seunayantokun:


Far be it from me to prevent anyone from enjoying their life, but we should all note that with every right comes accountability. When we say life is evolving, it is actually devolving as confirmed by natural, medical, and social sciences. Every immoral action or inaction brings undesirable consequences, and responsibility must be laid on someone behind it. At the end of what seems an endless circling comes judgement of our moral or immoral actions and inactions by God Who we are responsible to. No choice about this, it is bound to happen. You know truth is bitter.

Lol...

Tell me.....i guess you've been through this particular system/routine a couple of times for you to tell me what it is and how it MUST going to be with such certainty.
Well that should be your to own advantage and concern the rest of the world who do not share such believe would be OK with it.

In this world Everything is subjective and objective but what we forget most times is everything is relative.... Including what you term undesirable and desirable.

We must as individual find our space and keep to it. If we must exceed it we should do well to exceed that space to like ones or spaces which would in some way accept our views... Otherwise it would be considered as intruding another man's living space (something like rape) and if we allow that then we should allow rape.

Live by your standards and let other live by theirs.. Live by your moral or religional beliefs and let others... And if some direct actions from another violates your space you could now decide how to handle it... That's balance and justice... Thank you

seunayantokun:


DNA test is not an escape from sexual morality responsibility, you need that, please. If everyone were sexually dishonest, you as an individual might not be a happy man. We shouldn't be selfish. Imagine you were a product of such things and it was never revealed to you until a critical point in your life. Imagine children milling around your neighbourhood were in such situation. Imagine your children found themselves among such products and would likely marry from them. Imagine the whole world depending on tests to sort out parentage. Imagine unresolvable inherited health problems and undesirable value patterns. Imagine...ad infinitum. The world wouldn't be a nice place to be anymore. You see, the reason why wicked people 'enjoy' their acts is that other humans have chosen to be different. You don't harm God by your immoral pleasure lifestyle but yourself and fellow humans. The end is permanent regret in time and eternity. The value you place on DNA test can never replace our Manufacturer's recommendation i.e. virtue.
And if you care to know, God will judge you and me by Jesus Christ based on our moral actions and inactions. You can say whatever you want now but you cannot escape your judgement day before your Maker. Thank you so much.

OK man.
Now you can't decide for everyone how they should live... What you can do is live and let live.
Sexual immorality is a term coined by man. What is truly required of man is to live as man and if man chose to have sex this way while another chose have sex the other way then so be it...
Everything has its advantages and disadvantages. Especially those systems (i.e sexual morality classifications) created by man. Like it or not the world must evolve in circle. What was will be, what is will pass and so on. And sometimes there will beautiful moments that they exists together. I will advice you to enjoy the time and let others live when it concerns their private live such as sex (rape not included).

iCauseTrouble:
It's only jobless men that would want their dick to be up for more than 10 minutes.....
I do everything I want to do within 10 minutes and focus on my life and business

Pornstars, male strippers and other sexual related jobs nko...


Oga live your life and stop pointed fingers wrongly... For your mind you better pass people wey dey enjoy sex for a long time... While they are living life to the fullest on the other hand

seunayantokun:

That is why this your problem will continue. Don't worry, if you fail to understand that lack of that sexual morality birthed the problem being discussed, you will see more results to come.

That's cool... That's why there's perternity test, case solved... Better for everyone now you can keep the sexual morality preaching to yourself.

seunayantokun:

Men have problems ó. Why do you sleep with a woman who is not validly married to you?

They are talking about lying about who the father of a child is......

Give to the father of the child his child period....

Attend to the issue at hand and keep your sexual morals to yourself. Fornication no be crime, adultery no be crime, paternity fraud is.

What this have to do with validity of marriage?
Na only married people dey born?
Na all married men dey sleep outside?

Rtk4:
my brother, i swear everything dey house in very large quantities. We are here in the north so those perishables are so cheap. If you buy #100 tomato here you go shock, if you buy #50 pepper here, you can't use everything except you be real Yoruba man wey like pepper. She's just being what i can't explain. Anyday she's cooking soup, I do give her up to 1k.

