majortwild:


I recently lost a pup (GSD) to parvo unfortunately the vet handling it at that time wasn't serious enough with the treatment. It really pained me cuz my last pup got the virus and recovered only for the vet to be nonchalant about this one and it just died like that, i wish i came across this post would have taken it upon myself

Sorry for your loss, Parvo is 100% treatable but it is wise to take all precautions to ensure the puppy does not contract it.

KushLyon:


I know that telegram is open source and plus was built with its API. You're here defending Mark as he if didn't reverse engineer Twitter and built his own version that failed woefully. And yes, I'm aware of how much Mark acquired Facebook, I know the difference between open-source and closed-source, and yes I'm not a developer who makes mobile apps, I'm a web dev. Your post is just full of assumptions against someone you know nothing about, typical of people with 2-digit IQ

Lol, making assumptions about you or anyone is not a test of IQ, and you didn't know any of those things I mentioned until I did. You are a web developer and that makes my assumption correct, but here you are pretending to have a higher IQ. I won't even go into that, it is inconsequential, I already concluded on your IQ. Mark did not acquire Facebook, since you are a web developer, please stick with what you know

.

ekehopp2:

Wow, I solve 1 Leetcode problem per day for over 4 months now, and I particularly avoid Binary Tree and Linked list questions.
I gats change strategy be that.
Looking to try out Turing in the future.

Lol, who avoids binary tree and linked list questions though, those are mostly what you will be asked in coding interviews.

KushLyon:


Just what I was expecting the picture below is called Plus, it's the unofficial version of telegram that is available on playstore. The main reason why unofficial WhatsApp isn't on playstore is because Mark Zuckerberg is a crybaby that doesn't want anybody to touch his toy. Now you say app stores heavily enforce laws, why haven't they done anything to this unofficial telegram which is a whole lot different from the official telegram (it's just like unofficial WhatsApp!)

You're capping, and I don't think you're a developer who makes an app. You are probably one who jailbreaks other people's hard work and leaves them scratching their heads. What do you mean by Mark Zuckerberg being a crybaby who doesn't want anybody to touch his toy, who wants anyone to touch the toys that they spend billions on? To even think you referred to a business as a toy is very telling. Start a business and do nothing when people attack your business. You are not aware of how much WhatsApp was acquired by Facebook. You don't even know that Telegram is open source and reproducible builds are allowed. I doubt you even know the difference between open-source and closed-source.

Cujo007:
That's what I said. They are active against BACTERIA and not Viruses! Bacteria and virus are two different things. So, why do you want to use antibacterial medications in the presence of a Virus?

This is one year old already but let me weigh in. Viruses weaken the immune system in viral infections and release pathogenic bacteria from immunity prisons. When pathogens are free, they cause the diseases associated with viral infections. In other words, it's not the virus that directly makes us sick, it just weakens our immunity and allows bacteria to run riot. So the treatments are done to fight bacteria and help the immune system to focus on the virus and kill it, and it's also the same in dogs. So, in parvo infections, what we treat are bacteria infections, the dog's system will fight the virus by itself(It is said that if a dog survives 7 days of treatment, the chance of survival is high). That's why it's good to vaccinate puppies so the virus won't be new to the system and the system can perfectly eliminate it. It's also why vaccinated dogs quickly get better when treated for parvo than unvaccinated dogs. I hope you get it now.

Lovelydaisies:


You are right. Nothing concerns sexual relationships with morality because they are extremes; one can't be a Christian and combine the two. You can't have sexual relationships outside marriage and call yourself moral. You have to stop fornication and return to God. Then you can embrace morality again.

I'm not over-religious as you put it. Or is it because I said I didn't give him or anyone else you call me over-religious?

Correct me if I am wrong. Your moral compass is a factor of religion and religious doctrine, and that's why you condemned sexual relationships as immoral, true, or false.

Lovelydaisies:
That was how mine pressured me and I was barely twenty-one. It started from then on until I became 'depressed', nervous and worried. I was never truly happy. I left home but I wasn't free.

One man was even telling me to 'loosen' up, that I was too religious and people were finding it hard to approach me. So I should be smiling at anybody I see or open my doors to any Tom and Jerry? Mtchew I knew what he wanted anyway and I never gave him or anyone else.

Anyway, you will be fine. Move out of the house, get yourself stable and be open. Don't compromise unnecessarily. And above all, pray for God's guidance. You will need it. Don't go into sexual relationships because they are not moral. You will be fine.

