₦airaland Forum

OkaiCorne:
And you are saying Isaac Newton, Albert Einstein, Johannes Kepler who were Scientists that believed in an Eternal Creator were wrong because their logic wasn't scientific, but yours is Scientific? This is really getting interesting

So Scientific Logic = Atheism abi?

Nairaland bows at your wisdom sir

You see why I respond to you harshly atimes? It seems you find it hard to think about what I post or you don't comprehend at all.

So because all those scientists you named are theists, all other scientists were, are or have to be theists? This really marvels me when I tend to read something unreasonable from someone who claims to have logic to know that a God exists. The brain that thinks like this cannot know something complex at all, no wonder you believe in a god.
I will name Scientific atheists who have made notable inputs in science and technology and won Nobel prizes here foryou to see and cross check.

- Albert Einstein was an agnostic but you have been wrongly declaring him a theist. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_and_philosophical_views_of_Albert_Einstein

- Zhores Alferov, an atheist. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zhores_Alferov
- Hannes Alfven, an atheist. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hannes_Alfv%C3%A9n
- Philip W. Anderson an atheist. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_W._Anderson
- Svante Arrhenius an atheist. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Svante_Arrhenius
- Paul Broca. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Broca
- Niels Bohr. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niels_Bohr

There much more and tons of them. I can give you more links. You have just been posting about the common scientific names you have heard around, you don't even know a pinch of science. I told you not say things you don't know. It sells you out cheaply. But you will not learn. DON'T SPEAK ABOUT SCIENCE, YOU DON'T KNOW IT.

There are theists and atheists in science. Many scientists have decided not to test the existence of God with their LOGIC because they "decided" to keep their faith gotten through intuition whether wrong or right. It's a choice and that's how they want it, nobody can force them to change it. But many scientists dissected their faith with LOGIC and they saw that it is bullshit_. What will it take you to understand this?

Albert Einstein's religious views have been widely studied and often misunderstood.[1] Einstein stated that he believed in the pantheistic God of Baruch Spinoza.[2] He did not believe in a personal God who concerns himself with fates and actions of human beings, a view which he described as naïve.[3] He clarified however that, "I am not an atheist",[4] preferring to call himself an agnostic,[5] or a "religious nonbeliever."[3] Einstein also stated he did not believe in life after death, adding "one life is enough for me."[6]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religious_and_philosophical_views_of_Albert_Einstein

Nairaland should be crying for you lack of understanding instead because it's a shame, a real big shame.

OkaiCorne:
It baffles me how you hastily arrive at conclusions with no basis... please explain to me how my Logic is wrong when the issue of LOGIC CAN NEVER BE WRONG was overflogged on this thread. Is this another inconsistency from you?

I thought LOGIC CAN NEVER BE FAULTED (WRONG) Now that you are logically driven, are you acknowledging that LOGIC CAN ALSO BE WRONG? And therefore you might be wrong?

I need to be sure if you and Frank317 are on the same page on LOGIC CAN NEVER BE WRONG

Logic can be wrong if the information is incomplete, just like your logic is wrong. And if it is wrong, it is not logic, it is illogic or illogical.

However my logic is based on science, and I explained to you yesterday why scientific logic cannot be wrong, we simply have the basic scientific laws and rules that describe the universe and every matter. Both seen and unseen by us. They follow the same pattern. Do you want me to quote it?

OkaiCorne:
It baffles me how you hastily arrive at conclusions with no basis... please explain to me how my Logic is wrong when the issue of LOGIC CAN NEVER BE WRONG was overflogged on this thread. Is this another inconsistency from you?

I thought LOGIC CAN NEVER BE FAULTED (WRONG) Now that you are logically driven, are you acknowledging that LOGIC CAN ALSO BE WRONG? And therefore you might be wrong?

I need to be sure if you and Frank317 are on the same page on LOGIC CAN NEVER BE WRONG

Are you insinuating that I said logic can never be wrong or you are accusing me that I said that?

If Frank317 said that, he might have referred to scientific logic. Your logic is wrong because it is not based on science and most importantly it is incomplete (attested to by you) which we use to study our universe and the natural world. If the eternal creator created the universe and he is omniscient, then it should be detected by science in the universe.

