PrecisionFx: Lagos was not, is not and will never be no yoruba land. ...
Youre simply delusional.
Keep deluding yourself. You sound foolish and uninformed with your argument here. Give your head a wobble for a minute or so maybe you might acquire some common sense
As i said before, Lagos is Yorubaland yesterday, today and forever more.
Lagosianssic and their glorious communities have been in existence before the country Portugal was ever formed.
Are you refuting the above statement?
I leave you to wallow in your ignorance, if that is what you're teaching yourself than you obviously need to STOP and THINK .
Lagos is NOT "no mans land" as people often romantacize.
When we say Lagos is No mans land, is often correctly seen as a praise- name with respect to the hospitality and genorousity of lagosians making a cool and nice place for all Nigerians to live, work and prosper similar to places as London, Frankfurt, New York, e.t.c
Culture is the art and custom that characterise a particular society or nation. A lot of Nigerians, especially the youth have desist from the Nigerian traditional way of life due to influences from external bodies and ignorance. Below, are ways to promote and protect our culture: ... 4) Nigerian native languages should be taught in elementary and secondary schools, even in tertiary institution. 6) All Nigerians must learn how to speak their native languages ...
Great article, totally agree with you.
I will concentrate on number 4 and 6 here.
Lets assume three major Nigerian Languages: Hausa, Ibo and Yoruba.
(a)All Hausa speaking areas and the hinterlands are to create into their education system the enviroment whereby from elementary to tertiary institution, the Hausa language is compulsory and is used to teach all subjects. Ibo & Yoruba are elective subjects, students are to pick one.
(b) All Ibo speaking areas and the hinterlands are to create into their education system the enviroment whereby from elementary to to tertiary institution, the Ibo language is compulsory and is used to teach all subjects. Hausa & Yoruba are elective subjects, students are to pick one.
(c) All Yoruba speaking areas and the hinterlands are to create into their education system the enviroment whereby from elementary to tertiary institution, the Yoruba language is compulsory and is used to teach all subjects. Hausa & Ibo are elective subjects, students are to pick one.
Apart from the fact that the enviroment that allows for these type of conditions to hold will sustain numerous breakthroughs often in all our daily lives, especially in the science and technology sector.
Will further improve our correlation and communicational skills.
At a certain point in time after the implementation of these policies into the current education system, every Nigerian that passes through the new and improved version will be versed in two Nigerian Languages. Leading to a further boost in the Nations productivity.
PrecisionFx: There is nothing like homeland in Nigeria, everyone here na visitor that migrated to this places at one point.
Thats just royally incorrect. Its a senseless argument.
When we say Lagos is No mans land, its NOT meant as to be take literally its more of praise in hospitality and genorousity of the lagosians making a cool and nice place for all Nigerians to live, work and prosper similar to places as New York, Parris, Shanghai e.t.c
According to African history, Lagos is always known as a Yoruba homeland before even Portugal came into existence.
Iyaloja and Babaloja are major in the royal institutions, often, used to govern the smooth runnings of their jurisdictions.
Appreciate the rules and laws of the land and God will breathe goodness into your everyday lives.
Rossikk: Really? But they've still got our billions of pounds (or trillions, considering it was a 70 year rule). Why should we forget that and ''move on"?
And now they're giving us advice? Dude please, don't annoy me this evening. The least they can do is STFU. They're in no position to criticise corruption in Nigeria while still holding on to their loot from this country.
Exactly the way i see it too.
Dissolve or re-negotiate all the ill-judges PACTS that amounts to day light robbery.
How can foreign companies be minning African soils in 2019?
When there are many egineneers and scientist in Africa that are unemployed, ready and willing to work for their country.
Reaping the benefits of my labour. What type of corruption is that?
Anyway, those that participate in the exploitation of African soil for the benefit of non-Africans should only expect a one-way ticket to HELL or its equivalent.