You capped at the end, nothing concerns sexual relationships with morality, over religiousness won't be the end of you.

DevNGA:

Grey.co should work

Thanks for stopping by/

Have you used, or are you currently using or do you know anyone using it to receive payment from Google Adsense?

Please does anyone here knows how to receive Adsense payments for a US account? Payoneer is not working.

Treat it as urgent, thanks!

Rubbiish:

Oga that man is saying the truth.
If as a lady she is not a clergy, like a rev. Sister, she will suffer at old age o. If ur mom is above 55, Picture your mom as a single lady in this stage of her life, no husband nor kids, u think it will be easy for her to cope? Raising a family is extremely important. Anyone telling u otherwise doesn't care about u.

s
Are you saying there are no women at 55-year-olds who are not suffering and are happy with their lives?
Or are you saying there are no women at 55-years-olds with husbands and children who are still suffering?

What exactly would a 55-year-old married woman get from her husband and kids that would make her suffer if she wasn't married with kids?

tiswell:
from my revelation, I can see a product of single(mother) parenting.

Your parent(s) obviously didn't show you enough love as a kid.

We are not mates!

You have seen many things that do not exist, it only proves that you are blind.

We are definitely not mates, at least in the department of thinking, you are way below. All you do is project your whims, caprices, and conjectures on strangers online. It must really hurt to be you.

If your parents had shown love to you when you were a kid, you would know very well that human beings are supposed to be given the freedom to live their lives on their own terms and not pressured to live the way others want. I am guessing you are one of those kids your parents hit every time you express your desires, hence you grew up with that attitude that everyone must do this or that, instead of doing what they want in line with their desires.

You will be fine, or not, it may be too late, I only pity you.

sammydark:
At 31 you should really be concerned about your life dear.
Forget all these rubbish wokeness on this forum.
Most people advicing you to remain single are only doing so because you re not their business.
Your window of opportunity is getting narrower with each passing year and the truth is you will be miserable and full of regret at old age.

Her life is dependent on getting married?

tiswell:
I'm sure ya momma won't have accepted ya dada had she been 'selective"

I repeat, 'you are still a kid son,experience will teach you"

Women has flower moments in their lives,19-24yrs.
And their desperation clocks begins from 30-34yrs.
Anything beyond that is very anti-biological and definitely must have reverse biological and psychological effect on the lady involved.

...and by extension, her family!

You cannot help but prove further that you are just a child, a mannerless one at that. Obviously, no content, so you have to reference my parents. What does that have to do with this?

Normally, it's a lack of depth that causes things like this and no surprises there, you don't have anything to say or a solid philosophy to back up your thought process. I honestly find it hard to fault you, child.

Now, because my parents did what they did, does not stipulate that anyone must do what they did, I am not really surprised you do not realize that, you may not even after reading this. Because the lady in question has parents who got married, does not mean she must follow in their footsteps. We are all individuals first, we have different desires and values, and virtues. And every individual should be allowed to live how they want without pressure. She is 31 years and is able to make her own decisions, by herself!

Now, if you do things because your parents did them, more grease. But not everyone will be docile like you are. Everyone is different, if you got married because your parents did, it goes to show how weak a person you are. Many people will get married on their own terms and time, whether their parents did this does not direct what they will or should do.

So, all those weak, kindergarten philosophies should only live in your head. You should not be posting stuff like this online, for real.

You are here talking about experience and determining age limitations on women, in 2023? Have some shame. There is nothing like a biological clock. A family should not be in the business of their relatives on how they want to live. Obviously, it has skipped you that pressuring people to do what you want against what they actually want can also cascade into a psychological mess. Let people live their lives and deal with the consequences, focus on your own life! Her family should focus on their problems, they can only discuss what she wants with her and not pressure her, it is her life. Learn from this, and stop singing about the experience you don't have.

tiswell:
You are still a kid.


Experience will teach you,son!

Lol, the attitude of a kid is calling someone a kid because they disagree with you.

It is people like you that want to control people's lives and their happiness that feel shame because they are not married.

If you talk about experience, I am sure my log of experience doubles yours, but take the mic, express your mind let's see how shallow it is.

Nazgul:
This is a very common practice in most Nigerian homes. Some parents (most especially mother's) get worried once their daughter starts clocking 25 and above and isn't showing any sign of settling down anytime soon.

