Ritchiee:
lol...you are deludedly deluded.You are mostly traders but when you talk the real entrepreneurs especially technologicqlly,the Yorubas towers over the Igbos like the sky to the earth...Name your technocrats...Okonjo Iweala ,Oruteh and whatever...lol.
Yoruba have them in abundance and you know it.Home and abroad...thanks to the Most High.

Do you want *ick measuring,I mean with links?You bring link to confirm and I bring mine...lol
YOU ARE SERIOUSLY DELU***

You and your usual nonsense sef...

totit:



Flawed you wrote because it's not UNDP and UN?

Now tell me why should your link be consider then?

Secondly, why not consider the questions raised my kaakulator3 if you are sure of your link since the link you provided prompted that questions?

Here again, is his questions :


Do you agree Taraba,Jigawa,Katsina,Yobe and Kebbi are more economically viable than all South-east states?

Do you agree these states are more economically viable than Akwa-Ibom,Cross-River and Bayelsa?




Mind you, whatever you answer might be will expose whose link is legit and indeed if you believe in your so called link?

Waiting

You need your head examined. No where in those stats was it indicated that Taraba or Katsina is more economically sustainable than the SE.

You have lost it.

The OPHID report is flawed because it is not in tandem with reality on ground.

My guess on how they arrived at Osun being the least poverty stricken state is by taking cognizance of Osun formally employed populace, who were mainly employed by the government, those type of stats are easily obtained, Osun has no informal sector, everybody works for the government, giving a false impression of high employment rate, when in truth, Osun had an overbloated government work force solely dependent on ND petroldollars that came as monthly allocation, and on aggressive interest loans.

If crude oil prices didn't crash, Osun would continue posting ridiculous GDP and IGR stats to cover her overbloated civil service and complete reliance on FG monthly allocation, while gullible Yorubas cheer on, but with crash in crude oil, Osun's overbloated civil service and lack of informal sector became exposed.
https://www.nairaland.com/2529594/yoruba-citizens-sent-south-east

Above is Osun learning the need for a robust informal sector.

In contrast, the SE has a very vibrant informal sector, that would be very hard to access by Oxford, for how do you explain to them that a supposedly unemployed Igbo apprentice in Ogbete market, makes more money daily from extra charges he adds to his Oga goods than a minimum wage earning civil servant?

Only a micro economics assessment that takes real cognizance of these, like the one conducted by NAPEP https://www.nairaland.com/554457/anambra-poverty-rate-lowest-nigeriaand CBN can give a better picture of poverty rate stats.:

totit:



Flawed you wrote because it's not UNDP and UN?

Now tell me why should your link be consider then?

Secondly, why not consider the questions raised my kaakulator3 if you are sure of your link since the link you provided prompted that questions?

Here again, is his questions :


Do you agree Taraba,Jigawa,Katsina,Yobe and Kebbi are more economically viable than all South-east states?

Do you agree these states are more economically viable than Akwa-Ibom,Cross-River and Bayelsa?




Mind you, whatever you answer might be will expose whose link is legit and indeed if you believe in your so called link?

Waiting

You and him are asking questions that doesn't exist. No where did the link I posted suggested that Jigawa and Taraba are more economically viable than SE. You are asking a question that doesn't exist.
More like clutching at straws.

Marcelini:


That research was done by Oxford university and not by UNDP, and the flaws in their research were made bare by a more authentic MDGs attainment result which is more in consonance with the reality on ground.
.: https://www.nairaland.com/2263635/south-east-south-west-south-south-lead-attainment

That Oxford university study was published in a UNDP report and was not conducted by UNDP or UN, and the flaws inherent in that study was well highlighted in this thread. by Igbo posters there.

You can't give what you don't have. SW being less economically viable than SE cannot have lower poverty index than SE.: https://www.nairaland.com/2263635/south-east-south-west-south-south-lead-attainment


https://www.nairaland.com/2418994/ranking-nigerian-states-poverty-rates/9. See Igbo contingents demolish those flawed stats there

You are making yourself a laughing stock by providing only one link which even signifies that some northern states are economically viable than your SE going by your logic.That your solitary link was done in 2014 and the newer UNO...UNDP...OPHI collaboration poverty index encompassing 101 countries including Nigeria was done in 2015 and you are still yarning dust.Okay this is WORLD BANK report still affirming that SW towers over dreaming/fantasy inclined SE like sky to the earth...lol

WORLD BANK says...here we come with the decider/finisher.If you don't believe this,then you are somebody who argues for argument sake and you are a fluke...

Nigerian economy is revealed to be far more
diversified and dynamic than previous numbers
would suggest, with significant contributions to
growth coming from manufacturing and various
services that were underestimated in the past. The
nature of this growth implies that it is much more
concentrated in urban areas than previously
believed. Average growth in agriculture was only
4.2% during 2011-2013, and is estimated to have
fallen under to under 3% in each of 2011 and
2013. Thus, growth in agriculture in many rural
areas in Nigeria would appear to be not much
greater than population growth, which is estimated
at close to 3% for the nation.
The NER then provides an updated analysis of
poverty and living standards in Nigeria based on a
panel survey of 5,000 households that was carried
out in 2010/2011 and 2012/2013 as part of the
General Household Survey of the Nigeria National
Bureau of Statistics. The results are generally
consistent with the newly re-based GDP numbers:
· The panel survey gives evidence that the per
capital poverty rate (Nigerian definition based on
less than 3000 calorie-a-day consumption) is
significantly lower than had been previously
estimated. From this survey, it is estimated that
33.1% of the population lived below the poverty
line in 2012/2013.
· Poverty is much lower in urban areas (12.6%)
than in rural areas (44.9%), and the urban poverty
reduction dynamic is much stronger.
The NER also documents major differences in
poverty and living standards by macro-region in
Nigeria. While the South of Nigeria has relatively
low poverty rates, ranging from 16% in the South
West to 28.8% in the South East, poverty rates in
the North West and North East are 45.9% and
50.2%, respectively. While the South of Nigeria
(especially the South West) has experienced a
strong positive dynamic in poverty reduction in
recent years, the poverty rate in the North West
has remained stagnant, while poverty has actually
increased in the North East. Thus, disparities
between the North (North West, North East) and
South of Nigeria in poverty and living standards
have increased. This is no doubt related to the
recent security challenges in the Northern part of
Nigeria. Explanatory factors for the high differences
in living standards by geographical region are
likely related to differences in the provision of
public services and the degree of connectedness to
larger markets.


