0ubenji's Posts
Nairaland Forum › 0ubenji's Profile › 0ubenji's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 (of 72 pages)
Joysmith2:ok...one of the she-goats members spotted... |
olihilistic:well...am part of dat 1% u refused to acknowledge |
sod09:yea.. Christ embassy |
PapiNick:what u av, young man, is not an opinion.. But absence of conscience |
![]() SlimmB: U dey mind the mumu...Forming cassanova..calling it virtue |
joyContraMundum:I av nothing against that man or whatever he says..it's always his opinion which he's definitely entitled to. My problem is with d goats in his church dat call demsefs members, who know nothing or won't do nothing about their lives until he speaks.. If he wakes up tomorrow again and say it's not good..they'll still say yes, he's right.. Religion has really done more harm to education than illiteracy in dis country. Naija Christianity has made men rever men of God Dan God himself. |
PapiNick:U too dey vex sef.. I dint posit that scenario to u in a marriage situation too. I'm saying nothing bad if she sleeps around too when u guys are not married mehn.. As long as she loves and respects u She sleeping around when u guys are married and when not married are two different tinz mehn. As long as she loves and respects u..it doesn't matter So nothing bad she does same Cox u both ain't married as u did too Abi no be so? |
PapiNick:bro..u're right jaree..ur babe can cheat on u with anyone.. Even ur brother sef.. As long as she respects and loves u.. That doesn't mean she's a slut.. Abi no be so? |
blueAgent:I said this, which u quoted too: Freewill definitely has consequences but these consequences must be independent of the influence of the person givin it, if dat will is indeed free ____________ Yet u ask me dis strange question? U're jux talking but not listening.. More like u confused already. Ur Comprehension skills is somewhat questionable |
blueAgent:relax, u need to stop being pensive and read well to comprehension. I stated and will stil emphasise. Freewill definitely has consequences but these consequences must be independent of the influence of the person givin it, if dat will is indeed free Or manipulation is the case.. |
blueAgent:haha..now I'm a fool..lolz The holy spirit is obviously at work in u.. |
blueAgent:even the grief that the bible says he may cause us is for his pleasure? ![]() This is enuf to derail weak converts, you're not always conscious of what u say at all mahn.. Now, u r saying something new again.. Evry negative thing God allows is no longer out of love, but to show forth glory. What an emulative way to show glory, this is, according to you.. |
blueAgent:there you go again..u're accusing me of ur sin.. U started dis thread with ignorant assertions u claim to knw bou God..dis was wat started d debate. Shamefully, u started dribbling ur way out of ur own assertions on what u claimed to knw bou God or his intent for whatever he does., only for u to claim I'm playing on words... Ur next defense is to play d victim card.. Lolz |
blueAgent:good, so u're the one who knows d right way..nd on itz me on d wrong one chey.. Spiritual over confidence dey wori u.. I bliv u must av come across 1cor 10:12 |
blueAgent:If the consequences of a choice is not independent of the powers of the one giving it.. It's not..freewill DAts pure marketing strategy. I tell u dat u're free to enter one of two rooms to do what u like, meanwhile I've specifically prepared a fire to burn u to Ashes if u go into one .. Nd you'll tel me I av given u free will? ...when I'm well aware that ur knowledge of a fire being there will definitely control ur ability to choose which room to go? Definitely ur ability to choose has been controlled by the virtue of the consequences I invented for u.. The independence of choice is already invalid. U chose to do Good coz u wanna avoid hell(prepped by God) blueAgent, is ur choice not controlled by God already? Ur choice is no longer voluntary coz u r playing by some rules and pretend it to be ur actual choice when u know deep down its not what u had in mind. You're missing d point, the problem is not d consequence, there z a law of cause and effect in place already dat acts independently. U cant invent a consequence for my choice and say u av given me freewill. Lamentations 3:32 acknowledges dat God may cause us grief, why dint God choose to allow us decide if we want d grief or not before afflictin us without our consent? Freewill is also meant to be able to decide ur fate again by d liberty of ur choices..lolz..but job dint choose to be afflicted by diseases u knw..his freewill was abused don't u fink? Mehn..semantics, it's not something u play with in a debate, u must understand the logics of composition or you'll never win, even if ur opponent is dull. U had berra stick to ur quotation of irreconcilable bible verses nd avoid a philosophical debate, lolz..it's not ur calling.. I'll rather spare u in dis regard nd go back to d status quo of our debate. |
blueAgent:where did i write that all sufferings are becos of God's love or tria U asked for this, in an attempt to deny ur prior perspective, and I answered u with.. In Conclusion God has allowed all this to happen out of his loving and just nature,so that all his creations can appreciate his gift of freewill. Yet u stil asked for a contradiction in ur assertions, a second time? We're both typing in our lingua Franca bro, not Swahili. Funny enuf u claim I craftedly refused to answer a question I explicitly put to u in emboldened quotations of urs. I'm beginning to fink I'm in a debate wit more than just U. |
blueAgent:why do God feel he had something to prove to Satan in Job, if there was no intention to impress...? Yet u say, God doesn't or wasn't seeking to impress Satan or anything. I told u, the picture u painted of that narrative shows Satan whined God and succumbed, hence he afflicted job. You disagreed, saying God wasn't whined. You, stil, later reiterated that it was a contest Btw them.. Which must av erupted coz Satan did d whining.. Remember, u said God initiated the conversation, nd you stil claim he dint av a motive to impress. Speaking from both sides of ur mouth ![]() |
blueAgent:I want to kill, I chose not to, for the fear of hell. Nd u call dat freewill... lolz. Young man...u av no idea what freewill is... I refuse to educate u on dat...goto to dat thread I recommended for u or forget issues..case closed |
