₦airaland Forum

We already know what most ladies will do when they discover at the early stages that a guy is after them just for sex. But what will ladies do in a situation where the relationship is 3 years old and the guy has been nice, then she discovers that sex has been the only reason why he has been in the relationship? Will ladies walk out or carry on with the relationship?

At the start it wouldnt be easy, but as time goes on everyone will get used to it and the flesh would no longer be as attractive as before.

If Nigerians were educated all this wouldnt have been an issue. Who the fool will raise such rumor in advanced countries cos he knows some citizens have labs in their houses.
Which Nigerian get time to setup lab for house? All the available rooms will be filled with something more important: GARRI

Nigerians in UK are the ones doing the rating.

Libkid: How does dat change price of fuel 4 market

When did statements like this become too frequent on Nairaland? Seriously even if you buy fuel for N1000 per litre are you saying you will never watch movies anymore? Abeg there is time for everything.

Irritating

richarts: Game?... Well I dnt get bt sexually if u dnt mind, muslim girls r somwat circumcised. Its so painful mhen. Dated 1 last year. She visited me in the morning & we had to wait till like 6pm before we made love. She kudnt get wet for a lonnnnngggggg time. Aside dat, dunno. Dem b like anyoda chick naaw.

1nce u lov a girl all oda tins r secondary.

I thought they are barred from having anything to do with the infidels before we talk of making love with an infidel.

AK 48: Guy,there is nothing like an ugly man,if you have money.if I ask u to name an ugly male minister,can u tell me 1?

Women are the worst hit by the ugly syndrome,while men hide their ugliness with money,everybody knows dat

How would the senario change if money is pulled out of this?

AK 48: Guy,there is nothing like an ugly man,if you have money.if I ask u to name an ugly male minister,can u tell me 1?

Women are the worst hit by the ugly syndrome,while men hide their ugliness with money.

Ok lets remove money out of the picture.

Sometime last year I came across a certain muslim lady, I liked her but religion was the barrier cos I didnt know what to expect. I thought about everything associated with islam and decided to forget about her. But am sure their mind gets into it only that it doesnt get past the burqa shield. Mukina is probably a muslim chic and she visits here to read and pick romance topics for frontpage. This means her mind is there. Another possible muslim chic is chillaz. I remember she once opened a thread titled: "why are men difficult to please?" This thread is a kind of thread that non muslim ladies who have had several guys will open based on their experience. So how did chillaz know that? ** I hope no one gets 100 strokes of koboko soon** Well, it shows her mind is there too.

Anyway the question I want to ask is: has anyone had an encounter with a muslim chic? What sort of scenario are we to expect?

Most people dissociate themselves from anything ugly. But that hasnt prevented the ugly folks from getting a mate. Though it may not be as easy as that handsome dude or pretty lady would find a mate. Between guys and ladies who does ugliness affect their chances of finding a mate the most? And who feels extremely bad more than the other when someone says to them: YOU ARE UGLY?

That looks like boko harams control centre.

abubello: www.answering-christianity.com/

whats "christianity" doing in that link?

Iran claimed Saturday it has successfully test-fired an upgraded version of a short-range ballistic missile with improved accuracy, increasing the Islamic Republic's capability to strike both land and naval targets.
Defense Minister Gen. Ahmad Vahidi said the solid-fueled Fateh-110 has a range of 300 kilometers (185 miles). He claimed the weapon could strike with pin-point precision, making it the most accurate weapon of its kind in Iran's arsenal.
"By reaching this generation of the Fateh-110, a new capability has been added to our armed forces in striking sea and land targets," state TV quoted Vahidi as saying. "Few countries in the world possess the technology to build such missiles."
Iran's military leaders have said they believe future wars will be air- and sea-based and Tehran has sought to upgrade its air defense systems and naval power in anticipation of such a possibility.
Iran has also been pushing to upgrade its missiles, which already can target Israel and U.S.bases in the Middle East. The Pentagon released a report in June noting significant advances in Iranian missile technology, acknowledging that the Islamic Republic has improved the accuracy and firing capabilities of its missiles.
The Fateh-110, or Conqueror, is a single-stage solid-propellant, surface-to-surface missile put into service in 2002. The earlier version of the domestically-produced missile had a range of 200 kilometers (120 miles). The weapon was developed by Iran's Aerospace Industries Organization.
Iran also has a variety of longer-ranged missiles including a Shahab-3 variant with a range of 2,000 kilometers (1,200 miles) that can reach Israel and southern Europe. Many of its missiles could in theory carry a nuclear warhead.
Iran considers both the United Statesand Israel as potential adversaries. Neither country has ruled out a military strike against Iran's nuclear program, which they claim is aimed at developing nuclear technology. Iran says its program is for peaceful purposes.
Israel is about 1,000 kilometers (600 miles) away from Iran's western borders, while the U.S. Navy's Fifth Fleet is based in Bahrain, some 200 kilometers (120 miles) from Iranian shores in the Persian Gulf.
Iran's military leaders have threatened that Israel "would disappear from the Earth" if it attacks Iran. Military commanders have also warned that 35 American military bases in the Middle East are within Iran's missile range and would be destroyed within seconds after any U.S. attack on Iran.
Iran launched an arms development program during its 1980-88 war with Iraq to compensate for a U.S. weapons embargo. Since 1992, Iran has produced its own tanks, armored personnel carriers, missiles, torpedoes and a fighter plane.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/story/2012-08-04/iran-missiles/56768478/1?csp=34news&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+usatoday-NewsTopStories+%28News+-+Top+Stories%29

If the president was white I wonder if this thread will exist.