However, when logic is wrong, then what you are describing is illogical. Doesn't follow logic. So logic being wrong here simply means illogic or illogical

OkaiCorne:
I prefer to be FAST (Intuition) and RIGHT (Logic); than to be SLOW & RIGHT (Logic Alone - Assuming Logic cannot be faulted like that of atheism).

The right side of your brain (Intuition) needs to blend properly with the left side of your brain (Logic) to arrive at certain decisions accurately and in a lot less time.

Fast and Right (Efficiency) is better than Slow and Right (Effectiveness)

DO YOU NEED MORE EXPLANATIONS?

Everybody prefers to be FAST & RIGHT. But with all due respect you are UNCERTAIN and WRONG. See below for the explanations again.

Yesterday, this is the 5th time I am repeating this. We deduced from the link you dropped here that LOGIC insists on CORRECTNESS. Here is the link again http://artificial-intuition.com/intuition.html

You also said yesterday that YOU don't have complete information about God, which means your information is lacking and incorrect.

Which makes your fallible intuition which is 50/50 uncertain and your logic wrong, from the evidence above.
The right side of your brain gives you a 50/50 idea but the left side of your brain gives you a wrong logic due to lack of complete information about God which you said yourself.
So you are Uncertain(intuition) and not effective(wrong logic).

But on the other hand, atheists are CERTAIN(intuition, the 50% correct part) AND RIGHT(logic), also see below for explanations
Every living being has intuition, and anybody who grew up hearing about God has used intuition one way or the other to keep their faith. I have done it while growing up. It was only intuition. Logic does not work with God, it doesn't at all.

We used logic to confirm which side of the 50/50 wrong/right side is correct. But your own logic has incomplete information and so it cannot do this because you cannot be correct about something beyond your reasoning.

OkaiCorne:
Is Intuition ALWAYS WRONG? (Is the right side of your brain just there for nothing?)

All these back and forth is avoidable if you can give ONE BASIC EXAMPLE OF LIFE EXISTING WITHOUT A CREATOR Please all atheists in the house, help me out on the bolded.

If intuition is uncertainty, then you can employ logic. But when your logic is deficient of complete information it becomes wrong too.

You said yourself that you don't have adequate information about God. These were your words yesterday, I am not forming them.

This means the right side of your brain is useless in this case since the information is incomplete, not an insult.
Which also mean that you have ultimately used a wrong logic due to lack of complete information.

Your equation remains INTUITION + WRONG LOGIC(ZERO) = CLAIMED INSIGHT.


Seriously I am not the one avoiding questions, you are. If you can answer my questions, those ones I asked you since on Sunday. I will answer all your questions from A to Z. Just answer my questions, they don't bite.

Akin1212:
Look at the bolded and colored red words above clearly and confirm this. Yesterday we were able to deduce from the link you provided that LOGIC insists on correctness. And we were also able to gather according to you that you don't have complete information about God, and that it is above your reasoning which means you can't fully understand him.

Now in light of the above points, it means your logic is not based on correctness because you cannot be correct about something you don't have complete info about and something beyond your reasoning.

So, now that you have claimed you used logic to conclude that there is a God, it simply means, your logic which is based on incomplete information is wrong.

So, therefore, your equation INTUITION + lOGIC = INSIGHT becomes INTUITION + ZERO = INSIGHT.

This is basic arithmetic and I sincerely expect you a PHD holder in further mathematics should understand it.

OkaiCorne, I am waiting boss.

OkaiCorne:
I have concluded on the existence of an Eternal Creator with a combination of Intuition and Logic; that is why I will ask you and every other atheist to educate me on;

How it is possible for an artwork (Universe) to exist without a Painter (Eternal Creator)

How it is possible for a Decision Tree (Universe) to stand without a start point (Eternal Creator)

You have replied mostly with insults which is a sign that you are on the defensive

I need answers to these very basic questions I just asked you and every other atheist.

