Ishilove:

Try Florence Ita-Giwa

mr1759:
I took a look at the screen shot,

1) I saw blue Cloth in all the different pix taken differently

2) I saw the same corner of chair or bed all through the different pix

3) then I saw the same brightness and exposure in all the photo

4) in pix that look the same but the girl pix keep changing

inclusion it is a fake picture from a frustrated LovePeddler girl

motherfucker:
You all APC dogs will perish in diappointment... that scandal aint flying. Try another one please.

Chiefpriest1:
Seriously, I have read up every bit of information on this issue I could lay my hands, yet the more I read, the more I am convinced that this young woman has no case.

I concede that the devil can tempt anybody, but Apostle Suleiman, who I consider intelligent enough would not throw everything away, including what he stands for just because of this not-so-attractive woman.

Her case is just so watery. Point one: Suleiman has a 4-year-old boy, yet this girl says the pastor wanted her hand in marriage because he wanted more boys.

If someone always said all children are children, male or female, when he didn't have male children, is it now that he has one that he will throw everything away in the name of looking for male children?

Suleiman, I am sure, is exposed enough to know that a woman alone does not determine the sex of a baby or that a girl's face does not show whether she will have plenty male children in her body.

Point two: she says Suleiman already visited her father for introduction, yet her father has denied that.

Point three: He impregnated her and gave her concoction to drink. I want children, yet I gave you concoction to drink when I discovered you were pregnant.

Point four: she released pictures of their video chat. That nonsense does not mean sh*t. If we agree that that man was Suleiman, is it now a crime to chat on video. What was being discussed? Again, it could have been manipulated.

Point five: On a normal day, I don't have an inch of the fame, money and public scrutiny that Suleiman has. Yet, I won't even approach this babe when I am sober. Unless maybe I don shack and I no see road for club.

Point six: I am not the type to be blinded by religion, but I know Suleiman is a philanthropist. The guy can even sell his trouser to help people. I have personal friends that he has helped sort out their rent and stuff. So, that he paid money into the girl's account twice does not make him complicit.

Point seven: you said Suleiman proposed marriage. Didn't you even reason what will happen to the wife in the has in the house? Or was she preparing to become a second wife to a pastor? The Man's pictures with his wife are everywhere. So, she cannot claim ignorance.


However, I am not closing my mind to further evidence. Let her release everything in her arsenal and let people make up their mind. But for now, she sincerely doesn't have a case.

mr1759:
I took a look at the screen shot,

1) I saw blue Cloth in all the different pix taken differently

2) I saw the same corner of chair or bed all through the different pix

3) then I saw the same brightness and exposure in all the photo

4) in pix that look the same but the girl pix keep changing

inclusion it is a fake picture from a frustrated LovePeddler girl

Astuteleader:
But this girl is ugly

Astuteleader:
But this girl is ugly

WeNoGoDie:


You said "the only obvious truth" is that there once existed a relationship.

I like working with facts and not assumption, can you please enlighten us on what makes for this "obvious truth" cos that's the MISSING LINK everybody is trying to find to seal a final conclusion that there was indeed a relationship.

As I observed earlier, a relationship that intimate should have at least a real picture or video proof.

xynerise:
Did you guys notice the boobs in the Snapchat videos is different from reality?

kayo80:


Dude, go and watch her music video on YouTube. The girl was very fleshy and busty till Suleiman poisoned her drink a couple of months ago. Watch her video interview from after she was released from court. She speaks on it.

xynerise:




They have started again

factwriter:



your analysis are correct. What I think though is that FACTS are being mixed with FICTIONS from both side.

While the lady maybe (unintelligently) making up other issues like the traditional marriage and pregnancy to seal his coffin, there seems to have truly existed, a relationship.

.. the Pastor on the other hand could be trying to use the "blackmail accusation" as a defence to disperse this truly once existed relationship.

in other words, they could both be presently lying. That is, the only obvious truth (so far) is that there once EXISTED A RELATIONSHIP which doesn't seem to have ended well.

any other talk na addition and subtraction.

iswallker:
[s][/s]

men tell ladies anything just to get in their pants including saying he wants more male children...

she doesnt seem in good terms with her biological father, she could have hired a father for that occasion...its left for her to show us who took part in the introduction. however am sure keyamo will not be dumb not to see photos and take the brief..

he impregnated her and gave her concoction. is it impossible? again men tell ladies countless lies just to keep having access...

if we agree that the man is suleiman... are you for real. of course hes the one, at least until he can use a face recognition software to disprove that in court...

you wont approach the babe...keep deceiving the gullible... ...whats wrong with the girl. shes the type of gal that can make one do things you dont want to do..also, she has the physical features to easily achieve her goals...

you wont approach is story for the gods...

philanthropy indeed...hes making personal transfers to a babes acct...is that how a man of god operates...what happened to the welfare unit in his organization? why cant they handle such requests for assistance...?

if you want to straf a gal, a matured lady, you always promise her marriage. its not a new thing bro.

my advice to you is not to preempt the outcome of this developing case...depending on the preponderance of evidence that will be presented and who does a better job at convincing the judge, it could go any direction.....

seunlayi:
Let call a spade a spade. Something truly happened between them. The man of God is trying to cover up

seunlayi:
Let call a spade a spade. Something truly happened between them. The man of God is trying to cover up

Ishilove:

The fact is the story is as stinky as a rotten fish and she will be disgraced last last

seunlayi:
Let call a spade a spade. Something truly happened between them. The man of God is trying to cover up

seunlayi:
Let call a spade a spade. Something truly happened between them. The man of God is trying to cover up

WeNoGoDie:
I don't trust a lot of pastors but many factors seems to make Ms Otobo's claims questionable which people hardly seem to notice:

1. The lady claims there was a kind of introduction/traditional marriage. This is one area her claims flaws greatly. Someone as well known as Pastor Sulaiman cannot do a traditional marriage without it hitting blogs and evening newspapers at least. Someone among the attendees will certainly leak it.

