Tpfkakambo:

the parables in d bible never strted with "there was a certain man except for the parable of d prodgl son and d shrewd manager,the good samaritan, and d great banquet". This is not suffcient justication for a parable.

alexleo:

Get thee behind me satan.

frosbel: ^^^^

Funny enough , the JW you keep tagging in your comments , are more on point with some of the key bible doctrines.

obadiah777: I SEE YOU ARE HERE BEING A REPROBATE AGAIN ? OF COURSE JESUS IS ARCH-ANGEL MICHEAL

obadiah777: LMAO. NOW I KNOW YOU ARE DRUNK ON SHEKPE. NOW LET ME PROVE ONCE AND FOR ALL TO EVERYONE OUT THERE THAT JESUS IS MICHEAL. IF YOU SUPPORT THIS POST AND HAVE BEEN EDIFIED BY THIS POST, PLEASE ACKNOWLEDGE. IF YOU THINK I AM FULL OF CRAP ALSO, PLEASE ACKNOWLEDGE. OK NOW LETS FINALLY PROVE THAT JESUS IS MICHEAL

JUDE VS 9 Yet Michael the archangel, when contending with the devil he disputed about the body of Moses, durst not bring against him a railing accusation, but said, The Lord rebuke thee. <<<<< MICHEAL CALLING HIMSELF THE LORD ? AND MAKING REFERENCE TO WHEN HE TOLD SATAN DURING THE TEMPTATION AFTER 40 DAYS FAST THAT THE LORD REBUKE THEE

NOW LADIES AND GENTLEMEN I THINK THIS MATTER AND ISSUE HAS BEEN RESOLVED FOREVER

alexleo:

Your points are useless, baseless and empty so there is nothing to think about in it. You people are just deceiving yourselves with this satanic teachings.

obadiah777:
obadiah777: LMAO. NOW I
KNOW YOU ARE DRUNK ON
SHEKPE. NOW LET ME PROVE
ONCE AND FOR ALL TO
EVERYONE OUT THERE THAT
JESUS IS MICHEAL. IF YOU
SUPPORT THIS POST AND HAVE
BEEN EDIFIED BY THIS POST,
PLEASE ACKNOWLEDGE. IF YOU
THINK I AM FULL OF CRAP ALSO,
PLEASE ACKNOWLEDGE. OK
NOW LETS FINALLY PROVE THAT
JESUS IS MICHEAL
JUDE VS 9 Yet Michael the
archangel, when contending
with the devil he disputed
about the body of Moses, durst
not bring against him a railing
accusation, but said, The Lord
rebuke thee. <<<<< MICHEAL
CALLING HIMSELF THE LORD ?
AND MAKING REFERENCE TO
WHEN HE TOLD SATAN DURING
THE TEMPTATION AFTER 40
DAYS FAST THAT THE LORD
REBUKE THEE
NOW LADIES AND GENTLEMEN I
THINK THIS MATTER AND ISSUE
HAS BEEN RESOLVED FOREVER


<<< DO YOU AGREE WITH THAT BOOKMARK

Tpfkakambo:

the parables in d bible never strted with "there was a certain man except for the parable of d prodgl son and d shrewd manager,the good samaritan, and d great banquet". This is not suffcient justication for a parable.
All others began wth: he told thm a parable, the kingdom of God is like,etc.
Parables are wrd pictures Jesus used to teach a spiritual fact.
The parable of d banquet illustrated d kingdom of God.
The prodgl son illustrates wat Jesus said in the parable of d lost coin, there is joy wen a lost sinner returns,
the gud samaritan was used to demonstrate wat lov is.and to correct a bigoted lawyer wu wanted to justify himself.
Luke10V29.
V30. "in replyg jesus said:.."
Jesus' parable were 99 percnt about wat the kingdom of God /heaven is like.
He never used actual names..
There was a moral to it.

On d other hand, the rch man and lazarus gave wasnt a moral story
or about d kingdom of heaven,
and cited ACTUAL PEOPLE , abraham, so if it was a parable Jesus was lyng!
Jesus never used death , hell to teach a parable.
Jesus used illustrations the ppl were already familiar with to teach illustrate spiritual thngs.
Like . The sower,isreal was agrarian.
The lost sheep, the weeds,
the banquet,
the lost son,
the wheat nd tares,
the mustard seed,
the talents
the sheep and goat
the ten virgins
the vineyard
etc
because d ppl cud realte with these. He kept it simple. Y wud he break his princple of keepng it simple and relatve to concoct sth like the rchman and lazarus?
because tht wasnt a parable!

frosbel: ^^

You are a very good example of the immense damage cults are doing to our youth , when we suspend our ability to reason out the scriptures, we end up as easy prey for the deception of MEN. I hope one day , your eyes will be open.

alexleo:

Of course I can't follow your idiotic teachings of no hell bla bla bla. No doubt, satan has blindfolded and caged you with this evil doctrine, using you to deceive the weak minded that's why its hard for you to break away. I hope your eyes will open one day. Quite a pity what pride can do to a person.

alexleo:

Of course I can't follow your idiotic teachings of no hell bla bla bla. No doubt, satan has blindfolded and caged you with this evil doctrine, using you to deceive the weak minded that's why its hard for you to break away. I hope your eyes will open one day. Quite a pity what pride can do to a person.

