₦airaland Forum

AWW SHUT UP JONA A MAJOJ PROBLEM WE HAVE WITH THIS ADMINISTRATION IS ONE NEPOTISM IN POLITICAL APPOINTMENTS AND 2 INSECURITY. LAST I CHECKED THE POWERS OF MILITARY AND LAW ENFORCEMENT RECIDED AT THE FEDERAL LEVEL ALSO THE PLACEMENT OF NOTHERNERS IN SENSITIVE POSITIONS WITHOUT CARRYING OTHER TRIBES ALONG SMELLS LIKE CONSPIRACY EVEN IF YOU WERE TO DO THAT ENSURE THAT COMPETENT INDIVIDUALS OCCUPY SHUCH POSITIONS.

Now let me give you a bit of a history lesson, do you know?

there's an ancient Macedonian phrase that's become a common principle in politics and power "divide et impera" known to us all as" divide and rule" it is the strategy in which rulers promote political division within the people of conquered nations so they'll begin fighting each other instead of imperial rule.


Israeli and Lebanon crisis came about when the British decided to bring both countries to share one land: Pakistan in 1947 and Israel in 1948 following the retreat of the British empire. Prior to that British was in control of the area after the fall of the ottoman empire in ww1 which was inhabited by a Jewish minority and arab majority.

in Nigeria north and southern protectorate was also amalgamated in 1914. unification was done for economic reasons as the north had a budget deficit and the colonial administration sought to use the budget surplus of the south to offset this deficit.

In India the India vs Pakistan conflict lied in their colonial past where from the 17th to the 20th century Britain ruled most of the Indian sub continent before the nationalist movement in India toppled the British rule. However, the Indian nation just like Nigeria & Israel was home to a vast array of religious and ethnic groups and to further discourage a unified India for independence the British reinforced divisions among religious lines similar to what you have in Nigeria and Israel. by 1947 when the British were ready to grant India independence, the seeds of discontent had been sown. The handover of power, and the resulting partition of India Pakistan created a conflict that would see both nations battle in an unending conflict just like Nigeria between the north and south and Israeli and Palestine.

In a nutshell, the problems and divisions among these countries India vs Pakistan Israel vs Lebanon and in Nigeria north vs south is all a British colonial construct aimed at ensuring an unending conflict within both nations or states not allowing the countries in question to unite and realise its full potential.

Now let me give you a bit of a history lesson, do you know?

there's an ancient Macedonian phrase that's become a common principle in politics and power "divide et impera" known to us all as" divide and rule" it is the strategy in which rulers promote political division within the people of conquered nations so they'll begin fighting each other instead of imperial rule.


Israeli and Lebanon crisis came about when the British decided to bring both countries to share one land: Pakistan in 1947 and Israel in 1948 following the retreat of the British empire. Prior to that British was in control of the area after the fall of the ottoman empire in ww1 which was inhabited by a Jewish minority and arab majority.

in Nigeria north and southern protectorate was also amalgamated in 1914. unification was done for economic reasons as the north had a budget deficit and the colonial administration sought to use the budget surplus of the south to offset this deficit.

In India the India vs Pakistan conflict lied in their colonial past where from the 17th to the 20th century Britain ruled most of the Indian sub continent before the nationalist movement in India toppled the British rule. However, the Indian nation just like Nigeria & Israel was home to a vast array of religious and ethnic groups and to further discourage a unified India for independence the British reinforced divisions among religious lines similar to what you have in Nigeria and Israel. by 1947 when the British were ready to grant India independence, the seeds of discontent had been sown. The handover of power, and the resulting partition of India Pakistan created a conflict that would see both nations battle in an unending conflict just like Nigeria between the north and south and Israeli and Palestine.

In a nutshell, the problems and divisions among these countries India vs Pakistan Israel vs Lebanon and in Nigeria north vs south is all a British colonial construct aimed at ensuring an unending conflict within both nations or states not allowing the countries in question to unite and realise its full potential.