Look at the bolded and colored red words above clearly and confirm this. Yesterday we were able to deduce from the link you provided that LOGIC insists on correctness. And we were also able to gather according to you that you don't have complete information about God, and that it is above your reasoning which means you can't fully understand him.

Now in light of the above points, it means your logic is not based on correctness because you cannot be correct about something you don't have complete info about and something beyond your reasoning.

So, now that you have claimed you used logic to conclude that there is a God, it simply means, your logic which is based on incomplete information is wrong.

So, therefore, your equation INTUITION + lOGIC = INSIGHT becomes INTUITION + ZERO = INSIGHT.

This is basic arithmetic and I sincerely expect you a PHD holder in further mathematics should understand it.

OkaiCorne:
All Scientists that believed in an Eternal Creator were fearful right?

1.) Albert Einstein
2.) Francis Collins
3.) Rene Descartes
4.) Johannes Kepler
5.) Sir Francis Bacon
6.) Isaac Newton

These Scientists who have contributed to the foundations of the Science and Logic you defend are totally wrong and you are right abi?

You sir are very wise... I stated this so you know that Atheism is not supported by Science in its totality... Stop using Science and Logic to cover up your deficient reasoning

Yes, they were fearful and wanted to make heaven(the land of the dead) by all means. None of them was able to logically find God.

Now that we have the attention of theists and atheists alike, can we discuss like men and answer direct questions from each other?

If you agree to this, since the rule of first come first serve still stands forever. Can you answer these 48 hours due questions?

1)Who created the planes of existence and for what purpose?

2)Who disrupted the planes of existence and how was it disrupted?

OkaiCorne:
There are Scientists full of logic who still believe totally in the Existence of an Eternal Creator...

I guess they are also wrong abi?

All your noise on logic and science proves nothing...

There are scientists full of logic and full of fear. You will not absorb this, I'm sure.

But there are also scientists who are full of logical reasoning after intuiting that a god may or may not exist.

Intuition is a two-way junction, you can be correct and you can be wrong with the same precision and percentage. 50/50. That simply means intuition gives you uncertainty. Who would believe there is a God on uncertainty principle? Of course, you will.
Most people subscribe to this but they just call it FAITH. DO YOU KNOW WHAT FAITH IS? Don't worry, I will attach a picture for you.

But when you apply logic, you don't want to rely on faith anymore. You want to use theories and facts to break it down. We all have threaded the intuition path. But atheists are brave enough to use logic to find God. We are not scared of any God or Satan or Hellfire. We want to use our brain to reason it out, You cannot do that because you don't have logic.

The atheists on Nairaland will be very happy with how I am exposing your gullibility. Their only disappointment would be that I have dragged tit far with someone with low IQ to understand what intuition is and what logic is.

Logic is responsible for critical thinking.
Intuition is responsible for the faith that something just exists.

You really need to understand these things. I want you to learn, you just have to.

frank317:
Lol... his intuition can only tell him there is a creator but it cant tell him how thia creator came to be? Nor can it tell him if the creator is the first born or has brothers.

It definitely cannot. That is why we have been dancing around the same ish since. Maybe you should send him some envelope full of logic

Our intuitive friend here posted a link-> http://artificial-intuition.com/intuition.html From where we were able to deduce that intuition is what we need when we don't have to think. We can use intuition when we want to handle everyday problems like reading, driving, and danger.

But our intuitive friend expects us to use intuition to think about God after his link also told us that intuition is fallible. Fellow Nairalanders, is this not foolishness? Foolishness in the high places ever seen.

The most annoying part is when an ignoramus thinks he knows but he does not know. This intuitive friend of ours has been blackfaced umpteen times here on this thread on many grounds. But you know when you're blackfacing someone and he does not want to run, he keeps giving you his face to be punched. He has now punched himself in the face while trying to throw slow punches as usual, only that this time he punched himself hard. He himself typed that when we are in danger and we don't have time to think(use logic) we will need to use intuition. This is what I call self-destruction. But despite that, unfortunately, our friend will not realize he has mutilated himself. He will still defend his retarded_ mind.


