₦airaland Forum

raumdeuter:
Not just easterners every Nigerian should hold the closest leaders accountable for lack of development

Many times our senators governors get a pass while we face Abuja all the time

The subservient attitude of our local and regional leaders allow for the so called marginalisation that is complained about. They should be held more accountable than the centre. That's how things will change.

larride:
You are saying rubbish. In 2017 when the Eastern Corridor rail was suppose to start, theres nothing like Kano to Maradi rail line. Kano to Maradi hasn't even started, MOU was just signed this January. The Kano to Maradi line will start from where the Ibadan to Kano route will stop from.

If the minister which was Amaechi didnt answer, how did they know the content of the document to start raising the issue of sovereignty or not?

It is the PH to Maiduguri line that is narrow gauge, not the proposed Lagos to Calabar railline that is STANDARD GUAGE. If you dont have any knowledge about anything, a simple google search should save you the embarrassment.

Keep making excuses for your leaders who have decided to play politics with your region so they can continue to use it to win elections. Lagos to Ibadan was proposed and funded without SW stalling the project, Ibadan to Kano has started, both the SW and the region it will pass through to get to Kano didnt stall the project also, by God's grace it will be completed soon. It is when it gets to the Lagos to Calabar line that your legislators start attacking the project so they can have something to blame Buhari for.

Dont hold your leaders accountable, continue to make excuses for them. Na you sabi.

Whether you are right or wrong about the facts, at the end it boils down to the bolded.

No excuses. The earlier easterners start holding their leaders accountable for lack of development the better the region will become. No excuses.

Jodera:
... Except Bravo tho who went to Man city.

But you're making my point. No good keeper would want to stay as second choice when he can easily get first choice as a number 1 in another club.

If Raya replaces Ramsdale this season (for example), I doubt Ramsdale (with the pedigree he has acquired in EPL) would want to sit and compete, instead he'll look for another club where he'll be guaranteed number 1 spot even if it's a lower club.


GKs competing for one spot is a whole lot different from Outfield players competing for one spot

We now have a very good squad that is expected go far in every competition. There will be over 50games to play. One keeper can focus on cups while the other on PL. Then when injury or red card happens, or when any of them starts to misbehave like Ramsdale last season, no problems.

Jodera:


But having Two great Keepers sha (in Raya and Ramsdale), I no know how e wan take work.

It couldn't work with Ter Stegen/Bravo for Barca
It couldn't work for Leno/Martinez for Arsenal.

I'm still looking for clubs that have two great Keepers and It worked for them in keeping both happy.

It'll be interesting to see how Arteta manages them

Na when injury happen you go know. Two is always better than one.

mostob:
Bro...so you think Arteta would plan for Timber to invert against City?! A new team? A new system? No bro. Havertz didn't drop deep, he was played as a 9 to provide an aerial outlet for our direct buildup.

All wrong.

First of all, Arteta always loves a back three. He loves the back three of Gabriel, Saliba and White.
Secondly, If Arteta did not plan for Timber to invert then he would not have started him on LB and White would not have played RB. Tierney would have been a better option at LB and Timber on RB. In the second half he brought in Tierney and Trossard to match the City formation in an all attacking formation.

As for Havertz, yes the plan was for him to play as a false 9. But when Man City appeared in the shape 4-4-2, everything changed. The presence of Alvarez and Haaland both pressing Gabriel and Saliba plus Walker and Akanji playing high up the pitch did not allow for the invertion. Timber could no longer invert as he wanted and Havertz had to drop to join Odegaard so that both of them can press at the same time.

It's a testimony of how far the team has developed so as to adjust shape during the game without it affecting their quality. When the game started, Man City easily dominated because Timber wanted to invert and Rice wanted to move up to join Odegaard in the press. But when they saw they were losing possession, the shape shifted and Rice dropped to join Partey to form a double pivot to stop Rodri and Kovacic, while Havertz dropped to assist Odegaard in the press to block their two CBs.
From...
.............................. Havertz.............................
Martinelli.... Rice............... Odegaard... Saka
............... Timber.............. Partey.....................
Gabriel.................. Saliba..................... White

To...

Martinelli... Havertz.... Odegaard.... Saka
.............. Rice......................... Partey............
Timber....... Gabriel....... Saliba........ White

Bombblacks:
If ECOWAS interfer and seize back the nation it will send a perfect message. What has happened in Mali and Guinea since the Col. Assimi Goita and Col. Mamady Doumbouya took over in those countries respectively? Absolutely nothing, no progress whatsoever. The one in Burkina Faso just goes around in military gears surrounded by armed guards, posing like a superman while doing nothing as well. Bunch of empty heads, Coupists don't have any economic roadmap to follow just like the visionless politicians they removed.

