Akin1212's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Akin1212's Profile › Akin1212's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (of 53 pages)
OkaiCorne:You started the insulting na. I was calm before you started throwing jabs. And then you became annoying again. Remember you said you wanted to release your Arsenal, and then I released my Barcelona too. ![]() The norm is not the image of God, there is no image since there is no God involved. That was a concept created by religionists and it doesn't apply where energy is involved. The spontaneity again, for clarity is not the property of energy that makes a decision. It is the property that makes it work without external influence. Please don't mix it. The property of energy making a decision is due to its randomness. But this randomness can result in anything. Luckily for us, we have been getting most of the good things because energy is sufficient. If energy is sufficient, you get the good ones, when it's not you get the bad ones. But energy doesn't decide which one we get by conscious authority. |
OkaiCorne:NO, The spontaneity is the property of energy to act on its own without anybody using it, but the unconsciousness and unintelligence are responsible. You see the vast majority of normal people is due to the choices made by other normal people. There are biochemical laws that guide these processes and it depends solely on energy. As against your point of the image of God. However, two normal parents can still give birth to a defected baby. But if the two normal humans were made in the image of God, were they not supposed to give birth to a child in the image of God? |
Graycoder:I wish we can meet sir. |
OkaiCorne:Yes, exactly. Just the mighty spontaneous, unconscious and unintelligent, eternal energy. But through a process much more deeper than what you can obviously understand and process. But basically, in your understanding. This is it. |
OkaiCorne:No, I considered your stance that all humans were created in the image of a God. So incompatibility does not have a say because even the parents would have been created in God's image too. No matter the choice we make. We would just be replicating God's image no matter the compatibility which should normally produce God's image. But that's not the case. However, If I am to consider Energy, I would put into consideration the unconscious and unintelligent nature of energy which gives room for incompatibility and errors. and hence different kinds of human forms. |
OkaiCorne:No, I considered your stance that all humans were created in the image of a God. So incompatibility does not have a say because even the parents would have been created in God's image too. No matter the choice we make. We would just be replicating God's image no matter the compatibility which should normally produce God's image. But that's not the case. However, If I am to consider Energy, I would put into consideration the unconscious and unintelligent nature of energy which gives room for incompatibility and errors. and hence different kinds of human forms. |
OkaiCorne:Don't be mistaken, I am not defining God, there's nothing like that. There's no puzzle to solve, there's only an explanation to give and understand. If a man like you, (intelligent + whole + Conscious) was created in the image of God(Intelligent + whole + conscious). In whose image is an imbecile_ man (unintelligent + broken + unconscious) made. God(Intelligent + whole + conscious) ? Energy is responsible for the good and bad things of life, and it didn't do it deliberately. |
OkaiCorne:Bros stop swindling yourself, I did not follow you and agree that energy plays a role in creation. Energy is responsible for everything. Energy is the Creator itself. On the second one, energy does not need any intellect and consciousness, it is spontaneous, not conscious. Energy did not deliberately create Bermuda triangle. Maybe your imaginary creator did though. Only you know that. |
OkaiCorne:You and I, and that blind man that was born blind plus that dude that was born without limbs, Siamese twins, that boy in India with 10 limbs too. What makes you different to them? Spontaneity and unintelligence of our mighty creator Energy. ![]() |
Graycoder:Please sir where do you live? I need to give you a trophy for opening the eyes of my unintelligent friend. Thank you very much sir He believed energy is spontaneous, yet he is crying somebody must use energy. I bet he does not know the meaning of spontaneity. |
OkaiCorne:You have answered your questions yourself bros. ![]() |
OkaiCorne:Runaway baby, you're going nowhere. Is giving verifiable and reasonable from the link you dropped here by yourself a conclusion? ![]() I understand your plight. |
OkaiCorne:You have to answer my questions before you can say anything. I have answered yours and the whole of Nairaland can see my answer. You hav been calling Nairaland to your rescue since, now do the justice needed. We are all waiting. |
OkaiCorne:Oga, I have answered your question above, do you want me to quote it? Akin1212: |
Graycoder:What will I do boss? OkaiCorne is very annoying. He has zero knowledge of Science, yet he knows so much about it. ![]() |
OkaiCorne:I'm really glad to know that you want to learn, but which of those energy listed do you know anything about? It's even good that you have started browsing for links again, I'm sure you will soon find the truth now. But please, answer my questions above on where we stand now. I have been able to thrash (with viable evidence) that your claims(the parallel universe and planes of existence) are false. So the former is a fiction and the latter is religious and unreal. Are we on the same page? I want to answer your questions once and for all, but these impediments won't let me. Let me know if we are on the same page. I will reveal secrets about energy and teach you about all the listed energies. |
OkaiCorne:I did not conclude, I verified it with viable points. Do you agree that it is NON EXISTENT IN SCIENCE and you will not scream it again? I need to know that we are progressing. Please answer. That the plain of existence and the parallel universe are not scientific and are nonexistent in real life. ![]() The answer to your question has been bolded in your question above. And you are the perfect example of what you ask for. If you want the meaning of spontaneity, I will explain it and put you through despite that you need a deep knowledge of science to understand I will still try best for you. You're really learning by answering your questions by yourself. Good work son. |
