Nodogragra4me:




I know you don't know anything.... Just an ignoramus being led by the nose ....Here is an extract for you .. when you become mature enough you will ask for history of what you profess


Having gained full citizenship in the pagan Roman Empire in A.D. 212 under the Edict of Caracalla, the Jews became second-class citizens and the object of increasing persecution after the emperor, Constantine, supposedly became a Christian. Thereafter, it was those who called themselves Christians who were far more cruel to the Jews than pagans had ever been. The Roman Catholic popes were the first to develop anti-Semitism to a science. Hitler, who remained a Catholic to the end, would claim that he was only following the example of both Catholics and Lutherans in finishing what the Church had begun.



Anti-Semitism was a part of his Catholicism from which Martin Luther was never freed. He advocated burning down Jews' homes and giving them the choice between conversion and having their tongues torn out.1 When Rome's Jews were released from their ghetto by the Italian army in 1870, their freedom at last ended about 1500 years of unimaginable humiliation and degradation at the hands of those who claimed to be the vicars of Christ. No pope hated Jews more than Paul IV (1555-59), whose cruelties defy the bounds of human reason. Catholic historian Peter de Rosa confesses that a whole "succession of popes reinforced the ancient prejudices against Jews, treating them as lepers unworthy of the protection of the law. Pius VII [ 1800-23] was followed by Leo XII, Pius VIII, Gregory XVI, Pius IX [1846-78]all good pupils of Paul IV."2 Historian Will Durant reminds us that Hitler had good precedent for his sanctions against the Jews: The [Roman Catholic] Council of Vienne (1311) forbade all intercourse between Christians and Jews. The Council of Zamora (1313) ruled that they must be kept in strict subjection and servitude. The Council of Basel (1431-33) renewed canonical decrees forbidding Christians to associate with Jews ... and instructed secular authorities [as the church had herself long enforced in Rome and the papal states] to confine the Jews in separate quarters [ghettos], compel them to wear a distinguishing badge [it had previously been a yellow hat], and ensure their attendance at sermons aimed to convert them.

Nodogragra4me:


There have been 2000 years of tension and antagonism between Rome and Jerusalem. For nearly 46 years after Israel's rebirth in 1948 the Vatican refused to acknowledge her right to exist. That animosity has not been erased by the recent overtures which the Vatican has found it expedient to make toward Israel. Rome wants to influence the future of Jerusalem, which she still insists must be an international city over which Israel will have no more say than any other nation.

wth28:
I will die like the dog of Ogun bleeding from the nose and anus

Nodogragra4me:


The poverty and instability that has plagued Latin America resulted from the union between church and state and the power over government which Rome, having enjoyed in Europe for centuries, brought to the new world in the name of Christ. The Roman clergy were like little gods lording it over the natives, who became their servants. The revolutions in Latin American countries have been in large measure created by the contrast between the poverty of the people and the wealth of the Roman Catholic Church and the evil dictatorships it supported. Liberation Theology was spawned in Latin America by radical Catholic priests and nuns whose aroused consciences could no longer justify the oppression of the masses by both Church and state.

Nodogragra4me:



Moreover, for more than a thousand years the Roman Catholic Church exercised both religious and civil control over the entire city of Rome and its surroundings. Pope Innocent III (11981216) abolished the secular Roman Senate and placed the administration of Rome directly under his command. The Roman Senate that had governed the city under the Caesars had been known as the Curia Romana (Roman Curia). That name, according to the Pocket Catholic Dictionary, is now the designation of "the whole ensemble of administrative and judicial offices through which the Pope directs the operations of the Catholic Church."6 The popes' authority even extended to large territories outside Rome acquired in the eighth century. At that time, with the help of a deliberately fraudulent document manufactured for the popes known as The Donation of Constantine, Pope Stephen III convinced Pepin, king of the Franks and father of Charlemagne, that territories recently taken by the Lombards from the Byzantines actually had been given to the papacy by the Emperor Constantine. Pepin routed the Lombards and handed to the pope the keys to some 20 cities (Ravenna, Ancona, Bologna, Ferrara, lesi, Gubbio, etc.) and the huge chunk of land joining them along the Adriatic coast. Dated 30 March 315, The Donation declared that Constantine had given these lands, along with Rome and the Lateran Palace, to the popes in perpetuity. In 1440 this document was proven to be a forgery by Lorenzo Valla, a papal aide, and is so recognized by historians today. Yet allegedly infallible popes continued for centuries to assert that The Donation was genuine and on that basis to justify their pomp, power, and possessions. That fraud is still perpetuated by an inscription in the baptistry of Rome's St. John Lateran, which has never been corrected. Thus the Papal States were literally stolen by the popes from their rightful owners. The papacy controlled and taxed these territories and derived great wealth from them until 1848. At that time the pope, along with the rulers of most of the other divided territories of Italy, was forced to grant his rebellious subjects a constitution

