Thierry Henry, spent his years from childhood developing his skills to be one of the greatest footballers ever. He married an unknown, unheard of, struggling model.

4 years later she asks for a divorce and got £10m out or his £25m wealth. 40%!

For doing effing nada. Money she could not earn.

Sagamite:

Thierry Henry, spent his years from childhood developing his skills to be one of the greatest footballer ever. He married an unknown, unheard of, struggling model.

4 years later she asks for a divorce and got £10m out or his £25m wealth. 40%!

For doing effing nada. Money she could not earn.

That's what he gets for being a goat., Not a coincidence that most of the ones that go thru this arent married to black women. Since he wanted a fancy model so bad, good for him 

I have no pity for any rich celeb with no contract in place, not sure why you guys dey cry tears on their behalf.

Still another celeb

Smartly dressed Claire, who comes from Croydon, was said to be initially demanding a £10million settlement based on the French player’s £130,000-a week earnings.
This included money from his ad deals with Pringles and McDonald's and a cut of the £5.9million marital home in Hampstead, North London.
But the 27-year-old eventually accepted £8million to end their messy divorce battle.

Claire was granted a quickie divorce in September last years on the grounds of the Henry's 'unreasonable behaviour', after he was linked to make-up artist Sadie Hewlett.
It was claimed that Claire found text messages to another woman on the Barcelona star's mobile phone


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1110362/Now-know-Thierry-Henrys-ex-wife-spending-8m-divorce-settlement--VERY-posh-underwear.html#ixzz1HkAV3JrT

Please this is getting boring
U all say that there shd be a settlement but there shd be a cap right?
ok y dont u prepare a pettion for a class action so as to cause a change in these law so as to protect ur wealth fro mur would be wives

PHEW

@Sagamite. . . At this point, i think it's safe to say it's pointless bantering with these women. The system is aimed at benefiting them and even when they know the truth of this injustice, they will defend the anomaly by regurgitating all they've been brainwashed via the media and feminazi progandadists. A wise man once said "women and logic don't mix". The kind of comments on this thread says it all. The same women defending the system would feel different if their brother,son or close relative was affected. And there's a dumb hypocritical bimbo here talking about hypocrisy as if she knows the meaning of the word.

guys if the thing dey vex una

make una marry rich heiress

paris dey, walmart pikin, for here sef babangida grand daughters dey
u sef go collect settlement

seriously, a story on galimony

http://abcnews.go.com/Business/role-reversal-wives-angry-paying-alimony/story?id=8662940
http://abcnews.go.com/Business/role-reversal-wives-angry-paying-alimony/story?id=8662940

Role Reversal: Ex-Wives Angry Over Paying Alimony
Long a Gripe of Divorced Men, More Women Feel Burdened by Spousal Support

By ALICE GOMSTYN
ABC NEWS Business Unit
Sept.30, 2009—

He got their second house, an investment property she had bought in Costa Rica, and a $96,000 annual alimony payment.

She got angry.

"It's so obscene," said Holly Chiancola, 52, a Gloucester, Mass. real estate agent who is fighting the terms of a divorce settlement ordered by a judge in 2006.

You used to hear about divorced men complaining that their ex-wives were unfairly cutting into their income. Now, as more women become primary breadwinners, the complaints increasingly come from them. The number of American men receiving alimony has climbed, from 7,000 in 1998 to 13,000 last year, according to U.S. Census Bureau data

Chiancola's ex, who declined to comment for this story, is among them.

Thanks in part to the pre-financial crisis real estate boom, Chiancola earned considerably more than her ex-husband, a sometime carpenter and fashion model, during their 19-year-marriage. She said her ex didn't hesitate to take advantage of that -- even though her income plummeted after the real estate boom years, and she's now struggling to make her mortgage payments.

Chiancola said she partly blames Massachusetts' "outdated" divorce laws for her predicament -- she is a supporter of the group Mass Alimony Reform -- but she's also plenty outraged at her husband.

"He went for the jugular, believe me," she said.

Aggressive pursuit of spousal support by men is becoming more common, some divorce lawyers say, as the stigma of asking for alimony fades.

"Early on, men were somewhat embarrassed to ask for alimony because it went across their defined roles in the culture. That has diminished," said Marlene Moses, the president-elect of the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers, an organization of family law attorneys. "There's been a revolution of men and their rights and the vigor with which they pursue legal opportunities for themselves."

It's a revolution, experts say, that has been going on for more than 20 years -- actress Joan Collins' divorce and alimony case made headlines in the 1980s -- but today, it's still catching some women off guard.

