obyno6ix:


Barcanista keep up with the good work and don't mind the hypocrites. If somebody needs to be probed everybody will be probed. Simple. It is very simple. You can't cover some people while you witch hunt others that not fair. Nobody is justifying the missing $20 billion but if you want to fight corruption. Everybody will be involved.

mrmetoo1:
Resisted by who?? By you?? Please you're nothing but a joker.

I hate when people try to justify what people have done by saying "oh they're not the only thieves" Is money from NNPC missing or not?? Is there evidence of misappropriation of funds from NNPC or not?? Answer those questions first. As they have shown thieves have been ruling us, you guys too should also expose other thieves, nothing wrong with that.

This idea that because they're not the only ones stealing means we should all keep quiet is very stupid and dangerous. Please any evidence against Sanusi should be presented to us in form of an audit as well. Let them probe his tenure as governor. Let your voices be loud, do not rest until you achieve it. You saying we should overlook NNPC because the whistleblower too is a thief is very senseless

P.S.

Reading your defense again on why thieves shouldn't be called thieves because there are other thieves, you mentioned a federal high court dismissed Sanusi's case, keyword FEDERAL. Writing Osinbajo's name in bold doesn't stop it from being a federal court, this is at a time Osinbajo didn't have any federal powers. Technically he still doesn't as I write have any federal powers.

Bennymontana:
can you dream of putting up a reasonable thread backed up with fact and figures? You"re really the sore loser here seeking attention with your empty rants off someone's investigative research that has just made front page! Pathetic Dullard!

danlaw:


Please don't come here and mislead the public, FRCN has no prosecutorial or even investigative (criminal) powers, that power belongs to the ICPC, EFCC, the Nigerian Police and other organs. Please read the FRCN act to know the limit of its powers. If the FRCN had any case against Sanusi, the best they can do is to pass their info to appropriate authorities. May i ask,how many people had FRCN ever investigated and prosecuted or was FRCN only formed for Sanusi?


FRCN did not even carry out any investigation, all they did was to ask for the audited accounts of CBN and then out of the top of their heads, they say this amount is too much and that amount is too high and so Sanusi stole money.

You are comparing Stella Oduah's case to Sanusi's case? Stella odua was indicted by the House of Reps, she was even indicted by the investigative panel set up by the presidency. Stella Oduah was indicted for buying Cars at exorbitant prices without budgetary approvals and without following due process.Up till today, we are yet to see the two BMWs that was bought for $1.6 million. I feel sorry for people that take you serious.

barcanista:
Let me tell you, every Supervisory Agncy have right to investigate those under them. In fact, the Kangaroo judge never said FRC lack the power to investigate. Even Sanusi responded to FRC's petition before his indictment. Investigation/probe and Prosecution are Two different things.

After investigation comes prosecution. Only the EFCC,ICPC and Police are empowere for that but Emir "thief" Sanusi had to stop this.

