Christianity Etc › Re: Quran Testifies To The Bible: It Says It Stands Till Eternity by truthmans2012: 2:06pm On Apr 22, 2016 |
najib632: please i will like you to stop thinking that Allah is another diety apart from God. Allah is the arabic word for God, and the issue about the bible has not been changed is crap look around how many bibles exist today and every year the bible is modified. The bible can never be compared to the Qur'an. Look at the unintelligent way the bible said the world was created no scientist belives but all of the agree with Islamic version, the Quran talks about the formation of an embryo in a very authentic form no doctor can argue with it the Qur'an talked clearly about the expansion of the universe something that was discovered not so long ago. If the holy war never happened Europeans wont know what is science. Even algebra was formed from the Qur'an if you doubt any oof these things I have stated ask google. Allah guides whom he wills What you said the quran says doesn't make it a revelation from God. Satan knows all those. Qur'an 109:1-6 makes it clear that Allah is not Yahweh that people knew as God before Muhammad's islam: [Qiran 109:1-6] 1. Say: O disbelievers! (i.e the Jews and Christians who believed not in Allah as in Quran 9:29) 2. I worship not that which ye worship; 3. Nor worship ye that which I worship. 4. And I shall not worship that which ye worship. 5. Nor will ye worship that which I worship. 6. Unto you your religion, and unto me my religion. Muhammad was told by allah to tell the people that what he was worshiping (Allah) wasn't what the Jews and Christians were worshiping (Yahweh). But it was Yahweh people knew as God before Muhammad was born. In fact there were Christians in Mecca at that time. Since allah is not Yahweh, who is he? The truth is, allah was one of the 360 idols inside Kaaba and the head of them. This is the reason Allah and the true God are not the same. |
Islam › Re: Qur'an 109:6: The Height Of Hypocrisy by truthmans2012: 12:19pm On Apr 21, 2016 |
mustymatic: There are authentic Hadiths that clearly show that Wurud is referring to the passing over the path, which is erected over the Hellfire – may Allaah Almighty protect us from it. People will go across it, and their speed will be according to their deeds, a fact that we learn from Hadiths Which is more authentic, hadiths or quran ? Quran 3:185] Every soul will taste of death. And ye will be paid on the Day of Resurrection only that which ye have fairly earned. Whoso is removed from the Fire and is made to enter paradise, he indeed is triumphant. The life of this world is but comfort of illusion. "Whoso is removed from the FIRE" means all muslims will be inside hellfire first before some will be removed. But the truth is what qualifies you to enter hellfire first will make you to remain there forever. My opinion is in agreement with these: Tafsir by Ibn Kathir on Surah 19:71: Surah 19:71: “Not one of you but will pass through it: this is, with thy Lord, a Decree which must be accomplished.” Imam Ahmad narrated that Sulaiman Ibn Harb narrated that Khalid Ibn Sulaiman narrated that Kathir Ibn Ziad Al- Barsani narrated that Abu Sumaya said, "We differed about the meaning of ‘Passing through it’ (wari-duha). For some of us said that no believer will enter hell and others said all (people) shall enter it and then Allah will save those who have done righteousness. Then I met Jabir Ibn Abdallah and I informed him that we differed about the meaning of, ‘Pass through it,’ and he replied that, “ Everyone shall enter it.”Tafsir by Ibn Kathir on Surah 19:71, Translated from Arabic) Another Tafsir by Ibn Kathir on Surah 19:71: Narrated by Abdel Razak, narrated by Ibn Ayena narrated by Amru who told us that he heard Ibn Abbas feud with Nafi Ibn Al-Azraq regarding the meaning of, ‘Entering (Al-wurood).’ He said it meant ‘Entering (Hell),’ but Nafi disagreed. Thus Ibn Abbas read (Surah 21:98) “‘Verily ye, and the gods that ye worship besides Allah, are but fuel for Hell! To it will ye surely will enter (Wardan),’ and asked did they enter or not? He also read (Surah 11:98) ‘He will go before his people on the Day of Judgment, and lead them (Awrada-hum) into the fire: but woeful indeed will be the place (Wird) to which they are led (Al-mawrud)!’ Did they enter or not? As for you and I, we will enter it but let us see if we will exit from it and I don’t see Allah taking you out of it because you lie (regarding its meaning).” Nafi then laughed. Narrated by Ibn Jarir, narrated by Atta who stated that Abu Rashid Al-Harury, who is called Nafi Ibn Al-Azraq, said, "They (the believers) will not hear hell’s roar." So Ibn Abbas responded, "Woe to you! Are you insane? What of Allah’s verse (Surah 11:98) ‘He will go before his people on the Day of Judgment, and lead them (Awrada-hum) into the fire,’ and also the verse (Surah 19:86) ‘And We shall drive the sinners to hell being lead (Wirdan)’? And also the verse (Surah 19:71) ‘Not one of you but will pass (Waridu-ha) through it’? By Allah, the supplication of those who lived previously used to be, ‘O Allah take me out of hell fire peacefully and allow me to enter paradise victorious.’" (Tafsir by Ibn Kathir on Surah 19:71, Translated from Arabic) Source: Ministry of Islamic Affairs, Saudi Arabia. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Quran Testifies To The Bible: It Says It Stands Till Eternity by truthmans2012: 8:20pm On Apr 20, 2016 |
mustymatic: And you want your posts to be responded to next time... aiii Not necessarily, only if you have something meaningful. |
Islam › Re: Proof: No Hadith Was Fabricated, It Is A Lie !!! by truthmans2012: 5:17pm On Apr 20, 2016 |
truthman2012: Al-taqquiyah expert !!!
How long will it take you respond?
Blatant Liar like Muhammad and his quran. |
Islam › Re: Confusion: Who Was The First Muslim ? by truthmans2012: 5:12pm On Apr 20, 2016 |
annunaki2: The sooner you get it into your head that the quoran is not from God but it's just a collection of sayings concocted by mohamed and attributed to God to deceive his followers into believing he is a prophet of God. A close and objective study of the quoran will tell you it's full of errors, contradictions, inconsistencies and outright lies with zero beneficial value to mankind. The quoran is all the evidence you need to know that both islam and mohamed are frauds. |
Islam › Re: Confusion: Who Was The First Muslim ? by truthmans2012: 4:42pm On Apr 20, 2016 |
Muslims na !!!
Who bi di first muslim na ?
Abi una no sabi quran again? |
Christianity Etc › Re: Quran Testifies To The Bible: It Says It Stands Till Eternity by truthmans2012: 4:38pm On Apr 20, 2016 |
mustymatic: smh
The aim of the verse is merely to repudiate the illusion cherished by the Jews that, by virtue of their being Jews, they have a monopoly of salvation. They had long entertained the notion that a special and exclusive relationship existed between them and God. They thought, therefore, that all who belonged to their group were predestined to salvation regardless of their beliefs and actions,. whereas all non-Jews were predestined to serve as fodder for hell-fire. To clarify this misgiving the Jews are told that what really matters in the sight of God is true faith and good deeds rather than formal affiliation with a certain religious community. Whoever has true faith and good deeds to his credit is bound to receive his reward, since God will judge people on the basis of merit rather than on the grounds that a man's name happens to be listed in the world as a member of one religious community or the other. Trash as usual. Meaningless. |
Islam › Re: Qur'an 109:6: The Height Of Hypocrisy by truthmans2012: 11:45am On Apr 20, 2016 |
Visitor700 The jews didn't persecute him but they made several attempts to kill himWhere and when was the attempt made ? Ishaq 464 The Jews were made to come down, and Allah’s Messenger imprisoned them. Then the Prophet went out into the marketplace of Medina, and he had trenches dug in it. He sent for the Jewish men and had them beheaded in those trenches. They were brought out to him in batches. They numbered 800 to 900 boys and men. From that source, it is clear Muhammad did the killing on that particular occasion. He first imprisoned them before he beheaded them. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Quran Testifies To The Bible: It Says It Stands Till Eternity by truthmans2012: 11:13am On Apr 20, 2016 |
