Kagarko:

Islam is the only true religion on Earth Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow.

Amujale:



The authors of Abrahamic religious text are liars and fakers, and were Roman aristocrats.

Stop thinking in the terms of Peter, John, Mark, e.t.c because they are all fictional characters invented by the authors of Abrahamic text.

Daejoyoung:

You are not even dealing with what l provided. No one judges ancient texts like that, else we wouldn't be doing history.
lf you say the author of that text was a liar, who was he deceiving there? how could he be speaking of a peter that didn't exist then? what purpose would that serve seeing that people then could verify his claim?

Daejoyoung:

You are not even dealing with what l provided. No one judges ancient texts like that, else we wouldn't be doing history.
lf you say the author of that text was a liar, who was he deceiving there? how could he be speaking of a peter that didn't exist then? what purpose would that serve seeing that people then could verify his claim?

Daejoyoung:

You are not even dealing with what l provided. No one judges ancient texts like that, else we wouldn't be doing history.
lf you say the author of that text was a liar, who was he deceiving there? how could he be speaking of a peter that didn't exist then? what purpose would that serve seeing that people then could verify his claim?

Amujale:


Christianity was manufactured in the first century CE during the reign of the Flavians Titus, and Domitian.

Especially, the Roman Emperor Titus Vespasianus Augustus.

Some historians go far as pointing out the fact that it isnt a coincidence that the biblical movement of the Jesus character mirrors the military campaign of Emperor Titus himself.

Again, dont take my word for that, research that your self or watch the world reknowned historian Joseph Atwill disect an excerpt from his own book 'The Flavian Signature'.

Statement by Joseph Atwill - excerpt from "The Flavian Signature"


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=omi6lN5b0Ic


In his lecture, Joseph Atwill shows a comprehensive blue print on the typology the authors of Abrahamic religious text used during their invention of the Jesus character.

Proof Romans Invented the Jesus Character - The Flavian Signature.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4UqG8w7ezUQ

There are simply no authentic historical evidence of Christianity prior to the first century CE.

Amujale:



The Romans manufactured the Christian bible in order to passify a militaristic rebel group that existed in Palestinian regions.

Then the same Romans would use these same weapons of mass desteuction on their own peasants.

The Christian bible is false, fake and counterintuitive.

Daejoyoung:

lf the Romans manufactured the christian bible, then how does it make sense that they in turn persecuted the Christians for 300years, throwing them to the lions and with a zeal to eradicate them?

Your theory makes no sense, you think about it and stop sprouting outdated antichristian nonsense that is hard to sell.

Maximus69:


Please tell Amujale o.

Romans fabricated the whole story themselves and at the same time they're the very ones who killed those faithful men according to the same fabrication!

I just can't understand why/how a right thinking person could be arguing so blindly!

Daejoyoung:


Lol, if the Romans were to even create a religion, why would they create a religion that calls for dedication to a jew for that matter and not even caesar or one of the Roman gods?

Jews were Roman Slaves, yet Romans would then turn around to create a religon so dedicated to a slave? l wonder how some people think.

Amujale:



The Romans invented the Jesus character out of the plagiarisation of older religious characters.

It has been proven beyond reasonable doubt that first century Roman aristocrats invented the Jesus character at the order of their Emperor so as to passify a militaristic rebel group based in the Palestinian region.

There were no Jews during the first century CE, Judaism was manufactured around the 14 - 15th century.

Anyone who states otherwise is a liar and faker.

The Israelite story is fake.

Daejoyoung:

And yet thesame Romans even from Nero were killing the Christian?.

Many of us dont realise the fact that the Jesus story is fake due the fact that we tend not to understand the genre of Abrahamic religious text.

Daejoyoung:


Lol, if the Romans were to even create a religion, why would they create a religion that calls for dedication to a jew for that matter and not even caesar or one of the Roman gods?

Jews were Roman Slaves, yet Romans would then turn around to create a religon so dedicated to a slave? l wonder how some people think.

Amujale:


The Romans manufactured Christianity in the first century CE in order to passify a militaristic rebel group that existed in the Palestinian regions at the time.

Then these same Romans used these weapons of mass destruction on their own peasants.

A reputable historian once said in a public statement; Atwill said in his disection of the book he authored "Ceasars Messiah" - The Flavian signature:



The authors of the Christian bible mimmicked the genre of the people they set out to passify.

That is to say, the Romans repackaged the local stories of the militaristic rebel group and using the genre that their own authors popularised; repackaged other local and foreign stories, characters and typologies and had themselves the Christian bible.


Question:

What is the genre that they adapted from the writters of the militarised rebel group?


Answer:

Typology, in that they used a trick made famous by the people from the Palestine region known as Euhemerism.

Euhemerism is an approach to the interpretation of mythology whereby mythological accounts are presumed to have originated from real historical events or personages.

