Akin1212's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Akin1212's Profile › Akin1212's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (of 53 pages)
tunjijones:Lol, when your family members were not admitted in any teaching hospital, how will you notice? |
mikeapollo:So God's existence is a factor of how deep the pocket is? Olodo. |
This is now closed, closed |
Deleted post, got my answer |
majortwild:Sorry for your loss, Parvo is 100% treatable but it is wise to take all precautions to ensure the puppy does not contract it. |
KushLyon:Lol, making assumptions about you or anyone is not a test of IQ, and you didn't know any of those things I mentioned until I did. You are a web developer and that makes my assumption correct, but here you are pretending to have a higher IQ. I won't even go into that, it is inconsequential, I already concluded on your IQ. Mark did not acquire Facebook, since you are a web developer, please stick with what you know |
. |
ekehopp2:Lol, who avoids binary tree and linked list questions though, those are mostly what you will be asked in coding interviews. |
KushLyon:You're capping, and I don't think you're a developer who makes an app. You are probably one who jailbreaks other people's hard work and leaves them scratching their heads. What do you mean by Mark Zuckerberg being a crybaby who doesn't want anybody to touch his toy, who wants anyone to touch the toys that they spend billions on? To even think you referred to a business as a toy is very telling. Start a business and do nothing when people attack your business. You are not aware of how much WhatsApp was acquired by Facebook. You don't even know that Telegram is open source and reproducible builds are allowed. I doubt you even know the difference between open-source and closed-source. |
Cujo007:This is one year old already but let me weigh in. Viruses weaken the immune system in viral infections and release pathogenic bacteria from immunity prisons. When pathogens are free, they cause the diseases associated with viral infections. In other words, it's not the virus that directly makes us sick, it just weakens our immunity and allows bacteria to run riot. So the treatments are done to fight bacteria and help the immune system to focus on the virus and kill it, and it's also the same in dogs. So, in parvo infections, what we treat are bacteria infections, the dog's system will fight the virus by itself(It is said that if a dog survives 7 days of treatment, the chance of survival is high). That's why it's good to vaccinate puppies so the virus won't be new to the system and the system can perfectly eliminate it. It's also why vaccinated dogs quickly get better when treated for parvo than unvaccinated dogs. I hope you get it now. |
Lovelydaisies:Correct me if I am wrong. Your moral compass is a factor of religion and religious doctrine, and that's why you condemned sexual relationships as immoral, true, or false. |
Lovelydaisies:You capped at the end, nothing concerns sexual relationships with morality, over religiousness won't be the end of you. |
DevNGA:Thanks for stopping by/ Have you used, or are you currently using or do you know anyone using it to receive payment from Google Adsense? |
Please does anyone here knows how to receive Adsense payments for a US account? Payoneer is not working. Treat it as urgent, thanks! |
Rubbiish:s Are you saying there are no women at 55-year-olds who are not suffering and are happy with their lives? Or are you saying there are no women at 55-years-olds with husbands and children who are still suffering? What exactly would a 55-year-old married woman get from her husband and kids that would make her suffer if she wasn't married with kids? |
tiswell:You have seen many things that do not exist, it only proves that you are blind. We are definitely not mates, at least in the department of thinking, you are way below. All you do is project your whims, caprices, and conjectures on strangers online. It must really hurt to be you. If your parents had shown love to you when you were a kid, you would know very well that human beings are supposed to be given the freedom to live their lives on their own terms and not pressured to live the way others want. I am guessing you are one of those kids your parents hit every time you express your desires, hence you grew up with that attitude that everyone must do this or that, instead of doing what they want in line with their desires. You will be fine, or not, it may be too late, I only pity you. |
sammydark:Her life is dependent on getting married? |
tiswell:You cannot help but prove further that you are just a child, a mannerless one at that. Obviously, no content, so you have to reference my parents. What does that have to do with this? Normally, it's a lack of depth that causes things like this and no surprises there, you don't have anything to say or a solid philosophy to back up your thought process. I honestly find it hard to fault you, child. Now, because my parents did what they did, does not stipulate that anyone must do what they did, I am not really surprised you do not realize that, you may not even after reading this. Because the lady in question has parents who got married, does not mean she must follow in their footsteps. We are all individuals first, we have different desires and values, and virtues. And every individual should be allowed to live how they want without pressure. She is 31 years and is able to make her own decisions, by herself! Now, if you do things because your parents did them, more grease. But not everyone will be docile like you are. Everyone is different, if you got married because your parents did, it goes to show how weak a person you are. Many people will get married on their own terms and time, whether their parents did this does not direct what they will or should do. So, all those weak, kindergarten philosophies should only live in your head. You should not be posting stuff like this online, for real. You are here talking about experience and determining age limitations on women, in 2023? Have some shame. There is nothing like a biological clock. A family should not be in the business of their relatives on how they want to live. Obviously, it has skipped you that pressuring people to do what you want against what they actually want can also cascade into a psychological mess. Let people live their lives and deal with the consequences, focus on your own life! Her family should focus on their problems, they can only discuss what she wants with her and not pressure her, it is her life. Learn from this, and stop singing about the experience you don't have. |
tiswell:Lol, the attitude of a kid is calling someone a kid because they disagree with you. It is people like you that want to control people's lives and their happiness that feel shame because they are not married. If you talk about experience, I am sure my log of experience doubles yours, but take the mic, express your mind let's see how shallow it is. |