mustymatic: Can you tell us in what way modern christians follow jesus....by worshiping him? did he worship himself? or better did he ask you to? that is a misconception even among Christians. some will tell you he is god, others will say he has a god, and some will tell you he is one of the three gods...And then...they are called christians Stop the trash my friend. What did the Christians believe in the time of Muhammad as the quran makes us to know? Yet the quran says Christians are going to heaven with their belief. That is to say all the wrong accusations levelled against the Christians by muslims and the quran is a nullity. Quran 2:62] Lo! Those who believe (in that which is revealed unto thee, Muhammad), and those who are Jews, and Christians, and Sabaeans - whoever believeth in Allah and the Last Day and doeth right - surely their reward is with their Lord, and there shall no fear come upon them neither shall they grieve. Since the Jews and Christians are going to heaven with reward, why was Muhammad killing them? You should be able to see now that the quran is satanic manipulation. Please note that what the Chrisrians in Muhammad's time believed that made them to qualify for heaven is what we believe now. The Bible says we are going to heaven, the quran says the same, meaning double assurance. But for muslims quran says they are going to hell (Qur'an 3:185, 19:68-71). Which do you prefer, heaven or hell? |
Christianity Etc › Re: Islamic Prayer by truthmans2012: 9:39pm On Feb 21, 2016 |
plappville: Islam promotes terrorism. I always admire your photo talk. Keep it up. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Islamic Prayer by truthmans2012: 3:43pm On Feb 21, 2016 |
DeathStroke007: Like I always tell you, you are a fool..
Tell me where Jesus told you that you can pray anywhere... Huuuum !!! Muhammad's jihadist. Where did Jesus tell us to pray ? |
Christianity Etc › Re: Who Is This Allah (chapter 1) By G.J.O MOSHAY by truthmans2012: 3:24pm On Feb 21, 2016 |
Keenysbojan: If a Muslim reader is confused at this juncture, he has enough reasons to be. But we do not intend to weary anybody with this confusion. So, let us come down and agree on one point and then proceed. Some enlightened Muslims believe that it would be more reasonable to regard the book as the written form of the verbal message given to Muhammad, and so a revelation. Reading through the comments of most Islamic scholars who translated the Quran, one easily sees that apart from their stereotypical romanticism, they too are not sure of the authorship of the book. All they can say is that it is the book of Allah.
A careful student who reads it either in the Arabic or in translations will see that apart from direct quotes from reported events, some parts of the narratives are in the first person plural, while some are in the third person and then first person singular, and so on. There are places where Allah is being addressed by the writer. The writer seems to forget he should maintain the narrative as coming from Allah and suddenly changes the narrative. For example, when the speaker-writer says: " I swear by Allah that they will not believe....", one wonders who is speaking - Allah or a writer? Or how could these statements have existed in heaven in a book before creation?
Some historians have attempted to prove that the Quran was written neither by Muhammad nor even during his lifetime. They say Muhammad was, in fact, illiterate. According to then, the book we call the Quran today is a product of some zealots of Islam under supervision of a caliph, who, after the death of their master felt they must have a sacred book just as Christians and the Jews for their religion; and so they tried to recollect what their leader was preaching before his death. Part of it is said to be from the parchment written and kept before the death of the prophet. According to the Hadith, some of the fragments were collected from "tablets of stone,ribs of palm branches,camels' shoulder-blades and ribs, pieces of board, and the breasts of men - (that is from men's memory)".
The first attempt of compilation is said to have been made by Muhammad's daughter, Fatima, who had to contest some of the facts with some followers of her father since there were different versions being recited by the people. Muhammad's wife, Hafsa, also helped in the compilation. The final work, however, is credited to Zaid ibn Thabit, whom some believe as merely the editor.