Since people would not see where you wrote "everything is at home and I give her pocket money and also get her everything she want as long as I can afford". If truly everything need for cooking is available in abundance and you give her sufficient pocket money at set times then maybe you should take the advice below.

If the pocket money is big, reduce it and add to the daily #500 maybe she would prefer that.

It is not bad to have plenty to spend and also actually spend plenty but it is equally as important to set management strategies to funds too..

If only Nigerian government would follow your structure in a way.

You know Nigerians are the artitech of thier present government and they scream no "proper management of funds.."

Being a simp does not necessarily have to do with what you do or do not for/with a woman. It is more of what you do or do not accept irrespective of the sex-type initiating such event. Simping for an alpha is quite a bigger simp than simping for a woman cause he as got no hole except for his ass and mouth and I don't think a wanting to be alpha would want that kind of holes from another fellow male. Unless he(the alpha) has got other businesses apart from male to male sex that would make you up into what you want to be, but unfortunately the alpha system too have now been compromised and most alphas now using it as much as clerics use religion or as politicians use democratic government to lure and exploit the gullible. So what this means is that you don't become a sheeple to another alpha just because you want to be an alpha yourself. that is just what it is, a "zombie alpha or simping alpha". You've got to get a mind of your own and make decisions for yourself. Yes, I know these women could be very annoying and irrational but it shouldn't make you become like them following a pattern that drives their brains even when the pattern is totally illogical. It should be an opportunity for you to take advantage of the situation and be original and unique. How does that happen?
Observe the truth about the reality of every single event and take the accurate actions for any of such events, instead of following one made up alpha rule at all time. Like Bleep! What does that make you? It makes you a simp+. An alpha has rules but the freedom to implement these rules on events remains with an alpha and the power to break and remake any rule an alpha abides to also should remain with an alpha otherwise that alpha is a simp.. (this is why sigma males should be the alphas) "Note I am only using these terms 'simp' , 'alpha' , 'sigma' just for formal clarity not because they matter. The personality of any individual shouldn't be classified into such stereotype groups".

In all, what I am actually saying to you is; You shouldn't let the emotional drive to fvck women lure you into becoming a frustrated simp under one self acclaimed alpha. You should be in charge. If you aren't in charge then it means women aren't your problem your problem is you not being able to handle realilty concerning living and dying. The moment you can come to terms with what reality is and what you want from it, then the way to what you want from it will start unveiling itself to you.


This writeup is a general topic on how to become an alpha(in charge) and so it is not about beefing women but it could help you to control of a lot of women if you could really see through it.

Thumbs up

Wickedfacts:


Truth is bitter

So bitter you are ashamed of your moniker.

What's your story?

Fishy thread...
No wonder its on frontpage

Reelmii:
i know because i have seen these happen. many times....i know anyone can start a violence and that violence is not prone to one gender....but let us not put the blame only on the women as if men are saints....its unfortunate that the man died and we cant hear his own side of the story.... and that is why the woman is seen as the devil...

I am of the opinion that wen violence sets in a relationship or marriage,,, both parties to go their separate ways.....both men and women endure alot in marriage but violence should not be tolerated or endured....have a nice weekend

Self defence from minor bruises?
It could be..(what happened to the law?, no police station in bauchi?)
What if the bruises occurred after the stab?

And please stop that lies about "she must have been abused"

If women are not cautioned ... Years to come homicide by women would increase drastically surpassing those men commit... Women kill out of emotions not even physical attack on them.. They kill their own fellow women who they jealous talk more of a man who probably only cheated.

Be careful how you support a murderer in a murder case and stay away from gender sentiments.

We all are only humans....
No one is entirely perfect...
If they are true to themselves they will find a way through, either together or apart... As long as they can peacefully continue life's journey.

God guide us all....

Fishy thread

Nice innovation

Help comes to those who help themselves...

I have giving up on simps until they unsimp

flyca:
Yes, she has set her standards.
She likes what she likes.
If you cannot afford her, leave her!
Someone else can!


Response to the the mentions...
See eh.... let's stop arguing people's preferences.
She will eventually meet someone that likes her for who she is and will give her high grade stuff without her even asking.


