Nwaelohim:


Your double standard stinks.
You were shouting BUHARI don't have certificate, so you know minimum requirements? Hmmm

He was actually making a joke out of the judgement that exonerated BUHARI.

I see sarcasm in what he wrote

Brendaniel:
APC has been rejected, what is the problem with these people

Don't APC ever get tired of supplying wickedness

He who come to equity must come with clean heart.

garfield1:
True.I agree.the main prayer remains over voting, other prayers are just bonus

Leave all this "The Nation" sensational reports.
The plank of APC's petition is on qualification status of Adeleke and over-voting.

Oyetola & APC claim.there was over-voting in 749 PUs.
Hear the expert witness of the Petitioner:

He told the tribunal that though he didn’t operate the BVAS machine on the election day on July 16, 2022, he received the Certified True Copy (CTC) of the BVAS report on July 27, 2022, after the election.

He testified that he is an expert, who had operated several electronic devices, including BVAS, before, and was aware that an electoral officer might fail to submit the data imputed into the machine or that if the network was bad, the data submitted would not be successful.

Nobody will leave BVAS machine evidence that was transmitted real-time and base his or her evidence on the report which is compiled by somebody and is prone to reasons the APC witness adduced there.

Leave this case abeg..... The certificate own is the one worrying the lawyers not this one.

fergie001:
Following affidavit evidence from the WAEC's Deputy Registrar, Examinations and the testimony of the Principal, the Appeal Court cleared both the Certificate & Testimonial in 2019.

Jauro and Agim (who took the lead judgement) were on that panel.

“Be that as it is, such errors are of no moment because Exhibit PL6 and the West African Examination Council (WAEC) confirming affidavit and Ledger show that he satisfied the requirements of Section 177(d) of the 1999 Constitution and is therefore qualified to contest the election of Governor of Osun State. As held by the Supreme Court in AGI v. PDP (2017) 17 NWLR (Pt. 1585) 386 at 454 – 455 “Even in situations where a Governorship candidate makes inconsistent statements in Form CF001 and such candidate is nonetheless qualified to contest the election under the provision of Section 177 of the 1999 Constitution, he would not be disqualified to contest the election.” The appellant gave the statement of result PL6 to the 4th respondent to show he sat for the West African School Certificate Examination (WASCE) in May/June, 1981 in Ede Muslim High School Ede. There was no need for the argument that he can only be issued certificate if he passed certain subjects. He submitted the statement of result to show that he attended secondary school and wrote the secondary school certificate examination.” (Agim JCA, as he then was)

Abeg lecture him well ooo, he’s still a clueless novice to know the truths about the matter.

Yo why they gon roll with my boi like that??That shyt tight, son Yo why they gon roll with my boi like that??That shyt tight, son ...

dalass:


I wonder how Adeleke's case follow reach the ladies on NL. Go and collect the phone you bought the underage girl to enter her vj and disturbing us with this rubbish.

Umph, i smelled zoomthing and not something.

Minjim:
Adeleke is a goner

Goner to where. APC is raising exactly the same issues they raised in 2018 election which the tribunal ruled in favour of Adeleke.

rolams:


Waec had already cleared him in the previous case.

, that he has the certificate? where did he want to get, something they didn't issue in his name from weac on separate sheet.

Alawode01:
, that he has the certificate? where did he want to get, something they didn't issue in his name from weac on separate sheet.

Read through the previous case.

He may get the statement of result.

garfield1:


Where is the complete one

INEC Already submitted it in their defence

etrouble:


Just like Emeka Ihediora is ruling nah

and obasaki of Edo state.

Tareq1105:


I want him to rule considering the love Osun people shown to him even though popularity is not the same thing with capacity and experience. He's the choice of the people and should therefore be allowed to rule even though I'm APC Tinubu. Anybody that win is the winner.

tinubu lost from his home state..
He will also lose in 2023...
They know it but just want to disgrace him and eat his money...

[quote author=rolams post=118839863]


Read through the previous case.

