₦airaland Forum

Habiyo:
because you know too well Emir or Sultan is not traditional title but religious title. The End of Fulani is very very close. they must go with their religion of war.

You don't know the Traditional titles simply has a religious component? Lol you weirdos love speaking for the Hausas like they have no agency. Lol I dont even care for the existence of monarchies. Titles of nobility are pointless. Its only you weirdos stressing yourself over vestigial institutions.

kufre2010:
Yes they do, as I am typing this, they are agitating to break away from Fulanis. They called themselves middle belt.

Islamic Tradition cannot replace African Tradition, never. it is a matter of time.

Ok son you're not hausa but you're speaking for them. Africans adopted Islamic traditions dont make such a simple issue difficult to understand. Calling yourself middle belt doesn't mean a thing.

Traditional titles are administrated by the state governments the can alter and abolish them at will. If they really wanted to end it would be done just like how it was in Kano with little to no effort. The fact is this whining starts and stops on nairaland.

kufre2010:
It will be a mistake to consider Islamic chiefs against real African Traditional leaders or Chiefs when drafting the new constitution

Did the Hausa living in this area tell you they do t want their current monarchs? Why do you feel the need to decide for them what is African and not African enough? Again why even bother with a monarchy in this imaginary scenario.

Mm

DubaiLandLord:
Must you guys always wail

Lol even if you gave them the answer to solve their problems they'll just whine some more. The Igbos are separated and nothing will be done about since nobody is really interested in reunification. Its just hot air and something to complain about endlessly.

Chapter 1 part 2 section 8-2

An Act of the National Assembly for the purpose of boundary adjustment of any existing State shall only be passed if- 

(a) a request for the boundary adjustment, supported by two-thirds majority of members (representing the area demanding and the area affected by the boundary adjustment) in each of the following, namely- 

(i) the Senate and the House of Representatives, 

(ii) the House of Assembly in respect of the area, and 

(iii) the local government councils in respect of the area. is received by the National Assembly; and 

(b) a proposal for the boundary adjustment is approved by - 

(i) a simple majority of members of each House of the National Assembly, and 

(ii) a simple majority of members of the House of Assembly in respect of the area concerned

BKayy:
Even the communities Kogi leveraged on to attain the status are Igbo.
All of them plus the next 6 communities after them.
No be odekpe and others under Ibaji LGA that we all know?

Nigercity:
You saw Igbo speaking communities
You divided them added some in one state and left there others in another state..in fact different geopoltical zones,
An came they other way added few igalas to anambra so that, no one will know what you did

kufre2010:
Our true Hausa chiefs should be brought back.

Are you Hausa? If not what do you mean by our? Its hilarious the people crying about this issue are never the hausa but busy bodies outsiders. Why even have a monarchy to begin with?

Lol knew it.

Emmastan291:
Will that stop them from collecting bribes, killing innocent people and abusing human rights?.

Nothing really unless they're also afraid of you.

The lawmakers asked the executive to step up efforts to amend the 1999 Constitution to enable the creation of state police and other security outfits to address the current insecurity challenges in the country

Lol hisbah police loading. Decentralizing police and prisons still a good thing long term. The federal lawmakers are dumb. This issue can be solved by the by simply deleting the offending section. After that the state assemblies will simply do their jobs and figure out the rest.

Part I: Exclusive Legislative List

45. Police and other government security services established by law.

48. Prisons.

Tell it to the judge.

BluntCrazeMan:
Now is your turn to explain what the “Mines and Minerals” in the exclusive legislative list means.
As far as the happenings in this country are concerned, the Federal Government is only interested in Petroleum and Petroleum-Related Products..

It means they have legal jurisdiction. People are simply violating the laws laws on the books just like they do with illegal bunkering and stealing oil for illegal refineries. Whats the point of this thread?

BluntCrazeMan:
..
(That is, according to the Constitution and the Official Gazettes.)

Whats the point of this thread if you answered your own question? Do you not know how to use the control F function on your device?

Part I: Exclusive Legislative List

39. Mines and minerals, including oil fields, oil mining, geological surveys and natural gas.

BluntCrazeMan:
River Sand, Laterite, Granite, rocks, and Limestone..
They are all forms of Naturally Occurring mineral resources.
And they are under the control of the State Government.

False.

BluntCrazeMan:
Apart from petroleum and all its derivatives and products....,,, are there other Naturally Occurring Resources Which the Federal Government have absolute control over??
(Just the way it has over petroleum)??
..
(That is, according to the Constitution and the Official Gazettes.)

Mineral resources all of of them.

grandstar:
$9b worth of gold is about 180 tons of gold. I totally doubt the figure. I might be persuaded to believe if it was about 30 tons yearly.

Even 30 tons yearly is absurd. Just compare it to the most productive gold mines in the world. These guys are simply inflating the numbers.

Shabaleen:
fish and salt importation? what type of fish is that? whale or shark?

Cod.

Got to love it when idiots decide to burn their bridges. Masari is probably a simp for these weirdos. The demographics of the criminals do matter because it informs the police who to look out for and if there's wrongful discrimination.

“The bandits are criminals, why should you attach tribe to it? That’s why we are not happy. You don’t need to attach a tribe because it will affect an innocent person.