Take Terry, a 56-year-old Florida healthcare executive, who asked to have her last name witheld because her divorce from her husband is not yet settled.

"He's a very independent man, a very macho guy, and I was quite surprised that he would ask for alimony," said Terry.

Alimony Ex-Husband: 'I Helped Her'

Terry said her soon-to-be ex is asking for $2,500 per month in alimomy -- and she's fighting it.

Terry, who earns more than $100,000 a year, said she's not against the principle of women paying alimony to their former spouses. But in her case, she said, it's not warranted. Her husband was laid off from an $85,000 per year job several months ago, but "he's completely capable of earning a living."

For some men, just as with some women, it's past experience, not future earning potential, that weighs heavily on their decisions to seek alimony. One divorced New England man told ABCNews.com that he deserved tens of thousands in alimony payments because he played a key role in his ex-wife's professional success.

"I helped her out in the background," said the man, who asked that his name be withheld due to ongoing divorce proceedings. Without him, he said, "there's absolutely no way she could have done what she did."

Despite the increases in men seeking and receiving alimony, advocates warn against linking the trend to equality in the courtroom. Family court judges still tend to favor women, said Ned Holstein, the founder of Fathers & Families, a group advocating family court reform.

"Family court still gives custody overwhelmingly to mothers, child support overwhelmingly to mothers, and courts still give almony overwhelmingly to mothers and women," he said.

"The family courts came into existence years ago in order to give things to mothers that mothers needed," he said. "The times have changed and the courts have not."

Recession Brings More Male Alimony?

Today's economy may be adding new men to ranks of alimony-seekers. As traditionally male-dominated industries like finance and construction continue to struggle, more men are finding themselves with lower income or no income at all, forcing a newfound dependence on their wives or, in some cases, ex-wives.

Earlier this year, a British judge ruled that Elena Bowes Marano should pay her ex, real estate tycoon Peter Marano, 5 million pounds (about $8 million) after his property portfolio dwindled in value -- an order that Elena, originally from a wealthy California family, is fighting.

Such cases notwithstanding, a reversal of traditional gender roles in a divorce doesn't necessarily create more acrimony, experts say.

Alexis Martin Neely, a prominent California family lawyer, is an alimony-paying woman content with her divorce settlement. Supporting her husband, she has said, allows him to spend time with their children.

"I do really like him being available for the kids and their school events and if he can't work and do that, I'd rather support him to be readily available for them," she wrote in a blog post. "He deserves it and so do they."

Copyright © 2011 ABC News Internet Ventures

Gal-imony': Celeb Women Who Pay in the Divorce
Kate Walsh May Become Latest Female Celeb to Pay Alimony in Her Divorce

By LUCHINA FISHER
April 17, 2009—

Kate Walsh is hoping to avoid joining the ranks of other well-heeled celebrity women who've had to pay their ex-husbands after their divorces were final.

According to E! online, the star of the ABC show "Private Practice" has taken the pre-emptive measure of filing legal papers in an attempt to stop the court from awarding alimony to her estranged husband, film producer Alex Young, in their ongoing divorce battle.

Walsh and Young were married in September 2007. By last December, a short 15 months later, their marriage was over. Young filed for divorce citing irreconcilable differences. Walsh counter-sued two weeks later, claiming the relationship actually ended five days before Young said.

Perhaps Walsh has seen what's happened in recent years to other successful celebrity women, like Madonna, Britney Spears and Anne Heche, when they filed for divorce. In all three cases, the women not only earned more money than their former spouses but they ended up supporting their ex's after they split.

Kate Walsh and estranged husband Alex Young.
"Why should it be any different for women than it should be for men?" L.A.-based divorce attorney William Glucksman told ABCNews.com.

With women, in both the celebrity and business worlds, earning more and an evolution in matrimonial law to create more parity, Glucksman says women who pay spousal support are becoming more common.

Similarly, there's been an increase in women paying child support. More than half of divorce lawyers surveyed by the American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers last year cited an increase in the number of mothers assigned to make child support payments over the past five years.

"It's an outgrowth of many years of elimination of gender bias in matrimonial law," Glucksman said about the increased liability of women in divorces today. Slower to change has been the public's attitude about women paying in a divorce. "It's taken longer for people's philosophies and expectations to change," Glucksman said.