He may get the statement of result.statement of the result the he didn't pass,even weac want to issue result they wouldn't include where you got fail, and the his statement is failed not meet up with the requirements,he sat for it but he didn't have it with all subjects,so what is the equivalent here please?.

garfield1:
The sc ruling were based on manual accreditation not bvas.the 749 units or 10 lgas if expunged will give adeleke victoryll

garfield1:
Bvas reports are from bvas

BVAS report is a secondary evidence and subject to human and network challenges like the Card Reader reports. It is of no fruition when faced with the primary evidence. What is this Primary evidence? (Will be explained later)..

These reports are been inputted by humans and the Supreme Court analysed wrt Card Reader Reports in Shinkafi V Yari, Otti V Ikpeazu & Okereke V Umahi that it is the maker of that document that will give probative value to same otherwise it is .of no moment.

The SC insisted that Card Reader is expected to aid the Voter's Register (in accreditation) and not to supplant Register... Section 49(2) of the EA 2010.

Back to BVAS and Osun
Now, the expert witness for the Petitioner (Oyetola & APC), Isiaka Olanrewaju admitted he analysed the BVAS report of 749 PUs and allegedly found over-voting took place. He also told the tribunal that he is aware that the BVAS reports is subject to network and human challenges.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.thisdaylive.com/index.php/2022/11/22/election-results-bvas-report-established-over-voting-for-adeleke-witness-tells-tribunal/amp/

Like INEC argued, the Commission said it didn't finish updating when Oyetola requested for the CTC, a day after the election and it was handed over to him 2 weeks after the election. In 2015 in Akwa Ibom State, it took over 7 weeks for this to be updated. Now, INEC said it has fully updated and the BVAS machine will be tendered in evidence as well.

EA 2022. S62
(2)The Commission shall compile, maintain and update, on a continuous basis, a register of election results......

Don't also forget BVAS report is a post-election procedure. It is a process that takes place after elections has been completely concluded not during. (EA 2022. S62(1-3))

---

For Osun and 2023: The legal framework is based on three pillars: The Constitution, Electoral Act 2022 and INEC Regulations & Guidelines 2022.

1. You have a smart card reader or BVAS machine which authenticates your PVC. S47 EA 2022

2. After that your details must be checked, confirmed and ticked on the Voter's Register. (19e of INEC Regulations)

3. After the results are collated and announced at PU stage, results are entered into forms EC8A (signed, dated and stamped by PO).

4. No of persons accredited, failed ballots, results, etc are electronically transmitted to the collation centre and the IREV portal using the BVAS machine (they are stored therein as well

##. After which the BVAS machine and the original copy of Form EC8A are placed in tamperevident envelopes, and in company of the Security agents submitted to the RA and upwards it goes. (Section 38 of INEC Regulations).

1&2 happens during accreditation
3&4 happens during collation of results

To prove over-voting and/or accreditation issues, the BVAS reports will fail when faced with 1-4 above.

aiel123 engineerboat

[quote author=Alawode01 post=118841752][/quote]

The law did not mandate him to pass or fail.


That's how poor our constitution is.

fergie001:


BVAS report is a secondary evidence and subject to human and network challenges like the Card Reader reports. It is of no fruition when faced with the primary evidence. What is this Primary evidence? (Will be explained later)..

These reports are been inputted by humans and the Supreme Court analysed wrt Card Reader Reports in Shinkafi V Yari, Otti V Ikpeazu & Okereke V Umahi that it is the maker of that document that will give probative value to same otherwise it is .of no moment.

The SC insisted that Card Reader is expected to aid the Voter's Register (in accreditation) and not to supplant Register... Section 49(2) of the EA 2010.

Back to BVAS and Osun
Now, the expert witness for the Petitioner (Oyetola & APC), Isiaka Olanrewaju admitted he analysed the BVAS report of 749 PUs and allegedly found over-voting took place. He also told the tribunal that he is aware that the BVAS reports is subject to network and human challenges.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.thisdaylive.com/index.php/2022/11/22/election-results-bvas-report-established-over-voting-for-adeleke-witness-tells-tribunal/amp/

Like INEC argued, the Commission said it didn't finish updating when Oyetola requested for the CTC, a day after the election and it was handed over to him 2 weeks after the election. In 2015 in Akwa Ibom State, it took over 7 weeks for this to be updated. Now, INEC said it has fully updated and the BVAS machine will be tendered in evidence as well.

