₦airaland Forum

I'm sorely tempted to say make sure you do a good job.

But i think its best you file a complaint with the police.

greenmonk:
The man sef no get shame. Another man, ordinary army robber dey shag him wife for him presence and him no fit do nothing na to kom dey form macho for where him wife de na him de do.

So what should he have done sir?

Fight them, get killed, wife gets raped.

What is your intelligent solution to the problem?

ogorwyne:
This doesn't make sense na. The husband should be a very jealous man, she was raped for heaven's sake. Its not like she was caught shagging another man. I have tried to understand his pain, but he should get over it and stop disgracing himself and the woman he married. Abeg he should get a grip of himself, his mami probably likes sex and got carried away, but that doesn't stop it from being a rape case.

Very few people would know that a woman can orgasm during rape. However those case are actually very rare and the enjoyment only lasts during orgasm from what i read up on it.

In this case the woman may have been enjoying the entire session since she was moaning (present continuous), whereas it should have been painful since lubrication only comes with stimulation. i mean, isn't this why women say you have to do pre-intimacy first, and they can't have sex when they are tired, or not in the mood?

pocohantas:
I have to agree with you on this.

I noticed the so called broke guys do lots of emotional blackmail. Once you reject them, they feel it's because of their financial state.

I know broke guys that are dating very good-looking girls just by their sense of humour...lots of our Nigerian comedians are perfect examples. Back then in school, there were guys that had girls flocking around them because they were intelligent.

All this money talk is just consolation for guys who have no wow factor. I am not surprised though, the average Nigerian man only knows how to use money to get a woman, later they will wonder why the woman cheated with a broke guy. They will end up saying women are confused, instead of facing the reality...it goes beyond money for lots of women.

Yes, financial security is important, but what if it's no more there tomorrow. You mean there is nothing else you can offer your woman or be remembered for?



I will suggest you stop convulsing because of my comment. You please women, you don't please them...your business. I only commented on the topic, you should do same.

When your fellow men create topics everyday on women matter, you didn't help us tell them life is beyond their erect pricks.

You make a good point but as much as i'm tempted to agree with you to an extent, the fact is that rich guys get more girls than broke guys. There is a definite pattern here. For this to be true (which it is), then it means there is something that rich guys have in common that makes them more attractive, and there is something that broke guys have in common that makes them less attractive. The obvious: money--or the lack thereof.

Girls would be the first to own up to this. No girl would say i want to be with a broke guy.

Now you could argue that broke guys don't get girls because they lack some other qualities and i would say that since wealth does not come in the DNA, there cannot be any characteristics that automatically separate the personality of rich guys from that of broke guys. I'm saying broke guys and rich guys are likely to have the same spread of personality traits. Some will be funny, some would be boring, some will be confident, some will be timid, some will be intelligent, some will be idiots.

I put it to you that there are three primal factors that drive all women:

1. Luxury
2. Sex/lust
3. Notoriety

Women are attracted to men who possess one or all of these traits. But when you look at the true average Joe on the streets, he really does not possess any "sex/lust" or notoriety by nature. How many guys do you see out of the thousands who cross your path on a daily basis, who you feel powerfully attracted to? At most 2 on a good day, and 1 a week every other day.

How many guys have that aura of notoriety or power that women love? statistically, leaders and lone-wolf bad boys are outliers.

This means that the average guy really is not notable in his natural state. So let us exclude those outliers--the anomalies--who are broke but have an aura of notoriety or power, or are exceptionally good looking. Let us look solely at the average broke man, and the average rich man who both lack exceptional sex appeal or notoriety/power factor.

Within this scope, we have already established that is might be a statistical fallacy to say that all broke guys have a different personality from rich guys since personality is innate and wealth is not. Take for example most comedians who started out dirt poor (as a matter of fact i hold the opinion that these comedians are funnier when they are still poor). So we take a broke funny guy and a rich funny guy and offer him to 10 girls. 10 out of 10 will choose the rich one, and that is why we say girls like rich guys.

Even where you differentiate between the average broke guy and the average rich guy, by other factors such as intelligence or kindness etc, most girls of nowadays at best would say okay i will be with you for now because i think you might be able to give me the luxury i want at some point but if you don't show any signs of making it within such and and such period of time and i get a better offer, i'm off.

