Acehart's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Acehart's Profile › Acehart's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 (of 38 pages)
MaxInDHouse:Yes! |
DappaD:Yes, it is I. That was my view for the last few years. But I am not stagnant. I studied to know the truth and this is the truth: Michael isn’t Jesus. |
Barristter07:Maybe I am confused. But I leave you with these definitions (in pictures). For the Lord Himself will descend from heaven with an order, accompanied by the proclamation of the archangel and then the trumpet of God, and the dead in Christ will rise first.
|
Barristter07:Barrister, the word “with“ in English language means accompany(ing). If you look at the Greek Bible, you would see this order: 1. The Christ gives the command. 2. The Archangel raises his voice. 3. The Trumpet of God is sounded. This is the reason I asked you if you knew the meaning of “with”. Paraphrasing that verse according to the intention of the writer, it is: For the Lord Himself will descend from heaven with an order, accompanied by the proclamation of the archangel and then the trumpet of God (is heralded) and the dead in Christ will rise first. You asked if I am happy by the knowledge of this? Of course. I hoped you would have been happier than me.
|
Barristter07:The secret to understanding this text so that no one will fall into error is the word “shout”. If you get it, you will be the happiest man today. |
Barristter07:Sir, do you know the meaning of “with”? Where there may be any misunderstanding of the right meaning of the word “with” which is best fit for the text, let’s look at the Greek bible in the picture below for better understanding:
|
Barristter07:Hello. I know you know the function of commas in the English grammar. I would like you to permit me ask you these: What is the place of the trumpet? Is the Lord a trumpet? I ask this because you infer that from this verse, the Lord is the archangel; is the Lord the trumpet as well? I also want to ask you this: what function of the comma made you arrive at your conclusion? |
Barristter07:John 5:27...because He is the Son of Man. John 5:28 Do not marvel at this; for an hour is coming, in which all who are in the tombs will hear His voice, John 5:29 and will come forth; those who did the good deeds to a resurrection of life, those who committed the evil deeds to a resurrection of judgment. |
BlueAngel444:Praise the Lord |
BlueAngel444:Frame your questions properly then. |
BlueAngel444:It’s just an exposition. When writing, it isn’t out of place to put the thoughts of renowned scholars in ones exposition. You could be quoted tomorrow, as one very knowledgeable; this shouldn’t be seen as an error or an aberration especially if your thoughts agree with the scriptures. Frame your questions properly then. |
Emusan:Very true. This attribute of examining and testing the heart and minds is seen in the Holy Spirit; we see Him knowing the intent of the hearts of Ananias and his wife. The Holy Spirit knows the mind of God as well. We know Satan is domiciled in religion as an angel of light; therefore, he would shroud the true intent of God through false interpretation of the word; his time will be cut short, hallelujah! Thanks for your effort to enlighten our minds. |
jesusjnr2020:The teaching of Michael as the Christ is not peculiar to the JW alone. Some ‘white-garment‘ churches teach so as well. Many churches/organizations have been wrong in many doctrines; but as time progressed, they changed their views for the better. Let’s just pray and hope that they come to the full knowledge of the word of God so that our joy may be full. |
WoundedLamb:He is my brother; he is yours too. His real name is Boanerges. You seem like one with a good head on his shoulders; it would be nice if you posted a lot of good things in this section. It’s horrifying seeing what the mods post on front page as Christian topics. It would be nice if someday “WoundedLamb” flooded this section with topics of divine concern that there wouldn’t be any reason for those men employed as mods to post airheaded topics that have nothing to do with Christian living. I hope you begin today and surely, if it is nice, I would comment without any air of aggression, sneering or opposition. |
WoundedLamb:I understand your reservation: topics like this just heaps dogma upon dogma that doesn’t lead to salvation. However, you should understand that if men use the scriptures to justify the unjustifiable, they would use every medium available to them to express unbalanced theology. If it takes a little yeast to work through the whole batch of dough, false teachers would work and the outcome would be devastating. This writeup is to confound them; and it was also posted in the hopes that they would change and stop their divisive ways, which they do in subtlety, not through topics but through conversation which you may not be privy to. I have taken your advice into consideration. I would see how I would write or post write ups on love for God and for men. |