Guys still quoting me:
Why are you threatening ladies with marriage? Because she wants Channel bag? There are many high class, high demand ladies in good marriages. As a man, please just go for what you can afford. Someone will still love and appreciate you and your 2k!

The problem isn't the amount of money or the class... It's the insolence, the non appreciation to a good gesture...

The richest of people in the world.
The highest of classes...
They know how to appreciate the smallest of things (not just saying thank you but also by literally taking something that is almost nothing and making it like gold) ...
That's why they are on top.

IyaebeTheGreat:
The husband must have caused all these wahala and it affected the woman mentally

Or the woman assinated the innocent husband just as she was gon do to her own children...

All I see on this thread is high level of hypocrisy coming from people that are worse.

Tallesty1:
My problem is that Less that is telling her gender not to settle for less.

You wey dey beg for food no be less nah person wey no gree buy am be less.



In all, the request doesn't warrant such reply. looks like dude has been looking for an excuse to rant

Lol

MrBrownJay1:


wait...out of all countries, Irak is the one you decided to pick?!?!?! ok lets do it...

Irak possess some of the biggest oil fields in the world and the US gov wanted to control it so they KNOWINGLY LIED about weapon of mass destruction in Irak.. and even when the UN clearly stated that invaded Irak was wrong and that it WAS 100% ILLEGAL, the US went ahead amd illegally invaded Iraq in 2003, murder Saddam Hussein and stole the country's natural ressources (aka oil). it is well known that Bush and Blair are the main culprit in this pre emptive strike madness. COME ON!!!!

there was NO REASON; NO LEGALITY for the US to invade Irak in 2003... and even when the UN said there was no reason for US to invade Irak, they still went ahead and did so. even the United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan said in September 2004 that: "From our point of view and the UN Charter point of view, the invasion of irak in 2003 by the US was illegal." but yet, nobody came to the Iraqi people rescue, like they do now in Ukraine.

The invasion of Ukraine by Russia today is exactly the same as the invasion of Irak by the US in 2003, duh!!!!

but hey, dont take my word for it...


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQyN4X0sFdA

Been a while bro....
We've got to end this once and for all and move ahead, maybe start another argument on another topic on another thread. So, I had to pick iraq.
Now see the reason I picked Iraq.
(win you over and punch you a knock out)

I believe you know very well the story between Bush and Saddam. (so I will try to leave out factual quotes due the length of this reply)

1.Bush played a political game wrongly to incriminate Saddam and attack on that bases.

2.The UN and most of Europe were not with him on this, in fact they later concluded that his claims about Saddam hosting alqaeda and also building a nuclear weapon has no substantial proofs and so would probably be considered not true.

And they later condemned the actions of Bush to a point where it would have been considered criminal. But yet it wasn't certain what was and what was not (up until this day it is unsure if Saddam had terrorist as allies or not. In fact it could be said that he did and I will proof that here). Read on.

3.The US was cautioned and the attack stopped (even while the second phase was still getting read. Note this)

4. Colin Powell the secretary of state (US) who presented the invasion speech on behalf of Bush, later condemned Bush administration and said he was falsely influenced by incorrect information to make that speech and cleared himself off the connections with Bush.

5.Citizens of United state fought against Bush and sincerely condemn his actions.

( Note that the UN was unsure if or not the accusations were true before the invasion )
See below:

*In 2002 "All 15 members of the Security Council agreed to give Iraq a final opportunity to comply with its obligations and disarm or face the serious consequences of failing to disarm"
*It was somehow later established that Iraq could infarct be connected with terrorism as the US state army had to return to Iraq in 2014 to battle the insurgence between.
* "The War in Iraq was an armed conflict between Iraq and its allies and the Islamic State (also known as ISIS or ISIL) which began in 2013 and ended in December 2017."

Now we have successfully proven that to attack a country without haven first establishing a legal criteria of the illegality of such country is criminal and condemnable.

Then it could be seen that no one was with Bush after it was clear that his accusations had no substantial proof (even though it could not be totally debunked as a lie) .T the citizens of the US and it's high ranked officials were yet against him.