The Moses - Jesus connection is a prime example of how euhemerism used to work for the authors of the Christian bible, whilst the Jesus - Titus connection is another.

They euhemerised the Mose character aswell; placing their fictitious character inside of ancient Egypt.

Note: There are no records of a Moses characrer in all of ancient Egyptian history.


The authors of the Christian bible have alerted us to the fact that Euhemerism is multifaceted.

The authors of the Chrustian bible euhemerised their fictitious character in order to create a fabrication out of a true story, aswell as euhemerising their fictitious characters in order to try and validate an initial falsehood.

Again the Moses - Jesus connection is a perfect example whereby the authors of the Christian bible attempt to use the Jesus character to validate the Moses character.

They failed woefully.

Moses is a fictitious character and so is Jesus.

Plus, the attempt by the authors of Abrahamic religious text to euhemerise the Jesus chatacter into the Moses situation and vice-versal, has also failed them.

The Christian bible is not what it claims to be, instead it's an unsafe, unethical and unauthorised bibliography, a compilation of various ancient philosophies, characters and typologies; the contents of which have been repackaged, directly copied, plagiarised, sexed-up or outrightly fabricated.

9jaStarMedia:
Reno Omokri in his contribution to Maraji’s post of Jesus being the only way to heaven, stated that Jesus is not God. Reno Omokri stated that Jesus is not God but only came to show us the way to God.
He wrote;
Let me shock you. Yeshua came to show us the Way to God because He, Yeshua, is the ONLY Way to God. He is the everlasting Melchizedek High Priest. The Mediator between God and man. But He is NOT the Almighty God. That is a European concept.


Yeshua never claimed to be God. Many Christians read John 1:1 in The Bible (not the Scriptures) and use that to claim that Yeshua is God. I will urge you to get the original Greek Scriptures (see the attached picture) and even if you can’t read Greek, just study that verse. This is the verse in pure Greek (?ν ?ρχ? ?ν ? λ?γος, κα? ? λ?γος ?ν πρ?ς τ?ν θε?ν, κα? θε?ς ?ν ? λ?γος). Here is the verse in Latin, which may be easier for laymen (In principio erat Verbum, et Verbum erat apud Deum, et Deus erat Verbum). Notice the words DEUM and DEUS are used to describe the first and second mention of God.
Although you may not be able to read the Greek, what John 1:1 says when translated without changing the words used for God is this “in the beginning was the Word and the Word was with Theon and the Word was Theos”. The original Scriptures did not use the same word for the first mention of God and the second mention. The word used in the first mention is THEON (which refers to the Almighty. The word in the second mention is THEOS which is what is used to refer to Yeshua.
This is why Scripture says “my people perish for lack of knowledge”-Hosea 4:6.
#YeshuaNotJesus
Jesus is not God - Reno Omokri
LABELS: Gossip

https://www.9jastarmedia.com/2019/08/jesus-is-not-god-reno-omokri.html

Emeth:


John 10:30 says "i and my father are one."
Reno Omokri trying to convince otherwise is the same with the Jews trying to stone Him for making that proclamation. We shouldn't be deceived by some individuals presenting themselves to be of higher learning. For true wisdom cometh from God...

Maximus69:

...But outrightly making unreasonable assertions on social media...

Maximus69:


....never heard of John 8:32..

9jaStarMedia:
Reno Omokri in his contribution to Maraji’s post of Jesus being the only way to heaven, stated that Jesus is not God. Reno Omokri stated that Jesus is not God but only came to show us the way to God.
He wrote;
Let me shock you. Yeshua came to show us the Way to God because He, Yeshua, is the ONLY Way to God. He is the everlasting Melchizedek High Priest. The Mediator between God and man. But He is NOT the Almighty God. That is a European concept.


Yeshua never claimed to be God. Many Christians read John 1:1 in The Bible (not the Scriptures) and use that to claim that Yeshua is God. I will urge you to get the original Greek Scriptures (see the attached picture) and even if you can’t read Greek, just study that verse. This is the verse in pure Greek (?ν ?ρχ? ?ν ? λ?γος, κα? ? λ?γος ?ν πρ?ς τ?ν θε?ν, κα? θε?ς ?ν ? λ?γος). Here is the verse in Latin, which may be easier for laymen (In principio erat Verbum, et Verbum erat apud Deum, et Deus erat Verbum). Notice the words DEUM and DEUS are used to describe the first and second mention of God.
Although you may not be able to read the Greek, what John 1:1 says when translated without changing the words used for God is this “in the beginning was the Word and the Word was with Theon and the Word was Theos”. The original Scriptures did not use the same word for the first mention of God and the second mention. The word used in the first mention is THEON (which refers to the Almighty. The word in the second mention is THEOS which is what is used to refer to Yeshua.
This is why Scripture says “my people perish for lack of knowledge”-Hosea 4:6.
#YeshuaNotJesus
Jesus is not God - Reno Omokri
LABELS: Gossip

https://www.9jastarmedia.com/2019/08/jesus-is-not-god-reno-omokri.html

Daejoyoung:


