₦airaland Forum

Welcome, Guest: RegisterLoginWith GoogleTrendingRecentNew

Stats: 3,324,993 members, 8,419,843 topics. Date: Thursday, 04 June 2026 at 01:55 AM

Toggle theme

SNCOQ3's Posts

Nairaland ForumSNCOQ3's ProfileSNCOQ3's Posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (of 17 pages)

Christianity EtcRe: Jenna Presley (Pornographic-Star) Finds Jesus by SNCOQ3(m): 11:57am On Aug 04, 2013
Salmoneus: This may only make her movies go in higher circulation. grin
na ya sef u dey do

Scientist finds por.nography causes brain damage:

http://www.sexaddictionhelp.com.au/2013/05/08/sex-addiction-conference/

http://www.ucg.org/christian-living/porn-causes-brain-damage/

---change "Indecency" to por.n (without the dot ) in the above link ---
Christianity EtcRe: Jenna Presley (Pornographic-Star) Finds Jesus by SNCOQ3(m): 11:38am On Aug 04, 2013
Thank you Jesus.
Christianity EtcRe: A White Brother Tells The Truth About Black Christians by SNCOQ3(m): 10:31am On Aug 03, 2013
Logicboy03: Thanks Kails!

FamilyRe: Quality Nigerian Husbands Will Be Scarce By 2023 - Women Group by SNCOQ3(m): 6:50pm On Aug 02, 2013
You can tell from most of the male comments here that real men are already scarce; but for a different reason:

https://www.nairaland.com/925494/de-feminization-men
Christianity EtcRe: Gays Can't Accept Jesus. They Can't Be Born Again. Oiseworld And Åll Interested by SNCOQ3(m): 9:37am On Aug 02, 2013
Jesus died and resurrected for thieves, the greedy, fornicators, liars, gays, psycopaths, adulterers...etc. Their are 'gays' who are children of God: They do not call God a liar by justifying or rationalizing their 'gayness' ; they live their lives depending on the grace of God to overcome their gay tendencies. Some are now married with children and are doing well for God and society.

Though I do not agree with the RCC as an institution, I find it incredible the way the Pope's comment is been misundertood.

Going by prophesy, the gay movement will eventually have its way worldwide; but we have a sacred responsibility to tell the truth and expose falsehood without fear- till the end.

You can read the interview of an ex-gay here: narth.com/docs/opp.html
PoliticsRe: Nigerian Troops Begin Withdrawal From Mali Today by SNCOQ3(m): 5:01pm On Jul 31, 2013
^ Accepted.
PoliticsRe: Nigerian Troops Begin Withdrawal From Mali Today by SNCOQ3(m): 3:59pm On Jul 31, 2013
careytommy: That's why i love GEJ, doesn't tolerate rubbish!

I'm guessing your username is your block address.
Dumb move!
21 years ago.
PoliticsRe: Nigerian Troops Begin Withdrawal From Mali Today by SNCOQ3(m): 3:54pm On Jul 31, 2013
-double post-
PoliticsRe: Nigerian Troops Begin Withdrawal From Mali Today by SNCOQ3(m): 3:10pm On Jul 31, 2013
-double post-
PoliticsRe: Nigerian Troops Begin Withdrawal From Mali Today by SNCOQ3(m): 3:09pm On Jul 31, 2013
@naptu2,
Thanks very much.
PoliticsRe: Nigerian Troops Begin Withdrawal From Mali Today by SNCOQ3(m): 3:06pm On Jul 31, 2013
LT SHANGY: THE PREMIUM TIMES are truely not competative in the media world. THE MILITARY ARE LEAVING MALI NOT BECAUSE OF THE BOKO HARAM INSURGENCY BUT THE FACT IS THAT THE MALIAN OPERATION IS NO LONGER AN AFISMA OPERATION, IT IS NOW A UN OPERATION(MINUSMA). IN PROTEST TO THE RWANDAN GENERAL APPOINTMENT, THE NIGERIAN MILITARY WILL ONLY DEPLOY A LEVEL 2 MILITARY HOSPITAL, A FULL SIGNAL SQUADRON AND THE POLICE UNIT.
We should withdraw all our troops at once. Lets leave Mali for France to be playing international politics by relegating Nigeria to the background. Their current president is competing with the US on "strategic intervention" yet they're begging thesame US through the backdoor for drones to use in the operation.
PoliticsRe: Nigerian Troops Begin Withdrawal From Mali Today by SNCOQ3(m): 2:38pm On Jul 31, 2013
naptu2: I support this move. I don't think we should ever allow a general from another african country to command our troops, so that we won't have a repeat of the "General Quainoo debacle".
Pls enlighten us.
PoliticsRe: Marriageable Age Of Places Around The World by SNCOQ3(m): 9:50am On Jul 22, 2013
ShyM-X:
Bro, it's still back to the same consciousness and evolution. The women were ready for it and they joined the activists in the protest against it, hence why the change happened.
Now you are talking. We southerners can kick-start the activism and the nothern women at the receiving end will be emboldened to join us.

