₦airaland Forum

Jorussia:
It's not possible to do so and I like that way.

They almost succeeded

ogbonti:
IF you read the Judgement, you will know Ighodalo stands a big chance to win

The Tribunal Judgement is against OKPEBHOLO---

How? Let me clear you

IF OKPEBHOLO losses at the Tribunal - he may just give up and wont spend money anymore and go away

No NO NO - THEY WANT HIM TO PAY THE APPEAL COURT JUDGES billions too before Supreme Court slams his head

Do you know the TRIBUNAL just said the document submitted was not enough except witnesses were called ? THE LAW STATES THE

IF YOU HAVE CTC OF THE POLLING UNITS, YOU DO NOT NEED TO CALL WITNESSES --- The Tribunal Judgement will be overturned!!!



It is like your employer telling you- IF YOU SUBMIT YOUR ORIGINAL UNIVERSITY DEGREE- IT IS NOT SUFFICIENT - you have to go call your HOD

and DEAN of FAULTY and VC to prove you are a graduate - who does that ?


IF Supreme Court upholds this judgement - then every certified govt document presented in law courts henceforth will no longer be tenable -

you will have to go call whoever issued it as a witness - HOW IS THAT SUSTAINABLE ?

This law was actually set by the supreme court in delta Guber judgment so rest

Fiscus105:
How are they going to mobilise 200k voters for validation? Effort in futility. Dead on arrival.

Same way bello mobilized 300k Ebira votes in last two guber polls

Olu1000:
Why weren’t the results announced at local government level as is the norm before final announcement at State level? Why were the results all taken to INEC headquarters by passing local government collation? Why were only APC agents & party members allowed into InEC headquarters and the former governor & PDP agents refused entry ? There was collaboration between APC and INEC to rig the election !

Only three LGA results where initially taken to inec headquarters but after pressure, two where returned to LG collation while one wasn't. If you add the figures pdp claimed there, they still lost

Olu1000:
Let’s see if your narrative will hold at the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court.

Oga, these rules of dumping etc where all set by appeal and supreme court

ogaemma:
Stop wasting money 💸 on lawyers and court cases.
Even the Supreme court will uphold his victory.
The Nigeria judiciary is a Department in the APC.
How do you expect them to remove a Governor who ran to Kano Emirates to bow before them, cry before them and quickly promise to compensate families of bandit's that were killed in his state.
How many Northener Governor's have rushed to Edo State in the past to compensate for the Fulani killings of the people of Uromi, Irua Auchi, Ekpoma and Agenebode?
That is the kind of mumu governor APC love.

Which case did pdp prove to be factual? Are the judges Fulani

Olu1000:
Why didn’t you comment on the fact that the result sheets loaded to Irev for the disputed polling units were different from the CTC form submitted by INEC to the petitioners?

Irev is not important. Compare CTC to your agents' copy.

Daddyk87:
and PDP a ruling party didn't have money to spend?

APC outspent them

Olu1000:
You don’t necessarily need to call polling unit agents to prove over voting! Evidence from IREV and EC-8A used at polling unit level were tendered before the tribunal.The results sheet from polling unit level and the sheets uploaded on Irev were different in those disputed polling units.The tribunal look for the only excuse they could find to pervert justice.Anyway the case will be appealed and the Supreme Court will have final say.How can the tribunal say the BVAS were dumped on them? Was it not the same BVAS that was used during the election? It’s clear the tribunal was compromised! Shame on the judiciary!!!

Oga, you don't know what you are saying. You PDP keep doing the wrong thing expecting different results. What the tribunal decided is based on supreme court rulings. You must call witnesses to speak to documents or evidence tendered in court. It is a settled law that you cannot interpret documents you didn't make. To prove overvoting, you need Bvas itself plus inec register and only inec are the ones that can be called which you failed to.
The supreme court has rubbished irev results and you are still depending on irev instead of your own agents copies? Can you see the nonsense.
You cannot bring a machine like bvas and dump it at the court without operating it and showing it to the tribunal how it affected the results. So you where expecting the judges to operate bvas and start searching for evidences for you? Better go and rest

Badexx:
After all the evidences, Omo fear Nigerian judiciary

Which evidences? Those where watery evidences

decasey:
am telling you my brother, I new that something was fishing for him to start singing that Edo is now Lagos and that tinubu must win Edo.

Nothing was fishy. He had no case

ogbonti:
Are you one of the Tribunal Judges?

Take corrections

Sundaymessi:
..... that the judgement was already online even before it was delivered!

Totally different

ogbonti:
Thank you for this advise, sore losers should accept sefeat and stop wasting everyone’s time

The CTC presented by ASUE IGHODALO which was given to him by INEC shows Ighodalo won!