OkaiCorne:It's not a matter of what you want, nobody cares about that. It's a matter of what you are. A theist. I have proved you to be wrong on so many grounds. I have said it earlier, it's either you're pretending to be dumb or you're really dumb. And it's not even an insult but the truth. You have avoided questions since Sunday because you are scared. Now you are asking for explanations on energy. When you know nothing of this energy. Answer my questions first, and then I will come to your level to explain energy in details and how it works to you... First come. first serve. ; |
OkaiCorne:As usual, you have gone to browse again, keep browsing through what science invented and be saying it started as a hypothesis as if the hypothesis did not help your life. A result of your dumbness again. Someone who is not a scientist telling us how science works. Lol, you think science is your eternal creator? And How else will I tell a pile of dumbshit like you what energy can do since you can't realize it? ![]() A free soul who has a God is not a theist? Lol, please go and browse since it's your forte and search for the meaning of theism. It seem your foolhardiness extends to that department too. ![]() Whether you believe in the Bible, Koran, any other book or not. Once you believe in a God. You are a theist . learn that dumbass
|
OkaiCorne:Lol, I have pictorially dismissed your parallel universe claims, now you want me to lecture you on energy again. I would, seriously, if you understand the basics of energy and science very well. Maybe you should go and look for more links and when you can't process whatever you read, come here I will help you. But for now, I am not going to tell you what you cannot understand nor process. You will just drag me through your dumbshits again. [i]But let me give you a hint to ease your confusion, although you are not too intelligent, but thank energy for your existence. And let Nairaland theists keep coming, I will keep thrashing them as I have thrashed you. Every claim you brought up has been thrashed mercilessly, either by your own link or my intelligence. Besides, you have claimed that you are not a theist, I wonder why you are associating with the people of God now. Is it to save face?[/i] Adieu. |
OkaiCorne:Lol, you keep shooting yourself in the foot. Every link you've dropped here has one way or the other showed how dumb you are. Here is the screenshot of your link. They know fools like you will misunderstand multiverse as a parallel universe. I also know you have been thinking the multiverse is the same as a parallel universe. I already stated it that Stephen and I are on the same page when it comes to the multiverse, but on the parallel universe? No, because it doesn't exist in science. They specifically omitted the term "parallel universe" from science and philosophy because there's nothing like that in those ideologies. Parallel universe is fiction, it is art and not science nor philosophy. Your brain will never boot beyond its capacity, ever. You should go and play with people with your kind of IQ. Just get the fuck_ out of here, I'm done trying to convince a dumbass
|
OkaiCorne:Lol, see dumbness at its peak. I am still wondering why your IQ is this low. I never disagreed with Stephen Hawking on the only true fact. God does not exist. I also agree with him that we have other universes, but they are not parallel to our universe. Please, I take your spirit creator beg you, let your dumb brain process this one o ![]() And yes, I strongly disagree with him, and that's if he said we have "parallel universe". But again, I am sure Hawking didn't say that. He said something else but your low IQ cannot understand what the renowned scientist said. For crying out loud parallel universe is a fiction. You need to learn, you really need to. The link below said the Parallel universe is a hypothetical idea, an assumption, a possibility and not a fact. Is that too hard to understand? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallel_universe_(fiction) Don't come and be crying here that they are insulting you because you are dumb ![]() |
OkaiCorne:Lol chai chai... ![]() Are you touched by my jabs? Eyah. Sorry my obtuse friend, I can't help it. Why are you translating intelligence for jabs? Are you more stupid than I thought? Hmmm. I have tried in so many ways to pass some intellect to you, but you can't process it. I have realized now that it wasn't your fault. You just cannot go beyond your capacity. Your IQ IS INCREDIBLY LOW Stop throwing weak jabs, it's like hitting me with foam. You cannot come up with intelligent discussion, you cannot even manage smart jabs. It's really a pity. Here are some of Stephen Hawking the great atheist quotes, digest them. “There is a fundamental difference between religion, which is based on authority, and science, which is based on observation and reason. Science will win because it works.” “We are each free to believe what we want, and it’s my view that the simplest explanation is; there is no god. No one created our universe, and no one directs our fate.” |
OkaiCorne:Lol Chai... [b]See someone who doesn't know pinch about energy ranting on what energy can do. You just cannot understand the concept and it has started paining you. Gullibly, you even went and brought links of Stephen Hawking talking about other universes, the Professor does not even give a fuck_ about your eternal creator, how is his work going to prove that there is a God? I have said it that you don't have a working brain. Graycoder was able to testify that you don't have a working brain, he had to leave you to rot in your ignorance. Do you know how long it took that man to explain how sight works to you? You will be countering facts that you know zilch about. You are a lost sheep, I swear. Does it make you cum to say the things you don't know? Stephen Hawking said God does not exist, now as obtuse as you are you want to use his work to prove a spirit exists. Lol, you're a he-goat, sir. How Energy formed the world is something you and your coming generations might not understand, except if you're lucky that you will have someone more intelligent than you in your generations who will discover these things. Else, hmm it's a pity. You don't even know what constitutes consciousness, the link between biological molecules. Just give me one reason I should keep dragging matters with a novice and an ignoramus like you? Please, don't come back. We have had enough of your obliviousness. Good day Mr low IQ.[/b] ![]()
