₦airaland Forum

FuckAllTheMODs:
Are you not the same person posting about Imo politics on other threads.

Now, I know your problem: reading, understanding/comprehension...

Did you see any thing relating to their source/origin in this post?

The post is about the slave that were moved to that side during slave trade period and so on.

In that case I carefully read the posts, which is why I always defeat u guys.
In this case I went by only the headline - I posted so someone can summarize (as u just did!), as I didn’t read OP

Chiebunigom1:
Your signature is quite different from your post.
Live by what you preach....smh

There is nothing hateful about my post. Infact it is said in the spirit of love - so someone can summarize as I didn’t read OP

Dansuqi:
Since majority of our politicians write results,what should the court do

As u said, all elections have errors and shenanigans. But that’s why the bar for removing an incumbent is high. After all the games and maneuverings the umpire declares a result. It is VERY IMPORTANT not to change that result unless the documentary proof is unassailable and the reasons crystal clear. INEC declared Ihedioha the winner and Hope 4th place. That’s the baseline. They were not equal - one was the incumbent, the other came FOURTH! You don’t lightly change that.
YOU DON’T DO IT BY REFUSING TO EXAMINE DOCUMENTS OR BY ACCEPTING CLEARLY FRAUDULENT NUMBERS!

So why did a Trump ban them

Na wa

Igbos, always claiming heritages. I thought u were Jews, why Jamaica all of the sudden

.

Gnaeusmagnus:
Zamfara, Bayelsa are.both strange cases, while Imo is a different class of outright weird.

They are lumping the cases together like all the cases are the same. THEY ARE NOT THE SAME!! The Imo case is quite different from all the others!It is not just weird, it is entirely the only case where Supreme Court actually aided and abetted fraud and rigging.

And I think it is quite intentional going by how the SC bent itself out of shape to carefully avoid mentioning numbers in their judgment, in a case that is all about numbers!
Also notice they said nothing about meeting “the required constitutional geographical spread of votes”! Because they know the numbers make no sense - the man gave himself 2 times the registered number of voters in some places!
Then when INEC gave him certificate the next day, they carefully made sure NOT to release final tally of votes (because they know they’d be laughed at!)

How hard is it to obtain INEC documents, write any results u wish, keep the carbon copies, and destroy the rest??
Or is it that it is so hard to obtain INEC documents??
The ONLY way to checkmate that is to accept INEC’s word, UNDER OATH, that they never issued those documents!

I am not at all into politics at all, but here is what someone into Imo politics wrote:

Imo people did not vote for Hope. Hope didn't even campaign in Imo because of the APC crises between him and Rochas who was fronting his in-law, Uche Nwosu.

On the day of the election, Hope and some APC loyalists were lodged in a Hotel in Owerri writing results after INEC announced results. They brought the results and were compelling returning officer to announce but he refused that it was fake that even party reps have raised the alarm.

DesignPoint:


They want the God of bayelsa state to be their God.
Lol. It is well.

The two cases are very different.
Disqualifications, as in Bayelsa, are common in politics. In Imo nobody was disqualified, instead it is a case of the SC aiding and abetting clear fraud and rigging!

Also in Bayelsa SC upheld lower courts. Whereas in Imo they overruled all lower courts AND INEC to replace an 8-month gov with a FOURTH place finisher. All based on clearly fraudulent documents that were not only full of ridiculous figures that exceeded number of registered voters, they were also incomplete, smudgy, full of alterations, signed only by APC, and showed results for only APC and PDP out of 70 parties!
THE CASES ARE NOT EVEN COMPARABLE!!

thundafire:
It must be reviewed,and Lyon of Bayelsa don't have a case he should curse dey day he was allocated his deputy with numerous names

Jack500:
They should keep deceiving themselves, so in their myopic mind, they think APC will loose both Imo and Bayelsa.

APC should take Bayelsa and give imo back to PDP, imo is not consequential to APC victory in 2023, Bayelsa is far more important.

Of course the two cases are quite different. In fact the Imo case is quite different from all the other cases. Imo is the only case where Supreme Court actually aided and abetted fraud and rigging.

And I think it is quite intentional going by how the SC bent itself out of shape to carefully avoid mentioning numbers in their judgment, in a case that is all about numbers!
Also notice they said nothing about meeting “the required constitutional geographical spread of votes”! Because they know the numbers make no sense - the man gave himself 2 times the registered number of voters in some places!
Then when INEC gave him certificate the next day, they carefully made sure NOT to release final tally of votes (because they know they’d be laughed at!)

How hard is it to obtain INEC documents, write any results u wish, keep the carbon copies, and destroy the rest??
Or is it that it is so hard to obtain INEC documents??
The ONLY way to checkmate that is to accept INEC’s word, UNDER OATH, that they never issued those documents!

I am not at all into politics at all, but here is what someone into Imo politics wrote:

Imo people did not vote for Hope. Hope didn't even campaign in Imo because of the APC crises between him and Rochas who was fronting his in-law, Uche Nwosu.