A Federal High Court in Lagos has restrained the Nigeria Police and the Department of State Services from arresting or harrassing the suspended Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria, Sanusi Lamido.
The court also ordered the DSS to release Mr. Sanusi’s passport to him immediately while also awarding the embattled CBN boss N50 million in exemplary damages.
Mr. Sanusi’s passport was seized on February 20, as he arrived the Lagos international airport, hours after he was suspended as CBN Governor by President Goodluck Jonathan.
He was briefly detained as well.
Mr. Sanusi, in separate suits, had challenged his suspension, and asked for enforcement of his fundamental rights as enshrined in the Nigerian constitution.
The court, on February 21, granted an interim order, restraining the respondents from arresting, detaining, or harassing the applicant pending the determination of the substantive suit.
The interim order was sequel to an affidavit of urgency filed by the applicant on the same date.
On Monday, the court adjourned to April 3 ruling on the preliminary objection raised against the restraining order by the SSS and the police.
The court has now ruled, saying the government and its agencies have no basis to arrest or harass Mr. Sanusi.
The court also frowned at the seizure of the CBN Governor’s travelling documents.
During the hearing of the rights’ suit, on Monday, the respondents – the Attorney General of the Federation, AGF; the Police; and the SSS – made different claims.
The agency SSS said it was investigating Mr. Sanusi for allegedly financing terrorism.
The SSS’ counsel, Moses Idakwo, said Mr. Sanusi’s interaction with SSS officials did not last for up to an hour and did not constitute a violation of his rights.
He said the provisions of Section 6 of the National Security Agencies’ Act empowered the Service to impound the international passport of suspects pending the conclusion of investigations.
On Monday, however, Mr. Sanusi’s counsel, Kola Awodehin, accused the SSS of falsehood in its new claim against the bank chief, saying the agency had no shred of evidence.
The counsel to the AGF, Fabian Ajogwu, had objected to the suit, urging the court to strike it out for want of jurisdiction.
Mr. Ajogwu argued that the provisions of Section 254 (c) 1 (d) of the 1999 Constitution (as amended) ousted the court’s jurisdiction to entertain the suit.
He noted that the case before the court borders on the applicant’s employment, saying that labour -related cases are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the National Industrial Court, NIC.
“Section 254 (c) 1 (d) of the Constitution vests exclusive jurisdiction on the National Industrial Court, with respect to civil causes or matters touching on employment, labour or industrial relations.
“We respectfully urge the court to hold that it has no jurisdiction to entertain the reliefs sought by the applicant,” he said.
The counsel urged the court to strike out the suit.
Mr. Ajogwu also argued that the applicant should not, by the suit, seek to restrain the respondents from performing their constitutional duties.
He argued that Mr. Sanusi was being investigated based on the FRCN’s claims. He said the suspended bank chief was being investigated in accordance with the provisions of the law, which the respondents had a statutory duty to perform.
Citing the dictum of retired Justice Niki Tobi of the Supreme Court in the case of Adeniran vs Alao, Mr. Ajogwu submitted that a perpetual injunction would be everlasting and could not be granted by
a court of law.
“The applicant’s suit is basically an action to shield him from the machinery of administration of justice, which has been kick-started by the respondents,” Mr. Ajogwu submitted.
While the AGF said Mr. Sanusi was being investigated based on the FRCN investigations, the police said it was not investigating the CBN boss.
The counsel to the police, David Abuo, said nobody ever reported Mr. Sanusi to the police.
He, however aligned with Mr. Ajogwu, saying the case should be struck out as it seeks to bar government agencies from performing their duties.
However, responding to the respondents’ preliminary objection, counsel to Mr. Sanusi, Mr. Awodehin submitted that the court was vested with the jurisdiction to entertain the suit.
He argued that the suit had nothing to do with the terms of employment of the applicant or industrial relations, since it was not a case of the applicant against the Central Bank of Nigeria.
He argued that the applicant never sought an order of perpetual injunction, adding that the reliefs he sought were qualified.
“It cannot be suggested that the applicant is restraining the respondents from performing their duties, but they must be restrained from doing so without due process of the law.
“The seizure of the applicant’s international passport by the third respondent is a derogation of his freedom of movement,” he said.
Mr. Awodehin also argued that the different submissions by the three respondents showed that laws were being violated in Mr. Sanusi’s treatment.
“The first to third respondents give conflicting reasons as to the complaint made against the applicant.
“This conflict goes to show that they acted without due process of the law,” he said.
The counsel also argued that the SSS’ claim of financing terrorism was bogus.
“The allegation against the applicant as to funding of terrorism is an afterthought by the respondents which is not backed by facts, as there is no reasonable suspicion that the applicant committed any crime,” he said.
He urged the court to dismiss the preliminary objection and uphold the case of the applicant.

Chiaka:
Been saying this all day...


If Sanusi has his proof let him put it forward or forever keep shut! not just talking mouth! mouth!,
So that based on his prove investigation will be made.
Not just raining accusation.....he keeps changing the figure....Even himself should be investigated,
he was also a public servant as CBN governor and was relieved off office because misappropriation

barcanista:
Let me tell you, every Supervisory Agncy have right to investigate those under them. In fact, the Kangaroo judge never said FRC lack the power to investigate. Even Sanusi responded to FRC's petition before his indictment. Investigation/probe and Prosecution are Two different things.