THE ONLY REASON YOU SUPPORT ISREAL IS CAUSE OF CHRISTIANITY AND RELIGION.

gaius01:
Arrrrrrrh

Front page ? To create rancor abi?
I won't say much now, but one of this days I will sit down to cogitate on this conflict between Isreal, Hamas, Palestine, and the rest of the Muslim countries around it.

But come shine come win, I will support Isreal, no matter the causalities Hamas,Gaza will face. This not genocide it's a self defense war, note that !!

YOU HAVE ARRESTED NO ONE OGA STOP LYING TRYING TO GIVE YOURSELF A GOOD IMAGE

THEY HAVE SHARED IT AMONG THEMSELVES JUST DROP THE MATTER

CAUSE THATS ONE THING WITH FALSE PROPHETS THEY THEY USE RELIGION TO MISLEAD YOU AND GIVE YOU FALSE HOPE WHILE THEY SING ABOUT TAKING ADVANTAGE OF YOUR POCKETS AND MANIPULATING YOU TOWARDS SELF ENRICHING THEMSELVES

NIG GOVT PAY UP O THIS ONE NO BE ASSU STRIKE WHERE YOU GO DELAY FOR MONTHS UN END

NO BE YOU DEY FIND WHITNING CREAM TO MAKE YOU FAIR LIVE WITH YOUR DECISION ABEG AND STOP DISTURBING US

BUT HAVE YOU STABILIZED YOUR COUNTRY SOMETHING IS WRONG WITH THIS ENTITY OR CONTRUCT CALLED NIGERIA O

no we are not

Now let be give you a bit of history lesson do you know?

there's an ancient Macedonian phrase that's become a common principle in politics and power "divide et imperia" known to us all as" divide and rule" it is the strategy in which rulers promote political division within the people of conquered nations so they'll begin fighting each other instead of imperial rule.


Israeli and Lebanon crisis came about when the British decided to bring both countries to share one land Pakistan in 1947 and Israel in 1948 following the retreat of the British empire. prior to that British was in control of the area after the fall of the ottoman empire in ww1 which was inhabited by a Jewish minority and arab majority.

in Nigeria north and southern protectorate was also amalgamated in 1914. unification was done for economic reasons as the north had a budget deficit and the colonial administration sought to use the budget surplus of the south to offset this deficit.

in India the India vs Pakistan conflict lied in their colonial past where from the 17th to the 20th century Britain ruled most of the India sub continent before the nationalist movement in India toppled the British rule. however the Indian nation just like Nigeria & Israel was home to a vast array of religious and ethnic groups and to further discourage a unified India for independence the British reinforced divisions among religious lines similar to what you have in Nigeria and Israel. by 1947 when the British were ready to grant India independence, the seeds of discontent had been sown. the handover of power, and the resulting partition of India Pakistan created a conflict that would see both nations battel in an unending conflict just like Nigeria between the north and south and Israeli and Palestine.

in a nutshell the problems and divisions among these countries India vs Pakistan Israel vs Lebanon and in Nigeria north vs south is all a British colonial construct aimed at ensuring an unending conflict within both nations or state not allowing the countries in question to unite and realise its full potential.

Now let be give you a bit of history lesson do you know?

there's an ancient Macedonian phrase that's become a common principle in politics and power "divide et imperia" known to us all as" divide and rule" it is the strategy in which rulers promote political division within the people of conquered nations so they'll begin fighting each other instead of imperial rule.


Israeli and Lebanon crisis came about when the British decided to bring both countries to share one land Pakistan in 1947 and Israel in 1948 following the retreat of the British empire. prior to that British was in control of the area after the fall of the ottoman empire in ww1 which was inhabited by a Jewish minority and arab majority.

in Nigeria north and southern protectorate was also amalgamated in 1914. unification was done for economic reasons as the north had a budget deficit and the colonial administration sought to use the budget surplus of the south to offset this deficit.

in India the India vs Pakistan conflict lied in their colonial past where from the 17th to the 20th century Britain ruled most of the India sub continent before the nationalist movement in India toppled the British rule. however the Indian nation just like Nigeria & Israel was home to a vast array of religious and ethnic groups and to further discourage a unified India for independence the British reinforced divisions among religious lines similar to what you have in Nigeria and Israel. by 1947 when the British were ready to grant India independence, the seeds of discontent had been sown. the handover of power, and the resulting partition of India Pakistan created a conflict that would see both nations battel in an unending conflict just like Nigeria between the north and south and Israeli and Palestine.

in a nutshell the problems and divisions among these countries India vs Pakistan Israel vs Lebanon and in Nigeria north vs south is all a British colonial construct aimed at ensuring an unending conflict within both nations or state not allowing the countries in question to unite and realise its full potential.