http://www.worldbank.org/en/country/nigeria/publication/nigeria-economic-report-improved-economic-outlook-in-2014-and-prospects-for-continued-growth-look-good

Marcelini:


You and him are asking questions that doesn't exist. No where did the link I posted suggested that Jigawa and Taraba are more economically viable than SE. You are asking a question that doesn't exist.
More like clutching at straws.

Well, I want to belief " Ritchiee" have just done justice to that now?

Are you satisfy now, there you have it ;

[b]WORLD BANK says...here we come with the decider/finisher.If you don't believe this,then you are somebody who argues for argument sake and you are a fluke...

Nigerian economy is revealed to be far more
diversified and dynamic than previous numbers
would suggest, with significant contributions to
growth coming from manufacturing and various
services that were underestimated in the past. The
nature of this growth implies that it is much more
concentrated in urban areas than previously
believed. Average growth in agriculture was only
4.2% during 2011-2013, and is estimated to have
fallen under to under 3% in each of 2011 and
2013. Thus, growth in agriculture in many rural
areas in Nigeria would appear to be not much
greater than population growth, which is estimated
at close to 3% for the nation.
The NER then provides an updated analysis of
poverty and living standards in Nigeria based on a
panel survey of 5,000 households that was carried
out in 2010/2011 and 2012/2013 as part of the
General Household Survey of the Nigeria National
Bureau of Statistics. The results are generally
consistent with the newly re-based GDP numbers:
· The panel survey gives evidence that the per
capital poverty rate (Nigerian definition based on
less than 3000 calorie-a-day consumption) is
significantly lower than had been previously
estimated. From this survey, it is estimated that
33.1% of the population lived below the poverty
line in 2012/2013.
· Poverty is much lower in urban areas (12.6%)
than in rural areas (44.9%), and the urban poverty
reduction dynamic is much stronger.
The NER also documents major differences in
poverty and living standards by macro-region in
Nigeria. While the South of Nigeria has relatively
low poverty rates, ranging from 16% in the South
West to 28.8% in the South East, poverty rates in
the North West and North East are 45.9% and
50.2%, respectively. While the South of Nigeria
(especially the South West) has experienced a
strong positive dynamic in poverty reduction in
recent years, the poverty rate in the North West
has remained stagnant, while poverty has actually
increased in the North East. Thus, disparities
between the North (North West, North East) and
South of Nigeria in poverty and living standards
have increased. This is no doubt related to the
recent security challenges in the Northern part of
Nigeria. Explanatory factors for the high differences
in living standards by geographical region are
likely related to differences in the provision of
public services and the degree of connectedness to
larger markets.


http://www.worldbank.org/en/country/nigeria/publication/nigeria-economic-report-improved-economic-outlook-in-2014-and-prospects-for-continued-growth-look-good[/b]

Can you see now that you are the one that need your head examine.

I hope you won't ask for Aba report this time

Happy sunday

Other cultures are largely more accommodating than the igbos such that they are not encouraged to invest in igboland.

Ramnon2:
Are igbos economically savvy?
They hold 99% of the economy of their zone, while holding between 20-60% of the economy of other zones in Nigeria. This is a huge advantage, I believe.


Is this largely insular economy an advantage to the Igbos? For example, no ''foreign'' (by which I mean non Igbo Nigerians or real foreigners) entity can threaten to ''pull away'' their investments in Igboland, because ''foreigners'' invest little in Igboland to begin with. Virtually everything in Igboland is owned by Igbos.

My one advise for Igbos is for them to go slow on their one-man business mentality and form groups of business people among IGBOS only. Put their companies on the stock exchange for Igbos only. That way they can gain the advantage of economies of scale and still maintain their insularity.

One thing they are doing well, so far: they have business partners abroad, such as in China, USA, EU, Brazil, India etc. They must keep those partners by all means.

However, this ''Igbo only investment'' mentality in Igboland may pose a problem for Igbos when/if Nigeria separates. Igbos will lose nearly every investment they have elsewhere in Nigeria, and would not have equivalents of such businesses owned by non-Igbos in Igboland that they could confiscate in retaliation.

Also, politically, Igbos are still infants and need to learn how to play the game Nigerian style, which is ''eat them or they eat you first''.

SonOfEl:

You and your usual nonsense sef...

lol...howdie?

" The NER then provides an updated analysis of poverty and living standards in Nigeria based on a panel survey of 5,000 households that was carried out in 2010/2011 and 2012/2013 as part of the General Household Survey of the Nigeria National Bureau of Statistics".

The world bank never conducted any research on Nigeria poverty rates, they simply used the Data from the Nigeria National Bureau, the same falsified results conducted in 2013 by a Yoruba man that placed Osun GDP greater than those of all SE states, it's no surprising why their results are flawed.