After investigation comes prosecution. Only the EFCC,ICPC and Police are empowere for that but Emir "thief" Sanusi had to stop this.

chemali:




This is what happened in the courts! Use your brains

Bennymontana:
can you dream of putting up a reasonable thread backed up with fact and figures? You"re really the sore loser here seeking attention with your empty rants off someone's investigative research that has just made front page! Pathetic Dullard!

barcanista:
Don't mind those hypocritical Apostles of APC and bigots. They can insult all they like it won't affect me one bit...


Cc: Lalasticlala Ishilove Truckpusher Ganjafarmer Whynotthetruth Dearpreye Anonimi Francizy SeverusSnape

themilanway:


And you will be the first to criticize him when he focus all his time and attention to probe the PDP government of the past 15yrs.Are you not a genius?

Go through my posts you will see where i come from,The Ijaw Nation should count out the Igbo's in their scheme of things.

Igbo's refused to see beyond their nose when they voted PDP.

Swazoski:
MAY GOD PUNISH YOU BARCANISTA .IDIOT .FOOLS OLE. U WILL DIE IN KIRIKI PRISON. MAY 29 IS NEAR..I wil make sure i track you down.thnkGOD my fiancee is lieutenant col..PDP THIEVE.WHEN U DON SWALLOW MONEY.

Swazoski:
MAY GOD PUNISH YOU BARCANISTA .IDIOT .FOOLS OLE. U WILL DIE IN KIRIKI PRISON. MAY 29 IS NEAR..I wil make sure i track you down.thnkGOD my fiancee is lieutenant col..PDP THIEVE.WHEN U DON SWALLOW MONEY.

barcanista:
Let me tell you, every Supervisory Agncy have right to investigate those under them. In fact, the Kangaroo judge never said FRC lack the power to investigate. Even Sanusi responded to FRC's petition before his indictment. Investigation/probe and Prosecution are Two different things.

After investigation comes prosecution. Only the EFCC,ICPC and Police are empowere for that but Emir "thief" Sanusi had to stop this.

Themaingate:
@op you are a pathetic looser and most of us here dont take you serious again

Mogidi:


Sanusi was playing out the APC script, how can one embezzlement be worse than other embezzlements?

gratiaeo:
Remember how almost APC members fought to make Sanusi Emir of Kanu just to shield him from prosecution. We already know the hypocrisy APC are but they will soon meet their Waterloo

Swazoski:
MAY GOD PUNISH YOU BARCANISTA .IDIOT .FOOLS OLE. U WILL DIE IN KIRIKI PRISON. MAY 29 IS NEAR..I wil make sure i track you down.thnkGOD my fiancee is lieutenant col..PDP THIEVE.WHEN U DON SWALLOW MONEY.

Swazoski:
MAY GOD PUNISH YOU BARCANISTA .IDIOT .FOOLS OLE. U WILL DIE IN KIRIKI PRISON. MAY 29 IS NEAR..I wil make sure i track you down.thnkGOD my fiancee is lieutenant col..PDP THIEVE.WHEN U DON SWALLOW MONEY.

obyno6ix:


Barcanista keep up with the good work and don't mind the hypocrites. If somebody needs to be probed everybody will be probed. Simple. It is very simple. You can't cover some people while you witch hunt others that not fair. Nobody is justifying the missing $20 billion but if you want to fight corruption. Everybody will be involved.

Chiaka:
Been saying this all day...


If Sanusi has his proof let him put it forward or forever keep shut! not just talking mouth! mouth!,
So that based on his prove investigation will be made.
Not just raining accusation.....he keeps changing the figure....Even himself should be investigated,
he was also a public servant as CBN governor and was relieved off office because misappropriation

patrickmuf:
GEJ has since appointed Sanusi the pro-chancellor of uniben...Now, what more can you describe as hypocrisy?
Barcanista, this singular action of GEJ has rendered this your latest epistle insignificant...
For me, it's either GEJ is trying to curry favour from Sanusi in view of the impending probe or Sanusi is not guilty of the aforementioned suspicions...Simple logic I've applied here...