NOW LET BE GIVE YOU A BIT OF HISTORY LESSON DO YOU KNOW?

THERES AN ACIENT MACEDONIAN PHRASE THATS BECOME A COMMON PRINCIPLE IN POLITICS AND POWER "DIVIDE ET IMPERA" KNOWN TO US ALL AS" DIVIDE AND RULE" IT IS THE STRATEGY IN WHICH RULERS PROMOTE POLITICAL DIVISION WITHIN THE PEOPLE OF CONQURED NATIONS SO THEY'LL BEGIN FIGHTING EACHOTHER INSTEAD OF IMPERIAL RULE.


ISREALI AND LEBANON CRISIS CAME ABOUT WHEN THE BRITISH DECIDED TO BRING BOTH COUNTRIES TO SHARE ONE LAND PAKISTAN IN 1947 AND ISREAL IN 1948 FOLLOWING THE RETREAT OF THE BRITISH EMPIRE. PRIOR TO THAT BRITISH WAS IN CONTROL OF THE AREA AFTER THE FALL OF THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE IN WW1 WHICH WAS INHABITED BY A JEWISH MINORITY AND ARAB MAJORITY.

IN NIGERIA NORTH AND SOUTHERN PROTECTORATE WAS ALSO ALMALGAMATED IN 1914. UNIFICATION WAS DONE FOR ECONOMIC REASONS AS THE NORTH HAD A BUDGET DEFICIT AND THE COLONIAL ADMINISTRATIO SOUGHT TO USE THE BUDGET SURPLUS OF THE SOUTH TO OFFSET THIS DEFICIT.

IN INDIA THE INDIA VS PAKISTAN CONFLICT LIED IN THEIR COLONIAL PAST WHERE FROM THE 17TH TO THE 20TH CENTURY BRITIAN RULED MOST OF THE INDIA SUB CONTINENT BEFORE THE NATIONALIST MOVEMENT IN INDIA TOPPLED THE BRITISH RULE. HOWEVER THE INDIAN NATION JUST LIKE NIGERIA & ISREAL WAS HOME TO A VAST ARRAY OF RELIGIOUS AND ETHNIC GROUPS AND TO FURTHER DISCOURAGE A UNIFIED INDIA FOR INDEPENDENCE THE BRITISH REINFORCED DIVISIONS AMONG RELIGIOUS LINES SIMILAR TO WHAT YOU HAVE IN NIGERIA AND ISREAL. BY 1947 WHEN THE BRITISH WERE READY TO GRANT INDIA INDEPENDENCE, THE SEEDS OD DISCONTENT HAD BEEN SOWN. THE HANDOVER OF POWER, AND THE RESULTING PARTITION OF INDIA PAKISTAN CREATED A CONFLICT THAT WOULD SEE BOTH NATIONS BATTEL IN AN UNENDING CONFLICT JUST LIKE NIGERIA BETWEEN THE NORTH AND SOUTH AND ISREALI AND PALESTINE.

IN A NUTSHELL, THE EPROBLEMS AND DIVISIONS AMONG THESE COUNTRIES INDIA VS PAKISTAN ISREAL VS LEBANON AND IN NIGERIA NORTH VS SOUTH IS ALL A BRITISH COLONIAL CONSTRUCT AIMED AT ENSURING AN UNENDING CONFLICT WITHIN BOTH NATIONS ORS STATE NOT ALLOWING THE COUNTRIES IN QUESTION TO UNITE AND REALISE ITS FULL POTENTIAL.

NOW LET BE GIVE YOU A BIT OF HISTORY LESSON DO YOU KNOW?