Here is the excerpt from the link above
Intuition is what we use to handle everyday problems such as predicting limb positions and controlling muscle movement, to understand and generate speech, to read, to analyze what we see, to drive a car, etc. In short, all the things we do that we take for granted and which we do "without thinking".

OkaiCorne:
Please expose my ignorance by using Science and Logic to prove how these impossible things can be made possible;

1.) Your existence without Parents OR

2.) Your ability to be a man without testicles and testosterone.

My fellow atheists actually want you to answer the questions that you have been avoiding for 48 hours now.

1) Who created the planes of existence and for what purpose?

2) Who disrupted the planes of existence and how?

If you can honour us and answer those, we will provide answers to all the questions your mind can come up with.

It's not our fault, you started the questions avoiding game since sunday.

OkaiCorne:
Yes...

Your existence without Parents is a basic example we can start with...OR your ability to be a man without testicles and testosterone is another option to consider.

Good, since some things are impossible according to you.

That means some things are also impossible for your eternal creator.

And it becomes valid logically if I say it is impossible for your eternal creator to exist...

OkaiCorne:
Yes...

Your existence without Parents is a basic example we can start with...OR your ability to be a man without testicles and testosterone is another option to consider.

What a shame, I have invited Nairalanders to see more of your ignorance.

OkaiCorne:
When you are true insulting me...kindly explain to myself and Nairalanders;

How it is possible for an artwork (Universe) to exist without a Painter (Eternal Creator)

How it is possible for a Decision Tree (Universe) to stand without a start point (Eternal Creator)

I am not intelligent, you are the intelligent person. Please educate myself and other "ignorant and senseless" Nairalanders out there

Maybe you should educate the whole atheists of Nairaland how your eternal creator came to being.

He just appeared, created humans and started tormenting us?

He just appeared from nowhere, right? Come on, give us intuitive justifications. We are very eager to hear from your intuitive knowledgebase.

OkaiCorne:
You asked if there is anything impossible?

Is it possible for you to exist on Earth without your Parents doing the required thing ?

Your speed at running for direct questions is heroic.

Questions don't bite, answer this simple question.

Is anything impossible? Yes or No

OkaiCorne:
Why do you love shooting yourself in the foot?

You earlier said you can rely on intuition whenever you need to...can you rely on something you don't need to think about whenever you want to?

You are really displaying your scientific wisdom ooo

English is very hard for you son.

Please read this and most importantly comprehend it.

According to your link, they said intuition is what we use when we don't need to think. eg Fight or flight situations like danger.

Are you saying you don't agree?

When a lion is chasing you, do you need to rely on running? You just have to run based on intuition.

I know as senseless as you are you would call your eternal creator to come and help you.

OkaiCorne:
But you that is "wise"...

How is it possible for an artwork (Universe) to exist without a Painter (Eternal Creator)?

How is it possible for a Decision Tree (Universe) to stand without a start point (Eternal Creator)?



In other news so you combine INTUITION AND LOGIC all of a sudden now abi? You actually do rely on intuition at times abi?

I think I need to quote some old posts of yours to demonstrate your inconsistencies at a glance

Let me weigh your brain again one more time. It's time to fuck_ up again

Is there anything that is impossible?

Don't let me down again my friend. I know your IQ is quite low but then it can carry this one no matter how low.

PS. I don't combine logic and intuition. I use them differently. I told you but you don't read to comprehend. I will quote the message again below, read it this time around and comprehend it.

Akin1212:
Crying is the last thing you would want to do. Who hurts your ego? Me or Frank317? [b]Just read this epistle attentively.

We all have intuitions, my intuition and Frank's tell us there might be a God, and there might not be a God. So I employed logic(science) to unravel the truth so that I will not on agnosticism. The truth came and it didn't come with a giant spirit. So what do you want me to do? Create one in my mind like you have done? Hell no.

You, on the other hand, you lack logic, your logic is at level zero. So you succumbed to your intuition which may or may not be correct. Which means you are uncertain of what you say. The most annoying part of it is that you ignorantly came out in the open on a forum as big as this to[b] say the things you don't know[/b]. That's really bad of you.

Intuition is basic for every man, I can deduce with intuitions that my girlfriend is cheating me. But I have to apply some logic to be certain.