We do need to know who they are. People like to make claims they're mainly foreigners but can't tell you their nationalities or explain why they're never deported. Its also interesting to not how this small group represents a larger portion if crime.

They should find solutions, create ranches for these herders and accommodate them.

You can land and create your own ranches today. Nobody is stopping you.

“The Federal High Court ruling should not breed any confusion as to the obligations of taxpayers. Taxpayers must continue to comply with the Value Added Tax Act pending the final determination of appeal,” the statement said.

Lol if you guys lose again you'll start saying maintain status quo until the Supreme Court rules on it. It should be obvious this case will make it way there shortly.

The infiltration we have from some West African countries and North African countries are also people of the Fulani extraction.

Weird how these fulani have unknown nationalities and we never hear about them being deported back. I still maintain these guys are mostly Nigerians as usual till someone can give names and nationalities of these foreigners.

Land mark case loading. The Supreme Court ruling going to be very interesting. If they rule in favor of the states the federal government will be further incentivef to review the tax code.

Madeu:
This is actually the reason for the removal of ban. Drug war in Nigeria is mostly on weed. Nigeria is not a huge market for the consumption of meth, heroin, and other hard drug. Na person wey never get money chop belleful go see money buy expensive hard drugs.

Then he should be very afraid then if his whole job depends on this stuff being illegal. Why even keep the agency then.

BigRocky:
Your first paragraph explain why I ealier said,"the military has failed in their duty,and this fact's are completely undeniable."

They are to some extent a man can defend himself and his immediate family against AK-47 wielding bandit..

That is why the military and police are equipped to match or even surpasse the fire power of this criminal's.

Did I defend their failure clown? Domt employ strawman arguments to debate points I never brought up. I said people should defend themselves not entrusting their lives to the failures and you want to cry the playing field isn't fair.

lexy2014:
Your answers to them will give u d explanation u seek

Ok conversation is over dont stress yourself if you can't explain your position. I already explained the situation without answering irreverent questions but you can't and or explain your position at the end of the day.

lexy2014:
if u can answer these, then u get d answer which u are requesting:

is it because its a black hawk helicopter that it automatically mean that d helicopter was "left behind"?

did d US leave those equipment for anyone in particular?
somehow, u are running away from d questions

Blue3k:
Both questions are Irrelevant to the definition I gave to left behind so I won't answer it.

If you dont care to explain your position then the conversation is over. You disagree but can't explain why can't and won't simply explain why.

lexy2014:
US military didnt leave weapons in afghanistan

They did leave weapons behind unless you can tell us what really happened.

lexy2014:
still same as above as we have gone beyond that. heres where we are:

lexy2014:
US military didnt leave weapons in afghanistan

Explain your position then with definitions included. Answer the question I'd like to understand why you disagree.

lexy2014:
u are asking d wrong questions because d issues u raised here arent in contention.

lexy2014:
US military didnt leave weapons in afghanistan

How are they the wrong questions? You told us the United States didn't leave weapons. Explain your position then with definitions included.

Even if its legalized on a federal level we all know certain states are well within their authority to ban it. I wish polling agencies would study the issue. The issue will be more popular in certain places and among certain demographics.

BTW he may also be against it for his own financial reasons. The agencies budget can be scaled back if they legalized weed.

lexy2014:
do i agree that what?

The definition of left I provided and fact the US left weapons there like the black hawk helicopter for example. If you dont tell us what happen.

lexy2014:
Am not d one with d problem here. U are d one who said that because it's a black hawk helicopter caught on video, then automatically it was left behind.

Do you disagree or not? If you do tell us what happened.

lexy2014:
That's why I asked u these:

is it because its a black hawk helicopter that it automatically mean that d helicopter was "left behind"?

did d US leave those equipment for anyone in particular?

The conversation is over if you don't disagree they left the weapons behind or the definition I gave. Both questions are Irrelevant to the definition I gave to left behind so I won't answer it. Tell what happened if you dont believe the weapons were left behind no need for semantic games.

lexy2014:
U see where u are confusing urself? Is d discussion about d identity of who left d behind or whether d US left d equipment behind?

NB: Pls take note of "left behind". What does it mean?

Lol they did leave the weapon because they didn't destroy it or take it back with them its that simple. You see the video as evidence they did just that. What happened if they didn't leave it behind.

palsenator:
Please try to get my point... USA bleeped up big time with this untimely evacuation that left several deadly equipments in the hand of the terrorists.

The United clearly stated that they disarm SOME take note of that ... There were some regions that were taken over before any disarmament could take place .. So as expected, they have had access to some weapons.

Thirdly, these weapons can only be used on their soil against their own people. You definitely know that those weapons can never in anyway pose a threat to any far nation other than to fight against any intruder.... Again, one they run out of war heads , there is no way to replace it atleast for now.

Those weapons are obviously on the wrong hand and the people I pity the most are the citizens who are perceived as anti Taliban or pro West..

I can agree with most of those points. The US leaving its stuff behind just leaves do open for it to be sold off to enemies who have the capability to reverse engineer it. The US is no danger for taliban unless the go fight on their turf.