So here we see that not even the US would be spared if an illegal invasion was to be taken by them.

For Russia it is very clear that the attack on Ukraine is totally out of its delusional insecurity and a dose of inferiority complex built by its constant comparison to Nato's influential status on its neighbours. Now instead of playing the game right and upping their game just as nato and the US as in recent times done. They decide to go for the criminal way and base their condemnable act on the criminal slogan "The United States have done this before". The United state didn't do it without condemnation. And if accusations against Iraq were fully cleared as not true before the invasion. The US wouldn't have been allowed to attack in the first place.

I am sure you know China is seeking out a way for a peace dialogue for Russia on its current attack on Ukraine. They know Russia's game plan is stale and won't hold for long before the world starts throwing stones at them (Russia)

Happy Easter Sunday

MrBrownJay1:


today is your lucky day
where do you want me to start...?! choose any ONE of the country that i mentionned and i will expose the US involvement with gov opposition forces to destabilize the gov in place and/or invasion of that said country (when it didnt work).

Cool!
I already know what you're going write about Libya and we both know our stands on that.. So I will randomly pick another but I am sure we might just end up on same note as Libya. Anyways let's do it just for doing sake.

I pick iraq
Come on bro let's get it on!

MrBrownJay1:


you must be a novice... the US dictates to the whole world what they want them to do, and when you dont follow, they train/arm gov opposition forces and/or militias to destabilize the gov...and when that doesnt work, they physically invade the country... like they did in Libya, Irak, Iran, Syria, Afghanistan, Cuba, Panama, Chad, Nicaragua, Congo, Egypt, Guatemala, Indonesia, dominican republic, Yugoslavia, Haiti, Vietnam, Chile, Bolivia, Ethiopia, Angola etc... just like Russia did in Ukraine!

abeg educate yourself!

Show me where they did without a tangible reason...(after colonial and slave era)... They dictate, threatened and attacked without any provocation and/or illegal actions?
Show me bro

You should educated yourself rather

MrBrownJay1:


a civil war started in Ukraine in 2014 (just like the civil war that started in Libya), Russia decides to support anti gov forces (just like the US did in Libya), afterwards Russia invaded Ukraine (just like the US did in Libya)... HOW DIFFICULT IS IT TO UNDERSTAND?!?

again, you either stand by what the US/RUSSIA does around the world, or you dont, but STOP BEING A HYPOCRITE here!

No bro it is not hard to understand and I am certainly not being hypocritical.

The US didn't dictate to libyans before any Libyan protest and civil war, neither did they invade Libya before any form of violence was established. If they had hands in inciting any violence in Libya in was mostly silent if not invisible and it was non violent . in all attacks on Libya, the US only took advantage of terrorist attacks and war events by Libyans.

And that is not what Russia have done in Ukraine both in 2014 and 2022.....
Russia dictated, then threatened before any form of violence was established, then attacked (in the current war against Ukraine, Russia did all 3 before any form of violence from Ukraine was established . That strategy is failing them.
Russia should up their game.

MrBrownJay1:


so you dont even know that the current war in Ukraine STARTED AS A CIVIL WAR BACK IN 2014 and culminated into the invasion of Russia in 2022 (and yet you wanna discuss this issue)?!?!? so you dont know about the DONBAS war which started in 2014 til today? how can Russia annex the Ukraine region of CRIMEA if there was no war in Ukraine all these years?! you people dont know anything and just come to NL writing yeye nonsense!

you people didnt even know that there was a war in Ukraine all these years because you didnt care about Ukraine. the war was happening in Ukraine and Russia was supporting the militia ever since (like the US supported the militias in Libya)... and after 8yrs of war in Ukraine, Russia decided to invade Ukraine (just like the US did in LIbya after supporting the militias for years)

abeg EDUCATE YORUSELF SO I DONT HAVE TO DO IT FOR YOU!!!!

LOL... You further support the fact that Russia is attacking a nation that wasn't under war. I THINK YOU SHOULD EDUCATE YOURSELF, CAUSE I WON'T DO IT FOR YOU AFTER THIS ONE TIME

What happened in 2014?
Going into details will only consume our precious time bro.

