sonmvayina: It is a psalm written by David and given to the choir master. " the lord( Hashem ) said to my lord(david) sit thou on my right hand till I make your enemies ( David's enemies, those who sort to kill him) thy foot stool.
Got it now..
And they composed that a music and sung it to worship God. Quite hilarious.
AntiChristian: I have dealt with it before. In fact, it's simple to deal with.
Who is the first Lord? Who is the second Lord?
Let's Check Psalm 110:1 which is the original verse: The LORD (YAHWEH) said to my Lord (ADONI) : “Sit at My right hand until I make Your enemies a footstool for Your feet.”
Hebrew word Yahweh vs Adoni While the first LORD is Yahweh used only for God only and never Jesus or any other human, the second is however adoni which is always used for human masters and lords never God.
Adoni is used humans masters in Ex 21:5, Gen 24: from 12, 1 Sam 13:30. In Gen 18:12 Adoni is used as husband. In 1 Kings 18:7, Adoni is used as a Prophet.
Your argument is David the king was talking to another Isrealite calling him Lord. You are very funny. If you say I don't believe in Bible, I understand but if you want to prove your point based on Biblical truth, brother, stop chasing shadows.
blamingthedevil: :oPutin made a big mistake. It is not who started the war that matters. Ukraine people will fight back
Honestly it was a bad move by him. I thought he was smarter. Nothing is wrong with taking a political position he took but the best bet to go about it is by way of diplomacy. He would end up weakning Russia more. The guorilla reaction would be more devastating than all out war. He did learn from chechynya event. America has learnt their lessons.
AntiChristian: The words of Jesus are clear from what he never said.
For example, Jesus said Eli Eli lema Sabacthani which means "My God, My God why have you forsaken me?
Jesus had a God!
Mark 12:36 For David himself said by the Holy Ghost, The Lord said to my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand, till I make thine enemies thy footstool. Two Lords deal with it
AntiChristian: Where was Jesus speaking this words himself?
I hope you understand your question very well. Every statement credit to Jesus was quoted by a writer. Jesus did not author any book. I hope you understand the Bible.
AntiChristian: It's really hard having a conversation with Christians especially those who believe Jesus as God.
Ask them where Jesus called himself God in an unambiguous way anywhere in the Bible and they start by saying:
Thomas and Peter worshipped him! (Jesus sef worshipped his father in Matthew The wind obeyed him! (miracle) He raised the dead (and not that he turned water to booze in Cana wedding lol) (another Miracle).
But the claim still is that Jesus never called himself God anywhere in the Bible.
Revelation 1:8 I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending, saith the Lord, which is, and which was, and which is to come, the Almighty.
[quote author=canada2022 post=110185192]Please I need explanation to this part of our father prayer Jesus taught us in the gospel.
"and lead us not into temptation but deliver us from evil"
Does God lead his own creation into temptation[/quote/]
James 1:13-14 Let no man say when he is tempted, I am tempted of God: for God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth he any man: But every man is tempted, when he is drawn away of his own lust, and enticed
How do we reconcile the above with Lord's prayer. " Lead us not into temptation" God deals with us with his MERCY, GRACE and FAITHFULNESS . That prayers is asking God to help us overcome our weakness with his Mercy, Grace and FAITHFULNESS. If God doesn't do that we automatically becomes candidate of TEMPTATION. If we fail this temptation we are then liable to judgment. This is the worse situation and that's why Jesus taught us to pray as such. Bible says he who the Father loves, he chastesizes. I hope you get it. We fall into temptation after we failed the help of Father through his Mercy, grace and faithfuness to overcome our weaknesses. Afterwards he has no choice but to let temtpation do the firework. If we again fail then he can't help his judgement. Remember Job in weakness of "fear" Judas on weekness of money, Samson on weakness of strange women etc. Bless you.
Have been a very active guest on nairaland since about last year. Have been reading and going through so many atheist believes here and I somehow find it sensible to me cause each day I go through a lot I pray fast and do many more it just seems as if the thing won't change.
Then I remembered how my mom was a chronic church lover who never misses a church program. If you read my previous post about how my dad is to me you would understand the sorrow she has gone through before she died.
Mainly the post on nairaland that has made me realize that Indeed these prayers dont work was an old post from hardmirror(sorry for the mention sir) I came across It i read everything and realize this man is making sense. Although I still attend church services like normal Christians but my zeal for Christ have gone each time am in church I don't feel like it makes sense to me to come to the church on basis of praying praying and praying which mostly doesn't work.