In fact, I was looking at a listing (although an incomplete listing) of the Kings of Kush and interestingly I found the name of the first king of Kush to be Alara.
That seems to me be suspiciously the same as the name [b]Alárá[b] often repeatedly mentioned (in Yoruba people's folklores) as the first ruler of an unspecified dynasty.
TAO11: No wonder the Native Americans came in their traditional attire to pay homage to the Ooni of Ife when he visited the U.S. a few years ago.
Exactly, there are distinct and undeniable found connection between the indigenous Americans with much of mainland African culture.
There are various theories to explain that, one of the leading theories is an African viewpoint; indigenous Americans are said to have descend from the Olmecs.
According to Jose Melar, the Olmecs are supposed to have migrated from Africa (is comprehensively addressed in the “Olmec alternative origin...” documents).
Modern day African historians identify Olmecs with the Mandé people.
TAO11: Please tell me more about this image of Shango here. Is this statue in Sudan?
Cos I recently read a work by the great historian and anthropologist Cheikh Anta Diop viz. "The African Origin of Civilization" wherein he cited Pédrals' reference to Morié that Shango once ruled the Nubians, the Kush kingdom to be precise.
This testimony by Morié is said by Pédrals to have been found in a Coptic text translated from the Arabic and published (actually outside of Africa) in Paris, France, in the year 1666.
Cheikh Anta Diop's reference to Pédrals on the subject is as follows:
"As Morié puts it, this Obba-Kouso was born at Ife, a locality which our author is completely unacquainted."
It interestingly continues to state that:
"Chango-Obba-Kouso's brothers are Dada, god of nature, and Ogoun, god of hunters and black smiths. He has three wives: Oya, Osoun, and Oba."
It further continues to call him as:
"King of Kush"
[Pédrals, pp. 30-31]
It is important to mention that Cheikh Anta Diop, just as Pédrals, emphasized that Morié himself has absolutely no idea where Ife (the city whose name he takes from the Coptic text) is.
Also, the parallel between the two titles:
"Obba-Kouso" and "King of Kush" is amazingly very striking.
Indeed, the Yorubas obviously have this phrase "King of Kush" among their epithets of Shango for centuries without even realizing it, yet speculating different hypothetical meanings for it. Thanks to the ancient Arabic text of the Copts.
I 100% agree with your post and will add the video to act as corroborating proof.
The Origins Of Humanity: featuring Dr Cheikh Anta Diop (Senegalese historian, anthropologist, physicist who studied the human race’s origin and pre- colonial African culture)
Its important to note that although Diop speaks fluent French, is immediately translated from French into English by the translator in the video.
Onelaw: Sango is Africa s greatest King as Dr. Cheik is most certainly the greatest African anthropologist.
Ife is in Nigeria
Oduduwa the great grand father of Sango is said to have migrated him and all his followers to IFE from Moroe Some say he came from Arabia Either way East Africa was ruled by Nubia during that time
600 years ago Africans ruled the Ottomon Empire The Roman Empire and both Americas
All these empires bowed to Nubia the home of the Gods
The God's are the Angels the Bachwezi progenitors sometimes called Annuaki
I meet a Sudanese who told me that his ethnic group has an oral history that speaks to how Nubians the world's tallest people came to be giants
He said that his people mated with the Angels who were extremely tall themselves
Oduduwa was exceptionally tall and most of the people that came with him were exceptionally tall
As for America the Nubias set up the Mexico civilization building with lesser material than their forefathers yet still impressive They set up empires in the Americas Mayans and Incas The Inca king was the head king of the Americas he spoke Hebrew and Arabic
Once we understand Africans were the first people of the Earth and they built civilization on every part of it then the only to do is praise the ancestors for their greatness
Absolutely, i 100% agree with the spirit of your post.
However, Africa predates Asia in years that amount into their hundreds and thousands. The Emperor Oduduwa came out of Yorubaland in Nigeria, his kingdom a major influence on Ancient Egypt, Arabia, and various other world civilisations.