You used your fingers to type yesterday that you are on a journey and you don't have complete knowledge of your eternal creator, See this logic, one that you lack, can you know if I am at home if you're coming to my house when you're on the road? Of course, No because you don't have complete information about me. That is what logic gives you. Intuitions will deceive you that I am at home because that is what you want to believe.

Another logic here, you would need to call me on phone and I will answer you and tell you I am home or not. Physicality is there for you. But can your eternal creator talk to you and you will hear with your ears? Hell no. That's one of the things he cannot do, why? because he is not there, your call will keep ringing in space for eternity.

Another logic here for you, you really lack these logics, so we have to help you develop them gradually.
If your mighty eternal creator created the world, created us and everything that exists, why is it very hard for him to appear in it? As it stands, no one has ever seen this creator ever.

Oh, of course, we have to die before we can do that, why? Because he lives in the land of the dead, right?

Let me give you one last logic, I hope these logics are developing your brain.

If this your eternal creator is very intelligent, and of course if he created all things that creep the earth, why do we have so much unintelligent creatures, humans and things around us? Does the Bermuda look intelligent to you?

See, I am more mature than throwing jabs around. Let's quit this already, I have given you the chance enough to prove this eternal creator of yours, but you only resorted to throwing tantrums because you cannot go further. You're hooked and I understand it. Farewell.

[/b]

Our intuitive friend here posted a link-> http://artificial-intuition.com/intuition.html From where we were able to deduce that intuition is what we need when we don't have to think. We can use intuition when we want to handle everyday problems like reading, driving, and danger.

But our intuitive friend expects us to use intuition to think about God after his link also told us that intuition is fallible. Fellow Nairalanders, is this not foolishness? Foolishness in the high places ever seen.

The most annoying part is when an ignoramus thinks he knows but he does not know. This intuitive friend of ours has been blackfaced umpteen times here on this thread on many grounds. But you know when you're blackfacing someone and he does not want to run, he keeps giving you his face to be punched. He has now punched himself in the face while trying to throw slow punches as usual, only that this time he punched himself hard. He himself typed that when we are in danger and we don't have time to think(use logic) we will need to use intuition. This is what I call self-destruction. But despite that, unfortunately, our friend will not realize he has mutilated himself. He will still defend his retarded_ mind.


Here is the excerpt from the link above
Intuition is what we use to handle everyday problems such as predicting limb positions and controlling muscle movement, to understand and generate speech, to read, to analyze what we see, to drive a car, etc. In short, all the things we do that we take for granted and which we do "without thinking".

OkaiCorne:
Apparently...Akin1212 is someone who relies on logic (not instinct o), to run when;

1) He sees a Lion approaching him

2) He sees a thief approaching him with a gun.


Apparently your Intuition (Instinct) is so absent you don't even rely on it in any circumstance at all

Do you want me to leave or do you still want to tango? I haven't even started yet o

You have made a record. I believe Seun is proud he allows asinine fellows like you on a public forum as large as this.

1) He sees a Lion approaching him

2) He sees a thief approaching him with a gun.

How are these two numbered points above equivalent to a giant spirit in the clouds exists?
Your brain does not work at all... I am sorry to say.

Yesterday, I still quoted the link you brought here, that intuition is what you use when you don't have to think.

Of course, when you see danger you use intuition because you don't need to think. But your brain cannot process anything. Can it? Instead, you use your own intuition to think. I, on the other hand, use intuition when it is needed and logic when it is needed.

I am really tired of your stupidity... My friend, you are really stupid and I am tired of dancing with a fool who does not process anything with his brain... I am really sorry for those who listen to you. I am glad you are exposing yourself greatly here. This is so ludicrous

OkaiCorne:
Why are you overflogging an issue I allowed you to "win" just to confirm if you had common sense or not?

First you said common sense is infallible...now you have used logic to define common sense that you initially said is infallible. So it is possible for common sense to be logical abi?