The same flawed stat that placed Niger state as the state with least poverty rate:https://www.naij.com/401470-see-the-10-poorest-states-in-nigeria.html

And I suspect the Oxford university used same flawed NBS flawed stats, hence their flawed result.

Marcelini:


That research was done by Oxford university and not by UNDP, and the flaws in their research were made bare by a more authentic MDGs attainment result which is more in consonance with the reality on ground.
.: https://www.nairaland.com/2263635/south-east-south-west-south-south-lead-attainment

That Oxford university study was published in a UNDP report and was not conducted by UNDP or UN, and the flaws inherent in that study was well highlighted in this thread. by Igbo posters there.

You can't give what you don't have. SW being less economically viable than SE cannot have lower poverty index than SE.: https://www.nairaland.com/2263635/south-east-south-west-south-south-lead-attainment


https://www.nairaland.com/2418994/ranking-nigerian-states-poverty-rates/9. See Igbo contingents demolish those flawed stats there

Bro did you go to school at all? Someone quoted information from World bank, UNDP and FAO to buttress his point, you came up with quotes from nairaland to counter his opinion. Are you for real? when did information on Nairaland created by someone with sentiment becomes a good reference for intellectual discourse?

weedcrusha:


Bro did you go to school at all? Someone quoted information from World bank, UNDP and FAO to buttress is point, you came up with quotes from nairaland to counter his opinion. Are you for real? when did information on Nairaland created by someone with sentiment becomes a good reference for intellectual discourse?

You get time oo

I am sure this was configured by Yoruba, no Yoruba man is the CEO of world bank hence he pull off these figures :




The NER also documents major differences in poverty and living standards by macro-region in Nigeria.   While the South of Nigeria has relatively low poverty rates, ranging from 16% in the South West to 28.8% in the South East, poverty rates in the North West and North East are 45.9% and 50.2%, respectively.  While the South of Nigeria (especially the South West) has experienced a strong positive dynamic in poverty reduction in recent years, the poverty rate in the North West has remained stagnant, while poverty has actually increased in the North East. Thus, disparities between the North (North West, North East) and South of Nigeria in poverty and living standards have increased.    This is no doubt related to the recent security challenges in the Northern part of Nigeria. Explanatory factors for the high differences in living standards by geographical region are likely related to differences in the provision of public services and the degree of connectedness to larger markets.


http://www.worldbank.org/en/country/nigeria/publication/nigeria-economic-report-improved-economic-outlook-in-2014-and-prospects-for-continued-growth-look-good




Isn't it funny? That's IPOD logic for you

Hhehehehehehe

Marcelini:


Only SS is more economically viable than SE and the reason is not far fetched.

Yes, I will keep referencing that thread, cause it dealth severely with your falsehoods, even Osun previously inflated IGR couldn't stand the test of fire, once the dwindling oil prices started biting them, Aregbesola had to come out clean to tell the world what Osun GDP is really, and why it won't be enough to sustain the state.

You are proud to reference a thread that used a report that spelt yourbudget.com as yourbidget.com. Shame on people that lectured you in school.

Glaring error from the report our friend is quoting

As you can see from the screenshot, Internally Generated Revenue is N871.19bn and Average Monthly Revenue is 4.56bn

Meanwhile, Average Monthly Revenue supposed to equal FAAC Allocation + VAT + Internally Generated Revenue + 13% Share of Derivation

This is just an error observed by glancing through this falsified report. I'm quite sure if I peruse this propaganda, I will point out tens of errors. As you can all see, the report is probably written by an Igbo guy. Though they know how to falsify records and write propaganda, however, they are not so good in doing it because you will surely see flaws if you look well.

https://www.nairaland.com/2952666/ekiti-leads-nigeria-residents-defecate#43193196

weedcrusha:


Bro did you go to school at all? Someone quoted information from World bank, UNDP and FAO to buttress his point, you came up with quotes from nairaland to counter his opinion. Are you for real? when did information on Nairaland created by someone with sentiment becomes a good reference for intellectual discourse?

your attention is needed there.

Marcelini:
" The NER then provides an updated analysis of poverty and living standards in Nigeria based on a panel survey of 5,000 households that was carried out in 2010/2011 and 2012/2013 as part of the General Household Survey of the Nigeria National Bureau of Statistics".

The world bank never conducted any research on Nigeria poverty rates, they simply used the Data from the Nigeria National Bureau, the same falsified results conducted in 2013 by a Yoruba man that placed Osun GDP greater than those of all SE states, it's no surprising why their results are flawed.

The same flawed stat that placed Niger state as the state with least poverty rate:https://www.naij.com/401470-see-the-10-poorest-states-in-nigeria.html

And I suspect the Oxford university used same flawed NBS flawed stats, hence their flawed result.

LET US KNOW WHO YOU ARE GOING TO BELIEVE (so that I can bring their report concerning poverty in Nigeria )IF YOU DON'T BELIEVE THE MAN(MANUFACTURE),UNDP,UNO,WORLD BANK AND NOW THE NBS...
There is no data collected in Nigeria that would not come from NBS if it is going to be authentic.

The MDGS that some of your people were ejaculating on and LOOK WHO IS GOING TO SCHOOL IN NIGERIA...all had the hand of the NBS and you believed them... :olol

READ THIS FROM MDGS TEAM AND NBS:
It is in recognition of this important role of data and in demonstration of the
commitment of the federal government
to meeting the targets of the MDGs, that
National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) commissioned the 2014 MDGs Performance
Tracking Survey. This is the second round of the survey and it is designed to generate specific indicators to monitor progress of the MDGs across the goals. These findings will also help policy makers identify gaps and challenges to the realization of the goals and proffer solutions to ultimately achieve a successful completion of the MDGs targets by 2015. The survey generated several indicators across seven of the eight MDG goals to track progress...