That includes men. "Many husbands whose philosophies or emotions are rooted in the more traditional or old world thinking don't want to ask for alimony," he said. "But I think it's incumbent upon attorneys or counsel to level the playing field. They have just as much right as a woman does. They shouldn't feel bad."

They are in good company. ABCNews.com takes a look at several high-profile divorces where the woman ended up paying alimony or "gal-imony."

Madonna

Madonna and ex-husband Guy Ritchie.
The Material Girl's reported $76-$96 million settlement with ex Guy Ritchie was considered a record payout, let alone one by a woman.

Even her publicist Liz Rosenberg acknowledged its significance. "I'd assume it's one of the largest payouts ever in a divorce settlement," Rosenberg told the AP. Not long after, Madonna and Ritchie issued their own statement refuting the settlement amount.

"We have tried to maintain a dignified silence regarding the details of our divorce for the last few months whilst accepting the obvious media interest. A misleading and inaccurate statement, specifically in relation to the sums of money involved, was wrongly issued , this week," their statement read. "The financial details of the settlement will remain private, save to say that both of us are happy with our agreement."

It's probably safe to add that Ritchie was likely happier with his end of the deal, since Madonna was the one paying.

Kirstie Alley

Kirstie Alley and ex-husband Parker Stevenson.
Alley's 1997 divorce from ex-husband Parker Stevenson became fodder for the tabloids when Stevenson sued for spousal support.

Alley was at the height of her career playing Ted Danson's love interest on "Cheers," when she split from her husband of 14 years, Stevenson of "Hardy Boys" and "Baywatch" fame.

In documents that leaked to the press, Stevenson detailed their lavish lifestyle, which included multiple residences with full-time staffs of housekeepers, chefs and nannies; exotic animals for pets, children's birthday parties with marching bands and lavish gifts of Ferraris and sailboats.

In one filing, Stevenson asked for "sufficient support" to "maintain a lifestyle commensurate to that which Kirstie and I had enjoyed during our marriage," including $18,000 a month to pay rent on a home in Bel Air.

Though Stevenson had once enjoyed the spotlight, he claimed that his earnings were only a fraction of what Alley earned and he did not expect to ever approach her income.

Ultimately, he settled for a one-time payout of $6 million, according to Forbes.com.

Anne Heche

Anne Heche and ex-husband Coley Laffoon.
Heche's divorce from Coley Laffoon was not pretty. In the press, she called him a deadbeat dad to their son Homer, now 6. In court papers, he called her crazy, referring to her 2001 autobiography titled "Call Me Crazy."

Heche, who had once been linked to Ellen DeGeneres, married Laffoon, a video photographer in 2002. Laffoon claimed in legal papers that he quit his job to stay home and take care of Homer while Heche was shooting the ABC series "Men in Trees" in Vancouver.

When the marriage broke up five years later, Laffoon sought at least $33,000 a month in spousal support and custody of Homer, claiming that Heche was a poor parent with "bizarre and delusional behavior," according to a court filing obtained by People magazine.

Heche shot back in a statement released to the press: "For the past several years, the child's father has refused to get a job in order to contribute financially to the child's care."

The case was finally settled earlier this year. In lieu of alimony, Heche was ordered to pay Laffoon a lump sum of $275,000 along with $3,700 a month in child support, according to The Associated Press.

Janet Jackson

Janet Jackson and her once secret ex-husband Rene Elizondo
Jackson was able to keep her 1991 marriage to longtime collaborator Rene Elizondo completely hush-hush until Elizondo filed for divorce in June 2000. "I hope my fans will understand that I tried to keep my marriage private in an effort to have a normal family life. I wish Rene only the best going forward," Jackson said in a statement to Jet magazine at the time.

Elizondo, who co-wrote 37 of Jackson's biggest hits, including "Rhythm Nation" and "That's the Way Love Goes," was obviously hoping for more than Jackson's best wishes. Challenging the validity of his prenuptial agreement, he sued Jackson for a reported $25 million in support.

After a two-year legal battle, the couple quietly settled. According to US Weekly, Elizondo received $15 million, the couple's Mercedes and their five-bedroom Malibu beachfront home.

Britney Spears

Britney Spears and her ex-husband Kevin Federline
When Spears ended her brief two-year marriage to rapper-dancer Kevin Federline in November 2006, she seemed to have the upper hand. There was a reported prenuptial agreement in place and she had custody of the couple's two boys Preston and Jayden.

Then Spears' world began to unravel, following a widely publicized hair-shaving incident and two stints in rehab. By March 2007, when a settlement was reached, it was reported that Federline had received anywhere from the $1 million stipulated in his prenup to $19 million.