THERES AN ACIENT MACEDONIAN PHRASE THATS BECOME A COMMON PRINCIPLE IN POLITICS AND POWER "DIVIDE ET IMPERA" KNOWN TO US ALL AS" DIVIDE AND RULE" IT IS THE STRATEGY IN WHICH RULERS PROMOTE POLITICAL DIVISION WITHIN THE PEOPLE OF CONQURED NATIONS SO THEY'LL BEGIN FIGHTING EACHOTHER INSTEAD OF IMPERIAL RULE.


ISREALI AND LEBANON CRISIS CAME ABOUT WHEN THE BRITISH DECIDED TO BRING BOTH COUNTRIES TO SHARE ONE LAND PAKISTAN IN 1947 AND ISREAL IN 1948 FOLLOWING THE RETREAT OF THE BRITISH EMPIRE. PRIOR TO THAT BRITISH WAS IN CONTROL OF THE AREA AFTER THE FALL OF THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE IN WW1 WHICH WAS INHABITED BY A JEWISH MINORITY AND ARAB MAJORITY.

IN NIGERIA NORTH AND SOUTHERN PROTECTORATE WAS ALSO ALMALGAMATED IN 1914. UNIFICATION WAS DONE FOR ECONOMIC REASONS AS THE NORTH HAD A BUDGET DEFICIT AND THE COLONIAL ADMINISTRATIO SOUGHT TO USE THE BUDGET SURPLUS OF THE SOUTH TO OFFSET THIS DEFICIT.

IN INDIA THE INDIA VS PAKISTAN CONFLICT LIED IN THEIR COLONIAL PAST WHERE FROM THE 17TH TO THE 20TH CENTURY BRITIAN RULED MOST OF THE INDIA SUB CONTINENT BEFORE THE NATIONALIST MOVEMENT IN INDIA TOPPLED THE BRITISH RULE. HOWEVER THE INDIAN NATION JUST LIKE NIGERIA & ISREAL WAS HOME TO A VAST ARRAY OF RELIGIOUS AND ETHNIC GROUPS AND TO FURTHER DISCOURAGE A UNIFIED INDIA FOR INDEPENDENCE THE BRITISH REINFORCED DIVISIONS AMONG RELIGIOUS LINES SIMILAR TO WHAT YOU HAVE IN NIGERIA AND ISREAL. BY 1947 WHEN THE BRITISH WERE READY TO GRANT INDIA INDEPENDENCE, THE SEEDS OD DISCONTENT HAD BEEN SOWN. THE HANDOVER OF POWER, AND THE RESULTING PARTITION OF INDIA PAKISTAN CREATED A CONFLICT THAT WOULD SEE BOTH NATIONS BATTEL IN AN UNENDING CONFLICT JUST LIKE NIGERIA BETWEEN THE NORTH AND SOUTH AND ISREALI AND PALESTINE.

IN A NUTSHELL TH EPROBLEMS AND DIVISIONS AMONG THESE COUNTRIES INDIA VS PAKISTAN ISREAL VS LEBANON AND IN NIGERIA NORTH VS SOUTH IS ALL A BRITISH COLONIAL CONSTRUCT AIMED AT ENSURING AN UNENDING CONFLICT WITHIN BOTH NATIONS ORS STATE NOT ALLOWING THE COUNTRIES IN QUESTION TO UNITE AND REALISE ITS FULL POTENTIAL.

NOW LET BE GIVE YOU A BIT OF HISTORY LESSON DO YOU KNOW?

THERES AN ACIENT MACEDONIAN PHRASE THATS BECOME A COMMON PRINCIPLE IN POLITICS AND POWER "DIVIDE ET IMPERA" KNOWN TO US ALL AS" DIVIDE AND RULE" IT IS THE STRATEGY IN WHICH RULERS PROMOTE POLITICAL DIVISION WITHIN THE PEOPLE OF CONQURED NATIONS SO THEY'LL BEGIN FIGHTING EACHOTHER INSTEAD OF IMPERIAL RULE.