A divided ECOWAS cannot and should not remove a government whether legitimate or not. Just as UN Security Council decision can be vetoed by any of them, the region will be plunged into unending war if there is no unilateral decision on this matter.

Throwback:
Mumu!

Is Atiku asking for the school certificate that is already in the public domain and presented to INEC unlike Obi that only presented his GCE having failed WAEC?

I have attended foreign schools and there are rules regarding how they can handle my academic information and other credentials that is in their records.

You are a shameless loser who is hoping a miracle can present a loser with an opportunity to become President.

Stop your delusion. It will not happen.

My brother you are the actual mumu. School records are no secret especially when it's a subpoena from the courts. Employers check the school records of their staff even without them knowing to confirm their academic claims.

Why is Tinubu shrouded in secrecy? What are you people trying to hide? A criminal? Thunder 💥💥💥

IconicR:
Suit suit everywhere Laslas everybody will be alright. Asiwaju is not the first to win presidential election neither will he be the last. Na election he win he no kill person.

Which election did he win? 😂😂😂

Others have rigged and gone free but he unfortunately for him, he met the wrong generation. 😂😂😂

In an election many Nigerians were willing to make things work for the first time na him he want rig? Na lie. 😂😂😂

Curse777:




Why will you to go my school behind my back requesting my certificate


.

😂😂😂

🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

Itsrm:
Omo, our girls wan kill England o

That Plumtre dey take this matter personal.

https://punchng.com/atiku-has-filed-case-against-tinubu-in-us-aide/

Cc Raumdeuter

Tinubu's problem is no longer Peter Obi but Atiku. Man wants to dig his past.

Segedinho:
Na me dey front

This man take am easy make Tinubu bear his shame in peace.

No provoke the man use vex order atomic bomb. 😂😂😂

iamoyindamola:
She wan use doggy style enter( gbeyin wole) 🤣🤣

Amadioha eh!!!

😂😂😂😂😂

BlueRayDick:
Man city had 0 shots on target in the first half 😲

We have really come a long way o, our back line guys are doing well

Ramsdale was having an holiday throughout that half.

I said here that we are now at par with City in terms of quality and should really challenge for the title.

Roland17:
Nwanne,

Would there have been any need to invert any of our full backs since we were playing a double pivot? For me, I don't think so. Inverting any fullback would have backfired seriously against City and I think Arteta realized that when he picked his players and tactics. This is why I said he read the room perfectly today.

Inverting any full back with a double pivot would have overloaded the middle and left a glaring opening on the side we inverted and with City's crisp passing and quick transition, we would have suffered.

With the flat back 4 and a double 6 in front of them, we were able to restrict Grealish/ Bernado and when Foden came in, he had to invert into the middle, (see their first goal) because our fullbacks were quite discipline with/without the ball. This is why we did not need Martinelli nor Saka to do too much defensively.

One thing I have realized about Arteta and his defensive tactics is that he loves to play with 3 defenders at the back, irrespective of the combination and this is why he won't stop using White. When he plays Zinny and inverts him, we pretty much switch to a back 3 (White/ Gabu/ Saliba) with the ball while Zinny is roaming the middle.

You are 100% correct about this. Mine is why did Arteta not allow the FB to invert? I think it was an ingame decision seeing how Pep lined up.

I think that Arteta planned for Havertz to play 9 and Rice to play 8. I saw that early in the game. But he had to adjust and Rice settled in a double pivot.

I want to attribute this to Pep's masterclass tactics to nullify Arteta's plans. Pep tinkers a lot. I give it to him. He is the best no doubt.

Roland17:
I absolutely agree. My suggestion isn't as plan A but as a B because we saw how teams frustrated us last season.

As for Trossard, I love his decision making, he wastes no time in dangerous situations. However, I would still like to see him start from the wings and remain fluid or invert to the CF. He is dangerous when he plays from either side of the wing, particularly the left.

Ok I get your point. A a plan B it is very important. We have Nketiah for that but we don't trust him. With a decent CF, Tierney and Tomiyasu should be starting.

mostob:
There was no plan to invert.