Apollux: But BTW how did Egypt betray African civilization.
Because they sold-out in a stupendous way, Africans created KM.T and yet, when the Ancient Egyptians excelled to greater heights, they ignored the mainland and instead chose to befriend Asia and Europe. That began the slippery slope, eventually they got invaded and due to their outright betrayal didnt receive support from the mainland.
It was common instances whereby they sided with the enemy in numerous failed attempts to conquer the mainlan. They failed woefuly everytime thanks to the people of Sudan and their impossible accuracy with the long bow.
Many agressive forces backed by the Ancient Egyptians are pushed away from the gates of Sudan in body bags, most with arrows hanging out inbetween their eyes.
Apollux: Trust me the transatlantic wasn't as bad as the transsahara slave trade. The transatlantic didn't last up to 200 years, the transsahara lasted more than a thousand years. See the transatlantic trade had surviors and their descendants, who are the African-Americans of today. The transsahara slaves didn't have surviors. The male where castrated so they couldn't have children. The women were sex slaves. So u hardly hear of people that were the descendants of the transatlantic slave trade But BTW how did Egypt betray African civilization.
Yes i am aware of the fact that the Arabs and the horific transsahara campaign, they started it.
The subject of Trans Atlantic gets my blood boiling and more importantly is very toxic. Many are tricked to believe they are going to KM.T, some are tricked that they are going to a wonderful place, a better place, but instead forcefully shipped to different locations on the planet to help build the rest of the world; especially Europe and The Americas.
Africans built from the bottom up much of Europe and the Americas.
And is definitely one of the worst atrocities ever committed towards any group of people anywhere in the world.
Apollux: Slavery in Africa is a relatively recent thing. The transatlantic slave trade is less than 500 years ago, while the Arabian Sahara slave trade is less than 1500 years ago. When we talk about African civilization, we are talking about events of more than 6000 years old. African civilization was not as powerful as it once was when the Arabs and Europeans came in contact with us for the slave trade. Okey lets take the 1st Italian Ethiopian war for instance. Though Ethiopia wan the war, but they fought with over a hundred thousand solders as against the Italians that fought with just few tens of thousands. The 2nd war between then saw the Italians completely over coming the Ethiopians because of more advanced military weapons. Like I said African civilization fell because other civilizations advanced, grew, invented superior military weapons...
I agree with your analysis here, but all because of Africs's Ancient Egypt being in the hands of foreigners. i.e Asia and Europe.
If Ancient Egypt didnt sell-out, they (the foreigners) wouldnt have been able to develop superior military weponry as quick and as reliable as the Ancient Egyptian technology allows. And more importantly, Africans would have had assess to their own technologies managed by Ancient Egypt.
Furthernore, the horrors of the Trans Atlatic is equally HUGE factor no doubt.
What happened in Ancient Egypt was Criminal and the Ancient Egyptians themselves are to share blame for their utter lack of judgement.
The Egypt story is a living lesson on how not to behave when you are unbelievably powerful. Always take care of those that are weaker around you because you might not know what the future holds; maybe if the Ancient Egyptians had faced inwards with their kindness, wealth and power, they would have been rescued permanently when their troubles arose.
Apollux: See I'm not saying Africa did not have an an old civilization, Africa did. It had one of the oldest and flourishing civilization. But sumer predates it.
That is just a nonsensical statement to make, read that back to yourself a few times and maybe you might realise my point.
The above statement is a famous Eurocentric assertion ; is false and reads as a nonsense.
Heres the accutate version, i.e as it supposs to read without the extra comment:
Apollux: See I'm not saying Africa did not have an an old civilization, Africa did. It had one of the oldest and flourishing civilization..