Nairaland is in awe of your wisdom

I swear ...it is easy to manipulate you since you are just a logic driven robot

And the link you requoted said we have two types of common sense. A fallible one and an infallible one. Nairaland would have been in awe of your ignorance, but I bet they have better things to be in awe of than this ignorance you have been showing, just quit it and learn

The link also exposed you more, but you misunderstood the English. I had to explain it to you at your level of intelligence, and you couldn't talk about it anymore. Ignorance is actually a disease I have been trying to cure in you, but your resistance to knowledge is unimpressive and large. Help your yourself bro.

OkaiCorne:
So if an artwork (Universe) exists but the Painter (Creator) cannot be seen (because of self-induced blindness), therefore the Painter does not exist

Do you see how faulty atheism looks with what I just typed? You are just a logic driven robot with little or no intuition to rely on...Na you wan tell me whether I dey wrong...

Go and work on the right hemisphere of your brain...it is fallow and dormant

Lol, what would compare a physical analogy to a spirit argument? It is only a fallible intuition I cannot argue nor compete with you on this. You have a lot of decayed intuition upstairs. Kudos bro, the intuitive master with zero logic. Simple logic you cannot have, it's a pity.

OkaiCorne:
But according to your "common sense" that exceeds mine a million times ... it is possible for an artwork (Universe) to exist without a painter (Eternal Creator) abi?

Is your eternal creator a painter? Or your own intuitive common sense placed a painter that would be a physical being as a spirit? OR YOUR ETERNAL CREATOR IS A PHYSICAL BEING? Are you talking about Energy or a giant Spirit living in the clouds?... I can see so much intuitive common sense oozing from your brain tonight.



From the link you requoted, I have defined my kind of common sense based on logic. Yet you can't see it. We need to open your brain and input some real and correct logic again?

I have common sense in abundance and it multiplies your own a million times. But my common sense cannot detect something that is not physical. No common sense can do that. What common sense can do is not beyond detecting physical things and some kinds of illusion.

I guess we both know the one I possess and the one you possess. Keep dreaming about your eternal creator.

OkaiCorne:
You have defined your common sense based on logic ...hence you do not need the intuitive part of your brain...can you please do me a favor by detaching the right side of your brain that warehouses intuition and creativity and dump it in the trashcan?

Did I define my common sense based on logic alone or you requoted the link? By requoting the link you exposed yourself bro that your own common sense is by fallible intuition. Your post actually explained the difference between you and I, and I simply explained it to you because you could not understand it as a result of ignorance and low IQ. Maybe you should read it again below...


From the link you requoted, I have defined my kind of common sense based on logic. Yet you can't see it. We need to open your brain and input some real and correct logic again?

I have common sense in abundance and it multiplies your own a million times. But my common sense cannot detect something that is not physical. No common sense can do that. What common sense can do is not beyond detecting physical things and some kinds of illusion.

I guess we both know the one I possess and the one you possess. Keep dreaming about your eternal creator.

OkaiCorne:
Now that you admit you do not rely on common sense (seated in the right side of your brain), kindly detach that part of your brain and throw it away... Since life does not know what is best for you...but you alone knows what is best with your logic driven brain

Do you realize I no longer need to type epistles to reply you?

If you are acting blind, I know you are not blind. I only know your brain is not capable of absorption of facts, so I will keep pasting the below to help your brain a little, that's what I do. I help people's brain, the unintelligent people only.

From the link you requoted, I have defined my kind of common sense based on logic. Yet you can't see it. We need to open your brain and input some real and correct logic again?

I have common sense in abundance and it multiplies your own a million times. But my common sense cannot detect something that is not physical. No common sense can do that. What common sense can do is not beyond detecting physical things and some kinds of illusion.

I guess we both know the one I possess and the one you possess. Keep dreaming about your eternal creator.

OkaiCorne:
So do you agree you do not have or need to use your own common sense (right side of your brain)?

I only agree, after all said and done, that what you understand as common sense is "no-sense". You don't have a lot of things, bro. Common sense included. At least I was able to show you that through a link.

With so much fuck_ ups on different levels, speaking about planes of existence, parallel universe etc. You still come here to expose more obliviousness. You don't have shame too?

I beg you, let intelligent people come and don't push them away with this much ignorance, please.