There was. Timber was to invert and Rice moved up. I saw the attempt several times but due to the 4-4-2 Pep used it allowed Walker to take up advanced positions thereby forcing Timber to stay put.

It worked for them because Rodri and Kovacic were very mobile in midfield and controlled it especially early in the game.

Havertz was then forced to drop into midfield like Odegaard so that we can control it. We obviously played without a striker.

Roland17:
Our only unresolved or should I say challenging position is the CF. Balogun (If we somehow keep him)/ Nketiah/ Jesus may just be good enough considering how fluid and dynamic we will be with our wing play. I still wish we signed a true CF, especially against those low block teams.
#COYG

We don't need any true CF with this pattern. That's because he must need to drop into midfield all the time. The best person in our squad for that role apart from Jesus is Trossard. A Harry Kane would have been perfect though.

iamoyindamola:
This one is seeking attention 🤣🤣🤣

Your snide remarks that highest for the NL

😂😂😂

Roland17:
Crowning a good performance by winning the game is all I wanted. Like I said before the game, this is more of psychological game than anything. City tried to push that edge early with their press and possession but we recovered to finished strongly in the first and carried that into the 2nd. Arteta read the room and got his tactics well.

#COYG

I respect Pep coaching. He played a 4-4-2 and still held his own. That scattered Arteta's inverted fullback plan.

germaphobe:
You see that stone wey you hold for hand to Teta, you go hold am till hand heavy you

Important reminder.

Roland17 that stone wet you hold, na your punishment be that. 😂

Roland17:
Looooooord, see the enemies I was reporting you to this morning. Lord, for they have gathered, biko, don’t allow them laugh at me this season, scatter their gathering.

Nwanem, I don go mass this early morning to beg God. At some point, God need to pity Arsenal fans small.

God of Roland.

raumdeuter:
Ask the petitioner Atiku why he withdrew the subpoena

If an official can stand and validate it then why not. People lose their certificate everyday. When you submit certificate to an organization they still go to your school to validate it. The school validation is actually more important than paper certificate that can be made

Not just pinterest, he did it from snapchat

No sir. The court withdrew the subpoena. It says without prejudice. What it means is that they are hiding something.

Secondly, when you misplace your certificate you go to the school to get another copy. You don't go to Pinterest. Unless you have no certificate. Any body can validate anything. No validation can stand in the face of a certified true copy of any document.

My deduction is that the school has discovered that Bola Tinubu impersonated someone along the line and cannot be grant him another certificate. Instead they will block attempts to discredit him.

US as is their way, will keep records of secrets and criminal activities of world leaders so that they can always use it to control them. Tinubu is threatening to invade Niger because of the phone call from Kamala Harris. He has become their puppet.

raumdeuter:
The representative of the school who awarded him a certificate is in court to certify that Tinubu graduated from their school

If you want to turn amala leave me out. I don swallow akpu already.

1. Why was the subpoena withdrawn?

2. Can an affidavit stand in the face of certified credentials?

3. Why did Tinubu download his certificates he submitted to INEC from Pinterest.

Just answer one by one. Biko.

Segedinho:
Bombs everywhere..



Typing from Niger republic..


🤣🤣🤣🤣

El Oh El

🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

raumdeuter:
Spy360

https://www.nairaland.com/7792596/atikus-lawsuit-challenging-tinubus-attendance

In an affidavit, the registrar of Chicago State University, Caleb Westberg, deposed that “Bola Ahmed Tinubu graduated and was awarded a degree by Chicago State University on June 22, 1979.

I will ask you a few questions.

1. Why was the subpoena withdrawn?

2. Can an affidavit stand in the presence of certified credentials?

3. Why did Tinubu download the certificate he submitted to INEC from Pinterest?

garfield1:
Mynd44 nplfmod SEUN obinoscopy lalasticlala rule 2 and 3 violated.he abused and threatened me.apply maximum punishment

😂😂😂

Is this a joke or what. You saw superior argument and your response is to have me banned instead of thanking me for curing your ignorant head.

Funny enough I did not even insult or threaten you. Piss off.