By then, Federline was embroiled in a custody battle with Spears, who only had visitation rights to see their children. Last July she gave up her custody fight but has since gained more visiting time with the boys. At the same time, her child support payments to Federline increased by $5,000 to $20,000 a month.

Spears was also on the hook for Federline's legal fees at the tune of nearly half a million dollars.

Copyright © 2011 ABC News Internet Ventures

biolabee:

Still another celeb
Please this is getting boring
U all say that there shd be a settlement but there shd be a cap right?
ok y dont u prepare a pettion for a class action so as to cause a change in these law so as to protect your wealth fro mur would be wives

PHEW

I don't think that will be necessary.

You need to see the number of men that are doing Al Qaeda with their kids after divorce and unfair treatment in the UK courts. The government will soon see sense in changing the rules as more do it.

ThiefOfHearts:

That's what he gets for being a goat., Not a coincidence that most of the ones that go thru this arent married to black women. Since he wanted a fancy model so bad, good for him 

Stop hating!

Any reasonable, well brought up successful blackman needs to get a white or any non-black woman when he wants to marry. Why would they settle for less.  

ThiefOfHearts:

I have no pity for any rich celeb with no contract in place, not sure why you guys dey cry tears on their behalf.

harakiri:

@Sagamite. . . At this point, i think it's safe to say it's pointless bantering with these women. The system is aimed at benefiting them and even when they know the truth of this injustice, they will defend the anomaly by regurgitating all they've been brainwashed via the media and feminazi progandadists. A wise man once said "women and logic don't mix". The kind of comments on this thread says it all. The same women defending the system would feel different if their brother,son or close relative was affected. And there's a dumb hypocritical bimbo here talking about hypocrisy as if she knows the meaning of the word.

Women and logic definitely don't mix.

Only a foool will marry in the West and not have a pre-nup. Only a foool would think a woman will play fair when relationships collapse.

I have no pity for the mooronic stars that get married without prenup all in the name of luf.

na your mama be bimbo for not ingesting Plan B like she should have. Bloody gay-got like you.  

Logic and women dont mix. so what does that say about men that actually marry women? You twats really think you're being clever with your daft phrases/comebacks. "women are dumb teehee!!"  Ode.

They may be "dumb" but they are ones getting that money LOL.

You think Im joking when I say some of you have deep-rooted issues.

Can never be a discussion involving women without animals like you trying to belittle them and their worth.

Pathetic.

As I said earlier:

For me, if you ask a woman to sign prenup and she refuses, there is only 3 things possible.

She is one of the following:

1) Cunning - She is aware of the reasons why you ask for one, she is aware of the rationale of its necessity BUT she is refusing because she wants to have something to hold you by the balls with just in case she needs. This type is the type that is more likely to milk you to death in a divorce.

2) Selfish - She is aware of the reasons why you ask for one, she is aware of the rationale of its necessity BUT she is so self-centred, she is willing to put her idealism of trust before your peace of mind. This are the type of women that have some romantic notion but although marriages might be romantic, I don't think divorces have really ever romantic and the chances of her being romantic in divorce is like the chances of England winning the WC, so I will not risk joining in their idealism. Unfortunately, the consequence for me in divorce is worse than that for her failed idealism that will disappear once she realises what marriage really is.

3) Thick - She is NOT aware of the reasons why you ask for one and/or NOT aware of the rationale of its necessity. This is a dolt. She is dumb and does not keep abreast with important matters.

Whatever the section the woman falls in, none of the 3 traits is attractive as a life partner for me.

Cunning - This one fit even poison you or make you even father kids that are not yours.

Selfish - Thinks of only herself, sets the precedence for the marriage.

Thick - I would not do that to my kids, I will try and get them the best genes.

ThiefOfHearts:

na your mama be bimbo for not ingesting Plan B like she should have. Bloody gay-got like you.  

Logic and women dont mix. so what does that say about men that actually marry women? You twats really think you're being clever with your daft phrases/comebacks. "women are dumb teehee!!"  Ode.

They may be "dumb" but they are ones getting that money LOL.

You think Im joking when I say some of you have deep-rooted issues.

Can never be a discussion involving women without animals like you trying to belittle them and their worth.

Pathetic.