Just imagine someone who wants to comment intelligently seeing that you base your thinking on intuition and you're proud of it.

The link you brought up also said, intuition is what you use when you don't want to think. I guess that describes you, or do you think?


Intuition is what you have first, then logic comes after. But you blend your own together. Can you blend zero logic with intuition?

I'm tired of discussing intelligent issues with an unintelligent person, it's too stressful.

After you have been proven to be wrong many times uncountable, you still come to expose more, why are you doing this to yourself?

What I know is that unintelligent people yearn to learn, but you want to become more unintelligent, why?

Raise your intelligence bro, I suggest you reread the thread from number 0 to this point and learn things that you have skipped. Thank you

OkaiCorne:
But why are you asking for an answer that the logical part of your brain cannot process alone?

You don't have common sense to understand my answers...and you have demonstrated that repeatedly over this thread

The best thing your logic driven mind can do is to counter every person that wants to reason with you with one insult or the other.

Go and develop your intuition (right side of your brain) so you can process my answer very well

You now want to reduce your sample size to Christians and Muslims so you can find easy prey to feast on abi?

Okay, common sense is not actually common, I guess everybody reading the thread can see that manifestation here. Nobody can use intuition to find God, that has been established, but if you want to use it, feel free bro. Thank you. Farewell.

OkaiCorne:
Don't run away... I DO NOT KNOW EVERYTHING ABOUT THE ETERNAL CREATOR JUST AS YOU DO NOT KNOW EVERY SINGLE THING ABOUT YOUR PARENTS

Are you expecting me to know everything in one single day?

Or everything you knew about life...you knew it in a single day abi?

Why are you displaying your scientific and logic driven wisdom to the shame of your fellow atheists like this?

Running away? Do you realize I opened this thread? I am here for as long as I am alive.

When you know you did not know everything about your eternal creator, why talk about it at all? Don't you think it wioll be reasonable when you know all about it then you should come back?

Life is physical, I know it, I see, I feel it, I touch things in life, In fact, I sense it. But if you cannot sense God with the five senses he allegedly created, then he is not there.

You have to die and become a spirit before you see him, isn't it true? I am done with these discussions on your eternal creator if coming up with unrelated analogies is what you want to invest in. I showed you definitions of analogy, go back to it. When you have a reasonable and similar analogy, you can bring it.

OkaiCorne:
Don't run away... I DO NOT KNOW EVERYTHING ABOUT THE ETERNAL CREATOR JUST AS YOU DO NOT KNOW EVERY SINGLE THING ABOUT YOUR PARENTS

Are you expecting me to know everything in one single day?

Or everything you knew about life...you knew it in a single day abi?

Why are you displaying your scientific and logic driven wisdom to the shame of your fellow atheists like this?

[b]Are you inciting Nairalanders to your support or what? You have been jumping up and down since we started without making reasonable points.

Yesterday, you were just trashed here. You actually said imagination beats logic and Frank317 trashed you. You said there is the 6th sense in science and I trashed you. You said planes of existence exist, I still trashed that. You said the parallel universe is real, well I raised your awareness on that and educated you that it is a fiction. You brought up links on intuition and logic, I trashed you by quoting the same link where they revealed to you that intuition is fallible and logic insists on correctness, and at that point your nerves were calm. What more do you want? You want all Nairalanders to be as gullible as you are? I am tired of exposing your ignorance, and I am not stopping you from romancing your non- existent eternal creator. Please go on for as long as you can. You don't have to prove any point to me, why HAVE YOU BEEN CUMMING ON THIS THREAD SINCE LAST WEEK?

You now bring the brain and its functions, where I will demolish you finally. This is not stubbornness, it is suicide.
But I will not go down that lane, if you cannot answer why God has spared Satan and killed people who committed fewer crimes or who created the planes of existence, those who exist only in the religious world, you can excuse yourself. I have gone past throwing jabs online, but it was nice hitting your head with some I must confess. Farewell, only respond if you have the answers to what this thread is about. I don't care about your eternal creator's existence. If you are not a Christian or a Muslim, please excuse us.[/b]

OkaiCorne:
Functions: Responsible for control of the left side of the body, and is the more artistic and creative side of the brain
Functions: Responsible for control of the right side of the body, and is the more academic and logical side of the brain
Picture
If you would split the brain right down the middle into two symmetrical, or equal parts, you would have a right and left hemisphere. Although equal in size, these two sides are not the same, and do not carry out the same functions.


