Clevite's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Clevite's Profile › Clevite's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 (of 19 pages)
seunayantokun:The status of Jadda people indeed changed by becoming Nigerian citizens after the plebiscite but not Nigerian citizens by birth. This is however limited to as many of them that had been born by parents of Jadda origin before the plebiscite. This is the category Atiku falls into. Those of them that were born after the plebiscite are and remain full Nigerian citizens by birth. According to Nigeria Constitution of 1999, Atiku does not fall in this category. In summary, according to 1999 Nigeria Constitution, Atiku is a Nigerian citizen but not by birth. |
GoodGovernance:The Petitioner doesn't have to prove his case beyond reasonable doubt. This is a civil, not a criminal, case. All the Petitioner needs is to prove his case by preponderance of evidence. I agree with you anyway that a Respondent needs not necessarily call a witness in a badly presented case. |
Abasey:Many are quick to hear but sluggish to absorb! |
Raydos:God will always shame enemies of Nigeria like you ![]() |
We just have to be careful of these refrees! |
Please we need one more goal before 45mns |
Gooooooaaaal |
To make an easy win for us today, the best for Super Eagles is to put at least a goal in Bafana's net within the first 10 mns. Any thing other than that makes them more and more bold. |
Xisnin:You have never read a story where worshippers defend an Imam against a criminal act. But you must have read or seen where worshippers defend 'the Prophet' against a critical analysis to the point of killing others. Right?! |
joseph1832:Please, tell me that particular history that was not on Madagascar's side. As far as African football is concerned, Madagascar has nothing we can yet refer to as their past. They are just beginning to write their own history. Have they played Nigeria or any nation before that we can refer to, except in this tournament? |
alexvatt:As for Cameron; yes, history was on our side. But for Madagascar, there wasn't any history to refer to about them. They are just beginning to write history. |
IneedSugarMumy1:Choice of court depends on the court under which jurisdiction the shop at which the offence was committed is located. May be the shop falls within the jurisdiction of Zuba Magistrate court. |
IMASTEX:It is on another thread where Police Spokesperson has debunked the story that the Senator and the IG met today. The meeting was said to be in Kaduna, inside Governor El-Rufai's office during a Security Summit in April earlier this year. And if you look at that environment very well, it shows there is a portrait located behind the Senator and the IG, showing Governor El-Rufai's picture. |
Bellotelli:With due respect, you are not correct. It is absolutely a criminal offence. Nothing civil there at all. A person physically manhandling another person is an offence. In Criminal Law, it is called assault and battery. Where such physical act results in injury or harm, it is categorised as Assault Occasioning Grievous Bodily Harm. Infact, the offender can even be charged for Attempted Murder, depending upon the degree of injury. And for your information, he had committed the offence as at the time, according to his own side of the story. He said the incident occurred sometime in March. |
MetaPhysical:I doubt if you ever read the post before you jumped into making this comment. Perhaps, it is in your bid to be first to comment or make the first page. If none of these is the case, then this comment of yours casts a serious doubt on your reasoning capability or comprehensive capacity. The press release says the meeting between the IG took place in April long before the man's nefarious act became a public knowledge. The video was released on July 2. The online medium that released the video reported that the incident took place on May 11. The man himself claims that it happened in March. From both claims, it is obvious that the Police IG and members of the public(including you) had got no knowledge of the Senator's criminal act as at the time he and the IG met. And it was even a contact that took place in another person's office during a public event. How the idea came to you that the IG was meeting with a "criminal citizen" he hadn't known had ever committed any infraction of the law as at the time they met is baffling to a reasonable mind. You even went ahead to state that the IG "allows a criminal access into his immediate environment" when the report says that the contact took place inside Kaduna State Governor's office! Which immediate environment?! This is a serious gaffe on your part. When you want to criticize, please learn to do reasonably and constructively based upon informed ground. Anything other than that, you will always end up goofing and off-point as you have done here. |