In summary
Russia pressured Ukraine not to sign a trade treaty with EU and it resulted into a protest which resulted into a war... Yet again in all scenerio Russia wants to control unkranian economy but their method of violence is not working.
Same thing happening in the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine was what happened in 2014.. Russia dictating to Ukraine who to trade with in 2014, Russia dictating to Ukraine who to ally military force with in 2022. If you ask me the 2014 invation by Russia was more unprovoked than the current one.

There was a sudden change of decision by Yanukovyh

"In November 2013, a wave of large-scale protests (known as Euromaidan) began in response to President Yanukovych's sudden decision not to sign a political association and free trade agreement with the European Union (EU), instead choosing closer ties to Russia."

And it was as a result of pressure from outside force "Russia". Probably threats mostly consisting violence.

"Earlier that year, the Verkhovna Rada (Ukrainian parliament) had overwhelmingly approved finalizing the agreement with the EU.[26] Russia had put pressure on Ukraine to reject it."

Ukrainians knew what was going on and then this:
"The scope of the protests widened, with calls for the resignation of Yanukovych and the Azarov government.[28] Protesters opposed what they saw as widespread government corruption"


And then this
"following Ukraine's Revolution of Dignity, anti-revolution and pro-Russian protests began in Ukraine's Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts,"


Then this

"Russia occupied and then annexed Crimea,[38][39] while armed pro-Russian separatists seized government buildings and proclaimed the independent states of Donetsk and Luhansk, sparking the Donbas war."

It was all planned by Russian government .. If they want Ukraine they should up their game... That's all it needs. And it has to be a non violent method otherwise they will lose a lot of neighbouring countries to the US. Which by the way is already happening.

MrBrownJay1:


bro, there was a civil war in Ukraine from 2014 right after the MAIDAN UPRISING (which started in the Donbas region) WAAAAAAAY before Russia decided to get involved....
EDUCATE YOURSELF ON THE ISSUE SO I DONT HAVE TO DO IT FOR YOU!

again, stop being a hypocrite and pretend that what Russia is doing is any different to what the US has been doing all over the world for decades.

2014 ... Lol, why should I educate myself on dates/events that doesn't relate with the matter on ground? You said it yourself that happened way before Russia's attack which couldn't no longer needed. It does not have anything whatever to do with Russian invention does it?

See difference between dates sincerity eludes your opinions on this issue.

On 24 February 2022, Russia invaded and occupied parts of Ukraine... Ukraine isn't in any form of chaos as at the time.


Russia is actually attacking a country not under war nor involved in terrorism. A country that have in no way provoke the attack.
That is different from THE SMART TACTICS OF THE US and Russia won't have their way unless they come up with a non violent political approach.

Have a fun with your next reply.. It wouldn't matter. It's clear we have both chosen a stand each.

MrBrownJay1:



... now if you think what the US did in Libya was right then stop being a HYPOCRITE and accept that what Russia is doing is perfectly right!
lets not be hypocrites here!!!!

OK bro, I will let this rest. I let you have your opinion on the matter not because it is true but because it is your opinion.

But one little emphasy again before I let it go:

Every country the US have invaded in recent years have been because of a reason that relates to known violence going on in the country either as a civil war or as terrorism and this violence must have in a way impose Thier attacks on US soil or on it citizens. But in the case of Russia against Ukraine. The attacks is basically rooted on an unfounded assumption that "Ukraine is allying with an enemy" when it is in fact doing something right by finding military might to PROTECT its country and citizens. Not because it wants to launch unprovoked attacks against other countries. Ukraine have perhaps rightly percieve the sincere traits of NATO not attacking countries by mere assumptions of terrorism nor do Thier military invade countries wo are not under war at the time as opposed to what Russia is doing against Ukraine. And have picked allies with them (the US) for military PROCTECTION AND STRENGTH as opposed to terrorism or unprovoked violent attacks on others.

These are facts not hypocrisy! Bro.

MrBrownJay1:


so did North korea, yet i dont see the US going anywhere near that country...stop the hypocrisy!

Over the years there have been invasion in NK by United States during war between NK and SK.