Raumdeuter

https://politicsnigeria.com/breaking-senate-rejects-tinubus-request-for-military-intervention-in-niger/?utm_source=operamini&utm_medium=feednews&utm_campaign=operamini_feednews

garfield1:
I await the debunking but just like someone said here,you know obi has lost but choose to indulge in vain mischief

It's been modified. Check it again. 😂😂😂

casualobserver:
Oga stop using English words you clearly do not understand the meaning. You have not debunked anything.


debunk
verb [ T ] informal
UK /ˌdiːˈbʌŋk/ US /ˌdiːˈbʌŋk/
Add to word list
to show that something is less important, less good, or less true than it has been made to appear:

debunk Add to list Share
/ˈdiˌbəŋk/
/diˈbəŋk/
IPA guide
Other forms: debunking; debunked; debunks
When you debunk something you show it to be false. Many magicians, including Houdini and Penn and Teller, have worked to debunk the idea that magic is anything other than a very clever illusion.

To debunk something is to prove it wrong.

Sorry sir. I have modified the same post.

The grandeur of disillusion. You have been feeding your head wrong information. I should have ignored but for the sake of innocent readers, once again I will debunk ALL.

garfield1:
Notwithstanding the headline, this is surely how the court will rule.this is based on what the petitioners tendered in court,their final written address and replies.

This is simply irrational.

Ground one: Peter obi has not proven that he won the election and has not brought any proof to that effect.all his evidences points to the fact that tinubu won and that there was irregularities.even the mathematician prof ofoedu's analysis showed the only difference in the overall results was in benue,rivers and 18,000 units that were blurred.no evidence points to peter winning.it is safe to say that obi has abandoned this prayer and wants fresh polls.
For atiku,most of his evidences points to irregularities.a watery report akin to the 2019 server debacle focusing on 26 states tendered by Sam oduntan showed he won but did not give details as to how and was based only on irev data.atiku is focusing on disqualifying tinubu and declaring himself winner or a rerun.infact,evidences presented by both petitioners shows that election was conducted peacefully and the only issue was just upload which is supposed to be manual or electronic as provided by section 60-65 EA.

The CTCs of hardcopies of results INEC gave Peter Obi which were admitted in court showed that there were no results for 8,000 Polling Units (facts). The IREV copies which were supposed to verify the hardcopies showed 18088 blurred and unreadable results of polling units. All these were supplied by INEC. This amounts to over 2.5m votes. Substantial to cancel the elections altogether. However LP on their own submitted 10,000 results from the agents which showed they won all of those PU. The INEC supplied IREV and hardcopies also showed that LP won both Rivers and Benue states. So PO won more states than Tinubu and FCT and also majority of the votes. The result of this showed that if the court considers the elections compliant then they will have to rely on the alternative 10,000 agent copies of results from LP. INEC brought no alternative hard copies mind you. They couldn't have because they don't have them. So your claim that LP didn't bring evidence is a mad man's dream.

Ground 2:It is settled law that one will not only prove irregularities but do so substantially and show how it affected the overall results.Lp lawyers claim Inec promised electronic transmission but has failed to prove that inec failed to transmit electronically.the only called one witness to that effect who claimed that elections was free and fair.Atiku called five adhoc staffs who also testified to that effect.this unfortunately only affects the polling units they worked as evidence in election cases are restricted to each units.inec can easily call 10 staffs who will testify that results were sucessfully transmitted.in any case,the electoral act plus a fhc judgment gives inec the leeway to transmit anyhow.The court of appeal recently ruled that by virtue of section 60 of the EA,inec can choose,vary,change it's manner of transmission at any point.In other words,both manual and electronic transmission are allowed.those witnesses that said they couldn't transmit didn't blame inec but the bvas and eventually sent the results to the collation units.the purpose of electronic transmission by virtue of section 60-65 of the EA2022 is to aid collation.no collation officer was called to testify.again,the law says the collation officer will compare the hardcopy with the transmitted results.the transmitted result that was uploaded is still on the bvas in image form so the collation staff can easily look at the bvas image and form ec8a.The EA clearly specified transmit or transfer.transfer mainly has to do with manual activities while transmit is electronic.further reading of the manual guidelines will expose more on this.