Because of the predominant use of the first person plural and singular narratives, we will accept for now that there was being from whom Muhammad was receiving his messages, and this being is called 'Allah' in Arabic; and that even if the book was written by the followers after his death, it is not impossible to remember some of the words of Muhammad when he was being inspired to recite the Quran
This position is necessary to establish our logic. If we accept the Quran as divinely inspired by some being, we should not be afraid to identify the being. If we say from the outset that there was no supernatural being speaking to Muhammad or at least giving him the inspiration to say what he was quoted as saying, we would have no choice than to dismiss the whole bunch of the Quran as a fraud and regard Muhammad as one of the most successful liars and deceivers the world has ever see . But that is not the case because throughout the pages of the Quran, Allah is quoted exhaustively as one speaking, even in the first person plural, signifying a dignified or honorific personality or deity.
So, we take a stand: that there was an Allah talking to or inspiring Muhammad. The issue we face here, then, is whether or not the Allah from whose angel Muhammad was receiving his messages is the same Jehovah of the Bible.
We cannot impose an opinion. There are sufficient facts in this book for a sincere reader to determine his or her own conclusion. But it is important for the Muslim reader to be very honest with himself and read the book through because this is a serious matter that has an eternal consequence for his soul. This is the greatest question you will find an answer to...
TILL NEXT WEEK SUNDAY, GOD BLESS YOU ALL AS YOU PATIENTLY READ THIS THREAD...
https://www.nairaland.com/2934119/allah-forward-preface/1#42961274 Well done, God bless you. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Who Killed Mohammed: A Jewish Woman Or Aisha by truthmans2012: 1:36pm On Feb 21, 2016 |
Annunaki: @true2god thanx for this very enlightening post. It clearly explains the controversy behind mohamed's death and any unbiased mind with common sense will realise that the Shia side of the story is the one most likely to be true as there are a lot of loop holes in aisha's account of the story.
CC: Truthman2012 this should interest you. Yes, am keenly interested. Following !! |
Christianity Etc › Re: Who Killed Mohammed: A Jewish Woman Or Aisha by truthmans2012: 1:33pm On Feb 21, 2016 |
true2god: @ truthman2012, long time. It is difficult to trust the narrations of Aisha completely. If all is well, there is no way Aisha and Fatimah will became mortal enemies as soon as Mohammed died. Note that Fatimah did not believe the narrations of Aisha concerning the cause of the death of her father.
If you consider the greatest benefactors of Mohammed's death, it was not his direct bloodlines but his in-laws. So you join the pieces together, you will get what I'm talking about. Recall that Mohammad did not hand over the mantle of leadership to anyone before he died, Abu Bakr did not even consult Fatima before he declared himself a khalifa. Contrary to the quran saying Muhammad is a mercy to the world, he was indeed a curse as he brought confusion, calamities and wars during and after his lifetime. Back to the OP, I want to believe Muhammad died of poison because the evidences are overwhelming from other narrators except Aisha bribed them to say so. Narrated Anas bin Malik: A Jewess brought a poisoned (cooked) sheep for the Prophet who ate from it. She was brought to the Prophet and he was asked, "Shall we kill her?" He said, "No." I continued to see the effect of the poison on the palate of the mouth of Allah's Apostle. (Sahih al-Bukhari, Volume 3, Book 47, Number 786) That was the narration by ANAS bin MALIK who claimed the effect of the poison could be seen on Muhammad's mouth. Let's consider this also: He asked that Al-Hasan and Al-Husain be brought to him. He kissed them and recommended that they be looked after. He asked to see his wives. They were brought to him. He preached them and told them to remember Allâh. PAIN GREW SO MUCH SEVERE THAT THE TRACE OF POISON HE HAD AT KHAIBAR CAME TO LIGHT. It was so sore that he said to ‘Aishah: " I STILL FEEL THE PAINFUL EFFECT OF THE FOOD I TASTED AT KHAIBAR. I FEEL DEATH IS APPROCHING." [ibid 2/637]. That narration is from Muhammad's autobiographer. Here, we are told all the wives were present when Muhammad said he was feeling the effect of the poison as a result of which death was approaching. He died shortly after that event. I think and unless Aisha gave Muhammad a fresh poison unknown to Muhammad himself and still thought it was the poison he ate at Khaibar, there is every reason to believe he died of the poison from the Jewish woman. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Who Killed Mohammed: A Jewish Woman Or Aisha by truthmans2012: 8:00pm On Feb 20, 2016 |