ISREALI AND LEBANON CRISIS CAME ABOUT WHEN THE BRITISH DECIDED TO BRING BOTH COUNTRIES TO SHARE ONE LAND PAKISTAN IN 1947 AND ISREAL IN 1948 FOLLOWING THE RETREAT OF THE BRITISH EMPIRE. PRIOR TO THAT BRITISH WAS IN CONTROL OF THE AREA AFTER THE FALL OF THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE IN WW1 WHICH WAS INHABITED BY A JEWISH MINORITY AND ARAB MAJORITY.

IN NIGERIA NORTH AND SOUTHERN PROTECTORATE WAS ALSO ALMALGAMATED IN 1914. UNIFICATION WAS DONE FOR ECONOMIC REASONS AS THE NORTH HAD A BUDGET DEFICIT AND THE COLONIAL ADMINISTRATIO SOUGHT TO USE THE BUDGET SURPLUS OF THE SOUTH TO OFFSET THIS DEFICIT.

IN INDIA THE INDIA VS PAKISTAN CONFLICT LIED IN THEIR COLONIAL PAST WHERE FROM THE 17TH TO THE 20TH CENTURY BRITIAN RULED MOST OF THE INDIA SUB CONTINENT BEFORE THE NATIONALIST MOVEMENT IN INDIA TOPPLED THE BRITISH RULE. HOWEVER THE INDIAN NATION JUST LIKE NIGERIA & ISREAL WAS HOME TO A VAST ARRAY OF RELIGIOUS AND ETHNIC GROUPS AND TO FURTHER DISCOURAGE A UNIFIED INDIA FOR INDEPENDENCE THE BRITISH REINFORCED DIVISIONS AMONG RELIGIOUS LINES SIMILAR TO WHAT YOU HAVE IN NIGERIA AND ISREAL. BY 1947 WHEN THE BRITISH WERE READY TO GRANT INDIA INDEPENDENCE, THE SEEDS OD DISCONTENT HAD BEEN SOWN. THE HANDOVER OF POWER, AND THE RESULTING PARTITION OF INDIA PAKISTAN CREATED A CONFLICT THAT WOULD SEE BOTH NATIONS BATTEL IN AN UNENDING CONFLICT JUST LIKE NIGERIA BETWEEN THE NORTH AND SOUTH AND ISREALI AND PALESTINE.

IN A NUTSHELL TH EPROBLEMS AND DIVISIONS AMONG THESE COUNTRIES INDIA VS PAKISTAN ISREAL VS LEBANON AND IN NIGERIA NORTH VS SOUTH IS ALL A BRITISH COLONIAL CONSTRUCT AIMED AT ENSURING AN UNENDING CONFLICT WITHIN BOTH NATIONS ORS STATE NOT ALLOWING THE COUNTRIES IN QUESTION TO UNITE AND REALISE ITS FULL POTENTIAL.

NOW LET BE GIVE YOU A BIT OF HISTORY LESSON DO YOU KNOW?

THERES AN ACIENT MACEDONIAN PHRASE THATS BECOME A COMMON PRINCIPLE IN POLITICS AND POWER "DIVIDE ET IMPERA" KNOWN TO US ALL AS" DIVIDE AND RULE" IT IS THE STRATEGY IN WHICH RULERS PROMOTE POLITICAL DIVISION WITHIN THE PEOPLE OF CONQURED NATIONS SO THEY'LL BEGIN FIGHTING EACHOTHER INSTEAD OF IMPERIAL RULE.


ISREALI AND LEBANON CRISIS CAME ABOUT WHEN THE BRITISH DECIDED TO BRING BOTH COUNTRIES TO SHARE ONE LAND PAKISTAN IN 1947 AND ISREAL IN 1948 FOLLOWING THE RETREAT OF THE BRITISH EMPIRE. PRIOR TO THAT BRITISH WAS IN CONTROL OF THE AREA AFTER THE FALL OF THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE IN WW1 WHICH WAS INHABITED BY A JEWISH MINORITY AND ARAB MAJORITY.

IN NIGERIA NORTH AND SOUTHERN PROTECTORATE WAS ALSO ALMALGAMATED IN 1914. UNIFICATION WAS DONE FOR ECONOMIC REASONS AS THE NORTH HAD A BUDGET DEFICIT AND THE COLONIAL ADMINISTRATIO SOUGHT TO USE THE BUDGET SURPLUS OF THE SOUTH TO OFFSET THIS DEFICIT.