On the day of the election, Hope and some APC loyalists were lodged in a Hotel in Owerri writing results after INEC announced results. They brought the results and were compelling returning officer to announce but he refused that it was fake that even party reps have raised the alarm.

Mikehot:
God gave man the freewill to make choice, think and make decisions and if he wanted to be overiding the choice of man because he has all powers then he would have made us like animals instead.

(BTW u misspelt “fraternity” in your signature)

Well, man IS an animal.
Where and how u were born and brought up and DNA and your type of brain determine your choices. Yet u have no say in any of those

Kingosytex:
Ned Nwoko's son should be the one marrying Regina and not Ned himself.

Regina's mother_Rita is still single, what stopped Ned from marrying her if he really needed to marry from Regina's family?

Ned + Rita = Balanced.
Ned + Regina = Unbalanced.
Ned's son + Regina = Balanced.

Real life proves u wrong
Ned+Rita = Divorce by now (most likely)
Ned’s son + Regina = Beat her, cheat on her
Ned + Regina = Surprisngly very balanced

Good old days huh

Na wa

greggng:
You don't know anything about how court operate. They are not father Xmas that will give you what u didn't ask for. The two cases are different . In imo apc result from a certain unit was excluded fraudulently ...pdp claimed the said result from those units where forged. The apex court now ask them to present evidence to prove that a result of a unit signed by Inec officials deployed to those units where fraud...but they had no answer to that question . The supreme court asked apc candidate to present the result of those units and they gladly presented it and Inec didn't deny it...The question a man with conscience should ask is ....why was those result excluded and for what reason? If you cannot answer this question then keep quiet and Bury your face in shame for aiding and abating fraud. The question about supreme court not counting the result to ascertain what each party got is irrelevant cos pdp never believed in the existence of that result...They can't benefit from their misfortune...Elementary school law student knows about it.

With all due respect sir, u r the one that should hide your face in shame. Just look at what u r arguing! Not only were the documents not signed as u claim, they were full of ridiculous figures that exceeded number of registered voters; they were also incomplete, smudgy, full of alterations, signed only by APC, and showed results for only APC and PDP out of 70 parties!

How is it Father Christmas to note the obvious fraudulent nature of documents right in front of you?!
Can’t u see that going by that, any party in power can then “win” any election they want, permanently removing your right to have a say in who governs u. That’s what u r defending!

How hard is it to obtain INEC documents, write any results u wish, keep the carbon copies, and destroy the rest??
Or is it that it is so hard to obtain INEC documents??
The ONLY way to checkmate that is to accept INEC’s word, UNDER OATH, that they never issued those documents!

U r right, the two cases are quite different. In fact the Imo case is quite different from all the other cases. Disqualification, as in Bayelsa, is quite common in politics. Imo is the only case where Supreme Court actually aided and abetted clear fraud and rigging.

Also in Bayelsa SC upheld lower courts. In Imo they overruled all lower courts AND INEC to replace an 8-month gov with a FOURTH place finisher, all based on clearly fraudulent documents.
THE CASES ARE NOT EVEN COMPARABLE!!

Notice how the SC bent itself out of shape to carefully avoid mentioning numbers in their judgment, in a case that is all about numbers!
Also notice they said nothing about meeting “the required constitutional geographical spread of votes”! Because they know the numbers make no sense - the man gave himself 2 times the registered number of voters in some places!
Then when INEC gave him certificate the next day, they carefully made sure NOT to release final tally of votes (because they know they’d be laughed at!)

edoairways:
From his comment, I suspect PDP was compensated with Bayelsa. If you know you know

PDP MUST NOT AGREE!!!
The two cases are very different!
Disqualification is common in politics per Bayelsa. In Imo nobody was disqualified instead it is a case of the SC aiding and abetting clear fraud and rigging!
Also in Bayelsa SC upheld lower courts. In Imo they overruled all lower courts AND INEC to replace an 8-month gov with a FOURTH place finisher.
THE CASES ARE NOT COMPARABLE!!

Wantedmiller:
my dear it has not gotten to insult ok......

argue like a man jooor

please who got the 99.9.%?

Oh ok. I thought u knew what was going on. Never mind. Forget the whole thing.
(But how can u possibly not know that Hope got twice the number of registered voters in some places, also getting 99.9% of the votes?!)

Wantedmiller:
So just because PDP won in his stronghold, are you indirectly saying APC should have won everything.

as far as it is all about Nigeria.........Election na Jege. Play your card and win.

Nothing like people's mandate........Sooner or later people will get use to the candidate.

Please stop talking nonsense. Someone got 99.9% of the votes with over 100% voter turnout and here u r debating it!

Using the precedent of this judgment , a ruling party can easily “win” any election, effectively removing any say u may have in choosing who rules you.
And that is what u r busy defending!