These are old claims and are no longer taken seriously by scholars, because the so called similarities have been blown out of proportion. Please do more research on this matter, l'm surprised you believe this.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://evidenceandanswers.org/article/pagan-connection-did-christianity-borrow-from-mystery-religions/&ved=2ahUKEwiNtuCnwKTmAhXM26QKHYE3DmwQFjAPegQIBRAB&usg=AOvVaw0h-R_FZMjZwh8secKWvh9V&cshid=1575754874425

Amujale:


I challenge you to point out one falsehood made in any of my previous post.

Instead of you to consider what has been said here with reason, you attempt to cpmpound your own ignorance.

Amujale:


The Christian bible is an unsafe, unethical and unauthorised piece of writing; anyone who uses it as a point of reference is highly mistaken.

The Christian bible isnt an authentic piece of writing.

Maximus69:

...But outrightly making unreasonable assertions on social media...

Amujale:


I challenge you to point out one falsehood made in any of my previous post.

Instead of you to consider what has been said here with reason, you attempt to cpmpound your own ignorance.

Maximus69:


[s]Before any write up could be considered, right thinking individuals always compare the topic and introduction.

If the topic is interesting and the introduction makes sense, then only lazy ones will ignore such comment no matter how lengthy it is.

After reading through, the next thing any intellectual will do is to think of what benefit this will bring to the society at large, that's when you should expect normal people to start thinking on what to do with such a writeup.

But where you the author remain anonymous, no evidence to back your claims and you can't even present another better offer, then your lengthy epistle becomes nonsense and ingredients! [/s]

Maximus69:

...But outrightly making unreasonable assertions on social media...

Amujale:


I challenge you to point out one falsehood made in any of my previous post.

Maximus69:

That could only be accepted if you can present something of higher value than the Christian Bible.

Amujale:


The Christian bible has zero credibility or value therefore to find something that is higher isnt even much of a task.

Look out of your window and ask Joe of the street, does Africa have a history?

History is what everyone needs to concentrate our focus.

We need to get rid of the falsehood peddled by the Abrahamic religions and focus our attention on real history.


Question:

Where can i find real history, and what kind of history should really be of my concern?


Answer:

Africa



All the histories of the world are proof that the Abrahamic religions are fake.

Asian history tells us that the Christian Bible, Quran and the Torah are fake.

African history tells us the Christian Bible, Quran and the Torah are fake.

European history tells us the The Christian Bible and the Torah are both fake.

Since the Christian bible's motive is to attempt to replace real history with its fakery, its only advisable for anyone to peel away the layers of fakery and actual focus on the real history that Abrahamic religious text attempts to hide from us

91% of African history isnt being studied by Africans.

And yet, humanity began in Africa and then our ancestors went on to populate the rest of the world.

Africans are the first people to explore and populate all the other 'continents.

Africans invented paper and they invented the ink pen.

Africans discovered the concepts of literacy.

Africans discovered the concepts of numeracy.

African sailors are the firsr to have circumnavigate the seven seas.

African architects and engineers are the first to explore the concepts of aerodynamics.

Civilization began in Africa and then it proceeded to trickle out to the rest of the world.

Everyone currently living on planet Earth all descend from African ethnicities.

These are the truths we need to be mining and cease to invest our positive energy on the fakery coming out of the ancient Arabian fundamentalist and or Eurocentric ideologies that are designed to benefit other people.

Daejoyoung:

Well l agree with you that studying African history would have been worthwhile...

Amujale:


Question:

Where can i find real history, and what kind of history should really be of my concern?


Answer:

Africa

Amujale:

The above response is inconsequential to the direction of discussion. Let me remind you where our discussion is at.
Its either you PUT UP or SHUT UP.
Follow up your initial claim, once you refuse or shy away from using genuine evidence to back them up , we will have to accept that you are a liar and a faker.

Daejoyoung:

...but we have very little in terms of books and documented religious writings, we have more of oral traditions rather...
.

Amujale:


That is what i used to think until i found the writings of genuine African historians similar to Cheikh Anta Diop, Paul Barton, Dr J Hendrik Clarke, Wole Soyinka, Chunua Achebe, Nnamdi Azikwe, W.E.B. Du Bois, Fela Anikulapo Kuti e.t.c .

Aswell as, even more important still, learning, studying with an open mind and defending the genuine principles of our own philosophies in order that we may be able to successfully say to ourselves that we are contributing to our rich and relevant legacy.

Amujale:


Well I agree with you aswell that studying African history is worthwhile and would like to add that its also indicative; more of a perquisite to the effort that ought to be awarded into making our world a better place.