IN INDIA THE INDIA VS PAKISTAN CONFLICT LIED IN THEIR COLONIAL PAST WHERE FROM THE 17TH TO THE 20TH CENTURY BRITIAN RULED MOST OF THE INDIA SUB CONTINENT BEFORE THE NATIONALIST MOVEMENT IN INDIA TOPPLED THE BRITISH RULE. HOWEVER THE INDIAN NATION JUST LIKE NIGERIA & ISREAL WAS HOME TO A VAST ARRAY OF RELIGIOUS AND ETHNIC GROUPS AND TO FURTHER DISCOURAGE A UNIFIED INDIA FOR INDEPENDENCE THE BRITISH REINFORCED DIVISIONS AMONG RELIGIOUS LINES SIMILAR TO WHAT YOU HAVE IN NIGERIA AND ISREAL. BY 1947 WHEN THE BRITISH WERE READY TO GRANT INDIA INDEPENDENCE, THE SEEDS OD DISCONTENT HAD BEEN SOWN. THE HANDOVER OF POWER, AND THE RESULTING PARTITION OF INDIA PAKISTAN CREATED A CONFLICT THAT WOULD SEE BOTH NATIONS BATTEL IN AN UNENDING CONFLICT JUST LIKE NIGERIA BETWEEN THE NORTH AND SOUTH AND ISREALI AND PALESTINE.

IN A NUTSHELL TH EPROBLEMS AND DIVISIONS AMONG THESE COUNTRIES INDIA VS PAKISTAN ISREAL VS LEBANON AND IN NIGERIA NORTH VS SOUTH IS ALL A BRITISH COLONIAL CONSTRUCT AIMED AT ENSURING AN UNENDING CONFLICT WITHIN BOTH NATIONS ORS STATE NOT ALLOWING THE COUNTRIES IN QUESTION TO UNITE AND REALISE ITS FULL POTENTIAL.

NIGERIA IS A FAILED CONSTRUCT ARE YOU GUYS STILL DOUBTING THIS?

MY FELLOW PEOPLE CONGRATULATIONS ON BECOMING THE FULANI CALIPHATE OF OF GREAT WEST AFRICA

TONTO YOU ARE A FRAUD WE KNOW YOU ARNT GONNA FEED 500 TALK LESS OF 2K KIDS YOU STAGE ALL THIS ACTS JUST TO POTRAY YOU AS A HUMANITATIAN SO YOU CAN KEEP WINNING AWARDS APPOINTMENTS AND ENDORSEMENTS...…THE SAD THUTH IS JUST LIKE THE AVERAGE NIGERIAN POLITICIAN YOU TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE MASSES TO GET TO THE TOP JUST THAT YOU ARE EVEN WORSE AS YOU USE VUNERABLE HUNGRY KIDS TO ATTAIN YOUR GOAL.

NICE ONE OUR SUPREME COURT GOV THIS IS A TIME OF CELEBRATION. BUT COME NEXT WEEK WHEN THE HOLIDAY IS OVER YOU WOULD BE BACK TO FACING THE REAL PROBLEMS YOU HAVE BACK HOME SO ALL THIS NAA WASH WE KNOW BEHIND ALL THE GLITS AND GLAMOUR YOU HAVE DEMONS TORMENTING U

BUHARI IN ASO ROCK IS NOT NIGERIAN

We are better prepared than any ethnic nationality. So we are ready, let them divide the country, let us die, we that don’t have the oil.” if you actually read meaning to this they might mean they are better prepared it terms of warfare rather than self independence.