ThiagoKid:
Who do you think should come bak? Like for ihedioha, Share for Lyon FC

You (and the SC) are making it look like the two cases are comparable by lumping them together. They are not! Disqualification is common in politics per Bayelsa. In Imo nobody was disqualified instead it is a case of the SC aiding and abetting clear fraud and rigging

Wantedmiller:
So just because someone into imo politics wrote that......and you believed it.

Sentiment will not kill us......

Hope did not campaign.......says who....

Imo people did not vote for him......how come he got those votes.

It is not sentiments. Subsequent events bore him out: PDP just recently won a rerun in the same Hope “stronghold” where he got 99.9% of votes with over 100% voter turnouts!!

Dansuqi:
Imo goes back to pdp and bayelsa apc.quid pro quo

Nah. Disqualification is common in politics. In Imo nobody was disqualified instead clearly fraudulent documents and numbers were accepted!

Dansuqi:
Continue wasting your time.commonsense demands that with bayelsa lost from apc,you wony get IMO again

Did you even read the write-up?! The two cases are quite different. In fact the Imo case is quite different from all the other cases. Imo is the only case where Supreme Court actually aided and abetted fraud and rigging. And I think it is quite intentional and that the judgment was pre-determined. Kudos Racoon for the detailed explanation

.

backbone503:
And whats your take on the fact that the Apex court has imposed on the good people of Bayelsa state, a person they've found not worthy of being their governor?

The two cases are quite different. In fact the Imo case is quite different from all the other cases. Imo is the only case where Supreme Court actually aided and abetted fraud and rigging.

And I think it is quite intentional going by how the SC bent itself out of shape to carefully avoid mentioning numbers in their judgment, in a case that is all about numbers!
Also notice they said nothing about meeting “the required constitutional geographical spread of votes”! Because they know the numbers make no sense - the man gave himself 2 times the registered number of voters in some places!
Then when INEC gave him certificate the next day, they carefully made sure NOT to release final tally of votes (because they know they’d be laughed at!)

How hard is it to obtain INEC documents, write any results u wish, keep the carbon copies, and destroy the rest??
Or is it that it is so hard to obtain INEC documents??
The ONLY way to checkmate that is to accept INEC’s word, UNDER OATH, that they never issued those documents!

I am not at all into politics at all, but here is what someone into Imo politics wrote:

Imo people did not vote for Hope. Hope didn't even campaign in Imo because of the APC crises between him and Rochas who was fronting his in-law, Uche Nwosu.

On the day of the election, Hope and some APC loyalists were lodged in a Hotel in Owerri writing results after INEC announced results. They brought the results and were compelling returning officer to announce but he refused that it was fake that even party reps have raised the alarm.

Expensiverichyb:
Why the rush? No time to date and understand each other alittle abi? Alright
Congrats to them so long as they are happy.

Here is why they said they rushed:

You met in camp and already getting married, why did you not wait till after service year?

Muhammad: Time, they say, is of essence, and marriage is an institution ordained by God, who is the owner of our lives. I rely on this to hasten the marriage, instead of waiting for the end of our service year. I felt if I waited much longer than now, I might change my mind and start a fresh relationship with someone else who may not be right for me. So, I hastened the marriage because I felt it was an opportunity I could not afford to miss.

Racoon:
The supreme court judgement on Imo is a clear judicial miscarriage of justice.Imagine the valid votes massively exceeded the number of accredited voters.

It is actually more than that, the SC actually aided and abetted fraud and rigging.

And I think it is quite intentional going by how the SC bent itself out of shape in this case. They carefully avoided mentioning numbers in their judgment, in a case that is all about numbers!
Also notice they said nothing about meeting “the required constitutional geographical spread of votes”! Because they know the numbers make no sense - the man gave himself 2 times the registered number of voters in some places!
Then when INEC gave him certificate the next day, they carefully made sure NOT to release final tally of votes (because they know they’d be laughed at!)

How hard is it to obtain INEC documents, write any results u wish, keep the carbon copies, and destroy the rest??
Or is it that it is so hard to obtain INEC documents??
The ONLY way to checkmate that is to accept INEC’s word, UNDER OATH, that they never issued those documents!
I’m not at all into politics, but even I know the Imo state case is different from the rest.

FuckAllTheMODs:
I gt your point...

What I am saying is, the people like PDP as a party more than APC(it is not a news).
Again, they like Hope as a candidate more than Ihedioha. The thing is Hope found himself in a party where the people are skeptical about coupled with that Rochas and Nwosu bruhaha.

If both were to square up against each other under different parties from what we have, Ihedioha won't stand a chance against Hope.

I remember sometimes ago where a woman whose husband(a philanthropist) has been generous to his community contested in an election under APC, because of his husband, the community people decided to vote for her alone as gratitude to her husband but other APC contestants lost their elections.

***My political stories/analysis in this quote are all about Imo State politics.

Well the issue is not Ihedioha or Uzodinma. Who the hell r they! The issue is the SC and the fact that by this judgment they r setting a precedent that can take away
my say and that can turn the country into a one-party state. That’s why this Imo case is different from the rest