At the end of the day it boils down to money. Even when women say they want a man with vision, it is not as though having a vision itself is attractive to them, rather it is the understanding that having a vision means the guy might make it in life that appeals to them. Thus the driving factor is still money.

brennyB:
Recently I noticed my younger sister is dating my boyfriend's younger brother, now she is staying with me, so is my boyfriend's brother with him too, and we live close. And they are both 17, I have tried talking to the both of them, especially the boy,who opens up everything to me, he had broken the relationship severally since he notice his elder brother had a thing with me, but my own sister will not let him be.
To the point that my sister is praying that my relationship of how long shouldn't lead to marriage because she would want her relationship with my boyfriend's younger brother to lead to marriage.
And now it kinda bothers me, and I don't know what to do.
please I need candid advice

There is nothing wrong with dating from the same family. Secondly stop looking out for yourself and not giving a hoot about your little sister's happiness.

That being said, her 17 year old love will fizzle out soon, so allow nature run its course. That is if your own does not fizzle out first.

wintersnow:
Would you love to be treated that way? Its kinda weird sha

There are women who like that...so long as it is accompanied by pampering.

Evablizin:
Well is non of the pastor's business his work is to wed them simple,did the guy use hook to drag the lady to the alter,she has made her choice period

of course it is his business. Church is not a place where you go to to do things as you like. The pastor is meant to take a personal interest in your life. If you don't want people asking you questions then please find your way to the nearest registry.

MrDandy:
The street of romance section in the city of Nairaland is full of yabalefties..

Na only God fit save us

Modified: I had to post the screenshot of what the op posted on my Snapchat mehn, kolo people jus full naija

Do you still have it? Seems she has modified the post..abeg post it here

So if you kiss a woman, just because fahggots kiss each other does it mean you are just like them?

Logic.



btw that woman is not pretty.

I don't care...gimme back my toyo baby or carry ya show and go.

ephi321:
I can't be wasting my time answering questions that any right thinking person should already have answers to.

As I said earlier, continue with the defense. It eventually always comes round to bite people in the butt. So yes, continue.

But you have wasted your time quoting me to say you can't waste your time? Sure.

Biko, next time don't waste your time, quoting me.

ephi321:
Did you seriously ask these questions?

Then the situation in this country is even more critical if we can't even see clearly what the key issues are. And even worse are defending this.

Captives defending their captors. Continue.

You are the one who can't see what the key issue is in this case. All i want is for you to explain is:

1. How the presence of the Attorney General's son in a Nigerian school makes it better, given that i. the attorney general has no influence over education ii. the majority of politicians kids schooled in the country from kindergarten through secondary school. How did it improve the education system?

2. Entrance into schools is based on merit. Should politicians kids be granted automatic entry at the exclusion of better qualified candidates, in order to achieve whatever benefits you believe will accrue?

3. Is the politicians son or daughter not an adult with a right to choose where and what they want to study?

Answer All.

Goodluck making sense.

sarrki:
How will our education system work

When everyone from the presidency to local government sends their kids abroad

I tire for all our leaders across party

1. How does the Attorney General's son's presence in any Nigerian school make that school or the schooling system any better? Does the attorney general's position have a bearing on the education system?

2. If the Attorney General's son cannot meet the entry requirements should he be granted automatic admission anyway, in order to achieve the benefits, with regards to 1. above, which you may believe may exist?

If the igbo could only take their eyes of money for a second! By all accounts, the igbo population in the north is huge... instead of cowering in fear, the igbos should blend in and gradually establish themselves as part and parcel of the north instead of visitors. This is what pakistanis have done in the UK and today so many influential British politicians are of pakistani origin.

Igbos should look more into politics. It is one thing to make wealth but something else to control it. Without the latter you are merely toiling for someone else.

In a country like Nigeria, every household should possess a firearm. It is actually legal if licensed so i have no idea why people don't have them.

Rather remarkable that it is Christian northern youth that are spearheading the divisive calls or being used to do so. If/when nigeria splits, i wonder what they imagine would be their political status in a sharia state.

Ajewealth123:
Now let me go back and read


That app to check if someone dey mad should be installed on the phones of these danfo drivers and some female drivers tooo

Its almost as if the moment someone says "I am going to be a taxi/danfo driver" their brains become different from others

Icon79:
Are you sure that these are the real kidnappers or just a bunch of hoodlums picked up from the street ... while the real culprits bribe their way out? I mean, if these are the real kidnappers, why do they look so unkempt and hungry? Where's the all the millions of the ransom money they collect from people?