Go and read about YOMI kALE the Tactician General,a staunch member of the PDP and staunch loyalist to Okonjo Iweala who brought him in,maybe that is why he manipulated everything in favour of the SE in LOOK WHO IS GOING TO SCHOOL...


YOU ARE A BAD LOSER,SIR.

Ritchiee:


LET US NO WHO YOU ARE GOING TO BELIEVE (so that I can bring their report concerning poverty in Nigeria )IF YOU DON'T BELIEVE THE MAN(MANUFACTURE),UNDP,UNO,WORLD BANK AND NOW THE NBS...
There is no data collected in Nigeria that would not come from NBS if it is going to be authentic.

The MDGS that some of your people were ejaculating on and LOOK WHO IS GOING TO SCHOOL IN NIGERIA...all had the hand of the NBS and you believed them... :olol

READ THIS FROM MDGS TEAM AND NBS:
It is in recognition of this important role of data and in demonstration of the
commitment of the federal government
to meeting the targets of the MDGs, that
National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) commissioned the 2014 MDGs Performance
Tracking Survey. This is the second round of the survey and it is designed to generate specific indicators to monitor progress of the MDGs across the goals. These findings will also help policy makers identify gaps and challenges to the realization of the goals and proffer solutions to ultimately achieve a successful completion of the MDGs targets by 2015. The survey generated several indicators across seven of the eight MDG goals to track progress...


Go and read about YOMI kALE the Tactician General,a staunch member of the PDP and staunch loyalist to Okonjo Iweala who brought him in,maybe that is why he manipulated everything in favour of the SE in LOOK WHO IS GOING TO SCHOOL...


YOU ARE A BAD LOSER,SIR.

The only report he believes is that flawed report I showed above............What a loser!

Ritchiee:


LET US NO WHO YOU ARE GOING TO BELIEVE (so that I can bring their report concerning poverty in Nigeria )IF YOU DON'T BELIEVE THE MAN(MANUFACTURE),UNDP,UNO,WORLD BANK AND NOW THE NBS...
There is no data collected in Nigeria that would not come from NBS if it is going to be authentic.

The MDGS that some of your people were ejaculating on and LOOK WHO IS GOING TO SCHOOL IN NIGERIA...all had the hand of the NBS and you believed them... :olol

READ THIS FROM MDGS TEAM AND NBS:
It is in recognition of this important role of data and in demonstration of the
commitment of the federal government
to meeting the targets of the MDGs, that
National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) commissioned the 2014 MDGs Performance
Tracking Survey. This is the second round of the survey and it is designed to generate specific indicators to monitor progress of the MDGs across the goals. These findings will also help policy makers identify gaps and challenges to the realization of the goals and proffer solutions to ultimately achieve a successful completion of the MDGs targets by 2015. The survey generated several indicators across seven of the eight MDG goals to track progress...


Go and read about YOMI kALE the Tactician General,a staunch member of the PDP and staunch loyalist to Okonjo Iweala who brought him in,maybe that is why he manipulated everything in favour of the SE in LOOK WHO IS GOING TO SCHOOL...


YOU ARE A BAD LOSER,SIR.

The MDGs can't be flawed, because it is in tandem with realities on ground and the criteria they used are measurable criteria that can easily reflect realities.

A poverty rate stat that makes use of bogus criteria, that ended up with Niger state having lesser poverty rate than Anambra, is obviously flawed, that's common sense.

Yes, neither the world bank nor UNDP conducted fresh poverty stats in Nigeria, they used figures directly from the flawed NBS stats.

The Jamb enrollment stat is a self evident stat, it can't be influenced, and it's JAMB that release them, not NBS.

The Joke is on you.

weedcrusha:


The only report he believes is that flawed report I showed above............What a loser!

Yea superman.Some intelligent Igbos who are reading this are saying nwoke abu nwoke nzuzu...lol.
He is really NWOKE NZUZU

https://www.nairaland.com/2952666/ekiti-leads-nigeria-residents-defecate#43193196

weedcrusha:


The only report he believes is that flawed report I showed above............What a loser!

Marcelini:


The MDGs can't be flawed, because it is in tandem with realities on ground and the criteria they used are measurable criteria that can easily reflect realities.

A poverty rate stat that makes use of bogus criteria, that ended up with Niger state having lesser poverty rate than Anambra, is obviously flawed, that's common sense.

Yes, neither the world bank nor UNDP conducted fresh poverty stats in Nigeria, they used figures directly from the flawed NBS stats.

The Jamb enrollment stat is a self evident stat, it can't be influenced, and it's JAMB that release them, not NBS.

The Joke is on you.

THE JOKE IS NOT ON YOU ONLY BUT THE JOKE DON CARRY YOU NACK YOU FOR GROUND COME REMOVE YOUR BRAIN PUT SAWDUST...One of the dumbest Igbos I have ever met

United Nations' Multi Dimensional Poverty Index

The United Nations' Global Multi-Dimensional Poverty Index has three dimensions and 10 indicators in estimating Overall Poverty. Each dimension is equally weighted, each indicator within a dimension is also equally weighted, and added. It uses 10 indicators to measure poverty in three dimensions: Education, Health and Living standards. This report was Published in June 2015, and is based on data collected on years between 2004 and 2014.
According to the MPI Report, as at 2010, 46% of Nigerians lived below the national poverty line (Only 28% in Urban areas, and near 70% in The rural). Although a Report by the World bank, released in 2014, showed that only 33% of Nigerians could be considered Poor.