ROTFLMFAO!!!!

harakiri:

@Sagamite. . . At this point, i think it's safe to say it's pointless bantering with these women. The system is aimed at benefiting them and even when they know the truth of this injustice, they will defend the anomaly by regurgitating all they've been brainwashed via the media and feminazi progandadists. A wise man once said "women and logic don't mix". The kind of comments on this thread says it all. The same women defending the system would feel different if their brother,son or close relative was affected. And there's a dumb hypocritical bimbo here talking about hypocrisy as if she knows the meaning of the word.

Why this even a debate? Are any of these wealthy men complaining?

Since you don't believe in the institution of marriage at all and that men should just keep girlfriends, it's safe to say that you believe these women were wrong to get even one single penny in the case of divorce, no matter how many years of marriage and if there are children involved. You are alone in this view point. Maybe you want your sister, daughter, or other close relative to be girlfriends their whole lives. If my brother, son, or anyone else was affected I would say the same thing: get a prenup in place, and make sure you are marrying a woman who contributes to your life in a meaningful way.

@Sagamite- I'm not your sweetie. You must have me confused with a bimbo looking to trap you intro marriage and steal half your wealth. Your funds are safe for now.  

Serves them men right!!!

What is the point of marriage this days?

You can have everything outside marriage and Guys do you really have to own that chick?

Get yours and move on.

If you have to marry a chick, marry one with a job, her own money, career, house etc.

And please stop taking broke-ass females to the West.  You get swiped always.

ThiefOfHearts:

na your mama be bimbo for not ingesting Plan B like she should have. Bloody gay-got like you.  

Logic and women dont mix. so what does that say about men that actually marry women? You twats really think you're being clever with your daft phrases/comebacks. "women are silly teehee!!"  Ode.

They may be "silly" but they are ones getting that money LOL.

You think Im joking when I say some of you have deep-rooted issues.

Can never be an discussing involving women without animals like you trying to belittle them and their worth.

Pathetic.

And what has MAMA got to do with all this.Is his MAMA the one replying you.

Abegi leave parents out of this.

Why can't you state your own opinion without insulting the other party?

Question is how many men ask for pre-nups?

If anything a pre-nup is a contract both read and should agree on. same with divorce settlements, only reason why they courts are brought in is because if it were up to some men, they will never pay child support.

There lies the problem.

Nekai:

@Sagamite- I'm not your sweetie. You must have me confused with a bimbo looking to trap you intro marriage and steal half your wealth. Your funds are safe for now.  

There is no way you or any woman can get half of my wealth.

As your lawyers want to serve me, I will run to Western Union and transfer 90% of it to my cousin in Nigeria.

A 400 pound transfer can not cost me more than 7 quid with Western Union. Lets see how the courts will award you the remaining £100 when I need to eat.

emmatok, Why dont you come and make me?  

who are you sef? newbie coming from no where stalking me.

Either you give your own opinions on the issue/ignore my posts or stfu. Pick one.

@ Sagamite- I'm glad you realize these types do not make good partners. Some of these men made this mistake and ended up in trouble.
I actually agree with you on this, and I can honestly say that I understand the necessity of a prenup, where as before, I would have been opposed to the idea of a prenup on the grounds of being a 'Selfish' woman (as you described), and I woudn't have looked at it as giving a man peace of mind.

Sagamite:

There is no way you or any woman can get half of my wealth.

As your lawyers want to serve me, I will run to Western Union and transfer 90% of it to my cousin in Nigeria.

A 400 pound transfer can not cost me more than 7 quid with Western Union. Lets see how the courts will award you the remaining £100 when I need to eat.

I'm smarter than that. I would have already ran to Western Union and transferred 300 pounds to my cousin in the caribbean islands.

ThiefOfHearts:

emmatok, Why dont you come and make me?  

who are you sef? newbie coming from no where stalking me.

Either you give your own opinions on the issue/ignore my posts or stfu. Pick one.

Oh, who stalking you. See this JJC dey call me newbie.

I wonder why a grown up like you cannot take simple correction.

If you check this tread you will notice that the "views are more than replies" .

Which mean peeps are learning somethings from this tread. So keep your insults to your-self.

Stop hating!

Any reasonable, well brought up successful blackman needs to get a white or any non-black woman when he wants to marry. Why would they settle for less. Grin

I just saw this and my response to you is *waka*

emmatok, please go and sit down. No one cares.