It is just that North Korea have never claimed any unprovoked attack on any foreign country other than South Korea. So the case of Libya is different

I am just being factual and not hypocritic bro.

"In 1950, a North Korean invasion began the Korean War, which saw extensive U.S.-led U.N. intervention in support of the South, while the North received support from China and from the Soviet Union. Some 1,780,000 Americans served in the war, with 36,574 killed, 103,284 wounded, and 4,714 taken as prisoners of war."

MrBrownJay1:

so these foreign countries decided that they will INVADE LIBYA in order to help a civil war and oust the gov in place, yet you believe that when Russia is now doing the exact same thing in Ukraine, it is wrong, abi?!

That's the problem right here, the difference!
Was unkraine war infested before Russian invasion?
Why does Russia wants to assume control over unkraine?
Being a part of Nato is a legal (Nato is not a terrorist organisation) and Ukraine is a sovereign state.

After all China and Russia were able to fight along side with North Korea against South Korea, the United States and Co. (both countries "NK" and "SK" had allies behind each, that is to say a country should have the right to choose Thier alliances with other countries for protective reasons especially when there isn't a war going on at the time).

Russia starts an unprovoked war (went violent) following thier inability to become influential enough to be seen as a worthy ally by ukraine. And that shows traits of psychological inferiority.

MrBrownJay1:

yet when other countries do the same military interventions....aka Israel in Palestine and/or Russia in Ukraine, you people will have a complete different biased response, abi?

Again bro, why does Russia wants to intervene in a country that isn't in chaos!?
A country that was never considered by world power body such as the UN (which by the way Russia is part of) as a country under war or threat?
Why!?

I hope it's not true

MrBrownJay1:


FIXED

1.Libya has been marked for terrorism far back..

The Libyan government of Muammar Gaddafi funded terror operations against the United States, most notably the 1986 Berlin discotheque bombing


On 5 April 1986, three people were killed and 229 injured when La Belle discothèque was bombed in the Friedenau district of West Berlin. The entertainment venue was commonly frequented by United States soldiers,and two of the dead and 79 of the injured were Americans.commonly frequented by United States soldiers, and two of the dead and 79 of the injured were Americans.



2.The US took part in military intervention along with other foreign countries as well and didn't want to take over libya nor did they want to conquer it.

When the Libyan civil war broke out in 2011, the United States took part in a military intervention in the conflict, aiding anti-Gaddafi rebels with air strikes against the Libyan Army.

3.Even after these activities.. Lybia proved Thier terrorism traits once again.. And yes US citizens were involved again

Libya–United States relations are the bilateral relations between the State of Libya and the United States of America. Relations are today cordial and cooperative, with particularly strong security cooperation only after the 2012 attack on the US liaison office or mission in Benghazi.

4.And again US violent involvement against libya for the second time was yet part of a military intervention as the first time

The U.S. began operations in Libya again on November 13, 2015 with permission from the GNA, as part of the military intervention against ISIL

Libya was established as a terrorist country far back as 1986 and yes it attacked US citizens... And attacks on libya by the US was never colonial attack but a military intervention on an already WAR INFESTED country (which was by the way established by group of countries around the world)

ThatrealestApex:


A Path-etic Illite-rate who inherited Nairaland from his Father trying so hard to make Front Page with his made-up cock and bull stories

Please how can I block you from seeing your stvpid posts?

I recently noticed.. I suppose dey avoid em thread from now on

I no pray to make me see or experience wetin go make me commit suicide...

From the above then the below..


I refuse to commit suicide because of emotional betrayal from another person (Especially because of woman)

MrBrownJay1:


isnt it what the US did in Irak, Afghanistan, Libya etc and you had no problem with it? why should it suddenly be a problem when Russia does it?
let us not be hypocrites here!

Before the attacks on Ukraine by Russia, There isn't any clear case that Ukraine is a terrorist threat against Russia..i.e No unprovoked bombings by non government groups on Russia, no threat statements, no hate speech, no illegal connections (Nato is legal and not a "by force" thing), no killings of Russian citizens by any known unkrainian terrorists... Nothing at all relating to terrorism against Russia.