Bidam: someone that says man is not made of spirit, soul and body. how can he understand simple biblical explanation about hell? SMH!

frosbel:

My eyes opened when I left your cult and the likes .

Bidam: someone that says man is not made of spirit, soul and body. how can he understand simple biblical explanation about hell? SMH!

alexleo:

My dear this agents of satan are twisting the bible. They stu.pidly quote the scriptures and give it satanic interpretation. See how one of their agents said that Elijah didn't actually ascend into heaven just because the place I quoted destroyed his evil plan of trying to manipulate the scripture he quoted to drive his devilish teaching. He explained the heaven Elijah was taken to as just the sky where plane and birds fly. Very deperate and shameless people. Heaven has suddenly had several interpretations same way they interpreted hell because their idiotic teaching must be propagated. Hopeless beings.

frosbel: ^^^^

Funny enough , the JW you keep tagging in your comments , are more on point with some of the key bible doctrines.

frosbel: If you are a Jehovah's Witness please understand that I am not against you as an individual. I am not an apostate from the Watchtower organization and, of course, I was never baptized as a Jehovah's Witness. However, when I was 17, I studied with the Jehovah's Witnesses for a couple of months, but quit. Unfortunately, they used the Watchtower Magazine equally, and sometime more than the Bible and they couldn't answer all my questions. All I wanted to study was the Bible since that is God's word.
As a Jehovah's Witness you have been taught from the Bible and the Watchtower organization. You’ve attended numerous meetings, and are convinced that what you believe is the truth. You also believe the Trinity is a demonic doctrine and that Christendom isan apostate group preaching a false gospel. Additionally, you are taught the Watchtower organization is the true channel of God’s revelation to His church on earth. You are taught that you are in"The Truth."
But believing it does not make it so. I am sure you agree with this and respond by saying that your beliefs are in agreement with the Bible. After all, you study it deeplyand often and have validated your beliefs with the word of God. I don’t deny that you study. But when you study, you study under the Watchtower's guidance and allow it to shape your understanding and thinking of the Bible and its doctrines.
Please consider these quotes from the Watchtower Magazine that verify what I am saying:
"All who want to understand the Bible should appreciate that the "greatly diversified wisdom of God" can become known only through Jehovah's channel ofcommunication, the faithful and discreet slave."1
"Thus the Bible is an organizational book and belongs to the Christian congregation as an organization, not to individuals, regardless of how sincerely they may believe that they can interpret the Bible."2
In short, you are led by what the Watchtower says the Bible says. But if the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society is from God, then,
Why has it made false prophecies?
Why has it altered the translation of the Bible?
Why does the Watchtower say you will fallinto apostasy if you read the Bible without the Watchtower? See their quotes
Why are you not allowed to examine yourown organization and its problems?
Why does it tell you what to think and do?
Have you checked the documentation from the Watchtower Magazine? How do you know that the Watchtower is correct?Because it says it is?
Please don’t be offended by this. But when a group claims to be the prophet ofGod, yet mistranslates the Bible, takes verses out of context, makes false prophecies, and misquotes authorities all to make its position valid, its credibility is lost. It cannot be from God.
But you will never know that unless you"examine ALL things." Unfortunately, as a Jehovah's Witness, you are only encouraged to study what the Watchtower and Awake magazines tell you to study. That means you can't really check up on its false prophecies on your own. Instead, you must trust what it tells you about its own false prophecies. In addition, you are instructed to not take any literature from "apostate Christendom." This way, you will have far less opportunity to be challenged, something the Watchtower organization doesn't want to happen.
The Watchtower Magazine teaches by asking the questions and giving the answers. Sometimes it even uses a Bible reference (often out of context) to back up what it says. It all looks good and sounds good from your perspective. But it is a false method of study. The Watchtower organization tells you what to think and what to do; if you say that isn't true and that the Watchtower Organization is God's organization on earth, then you are simply repeating whatthe Watchtower tells you.

alexleo:

My dear this agents of satan are twisting the bible. They stu.pidly quote the scriptures and give it satanic interpretation. See how one of their agents said that Elijah didn't actually ascend into heaven just because the place I quoted destroyed his evil plan of trying to manipulate the scripture he quoted to drive his devilish teaching. He explained the heaven Elijah was taken to as just the sky where plane and birds fly. Very deperate and shameless people. Heaven has suddenly had several interpretations same way they interpreted hell because their idiotic teaching must be propagated. Hopeless beings.