Nekai, you gotta admit its funny that the ones who arte worth getting pre-nups dont get it yet the ones that dont have anything that warrants one are the ones screaming for it

ThiefOfHearts:

I just saw this and my response to you is *waka* 

[flash=400,350]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XJ7HZATMKBY[/flash]

since ive spabotted now

http://abcnews.go.com/print?id=8662940
http://abcnews.go.com/print?id=7356641


Women r now paying to men

Make una go marry paris hilton, ibb grabd pikin or u fit try madonna sef

biolabee:

since ive spabotted now

http://abcnews.go.com/print?id=8662940
http://abcnews.go.com/print?id=7356641


Women r now paying to men

Make una go marry paris hilton, ibb grabd pikin or u fit try madonna sef

What is your point?

That makes the laws make sense?

my point how
ive made my point since
u guys are going on and on and on about 100m dollars
seems nutin can get thru

So i put it to u can u propose a better model?

Women and logic don't mix

Unfortunately, this is true - 90% of the time. The few exceptions are truely gems to behold.

@ Topic

For those talking about a woman's "true worth" in a marriage, why is it so difficult to explain what this so-called true worth is? ? ? A woman is not worth her weight in gold simply because she's a woman. Her rare goodness (as determined and acknowledged by her husband) should serve as the basis for her "true worth" in the marriage. And we all know that finding a really good woman for a wife these days is a more herculean task than instilling cleanliness in a pig. That's why it is laughable to see these 'typical' girls here talking about a wife's "true worth" as if more than 5% of wives have any - other than rearing kids (whose paternities may even be doubtful). A genuinely good woman with "true worth" would not be interested in obtaining unearned/undeserved millions from her husband in the event of a divorce. Indeed a good wife would be very reluctant to seek divorce no matter what (e.g John Terry's wife). It's really unrealistic (and downright ridiculous) to expect your young, super-rich, handsome, ultra-successful (and perhaps famous) husband to be totally faithful to plain old you. The fact that he put you in his house as the official wifey (out of a thousand other eligible damsels) is a big enough privilege - why push your luck? Genuinely good wives with "true worth" understand that, and wouldn't use that as a 'flimsy' excuse to seek divorce in order to have a go at his fortune.

pro01:

Indeed a good wife would be very reluctant to seek divorce no matter what (e.g John Terry's wife).

Typical Nigerian. Same way the woman who was beaten to death by his husband in Atlanta last week was "reluctant" to divorce. Now she's dead. Bloody psychos that would rather their wives be dead/children end up motherless before letting her divorce them.

http://www.saharareporters.com/news-page/nigerian-man-shoots-wife-atlanta

http://nigeriavillagesquare.com/forum/main-square/56697-enraged-nigerian-professor-chukwudubem-okafor-kills-wife-self-u-s.html

Post #2 in the 2nd link is quite iinteresting

Divorce rate is the least of your problems

http://www.naijablog.co.uk/2008/08/500-nigerians-in-us-jails-charged-with.html

If you are getting married in the West make sure 70% of your asset are in Nigeria where no one can touch.

The house and any asset located in the West should be in your fathers name

Keep a low bank balance.

For the kids set up an account which would reimburse only expense made on the kids.

Knowing the number of men that have fallen victims in the West should make one wise

biolabee:

my point how
ive made my point since
u guys are going on and on and on about 100m dollars
seems nutin can get thru

So i put it to u can u propose a better model?

And you have not seen what I have been proposing since?

emmatok:

@ ThiefOfHeart

I am learning a lot from this tread .

So i will like you to stop throwing insults at everyone.

And this your [b]"NEGRO" yab [/b]is really bad. If you hate Blacks so much then why are you here?

No body is fighting we are just stating our different opinions.

OK.

You can imagine the nonsense of that little girl. She is as black as a coal stained pot and she's referring to guys as "Negroes"!. Look at a girl that looks as local as those girls who hawk ago-yin beans calling guys "Negroes"! !. A girl wearing cheap weave-on that has been on her head for months and stinks to high heavens calling guys "Negroes"! ! !.

I no blame am sha. Na open forum be this and omo-elewa is free to talk as she pleases.

Sagamite:

What is your point?

That makes the laws make sense?

just as u no c my point

biolabee:

just as u no c my point

Points that my points rubbished?

It is up to you to counter.

Sagamite:

Points that my points rubbished?

It is up to you to counter.

nope i dont have to
this page has gone 8 pages and u hv made no point so far

u say u blv in some form of settlement but still harp on 100m that tiger collected
ok then propose something u tell me squat there would be a movement to change all that

all u do is just moan moan abta problem but can not put up a framework whereby pple can start discussing abround then u say i am making rubbish points
reminds me of sepp blatter

i now see y duduspace did not bother going further with u, i think i will do same