KingEbukasBlog:


So what's the difference between the 'deist God' and 'Christian God' ?

KingEbukasBlog:


So what's the difference between the 'deist God' and 'Christian God' ?

felixomor:


If they ask you to show proof for this now,
U will start answering question with question.....

Mscheww

Kay17:


The typical skeptic's response is whether all things that are organized and ordered must come from a creator as an absolute rule. Now if it is not then you have to mention the exceptions.

However if it is an absolute rule then God himself for being supremely ordered and organized cannot escape his need of a creator.

Again the absolute rule would be useless and absurd if it creates an infinite chain of cause and effect.

davtosh:


Do u mean it could have as well been created by aliens?

If that is the case you at least believe it was created by someone you only cant take it that God created it.

dalaman:


The deist God is a creator God/force that doesn't intervene(mighteven be dead), while the Christian God is the one that is supposed to actively intervene in people's lives, answer prayes, speaks with them, is in a personal relationship with them, loves them and the other hogwash that christianity is associated with.

We can simply test that. You do not communicate with any God in reality, you can ONLY CLAIM that you do, but in reality you are only deluding yourself. If you insist you do then we can test it very easily and you'll see that you will always fail the test.

Immorttal:
its been long i come across this model of thought, its thought-hassling

KingEbukasBlog:


What is this ?

How can a necessarily existing , non contingent immutable being die ? Anything that could kill God is greater than He is but God is eternal (no, beginning , no end ) omnipotent and supreme so that's impossible . Death is a change and God is impervious to change since He is changeless (immutable) . I mean sir Dalaman , it is very illogical to even surmise that God is dead or will die .

KingEbukasBlog:


It was easily debunked bro . Long time sef , how you dey ?

KingEbukasBlog:


Being maximally great means that God is Omnipotent , Omniscient , morally perfect , Omnipresent etc . And God being simple is that these attributes are not parts of God that make Him God , they are simply identical to His being .You dig ?

KingEbukasBlog:


Wow . How is that possible please explain . And after you are done , select which you think is logical

1. Infinite Regress

2. First Cause [Eternal , Necessary Existent , Self Existent, Self Sufficient , Non Contingent ]

3. Something out of literally nothing uncaused .

Kay17:


The typical skeptic's response is whether all things that are organized and ordered must come from a creator as an absolute rule. Now if it is not then you have to mention the exceptions.

However if it is an absolute rule then God himself for being supremely ordered and organized cannot escape his need of a creator.

Again the absolute rule would be useless and absurd if it creates an infinite chain of cause and effect.

owoleola:
A conscious mind must have been the mastermind of an organized or ordered thing,well that does rule out the idea that the world just came into existence without no cause.And also this is where my dogma comes in,because I believe in God,He Himself wasn't created.

Kay17:


This is begging the question. Why would i agree with you that God is the first cause or that something came out of nothing uncaused when in principle i do not accept the assumptions for such.

Kay17:


The word you searching for in substitute of simple is whole. If an entity is indivisible then it's whole.

In my belief, maximal greatness involves an advanced stage of complexity

KingEbukasBlog:


Again , can you list out the parts of God and name the function of each part

dalaman:


Do you communicate with God?

KingEbukasBlog:


Yes

JackBizzle:



A deist god is not a personal god and has no relationship per se with humans. a deist god does not have any spiritual powers and does not require worship.

The christian god requires worship, submission and spirituality.

dalaman:


You mean you communicate with your God the way you communicate with me? Back and forth?

Kay17:


In a debate personal beliefs are helpless in persuasion. Of what use would my dogma be to you. Except we have a common ground that reason would lead us to finding the truth, right?

KingEbukasBlog:


Back and forth ? For me , I don't think I've attained that level . But God does communicate with me .

dalaman:


How does God communicate with you if its not back and forth?

KingEbukasBlog:
m

If by back and forth you mean conversation , then no . Prayer is a form of communication and God responds to my requests .

KingEbukasBlog:


There is no begging the question here . I listed three possibilities and asked you for the logical one . 'God' is the appellation for the First Cause . In case you believe the universe is the First Cause , then you are wrong : the universe does have not properties of the First Cause - the exact opposite in fact .

KingEbukasBlog:


You got most of it wrong . There are different types of deism - I've mentioned them before - and each type have different beliefs . Some deists say that God does require worship and can have both a transpersonal (Panendeism) and personal relationship with man . In Spiritual Deism , man is expected to both believe in a personal God and have a spiritual relationship with God .

KingEbukasBlog:
m

If by back and forth you mean conversation , then no . Prayer is a form of communication and God responds to my requests .

Frenzy007:
lol plz tell me which prayer dat u have prayed dat ur imaginary God answered

JackBizzle:



As a christian, should you be LYING DURING EASTER?

Deism does not require worship. Even the pandeism you mentioned does not include a God that requires worshiping!

Kay17:


Cause and effect relationship relies on a physical principle observable within our universe. Why do you believe such a principle must extend beyond this universe?

KingEbukasBlog:

The deists deduced that God indeed exists based on reason , why do you as an atheist contravene their conclusion ? To the logical profound deist , the existence of God is true . Why do you then impugn the truth ?

dalaman:


How does God respond to your request? Give me an example of God's response to you that you know can not be any other phenomenon but God.