Bidam: Don't mind them my brother.Jesus came from the Father because He was with the Father from the very beginning John 1:1..If Not so how did David knew to call Him Lord? How did Paul also knew to call Him Lord when he encountered Him on the road to Damascus? They are yet to tell us why Paul paid a visit to the third heavens.

ijawkid:

Please alex....when Jesus said no " NO man has ascended into heaven" was he on shekpe??....

Was Jesus smoking marijuana when he made that confirmatory statement about who was in heaven and who wasn't ??.......or is it that when Jesus was descending or was in heaven elijah sneaked in without his notice??.....

Please don't quickly term the comments of people as rubbish when you have not considered all the facts.......

frosbel:

They guy has stopped thinking.

alexleo:

If thinking means accepting your idiotic and satanic message then so be it. What a shameless satanic desperado. I ll vehemently oppose any satan inspired teaching you bring here. You want to lure people into eternal damnation. You ll fail serially.

frosbel:

For a so called Christian you are rude , abusive and always angry, check yourself brother.

alexleo:

My dear this agents of satan are twisting the bible. They stu.pidly quote the scriptures and give it satanic interpretation. See how one of their agents said that Elijah didn't actually ascend into heaven just because the place I quoted destroyed his evil plan of trying to manipulate the scripture he quoted to drive his devilish teaching. He explained the heaven Elijah was taken to as just the sky where plane and birds fly. Very deperate and shameless people. Heaven has suddenly had several interpretations same way they interpreted hell because their idiotic teaching must be propagated. Hopeless beings.

truthislight:

What has become of you? easy men.

when the bible says "birds of heaven", does it refer to the birds in the throne of God? No.

But the birds simply fly in the skies, that is the sense of it.

And, Jesus said this below, who should i belief, between u and Jesus?:

"And no man hath ascended up to heaven, but he that came down from heaven, even the Son of man which is in heaven." (John 3:13).
..............................................

Elijah did not go to heaven, the throne of God.


the bible does not contradict itself. .

alexleo:

And nay be Elijah suddenly became a human bird of the heaven by that action. Enoch probably is now in your village since the bible said he did not taste death. Paul must have also lied that he was taken to the third heaven going by your submission. The several places that Jesus talked about hell and its torments haven't you twisted it in you usual satanic manner? You are a merchant of lies. You can't deceive me. Elijah's ministry ended when he ascended to heaven and Elisha took over his mantle. stop your stu.pid and senseless twisting of the scripture. Tell your master satan that you can't continue to run his trade of falsehood for him because its detrimental to the eternal destiny of your soul.

frosbel:


Did your 'perfect' apostle faith church teach you this :

2 Timothy 2:24-25
King James Version (KJV)
24 And the servant of the Lord must not strive; but be gentle unto all men, apt to teach, patient,

25 In meekness instructing those that oppose themselves; if God peradventure will give them repentance to the acknowledging of the truth;

ijawkid:

How can the boldeÐ not be enough Évidence to show that the introductory part of the story of the rich man and lazarus is a parable??........it is obvious that it is......how can the parable of the shrewd manager which started luke chapter 16 and with the same ""there was a certain rich man"" be a parable and the succeeding story of the rich man and lazarus that started the same way not be a parable??........please how??............

Can we also agree that the parable of the shrewd manager and the prodigal son aren't parables too??.....

Please take a look at how Jesus started this parable too.......

Luke 13:6

6 Then he told this parable: “A man had a fig
tree growing in his vineyard, and he went to
look for fruit on it but did not find any. ....


If you still insist that the story of the rich man and lazarus isn't a parable then I have questions for you which in your wildest dreams you might not be able to answer...........

Are you ready??

ijawkid:

How can the boldeÐ not be enough Évidence to show that the introductory part of the story of the rich man and lazarus is a parable??........it is obvious that it is......how can the parable of the shrewd manager which started luke chapter 16 and with the same ""there was a certain rich man"" be a parable and the succeeding story of the rich man and lazarus that started the same way not be a parable??........please how??............

Can we also agree that the parable of the shrewd manager and the prodigal son aren't parables too??.....

Please take a look at how Jesus started this parable too.......

Luke 13:6

6 Then he told this parable: “A man had a fig
tree growing in his vineyard, and he went to
look for fruit on it but did not find any. ....


If you still insist that the story of the rich man and lazarus isn't a parable then I have questions for you which in your wildest dreams you might not be able to answer...........

Are you ready??