Nazgul:Threaten suicide? Na wa o Your ICH lecturer has poor philosophy, the majority or 5 people can also be wrong. If 5 people say you are drunk, it doesn't mean something is wrong with you, because they may all be blind. Life is bigger than this. Despite the fact that parents may have a genuine interest and care about their children and want the best for them, pressuring them to get married is wrong! Parents should let their children live their lives how the children want it, not how they want them to live. The aim of living life is not to get married or be in relationships, there is more to life than that. |
YoungLionken:There is nothing good about that advice, lwkmd |
frozen70:What age is set for marriage exactly? |
tiswell:Any family feeling shame because one of them isn't married is a useless family. |
Ideservebetter:1. Do not be pressured into getting married, only you will deal with the consequences, those pressuring you won't! 2. Do not rush marriage, it is not a big deal at all. Follow your will 3. Marriage is not a must, it is just traditional and cultural nonsense that makes people feel so. Lastly, it's your call, but don't let people push you around, it is your life. |
paxonel:Were you there when this intervention took place or are you just contributing assumptions as it suits your whim and bias? |
Peterkeys6:Sorry, Mr Gullible. Because you are gullible enough to have 60 Selman's bullshit on your phone, we should give you standing ovation abi? Or because a silly atheist became as gullible as you, I should use her as a standard and become gullible like her? Maybe you should put some effort and try to show that your God exists instead of telling me stories of atheists who became stupid and how many of Selman's bullshit you have on your phone. |
wamiikechukwu:Emulator not coming up does not mean Flutter didn't install. It's better to use your phone to run the apps. What's the ram of your system? |
wamiikechukwu:If you're on windows, you need to download the flutter sdk first. The use Android studio to locate the sdk. It's very simple. |
The problem of omniscience Omniscience can be loosely defined as having the capacity to know everything. For most theists, God is omniscient, i.e., he knows the past, present and the future. He knows every detail of the Universe, he knows every part of our DNA, in short, he has infinite knowledge of everything that can ever be known to man. Omniscience and freewill If God knows that a man on a red shirt will crash a red car into a red fence in 30 minutes' time, then the outcome of that event is certain, if the outcome is certain, then the person is only following God's will, if the person is following God's will, then the person really has no will of his own. In other words, free will is an illusion. Omniscience and omnipotence Omnipotence means the ability to do anything. A terrorist detonates a bomb and kills 7 people, the police couldn't have stopped it because they had no knowledge of the event. If God had intervened to stop this terrorist, then he is truly not omniscient, he couldn't have changed an outcome that was already certain, if he did that, then the outcome wasn't really certain. Let me create another scenario, if a glass plate rolls off a table, either the glass plate will break or it won't break. If you stop it from hitting the floor, then there is nowhere you could have known whether the plate would have broken or not. For a god who knows the outcome, how can he stop it? If he stops it, he didn't really know the outcome. Omniscience and God's word The designer of a machine has a proper knowledge of how the machine works and understands its intricacies. The creator of the Universe should inspire a book that contains no ambiguities but with insights into our universe. When the Bible was written, Australia and America were not discovered, and people thought the earth was flat, how exactly has this so-called God's word guided us to understand the nature of the universe? How exactly has it led to scientific breakthroughs? There are so many portions of the Bible that cannot be practised or recreated in modern times. The Bible fails logically and scientifically as God's word. The Bible is not the work of an omniscient God. Looking at omniscience itself So theists believe that God knows everything, including his own future actions, he sees the past from the present and the present from the past. If God knows everything including his own future, then he doesn't have free will. A God who doesn't have free will couldn't have created the universe, because he needed to have thought about the universe before making it to come into existence. A god who doesn't have free will is not capable of making any decisions on his own. A god who doesn't have free will needs to follow the will of a higher god and so on and that would lead to infinite regress. If God is not omniscient, what makes him different from man? An omniscient god cannot and does not exist. A god who is omniscient is a product of man's invention. From Bela Ekpoh on Facebook |
franchacks:Remote or otherwise and can others also send you an email? |
No book was sent by anybody, nobody is there to send any book. All four books are books of lies written and put together by men to control people. |
GoodMuyis:Lol, why do you all follow the same path? Perhaps, because you are all sheeple? What is the creation of heaven and earth? Do you even have an objective evidence that heaven exists or that earth was created? How can creation which you cannot even show evidence that it happened be the evidence of your imaginary friend? Before we can agree that there was creation, you have to show the evidence of the creator. Else, it's not creation. I want to believe that you think deeply too. If true, then answer this. Which comes first, the creator or the creation? If you use your head well, your answer should be the creator. If the creator comes first, then we must know or see the creator before we can call the observed objects creation. In the absence of a creator, we cannot call observed objects creations. Do you get that? If Isaac Newton was more of a theologian than a scientist, why bring him into this matter? I am more interested in science than theology. |
the picture below is called Plus, it's the unofficial version of telegram that is available on playstore. The main reason why unofficial WhatsApp isn't on playstore is because Mark Zuckerberg is a crybaby that doesn't want anybody to touch his toy. Now you say app stores heavily enforce laws, why haven't they done anything to this unofficial telegram which is a whole lot different from the official telegram (it's just like unofficial WhatsApp!)