blueAgent:I don't need to flood u with examples. You'll get ur answer from The following question. Is evry grief experienced by an individual always deserved? If ur answer is NO as shud be .. Whatever examples u ignorantly and naively asked me for earlier lies in ur reasons for that NO. |
blueAgent:God allowed the evil that befell Adam take place coz of Love, even tho he saw it from the start ..no be so? Search nairaland for a thread on freewill..I contributed actively in dat thread alongside others.. You'll learn something new.. DAts if u're ready to do away with bigotry |
blueAgent:[b]Satan rulership of this world is what we see today in form of wars,Chaos,famine,corruption,genocide,earthquakes,injustice,poverty,drought,disasters,racism,tribalism,rape,incest,hurricanes,e.t.c It was imperative for God to allow all this to happen inorder to unreval the true nature of Satan and to show the entire Universe what the Universe will be like,when things are done outside his divinelaws, ------------------ In Conclusion God has allowed all this to happen out of his loving and just nature,so that all his creations can appreciate his gift of freewill. -------------- All above are in ur very own words. Culled from ur oxymoronic epistle.. You're one easy man to debate with I must confess.. |
blueAgent:berra don't fight ur sweet friend out of dis frustration..she's on ur side oo ![]() Juz calm Dan nd let's keep enjoying our debate |
blueAgent:another suicidal expression yet again..u really need to sharpen ur debating skills.. An individual gets into a contest with a motive to impress either the spectators or the opponent. But, u said God was not trying to impress anyone in job's case, that God doesn't impress or had in mind to do dat. Nau, u acknowledge it was a contest? So why do u think God got into a contest with an idiot like Satan, if not to impress? Someone he created himself. U cnt even define ur position bro..lolz I keep swaying u back and forth |
blueAgent:but in a case where it is not? Out of love baa? |
kullozone:same thing a christian brother told him but won't listen. The type that brings ignominy to the name of God nd Christian-fold. |
blueAgent:good..now I'm bringing out the real man behind the ignorant sermon ![]() |
blueAgent:proclaiming the word of God erroneously with irreconcilable and contradictory expressions in your statements can never be what God sent u. Juz coz u keep rendering a barrage of bible verses with ur proclamations doesn't make u Godsent or spirit filled. blueAgent:always try to quote appropriate bible verses strictly or atleast loosely in the context of what u assert. How does this apply to ur debate of your allusion of God's permission of evil upon us to Love? This verse u quoted is meant to defend urself against adversaries who know not Christ in u. Seein you undergo difficult situations, yet with hope. Peter instructs us to be ready to answer the question our life should inspire: "How can you be so hopeful in such difficult circumstances?" Peter anticipates people will become curious. Hopefulness and joy are starkly different from the normal human response to suffering. So much so that people will be eager to understand it. What will we say when they ask? We must be prepared to give our defense, to make the case for faith in Christ. We need to reject the cultural pressure to keep our beliefs to ourselves. Instead, believers should openly share the good news of redemption through faith in Christ. This verse u rendered was grossly misapplied blueAgent:good, this applies to the Case of Job suffering for well doing as recorded in the bible. This means u've explicitly acknowledged suffering in christendom. Now, you shifted to the will of God being so, no longer, God allowing it out of love and just nature as u put earlier. I bet You'll attempt to entwine both, saying God's will is love always. Yea, u right, this means it's his wish to do so if countless number of children and mothers suffer for nothing, worldwide. No food to eat or places to live. Some even die In their situation. Humanity(irrespective of their religion factions or belief system) do d best they can to help this ppl suffering for either well-doing or evil-doing which nobody but God knws, as far as we'd like to bliv it's his will. But why da heck will u allude this totally to God's love and Just nature? This is pure fanatic Christianity. U find it easy to spill these Ignorant phrases probably coz u find urself In a better standard of life compared to those undergoing the real hellish circumstances of life that u use as basis for ur faith. blueAgent:enhancement can only apply to a preexisting entity. How bou someone who doesn't even knw the Christian faith, struggling to survive, children that have known suffering all their lives, ppl who wake up not knowing if they'll live thru dat day. I guess their inexplicable suffering is to enhance a faith that wasn't there in d first place? I guess u've lived all ur life in d corners of a church. You don't read news, goto UNICEF, WHO, USAID websites and see suffering, then you'll fink well before u brag in ur thankful circumstances. There's nothing as honorable as when a christian learns to bridle their tongue whenever necessary. You must fink u're now a bible scholar to try to attempt answers to questions humanity have been waiting on God to answer Convincingly for countless centuries. Let God be God, and do ur job of serving him in purity and truth, dont attempt to bring taint to his name with ur fanatism Even d best of preachers do their possible best to steer off of the most controversial debate ever in christendom The concept of Good and Evil with respect to God's will. It'll forever be an unfinished business. blueAgent:you agree once again that God will cause grief and later av compassion due to love? If love is what God uses to end the grief he may afflict us with out of his will. What then prompts God to cause the grief in the first place. Love too I presume as u've said in all ur opening article uh? |
chyzoo4u:sexxkillz...how body.... I hear say Mmm is back Have u gone for ur own overdue brainwash and treatment for mouth diarrhoea? The next comment I see u drop now is likely involve the word peppersoup as always. |
Bobo121:If he's not popular at d moment..wud u av heard of him at all? |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 (of 72 pages)