I understand what you are driving at. In theory, culture is progressive; but what you are not taking into account is: in reality, their are factors in cultures that accelerate, slow, stagnate, ret.ard and even self-destruct a people's progress.

If not for the moral side, I would'nt have made it my business like my brother davidylan stated. But we are stuck in this forced marriage called Nigeria with the retrogressive elements always having the upper hand.
PoliticsRe: Marriageable Age Of Places Around The World by SNCOQ3(m): 9:14am On Jul 22, 2013
biolabee: Tragic.. Isn't it

Forerunners of thought now bogged in archaic child bride mess
exactly.
PoliticsRe: Marriageable Age Of Places Around The World by SNCOQ3(m): 9:05am On Jul 22, 2013
It took many many years of immense pressure from activist to permit Saudi Arabian women drive a car.

If left to ShyM-X's 'cultural evolution' theory, it would never have happened.
PoliticsRe: Marriageable Age Of Places Around The World by SNCOQ3(m): 8:23am On Jul 22, 2013
biolabee: Just want to add chemistry is derived from an arabic word
So is algebra. Its not about the race but about the belief system that shapes the culture. Islam is retrogressive.
PoliticsRe: Marriageable Age Of Places Around The World by SNCOQ3(m): 9:49pm On Jul 21, 2013
ShyM-X:
How come everyone on this darn forum always cite "the killing of twins?" Is that the only thing y'all know? It's stale now - find something else to talk about. And I don't need to remind you that Yoruba's and a lot of other African cultures NEVER killed twins - I don't know which culture(s) did - but that's their prerogative. undecided
You asked for examples and I gave you one; It could have been slavery too.
Well, up until the renaissance - Europeans used to sell their women into slavery. There were crusaders all over Europe killing people. Cannibalism was rife in Europe. And most Europeans were primitive and vandals. However, did they evolve or not? Heck, even less than 100 years ago, child labour was rife in the UK. Did the people evolve or not?
My argument with you is about the means of change: 'evolve' vs activism. I go for activism. Thank God the likes of William Wilberforce, MLK etc did not wait for 'evolution' to do their thing :-)
I don't believe Islamic states are stuck. I just believe we haven't given them the opportunity to evolve due to trying to force our way-of-life on them. They have been on defensive for most part of the century - hence why they're stuck. The same analogy applies to African people.
That is a simplistic excuse for Islam. They are aggressive with their agenda for world domination. Don't forget that they are the ones trying to force their belief on us- remember boko haram and the likes? Islam is simply incopartible with 'evolve'.
PoliticsRe: Marriageable Age Of Places Around The World by SNCOQ3(m): 8:40pm On Jul 21, 2013
-double post-
PoliticsRe: Marriageable Age Of Places Around The World by SNCOQ3(m): 8:39pm On Jul 21, 2013
ShyM-X:
Can you define what a retrogressive culture and cite examples of cultures that are retrogressive?
Killing of twins.

If you study human psychology, you will understand how evolution works. Progression happens gradually with consciousness - you can't make it an instantaneous thing.
'Evolution' is too slow- We can't wait for 'evolution' for moral reasons.
I am certain you're aquainted with the word 'Agent of Change'; Mary Slessor was one. Its more effective than 'evolve'.

I bet if you'd been alive during the middle-ages (probably as a Moor or Arab) - you probably would have written off the Europeans as well due to how savagely their culture was. Up until the 18th century, adults were marrying 7 year old kids in Europe. The people evolved and moved away from it.
I am not disputing the fact that Europe once had a reprehensible culture...but they changed while the islamic states are mostly stuck. The change was not a function of 'evolution' but belief sir.
PoliticsRe: Marriageable Age Of Places Around The World by SNCOQ3(m): 8:06pm On Jul 21, 2013
ShyM-X:
[color=#8fa694]Now, I'm pissed off!

So basically because [/color]I believe in cultural conservatism and making people evolve with their culture still intact to allow progressive change in their consciousness [color=#8fa694] - I'm now a pervert/pedo, no? grin

Psychotic plonkers! undecided [/color]
cultural conservatism even at the risk of conserving a retrogressive culture?

And when is Islam compartible with 'evolve' ?
PoliticsRe: Pictures Of Military Hard-wares At The Army Day Celebration 2013 by SNCOQ3(m): 1:04pm On Jul 12, 2013
25Calibre: I'm saying special forces shouldn't be using AK-47s, I don't care if its only the Nigeria army using it.

AK-47 is now ubiquitous, almost anyone can lay hands on that rifle, most rebel groups use AK-47s. How can you call yourself special forces when there is nothing special about your force? Special forces and rebels using the same gun, where is the sense in that.
A lady I know in Lagos once said the reason why she won't use BB is because "every id.iot is using it"(her word), therefore using it won't make her look special.
Your average pros.titute can afford a Z10 but don't know how to maximize its sophisticated functions aside calling, receiving and pinging nonsense; Yet, a smart businessman can, with an "obsolete" Nokia 3110, initiate and close a deal worth millions of dollars.