EA 2022. S62
(2)The Commission shall compile, maintain and update, on a continuous basis, a register of election results......

Don't also forget BVAS report is a post-election procedure. It is a process that takes place after elections has been completely concluded not during. (EA 2022. S62(1-3))

---

For Osun and 2023: The legal framework is based on three pillars: The Constitution, Electoral Act 2022 and INEC Regulations & Guidelines 2022.

1. You have a smart card reader or BVAS machine which authenticates your PVC. S47 EA 2022

2. After that your details must be checked, confirmed and ticked on the Voter's Register. (19e of INEC Regulations)

3. After the results are collated and announced at PU stage, results are entered into forms EC8A (signed, dated and stamped by PO).

4. No of persons accredited, failed ballots, results, etc are electronically transmitted to the collation centre and the IREV portal using the BVAS machine (they are stored therein as well

##. After which the BVAS machine and the original copy of Form EC8A are placed in tamperevident envelopes, and in company of the Security agents submitted to the RA and upwards it goes. (Section 38 of INEC Regulations).

1&2 happens during accreditation
3&4 happens during collation of results

To prove over-voting and/or accreditation issues, the BVAS reports will fail when faced with 1-4 above.

aiel123 engineerboat

Theres no need for any report.all the 749 bvas machines in issue will be analysed

garfield1:


Theres no need for any report.all the 749 bvas machines in issue will be analysed

Exactly.....

fergie001:
Exactly.....

Which APC must have done to arrive at that over voting...

On another note,accredited votes are disseminated quicker than result uploads.to accredit,you dont need network and it uploads or send data to inec long before results are uploaded.before election results are announced fully,accreditation figures are ready.this jargon of synchronization or completing upload after 7 weeks is a lie except inec are colluding to falsify or match results.

garfield1:


Which APC must have done to arrive at that over voting...

On another note,accredited votes are disseminated quicker than result uploads.to accredit,you dont need network and it uploads or send data to inec long before results are uploaded.before election results are announced fully,accreditation figures are ready.this jargon of synchronization or completing upload after 7 weeks is a lie except inec are colluding to falsify or match results.

No, APC has been calling witnesses and have based on the CTC of the BVAS reports.

After inspection of the BVAS itself, Adeleke's lawyers said there was over-voting but it was non-substantial in that when the votes are removed, Adeleke will still win.

APC don't want the machine itself.... The machine is the 'koko.'

fergie001:

No, APC has been calling witnesses and have based on the CTC of the BVAS reports.

After inspection of the BVAS itself, Adeleke's lawyers said there was over-voting but it was non-substantial in that when the votes are removed, Adeleke will still win.

APC don't want the machine itself.... The machine is the 'koko.'

Even if there's massive over voting, will adeleke lawyers accept? Those witnesses are not important,the bvas speaks for itself.at least,there is over voting.we need to establish how substantial it is

garfield1:


Even if there's massive over voting, will adeleke lawyers accept? Those witnesses are not important,the bvas speaks for itself.at least,there is over voting.we need to establish how substantial it is

We will wait for the BVAS when Adeleke opens.his defence.

Minjim:


https://punchng.com/tribunal-inec-presents-blurry-adelekes-testimonial-oyetola-kicks/?utm_source=telegram&utm_medium=social

Why are u ppl ranting over irrelevant things, Adeleke was accused of forging his certificate not because it is blurry, what Apc should do is to prove that the certificate his fake by asking Waec to confirm the if it's original

Remember Obaseki certificate was said not to be fake but its not in good shape because of the printer
Let's be guided

This is a photocopy of the stamped one inec has. The stamp on this is not ink. It's photocopy. Inec should produce the copy they have with ink stamp. Then they compare with this blurry nonsense. Cos how do you explain inec accepting a photocopy that barely shows a candidates name or even the subjects offered? Whoever accepted those and stamped should be sacked.

