₦airaland Forum

Lie, she’s not behind anything

Officialgarri:
I learnt about the water and wine issue and Obasanjo in an interview almost admitted to it. (You can find the interview on YouTube) However, I haven't any proof as I haven't read or heard directly from W.S about staying away from water. But, it is a common knowledge that He is a lover of wine and has been inducted into various wine fraternities.

What he said was that wisdom came to him at a young age, unlike other people. The wisdom that came to him? That wine is better than water. So from a young age he drank wine not water!

.

BAZ001:
NCDC still giving outdated results.
But if Truly wearing of mask is preventing Covid 19 then 99% of lagosians should be infected by now. Because we all wear same mask for weeks and months, some keep it in their pockets or bag. Meaning we carry corona put inside pocket.
I just realized we ought to be disposing mask and wearing new ones, but na only 1 mask most people get.
The fact is that most people are more particular about picking up their life and businesses back, looking for how to make money or get job than avoiding corona virus. People no fear corona again.

HOW TIME HAS TOTALLY VINDICATED ME!!!
See below, what I posted way back in MARCH!!!!!

Nothing like a true icon living to a ripe old age!
HBD to a true legend!

But this shows it’s not from eating vegetables and avoiding danger and all that. WS didn’t do any of that. Infact I heard he didn’t drink water for ten years - only wine! The way he lived guaranteed he’d die young. Yet here we are!

** Two FTC back to back!
From now onwards I want to be known as Mr. FTC!!

wirinet:
You seem to have US complex. Most major innovations did not come from the US. Most scientific innovations actually started from Europe, ie Electricity, printing press, internal combustion engines, rocket technology, evolution, Germ theory, Astronomy, nuclear etc.

What the US does is steal manpower. They entice the best scientists (and those in other fields ) and then Americanise them and their innovations. Other typical very recent examples are Elon Musk and Hoan Ton-That.

Are those innovations of OUR TIME? I mean things like google, Apple, Facebook, u name it. But even the ones u mentioned ARE THEY SOCIALIST COUNTRIES??

OruExpress:
A lot of Nigerians have gotten into watching white supremacist US and American video about capitalism and socialism

*) Who would want to be a doctor? Why go through the stress of medical school and specialising in any field of medicine when you can just sit down at home and get equally paid? With this, the medical field will eventually collapse in a socialist state and hospitals would be nothing to write home about. Even if the socialists leaders are transparent enough to fund hospitals, no one would be willing to be a doctor. Why would many want to go through the stress of teaching, going to school, getting a masters or PhD when they can just sit down at home and get free stuffs. With this, the educational system will collapse. In fact no one would want to work except do the basic necessary things to survive.

*) Since people would stop working since they are getting free stuffs, who is going to generate money? What happens when everyone runs out on other people's money? You get poverty and starvation. The state might not even care since they own everything and are well to do so they may ignore the people's need and there's nothing the people can do about that. Even if they wanted to provide, who is willing to work? The lazy government or the lazy people? Even if the government forced people, will they risk a rebellion or will they get what they want given that the people have no skills?

*) As I have explained, the state has absolute power without checks and they are everyone's hope of survival hence the room to abuse human rights and oppression of the people with impunity.

Anybody knows what finally happened here?

PoliteActivist:
Bros VirginFinder stop being DISHONEST. You are a Christian. Stop pretending you can't read. That's why you were banned.
Did you even read the link provided? It says in bold letters that you are wrong.
It says clearly that the people you quoted were mistaken and shows why they were mistaken. And they have indeed since gone quiet because they now realise their mistake. GO AND READ THE LINK!
Here is what it says:
‎
And this:

My brother stop bothering yourself. He knew he lost long ago. His ban only prevented his further humiliation. But let him be: don’t hit a man while he is down.

prophetfire:
mamagee, its ur birthday? Ohh! The greatest birthday wish to the most beautiful n wonderful milf on nairaland. My lovely mamagee...!!

prophetfire:
mamagee, its ur birthday? Ohh! The greatest birthday wish to the most beautiful n wonderful milf on nairaland. My lovely mamagee...!! OiOi, Ifyalways, Amotolongbo, prop, dukeprince50

Lol, she just totally ignored u all

helinues:
If you made too much of unrealistic promises, people might not take you serious in the future....

