Negro_Ntns:

I think that some of the topics we discuss are analysed from a perspective of an outsider looking into a variant model and trying to force/mold the model into conformity within the analytic rules.

If its true that joint account ownership cannot apply, then how can it be possible that this case can be defended on the basis of joint ownership? It is hereby determined that husband and the wife do not share ownership in each other's resource. Any action in which one or the other un-authoritatively accesses and takes posession of the other party's belonging, under the law of NairaLand, this action constitutes stealing.

Given the aforegoing reviews, the Honorable Judge Negro hereby rules that the defendant is guilty on five counts, 1 . theft, 2. aggravated pilfering, 3. grandiose stealing, 4. break and entry with the intention to steal, 5. grand larceny with intention to disposess.

The court shall reconvene to pass sentence. The judge need to take a palmy break. Court is hereby adjourned.

tell that to tetraoxosulphate IV acid abi na ch3coo him call himself

CH3COO:

jenny my dear, did you run out of a counter-intuitive response? _{the thief is always yawning and cursing. . . what a camel}

stannesi:

Steal from your spose any hw sha,  that is weird, 

Ma friend's dad once invited dpolice to investigate d whole house. including his wife and kids, brothers, in-laws,  so its wont be new thing if i do d same to ma wife,  maybe if she refused,  to confess, i'll give her serouis torture, lol,  i might invite Jack Baur,  to do rest, 

Anyhw sha,  i no get any spouse sha,  i pray she doesn't go that far,
takin money from where i placed it which she knows,  is different from takin money from where she doesnt know, which means u don't want her to know,  simple,

Mesmerize:

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm. .

Ma friend's dad once invited dpolice to investigate d whole house. including his wife and kids, brothers, in-laws, so its wont be new thing if i do d same to ma wife, maybe if she refused, to confess, i'll give her serouis torture, lol, i might invite Jack Baur, to do rest, Tongue
[sub][/sub]

I think that some of the topics we discuss are analysed from a perspective of an outsider looking into a variant model and trying to force/mold the model into conformity within the analytic rules.

If its true that joint account ownership cannot apply, then how can it be possible that this case can be defended on the basis of joint ownership? It is hereby determined that husband and the wife do not share ownership in each other's resource. Any action in which one or the other un-authoritatively accesses and takes posession of the other party's belonging, under the law of NairaLand, this action constitutes stealing.

Given the aforegoing reviews, the Honorable Judge Negro hereby rules that the defendant is guilty on five counts, 1 . theft, 2. aggravated pilfering, 3. grandiose stealing, 4. break and entry with the intention to steal, 5. grand larceny with intention to disposess.

The court shall reconvene to pass sentence. The judge need to take a palmy break. Court is hereby adjourned.

Shy-One:

If he has mistresses and is cheating on her - she should take as much as she can get her hands on, over and over and over again. Because she is no longer in a marriage. She is in a co-op occupied by herself, her husband and others - those others could possibly replace her one day so she should take whatever she can take and take it with a smile.

If he isn't cheating on her and is fulfilling the marriage covenant and is faithful to her and the marriage - she should be ashamed of herself.

Zahnda:

If what your hubby gives you for monthly expenditure isn't enough, GO GET A JOB. [b]There is a name for ladies who sit around expecting men to give them money [/b]because they sleep with them.