THIS IS THE ONE FROM UNO...UNDP...OPHI COLLABORATION
States by Incidence of Poverty

STATES<-->POVERTY RATE
1. Lagos --------- 8.5%
2. Osun --------- 10.9%
3. Anambra --------- 11.2%
4. Ekiti --------- 12.9%
5. Edo --------- 19.2%
6. Imo --------- 19.8%
7. Abia --------- 21.0%
8. Rivers --------- 21.1%
*. FCT (Abj) --------- 23.5%
9. Kwara --------- 23.7%
10. Akwa Ibom --------- 23.8%
11. Delta --------- 25.1%
12. Ogun --------- 26.1%
13. Kogi --------- 26.4%
14. Ondo --------- 27.9%
15. Enugu --------- 28.8%
16. Bayelsa --------- 29.0%
17. Oyo --------- 29.4%
18. Cross River --------- 33.1%
-------------------------------------------------------
** National Avg --------- 46.0%
-------------------------------------------------------
19. Plateau --------- 51.6%
20. Nassarawa --------- 52.4%
21. Ebonyi --------- 56.0%
22. Kaduna --------- 56.5%
23. Adamawa --------- 59.0%
24. Benue --------- 59.2%
25. Niger --------- 61.2%
26. Borno --------- 70.1%
27. Kano --------- 76.4%
28. Gombe --------- 76.9%
29. Taraba --------- 77.7%
30. Katsina --------- 82.2%
31. Sokoto --------- 85.3%
32. Kebbi --------- 86.0%
33. Bauchi --------- 86.6%
34. Jigawa --------- 88.4%
35. Yobe --------- 90.2%
36. Zamfara --------- 91.9%

REGIONAL AVERAGES
1 = South West - 19.3% Poverty (+ Average)
2 = South South - 25.2% Poverty (+ Average)
3 = South East - 27.36% Poverty (+ Average)

----------------------------------------------------------------------
** National Avg 46.0%% Poverty
----------------------------------------------------------------------

4 = North Central - 45.7% Poverty (+Average)
5 = North East - 76.8% Poverty (- Average)
6 = North West- 80.9% Poverty (- Average) Damn!! shocked

Sources
The Global Multidimensional Poverty Index by the U.N.Global MPI

Global MPI 2015
Country briefings
Data tables
Case studies
Methodology
Infographics
Interactive Databank
MPI Resources
FAQs
Background

Global Multidimensional Poverty Index

Click for GLOBAL MPI 2015

Visit the Global MPI 2015 pages to access a wealth of resources, including case studies, infographics and an interactive databank, as well as country profiles, policy briefings, and downloadable data tables.
What is the global MPI?

The global Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) is an international measure of acute poverty covering over 100 developing countries. It complements traditional income-based poverty measures by capturing the severe deprivations that each person faces at the same time with respect to education, health and living standards.

The MPI assesses poverty at the individual level. If someone is deprived in a third or more of ten (weighted) indicators (see left), the global index identifies them as ‘MPI poor’, and the extent – or intensity – of their poverty is measured by the number of deprivations they are experiencing.

The MPI can be used to create a comprehensive picture of people living in poverty, and permits comparisons both across countries, regions and the world and within countries by ethnic group, urban/rural location, as well as other key household and community characteristics.

This makes it invaluable as an analytical tool to identify the most vulnerable people – the poorest among the poor, revealing poverty patterns within countries and over time, enabling policy makers to target resources and design policies more effectively.

The global MPI was developed by OPHI with the UN Development Programme (UNDP) for inclusion in UNDP’s flagship Human Development Report in 2010. It has been published in the HDR ever since.http://www.ophi.org.uk/multidimensional-poverty-index/
http://www.dataforall.org/dashboard/ophi/index.php/


THIS IS FROM WORLD BANK
The NER also documents major differences in poverty and living standards by macro-region in Nigeria. While the South of Nigeria has relatively low poverty rates, ranging from 16% in the South West to 28.8% in the South East, poverty rates in the North West and North East are 45.9% and 50.2%, respectively. While the South of Nigeria (especially the South West) has experienced a strong positive dynamic in poverty reduction in recent years, the poverty rate in the North West has remained stagnant, while poverty has actually increased in the North East. Thus, disparities between the North (North West, North East) and South of Nigeria in poverty and living standards have increased. This is no doubt related to the recent security challenges in the Northern part of Nigeria. Explanatory factors for the high differences in living standards by geographical region are likely related to differences in the provision of public services and the degree of connectedness to larger markets.

NER MEANS NIGERIA ECONOMIC REPORT..maybe it is a Yoruba man that owns it...
http://www.worldbank.org/en/country/nigeria/publication/nigeria-economic-report-improved-economic-outlook-in-2014-and-prospects-for-continued-growth-look-good

THIS IS FROM NBS

Poverty was least dominant in the Southwest (49.8%), South-South (55.5%), and South-East regions (59.5%).
Read more: https://www.naij.com/401470-see-the-10-poorest-states-in-nigeria.html

SO ALL OF THEM GANGED UP TO RIDICULE UNA ...NA WAH O.ILLITERACY IS INDEED A DISEASE
THEY ARRIVED AT DIFFERENT PERCENTAGES ALL DEPICTING THAT THE SOUTH EAST IS POVERTY RIDDEN THAN SOUTH/SOUTH AND SOUTH WEST..

The more reason you all run to the best South...

DikeOha882:
https://www.nairaland.com/2952666/ekiti-leads-nigeria-residents-defecate#43193196

You sound bitter bro...............