Nairaland hasnt stop our politicans at our door step from misbehaving, I wonder how they stopped a company thousand of miles away from airing an advert. It must have been one of the coca cola staff who spotted and alerted the team about something wrong in the ad.

sosoluv: Trying to prove urself like a bad-azz or what?

What do you mean by bad arse? I only exposed the hole in your post. Whatever you mean by that.

sosoluv: trust me some guys sell themselves out faster than they think they can hold up the act

Thank God you said "some" which means the other some will succeed. Once again just hope for luck not to fall into the hands of the other some.

sexkillz: [color=#000030]True. Personally, i advocate the "longer the better." The results of will still be based on the individuals grouped. If you group a 100 people today and another 100 tomorrow, the percentage that would lean to any particular scenario would differ on both days. . .

Difficult though.
[/color]

If we combine the two samples of 100 taken on different days to make it 200 taken same day, there would still be a favourable scenario.

sosoluv: 7days later doesnt work for me. i might discover really annoying things about a guy and thing will just get complicated, i might consider the guy i have taken time to get to know

Even 1 year will not be enough for you to "know" the guy. Believe me. Especially when he is a prof pretender. Just hope for luck.

sexkillz: [color=#000030]None! The probability in each scenario is subjective to individuality. . .
[/color]

Yes it depends on individuals. But let me put it this way; if 100 ladies are chosen at random, how do you think the percentage will be shared between the two cases? Definitely a certain type of ladies will show one of the cases to more effective than the other.

Case 1: A guy toasts a resisting lady for a year and she finally accepts.

Case 2: A guy toasts a lady and she accepts 7 days later.

which of the above cases will a lady appreciate a guy better after she agrees to allow the guy in?

Some of us will say since it took the lady in case 1 a whole year to know the guy better therefore her love will be more geniune. But what if she finaly agreed cos she could no longer withstand the pressure and disturbance and decides to manage him cos there is no other better person among the pack of chykers?
Some other posters may say that the lady in case 2 will appreciate the guy better because she found the guy too lovely and hard to resist. But what if the lady was too overwhelmed with the guy's mind blowing physicals that she overlooked his bad inner qualities?

What do you folks think? Which of the two cases above will the probabilty of a lady liking the guy better be higher?

cindyrella: Why do u wanna know?

So we can prove the statistic below to be right or wrong.

azuson: believe it or not 80% of women marry someone they don't truly love.

It seems a lot of people are managing their partners cos getting that ideal person isnt that easy. Most times its either you like someone and the person doesnt like you back or the person likes you and you dont like the person back. In fact if you are lucky enough to find someone who likes you strongly as much as you like the person then both of you need to kill a cow. Well, half loaf is better than none so most of us end up managing someone we partialy like. I guess this partly explains why so many unions go wrong in a short while.
Anyway, the question of this thread is, are you currently dating someone you sincerely love or are you managing a half loaf or someone you partially like to keep your lips busy?

gramci: I beg to disagree, America is helping to make the world a safer place.

Yeah. As long as there is something to benefit.

snowdrops: And to use the NL cliche. . . .

How does that change the price of Garri in the Market.

Thats one of the many reasons why Nigeria is lagging behind. The thought of the average Nigerian is centered on garri.

This is a "racist" thread and it should be locked.

Anybody with common sense should know all these.

It seems GEJ is solely taking the blame for everything going wrong in the life of Nigerians. Even when a fly drops on one's fufu it would be amazing how GEJ will be attached to it. I know GEJ is chief executive of Nigeria with huge powers, but what about the governors, the NASS, the ministers, advisers, the powerfull opposing figures behind the scenes and even the corrupt masses themselves? Are these elements not contributing in one way or the other in making life difficult for Nigerians?

A lot of Nigerians have resorted to running out of the country to escape the ugly situation of things in Nigeria. This simply means that these folks are seeking for greener pastures in a foreign land which they never made a contributing to cultivate. In other words they want to reap from where they didnt sow. Do Nigerians deserve what they get in foreign lands for running away from their homeland problems rather than fixing it?

hrhobi1: YOU SO SO STEWPID AND FO-OLISH MAN . DROP DEAD YOU BA.STARD

Who be this goat? Sorry to disappoint you. Am still bouncing alive.