₦airaland Forum

A system fit for Britain

Since February, following an extensive consultation, I have been working to develop a balanced policy on permanent settlement. A system fit for Britain, that can stand the test of time.

From the outset, I have been clear that any reforms must be both fair and firm – fair to those who genuinely contribute to our country, and firm in ensuring that our immigration system supports economic growth, protects public services, and does not place additional pressure on the welfare system.

Since the consultation into settlement closed in February, I have been working closely with officials to develop a better approach than a blanket retrospective extension from five years to ten years for everyone. It is my strong belief that those who have come to the United Kingdom on care worker visas – who have played by the rules and have genuinely contributed to our care system – should not be required to wait longer to apply for settlement. That is the issue I am working hard to address. I am sure many readers will have experience of dedicated care workers from overseas helping them or their loved ones during difficult times.

At the same time, we cannot ignore the scale of migration in recent years. Under the previous government, net migration reached unprecedented levels, with around one in every thirty people now living in the UK having arrived during the last four years. More than 600,000 health and care visas were issued during that period to help fill just 40,000 jobs.

We now face the reality that a substantial number of people will become eligible for settlement over the coming years. If unmanaged, that could place further pressure on already stretched public services, including welfare and social housing. That is why it is essential that we strike the right balance; recognising contribution while ensuring the system remains sustainable and fair.

Alongside ensuring we strike the right balance within our Earned Settlement reforms, I am also exploring better solutions for overseas care workers and the sponsorship model under which they are employed. It is right that this route remains closed to new overseas recruitment, but we can and should improve the system for those already here and working in the sector.

Moving towards a fairer sponsorship model, which would allow care workers greater flexibility to move between approved care providers, could significantly improve standards across the sector, strengthen worker protections, and help build a more resilient health and social care system.

The current sponsorship model has created a race to the bottom. Low pay, poor conditions and exploitation have become far too common. That is not acceptable, and it is not the British way.

I am working closely with colleagues in the Department of Health and Social Care on these issues, although no final decisions have yet been made.

My time in the Home Office has also highlighted just how complex and difficult to navigate Britain’s legal migration system has become. Across the board it requires simplification, modernisation and reform – and that work is already underway.

We are progressing, but it is vital that we get this right. Immigration policy is interconnected, and changes in one area can create unintended consequences elsewhere. That is why we are taking the necessary time to fully develop these reforms, assess their impacts, and ensure that the policies we implement deliver the outcomes we intend.

I hope to provide further updates in the autumn as this work progresses.

Mike Tapp
Minister for Migration and Citizenship

A system fit for Britain

Since February, following an extensive consultation, I have been working to develop a balanced policy on permanent settlement. A system fit for Britain, that can stand the test of time.

From the outset, I have been clear that any reforms must be both fair and firm – fair to those who genuinely contribute to our country, and firm in ensuring that our immigration system supports economic growth, protects public services, and does not place additional pressure on the welfare system.

Since the consultation into settlement closed in February, I have been working closely with officials to develop a better approach than a blanket retrospective extension from five years to ten years for everyone. It is my strong belief that those who have come to the United Kingdom on care worker visas – who have played by the rules and have genuinely contributed to our care system – should not be required to wait longer to apply for settlement. That is the issue I am working hard to address. I am sure many readers will have experience of dedicated care workers from overseas helping them or their loved ones during difficult times.

At the same time, we cannot ignore the scale of migration in recent years. Under the previous government, net migration reached unprecedented levels, with around one in every thirty people now living in the UK having arrived during the last four years. More than 600,000 health and care visas were issued during that period to help fill just 40,000 jobs.

We now face the reality that a substantial number of people will become eligible for settlement over the coming years. If unmanaged, that could place further pressure on already stretched public services, including welfare and social housing. That is why it is essential that we strike the right balance; recognising contribution while ensuring the system remains sustainable and fair.

Alongside ensuring we strike the right balance within our Earned Settlement reforms, I am also exploring better solutions for overseas care workers and the sponsorship model under which they are employed. It is right that this route remains closed to new overseas recruitment, but we can and should improve the system for those already here and working in the sector.

Moving towards a fairer sponsorship model, which would allow care workers greater flexibility to move between approved care providers, could significantly improve standards across the sector, strengthen worker protections, and help build a more resilient health and social care system.

The current sponsorship model has created a race to the bottom. Low pay, poor conditions and exploitation have become far too common. That is not acceptable, and it is not the British way.

I am working closely with colleagues in the Department of Health and Social Care on these issues, although no final decisions have yet been made.

My time in the Home Office has also highlighted just how complex and difficult to navigate Britain’s legal migration system has become. Across the board it requires simplification, modernisation and reform – and that work is already underway.