DailyPost investigation has revealed that over eighty percent of public primary schools in Enugu North Senatorial zone lacks toilet facilities.
The teachers and the pupils in the affected schools said they had become used to defecating in the bush,in what they refer to as “bush method”.
The schools affected are those in Udenu, Igbo-Eze North, Igbo-Eze South, Igbo-Etiti, Nsukka and Uzo-Uwani local government areas.

http://dailypost.ng/2013/02/21/investigation-shows-80-of-primary-schools-in-enugu-north-have-no-toilet-facilities/

Ritchiee:
THE JOKE IS NOT ON YOU ONLY BUT THE JOKE DON CARRY YOU NACK YOU FOR GROUND COME REMOVE YOUR BRAIN PUT SAWDUST...One of the dumbest Igbos I have ever met

United Nations' Multi Dimensional Poverty Index

The United Nations' Global Multi-Dimensional Poverty Index has three dimensions and 10 indicators in estimating Overall Poverty. Each dimension is equally weighted, each indicator within a dimension is also equally weighted, and added. It uses 10 indicators to measure poverty in three dimensions: Education, Health and Living standards. This report was Published in June 2015, and is based on data collected on years between 2004 and 2014.
According to the MPI Report, as at 2010, 46% of Nigerians lived below the national poverty line (Only 28% in Urban areas, and near 70% in The rural). Although a Report by the World bank, released in 2014, showed that only 33% of Nigerians could be considered Poor.

THIS IS THE ONE FROM UNO...UNDP...OPHI COLLABORATION
States by Incidence of Poverty

STATES<-->POVERTY RATE
1. Lagos --------- 8.5%
2. Osun --------- 10.9%
3. Anambra --------- 11.2%
4. Ekiti --------- 12.9%
5. Edo --------- 19.2%
6. Imo --------- 19.8%
7. Abia --------- 21.0%
8. Rivers --------- 21.1%
*. FCT (Abj) --------- 23.5%
9. Kwara --------- 23.7%
10. Akwa Ibom --------- 23.8%
11. Delta --------- 25.1%
12. Ogun --------- 26.1%
13. Kogi --------- 26.4%
14. Ondo --------- 27.9%
15. Enugu --------- 28.8%
16. Bayelsa --------- 29.0%
17. Oyo --------- 29.4%
18. Cross River --------- 33.1%
-------------------------------------------------------
** National Avg --------- 46.0%
-------------------------------------------------------
19. Plateau --------- 51.6%
20. Nassarawa --------- 52.4%
21. Ebonyi --------- 56.0%
22. Kaduna --------- 56.5%
23. Adamawa --------- 59.0%
24. Benue --------- 59.2%
25. Niger --------- 61.2%
26. Borno --------- 70.1%
27. Kano --------- 76.4%
28. Gombe --------- 76.9%
29. Taraba --------- 77.7%
30. Katsina --------- 82.2%
31. Sokoto --------- 85.3%
32. Kebbi --------- 86.0%
33. Bauchi --------- 86.6%
34. Jigawa --------- 88.4%
35. Yobe --------- 90.2%
36. Zamfara --------- 91.9%

REGIONAL AVERAGES
1 = South West - 19.3% Poverty (+ Average)
2 = South South - 25.2% Poverty (+ Average)
3 = South East - 27.36% Poverty (+ Average)

----------------------------------------------------------------------
** National Avg 46.0%% Poverty
----------------------------------------------------------------------

4 = North Central - 45.7% Poverty (+Average)
5 = North East - 76.8% Poverty (- Average)
6 = North West- 80.9% Poverty (- Average) Damn!! shocked

Sources
The Global Multidimensional Poverty Index by the U.N.Global MPI

Global MPI 2015
Country briefings
Data tables
Case studies
Methodology
Infographics
Interactive Databank
MPI Resources
FAQs
Background

Global Multidimensional Poverty Index

Click for GLOBAL MPI 2015

Visit the Global MPI 2015 pages to access a wealth of resources, including case studies, infographics and an interactive databank, as well as country profiles, policy briefings, and downloadable data tables.
What is the global MPI?

The global Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) is an international measure of acute poverty covering over 100 developing countries. It complements traditional income-based poverty measures by capturing the severe deprivations that each person faces at the same time with respect to education, health and living standards.

The MPI assesses poverty at the individual level. If someone is deprived in a third or more of ten (weighted) indicators (see left), the global index identifies them as ‘MPI poor’, and the extent – or intensity – of their poverty is measured by the number of deprivations they are experiencing.

The MPI can be used to create a comprehensive picture of people living in poverty, and permits comparisons both across countries, regions and the world and within countries by ethnic group, urban/rural location, as well as other key household and community characteristics.

This makes it invaluable as an analytical tool to identify the most vulnerable people – the poorest among the poor, revealing poverty patterns within countries and over time, enabling policy makers to target resources and design policies more effectively.

The global MPI was developed by OPHI with the UN Development Programme (UNDP) for inclusion in UNDP’s flagship Human Development Report in 2010. It has been published in the HDR ever since.http://www.ophi.org.uk/multidimensional-poverty-index/
http://www.dataforall.org/dashboard/ophi/index.php/


THIS IS FROM WORLD BANK
The NER also documents major differences in poverty and living standards by macro-region in Nigeria. While the South of Nigeria has relatively low poverty rates, ranging from 16% in the South West to 28.8% in the South East, poverty rates in the North West and North East are 45.9% and 50.2%, respectively. While the South of Nigeria (especially the South West) has experienced a strong positive dynamic in poverty reduction in recent years, the poverty rate in the North West has remained stagnant, while poverty has actually increased in the North East. Thus, disparities between the North (North West, North East) and South of Nigeria in poverty and living standards have increased. This is no doubt related to the recent security challenges in the Northern part of Nigeria. Explanatory factors for the high differences in living standards by geographical region are likely related to differences in the provision of public services and the degree of connectedness to larger markets.