Apollux: Sorry sir but it's not slavery that brought African civilizations down, it was conquest. Old Egyptian kingdom got conquered by Babylon which was in turn conquered by the Persians. They were conquered by the Europeans, Greeks and Romans. Later on the Persians got back up and fought the eastern arm of the Roman empire to a stand still. The two empires were so exhausted from the constant wars that when the rag tag Mohammedan Arabs came they easily conquered Persia and some of Europe. Then the Mongols too came along conquering same as the Turks. The truth is that the history of civilization is a history of conquest. When the Europeans came to Africa, they came with superior technology, which shows that their civilization had outgrown ours over the years. Though there were few skirmishes and wars between us and them, they won because they had guns and we don't. Slavery was the result of the victory tbey gained over us. Besides we credit the Europeans with the invention of guns but it was actually the Chinese that invented gun powder first, as far back as 1000bc. Do you know that Africa already had papyrus, a kind of paper made from the reeds of the red sea and Nile thousands of years before before Europeans. The Chinese already had rice paper before Europeans. The truth is if any civilization stays static, it gets outdated soon enough by more advancing and aggressive ones. African civilizations lost to others because we remained old and didn't advance not because of slavery. We should stop blaming slavery for our backwardness.
Eventhough i agree with you that Ancient Egypt brought down African civilisation, the combination of the stupendous betrayal of the Ancient Egyptians coupled with the horrors of the Trans Atlantic began a slipery slope towards realising the true African Identity. They are both the cause.
OGOg: No sir The Sumerian civilization predates the flood, most believe that the book of genesis was actually adapted from Sumerian documentation. The cuneiform Sumerian texts u quoted has been dated to about 22000 b.c , even the Egyptian civilization predates the flood as evidenced by the water weathering on the sphinx in Giza demonstrating clearly that it was there during the flood, when it was exposed to heavy rain. Gobeklii tepe, estimated to be a pre-flood monument has reliefs of extinct pre-flood caving on stones. These are also verifiable
I hear you.
However, which flood are you refering to, because there are quite a few flood stories. I know of atleast 25 different flood stories. Most only are aware of the ONE that the jews saved for them
Gobeklii tepe is the first religious gathering to appear in Europe but is definately NOT the birth place of civilisation because that belongs to Africa.
Apollux: See I'm an African and my sympathy will definitely want to sway to that but facts remained facts. Now civilization is different from human ancestry or where human developed from. It is different from earliest settlements. Though civilization does grow out of settlement but before a settlement can be called a civilization several things must be there. One food, building of monument and cities, having a civil governance with a standing army or military force. Now with these in mind, civilization started in three parts of the world almost at the same time between 3500 bc to 2500 bc. These places are the Indus River basin area, the Nile Valley and the fertile crescent of the euphrates and Tigris. Among these three, Euphrates is the oldest around 3200bc,while that of Egypt was around 3100bc. That of the Indus River was further down 2500 bc. There were other civilization that grew independently from these like the Aztecs and Mayans but they were much later. All other civilizations came from these. The sumerians led to the babylonians, Akkadians assyrians, Persians. While the Egyptians lead to that of Sudan or vise versa, nothing is so sure at these point.
Forget Eurocentric rhetoric, the main point is that Nile Valley civilisation predates that of Mesopotamia.
Civilisation didn’t exist within a vacuum.
It’s universally agree upon by the vast majority of African centred historians, scholars and academics, the fact that civilisation moved down the Nile.
Furthermore, similar traits can be found elsewhere around the globe, whereby the way earlier civilisations influences newer ones is no different to the way our continent experienced there’s, especially when bodies of waters dominate or when they are simply present in and around the terrain of focus.
Hence, there are numerous civilisations that occurs in Africa prior to the creation of either KM.T or Sumeria.
musicwriter: Human civilization did not begin in Summer. All the sciences says that human civilization began in Africa. If you could find 22,000 years old anything in ancient Summer, you could find a 13 million years old Lucy skeleton in Africa.