Power of tongue...

WRONG! By “power of tongue” what they mean is what u say will come true. This, of course, is another nonsense superstition, otherwise people will be able to talk all sorts of things for themselves.

OiOi:
the tongue is indeed very powerful. That's why I pity people who swear on their life

How about all this time I’ve been saying I’m a billionaire instead of a mere millionaire and to date it still has not happened

Maureen2301:
Please anyone how has news on Deloitte abeg please what's the coordinate? house don tire this babe

Ok, first of all who or what is Deloitte?

iamyemiakins:
What's the rationale behind preparing for election where thousands of people would be expected to gather to cast their votes, but no same preparation is in action for our institutions of learning?

The students and lecturers are more than ready to accept and adhere to any measures that will be put in place by health bodies to avoid the spread of the virus among the students/lecturers respectively.

Tertiary institutions should be reopened now!!!

Too many older profs. How’d u protect them??

VirginFinder:
But in some cases you do. This is one of them.

No matter how much you think you know the law, you can NEVER represent yourself in court. You need a lawyer!

But that’s what u do not understand: WE ARE NOT IN COURT HERE! A case can go anyhow.

Our debate here is about what is WRITTEN ON THE BOOKS!!! Not about Lawyers or judges or intricacies. Fortunately for us what is written on the books is crystal clear!

VirginFinder:
What you call simple English is not that simple in the eyes of the law. That is why we need lawyers and judges.

You truly are a kid...

Bros, u don’t need any lawyer to know EXACTLY what 90% of laws say. “No left turn” is a law! Stop being obtuse!

VirginFinder:
It's a defilement only when there is no consent like it was in Yinusa's case.

Go and argue with our lawyers and judges.

You have the SIMPLE ENGLISH language of the law right in front of you. There is no big grammar. You are told to simply say what it says. Instead of being honest, u r running from this lawyer to that Judge and back!

VirginFinder:
How many times will I point you to section 7(2)

(2) A person who commits an offence of defilement with a child aged eleven years or less shall upon conviction be sentenced to imprisonment for life.

Lawyers and judges interpret the law. Their views over yours anytime anyday.

By the way, are you up to 30

Nobody can possibly be this slow! How can u partly quote a law when one part of a law can easily negate the other!
Ok, I’ll point u to this. It means defilement only applies between 12 and 15!

(3) A person who commits an offence of defilement with a child between the age of twelve and fifteen years is liable upon conviction to imprisonment for life.

VirginFinder:
Let's not digress. The law says a mad woman can't give consent. Chikena!

The same law says some children, 11 and above, can give consent. Chikena!

U have been severally asked to point to where the law says that. You can’t. Instead u keep running from this lawyer to that judge

VirginFinder:
That's another case entirely! A mad woman cannot give consent.

Why can’t she give consent?? Answer that question and you’ll see why a child can’t also give consent

VirginFinder:
If the girl is physically mature enough and has already started having sex prior to meeting the man...

He is afraid to say a number. So by your definition a mad woman is mature enough and has already been having sex

VirginFinder:
Sure I know enough based on overwhelming evidence from recent court judgments, activists, ageofconsent.net/world etc etc

Judges rule based on what is in the books...

You know it is categorical yet no one has ever gotten life as it “categorically” mandates!

There are laws on the books judges completely ignore

VirginFinder:
How dare you argue with our honourable judges, lawyers, activists and ageofconsent.net/world

We are not arguing with anyone. Our debate here is clear: what does it say on the books. Luckily what it says is very clear and unambiguous

VirginFinder:
I should have added age. It's just a proposal though. Nothing sacrosanct. The lawmakers can work on it and give us something good.

And what age would u propose is ok for a 50 year old to start having underage sex with a girl?