NER MEANS NIGERIA ECONOMIC REPORT..maybe it is a Yoruba man that owns it...
http://www.worldbank.org/en/country/nigeria/publication/nigeria-economic-report-improved-economic-outlook-in-2014-and-prospects-for-continued-growth-look-good

THIS IS FROM NBS

Poverty was least dominant in the Southwest (49.8%), South-South (55.5%), and South-East regions (59.5%).
Read more: https://www.naij.com/401470-see-the-10-poorest-states-in-nigeria.html

SO ALL OF THEM GANGED UP TO RIDICULE UNA ...NA WAH O.ILLITERACY IS INDEED A DISEASE
THEY ARRIVED AT DIFFERENT PERCENTAGES ALL DEPICTING THAT THE SOUTH EAST IS POVERTY RIDDEN THAN SOUTH/SOUTH AND SOUTH WEST..

The more reason you all run to the best South...

Buhahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Lmaooooo

Abeg e don do

I just thank God for SW
May God continue bless our hustle

Ritchiee:
THE JOKE IS NOT ON YOU ONLY BUT THE JOKE DON CARRY YOU NACK YOU FOR GROUND COME REMOVE YOUR BRAIN PUT SAWDUST...One of the dumbest Igbos I have ever met

United Nations' Multi Dimensional Poverty Index

The United Nations' Global Multi-Dimensional Poverty Index has three dimensions and 10 indicators in estimating Overall Poverty. Each dimension is equally weighted, each indicator within a dimension is also equally weighted, and added. It uses 10 indicators to measure poverty in three dimensions: Education, Health and Living standards. This report was Published in June 2015, and is based on data collected on years between 2004 and 2014.
According to the MPI Report, as at 2010, 46% of Nigerians lived below the national poverty line (Only 28% in Urban areas, and near 70% in The rural). Although a Report by the World bank, released in 2014, showed that only 33% of Nigerians could be considered Poor.

THIS IS THE ONE FROM UNO...UNDP...OPHI COLLABORATION
States by Incidence of Poverty

STATES<-->POVERTY RATE
1. Lagos --------- 8.5%
2. Osun --------- 10.9%
3. Anambra --------- 11.2%
4. Ekiti --------- 12.9%
5. Edo --------- 19.2%
6. Imo --------- 19.8%
7. Abia --------- 21.0%
8. Rivers --------- 21.1%
*. FCT (Abj) --------- 23.5%
9. Kwara --------- 23.7%
10. Akwa Ibom --------- 23.8%
11. Delta --------- 25.1%
12. Ogun --------- 26.1%
13. Kogi --------- 26.4%
14. Ondo --------- 27.9%
15. Enugu --------- 28.8%
16. Bayelsa --------- 29.0%
17. Oyo --------- 29.4%
18. Cross River --------- 33.1%
-------------------------------------------------------
** National Avg --------- 46.0%
-------------------------------------------------------
19. Plateau --------- 51.6%
20. Nassarawa --------- 52.4%
21. Ebonyi --------- 56.0%
22. Kaduna --------- 56.5%
23. Adamawa --------- 59.0%
24. Benue --------- 59.2%
25. Niger --------- 61.2%
26. Borno --------- 70.1%
27. Kano --------- 76.4%
28. Gombe --------- 76.9%
29. Taraba --------- 77.7%
30. Katsina --------- 82.2%
31. Sokoto --------- 85.3%
32. Kebbi --------- 86.0%
33. Bauchi --------- 86.6%
34. Jigawa --------- 88.4%
35. Yobe --------- 90.2%
36. Zamfara --------- 91.9%

REGIONAL AVERAGES
1 = South West - 19.3% Poverty (+ Average)
2 = South South - 25.2% Poverty (+ Average)
3 = South East - 27.36% Poverty (+ Average)

----------------------------------------------------------------------
** National Avg 46.0%% Poverty
----------------------------------------------------------------------

4 = North Central - 45.7% Poverty (+Average)
5 = North East - 76.8% Poverty (- Average)
6 = North West- 80.9% Poverty (- Average) Damn!! shocked

Sources
The Global Multidimensional Poverty Index by the U.N
http://www.dataforall.org/dashboard/ophi/index.php/


THIS IS FROM WORLD BANK
The NER also documents major differences in poverty and living standards by macro-region in Nigeria. While the South of Nigeria has relatively low poverty rates, ranging from 16% in the South West to 28.8% in the South East, poverty rates in the North West and North East are 45.9% and 50.2%, respectively. While the South of Nigeria (especially the South West) has experienced a strong positive dynamic in poverty reduction in recent years, the poverty rate in the North West has remained stagnant, while poverty has actually increased in the North East. Thus, disparities between the North (North West, North East) and South of Nigeria in poverty and living standards have increased. This is no doubt related to the recent security challenges in the Northern part of Nigeria. Explanatory factors for the high differences in living standards by geographical region are likely related to differences in the provision of public services and the degree of connectedness to larger markets.

NER MEANS NIGERIA ECONOMIC REPORT..maybe it is a Yoruba man that owns it...
http://www.worldbank.org/en/country/nigeria/publication/nigeria-economic-report-improved-economic-outlook-in-2014-and-prospects-for-continued-growth-look-good

THIS IS FROM NBS

Poverty was least dominant in the Southwest (49.8%), South-South (55.5%), and South-East regions (59.5%).
Read more: https://www.naij.com/401470-see-the-10-poorest-states-in-nigeria.html

SO ALL OF THEM GANGED UP TO RIDICULE UNA ...NA WAH O.ILLITERACY IS INDEED A DISEASE
THEY ARRIVED AT DIFFERENT PERCENTAGES ALL DEPICTING THAT THE SOUTH EAST IS POVERTY RIDDEN THAN SOUTH/SOUTH AND SOUTH WEST..