What makes them special is not the choice of weapon but how effective they can use it to accomplish their well defined mission.
There are many very powerful, accurate, high velocity, light weight, reliable rifles out there, there is no excuse for using Ak-47.
As an ex-barrack boy, I can authoritatively tell you that the NA knows more about this 'special rifles' than you can ever know. My dad(ex-242RECCE/Garisson Command Officer) use to bring foreign millitary magazines on 'special rifle' home - thats before their was such a thing as the internet. The NA can afford them but they have their reasons.
Christianity EtcRe: Greatest Religion Section Quotes ( sticky) by SNCOQ3(m): 1:58pm On Jul 04, 2013
Science is not an enemy to Abrahamic
faiths... that is the myth atheists constantly
try to force in order to continue the
narrative of faith being an illogical thought process.
- davidylan
Christianity EtcRe: The Question Of Forgiveness by SNCOQ3(m): 9:00pm On Jul 02, 2013
Reyginus: You really understand what the problem is, like few people here.
This solves the problem for me. I knew the problem lies in my understanding of forgiveness in the face of God and man. Thank you very much, guys. The above answers it for me.[code][/code]
The Lord bless you too: May His Holy Spirit continue to guide us.
Christianity EtcRe: The Question Of Forgiveness by SNCOQ3(m):
Reyginus: It's like I have to make the question clear.
My question is this, why is it a sin when we refuse to forgive an offender who is yet to ask for forgiveness, but not a sin when God forgives not a sinner until he asks for forgiveness?
1a. God is the absolute moral being. He is Holy. He is Just. He is Love.
1b. The wages of sin is death.

In the light of Holiness and Justice:

2a. God wronged no one; therefore owes no one.
2b. Man wronged God; therefore owes God.
2c. Man owes God a bigger debt that he can ever owe another man he has wronged
2d. When a man wrongs another man; he wrongs God too; therefore owes God and the victim.
2e. The victim is a man - he owes God - he is guilty too; therefore he does not have a moral high ground before God.

3a. Jesus is the only real victim; He wrong no one but was murdered.
3b. While man is yet a sinner, Jesus paid the ultimate price to cancel his debt.
3c. Jesus is God; God was in Christ reconciling man unto himself;
3d. God was the victim; the victim paid the ransome to God- to set man free. God is Love
3e. God is the saviour of man;

4a. Man is not deserving,did not and cannot earn salvation.
4b. Salvation is a gift(3b,3c,3d,3e).
4c. If man rejects the gift, he already stand condemned(1b,2a,2b).
4d. If man accept the gift, then man has a moral obligation to God to forgive his unrepentant offender(1b,2a,2b,2c,2d,2e,3a,3b,3c,3d,3e,4a,4b).

5a. God is not bound by any or thesame moral obligation to forgive an unrepentant offender(2a,2b); yet(3b,3c).


Bottom line:
-------------------
1. Your proposition is based on a false idea of moral equivalence; God and man are not on the same moral pedestal(2a,2b,2c).

2. Anyone who cannot forgive an unrepentant offender does not understand the dept of what Christ did for him(3a -> 4b)

3. You can only hold God accountable based on His promises. Not what you think you're entitled to.
Christianity EtcRe: Angry Atheist by SNCOQ3(m): 6:11pm On Jun 17, 2013
Uyi Iredia: It's human to be angry and I empathize with the blogger. Religionists_and some are_ as well should be angry about some of the things said. Like ignoring cases of wrongs based on religion, or persecuting atheists for their beliefs. I'll advise Anony and his ilk to consider the points raised.
Is there a point in that article worth considering? If the American brand of "freedom" is not fair enough for the chap, he should relocate to Iran. The dude "sounds" like a serial fault-finder to me. Liberal crybabies.
Christianity EtcRe: About The Trinity by SNCOQ3(m): 7:02pm On Jun 15, 2013
^ Amen to that.
Christianity EtcRe: About The Trinity by SNCOQ3(m): 6:27pm On Jun 15, 2013
^ So which is Jesus? A judge or an angel or another deity lesser than God(the Father). After picking one, pls do explain how it is consistent with rest of scriptures that is explicit about the divinity of Jesus.
----------------------
I edited the comment you quoted while u're at it; pls look it up. Sorry about that.
Christianity EtcRe: About The Trinity by SNCOQ3(m):
frosbel: Two things :

1. Jesus Christ is a god not GOD
2. You are yet to show us where in the bible mention is made explicitly referring to 3 gods =1 , until you can do that your position remains elusive.
Your God&god idea is polytheism.

-edit-
You are yet to show us a mathematical expression of love, until you can do that without employing the tool of abstractions, simplification, analogies, metaphors...you're in no position to question our use of tritheism( 3Ps in 1G, 1G in 3Ps) as an abstraction for the Trinity. Maybe...just maybe logic is overated afterall.
Christianity EtcRe: About The Trinity by SNCOQ3(m): 5:47pm On Jun 15, 2013
@ Anony,
I agree with your profound connection between the Trinity, God's perfect love for us and omniscience.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (of 17 pages)