5minsmadness's Posts
Nairaland Forum › 5minsmadness's Profile › 5minsmadness's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 (of 187 pages)
Wisdomiskey and the other fellow pls carry your wahala go another thread Biko. Any further attempts at derailing will be reported to the mods. |
RobinHez:Why should it? Was anything derogatory mentioned? |
capricun:They are even tired of him self. Next thing he will draw you into an argument then when he see he's losing he will call the mods. Ignore him biko. |
wisdomiskey:Ignore him. You know he craves attention. Meanwhile I just created a new thread, you can check it out. |
Women are the weaker sex. This is common knowledge although in recent times feminism and other male apologist groups have tried to blur this fact in order to paint a more politically correct picture for the sake of 'equality' which is all the rave in the modern world right now. But the truth is that women are the weaker sex and below are just a few reasons. Muscle mass: Men naturally have more muscle mass than women with the average woman having just up to 52% as much muscle mass and thus strength as the average man. Muscle number: Men have more muscles than women. this again translates to increased physical strength on the part of the man as compared to his female counterpart . The Journal of applied physiology records that men have an average of 72.6pounds of muscle as compared to 46.2 pounds of muscle in women. Blood levels: Men have a higher PCV(blood level) than women. 40-52% in men as compared to women 35-47%. Note that erythropoietin which is responsible for production of blood is equal in both sexes. Testosterone: For those who have not heard of this hormone before, it is what makes a man a man. It is responsible for strength, enhanced sex drive, aggressiion and decisive action. It is sixteen times higher in males than females. Nuff said. The act of coitus: In the actof sex, no matter the position you want to take, females are the receptors, the receptive ones, while males are the invaders, their actions are invasive. This is a main reason why the older laws were hesitant about accepting that males can be raped as well because male rape cannot be seen as being physically invasive. Of course such arguments have been quelled since the introduction of the DiIdo and Strap=on which are actually designed to represent the male genitals which again supports male dominance. Brain size: The average male brain is 10%larger than that of the female and this lends support to the fact that men have a higher visual-spatial ability, cognition and navigation. Males also excel at quantitative problem solving, and mental rotation, or tasks involving the underlying cognitive processes of maintaining and manipulating a visual image in working memory . However this does not mean that females are dumb, and the pacifist argument of if brain size was what mattered then elephants would be the ones ruling the world came up. Of course this argument does not negate the cognitive abilities of the male as indicated above but was placed as a kind of pacification for feminists and the female of the species in general. There are other differences that show the male is the stronger of the species but I will like to stop here as I have a lecture to attend. What does this mean for us males? If women are the weaker of the species then we have a responsibility to take care of them. We have a responsibilty to love and protect them, not lord it over them or maltreat or beat them. Policies should be put in place that consider the females frail state and not policies to encourage the delusion that men and women are the same. We should be seen to be taking care of our mothers, sisters and daughters and paying particular attention to them because our strentgth is our resposibity as men. Fathers should be the administrators and protectors and guardians of the family unit and not laid back or wating for the woman to bring home the bacon while the man sits on his lazy ass. It is the woman's duty to cater to the home front, true. But it is the man's duty to ensure that that home front is condusive enough for the woman to live in happily and cater to contentedly. Thank you. http://homepages.luc.edu/~hweiman/GenderDiffs.html http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8477683 http://www.livestrong.com/article/246036-how-much-more-muscle-mass-does-a-male-have-than-a-female/ https://www.healthcare.uiowa.edu/path_handbook/rhandbook/test955.html |
tearoses:What? Hmmm. Maybe I'll watch from the sidelines afterall.... |
SAMBARRY:Make me! ![]() |
SAMBARRY:When I was in secondary school there was a game the guys and girls used to play in the hostel. A guy would deliberately go into a girl's room (there were up to 12girls in the room so it was more of a mini dorm actually) and wait for the girls to threaten him to leave. Of course he would refuse and next thing the girls would gather round, lift him off his feet(they were successful more often than not) and bodily throw him out of the room. Both parties benefited in that the girl conquerors exhibited their physical prowess and the boy victim 'tapped current' from all the girls grabbing him in different places. This was repeated at least three times a night for different boys every Friday and Saturday ![]() I don't know where that memory popped up from ![]() |
tearoses:NO way! ![]() I've always wondered what it is ladies gist about. I'm staying put at least for the 17pages u guys lodged in our thread ![]() |
So this kain thread exists and u ladies have been hoarding our boyz thread? ![]() |
shaiba:1000000 Likes |
kallmemrB:The guy is on a roll tonight ![]() |
Vanquay:Why |
freecocoa:oh yes they were. More suitable to talk about spiritual things indeeed, how about now that women now own ministries and are pastors, what changed? Did God suddenly make this generation of women more suitable for spiritual things? Please give me the list of the women teachers/preachers who were in abundance.No God did not change. It was man who changed these things to please man, to appear politically correct. And yetmary magdalene was the first to proclaim the risen Christ. If God had any bias towards women he wouldnt have appeared to a woman first or allowed it to be documented as such. Is an all knowing God not supposed to know that rape would affect the woman terribly and that subjecting her to a life of misery with her attacker is not only f00lish but evil? So he doesn't give a rat's a$$ about the woman na.I gave you an explanation for this. If you are not satisfied with it then thats your problem. It was better the man marry her and take care of her than she be left desolate and alone and probably starve to death. Please also bring the list of men punished specifically for mistreating their women.What has GOd not being human got to do with his wanting to reason with his creation? If He is to reason with you that means he will bring himself down to your level. And thats a very very low place to be anyway. The heart of man is selfish and full of wickedness. So it has been since the fall of adam. I'm not a bible scholar, I leace such things for hiswordxray, or in your spare time you can read it up.But here's the ones I rmemebr offhead Genesis 38:9. Onan wanted to use tamar for his sexual pleasure and God punished him. The gospel of Mary Magdalene Esther rescuing the Israelites(Book of Esther) Judith rescing the isrealites (Book of Judith) Susanna's virtue triumphs and the men who wanted to take advantage of her punished(Book of susanna) The Daughters of Zelophehad who spoke out and thier requests were granted Titus 2:3-5 Older women likewise are to be reverent in their behavior, not malicious gossips nor enslaved to much wine, teaching what is good. Cant think of any more right now. |