In as much as their nagging might be annoying and embarrassing, you must understand that it's bore out of geninue care about your well-being.

For starters, I'll recommend you sit your dad and mom down and have a heart-to-heart conversation with them. Tell them what their constant nagging is doing to your mental health and threaten to commit suicide if they don't let you be.

You should work on yourself as well. During my university days my ICH lecturer would say "if 5 people tells you that you're drunk, even if you've never tasted alcohol before, check yourself something is wrong with you"

If you've had above 3 serious relationships in the past, and none worked out, I'll recommend you take a break a reflect inwardly, ask yourself certain questions like where am I getting it wrong, should I be more patient, do I overreact to irrelevant issues, am I trustworthy, am I honest, do I talk too much...etc.

If you can truthfully do an honest assessment on yourself this way, and change or adjust where necessary, I believe that your next relationship would be great.

Threaten suicide? Na wa o

Your ICH lecturer has poor philosophy, the majority or 5 people can also be wrong. If 5 people say you are drunk, it doesn't mean something is wrong with you, because they may all be blind. Life is bigger than this.

Despite the fact that parents may have a genuine interest and care about their children and want the best for them, pressuring them to get married is wrong! Parents should let their children live their lives how the children want it, not how they want them to live.

The aim of living life is not to get married or be in relationships, there is more to life than that.

YoungLionken:


You gave the best (advice) so far, I'm impressed..

The OP is funny

There is nothing good about that advice, lwkmd

frozen70:


The issue here is, what age are you

Are you set for marriage

Do you have anything doing that generates income for you

Seat your parents down and discuss with them about this issue and how you want them to give you time to sort yourself

What age is set for marriage exactly?

tiswell:
Better marry and wipe away the shame from ya family.
Na ya family dey feel the shame nor be you
besides you may have become an evening newspaper and still selecting upandan when you aren't a virgin.
Only young virgins has the privilege and pride to 'select" men when it comes to marriage.
So marry that widower,hustler or farmer seeking ya hand in marriage now when you still can.

Any family feeling shame because one of them isn't married is a useless family.

Ideservebetter:
I understand that most parents want the best for their children but at the same time, they should understand certain things that are beyond one's control.

My parents, relatives even family friends won't stop troubling me about marriage. I can't have healthy conversations with my people without them bringing up the marriage topic and worse off in a controversial manner. They always accuse me of being too selective and other talks like that, making me feel awful.

I desire to get married someday even though I don't see it as a "do or die" thing. I've been in relationships that didn't work out and I'm being blamed for it or asked why I didn't just manage. My God!

I've been thinking of how to get away from all these talk, maybe leaving home or changing my line. I really don't know what to do.
I'm someone people know as happy and bubbly outside but when I'm with my people, it's the complete opposite, minimal joy because they won't stop stressing me. For now, I've stopped attending family events since they'll be gathered there and I don't want anyone messing with my mental health.

I'm fed up, I need advice from matured minds please.

1. Do not be pressured into getting married, only you will deal with the consequences, those pressuring you won't!
2. Do not rush marriage, it is not a big deal at all. Follow your will
3. Marriage is not a must, it is just traditional and cultural nonsense that makes people feel so.

Lastly, it's your call, but don't let people push you around, it is your life.

paxonel:
Certainly, evolution will not possibly occur by chance. There was an intervention of an intelligent spiritual God somewhere along the line which is the origin of sexual reproduction.

Were you there when this intervention took place or are you just contributing assumptions as it suits your whim and bias?

Peterkeys6:

Wehdone oga atheist. Go and read about the atheist woman in China that saw the light and have been apologising for misleading people all her life.
"And on the last days, many will ask; Where is the end since the days of our forefathers and that is the sign of the end time". Let it not be in your grave you'll cry out for repentance.
Joshua Selman, I've never met him in person before but his messages are up to 60 on my phone.

Sorry, Mr Gullible. Because you are gullible enough to have 60 Selman's bullshit on your phone, we should give you standing ovation abi? Or because a silly atheist became as gullible as you, I should use her as a standard and become gullible like her? Maybe you should put some effort and try to show that your God exists instead of telling me stories of atheists who became stupid and how many of Selman's bullshit you have on your phone.

wamiikechukwu:


did all those but didn't work... the emulator wasn't coming up

Emulator not coming up does not mean Flutter didn't install. It's better to use your phone to run the apps. What's the ram of your system?

wamiikechukwu:
how were you able to install flutter to your android studio... I tried but it wasn't working so I gave up.

