₦airaland Forum

Oma307:
is season 2 out

Nope.

Shanara Chronicles

OP, hw far no.13

KingEbukasBlog:
Why do you deny the possibility of miracles ?

I don't deny the possibility of miracles, but the reason behind them.

KingEbukasBlog:
7 months = 31 days

The same 7 months still have 28 days

Bravo!!

KingEbukasBlog:
The first one is 8 cos it is made of two zeros . All these riddles are old

Are u serious, now i'm just angry

KingEbukasBlog:
2,4, 8 , 16 , 32 ... 2n can be halved continuously

Lol, you really are annoying.

Fine, then we are all correct.

KingEbukasBlog:
Ok then let's continue .

Do you believe that your god could be intervening but you have now found out how ?

Nope

0ubenji:
all wrong

Kingebukasblog, come help me solve this.

3. The journey back was 'similar', so it took the same time 150min=2&1/2hours.

7. "Nothing is wrong with it but you must admit that there is something wrong" - that is what is wrong with it.

1. "1" can be continuously halved till it gets to zero.

KingEbukasBlog:
His OP is suffused with logical fallacies and that's an inauspicious way to start an argument .

First logical fallacy: Strawman . The OP falsely represented the views of Christians so that he could be able to refute them - very pathetic . Of course his fellow atheists who liked his posts are either oblivious to this or they want to give the post a semblance of it being logical . This would make the readers draw false conclusions or have a pejorative perception of views held by Christians on the subject

Second logical fallacy : Shotgun argumentation . The OP presented so many arguments with the intent of overwhelming his opponent who would possibly not respond to all of them . Well winner01 did well by responding to all of them though they were fallacious . Observers would have thought we weren't capable of responding - a false conclusion or perception . Have you now seen why it is fallacious ?

His second post is just him try to salvage something , nothing more than that .

OK Sir!!!

0ubenji:
5, 6, 8 are wrong

5. Minimum of SSCE
6. Snip - because the rest involves movement
8. 6 months.

Wowwwwwww!!
I'm just speechless

Nice work.

KingEbukasBlog:
You dont get it Seriously bro ? Atheists purport themselves as the aforementioned and indeed stats have proven their claims are false .

I agree that some atheist will do that, but that is a chauvinistic and egocentric way of thinking.

In the real sense the aforementioned are as a result of one's effort.

KingEbukasBlog:
Exactly !!!!Exactly !!! Oh my God exactly!!!

Ab initio mundi , we as Christians have been way better than they'll ever be , wealthier , more accomplished , more distinguished . smarter just name it . There is no proof atheism is the better choice yet they want people to become atheists Where is the logic in that


Why would anyone want to join a losing side Ewwww

Atheism\irreligion\theism does not really have anything to do with wealth, smartness, etc
Those are as a result of one's efforts.

KingEbukasBlog:
Winner01 officially closed the thread with the excellent responses but watch the atheists preserver through their chagrin .

donffd officially addressed his silly logic.

Hackers would have also evolved by then to take down this supercomputers.

AdoptedSon:
Feran15, i wonder if electric kettle is allowed in the school. Incase, i need hot water to bath.

Yep, u can bring along an electric kettle.

ebiagtales:
my own is for 29 years. When I saw his claim, I contacted him and he told me how he stopped his own. Since then I have been following him up with mails and everything. Only his phone number he refused to give me.

Otem is an open person. He will always tell you how everything is going. He speaks his mind.

OK I've heard, I just thought the similarities were bizarre.

So you've encountered Eartum also?

ebiagtales:
I am Chinedu and I am the writer of the KING CHINEDU VERSION of the Christian bible. I am writing it for fun. So fvcck off! This man Otem taught me a method to stop my 29year bed-wetting. I was happy when it worked and I opened thread on nairaland to paste it twice. see one of the thread here: www.nairaland.com/3154354/thank-otem-showing-me-truth

You guys both had bed-wetting issue for the same number of years. That's weird.

KingEbukasBlog:
I've seen the first one before , the answer is "If I ask the other guard which door leads to hell, what will his answer be ?" . Both guards will point to heaven because the liar since he lies will point to heaven and the honest guard since he tells the truth will point to heaven

The second one

Let the weight of one brick be x

x = 1 + x/2

2x = 2 + x

x = 2kg

The fourth one is that since Boston is in New York so they are actually in the same city .