Lp also called an amazon staff to show that there was no glitch.apart from the fact that she is partisan and on her own frolic without AWS permit,she confirmed that they could be localized glitch within inec. she had no letter of employment or ID but presented a letter of work history which was downloaded a day earlier plus it was unsigned rendering it inadmissible.even if there was a glitch,it does not prove anything.the adeleke vs oyetola supra 2022 case placed reliance on physical evidence and tagged online evidences as thirdhand and unreliable.inec director provided incontrovertible evidence showing localized glitches and network issues
The only quarter concrete evidence of irregularities obi provided was from 18000 units of blurred results which was based only on irev which are secondary results.lp lawyers should have verified with primary hardcopies.if they could be a leeway, it will be from here as 9 mil voters are domiciled here and 2.5 mil voters came out during the last polls.in another rerun,fewer will come out.outside this,no substantial infraction has been proven.nothing compelling has been tendered.see okereke vs umahi 2015 supra.obi petition is full of mere allegations and averments and these are not evidence.see uzodinma vs pdp supra 2020.most of the evidences tendered were not pleaded.see the above case laws.Lp failed to provide inec top copies and a comparison with top copies from rivers showed that the irev was unreliable.in adeleke vs oyetola,jsc Agim clearly stated that the bvas and server materials could be affected by network issues,printer error,scanning issue,bad camera etc which further proves it's unreliability
To further destroy obi's case,the apex court has severally stated that guidelines cannot be a ground for election petition.see wike vs dakuku, okereke vs supra,pdp vs yari...

Even the respondents SANs didn't bring this foolish argument. What the FHC said was simply that INEC will choose how they will collate results. The EA gave INEC the power to decide how to collate results. The question you should be asking is what method did INEC choose? Your answer is in the INEC guidelines for election. It was the same guidelines that their staff were trained upon. By law any staff that didn't follow the guidelines can be prosecuted and jailed for minimum of 6months. What is in the guideline? Realtime upload of results to IREV and that IREV should be used as secondary data to verify hardcopies in case of disputes. Now that there is disputes IREV failed and you think there is substantial compliance? All parties agreed that the IREV data should not be different from the hardcopy. But evidence show that they are different. Fact is INEC did not follow what they prescribed. The Oyetola and Adeleke case is a clear precedent on this where the SC declared that the hardcopy and IREV are mandatory election matters. What is post election is the Record of Election Results Archive which is clearly different from IREV.

Ground three: No arguments has been canvassed on the fct matter so it can be seemed abandoned.but if not,a community reading of section 28,section 42 and 299 of the constitution has placed fct as a state.the body language,orbiter dictum,innuendoes of the court has shown where they will stand.again,the principle of legal ambiguity presupposes that where an ambiguity in law exists,the jurists will choose the most sensible, meaningful option for the lawmakers are not confusionists or intend to create chaos.Again,all the laws quoted by the Lp lawyers support this position.
In reality,fct is less than a state and cannot all of a sudden be elevated above a state without bringing equality first.moreover,other similar democracies do not practice such absurd voting system...section 134 of the constitution provided 2 requirements.if it intended to make Fct mandatory,a third requirement would have been separately provided below as no 3.
Again, section 22-28 states that all persons have equal voting rights likewise all voting areas.no place is superior to another.this supercedes whatever 134 may be implying because an earlier provision of the constitution supercedes a later one.section 299 sees fct as a state.the courts have severally stated that the fct is neither superior or inferior to a state.

First of all, the FCT does not need any argument. It is the prerogative of the court to interpret the constitution. And a literal interpretation simply shows that FCT is mandatory. There is no going back on this. Even Olanipekun has accepted it. I don't know why you are still being ignorant. Or are you not following the trends?

Ground three: section 182 d and e clearly says within a period of 10 years,he has been imprisoned or convicted by any court in nigeria.tinubu forfeiture wasn't a conviction and even if,10 years has elapsed and the judgment wasn't registered in Nigeria.that subsection further states that he must be under imprisonment or a sentence flowing or arising from a conviction and tinubu is not under any conviction.civil cases do not lead to convictions.moreover,he was never charged,arraigned or found guilty of any thing.what happened was that three of his accounts were frozen via an exparte order by us authorities with links to two convicts.he now proved to the court and fbi that money in two accounts were his and the one belonging to the other remaining account wasn't his.so,in a mutual agreement supervised by the court,two accounts were unfrozen and one forfeited as part of a compromise or out of court settlement.
The Lp quoted Austin vs USA to support their case but this case was a criminal case where there was a trial and conviction.in Tims vs Indiana,the accused pleaded guilty in court and was convicted.therefore,this is inapplicable here as section 68 of the evidence act States that a foreign law will be subjected to a municipal court.the reciprocal agreement has made it mandatory for all foreign judgments to be registered.this prayer is dead.let me kill it further by stating that Obi failed to call a lawyer vested in American law.barr nwakaeti only visited america once and provided scant knowledge of the US system.he also failed to call witnesses from the us judicial or prosecuting authorities.current evidences like the 2003 letter from us embassy and his recent visits to the USA shows he has no issues there.