crusadistic: the shias are hardly considered Muslims.They are known for creating false stories to vilify His(SAW) wives and companions.that of Aisha(RA) poisoning Him is baseless.I can't tell if this is what majority of them believe thou.As for him dying as a result of the jewish woman's poison; there is no reason to believe this as He(SAW) died four years later and He(SAW) was healthy through that period,unless it was Allah's wish to make him(SAW) die a matyr through some miracle. One of the hadiths up there states Muhammad ate the poison but didn't swallow it. It is possible it had the effect of slow poison as he didn't actually swallow it. That made it possible for him to live up to four after the poison. Slow poison doesn't kill instantly. |
Islam › Re: Questions Muslims Could Not Answer: Daunting Challenge For All Muslims by truthmans2012: 10:52am On Feb 17, 2016 |
. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Question For Christians by truthmans2012: 10:37am On Feb 17, 2016 |
DeathStroke007: Behold, I Paul say unto you, that if you be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing.
gal.5:2 You dabbled into a subject you have no knowledge of. Abraham was commanded by God to circumsise and also for his son. The Jews believed because they were circumsised being Abraham descendant, they are automatically qualified for salvation. Paul was telling them circumcision is not enough qualification for salvation. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Who Is This Allah? (forward And Preface) by truthmans2012: 10:15am On Feb 17, 2016 |
AlMuflihah: Finally someone with brain. Thank you for the interpretation of the yoruba proverb, now be sincere with yourself did your English translation convey the same in depth meaning as the real proverb in yoruba and the same wordings. And besides I never said somebody cannot understand Arabic perfectly, I only asserted that before you rely 100% on some other person's interpretation of Arabic texts, you must first research into the verses in its original Arabic, because the person who translated it might have committed a blunder in his interpretation( a case study is the different contradictory versions of the English translation of the bible that exists) hence before you could feel capable of even saying anything on the Qur'an and hadith, you MUST learn the language and be open minded for you might be mistaken of choices of words sometimes. For instance imagine your Moshay quoting verse 168 in a chapter with 71 verses imagine display of immense ignorance. Finally on Al-Baghdadiy of ISIL, I will only touch on him a little as his delusions are not what this thread is about, you could open a thread on him and you would see what Muslim Scholars say on him. But as a point of benefit, he understands the sacred texts but chose to follow his desires on their meanings just like the Ignorant Moshay lied about knowing what he never researched. When you read a language other than your native one, you must understand the interpretation perfectly otherwise it will make no meaning to you. Since you said you were not saying that Arabic language cannot be perfectly understood, then what is the basis for the argument? [Quran 11:1 Yusufali] A. L. R. (This is) a Book, with verses basic or fundamental (OF ESTABLISHED MEANING), further EXPLAINED IN DETAIL ,- from One Who is Wise and Well-acquainted (with all things): If the words in capital are true, it gives the impression that the quran should be simple to understand. I wonder why muslims still claim Arabic has a special way of knowing the true meaning. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Who Is This Allah? (forward And Preface) by truthmans2012: 10:15am On Feb 16, 2016 |
AlMuflihah: Thank God that at least you attempted to learn a foreign language. If you are sincere with yourself and not as much of a liar as G.J.O Moshay you will understand how difficult and easily misinterpreted some words get and how many parables loss meanings when translated to another language. And besides ask any linguist he will tell u how deficient the English language is in interpreting Arabic, just like trying to use English to interprete Hausa, I bet you will most likely lose all the beauty of the Language. And note eastern languages are different from western languages in quality and sweetness, I say this because I learnt both. So before you start quoting verses distorted to English by someone who is looking for misguidance or someone still learning Arabic, go first and learn the language then you can talk about the verse. Before then just keep mute because those English translations just make you guys look like ignorant rain-drenched he-goats.