Something is definitely wrong with these pictures.

O pari

In the world of crime it is just the same as in the real world. Foot soldiers are not paid well.

jaytime:
Hmmm, police, our friends dey shine these days like kilode!

Probably cause Mr. Evans is spilling the beans on all his contacts and accomplices. Don't be surprised in Evans gets a 10 year sentence at the end of the day.

In other words they could have arrested the guy but Mr topshot just had to be there to take the glory.

Just lost some respect for the man.

In other words they could have arrested the guy but Mr topshot just had to be there to take the glory.

He was charged with abduction and attempted murder after she died in childbirth?

I now understand why they say young lawyers in Nigeria are unemployed. It is because they don't know their work.

A smart lawyer could have solved this guys problem at half the cost.

Simply threaten the police to sue them for malicious prosecution for those rubbish charges, settle the DPO with 50 k, settle the elders of the community with drinks worth 50 k, and settle the family with a token of no more than 200k after making it clear to them that their daughter was a promiscuous adult. Then you the lawyer can pocket 100-150 k.

Won't everybody be happy?

people that believe this story....


amazing

Wonderful news.

Dah nigga go hear am for body.

Afonjashapmouth:
Why do some people resort to "my girlfriend left me" when I was nothing, let's be realistic what father would let their daughter be pinned down to an uneducated street footballer at her early stage of life Would you ever let your own daughter She made a decision which every lady is entitled to. If reverse was the case men depending in women, how many of us would stay and be faithful in hardship and not seek sugar mummies?? Let's do table turns sometimes guys and leave this after breakthrough sentiments. After all the girl might not be made for you. Let guys talk about my wife left me and not girlfriend abeg, if leprosy has strucked the girl back then would he have married her..Happy for you though

The rationality behind his girlfriend leaving him is not at all the point. The point is that he was in a bad situation where no one believed in him, yet he pulled through and today he proved his dream right. Period.

Also, human beings are not investment portfolios or stocks that you only invest in when you see value in them. They are more like seeds whose value depends on how you cultivate them. There is value in everyone.

adults that refuse to grow up

adepeter26:
Maybe you could tell. Me how I abused logic. Anyways, still following

LOLLLL. Still following sha

All this your redefinition won't still change the obvious fallacy from what I quoted.
Anyways, I will save you the stress of back and forth lecturing by visiting the link below.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman

That the problem with many of you Christians, when 1+1!=2, you try to formulate/shift the reason why 1+1!=2 and that's no true Scotsman fallacy. Trying to shift accepted conditions cos it no longer fits into your argument.

Trash. Lol, now it's interpretation that matters? Ok, here is a question I have for you.
Did the archaic English agree with the modern English that Jesus died and rose again? Pls do answer this question

Man, i tire for for twisting of terms oo. Hope you're OK.?
Its not a must to win arguments for YAHWEH even when you know you can never win

Lol, another ad-hoc again.... I don laugh tire

Mr, the link is above, read more Jor and stop forming I TOO KNOW.

Anyways, I'm happy you accepted your statement was fallacious..

Reminder to my above question;
Did the archaic English agree with the modern English that Jesus died and rose again? Pls do answer this question

You seriously do not have sense. If you could not understand the simple things I have tried to explain there.

Yes of course the archaic English agrees with the modern English that Jesus died and rose again. Has nothing to do with a no true Scotsman fallacy. I pity you half-baked Nigerian atheists.

Your western counterparts at least are well educated but you are just here making a fool of yourself and throwing in what you think are clever-sounding phrases you do not understand in between.

Clown.

adepeter26:
No true Scotsman fallacy


But archaic English and modern English were right when they said, "JESUS DIED AND ROSE AGAIN ABI?"

You must be a joker

Facepalm. What abuse of logic!!

The Bible was not written in English. It was written in Hebrew and translated into so many different versions of English.This is a fact. For you to reference the no true Scotsman fallacy means you simply do not understand what the no true Scotsman fallacy is about. It illustrates the subjective classification of a person or thing as lacking some quality simply because it does not behave in the way a person would like to prove that it does.

It is not subjective that the bible passage quoted earlier is indeed translated in archaic English. That is objective reality. It has nothing to do with what is said but rather with how you have interpreted it.