Things could become clearer once the Europeans realease all our historical items they have locked in a scientific relief and or museum. Although its fair to say, if one puts in the effort to study our items as is, the results are equally acceptable.
musicwriter: Thanks for that bro, but the maths of geometry is what was used in constructing the pyramids at Gizah thousands of years before Pythagoras was born.
Pythagoras himself studied geometry here in Africa. Pythagoras, Plato, Socrates, Aristotle, were all students in Africa. There were no other school any place in the world at that time where anybody would have gotten educated at that time.
In the book, the Kybalion, the author (a white man) states ''Egypt, the home of the Pyramids and the Sphinx, was the birthplace of the Hidden Wisdom and Mystic Teachings. From her Secret Doctrine all nations have borrowed. India, Persia, Chaldea, Medea, China, Japan, Assyria, ancient Greece and Rome, and other ancient countries partook liberally at the feast of knowledge which the Hierophants and Masters of the Land of Isis so freely provided for those who came prepared to partake of the great store of Mystic and Occult Lore which the masterminds of that ancient land had gathered together.
In ancient Egypt dwelt the great Adepts and Masters who have never been surpassed, and who seldom have been equaled, during the centuries that have taken their processional flight since the days of the Great Hermes. In Egypt was located the Great Lodge of Lodges of the Mystics. At the doors of her Temples entered the Neophytes who afterward, as Hierophants, Adepts, and Masters, traveled to the four corners of the earth, carrying with them the precious knowledge which they were ready, anxious, and willing to pass on to those who were ready to receive the same''
Note that in those ancient time, knowledge like mathematics was considered mysticism. Pythagoras himself went back to Europe after his education and continued to teach it as mysticism...
I agree with you here. The so called "Greek Miracle" is a fraud and not a miracle at all, rather, a viscious exploitation of African intellect.
Apollux: Sorry sir it wasn't the Bible that made that claim it is history. The Bible never made a claim that civilization started in Sumer. It is proven that the earliest form of civilization is found in sumar. Civilization is different from settlement. The earliest form of writing is the cuneiform used on clay tablets and it is from the sumarians. Egyptian hieroglyphics is a more advanced form of it. The sumer civilizations predated the 1st Babylonia, Akkadian, the Hittites etc. The oldest form of writing is the cuneiform. Research it.
Those are unfounded Eurocentric rhetoric, untrue.
Africa predates summeria in years that amount to hundred of thousands.
Egyptian hieroglyphics are a form of Sudanese hieloglyphics and not Summeria.
Summeria rose up when Ancient Egypt was at the heights of its development; Ancient Egypt was created by fellow Africans from regions on the continent that already been in existence for thousands upon thousands of years. i.e Sudan, Nigeria, Ghana, Chad, Niger, Benin Republic, Cameroon, Mali, Togo, Cote d'ivoire, Guinea, Mauritania, Ethiopia, Somalia, Kenya, Uganda, Burundi, Congo e.t.c
The oldest form of writting is that of an African community.
Africa owns the first verbal language and written text.
mrkings84: The whites will never let the world know the true history of the black race. So much talent and creativity. My question till this day is, where did it all start to go wrong?
It started in the garden of Eden near Egypt
Well i agree with much of your post, plus the fact that the complications began in Egypt no doubt i also agree.
As for the concept of "Garden of Eden" its best to look at that philosophically, as in, if at all the garden of Eden really exists, then you will not find it in Egypt; you have a better chance of finding the so-called Garden of Eden in Nigeria than Egypt.
Due to the huge amount of misinformation and false assertions of foreigners, to truly get understanding African history, certain conditions are to hold; one is to disregard foreign rhetoric, foreign hear say and all other anti-African discourse with regards to history.
Furthermore, to regard African history as genuine, If not written, deliberated-upon or judged by Africans to being correct and accurate beyond reasonable doubt, such writings that fit into these category must, for now, simply be deemed inadmissable.