And please help me translate this yoruba proverb to English without distorting the original meaning and words... 'omo osan lon ko ponpo ba iya e'...
Go back and learn Arabic and feel the beauty of eloquence not found in any other language... It is the fruits of an orange tree that make people stone it. It is totally unacceptable for muslims to hide under the lie that you cannot understand Arabic perfectly. Why should God choose a language not perfectly understandable by people to worship Him? To create confusion? I learnt the leader of ISIL has a PhD in islamic studies and yet leading a terrorist group. He must have researched and discovered the in-and-out of islam. Doesn't he understand Arabic as well? |
Islam › Re: Why Did Allah Save Jesus From Death But Allowed Muhammad To Eat Poison? by truthmans2012: 8:19am On Feb 16, 2016 |
hammedah001: You are a stupid fool, where in the quran was it stated that the Muhammed was poised Terrorist!!! What killed Muhammad and where is it written ? |
Islam › Re: Why Did Allah Save Jesus From Death But Allowed Muhammad To Eat Poison? by truthmans2012: 8:32pm On Feb 14, 2016 |
truthman2012: You are right bro.
To be good muslims, allahh must have tampered with their brains. This was exactly what happened to Muhammad:
Quran 87:6-7] By degrees shall We teach thee to declare (the Message), so thou shalt not forget, EXCEPT as Allah wills: For He knoweth what is manifest.
Muhammad's memory was constantly being tampered with to forget what had already been revealed to him. Why? What was wrong with the revelations he was made to forget? It shows the quran is spiritual manipulations. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Bible Versions Are Better Than Qur'anic Translations by truthmans2012(op): 6:40pm On Feb 14, 2016 |
ayodeji481: Find the true meaning of your religion before you study another one. Is that your defence? Your people always make noise that the quran doesn't have versions like the Bible, whereas Quranic translation is worse. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Bible Versions Are Better Than Qur'anic Translations by truthmans2012(op): 5:57pm On Feb 14, 2016 |
annunaki2: The quoran is not only full of contradictions, the translators (like their deceptive allaah) also twisted meanings of words in their various translations to water down the evil nature of the quoran to deceive kaffirs into believing islam is a religion that can be tolerated. Right. Muslims as usual have not been able to say anything. They hide under ignoring a thread when they are speechless. |
Islam › Re: Why Muslims Are So Sexually Active by truthmans2012: 5:48pm On Feb 14, 2016 |
nasiayam: Still hate preaching hate -1 for giving non radicalized Christians a bad name Nonsense !!! Your god and your 'prophet' preached hate, are you better than them? Face your religion and your fellow muslims who are killing here and there. |
Islam › Re: Why Muslims Are So Sexually Active by truthmans2012: 5:32pm On Feb 14, 2016 |
nasiayam: Still preaching hate not love -2 And you didn't see Quran/Muhammad do more than hate? You didn't see how he hated the Jews and Christians and killing them. What deserves to be much more hated than islam and allaah who hate non-muslims. |
Christianity Etc › Bible Versions Are Better Than Qur'anic Translations by truthmans2012(op): 4:53pm On Feb 14, 2016*. Modified: 7:05pm On Jul 12, 2016 |
One of the flimsy reasons muslims attack the Bible is the many versions it has. All Bible versions are saying the same thing in diverse statements. The original message remains intact.
The same cannot be said for the quran. Different translators are giving different meanings to the same Arabic text and so when you quote quranic verses to support your points, muslims would jump out to quote another translation that says something totally different on the same verse as if it is not from the same quran.
The quran is already full of contradictions as allah kept replacing his revelations with what he called better ones, as if he was making mistakes earlier (Quran 2;106). The quranic translators do not help matters as they are just interpreting the arabic text to mean what they want it to mean.
Examples 1.
Quran 2:106 Shakir] Whatever communications We abrogate or cause to be forgotten, We bring one better than it or like it. Do you not know that Allah has power over all things?