The more reason you all run to the best South...

You must be a robot, repeating same thing all over again.

I had already shown where World bank got their figures from, and as for the OPHID, it had already been eviscerated and totally debunked here:

I have no interest going in circles with you. You can believe whatever you want to believe,but the reality remains this:: https://www.nairaland.com/2732630

SW remain the least economically viable region in the South.

It's a bitter pill you must swallow after all had been said and done.

Marcelini:


You must be a robot, repeating same thing all over again.

I had already shown where World bank got their figures from, and as for the OPHID, it had already been eviscerated and totally debunked here:

I have no interest going in circles with you. You can believe whatever you want to believe,but the reality remains this:: https://www.nairaland.com/2732630

SW remain the least economically viable region in the South.

It's a bitter pill you must swallow after all had been said and done.

As you can see from the screenshot, Internally Generated Revenue is N871.19bn and Average Monthly Revenue is 4.56bn

Meanwhile, Average Monthly Revenue supposed to equal FAAC Allocation + VAT + Internally Generated Revenue + 13% Share of Derivation

This is just an error observed by glancing through this falsified report. I'm quite sure if I peruse this propaganda, I will point out tens of errors. As you can all see, the report is probably written by an Igbo guy. Though they know how to falsify records and write propaganda, however, they are not so good in doing it because you will surely see flaws if you look well.

Can't you see that that report is flawed. Are you a robot?

" The NER then provides an updated analysis of poverty and living standards in Nigeria based on a panel survey of 5,000 households that was carried out in 2010/2011 and 2012/2013 as part of the General Household Survey of the Nigeria National Bureau of Statistics".

This is from your so called World bank stat.

weedcrusha:
Glaring error from the report our friend is quoting

As you can see from the screenshot, Internally Generated Revenue is N871.19bn and Average Monthly Revenue is 4.56bn

Meanwhile, Average Monthly Revenue supposed to equal FAAC Allocation + VAT + Internally Generated Revenue + 13% Share of Derivation

This is just an error observed by glancing through this falsified report. I'm quite sure if I peruse this propaganda, I will point out tens of errors. As you can all see, the report is probably written by an Igbo guy. Though they know how to falsify records and write propaganda, however, they are not so good in doing it because you will surely see flaws if you look well.

Can you imagine

Yourbudgit.com instead of yourbudget?

Ibo, aba made stats

Lmaooooo

Aba made can easily be detected .

weedcrusha:


As you can see from the screenshot, Internally Generated Revenue is N871.19bn and Average Monthly Revenue is 4.56bn

Meanwhile, Average Monthly Revenue supposed to equal FAAC Allocation + VAT + Internally Generated Revenue + 13% Share of Derivation

This is just an error observed by glancing through this falsified report. I'm quite sure if I peruse this propaganda, I will point out tens of errors. As you can all see, the report is probably written by an Igbo guy. Though they know how to falsify records and write propaganda, however, they are not so good in doing it because you will surely see flaws if you look well.

Can't you see that that report is flawed. Are you a robot?

You are not making any sense!

The report wasn't prepared by an Igbo.

Marcelini:


You are not making any sense!

The report wasn't prepared by an Igbo.

And why is it only on Anambra that he made that unforgivable error. As a matter of fact, not only is the guy an Igbo guy, he must be an Anambra guy

totit:



Buhahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Lmaooooo

Abeg e don do

I just thank God for SW
May God continue bless our hustle

That is it superman.HE HAS BEEN THOROUGHLY DECIMATED
I.E.D

totit:




Can you imagine

Yourbudgit.com instead of yourbudget?

Ibo, aba made stats

Lmaooooo

Aba made can easily be detected .

They know how to lie, but they surely don't know how to cover their lies. All you have to do is to scrutinise their lies, and see everything crumble down.

Marcelini:


You must be a robot, repeating same thing all over again.

I had already shown where World bank got their figures from, and as for the OPHID, it had already been eviscerated and totally debunked here:

I have no interest going in circles with you. You can believe whatever you want to believe,but the reality remains this:: https://www.nairaland.com/2732630

SW remain the least economically viable region in the South.

It's a bitter pill you must swallow after all had been said and done.

Look who is talking about robots...lol I didn't know I had been chatting with a cyborg.You should make a book on learning how to be a complete moro.n someday...
If everybody is lying and realities on ground like SW being the most industrialised,most educated,having the largest middle class and being the commercial hub of Nigeria are all not satisfactory enough reasons for you why they tower over the SE,then you console yourself.I know it is hard but you just have to swallow the bitter pill of defeat.That is the reality...kpele.

weedcrusha:


And why is it only on Anambra that he made that unforgivable error. As a matter of fact, not only is the guy an Igbo guy, he must be an Anambra guy

You need your head examined, it's obvious that figure is in millions and not billions, a simple summation of that IGR with the VAT and FAAC gives 4.56 billion which is the average monthly allocation of Anambra state. The mistake of writing 871.19 million as 871.19 billions was an obvious typo that had no effect on the final result of 4.56billion. The joke is on you.

2.94 billion( FAAC) + 753.10 million( VAT) + 871.19 million( IGR) = 4.56 billion( average monthly allocation)

The writing of the IGR as 871.19 billion instead of 871.19 million is an obvious typo that had no influence in the final result of 4.56 billion.

The joke is on you, simple arithmetics, you still don't know.

weedcrusha:


They know how to lie, but they surely don't know how to cover their lies. All you have to do is to scrutinise their lies, and see everything crumble down.

*Falls from chair*
Haha haha haha
I beg e don do jare