If you're on windows, you need to download the flutter sdk first. The use Android studio to locate the sdk. It's very simple.

The problem of omniscience
Omniscience can be loosely defined as having the capacity to know everything. For most theists, God is omniscient, i.e., he knows the past, present and the future. He knows every detail of the Universe, he knows every part of our DNA, in short, he has infinite knowledge of everything that can ever be known to man.
Omniscience and freewill
If God knows that a man on a red shirt will crash a red car into a red fence in 30 minutes' time, then the outcome of that event is certain, if the outcome is certain, then the person is only following God's will, if the person is following God's will, then the person really has no will of his own. In other words, free will is an illusion.
Omniscience and omnipotence
Omnipotence means the ability to do anything. A terrorist detonates a bomb and kills 7 people, the police couldn't have stopped it because they had no knowledge of the event. If God had intervened to stop this terrorist, then he is truly not omniscient, he couldn't have changed an outcome that was already certain, if he did that, then the outcome wasn't really certain. Let me create another scenario, if a glass plate rolls off a table, either the glass plate will break or it won't break. If you stop it from hitting the floor, then there is nowhere you could have known whether the plate would have broken or not. For a god who knows the outcome, how can he stop it? If he stops it, he didn't really know the outcome.
Omniscience and God's word
The designer of a machine has a proper knowledge of how the machine works and understands its intricacies. The creator of the Universe should inspire a book that contains no ambiguities but with insights into our universe. When the Bible was written, Australia and America were not discovered, and people thought the earth was flat, how exactly has this so-called God's word guided us to understand the nature of the universe? How exactly has it led to scientific breakthroughs? There are so many portions of the Bible that cannot be practised or recreated in modern times. The Bible fails logically and scientifically as God's word. The Bible is not the work of an omniscient God.
Looking at omniscience itself
So theists believe that God knows everything, including his own future actions, he sees the past from the present and the present from the past. If God knows everything including his own future, then he doesn't have free will. A God who doesn't have free will couldn't have created the universe, because he needed to have thought about the universe before making it to come into existence. A god who doesn't have free will is not capable of making any decisions on his own. A god who doesn't have free will needs to follow the will of a higher god and so on and that would lead to infinite regress. If God is not omniscient, what makes him different from man? An omniscient god cannot and does not exist. A god who is omniscient is a product of man's invention.

From Bela Ekpoh on Facebook

franchacks:
are you a programmer are you good with backend if so send me an email at francis@rentease.ca

Remote or otherwise and can others also send you an email?

No book was sent by anybody, nobody is there to send any book. All four books are books of lies written and put together by men to control people.

GoodMuyis:


What proof are you still waiting for? How many time will one have to re-iterate that the creation of the heaven and the Earth is L1 proof that God exists. Other Level of proof have been debated upon so it will be unwise to start afresh.

You shift the goal post from DOES NOT cum CANNOT. Well made you think or assume so is the question

Sometimes, argument is not meant to be won but to pass your information, but is seems like a mockery if your aim of creating discussion is not tangible

Edit: I see that you Accord yourself a glory of deep thinking, FYI there are millions of folks who think and reason more than you do and are theist. Isaac Newton is more a Theologian than a Scientist. And I can tell you that deep thinking ma me realize how easy it was for God to say $earth = new planet(); and the Earth was created, am sure you understand that.

Lol, why do you all follow the same path? Perhaps, because you are all sheeple?

What is the creation of heaven and earth? Do you even have an objective evidence that heaven exists or that earth was created? How can creation which you cannot even show evidence that it happened be the evidence of your imaginary friend?

Before we can agree that there was creation, you have to show the evidence of the creator. Else, it's not creation.

I want to believe that you think deeply too. If true, then answer this. Which comes first, the creator or the creation? If you use your head well, your answer should be the creator. If the creator comes first, then we must know or see the creator before we can call the observed objects creation. In the absence of a creator, we cannot call observed objects creations. Do you get that?

If Isaac Newton was more of a theologian than a scientist, why bring him into this matter? I am more interested in science than theology.

theoriginalgood:
Is it secretly a joke when someone asks whether there’s God? For a random example, which human eyes even know what planet pluto looks like? Is humanity the force behind creation? You know that the wages of sin is death and ALL humans die someday. Evidence that humans are evil sinners. Only God is good, that’s why there’s all this confusion.

https://www.nairaland.com/5057182/reasonable-evidence-gods-existence

Principle of presupposition, what is creation? Calling everything creation is the beginning of your baloneys. What makes everything that exist creations?