MuttleyLaff:I wonder why a moniker bearing the name “wounded lamb” would have such a reaction. ![]() |
WoundedLamb:Ah! you should see many a Nigerian who go for visa interviews and speak so much about a county, district, town or city in the country (which they haven’t been to) they intend to go to. Wouldn’t it be strange if those who see themselves as pilgrims in this world can’t speak of the (heavenly) city they intend to go to after their sojourn is ended? If it is the way of the people of this world to speak of the culture of foreign lands gloriously, it shouldn’t be strange to hear them speak of culture of celestial lands gloriously. |
Cc: Muttleylaff |
Is Michael the Christ? A controversial theory suggests that Michael was the pre-incarnate Christ. He is given the title of “prince” and shown to be a “protector of the people Israel.” Yet, “the one who protects Israel” is God Himself, says Don Stewart. “My help comes from the LORD” (Psalm 121:2-4). Many people argue that if God protects Israel, and Michael protects Israel, they must be one in the same. Moreover, when Christ returns, He will come with “the voice, or cry of command, of the archangel” (1 Thessalonians 4:16). But, as Stewart points out, Michael is one of the chief princes of angels. Jesus is never given the title “chief prince” among His many names which include “King of Kings and Lord of Lords” (Revelation 19:16). Michael is like the “legatus Augusti proparetore” who “commanded an entire province.” He is one of several commanders in the angelic army. He is not unique. Jesus is the one and only Son of God. In Matthew 28:18, Jesus tells His disciples, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me.” This cannot be said of the Archangel Michael who, as Jude tells us, could not rebuke Satan; only God can do that. As one with the Father, Christ can rebuke the Devil also. The real power is Christ’s authority to forgive sins, demonstrated by His sacrifice, by submission to Roman punishment, and His victory over death. Angels accomplish what humans imagined Christ would do — defeat armies — while only Christ could surpass the limits of human imagination and desire by accomplishing victory over what matters most — separation from God because of our sin. Who Is the Archangel Michael to Us? There really are angels; Scripture points to their existence too often to deny that God made them, and they serve a purpose in God’s kingdom. Angels are “mighty ones” who work for God (Psalm 103:20) using His authority and the power He gave them to fight Satan. We see that in the verses cited above. Wayne Grudem tells us that angels deliver messages, “carry out some of God’s judgments,” act as an “example” to us in their worship of and obedience to God, and “patrol the earth as God’s representatives.” They act on behalf of God’s people as per God’s command. This should create a sense of wonder; that there are angels around us doing God’s will, invisible to humans. Elisha and his servant were surrounded by the force of Syria, and Elisha’s servant was terrified. “Do not be afraid, for those who are with us are more than those who are with them” (2 Kings 6:16). Elisha could see what was invisible to most people: God’s forces at work on behalf of His people. Angels are at work around us, and it is tempting to become more enthralled with these beautiful, mighty creatures than with the Son of God. Even as he fights Satan during the end times, however, the Archangel Michael will not be as powerful as the Messiah. We see Michael as a sword-carrying warrior against demons, but the blade we are most concerned with as Christians is the sword of the Word, an essential piece of the “full armor of God” (Ephesians 6). What Does This Mean? One must not worship anyone other than the Lord for, as John Gilhooly reminds us, “to which of the angels did God ever say, “You are my Son; today I have become your Father”? (Hebrews 1:5). “It is bad doctrine that makes creatures secure by creatures.” The Bible repeatedly “promises the very presence of God by the Spirit through faith. We ought to take comfort in the eternal God and his everlasting arms (Deuteronomy 33:27), not the arms of angels.” -Candice Lucey (2020) |
MaxInDHouse:Okay sir |
MaxInDHouse:What presentation? Does one play music for the deaf? |
Dtruthspeaker: Dtruthspeaker:If you can afford it, just go by air. The 45 mins flight will delight you. |