We are progressing, but it is vital that we get this right. Immigration policy is interconnected, and changes in one area can create unintended consequences elsewhere. That is why we are taking the necessary time to fully develop these reforms, assess their impacts, and ensure that the policies we implement deliver the outcomes we intend.

I hope to provide further updates in the autumn as this work progresses.

Mike Tapp
Minister for Migration and Citizenship

Lexusgs430:
This petition is probably not required..... Simply because the proposed changes, would ONLY be applicable to new applications (assuming law is passed)...... 😊😁

I have been following your posts regarding this matter. You are always so sure it won’t be applicable to existing skilled worker visa holders. Is there sth you are not telling us? Bros I no trust you ooo abi you dey chill with Home Secretary lowkey

Quick ones guys. Asides from the house deposit fee, can the Lisa funds also be used to pay for the extra costs associated with buying a house?

For example solicitor fee, broker/mortgage fee, stamp duty etc.

Or is it advisable to open a separate savings account towards these extra costs.

Thanks

NezzyMike:
I have also heard about it. They are no morr given 60 days ultimatum to leave the country. Why should someone who left his home country to come work for you to be sent back because he lost the sponsorship without being the cause? This is so unfair.

Who am I to argue that you didn’t hear about it?

All I am saying is that this is a public forum where thousands of people come to get information. The least anyone can do is to give information with backings from the UK Gov website.

Immigration information is so sensitive that a little mistake can ruin someone’s immigration history.

chubbyman:
God i wonder who is the pathetic one, just cause the home office has not released an official statement to support my statement does not make it false anyways if you don't believe it, that is your problem cause i hjave said my piece, i am not the one in a conundrum.

Omo!!!

Your piece is misleading bruv, take your L with your full chest. You have clearly fumbled!!!

IcecoldDon:
Oga@Lexusgs430, please could you direct me to your comment on items to check for before going for an MOT? I thought I had it saved somewhere but can't find it.

Google garages near you when you can get a FREE or at most £10 vehicle health check (VHC).

It’s not a guarantee to pass MOT but they will be able to advise you if anything needs to be fixed or if any thing can jeopardise your car’s chances of passing it’s MOT.

kwakudtraveller:
This is crazy!!!!

Fcuuking Hell!!!

lavida001:
Care worker can now bring in dependants

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/immigration-rules/immigration-rules-appendix-skilled-worker

Just like dat 😂😂😂😂 Whatchu smokin’ braa?

Controlv:
Thanks for sharing. Hopefully the inflation pay for 24/25 will push the B3 pay to 23,500 if awarded at 3%.

London should get ready for those of us on B6 that couldn't get the COS before April 4 due to Trusts policy of issuing COS 3 months to current visa expiry.

Exactly my point, I’m not really bothered cos I believe the agenda for change 24/25 will push band 3 entry pay to at least more than £23,200

Hopefully by June/July the new pay rate for nhs should be out

Read extensively for those seeking band 3 nhs sponsorship

https://www.nhsemployers.org/articles/impacts-changes-uk-immigration-policy?utm_campaign=1667409_NHS%20Workforce%20Bulletin%3A%2025%20March%202024&utm_medium=email&utm_source=NHS%20Confederation&dm_i=6OI9,ZQKX,4A1F5H,4GV5D,1

Read extensively especially for those seeking Band 3 nhs sponsorship

https://www.nhsemployers.org/articles/impacts-changes-uk-immigration-policy?utm_campaign=1667409_NHS%20Workforce%20Bulletin%3A%2025%20March%202024&utm_medium=email&utm_source=NHS%20Confederation&dm_i=6OI9,ZQKX,4A1F5H,4GV5D,1

AgentXxx:
God bless everyone that shared info about this 0% purchase credit card 🙌. I just got approved for 0% for 21months with a generous credit limit. I will start preparing for ILR payment using the card.😋

To the brother who shared the initial issues, God bless you as your gist brought solution to so many people.

I will end my post with a quote from our own Prof: Layi once said “InFO la fi nFO” if you don’t understand ask a Yoruba friend 😝

Share provider name nah

Lexusgs430:
For all switchers....... Santander is offering £185.00.......😊😂💷

When they say pay in £1500 into the account, must it stay there till the £185 is paid.

Does anyone know why an insurance company won’t renew your premium.

I reached out to the customer care but they couldn’t give any reason.

I don go back to admiral jeje since marshmallow has refused to give me a renewal quote.

Only downside is admiral says I can’t protect my 2 yrs NCB. The minimum is 4years

Lexusgs430:
A note of warning regarding vehicle insurance....... Those searching for much cheaper policies, some ghost brokers have appeared on the insurance scene.........

You think you're covered, but you have simply been scammed....... If the police shines their blue light on your tail........ You would be treated as an uninsured driver, vehicle would be seized and you would have to explain yourself to the magistrates......... 😉🤣

They should be able to check on the askMID website if they are actually insured.

