CFCfan:
I believe people have the inherent right to refuse commercial services to anyone. Forcing florists or bakers to provide services to same-sex couples is tantamount to dictatorship.

I will simply say I can't bake that design.
I wonder why gay couples are always playing victim, what evidence do they have that they were turned down because they are gay?

Even if that's the case. Na them open shop for the person? Every business man reserves the right to provide services to whoever he deems fit. They gat too much rights over there o

Kachisbarbie:


I will simply say I can't bake that design.
I wonder why gay couples are always playing victim, what evidence do they have that they were turned down because they are gay?

Even if that's the case. Na them open shop for the person? Every business man reserves the right to provide services to whoever he deems fit. They gat too much rights over there o

CFCfan:

Nne, the case may go all the way to the US Supreme Court. I'll predict that the Court will hold that private businesses have the right to refuse service to anybody.

CFCfan:
I believe people have the inherent right to refuse commercial services to anyone. Forcing florists or bakers to provide services to same-sex couples is tantamount to dictatorship.

CFCfan:
I believe people have the inherent right to refuse commercial services to anyone. Forcing florists or bakers to provide services to same-sex couples is tantamount to dictatorship.

Sagamite:


Look at how people are affected at work for not supporting homosexual agenda.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicky_Morgan_%28politician%29#Minister_for_Women_and_Equalities

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Grayling#Gay_couples_in_B.26Bs_controversy

Those are 2 current cabinet ministers.

See the way they were dragooned to eventually publicly support homosexuality?

I have said it severally, it is not tolerated in the UK for any public figure (especially a politician) to publicly be against homosexual agenda.

The press and homosexual mafia will vilify that person.

And some fuuktards would turn around and ask that moronic question "how does what 2 consenting adults do in the privacy of their bedroom affect you"? Asking it feeling funky and intellectual.

Cretins!

crackhaus:
So I guess if the baker turns down the offer to bake for a gay couples' wedding because he/she has been overbooked, it won't be called discrimination huh..
I keep saying that these gay folks as well as their apologists are not only genetically malformed, but categorically & inherently stvpid.

I mean why do they keep trying to force people into accepting their shitty sexual orientation...

revolt:
read the story, the baker said its against his religous belief..... he cud hve used another xcuse not discriminate.... i mean there r loads of excuses naw.

crackhaus:

Isn't this the point I was making, or you just needed to type something contrary?

If I was a smart Baker and a gay couple required my services, I might as well make up another excuse so it's not seen as discrimination even when in my heart, I truly didn't accept because of their sexual orientation.

This is why I called them stvpid in my initial comment, because the joke would be on them... get it?

Sagamite:
So much for that ignorant but yet hackneyed "how does what 2 consenting adults do in the privacy of their bedroom affect you" that self-proclaimed "liberals" ask and feel it is an intelligent question.

EnlightenedSoul:


It reminds of Muslim taxi drivers who're complaining about patrons bringing their dogs along for the ride. If your religion prohibits you from making contact with dogs, you probably shouldn't work in the public transportation sector where you'll come in contact with all kinds of pets, dogs especially and seeing eye-dogs inclusive. If your religion prohibits you from selling smokes and alcohol, maybe your shouldn't work at that corner store. If you're a darn florist, and you can't get yourself to arrange some flowers for a gay couple because of your religion, then you better get ready 'cuz gays don't joke with their bouquets!

As Americans, if we're trigger/gun happy, we're def money happy. And when we're unhappy, we sue!

You're a baker, aren't you? You'd better bake that damn cake before I sue your ar.se to oblivion! lol

Dude, you won't even know what hit you.

EnlightenedSoul:


It reminds of Muslim taxi drivers who're complaining about patrons bringing their dogs along for the ride. If your religion prohibits you from making contact with dogs, you probably shouldn't work in the public transportation sector where you'll come in contact with all kinds of pets, dogs especially and seeing eye-dogs inclusive. If your religion prohibits you from selling smokes and alcohol, maybe your shouldn't work at that corner store. If you're a darn florist, and you can't get yourself to arrange some flowers for a gay couple because of your religion, then you better get ready 'cuz gays don't joke with their bouquets!

As Americans, if we're trigger/gun happy, we're def money happy. And when we're unhappy, we sue!

You're a baker, aren't you? You'd better bake that damn cake before I sue your ar.se to oblivion! lol

Dude, you won't even know what hit you.

crackhaus:

But I'm overbooked for the weekend and for lack of time and resources after being spread so thin, I can't accept your request for my services.

Why would you sue me for getting overbooked, isn't America the land of the free and home of the brave anymore?

omoharry:
Are here you are ...A proud citizen of a very sick society called AMERICA...you should be ashamed of the nonsense that comes out of your mouth. Rubbish.

EnlightenedSoul:


Sly you. That would've been the smarter approach. He should've known better.

Remember that controversy over the bar sign? We actually have one hanging locally. You can get away with certain things in some areas.

crackhaus:

People should be allowed to choose who they want to render their services to regardless.

EnlightenedSoul:


It reminds of Muslim taxi drivers who're complaining about patrons bringing their dogs along for the ride. If your religion prohibits you from making contact with dogs, you probably shouldn't work in the public transportation sector where you'll come in contact with all kinds of pets, dogs especially and seeing eye-dogs inclusive. If your religion prohibits you from selling smokes and alcohol, maybe your shouldn't work at that corner store. If you're a darn florist, and you can't get yourself to arrange some flowers for a gay couple because of your religion, then you better get ready 'cuz gays don't joke with their bouquets!

As Americans, if we're trigger/gun happy, we're def money happy. And when we're unhappy, we sue!

You're a baker, aren't you? You'd better bake that damn cake before I sue your ar.se to oblivion! lol

Dude, you won't even know what hit you.

manny4life:


It's comments like this that seriously make me pity mankind. What are you talking about? Is a taxi ride "Public Transportation"? It's their taxi, their own vehicle and they obtained a city permit to ride it, what makes it "public transportation"? Like race, religion is a protected class and as such, if my religion bars me from such, then so be it. I can simply refuse a ride to anyone with animals because I want it. Same reason why retail stores bar persons with animals (except service animals) into the store. The store is the property of the owner, and just because they extend their service to you (public) doesn't mean you have a right to them.