TV01:
No I did not. I merely quoted what the Bible - which you continually disparage - says about you.


This is both tired and lame. Your OP was clear - if somewhat clumsily written

It is absolutely the point. The scriptures where written thousands of years ago by a sophisticated and highly intelligent people, who were also deeply spiritual and walked with God. You erected a strawman claiming such adherents were illiterate cavemen. I hope you are suitably humbled - which is the whole point - by the fact that you are yourself at the end of a long line of still semi-literate cavemen.

This I did in my OP. Which was clear to any whose eyes are not blinded by pride, prejudice and a vaulting opinion of his own knowledge & prowess

As above.

As above

As I noted, this is besides the point. Humans are able to conceptualise or interprete concepts and, are able to discover concepts independent of them having previously existed or not.


Yours is a crying shame.


Have a reflective weekend
TV

^{Romans 1:20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:}

Lol, go and sleep sheeple, since you don't have any objective evidence for that which you claim.

GoodMuyis:


What proof are you still waiting for? How many time will one have to re-iterate that the creation of the heaven and the Earth is L1 proof that God exists. Other Level of proof have been debated upon so it will be unwise to start afresh.

You shift the goal post from DOES NOT cum CANNOT. Well made you think or assume so is the question

Sometimes, argument is not meant to be won but to pass your information, but is seems like a mockery if your aim of creating discussion is not tangible

Edit: I see that you Accord yourself a glory of deep thinking, FYI there are millions of folks who think and reason more than you do and are theist. Isaac Newton is more a Theologian than a Scientist. And I can tell you that deep thinking ma me realize how easy it was for God to say $earth = new planet(); and the Earth was created, am sure you understand that.

Lwkmd, what exactly do you mean by the creation of heaven and the earth? Wo told you it was created? How did you get to that conclusion?

But to give you a second chance, are you saying the earth is a proof for superman's existence? What is heaven, any proof of that?

Can't you see that you are just raising dust instead of providing evidence? You are just filling gaps bro, you're not providing evidence.

As far as I am concerned, I created the heavens and the earth, and that should be enough evidence that I did. Don't tell me you don't believe it.

TV01:

How is it ad-hominem? You described people who believe in God as cavemen and illiterates. I asked if your own people - whoever they are - have a written script of their own, and when storey building commenced amongst them. To highlight that 1. Through time, people who believed God have been anything but illiterate and cavemen and 2. that you are in no way positioned to refer to them in a derogatory sense. Unless of course you can show me the script your people invented ? It's not laugh that should be killing you, it's shame .

And to think you just called someone a fool, while the glass of irony shatters on your empty skull

Again let me remind you that holding an idea is different from writing down an idea. I won't have to keep repeating it to a supposed wise one like you, would I? Lol.

Whether my people or family have written anything is out of the argument, it's not even what we are talking about. Stay on point and stop threading the path of mentioning my family or my people. I know you might be tempted judging by your level of IQ to hug ad hominem and straw man, but stay focused. We are interested in those who started the concept of God , they were cavemen.

TV01:


And God has presented clear evidence to His existence - as I clearly noted in my initial offer of assistance . That you reject it on the basis of your own "intellectual prowess" and desire to believe "alternatives" is your choice. No problem for God and no problem for me .

What is the evidence that God has presented? List them please

TV01:


No one asked you to believe without evidence. I pointed some out to you and invited you to investigate.

You have not pointed any evidence.
Enumerate or list them and also show how they are evidence for God?

TV01:


That we know little does not mean that we don't know enough to arrive at the right conclusion from the evidence presented. And consequently take the next logical step.

What little do we know that is just enough?

TV01:


Even if so?

It means it's all human concepts.

TV01:


Old enough to have camped at your current position for years. To have demonstrated umpteen times more hubris, and mercifully, been shown the error of my ways.

It's good you are here. If you truly knew there was no God, you wouldn't waste your limited time arguing about him. CogDiss or what .

Lol, your ignorance is fun to behold.

You're just as old to still hung up to childhood stories. That's a real shame.

[s]The choice his yours. I pray mercy speeds it on and leads you aright.


^{Romans 1:20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse:}[/s]
[/quote]