The petitioners case is based on Section 134:1(d). That law did not bother itself on whether there is a conviction or not. It only stated that the person should be disqualified if they are ever fined for acts involving dishonesty. Forfeiture is a fine, and narcotics and money laundering are acts of dishonesty injurious to mankind. One thing that all parties agree to including you is that Tinubu is a drug criminal who ran away from US to avoid being jailed. The forfeiture was done as a punishment for his crimes.

Ground four; the shettima issue has been buried by the supreme court.they clearly stated that it was a pre election matter and internal to a party and that it can only extend beyond if he was nominated by 2 parties.section 84 of the electoral act clearly makes nomination a pre election matter and only aspirants have locus standi.double nomination is not a constitutional matter and only constitutional matters pertaining to qualifications can be raised at a tribunal.again,the apex court found out that shettima was never guilty of double nomination and lp has no new evidence necessitating a review.

Stop deceiving yourself. A matter is pre-election if election have not held. Before election only a party member can challenge. After election it becomes a post election matter where fellow contestants can challenge. Your illusion with locus standi is your undoing. Shettima was nominated as VP on 14th June the same day his name was submitted to INEC. APC submitted his withdrawal from senate race the following day on 15th June. The documents are all there. All these information came from INEC. So no capping.

You should be more scared of the APM petition. That one is express disqualification based on invalid nomination. The VP placeholder Masari withdrew on the 24th of May (undisputed by all parties), Shettima was nominated on the 14th of June (undisputed by all parties). That leaves a period of more than 14days that invalidates the presidential ticket of Tinubu. This one is straight knockout. No going back.

6) concerning perjury,the inec form has two questions on nationality.whether one has ever changed nationality? This is a No for tinubu.secondly,whether tinubu has ever voluntarily acquired citizenship elsewhere.this is a no because he never sought for guinean citizenship,he was only conferred and given a diplomatic passport to that effect.
On the so-called evidences supplied by atiku witness,the witness a lawyer rubbished most of them in what we call hostile testimony. Again,it is settled law that an expired document in law is inadmissible Atiku failed to call a witness from Guinea or someone vested in guinean law to testify .
The Female gender was recorded in his transcript and he never submitted transcript to inec as it's not a constitutional requirement. Again,the documents was gotten from a lawyer Mr kowtals who has no links with the schools tinubu attended.he should have called witnesses from the issuing documents as only the maker can competently prove it's authenticity.pdp and lp quoted degi vs diri to support their case but the court recently in edevbie vs sheriff stated that they have departed from that judgment.in oyetola vs adeleke,they stated that when a dispute about a document arises,the testimony of the issuing authority will settle the tie.Adekunle has been in his name and the apex court has severally ruled on name variations.Atiku failed to prove that it is not part of his name.the age differences is of no effect as the apex court noted that as far as a candidate is up to 40 years,he is good to go.see AGI vs ayade supra..

Once again you are drunk on your own lies. Tinubu's EC9 form showed that he claimed not to have any other citizenship. He has also not denied having Guinean citizenship. His defence was that citizenship ends when the passports expires. That lame and foolish submission by his lawyer is the worst statement ever made in court by a SAN.

As per his school certificates, what he presented to INEC were fake documents download from Pinterest. The school Chicago State University under subpoena sent the original documents which were certified as true copies. Your foolish SAN and you are arguing that no witness from the school came to testify. Are you guys on colos? A organisation that sent their CTC does not need to appear in person when the documents already speak for themselves.

This matter will be dismissed with 1 billion naira fine to be paid by the petitioners each to each of the respondents.cooouurrrt.

This last one is just the hallmark of the clownishness all agbado people enjoy.

If the judiciary fail to disqualify Tinubu, then just know that justice will never be achieved in this country. Never. And no body will ever again approach the courts for Electoral petition. What this mean is that the country will sink into anarchy and violent settlement of election disputes. Tinubu ticks all the boxes for someone who should never be president of Nigeria.

Mynd44
Nplfmod
Seun
Mukina2
Penguin2
Fergie001
Obinoscopy
Casualobserver
Coolambience
Helinues
Yarimo
Quotasystem
Svoboda
Oghenaogie
Efewestern
Aiel123
Afamed
Mrvitalis
Spy360
Esseite
Silvertongue
Asobo
Donphilopus
Generalpula
Muykem
Alphagan
Iamgrey
Raumdeuter
Ejimatic
Zoedew
Litigator[/quote]