The left side of the brain is responsible for controlling the right side of the body. It also performs tasks that have to do with logic, such as in science and mathematics. On the other hand, the right hemisphere coordinates the left side of the body, and performs tasks that have do with creativity and the arts. Both hemispheres are connected by the corpus callosum and serve the body in different ways .

http://brainmadesimple.com/left-and-right-hemispheres.html

Scientific links cannot prove your points. We are not arguing the brain and its functions. That's how you have been diverting and avoiding everything since we started. Science is against the concept of a God. Keep using your intuition. I am letting you go. Go on boy, keep believing in your creator. But please read my above post attentively. Farewell.

OkaiCorne:
As a logical robot that you are, DO YOU HAVE COMMON SENSE AT ALL? Is this question too difficult to answer?

You have Logic seated in your left brain, and intuition/creativity on the right side of your brain. Why not carve out your right brain and throw it into the gutter since you do not need common sense and intuition

Crying is the last thing you would want to do. Who hurts your ego? Me or Frank317? Just read this epistle attentively.

We all have intuitions, my intuition and Frank's tell us there might be a God, and there might not be a God. So I employed logic(science) to unravel the truth so that I will not on agnosticism. The truth came and it didn't come with a giant spirit. So what do you want me to do? Create one in my mind like you have done? Hell no.

You, on the other hand, you lack logic, your logic is at level zero. So you succumbed to your intuition which may or may not be correct. Which means you are uncertain of what you say. The most annoying part of it is that you ignorantly came out in the open on a forum as big as this to[b] say the things you don't know[/b]. That's really bad of you.

Intuition is basic for every man, I can deduce with intuitions that my girlfriend is cheating me. But I have to apply some logic to be certain.

You used your fingers to type yesterday that you are on a journey and you don't have complete knowledge of your eternal creator, See this logic, one that you lack, can you know if I am at home if you're coming to my house when you're on the road? Of course, No because you don't have complete information about me. That is what logic gives you. Intuitions will deceive you that I am at home because that is what you want to believe.

Another logic here, you would need to call me on phone and I will answer you and tell you I am home or not. Physicality is there for you. But can your eternal creator talk to you and you will hear with your ears? Hell no. That's one of the things he cannot do, why? because he is not there, your call will keep ringing in space for eternity.

Another logic here for you, you really lack these logics, so we have to help you develop them gradually.
If your mighty eternal creator created the world, created us and everything that exists, why is it very hard for him to appear in it? As it stands, no one has ever seen this creator ever.

Oh, of course, we have to die before we can do that, why? Because he lives in the land of the dead, right?

Let me give you one last logic, I hope these logics are developing your brain.

If this your eternal creator is very intelligent, and of course if he created all things that creep the earth, why do we have so much unintelligent creatures, humans and things around us? Does the Bermuda look intelligent to you?

See, I am more mature than throwing jabs around. Let's quit this already, I have given you the chance enough to prove this eternal creator of yours, but you only resorted to throwing tantrums because you cannot go further. You're hooked and I understand it. Farewell.

OkaiCorne:
Agnostics are [b]not sure if there is an Eternal Creator. I am sure there is One. How does that make me an Agnostic?[/b] Do you want to induct me in the agnostic society by force?

You have been spitting more of insults RATHER THAN BRINGING BASIC EXAMPLES TO COUNTER ME... While you are at it, please bring one basic example for us to start with...

You weep for Nigerian Youths...instead of saving the tears to weep for your deficient mentality

Try a little bit to mask your frustrations

Today is another day to destroy some of your ignorance. I'm not gonna stop until it is finally done. I have bolded some of your statements and I will destroy them with your claims yesterday.

You told us yesterday that you don't have a complete knowledge of your eternal creator. So how can you be sure he exists? Intuition and common sense again?