VirginFinder:
Go and tell that to our judges, lawyers, activists and ageofconsent.net

They have interpreted the law as professionals and without emotions.

I will look for Femi Falana's position on the law. He also faulted it for technically making the age of consent 11.

Why make provision for various age ranges instead of 18 alone 18 is the age of legal maturity in Nigeria. Once you are 18, you can be imprisoned. But you can marry even if you are not 18. You can have sex if you are not 18.

Listen, there are laws in the books that are never enforced. Our debate here is what it says in the books not what anybody said it says. Luckily what is says is
crystal clear where even an elementary school kid can say it.

So that’s why 18 is mentioned. Ok explain the below or forever keep shut:

(3) A person who commits an offence of defilement with a child between the age of twelve and fifteen years is liable upon conviction to imprisonment for life.

Virginfinder nice chatting witcha. Humbly collect your L on your way out. Try another. It’s not the end of the world.
YOU CANNOT WIN THIS BECAUSE SECTION 7 IS TOO CLEAR AND UNAMBIGUOUS. IF CONSENSUAL SEX WITH AN 18 YEAR OLD WERE LEGAL IT WOULD NOT BE MENTIONED JUST AS 23 IS NOT MENTIONED.

God speed, and once more don’t forget your L

PoliteActivist:
Actually the opposite is often the case. Many girls become lesbians, can't stand being penetrated

I can vouche for this. There are many girls who can’t stand normal sex because of exposure to early sex. Same with men by the way - early exposure turned them off sex with women

VirginFinder:
Of course, the child must be 11 and above to be able to give consent assuming she is no longer a virgin. We all know that once a child has been exposed too early, they often go wild and begin to yearn for it themselves.

That's why we must do all to protect our girls from getting exposed early so that they don't start having sexual urges like adults.

PREVENTION IS BETTER THAN CURE

Here is what u said. There is no age. The only provision u gave is that the girl must have been having sex:

But you must understand that some girls have become exposed at very early age. Some were defiled. Others just got inquisitive and decided to explore on their own with their male peers.
Such girls are no more innocent! They must be adjudged to be able to give consent.

PoliteActivist:
By the way you quoted me before I finished. Here's the rest of my post:
"Liable to" is in many laws. It means about the same as "shall". They are used interchangeably. Unless you find another line of argument, give it up. You have lost this one.
Below, I googled meaning of liable in law

I KNOW virginfinder knows he has lost the argument just that pride won’t let him humbly collect his L and gracefully bow out

wirinet:
Both systems have their strengths and weaknesses. The ideal system should be a harmonious blend of the two, which China and Europe is operating.

Untamed capitalism often lead to means of production being concentrated in few hands, leading to oligarchies, which in turn leads to huge disparity between the rich and poor. Such societies are eventually brought down by social tensions between the rich and poor. As the oligarchs get richer, the masses gets poor, until the poor masses revolts against the few rich elites.

A situation whereby 1% of the population controls 45% of a country's wealth, while the bottom 80% controls only 7% is unacceptable. That's a disaster waiting to happen.

Untamed socialism (communism ) is also as bad, if not worse than untamed capitalism. As all the factors of production is controlled by the state, the few elites controlling the state also form a sort of oligarchy and therefore control everything. They exploit and corrupt the system to their own advantage, while the masses suffer poverty and deprivation. Communism has the added flaw of inefficiencies in production and productivity.

All I know is that all the major innovations of our time are from capitalist countries (US especially, the bastion of capitalism). Anything from socialist countries is either copied or stolen from capitalists

Swissheart:
I was on that queue yesterday. The girl came before the guy but she was leaning on the wall. When it was her turn, she went to the machine. The guy said " if you move closer, I'll push you away" which he did. The girl fell then he went to the machine. He called her an idiot, the girl said " idiot ni eyin noo". The guy removed his slippers and slapped her with it. The girl screamed. That was why the slim girl and I confronted the guy.

That guy is an animal!

U r a real firebrand. Well done