₦airaland Forum

just watchng 4 now

went 4 vac in sandton joburg last year. pix brought back memories. sandton is a cute lil place with quite a number of malls suprisingly similar to 'The palms'in Lekki. but way way much bigger and active

funny enuff, Pele saw he potential in them, not his fault nigerinas are f, ing underachievers

@kadman
y is ur kiddies pix labelled porn?

has it occured to any1 tht he bought the plane because he needed one?
u cant buy a plane for N20 can u?

@kobo
if all is fair in politics, then Obama using the colour of his skin to protect himself is fair too.

to the questions u posted above, ideally the media shouldnt be openly biased. im not claiming the media is biased against Obama, far from it but assoiciating someone with a terrorist just because he has an arab name smacks a lil bit of cheap oppotunism.
whats the worst u can say about Clinton or Mcain?? tht theyre too American??
Whats the worst u can say abt Obama?
tht he s a bloody terrorist loving nigga?
well they already have

@kobo
oh come on, no wonder u ve been labelled anti-obama! u sound just like a hilary lover1 obma's skin got him this far now being black is no longer a disadvantage but an advantage!!!!!!!

@oyinye
dont be funny. it depends on the way the guy is. guys buy drinks for random guys all the time. theres nothng wrong with a guy going 'drinks onme'. in fact in 9ja u cant go to a club without meeting sm1 who ll buy u a drink whether he knows u or not.

@redhotchillipepper
una dey go club 10

could have been better

First, no, Newton's gravitational law wasn't modified by Einstein, it was superseded by Einstein's theory of relativity; and while Newton's law isn't exactly considered right, it's still a useful tool for explaining and showing the workings of several things - especially to non-physicists and students.

Second, what laws of Darwin have been modified? As far as I know, the closest Darwin came to establishing a law would have been indicating that mutations tend to happen with reproduction. No, I haven't seen any reason to think the theory of evolution is wrong. It isn't a law, though.

Relativity is a modification of Newton s laws of gravity. Newtons laws only fall apart in more complex situations. Darwin i shall not talk about.


Oh no, the two worlds influence each other, there their relatedness lies; but to be clear, the


Oh, I know you weren't implying he gets ignored because he is Nigerian, I just thought I'd mention that.

Ok.


Read it again. I don't see where I even imply that the "thermo laws are impractical for the macro world". Also, it is known how the thermodynamics laws work.

Ok. maybe im the one reading more than you said


I believe this is a major point of contention: do the quantum and classical world follow the same rules? I don't think so, but I'm open to the idea that they might.

they have to Kag!! because they are one ant the same thing. a house is made of bricks. the brick is the micro , the house is the macro. all observation suggests they don't follow the same rules which is a contradiction and this is y scientist are spending countless hours trying to find the T.O.E that explains it all.



Um, it doesn't work that way. For one thing, all things don't point to zero not existing. For another, that you intuitively feel zero can't exist doesn't logically lead to a conclusion that zero can't exist.

Dear Kag, i thought i was done explaining to you how zero only exists in the mind as a concept.



Come again. Why would you need to find another perfectly symmetrical photon to have one perfect photon. That makes no sense.
because to be perfectly symmetrical you have to not only be of the same size but occupy the same space, which frankly is impossible.


Again you've missed my points. Ignoring those for a second, though, a singularity isn't just a concept, it's something that exists. So, if it is nothing, then, following your logic, it directly implies that nothing does in fact exist.


well its a bit of a contradiction really. a singularity is something but it is nothing at the same time,  just like when we Xtians say God is the Alpha and the Omega


Coming back to the final points, "Two things. like I said above, if that's your present argument then it would seem you now don't object to the notion of a singularity being something - a something antecedent to the Universe.

a singularity is a 'something'that has become a 'nothing

Second, I've stated that it's wrong because I don't see how you can consider something that exists, the closest to nothing we have, considering we do indeed have notions of nothing especially with vacuums of different states and observations being the most prevalent examples used to represent a state of nothing

a singularity is a phenomenon. its not necessarily a 'physical thing' its a something that has become a nothing,  or its a nothing that has the potential of becoming something if there is a slight shift in balance

@poster
no. 1 many of these banks are planning on extending their actitvities out of nigerian shores
no.2 poverty eradication is not a bank's job. it is the government's.