NIGERIA

THE DAY THIS COUNTRY IS FINALLY DESTOYED NON OF THESE SO CALLED LEADERS WOULD ESCAPE THE PEOPLES JUDGEMENT FOR NOW LET THEM CONTINUE TO LOOT THE COUNTRY DRY AS A MATTER OF FACT I WOULD WANT PDP OR ANY OTHER PARTY SO THEY TOO CAN GO AFTER APC FOR ITS ATROCITIES AND CORRUPTION

SUCIDE IS NEVER AN OPTION ONLY COWARDS DO THAT LIKE THE SAYING GOES WHEN LIFE THROWS YOU A LEMON MAKE LEMONADE. WE SHOULD ALWAYS LEARN HOW TO TOUGHEN UP AND GET READY FOR ANY DIFFICULTY LIFE THROWS AT US

AWW I SEE THE NORTHERN RULING CLASS HAS GOTTEN TO YOU THEY HAVE PROBABLY BROUGHT UP YOUR OWN EFCC FILE ON ALL YOUR CORRUPTION AS GOV OF RIVERS STATE AND MADE YOU DROP ALL YOUR CHARGES LIKE THEY SAY HE WITH EQUITY MUST COME WITH CLEAN HANDS MR AMACHI YOUR HANDS ARE VERY DIRTY AND FILTHY WITH CORRUPTION

I AM BEGINNING TO SEE WHY KANU CALLED NIGERIA A ZOO WHY ARE OUR LEADERS EVIL TO US EHEN?

ABI O WITH ALL YOUR BEAUTIFUL PICTURES
DO HOMES HAVE STABLE ELECTRICITY = NO
DO HOME HAVE STABLE WATER = NO
DO HOMES HAVE GOOD SECURITY = NO
DO HOUSEHOLDS HAVE GOOD HEALTH CARE = NO
IS THERE EMPLOYMENT OPPOURTUNITIES FOR EBONYI GRADUATES = NO
SO TELL ME HOW ON EARTH DOES PICTURES PROVE EBONYI IS ETHOPIA MOREOVA WE ALL KNOW THERE ARE MORE BAD ROADS THAN GOOD ONES IN ALL STATES IN NIGERIA

Revere27:
Bro forget all this pictures stuff.

There is no state in Nigeria now that can't produce good and beautiful pictures as this and better off sef.

The question is how is the state of living of the people residing in the state?, what's the standard of living of the people?

Recently, they have been in the news for some destruction of properties and the likes.
Security is now something to check into

These and many others are what we need to look into in a state and not start sharing pictures up and down.. Before you know now, Ondo would bring out their own pictures, Kebbi would also bring their own too.
To what end??

Let's grow pass this pictures of a thing.

Peace!

DO YOU KNOW THE FG IS A CLOUT CHASER WHO ARE YOU TO TELL OTHER NATIONS TO DE SCALATE WHEN THERE ARE GROUPS LIKE ESN BANDITS AND BOKOHARAM RAVAGIBG YOUR COUNTRY HOW MANY CORRESPONDENCE HAVE YOU SENT TO THEM TO DE ESCALATE? THESE PEOPLE GOVERNING NIGERIA ARE JOKERS AND HAVE NO IOTA OF SHAME LIKE YOUR HOUSE IS ON FIRE AND YOU ARE USING YOUR LAST BUCKET OF WATTER TO QUENCH ANOTHER PERSONS PROBLEMS. ONE THING IS FOR SURE THE CURRENT CROP OF LEADERS NO SEND NIGERIA OR ITS PEOPLE

where in Lagos is developed? oga ordinary water household's in Lagos don't have individuals have to dig boreholes provide their own water provide their own security run on generators 24/7, slums everywhere even roads how many can you boast of? how many affordable mortgage housing schemes can the average Nigerian on minimum wage afford and you call that development don't make me laugh you probably haven't left the shores of Nigeria to know what a developed city actually looks like or what it means for a government to working and functional to its citizens. You can try to glorify your shithole mega city to the average Nigerian but not to people like me who have been to and live in more organised and functional societies.

iammo:
Bad chicken lays bad eggs , bad society brings forth bad Politicians,

So do you suggest Nigeria becomes leaderless because to you and your types you are better than Tinubu who fought for Democracy, and developed Lagos in his own capacity?!

ALL POLITICIANS IN NIGERIA ARE THE SAME I HAVE NON ON MY LIST WHO I CAN BOAST OF GOOD CREDENTIALS

iammo:
Why are you scared to mention just a name ?!

Let's compare and contrast