Zahra29:
Front door routes include skilled worker visas and their dependants, family visas such as spousal visas, refugee applications etc - where the settlement intent is transparent.

It's "bad" because students are traditionally expected to return home after their studies, in fact many students attest to this during their visa applications.
The government wouldn't grant 300k plus student visas if it thought they would all stay permanently and bring their families along also. For context, the government has pledged for many years to reduce net immigration to less than 100k a year - immigration from the student route alone would swamp this figure.

Study route is the most common route to relocation and this has been going on for decades even the government knows this. And it’s a Front door route as long as it’s done legally.

But old build was once a new build

Meaning these new builds will become an old build someday

I don confuse sef 🤦‍♂️

hustla:
Okay then, I will call them tmr or Monday

Are you allowed to pay it in bits? Maybe £40 x 3 times

No idea if one can pay in bits

ehizario2012:
It might be easier and faster to learn. But can u pls explain how it saves money? In the same statement, you said manual cars are cheaper. How far?

This is very simple. Just go to any car dealership website & search any car of the same model in auto and manual.

Come back and report here on the price differences

hustla:


I thought there would be an easy way to do it nah

I don't like calls but it appears there no other option

Had same issues, said I owe £159 but couldn’t pay online. Called them & I was guided on how to make the payment while on the call. Wait time was about 20mins before I was able to speak to an agent.

The guy told me to go to gov.uk website, search for “simple assessment” and then click on “pay simple assessment tax bill”.

In the letter I received, there was a reference number and I quoted it before making payment.

hustla:
Please o

HMRC said I owe £120 and I have been trying to pay since but I am unable to pay on their platform. Sent them a msg and got this but it's a bit confusing, I think the letter was even sent to my old address

Due date is April and I thought they would be deducting it from my monthly pay but it appears I have to pay using a card or something

It’s very simple. Call them!!!

Lender is offering me 13.4% APR for a car finance. Is this a good deal or I should try my luck and see if I can get a lesser APR.

But my fear is that, hope this current APR won’t leave a footprint on my credit file and make other lenders want to offer me a high APR.

bidemi1190:
Please between Mental health nursing and Psychology which has better prospect in the uk ?

Mental Heath Nursing jobs will rush you like ant dey rush sugar

stephoye:
Have you seen anyone who have tried it and got rejected?

If your partner and child are not with you in the UK as dependants on your student visa, they wont be able to come to the UK as your dependants on a graduate visa.

You can go ahead if your lawyer insists, maybe you will be the first person I will know that gets rejected.

stephoye:
Good evening all. Have you seen anyone who brings his/her dependents to the UK while on graduate visa?My employer lawyers are telling me that I can bring them while on graduate visa. Please I need your reply ASAP. Thanks

You can’t.

Solumtoya:
It's a very decent car. Another good one is the Mazda CX5

How about Nissan Qashqai, 2015 upwards, Do you reckon it’s a good buy?

Mamatukwas:
How do you guys save useful posts like this for later?

I screenshot useful posts whenever I see them. So just imagine the number of nairaland screenshots in my photo gallery.

Honestly Seun should upgrade this UI but he won’t listen.

thammy021:
Good afternoon everyone, please is it possible to apply twice on the same COS(certificate of sponsorship), my cousin applied and was denied due to 3.5 score in Listening on her IELTS. She has re-written the exam and passed all aspect above 4.0, can she still re-apply with the same COS after a rejection?

Well according to the gov website, you should request another CoS because the one that cousin used to apply has been used (whether it’s a successful application or not)

But I remember someone arguing here that they have reused a CoS before, I don’t know how true that is.

ehizario2012:
Seriously?? Didn't know this o. Does this mean someone with a domiciliary care CoS for example can apply and also hold a care home CoS without switching? You mean it's possible to have two employers? Kindly clarify...

I’m not sure I understand your question but I believe the reason you have another CoS is so you can switch to that company. If you don’t switch, it will expire after 3 months. You also cannot start working for that company until your application is successful.


Even on the other hand, according to the uk gov website, you can have two employers with two different CoS which will allow you to work more than 20hrs with one of them. I haven’t met anyone with this but you can find more information on the website.

giselle237:
Sorry a couple of my colleagues have had this same issue. Not one. Not five. Not twelve. I am not here to argue with you or anyone else. Shalom

Well, I am saying this has happened to me and a couple of other friends which some are nairaland users.

Infact one of them had a CoS from Company A which sponsored her at the time and had CoS certificates assigned to her from 2 diff companies B and C concurrently, one of which was NHS. She later switched to her company of choice.

Not arguing either, only talking from experience.

NewT123:
You are right, no need to ask for cancellation as you can have more than one COS. When you get a visa with a COS, the other COS automatically becomes invalid.

Shikena!!!