I.e The false assertion that "Gobekli Tepe" is suppose to be the birth of civilisation; stop using these false assertions.
Before "Gobekli Tepe", civilisation occurs in Africa numerous times already; civilisation doesnt occur in a vacuum.
Throughtout human history, its an undeniable fact that great civilisation often influences future great civilisations.
Ultimately, Africa is the phenomenon that is responsible for the civilisation of the world and NOT colonisation.
OGOg: U really need to read wide with an unbiased mind. The earliest civilization is Mesopotamia (Sumerian) The 22000 year old Sumerian text is a testament to that. Gobeklii tepe in Turkey is another old pre-flood civilization. The information given to u above are documented facts and verifiable
Absolute Euricentric gibberish and are the ones that needs refuting. These arent based on scientific conclusions, rather are loosely based on out dated Eurocentric and Asian bias.
Africa owns the first civilisation, thats simply common sense.
There’s need to understand that the way Africans operate in the ancient times cannot be crosschecked by making use of Eurocentric and or Asian bias text or viewpoints.
Furthermore, the greatest significance of "Gobekli Tepe" is shroud in the myth that it supposedly the birth place of civilisation, however, that is 100% untrue, it's sacred significance however, is in the fact that the people who built "Gobekli Tepe" are rightfully deemed the first religious gathering to come out of Europe.
African historians have been proven to be more trustworthy than their Eurocentric and Asian peers in the determination of African history.
Its in my opinion that Ancient Sudan is more important to Africa then Ancient Egypt will ever be.
If one put the necessary effort to study the true African history, it will soon be clear that Ancient Egypt betrayed the mainland and Sudan are redeemed as the REAL heroes. Defenders of the African mainland. Internationally reknowned for their impossible accuracy with the long bow.
Furthermore, as Op eloquently determines, Ancient Sudan is deemed a major influence on Ancient Egypt. Its clear to see why African historians deem that to be an accurate assessment.
RedboneSmith: Even your picture shows the reddish-brown Egyptian type and the black Nubian type...
Goes to show your ignorance on Egyptology.
Its a known common cultural practice of the KM.T they sometimes paint themselves with thier favourite cherished colours
Ancient Egyptian men if not depicted with their true colours black, brown or bronze; sometimes depict tbemselves with the colour red-brown - meant as to symbolize Life, Fire, Victory, Anger, Hostility and Vhaos.
Ancient Egyptian women if not depicted with their true colours black, brown or bronze; sometimes depict tbemselves with the colour yellow-brown - meant as to symbolize Imperishable, Eternal and Indestructible.
All manufactured religions i.e Abrahamic Religions, are all fake, false, counter-intuitive and majorly unfit for the African purpose(s).
Question: What are the African purpose(s)?
Answer: Leadership, unity and collective progression.
African spirituality is the standard that all and every manufactured religion in human history is derived from.
Conclusion, African spirituality is in itself real, concise, definate, and unchangeable; meaning more than real or genuine; that which was, is and shall always be real and incorruptible in terms of permanence and lasting; whilst manufactured religions are considered to be real or genuine but are in all reality fake, false, counter-intuitive and majorly unfit for the African purpose(s).