Lalas247:


Lambo gini it’s ok ... I don’t need it very much content

Make sure you eat that garri with suya ! That’s How I like it

Hope I’m free ...

jagugu88li:
Let the Pope "charitize" his golden stick, the swiss bank accout, the golden chairs and all inside the vetican then we can later talk of charity. Pretenders everywhere

iLUMeN8:


One more thing, NO more RCG for him, that tot almost made me choke on my garri A few days ago...

I need your bank details . Send me a PM.

okay bye

Nodogragra4me:


The Roman Catholic Church, however, has insisted upon celibacy even though many popes, among them Sergius III (904-11), John X (914-28), John XII (955-63), Benedict V (964), Innocent VIII (1484-92), Urban VIII (1623-44), and Innocent X (1644-55), as well as millions of cardinals, bishops, archbishops, monks, and priests throughout history, have repeatedly violated such vows. Not only has celibacy made sinners of the clergy who engage in fornication, but it makes harlots out of those with whom they secretly cohabit. Rome is indeed "the mother of harlots"! Her identification as such is unmistakable. No other city, church, or institution in the history of the world is her rival in this particular evil. History is replete with sayings that mocked the church's false claim to celibacy and revealed the truth: "The holiest hermit has his LovePeddler" and "Rome has more prostitutes than any other city because she has the most celibates" are examples. Pius II declared that Rome was "the only city run by bastards" [sons of popes and cardinals]. Catholic historian and former Jesuit Peter de Rosa writes: Popes had mistresses of fifteen years of age, were guilty of incest and sexual perversions of every sort, had innumerable children, were murdered in the very act of adultery [by jealous husbands who found them in bed with their wives].... In the old Catholic phrase, why be holier than the pope?

wth28:

I am not trying to convert anyone neither am i trying to educate but i am here to make a statement Just the same reason you are here

wth28:

Jesus are you kidding me 2 billion People, You must be proud of that lie you composed

SkydaDGreat:

See the words of a Christian ....i doubt if you are.
Later you will be claiming na you know pass. it is your type that will quote Bible from Genesis to revelation, that will go to church pass

Shaking my head for you.
Change your ways of give your life to Christ.

TANTUMERGO007:
Our pastors should learn


May devil punish oyedipo and adebayo for using the poor sweat to buy jets and properties in their name while telling their gullible followers to save for treasures in heaven. Useless criminals

Nodogragra4me:


I am not a sheeple like you. I know the catholic church history better than you ..I have collection upon collection even into the modem day and they are not idle .I read them

If your pope wants to show live ,the should start by apologising to the million the church murder and confiscated their property and then use the trillion dollar artifacts to set up free universities in every city of the word where those atrocities took place

ammyluv2002:
Wow! I'm super proud of the Pope! This is what Christianity should be!

I pray the General Overseers should learn from this man!

sureheaven:
Pope na gbaladun, Imam na enjoyment in fela's voice

Ubenedictus:
sorry dear, I'm not a sheeple, I know the Church established by Christ, the Catholic Church, I know the good she has done in the world and the atrocities some of her ministers have committed in her name. I also know that even through those bad minister God has not abandoned his Church and has continued to sanctify her through those centuries. the gates of hell tried but didn't prevail.



my question still remains what stolen artifacts are you talking about?

Ubenedictus:
sorry dear, I'm not a sheeple, I know the Church established by Christ, the Catholic Church, I know the good she has done in the world and the atrocities some of her ministers have committed in her name. I also know that even through those bad minister God has not abandoned his Church and has continued to sanctify her through those centuries. the gates of hell tried but didn't prevail.



my question still remains what stolen artifacts are you talking about?