2. Traditional marriage of that caliber must evidently have at least a picture or video.

3. A relationship that intimate as the girl claims should at least have one picture of the two together in loved up postures and not just a snapchat photoshop that says nothing.

4. The girls dad totally denied her claims even when she involved her dad in her video testimony.

5. How come all these things are happening at a time some powerful folks are after the downfall of the pastor.

6. No fake Nigerian pastor will want to divorce his wife and marry a stripper because in an effort to hide their hypocrisy there are certain things they wouldn't publicly do.


All I'm simply saying is that the girls stories do not add up at all. Even when you listen to her video testimony, the way she's stuttering and fumbling and her lack of cordination easily showcases an individual trying hard to arrange lies.

However I always leave a room for doubt if I hear stories like this in case I'm wrong.

Nellybii:


You are a learner!!
How many men carry aristo and snap pictures?
Sorry. Obviously you don't know shit.. Only people that know can explain better.

chiabahi:
i thought Nigeria police said bail is FREE, why charging #100K. Dis country self....

neocortex:

It doesn't matter whether you trust a pastor or not, all allegations must be analysed on a case by case basis.



Men who cheat don't announce their escapades on newspaper, it is done secretly.
Mind you it was an introduction not marriage and any meeting between a potential
inlaw and any member of the wife's family can be tagged an "introduction" , not
necessarily a ceremony.



Again, you are arguing a non-existent point that there was a marriage. No where did the girl claim that they
were married, it was an introduction!


Isn't it obvious that their relationship were mostly virtual and any
meeting that takes place must be very discreet. Remember the girl knows he already
has a wife. Only a dumb celebrity will leave behind a clear cheating evidence.


The girl dad is an absentee dad who is still bitter at his ex-wife, hence his attempt to ruin her
and the daughter close to her. The swiftness of the dad's testimony is an indication of a man
who has a score to settle or has been recruited just for that purpose.


Coincidence is never an evidence in any rational argument.


He was lying like some dishonest men do, they promise heaven and earth but they deliver nothing.
This is nothing new, am surprised you don't know this.



A clear coordinated testimony would have point to a scripted event. If I am to talk of the relationship
with my friend it will never be smooth. All that matters is that the testimony is not contradictory and
consistent, not the delivery. Sitting down to write about something is quite different from telling it
as a story.



Well, that is the right thing to do.

Edelweiss44:


I have asked you before and you dodged the question; Pls tell us where in African culture you know it happens that a man can say he has gone for introduction without meeting the girl's father if he is alive or somebody delegated by the girl's father to represent him if for whatever reason the girl's father is indisposed? Where does it happen!!!!

This girl's father has openly denied ever meeting the Apostle how much more receiving him for his daughter's marriage introduction, yet you come here to tell us the man is lying. Do you know the man before? Do you know Stephanie before? Do you know Apostle Suleiman before? And you are here to tell us stephanie's father is lying?? Do you know the man's daughter more than him? You see, when I tell you that you are either dumb or filled with stupid blind hatred for pastors you will think I'm just insulting you whereas I'm merely telling you a simple fact!

neocortex:

It doesn't matter whether you trust a pastor or not, all allegations must be analysed on a case by case basis.



Men who cheat don't announce their escapades on newspaper, it is done secretly.
Mind you it was an introduction not marriage and any meeting between a potential
inlaw and any member of the wife's family can be tagged an "introduction" , not
necessarily a ceremony.



Again, you are arguing a non-existent point that there was a marriage. No where did the girl claim that they
were married, it was an introduction!


Isn't it obvious that their relationship were mostly virtual and any
meeting that takes place must be very discreet. Remember the girl knows he already
has a wife. Only a dumb celebrity will leave behind a clear cheating evidence.


The girl dad is an absentee dad who is still bitter at his ex-wife, hence his attempt to ruin her
and the daughter close to her. The swiftness of the dad's testimony is an indication of a man
who has a score to settle or has been recruited just for that purpose.


Coincidence is never an evidence in any rational argument.


He was lying like some dishonest men do, they promise heaven and earth but they deliver nothing.
This is nothing new, am surprised you don't know this.



A clear coordinated testimony would have point to a scripted event. If I am to talk of the relationship
with my friend it will never be smooth. All that matters is that the testimony is not contradictory and
consistent, not the delivery. Sitting down to write about something is quite different from telling it
as a story.



Well, that is the right thing to do.

mr1759:
I took a look at the screen shot,

1) I saw blue Cloth in all the different pix taken differently

2) I saw the same corner of chair or bed all through the different pix

3) then I saw the same brightness and exposure in all the photo

4) in pix that look the same but the girl pix keep changing

inclusion it is a fake picture from a frustrated LovePeddler girl