I dont even understand the third one , I don't think it is verisimilitudunous . An explanation'd be nice .

bien joué
The fourth one is not as easy as it seems if u dont know where boston is. [psst: i'm guilty ]

The third question is basically about a fly jumping(flying) from one train to the other until the two trains collide, knowing that this 2 trains are initially 200km apart and are coming at each other at 50km/hour. The fly flies at 75km/hour. So u are to calculate the distance the fly has covered before the collision.

solution:
Since all is equal, at collision(the middle), it will take 100km.
which means it took 2hours.
The fly speed 75km/hour
distance = speed * time
distance = 75*2
distance=150km

AmenRa1:
just imaging if they could heal Steven hawking the whole of science history will change!!! Think about it

I know right!!!!
I actually suggested that to kingebuka but he refuted it.

KingEbukasBlog:
How is this possible ? Remember deism inherently repudiates concepts from religion and we have science which studies nature - the creation of your god . Or wait ... philosophy ?

I said "not really".
If the universe was made by a noninterventionist creator, that is a being and not a nonliving matter as most theoretical physicists claim, then I don't think they can fully get how the universe was made.
Though I am open-minded, my point is as a result of my belief.

Kingebukasblog come here and solve this.

KingEbukasBlog:
@ 4kings

Hope we cool ?

Let's continue

Do you rely on science to determine how God did it ?

Not really.

KingEbukasBlog:
Pffttt ... And why haven't you convinced the atheists with that

What more do u expect me to say, I laid my OPINION once in a thread, dalaman said that he is not sure of god existence(agnostic), in another Hahn didn't agree, but required evidence.
Like I said this is my OPINION I don't impose it on anyone, like the theist, so back off!!!!

KingEbukasBlog:
Job , a man close to God's heart was inflicted with all kinds of ailments while God watched closely . So what's your point ?

Seriously, this is ur explanation.
The bible said if u have faith as little as a mustard seed, u can move mountain, how much more a man that had a full 18 hours chat with God.

Besides Yahweh allowed for that to happen in order to prove a point to Satan. But i thought the new testament said we now have more power than Satan through the blood of Christ. .

KingEbukasBlog:
Lmaoo . Clear the speck of sawdust from your eye first before you do same to another

wtf is speck of dust here.
My opinion came from the principle of cause and effect, if its rational u want.

KingEbukasBlog:
Smh ... you won't understand .. I just feel sorry for the atheists anyway ... so sorry for them .. Just let them not blame God when the time comes

You better wake up from that dream.
Even Andrew wommack, says he has never heard god speak directly to him, but oyedepo who had 18 hours vision with god, his wife has missed services cause of illness he couldn't heal. smh.

KingEbukasBlog:
@ emboldened text The joke is totally on you .

You believe a non interventionist God exists . Where is your evidence

Oh dear ... this is laughable

At least my evidences are drawn from my personal experiences with God . And since I know of God's existence , there's the "afterlife" . So mine is not based on ratiocination .

I can remember telling you like 5 times that it was my opinion, I wasn't imposing it on you, was I?
*****
"Personal experiences with god", is the working of your subconscious-conscious mind.

johnydon22:
One can deduct by studying every idea and concept afterlife [paradises] these are projections of man's greed and unsated lust for the things he regard good and wanting but yet very elusive in an existence that is sadly limited.

Precisely

johnydon22:
So your argument is based on : the dread experienced by a human mind when faced with the cold eventuality and inevitability of death and a severe want and need for a soft landing psychological pillow, an escape route to derive comfort in this cold fate - this led to the him irrationally concieving the thought of living again [in a life he wouldn't have to face same dread again (immortality)]

Exactly what you can call "wishful thinking".
It is irrational to believe in things without evidence.
The predominant explanation for this, is "another realm". But how can u believe in a realm u've not gone to unless its just a formation of belief to suit your desire.

Scholar8200:
Since you said Jesus,Paul etc quoted therefrom, perhaps you should show where.

Jesus quoted the book more than 7times, check mat5:5- Enoch5:7&6:9, John5:22-Enoch69:27, mat26:24-Enoch38:2. Pls google d rest!, note that the book was in existence b4 jesus birth and the bible said jesus read scriptures.

Scholar8200:
I believe this must be one of the reasons why even the jews rejected those books!

Nope, the Jews(Judaism sect) have not rejected this book and some other apocryphas. This book was rejected in the council of nicea, by ur early church fathers.

Scholar8200:
No! Like you have in many tribes, history , sometimes unwritten, is transferred orally down the line. Enoch's prophecy matched the message by , "Methuselah' that destruction was coming. Hence, as long as the name is remembered, the events surrounding it too will not be forgotten! Hence, the book of Enoch was an author grabbing that aspect and fleeing with his imaginations.

Seriously, how does this explanation dispute my point

Scholar8200:
Which?

How do YOU distinguish an inspired book from one not inspired?