What is missing in your life is knowledge. 1.This knowledge is that you are here for a purpose. 2. It's your responsibility after knowing Christ that you must ask to know your divine purpose. 3. You must ask God to help you fulfill it. 4. You must take step to fulfill it. This is when you have developed a relationship with God. Everything you do outside this is just a mere religion. Your G.O may not be interested in telling you this because he wants to keep using you to fulfill his own divine purpose. Act now and thank God later. I was a victim of this untill it was revealed to me. Before you start doubting God, ask your self this question, " If there is no God, then there must be no devil"? It is easier to know devil than knowing God. A simple hint to know the devil: Look around you for a comfirmed Yahoo plus guy, tell you want to belong, voila! the devil would reveal himself, no string attached. But if you want God to reveal himself it has procedures. Knowledge, wisdom and power. Then in conclusion, if devil is real then God is real else you and I would have been consumed. I put you in charge of Holy Spirit for deeper understanding.
LordReed: That the Earth is a sphere has been known since antiquity so which scientist was teaching that the Earth is flat?
We are talking of the difference between fact and truth which I said functional doesn't exist while you are point ing to scientific facts as a claim that facts are not essential truths so go ahead and point out scientific facts that were not true. The Earth being flat is not one of them since that assertion has no connection with science.
If those who claim to be god believers or hear from god were infallible I would say you have something but as it turns out they are no more infallible than non-believers or non-hearers.
The fear of god is the beginning of being hoodwinked.
What can't be investigated in laboratory doesn't exist?
LordReed: Huh? What do mean by round versus spherical? Do you mean scientists taught that the earth was a round flat disc?
I don't think you understand how scientific progress works. Take gravity as an example, gravity was thought to be an attraction between bodies but with Einstein's theories it was discovered that gravity is not an attraction but rather it is disturbance in the space time continuum by energy or matter. Those who previously described gravity were not wrong because they described the relationship between masses mathematically correctly but they were not correct in their general description. That did not mean they had a wrong fact, one doesn't call a description a fact. The facts don't change, like the mathematical description of gravity remains accurate even though we have a better understanding of what it is. Nor is instrumental inaccuracy mean facts have changed.
You rely on an untestable and an unreliable method and you have the gall to castigate scientific change? LMAO.
You are mixing subjective judgement with established facts. Judicial systems are not arbiters of truth or else their judgements would be impossible to over turn. They are arbiters of law and how it applies to society. A judge is not an omniscient being and so cannot stay in his chambers and know what the truth of a matter is, what they do is determine how a case presented to them is affected by the law. If you think a judge is an arbiter of truth you are sorely mistaken.
Apology for error in to the use of " round" instead of "flat" Then you said "scientific progress" I hope the idea is not that science has never been wrong! That would be very shocking! Again, you claim judge is not omniscient being, glad to hear that, because it's the same with all human beings. This is why man would perpetually search for the truth which can only be obtained from personal relationship with God. With all the glory of science, it took only tiny Covid 19 to bring the best health institution to its knees. Fear of God is the beginning of wisdom.
Workch: Its okay if you believe it, what's not okay is expecting people to believe you without evidence.
What you desire is the truth. Alas , evidence can't deliver the truth to you. Why? Humans has limitation. Instrument, devices has limitation. Pie 22/7 on a super computer is a mere approximation. Let me ask you how much of the design capacity of your brain can you ever use in your life time? If you rely on evidence man and his instrument can offer you to know the truth, you may be getting ready for unpleasant surprises. What is revealed is for man, what is not, is for God.
LordReed: There is no functional difference between fact and truth.
There is a whole lot sir. The difference is human limitation. Our limitation made us taught Earth was round for centuries. In those period that was scientific fact, but alas the Earth is spherical, that is the "truth" What we celebrate today as scientific fact may become illusion tomorrow. My Bible teaches" trust in the Lord with all your heart, lean not on your own understanding. In my profession, I am used to a lot human and instrument error.
That is why we Christians rely on Holy Spirit for the truth. Even human judicial system relies on judgement which is based on what appears to be event to independent reasonable observer. This is why its not authoritative truth but what is humanly possible to be admitted as truth.
Workch: It's simple, If I claim that I can fly, for you to believe it, I have to fly. I don't ask you to prove that i cannot fly.
If I say that I have a drug that can cure HIV, I don't tell you to prove to me that the drug cannot cure HIV. I get to work to prove it with testable evidence. I would probably get HIV patients to participate in a study. Not just HIV patients but it has to be enough sample size like 100 people. I will test the drug on them repeatedly, if the result is the same everytime or almost everytime I test it then that is evidence that the drug cures HIV. If I test it on 100 patients and only 30 is cured, there's still no statistically significant evidence that the drug can cure HIV because that's just 30%. More research needs to be done in this regard.
If you make a claim that miracles are real, how can we test it and give us repeatable and testable results. Can we go to hospital to test it on large enough sample size and deduce a statistical significant repeatable results? If no, then that claim cannot be said to be a fact.
This is why we don't take anything Christians say seriously, they cannot be tested hence cannot be trusted.
Christians are people who do not see yet believe. They believe something they can't see. This is because they use the sense that is not physical. Nicolas Tesla was in that spirit when he said science would achieve more if they can start studying non physical phenomenon. But if a man certified dead clinically came back life, I am not ashamed to believe his testimony.