The only thing you need is a result. If its blurred, then question is what do you wanna see. if its the subject , then the ID numbers can be sent to waec and they will send it

Minjim:
Adeleke is a goner

His Co-travellers won’t believe you. Executive Orders will save him though!

We are watching

fergie001:


BVAS report is a secondary evidence and subject to human and network challenges like the Card Reader reports. It is of no fruition when faced with the primary evidence. What is this Primary evidence? (Will be explained later)..

These reports are been inputted by humans and the Supreme Court analysed wrt Card Reader Reports in Shinkafi V Yari, Otti V Ikpeazu & Okereke V Umahi that it is the maker of that document that will give probative value to same otherwise it is .of no moment.

The SC insisted that Card Reader is expected to aid the Voter's Register (in accreditation) and not to supplant Register... Section 49(2) of the EA 2010.

Back to BVAS and Osun
Now, the expert witness for the Petitioner (Oyetola & APC), Isiaka Olanrewaju admitted he analysed the BVAS report of 749 PUs and allegedly found over-voting took place. He also told the tribunal that he is aware that the BVAS reports is subject to network and human challenges.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.thisdaylive.com/index.php/2022/11/22/election-results-bvas-report-established-over-voting-for-adeleke-witness-tells-tribunal/amp/

Like INEC argued, the Commission said it didn't finish updating when Oyetola requested for the CTC, a day after the election and it was handed over to him 2 weeks after the election. In 2015 in Akwa Ibom State, it took over 7 weeks for this to be updated. Now, INEC said it has fully updated and the BVAS machine will be tendered in evidence as well.

EA 2022. S62
(2)The Commission shall compile, maintain and update, on a continuous basis, a register of election results......

Don't also forget BVAS report is a post-election procedure. It is a process that takes place after elections has been completely concluded not during. (EA 2022. S62(1-3))

---

For Osun and 2023: The legal framework is based on three pillars: The Constitution, Electoral Act 2022 and INEC Regulations & Guidelines 2022.

1. You have a smart card reader or BVAS machine which authenticates your PVC. S47 EA 2022

2. After that your details must be checked, confirmed and ticked on the Voter's Register. (19e of INEC Regulations)

3. After the results are collated and announced at PU stage, results are entered into forms EC8A (signed, dated and stamped by PO).

4. No of persons accredited, failed ballots, results, etc are electronically transmitted to the collation centre and the IREV portal using the BVAS machine (they are stored therein as well

##. After which the BVAS machine and the original copy of Form EC8A are placed in tamperevident envelopes, and in company of the Security agents submitted to the RA and upwards it goes. (Section 38 of INEC Regulations).

1&2 happens during accreditation
3&4 happens during collation of results

To prove over-voting and/or accreditation issues, the BVAS reports will fail when faced with 1-4 above.

aiel123 engineerboat

Oyetola Expert bungle that case right from the word go.

They were not patient enough honestly

garfield1:


Theres no need for any report.all the 749 bvas machines in issue will be analysed

The question is Does Oyetola Star analysist did, the answer is beholding us in the face, all what they depend on is that incomplete synchronized server report,

He has not analyzed the BVAS report.

So there Tribunal case is based on an incomplete Secondary evidence

garfield1:


Which APC must have done to arrive at that over voting...

On another note,accredited votes are disseminated quicker than result uploads.to accredit,you dont need network and it uploads or send data to inec long before results are uploaded.before election results are announced fully,accreditation figures are ready.this jargon of synchronization or completing upload after 7 weeks is a lie except inec are colluding to falsify or match results.

Oyetola counsel are not ready for the BVAS analyses with the believe that something might have happened.

Again the ball is on them to prove that anything happened.

So Oyetola Star expert have more work to do

socialmediaman:
Since there's a number on the certificate, they can adjourn the case and write to WAEC for verification.

Some people whose education and life history started from when they appeared in Chicago (and started trafficking heroin) don't even have that one

lol

I thought the tribunal case is between pdp and oyetola. You and those giving you like are batstard brain dead idiots.


authorpost=118829596]Obi-diots will avoid this thread. This is not what they want to see.[/quote]

Enemyofpeace:
ok I've reduced it to 70

Hahahah. . . you're wicked!!!!