Fourwinds:
where is the sense in this....a proof

Nodogragra4me:


The poverty and instability that has plagued Latin America resulted from the union between church and state and the power over government which Rome, having enjoyed in Europe for centuries, brought to the new world in the name of Christ. The Roman clergy were like little gods lording it over the natives, who became their servants. The revolutions in Latin American countries have been in large measure created by the contrast between the poverty of the people and the wealth of the Roman Catholic Church and the evil dictatorships it supported. Liberation Theology was spawned in Latin America by radical Catholic priests and nuns whose aroused consciences could no longer justify the oppression of the masses by both Church and state.

Ubenedictus:
where is the stolen artifacts.

you like to scatter talk but won't answer simple questions.

Ubenedictus:
sorry dear, I'm not a sheeple, I know the Church established by Christ, the Catholic Church, I know the good she has done in the world and the atrocities some of her ministers have committed in her name. I also know that even through those bad minister God has not abandoned his Church and has continued to sanctify her through those centuries. the gates of hell tried but didn't prevail.



my question still remains what stolen artifacts are you talking about?

Ubenedictus:
sorry dear, I'm not a sheeple, I know the Church established by Christ, the Catholic Church, I know the good she has done in the world and the atrocities some of her ministers have committed in her name. I also know that even through those bad minister God has not abandoned his Church and has continued to sanctify her through those centuries. the gates of hell tried but didn't prevail.



my question still remains what stolen artifacts are you talking about?

Nodogragra4me:


It took centuries of developing ingenious arguments to finally arrive at the theory that the Christ who had "nowhere to lay his head" (Matthew 8:20), who lived in poverty and was crucified naked, was to be represented by a regal pontiff who possessed more than one palace containing in excess of 1100 rooms each, was waited upon day and night by scores of servants, and wore the finest gold-embroidered silk robes! That Christ passed on to Peter such pomp and luxuries, which neither of them knew, is both ludicrous and blasphemous. The glories and powers enjoyed by popes are not even remotely related to Peter's life of purity and poverty. This fisherman-apostle said, "Silver and gold have I none" (Acts 3:6). Nor were papal luxuries and pompous claims of authority over kings and kingdoms known in the Church until centuries later as ambitious popes gradually extended and solidified their authority and control over earthly rulers. Po

Nodogragra4me:



Keep receiving yourself ...Christ establish a criminal hang that is yet to apologise to their victims even today

Contrary to what Roman Catholics are taught, the papal office did not originate with Peter. It was centuries before the Bishop of Rome attempted to dominate the rest of the Church, and many centuries more before this primacy was generally accepted. Leo the Great's letter to Flavian in 449 was not accepted until the Council of Chalcedon had approved it. "[Pope] Leo [I] himself acknowledged that his treatise could not become a rule of faith till it was confirmed by the bishops."11 There were eight councils of the Church before the schism in 1054 split it into Roman Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy, when the Bishop of Rome and the Patriarch of Constantinople excommunicated each other. None of these eight councils was called by the Bishop of Rome, but by the emperor, who also put his stamp of approval upon their decrees. As for papal authority, one Catholic historian reminds us: Pope Pelagius (556-60) talks of heretics separating themselves from the Apostolic Sees, that is, Rome, Jerusalem, Alexandria plus Constantinople. In all the early writings of the hierarchy there is no mention of a special role for the Bishop of Rome, nor yet the special name of `Pope.' . . . Of the eighty or so heresies in the first six centuries, not one refers to the authority of the Bishop of Rome, not one is settled by the Bishop of Rome.... No one attacks the [supreme] authority of the Roman pontiff, because no one has heard of it.
12 The Easter Synod of 680 called by Pope Agatho was the first ecclesiastical body that asserted the primacy of Rome over the rest of the Church, but this was not an ecumenical council of the entire Church, so its decision was not generally accepted. As Catholic historian Peter de Rosa points out:

Ubenedictus:

in case you are ignorant the Church has apologized for whatever atrocities some of her ministers may have committed in her name.


your long post above only proves that the early Church is the Catholic Church and the Protestant enterprise is a new invention.
funny enough every ancient Church even the Orthodox Church agrees that the office of the pope comes from Peter and the Roman Church has primacy.

you still haven't been able to show the so-called stolen artifacts.

Ubenedictus:

in case you are ignorant the Church has apologized for whatever atrocities some of her ministers may have committed in her name.


your long post above only proves that the early Church is the Catholic Church and the Protestant enterprise is a new invention.
funny enough every ancient Church even the Orthodox Church agrees that the office of the pope comes from Peter and the Roman Church has primacy.

you still haven't been able to show the so-called stolen artifacts.