Throne of GOD. |
shahydbinaliyu:Jeremiah only prophesied about it years before it took place. Note Jer 31:34b I will forgive their iniquity and I will remember their sin no more. This remission of sin was alluded to by Jesus Christ when He said in Matthew 26:28, this is My Blood of the New Testament which is shed for many for the Remission of sins. |
To all esteemed NLers, I advise that any view or principle not backed up by verbatim quotes from both the Old and new testaments against the backdrop of the obvious intention of the Inspired writer, be ignored. Many are twisting scriptures and quoting txts out of context, holding to single passages why ignoring parallel ref that clarify the former,etc (just like satan did when he quoted part of psalm 91 to Jesus)at their peril. It's unfortunate when we seek to canonise our failings with Scripture. |
FrancisTony:Yes my country, not the Church left those other ones. Before GOD, a liar , fornicator and homosexual are all guilty. |
boring.