So why should he call witnesses ? when the law states that where the CTC is available, there is no need for witnesses


When the people resort to self help and elexrion day becomes a civil was were INEC officials are burnt alive, pleaae dont statt ranting online that “jungle justice” is not cool


This behavior of yours is what made Uromi tragedy to happen, when the people feel it is a waste of everyone’s time to seek justice from the legal system!

Oga, the SC recently ruled that you must always call witness. No CTC showed Asue winning

blackboy:
This is nonsense . Judiciary has remained sold out to the highest bidder. With all the evidence. The governor said he will give PBAT Edo 2027 that was when I knew the outcome.

Pdp had no evidence

ElevationD:
Akpakomiza how far?
Congratulations to you, but see you again at the appeal court.

Guy, accept your defeat and be humble and learn from me. Life is simple

Ebinpawo1:
No hope with Nigerian judiciary. People that have the mind to look at us at the face and tell us that FCT is now a state, only to enable them achieve their aim.

Oga, that judgment is correct. So you expect fct to get more importance electorally than other states?

AkumTemi:
I am not surprised, our judiciary is a write off.

So they should have given pdp victory?

Evergreen4:
Not surprise, we already know the outcome of the judgement before now, Even if PDP heads to a higher court, they will still loose .

Pdp had no case

fergie001:
With what Justice Kpochi is reading, Congratulations to Monday Okpebholo.

The Bvas machines were tendered through the bar and not through anybody and were just sitting dormant as no evidence was led as to its content.
We do not accept the Petitioners' attempt to confuse us that the Bvas screenshot is not the same as the Bvas extract

fergie001:
Under cross-examination, some of the PWs admitted serial numbers on the ballot papers, hence there presents an evidence of prior recordings.

Another error I spotted. You cannot bring witnesses who will collapse under cross examination and contradict their written statements or witnesses who brought anticipatory evidence

fergie001:
Documents tendered from the bar were dumped on the Court. There were no competent witnesses to defend same, the Court is not a Father Christmas to open it for them.

The witnesses were expected to speak to those documents and even some Prosecution witnesses who did for some of the documents were not competent witnesses as they were neither PU agents nor witnesses who witnessed the non-recording of results live.

Exactly what I have been saying from the beginning of the case.. both of us are legends of electoral cases

Bergavis:
You will soon change you name to Asue🤣🤣🤣

My dear, even if Asue wins in the tribunal, okpebholo will eventually win at the higher courts

fergie001:
The tribunal has adopted bvas, CTC, IREV and all documents submitted by the petitioners.

The tribunal also hold that proof of over-voting was established, non-serialisation by the 1st respondent, INEC, was also established.

The tribunal also held that there was error in figures as some results were not entered for the petitioners.

What the tribunal will seek to determine is the computation of the figures, whether in view of these discrepancies, the actual figures is enough to beat the 2nd respondent or not.

I love this detailing although irev shouldn't have been admitted as it is inconsequential. The bvas was dumped and wasn't demonstrated

Bergavis:
I dey court ooo.

Dismissal up next

fergie001:
PDP v Okpebholo
Akpakomiza2,
press9jatv

Over voting established.....
Non-recording of results established.
Non-recording of serial numbers established


It is heading to computation....

Established in where and where

ElevationD:
Akpakomiza are you in court?

If this ends 2 - 1, in favor of Okpebolo, do you not see danger ahead for him at the appeal court and Supreme Court? I am talking with respect to the leaked court papers.

What do you think?

No danger. Appeal and supreme are more strict

fergie001:
That will be the last.

The tribunal has 3 petitions in total, they are presently reading the preliminary objections in the Accord Party suit.

I understand AI sponsored the AA suit

LibertyRep:
Before nko.

Anyways the main thing is the AI of PDP's petition

Dead on arrival

fergie001:
Every four years, they come with the same exclusion of candidate, .mtchew

This petition is vexatious, frivolous and lacks merit.

Person wey dem suppose fine

These are very frivolous and vexatious issues

BluntCrazeMan:
But it was established.??

Remember you earlier said that: “The Documents and BVAS-Machines were DUMPED at the Election Petition Tribunal, and cannot be admitted as evidence..”

So, which evidence were then used to establish the so-called Non-Compliance which you are now saying that it is not substantial.??

It was established to a minor scale. I never told you that nothing will be established after all theres no perfect election. I never told you that the bvas cannot be admitted. I told you they will admit it but later trash it... I told you based on evidences PDP tabled, it wasn't enough to prove substantial noncompliance plus the witnesses defeated the case

BluntCrazeMan:
Thanks so much..

If they agreed to the non-compliance,, then there is great hope.

The non compliance was not substantial