Archaic English is not different language from English altogether, and therefore it will mot always differ from current English. That is the objective fact.

So if it means something different from modern English in some places, it should not be expected to necessarily do so in all places.

That my friend, is the fallacy of composition.

dalaman:
Most of your write up is just so nonsensical that I don't know where to begin from. Everything written up there is just empty assertion that makes no sense at all. I will just take one of them and show you that your assertions are false.




This is completely false. How can the pinnacle of moral perfection engage on evil? The bible is some.places has God doing evil, and apologizing for his evil deeds.

(Exod. 32:14), “And the Lord repented of the evil [/b]which he thought to do unto his people.

If ye will still abide in this land, then will I build you, and not pull you down, and I will plant you, and not pluck you up: [b]For I repent me of the evil that I have done unto you.
Jeremiah 42:10

Why is your God doing evil and repenting? A perfect God that is the pinnacle of morality that goes about doing evil is impossible.

As usual you have come to just expose your self and you weak and ill thought out arguments that make no sense at all.

You are quoting archaic English and interpreting it in modern English.

If you want the truth then be truthful in your quest.

Dlordsamurai:
Everything that the mother have should be left alone..
she did not kidnap anybody, its not a crime for a mother to take money from her son..
Evans should face the music alone...
Even if she knew about her son, is not a guarantee that she must be held responsible for her son's sins..
Evans is mature so every decision he makes is his own doing.

You are joking. She knew of his criminal acts and not report him, that is aiding and abetting. She shared in the proceeds, that is being an active accomplice.

She has a case to answer.

Nobleking1994:
Prescribing pain killers on the part of the hospital is not a major interference in the chain of causation because the hospital might have serious and important emergency to attain to which they might be attaining to without the knowledge of the seriousness of the injury suffered by the woman.
In criminal law there are two elements that must be responsible for one to be found guilty which is "actus reus" (guilty act) and "mens rea(guilty mind).
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Actus_reus. Go and read up.

The judge in determining the case will put into consideration that will the lady have died of that illness within that period of time if there was no physical abuse on her. The negligible act of the hospital or doctor is immaterial since the physical abuse provided the setting for the woman to suffer from other illments.

Don't piss me off. You are quoting wikipedia to explain a concept you don't understand. I am a law student, and a very good one at that.

The act of negligence on the part of the hospital is one of the forms of guilt mind (men's rea) which include intent, re klessness and negligence.

The hospital was meant to carry out a thorough examination and there is no excuse for not doing so. If they were busy they should have referred her elsewhere.

Please stay out of things you know nothing about.

feelgoodInc:
I was talking about the HEAD QUARTERS.
it had always been in the south south but was moved to Lagos, I mean all head quarters.

2) the army has much to loose if Nigeria separates and will want to do more to keep the country one, the essence of that state of emergency is just to give them a little bit of action, and Kano state will take notice.

What I am trying to tell you is that any such move to move hq's will be seen as an attempt to consolidate assets and control oil revenue by the south which we all know is the main reason the north is not ready to leave the Union. Following such, you will see that many more northern groups would then unify behind the arewa youth in the anti-south east rhetoric. Tensions are already inflamed so what you need to do is deescalate any potential sources of provocation instead of adding more fuel to the fire.

Secondly, what does the army have to lose if Nigeria disintegrates?

feelgoodInc:
was osibanjo ordered not to arrest them or just advised not to arrest them, If I was him I have a plan,
1) the army needs some action so declare a 3 months state of emergency in kaduna on 30th September a day to 1st October. as a surprise.

2) arrest Nnamdi kanu and deport him, as a British citizen as he is.

3) transfer all head quarters of oil companies to the South south.

4) award a contract to dredge either the Port Harcourt, Warri or Calabar seaport.

5) name northern and southern leaders and any NGO that are in support of Quit notice and Biafra in media
to checkmate them.

i) seize their passports because if things go out of hand they'll want to escape so I will revoke their passports letting them know that we are in this together.

then things will be normalized.

1. Northern dominated army cannot be expected to be loyal.
2. Any attempt to arrest mazi Kanu will surely end in bloodshed
3. The order to move oil companies hqs down south will be seen as an act of aggression by the north. The northern dominated army may then become a threat to the acting president.

The moves you've listed are the fastest way to ensure violence