LordReed: Evidence are facts that taken together point to an exclusive conclusion. You cannot point at something open ended and claim it is evidence for your god. The facts you present need to point to the exclusive conclusion that a god exists and is the creator of the universe.
On that note I submit that "fact" may not be the "truth" . Do you agree?
Workch: A disbelief in God is because you have refused to provide proof for a belief in God.
The claim is thus: there's God The Op doesn't believe that claim. You have to provide evidence for Op to believe and not tell him to find evidence for you. That's silly
If you made the claim, you find the evidence and not shifting the burden of proof to those who don't believe your claims. Did you even attend any philosophy class in your life?
The proof you ask for are too numerous to mention. I have discussed some of them in my earlier post but if they are not convincing enough to you, I will do more. You and I mean your goodself are a living proof that God is real. No big bang has been able to produce by a random process NOKIA 3310 let alone human homosapiens like you, brilliant enough to engage in intellectual debate on existence of God. Beloved you are fearfully and wonderfully created by Almighty God.
suicidesheep: Your are just stating things, how on earth has AI proved the existence of God, you're just spilling gibberish. Which one is space exploration has also proved the existence of God?
Your username is frightening. AI helped humanity in genome project. We are able to decode DNA this reinforce the concept of grand design as opposed to random natural selection. In space exploration, we are able to confirm many biblical prophecy such as asteroid colliding with the earth. NASA and SpaceX are both working on making man muliplanetry being majorly because of possibilities of asteroid strike. AI prophecy is also present in Rev.13 talk about AI killer robots and global identification system. And many more. I can see the look on your face, but thats the truth.
Workch: The burden of proof lies on someone making the claim and not on the person who doesn't believe his bogus claims.
No one is going to help you find evidence for your fictions, you created the fiction, you provide evidence for it else we won't believe it
That's how it works dude
I am not the OP who "think" there's no God. I have no doubts that's why I don't look around for proofs. But for you and your team you have responsibility because the leader of your team use the word" think" which is not scientific and connotes doubt.
It's your responsibility to do it. Due diligence is your responsibility if you doubt anything. That's the principle of science. Research. If you think anybody's testimony is not convincing enough as a scientist you bust it by conducting a scientific inquiry. For example if someone says he died and came back to life, you can verify that by requesting for their medical records. If they claim they went to heaven, you have lie detector as a machine to verify that. You are a scientist, you should know better now. I am not supposed to be teaching you your job now!
Workch: The topic is how can we test the testimony of the pastor to be true. This is not a biology class. Just provide a way for us to test those testimonies.
g Legal professional use cross examination. You can borrow from it. The technique is cross examination.
KnownUnknown: Unfunny guy, who is fearing the unknown. Someone wrote numbers around a circle and drew lines connecting them and you’re impressed. No need to read about no Rodin Coil and Gerald generator. I guess those are to generate “free energy”. What silly truth?
If you had done your due diligence you would have found this from the same page, which shows that the divine number is 2,4,8 not 3,6,9 and it also has pretty shapes. Einstein.
Oh! Free energy is silly truth. Then fossil fuel energy is the future. I think I know the school of thought you belong now. I guess you must be from oil rich Nigeria region. I conclude no need to continue this conversation. You win, there is no Gid, fossil fue is the future. But before I conlude let me ask this logic question: If there is no God, then there must be no devil. True or fasle?
Funny guy, I have read that before. It was a dry argument from fear of the unknown. Less than a page skeptism should not be enough to convince a bright mind like you. Do your due diligence. Vortex maths has been applied to zero point energy technology and it works. Go read about Rodin coil and Gerald generator. I have developed a star Rodin coil myself and I found out the truth. So it's beyond realm of theories, it has been applied.
Workch: Testimonies are not evidence. Testimonies is the act of making more and more claims. Believers don't know what evidence is. Evidence is testable, repeatable and reproducible anytime and anyday. L
Why do you people think a testimony by a pastor on youtube is evidence?
But they are enough to send you to jail under a judicial system? Are they not?
Workch: The truth is we cannot test anything in that video. How can we test that testimony to be true under a controlled condition?
Have you been able to verify theories of evolution and big bang under a controlled conditions? Yet you teach them to your gullible audience? Faith is not only thing that proves God' existence. In fact the easiest way is by common sense. Another way is by science but not a-friori (cause to effect) but posteriori ( effect to cause) The Bible is right in that. Go and learn about vortex mathematics works of non bias scientist like Nicholas Tesla and Michael Rodin. Shalom.
Workch: Testimonies are not evidence. Testimonies is the act of making more and more claims. Believers don't know what evidence is. Evidence is testable, repeatable and reproducible anytime and anyday.
Why do you people think a testimony by a pastor on youtube is evidence?
It shows you are not open to truth because you didn't bother to watch the video. That man is not a pastor. Watch the video then comment after.