freecocoa:Lol That's your human reasoning. God is above humans. They are not above him. Human's change the way they see themselves. GOD never changes.Not the way we change anyway. Would you prefer the jewish women have sex during their menses. Do you know a woman can actually throw an embolus and die if she engages in sexual intercourse during her menstruation, not talk of the increased risk of transmission of infection, not to talk of the fact that its actually disgusting to have sex during menses ? There was a very good reason for a woman to be called 'unclean'during that peroid. Oh and men had their moments of 'uncleanness' too. Men were the ones entrusted with more responsibility and were/are less easily moved emotionally than women. So yes they were more suited to talk about spiritual things, they couldnt talk about other stuff cos they mostly didnt own them anyway. But even then cases abound in the bible of women who spoke up and were recognised. When a woman got raped her honour was gone. Most time no other man would be willing to marry her and she would be left alone with no one to fend for her. It only stood to reason that the one who was caught raping her would be made to marry her and in so doing take an oath to take care of her. It might sound primitive now because in modern times a woman can take care of her self better than in those primitive days when life was cheap and one could be sold into slavery or killed by the enemy at any moment. and so on and so forth. And even though women were regarded as being made for men it doent mean all themen were beasts and raping and punishing the women daily. That is a sexist view of all men being beasts. In fact the bible admonished men to love thier wives and on more than one occassion men were punished for ill treating thier women. Even today women are being used, nothing much has changed and you cant blame God or the bible for it. |
freecocoa:Most folk would say I'm sexist. They would say I'm doing this cos I consider women as being weak and not being able to take care of themselves. Being 'sexist' is a modern word. It holds no place in the ancient world. If not u would say the whole of the old testament was sexist when actually they were simply living life as they knew it and taking care of their female folk. To your topic. Angels are males. There's no dichotomy in heaven, no gender appropriation, no racial profiling. It's not like nowadays when they make female action heroes to try and please the female/feminist folk. Angels have all been 'males'. It's not man that will come with a new idea and tell God what to do. There is no political correctness in heaven. Anyone telling u angels are sex less are just trying to be polite to the female gender. It doesn't mean God 'hates' females, on the contrary it shows that the female of the species was a special breed. |
freecocoa:I give up my seat during lectures for my female counterparts and walk on the side of the road closest to oncoming vehicles when walking with a lady. Am I sexist? |
freecocoa:And what if he is? |
cococandy:Nice try at trying to cover you blunder. ![]() We all learn everyday Superfecundation describes a situation where the eggs are fertilized by sperm from separate incidences of sexual intercourse. In a case where a woman has sex with different partners, the twins could have different fathers. The appropriate term to describe this situation is heteropaternal superfecundation http://multiples.about.com/od/funfacts/a/Heteropaternal.htm This is what edwife was talking about. It's an even rarer subset of fraternal twins which on its own has a prevalence of 3 per 1000live births which can thus be classified as an aberration in statistics. You called me foolish. If I call u a congenital dumbass you'll take offence ![]() |
@cococandy Kindly read up "heteropaternal superfecundation" which is what edwife was talking about and consider modifying your post ![]() |
cococandy:Do you realise you just admitted to your mother having sex with TWO different men within the same period and you being an offspring of one of them? ![]() |
njokusboy:"Cumbucket" comes to mind ![]() Actually the ladies should be offended by this thread ![]() But thier sentiment won't let them see it ![]() |
LordReed:Why should you go out when you already have loving woman by your side? Or don't you have self control? |
LordReed:But the arguments on both threads are not at par at all. You just strung a lot of illogical statements together backed up by little or no facts and presented it as a counter-offensive. A very bad one at that. Like someone said and like I thought previously one would think you were advocating for Better luck next time. ![]() |
@LordReed I now see why you are being so emotional... Your past exercise at conception just yielded fruit ![]() Congrats man. ![]() |
LordReed:Have u eaten this morning What is polygamy if not a subset of marriage ![]() |
edwife:Chases her away with broom ![]() A very rare occurrence anyway. Definitely an aberration of nature. Now git! You'll spoil the fun ![]() |
bukatyne:@bolded. Answer it yourself. Be honest. Was man designed to impregnate several women at once? Was a woman designed to be Impregnated by several men at once? Give an honest answer if u can pls. |
LordReed:I appreciate a good banter. Really I do. But your thread fell flat on its face from page 1. I thought it was a joke last night till I took a second look this morning and saw u were actually being serious. It's like comfort food for ![]() Anyways I try not to ba a spoilsport in comfort parties like these. Have fun ![]() |
LordReed:Let's follow your logic then. How many eggs are there to merge with? ![]() This attempt to 'turn the logic on me' is stillborn at best ![]() |
bukatyne:@bolded ends the discussion! A woman can conceive for only one man. A man can cause the conception of many women! QED! Thread closed! ![]() |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 (of 187 pages)