@gamine
its not your fault. dont worry
how can you know what a good university is like when u never went to one?

women are just confused, they never know what they want! masculine masculine metrosexual , give it all to them they ll still be confused!

Dudes love ALL sorts of women, tall, short, light skinned dark skinned, big boobs, smaller boobs, big hips, not so big hipped, airheads, tomboys, smart, not so smart, we love them ALL.

but women they never know,

?

bush is such a dummy! he actually makes politics interesting cos it isnt everyday u see such a stupid powerful person

sex

@ holy thug

sex

sex

really good.

answered most of them, love the long time no see. couldnt do tht,

sex

sex

i am tolding Jeovi not to ran away, are u hard on hearing?

clemcykul:
it was so

now with a reply like that, do u think u have common sense?

SHARAAP!

so sharrap yar mouth

Jeovi plix dont ran away, u should patient with illetracy people who dont spoke good english

sex

moondust:
Condoms don't give 100% protection. How many times do u want to hear it?

condoms are not 100% safe. agreed. but theyre 90% safe. being faithful to a partner isnt safe either cos ur partner just might not be faithful. and AIDS isnt transmitted only through sex. for a sexually active person (most of us are according to statistics) condoms are the best option.

the only reason y AIDS is so bad in Africa is because Africans dont use condoms, think, are we more sexually active than Americans and Europeans?, i think not.

What do you mean by the Laws need to be modified, as opposed to them breaking down at the micro-level? Further, doesn't the notion of modifying a law invalidate the purpose of the law? That is, it ceases to be a law at that point'
thats wrong dude1 quick example, Newtons law was modified by Einstein, but we dont exactly consider Newtons gravity laws wrond do we? Also Darwin s laws have been mofified more times than i can count and even though i m convinced Darwin is crap im sure you dont consider his theory wrong. or do you?


I[b] agree that scientists have been searching for a unifying theory for decades. Such a theory would need to be able to explain and unify quantum physics with classical physics, that is, the micro and macro worlds. In other words, there exists a division in how both states operate. And, you'd be wrong to say the two cannot be separated - if they couldn't, quantum physics wouldn't be so damn annoying and cool.[/b]

im assuming the fact that scientist assume that a unifying theory has to exist SHOWS that the two worlds are considered a continuation of the same thing.dog, the term UNIFYING theory says it all.


Also, there's a reason the Nigerian guy has been ignored, and it's not because he's Nigerian.

cant remember alluding to that. i just mentioned that as an aside. i have no idea of the veracity or otherwise of his claims.

Yeah, I didn't say any of that

DIRECT QUOTE FROM KAG

So, for the first, the laws of thermodynamics may be found impractical for the micro-world, and for the latter, the emergence of virtual particles would be counterintuitive.
[i][/i]

yes u did kag


Well, it is. Someday some genius or group of geniuses may find a way to fully unite both.

It isnt really. the two worlds just seem to follow two different laws. we all know they follow the same rules, we just dont know the rule yet.
yes. some genius will do that


First, I'm inclined to state that there is a possibility of zero existing. You mentioned something about limited knowledge earlier. It would seem that's applicable here, as we should not conclude dogmatically that something mathematical can't exist based on nothing more than our intuition.

Kag, all things at present point to zero not exisiting. so for now, zero cant exist!

Second, again a false syllogism seems to have crept in: the argument for the unlikelihood of a zero in reality is no indication on the likelihood of a one, as they are slightly different conceptions in reality. What may be considered a perfect one? Would one photon suffice?

No! except you find another photon that is perfectly symmetrical to the first photon


Finally, again, I'm disinclined to believe that a perfect vacuum can't exist. It certainly can. In any case, if we agree that a singuarity is something then we are back to the beginning of the line that started the discussion (and perhaps the end), where I indicated that a singularity is something.

A singularity is a something, in the sense that zero as a concept is a something. a singularity is zero, which is nothing.

dont be sill yáll, it was obviously fotoshoped.