[Quran 2:106 Yusufali] None of Our revelations do We abrogate or cause to be forgotten, but We substitute something better or similar: Knowest thou not that Allah Hath power over all things?
Firstly, allahh was replacing or substituting revelations, making the whole quran a total contradiction. Again, Shakir translation says ''Whatever revelation (communications) We ABROGATE OR CAUSE TO BE FORGOTTEN..... This is admitting that allah did abrogate and cause some revelations to be forgotten. While Yusufali translation denies that allah did abrogate and cause to be forgotten. It says ''none of our revelation do we abrogate or cause to be forgotten.
Example 2.
[Quran 48:2 Shakir] That Allah may forgive your COMMUNITY their past faults and those to follow and complete His favor to you and keep you on a right way,
[Quran 48:2 Yusufali] That Allah may forgive THEE thy faults of the past and those to follow; fulfil His favour to thee; and guide thee on the Straight Way;
Shakir translation says allah was to forgive COMMUNITY their faults while Yusuali says no, Allah was to forgive Muhammad's own fault.
Example 3.
[Quran 2:158 Shakir] Surely the Safa and the Marwa are among the signs appointed by Allah; so whoever makes a pilgrimage to the House or pays a visit (to it), there is no blame on him if he goes round them both; and whoever does good spontaneously, then surely Allah is Grateful, Knowing.
[Quran 2:158 Pickthal] Lo! (the mountains) As-Safa and Al-Marwah are among the indications of Allah. It is therefore no sin for him who is on pilgrimage to the House (of Allah) or visiteth it, to go around them (AS THE PAGAN CUSTOM IS). And he who doeth good of his own accord, (for him) lo! Allah is Responsive, Aware.
Shakir translation omitted ''AS THE PAGAN CUSTOM IS''
I will post more as soon as I get them. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Is There Any Proof The Bible Hasn't Been Corrupted ? by truthmans2012: 1:36pm On Feb 14, 2016 |
nasiayam: -2 spreading and preaching hate , not cool. Where did you learn this. You give non militant christians a bad name You are a hypocrite. Your sister said the OP should not refer to Christians as brothers. You didn't see anything wrong with that.That is not hate preaching to you. Smh !!! I learnt it here: Quran 48:29] Muhammad is the messenger of Allah. And those with him are HARD against the disbelievers and merciful among themselves. Islam is full of hate messages, but you didn't see them Many verses of the quran says allaah hates unbelievers. |
Christianity Etc › Re: Is There Any Proof The Bible Hasn't Been Corrupted ? by truthmans2012: 12:46pm On Feb 14, 2016 |
AlMuflihah: ..... @ meixili... Assalam alayka bro, it's not befitting for someone who believes in Allah and the last day to refer to someone who desecrate Allah and his signs as brother, worse still wish him peace. I know you a Muslim with sincerity at heart, but it's very prohibited in Islam. barakallahu fika We know muslims like their allaah hate non-muslims. It hurts real muslims to refer to islam disbelievers as brothers. allahh is not the God of all humanity, it is an idol for only muslims. |
Islam › Re: Why Muslims Are So Sexually Active by truthmans2012: 12:35pm On Feb 14, 2016 |
carinmom: But its in your religious book nau, or am i lying  Which book? |
Islam › Re: Can Prophet Come From Arabia? The Bible Speaks by truthmans2012(op): 11:51am On Feb 14, 2016 |
[quote author=truthmans2012 post=42891211][/quote]. |
Islam › Re: Islam Is For The Arabs, It Is Not A Universal Religion by truthmans2012(op): 11:48am On Feb 14, 2016 |
crusadistic: I say you and your likers are really daft humans. So, that abuse is your defence? I am yet to find a muslim who reasons well. Smh!!! |
Islam › Re: Why Muslims Are So Sexually Active by truthmans2012: 7:53am On Feb 14, 2016 |
Bakrabas: What about that picture truthman2012 Are those people muslims? Look at the porn you posted !!! |