Why don't you wait for her till she surfaces in court, if the mater eventually gets there? Her staying away from public glare should not be an issue for anyone and it shouldn't be a matter to insinuate any suspicion about. |
Come see Joseph Yobo here o, boasting that Omeruo was able to score that kind of Goal because the guy had played along side with him. Yobo is taking pride in Kenneth Omeruo's performance o. |
And Omeruo hits the net!!!!! |
And the Omeruo hits the net!!!!! |
GistFullGround: |
tuniski:NO, my friend, no where from this clear provision is any thing "60 days upon appeal" is stated. Be calm and read again, the Constitution states "An appeal ... shall be heard and disposed of within 60 days FROM THE DATE OF THE DELIVERY OF JUDGEMENT OF ...THE COURT OF APPEAL." In other words, 60 days start counting from the date Court of Appeal delivers it's Judgment. NO WHERE from this Constitutional provision is it stated that 60 days start counting from the date a party files his appeal but from the date the judgement to be appealed is delivered. I think what you are misconstruing is the difference between the time appeal lies and when the appeal is filed. Electoral Act mandates a party willing to appeal to file the appeal within 21 days from the date the court delivers its judgment. |
tuniski:Are you still arguing against this clear provision of the Constitution, my dear Brother?! Which one is more straightforward in this matter now; the Constitution or your own unfounded opinion? You don't argue with an explicitly stated provision of the law or Constitution. You can only do this when you have a statutory provision stating anything to the contrary. And I have asked you to provide me with one. Please back up your assertion with law. |
tuniski:tuniski, it is obvious you're the one that needs to get yourself updated here. To make it easy for you, I refer you to the Constitution by which the Supreme Court is guided. Please go and read Section 285(7) of 1999 Constitution(as amended). It states thus: "An appeal from the decision of an election tribunal or Court of Appeal in an election matter shall be heard and disposed of within 60 days FROM THE DATE OF THE DELIVERY OF JUDGEMENT OF THE TRIBUNAL OR COURT OF APPEAL." ( emphasis mine) Kindly give me any statutory provision contrary to this. I'm waiting. |
OP, this kind of analysis was spread around by people like you the day the Court of Appeal hearing was done. All kind of insinuations stating that APC lawyers were disgraced, that Oyetola had a bad day, PDP lawyers had a good day and so on. But at the end of the day, the same Appeal Court gave a resounding judgment of in the ratio of 4 to 1 against the same PDP and Adeleke. I hope you will not come back here on July 5th shouting miscarriage of justice, if the Supreme Court judgment do not go the way of your insinuations. Why don't you fold your arms and wait till the Court decides either way on July 5th instead of these infantile presumtions you're making? |
tuniski:The 60 days don't count from the date appeal was filed but from the date Court of Appeal judgment was delivered. |
tuniski:Supreme Court has till on or before July 8 deadline to deliver judgement. They have 60 days from the day of Appeal Court judgment to deliver their own judgment. Court of Appeal gave their judgment on May 9, 2019. So, July 5 date is still within time. |
Instead of the elecctoral fraud pepertrated by this criminals power, the appeal court based its judgement on composition of the tribunal. What a shame.[/quote]There were 12 issues decided upon in the judgement, the issue of composition of the Tribunal was just one of them. Out of the 12 issues , 10 were resolved in favour of APC/Oyetola by 4 of the 5 members of the Appeal Panel. |
Jman06:When the Tribunal majority gave it to APC, the judiciary was a tool in the hands of PDP, abi? |
Hedonini:Is the Supreme Court no longer in APC and Buhari's pocket as your likes do say? Is it no longer the reason why Onnoghen was removed and Muhammed Tanko was 'put' there or don't you believe it ? |
Asides our boys being wasteful, the Angolan defence have been rock-solid in this match. They have deflated many of our scoring moves. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 (of 19 pages)