caye: NORMALLY, I TRY NOT TO ANSWER FOOLS BUT ONLY THOSE WILLING TO LEARN 1. The whole of Africa most esp. N.Africa had always been dominated and occupied by black people. 2. Nubia & Egypt were founded, ruled and made glorious by black people as founders 3. During this period, the European was still a savage 4. To become civilised, Greek scholars had to travel to Egypt to learn from black Africans : medicine- Hippocrates learning from the priests of Imhotep ( the father of ancient medicine; a full Blackman); Pythagoras learning his ' stolen 'theorem from Nubian and Egyptian builders and mathematicians, the Christian cross gotten from the Egyptian Ankh- the religion of ancient Egypt and Nubia 5. With time, due to the 'mental disease' of the black man - self hatred/ self sabotage, we lost our glory 6. Greek invasion, Roman invasion and finally the Arab invasion 7. In the Sudan, the Arabs mated with black women giving rise to the half- caste Africans called Sudanese ( look at Barak Obama and Jerry Rawlings skins) 8. To entrench their genes, sytematic slavery and subjugation of the black skin was invented. No one wants to lose his genes as the black gene is biologically more dominant and expressive than white/ Arab genes. 9. The religion of the Arabs and the later- invented Christian religion of the Romans have been systematically proven efficient in keeping the African in a spiritual and mental wilderness ( remember the burning of the library of Alexandra( African name removed by the Greek king Alexander); where the wisdom of black Africans painfully gathered over thousands of years was destroyed in a very short period by the new fanatical state religion of Christianity plunging Africans in spiritual darkness 9. You are not a descendant of slaves but of Kings who brought light to the world. STOP BELIEVING (unconsciously) THAT YOU WERE MEANT TO SERVE THE WHITE/ARAB RACE. may Olodumare open your eyes, amin
TheIkoro: I WAS referring to Wole Soyinka. I'll do my own research to try and confirm whether or not he's the first black person to win the Nobel Prize in Literature - or in absolutely any field, as I initially thought. But, be that as it may, my allegation still stands. And your excuse does not.
Wole Soyinka is in no way near being young, he's almost ninety years old - eighty-five, as of this year; if Wikipedia is to be believed. And that not one of you all could think to mention EVEN ONCE a Nobel Laureate (THE FIRST BLACK NOBEL LAUREATE - even if only in Literature) as one of those black men that have influenced you the most, makes me have to re-state my allegation.
Do have a re-think over the type of values you have.
I dont know what your argument is all about.
In my opinion the op's question dictates how to determine the list.
"Who Do You Think Is The Most Influential Black Man To Have Ever Lived?"
Since your initial comment, I am the first to respond and as such acknowledge Wole Soyinka for his genius.
Wole Soyinka is up there as one the most influential black men in the world today. I know his age yet its in my opinion that hes still young and has much more to give us.
Wole Soyinka is the first person to have introduced me to the African narrative. Without his genius, and thankfully for me and countless people that he has touched with his intellect; that i probably would not have been quick to determine the falsities peddled by "Western" and Asiatic rhetoric.
My appreciation of Wole Soyinka and his great and inspiring works on Literature and beyond knows no bound.
SluttanSlayer: There is a new scientific evidence from DNA research that has shown that Europe and not Africa is the cradle of humanity . This then makes the Negriod recent specie of mankind.
All evidence points to African lineage from the son of Ham and Naamah who is the patriarch of the Cushite or Nefroid race
Just see how African genius is limited to the diabolical .
All these newcomers trying to write their grandfathers history.
Africans are tamtamount to the ones that parent the rest of humanity.
Arabs and Europeans are two of the more latest communities to arrive on the global stage, that suggest that African people and their glorious communities are in existence tbousands upon tbousands of years prior to both Arab and European current existence.
Initially there are only Africans living on planet earth, Africans migrated during the "Out of Africa" experience and still the only people living on planet Earth are black, brown or bronze African.
Two distinct phenomenon occur simultaneously:
(1)Geological phenomena i.e. Ice Age
(2)Biological phenomena i.e African women are granted a unique special ability that allows giving birth to non-African looking offspring.
These two distinct phenomenon are said to have combined to create the environment for the new ethnic groups that would later join the African on planet Earth.
They, the Asiatic extreemist and Eurocentrics try their best to control minds, soul and discourse.
Africans needs to defend against these evil plotters and re-develop our own minds, re-enforce our souls towards the African cause and maintain our discourse forever more.
I truly believe that Africa is a living fortress that conceals in her the solutions to all worldly problems.
I hope and pray that all of us may be one with our great continent and continue to make her proud forever more, for the betterment of the entire world.