|
OkaiCorne:You keep bringing up matters I'm done with, what the eff is wrong with you? You cannot even tell us the non-existent creator's motives or actions on planes of existence, now you want to talk about his motives on Bermuda triangle. Can you talk about the motives of SOMETHING THAT DOES NOT EXIST? Come off it and tell us the motives for creating Bermuda, to kill the people it has already killed, right? ![]() If I was once a pastor and I asked the non-existent creator and he could say a word because he is not there, do you want me to keep fetching water in a basket? Lol, I am not like who talk to a giant spirit. Your giant spirit cannot even say simple "Hi." Yet he is While I sip my tea, keep ranting bro. I'll keep reading, I'm done addressing your ignorance. Good day sir. |
OkaiCorne:YOU ARE SO QUACK. Reason this out, Let's assume the eternal creator is the most intelligent being, for what purpose then id he create the Bermuda triangle? It bemuses me that a so much intelligent creator couldn't realize the consequences of the Bermuda triangle before creating it. Even after creating it and it started killing its creatures, it still can't change. That's really intelligence at its most ridiculous showing. You can keep dancing with this your imaginary, intuitive and unverifiable creator while I sip my tea. It's none of my business. On the other hand, what makes sense is that the not conscious energy was the one that formed the Bermuda triangle and it doesn't care if it kills people or not. I have told you that a billion times but you will NEVER sink in your head. I am sorry you can't understand it, it's beyond your reasoning. |
OkaiCorne:A double standard is characteristic of a confused person. You are just jumping from right to left without making any point. If you're caught somewhere, you jump to the opposite side. I have stopped worrying since it has become clear that you are insincere and not straightforward. Graycoder also confirmed it so I am not the only person who saw it. I am not going to be dragging forecasting and knowing with you. I have a knack for detecting a fruitless discussion, I have so much on my table to worry about. If me proving theists wrong is what disturbs you, sorry it's paining you. It's not my fault, I just don't like it when people cry and pray to a giant non-existent being. It doesn't make sense for a thinking man to believe in what's not there. Look around you and see how the belief in God has dragged us back, it has really affected humanity negatively. If you theists cannot see it, we can. We all can't be blind. Some people must lead humanity to advancement. Scientists are doing well in that regards. The only ideology that gives humanity hope is Science. I don't want to assume with intuition the ideology you belong to, and my information on you is not complete so logic will fail me too. It's clear you're not a Christian or a Muslim, but since you are still one of those who still believe in a God, that makes you a theist. You may have another religion, but you're a theist. That's the confusion rocking you people, nonalignment when it comes to this imaginary ghost you people serve. You can't reach a conclusion on it. Unlike atheists who have a definite stand that this imaginary ghost is not there. IT IS NOT THERE. |
OkaiCorne:Don't shy away by using your usual tactics of injecting an unrelated topic. I showed you the pictures from Encarta dictionaries. You said forecasting means knowing the future, now do you know better? Or do you want me to upload the definition of an idea too? Having an idea is still the same thing as having a suggestion. I told you that people forecasting the future is different from people knowing the future. But you want to prove my logic to be wrong. I guess you failed already because logic is not used when forecasting as I stated above. I told you people may be right or wrong when forecasting because they use incorrect logic. While we both know that logic insists on correctness. In case you forgot, see it below Akin1212:Since you cannot be sincere at all, please just stop coming here to disturb me. |
OkaiCorne:I will gladly oblige you once more to expose you, bros. You know I like doing this. After seeing the two definitions below, Sir OkaiCorne, tell us. Can you know(certain) if you will live tomorrow or you can forecast(suggest) that you will live? You must answer oo. Chai English is really hard oo Forecast - To suggest what will happen Know - To be certain of what will happen
|
OkaiCorne:You know you cannot go so quit the forming. Tell us if forecasting is the same as knowing the future. A few minutes ago you were talking about knowing the future, now you have jumped to forecasting. Can you define forecasting for us? Whether they forecast through algorithms or zombies, they are still predicting it and not knowing it. |
OkaiCorne:Forecasting the future is different from knowing the future, except if you define forecasting as knowing. I'm sure people will like to learn from you. Please tell us now. What's not in the past, the present and can't be in the future is either dead or non-existent. Simple |
OkaiCorne:Wait it seems you have everything mixed up together. Now I am getting to understand you. So forecasting the future now is now logic to you again? People forecast the future, and they fail or pass. Uncertainty, what does that tell you? Incorrect logic + intuition = always uncertain. Please just tell me, do I need to explain everything to you? This your further maths PHD is seeming like elementary school arithmetics PHD ooo ![]() It seems my formula always come out correct. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (of 53 pages)