Janosky:Hello, I have noticed a lot of people don’t read on this forum. They skim through and speak like they have comprehended. This is another case and in respect, I’ll be silent. |
Janosky:Hi. Hope you had a very great day and having a nice evening? Do know what? I have not wrapped my mind concerning the homosexuality topic. Regarding Muttleylaff’s opinion, I don’t know what they are- I did not follow that topic. But I’ll like to cast my gaze on Matthew 19:12, in the hopes that may find a string that ties homosexuality to the text. 1. Some are born eunuchs. 2. Some were made eunuchs. 3. Some people make themselves eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom. Earlier, Jesus’ narrative centered on marriage; he went on to set a higher standard regarding marriage and divorce than that enacted in the Ordinance of Moses; and refuting the edicts set by the rabbinical schools of those days. Only those given to stomach the law of God, ab initio, would heed his words. Summarily, this is Jesus’ definition of marriage: marriage is for a man and woman; they must be faithful, loving and easily overlook offenses - a bond never to be broken. That discourse centered on marriage until Christ spoke of those who could stomach his saying. Why? Marriage is sexual in nature. Of course, a male eunuch wouldn’t venture into marriage except we have something similar to the tale of Missandei and Grey Worm. But was Jesus referring to a eunuch in the heart, rather than of the body? If this is the former, then the eunuch set number three would fit the bill. Many men who divorce their wives (for any reason at all v.3) do so because of sexual lust. If a man’s heart was circumcised or castrated, he would not find pleasure in sexual lusts. Therefore, sticking with one wife would be easy. So how does this relate to homosexuality? Homosexuality is chiefly about sexual preference rather than marriage. Research shows that the sexual desire of an average homosexual is far greater than that of heterosexuals: homosexuals can have as many as ten (or more) sexual encounters in a day. Promiscuity is the hallmark of homosexual relationships. When same sex marriages are scrutinized, fidelity doesn’t exist in all of them. Therefore, according to Jesus’ definition, marriage and homosexuality (same sex)should not be put in the same sentence. If Muttleylaff supported homosexuality, I’m sure he is man of reasoning and good reasoning would overturn his position. Try to talk him out of his present inclination in love and kindness. |
Dtruthspeaker:I wonder why you opposed that guy then- you said he was misleading; now you sound like him in advanced mode. However, you have not written anything wrong; you two are saying the same thing; but please try not to start a conversation through hostility. |
Mightyodi:Call that phone number |
MaxInDHouse: ![]() |
MaxInDHouse:Praise the Lord!!! |
Dtruthspeaker:Did I put up any interpretation? Doesn’t the scripture interpret itself? I’d like to ask you these questions from the parable of the Sower: 1. Did the seeds in his bag have the power to choose which soil they would fall on? 2. Did the seeds have the power to leap off from the type of soil they fell on to dissimilar soil? For example: did the seed that fell by the road side have the power to leap off onto the good soil? 3. Was there anywhere in the narrative where they was a change in mind in the sower for him to turn back and pick each seed that fell on poor soil and place them on the good soil? And a highway shall be there, and it shall be called the Way of Holiness; the unclean shall not pass over it. It shall belong to those who walk on the way; even if they are fools, they shall not go astray. -Isaiah 35:8 |
Janosky:Do you still need it? |
PastorAIO:I'd like to ask you this: Who is "you people"? Since you seem biased already, I have nothing to tell you than that question - Who is "you people"? |
Dtruthspeaker:They went out from us, but they did not really belong to us. For if they had belonged to us, they would have remained with us; but their going showed that none of them belonged to us. - 1 John 2:19 Are you sure that he is misleading anyone? If this part of the scripture isn't the word of God, then he is misleading people. They went out from us [seeming at first to be Christians], but they were not really of us [because they were not truly born again and spiritually transformed]; for if they had been of us, they would have remained with us; but they left us, so that it would be clearly shown that none of them are of us. - 1 John 2:19 |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 (of 38 pages)


so when number 2 happens .... the dead Rises , whose voice raised them ??

