₦airaland Forum

Ibime: The stats dont lie as the graph shows . . . meanwhile, I have never claimed that Chelsea has a defensive midfielder worthy of the name. . . cos we dont have one. . . all I know is that Mikel presides over the most disastrous defensive performances.

that's a very untrue statement!
the stats of mikel you are bringing up also coincided with di matteo's era this season when chelsea had lost their bearing. with daft tactical approach and idiotic team selection/formation, it was no surprise that the italian got the sack. rafa benitez have been far pragmatic with his approach and mikel has been injured/banned for a while - which renders your statistics null and void!

The Lamps/Ramires partnership conceded 7 goals in 16 games, whilst Romeu kept 3 clean sheets in 4 games he played even against City, whilst Luiz/Lamps conceded less than a goal a game. . . but last time I checked, Chelsea had conceded close to 30 goals in less than 20 games Mikel played in. . .

mikel is heads and shoulders better than romeu!
the stats last season alone suggests romeu is a witless apprentice to mikel. mikel is the better passer, better tackler and he also reads the game better than romeu.

romeu
https://www.eplindex.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/Romeu-12.png

mikel
https://www.eplindex.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/John-Obi-Mikel-201.png

Ibime: Sure. . . like West Ham game where Diame did a Burkina Faso on him allowing West Ham to pop 3 goals ontop his head. . .

like lampard wasn't on the pitch when ordinary southampton destroyed chelsea's midfield at the bridge. when chelsea concede with mikel on the pitch, then mikel is automatically the fault. when chelsea concede without mikel then ibime quickly blames luiz or torres. lampard has never been at fault - you are a disgrace with your tunnelvision analysis!

Ibime: They had man advantage, hence Mikel and his midfielders were in advance of halfway line in 94th minute?

you claimed to have been watching the premier league since 1997. what have you learnt about teams defending deep for long spells?

As usual Mikel is absolved by his sheer ABSENCE while defenders are left in one-on-one situations to cop the blame. . . as Mikel jogs slowly behind the play. . . never in the picture to be blamed.

four defenders can stop 4 attackers.....
it's not about the number of men, it's about positioning. i once saw phil jones defend against 2 strikers for man utd.......and he averted the danger quite smartly. the cross from the burkinababe player wasn't even a good one.

yobo and the other covering defender missed a simple low driven cross to the box. at least one of them should be tactically aware of what was behind them. there was no danger close to enyeama - the danger was behind them and the man with the ball couldn't have scored from his position. simply put, yobo for all his experience was ball-watching!

Yes, I blame Yobo. . . . not for losing a one-on-one situation. . . but as captain for not dragging his team deep to shut out the game. . . and Mikel as the most experienced midfielder and midfield leader for allowing 4 men to drop 20 yards inbetween his midfield and the defence.
MOPOL midfielder!

that's a big lie ------
mikel obi has no fault in the goal we conceded. the centre-halves were actually out of position and it's because they were trying to recover that they both missed the simple pass into the box.

Any Chelsea midfield combination involving Mikel is a pure disaster. Mikel the only man sure to be there when Chelsea concedes more than 1.5 goals per game.

you are a tool!
i have told you times without number that these stats are meaningless if we don't know the kind of opposition chelsea faced when lampard featured in comparison to when mikel featured.

for instance, if mikel featured in tough away games and lampard featured in the home games against bottom teams - then logic dictates chelsea would concede more away than when they are at home.

mikel is chelsea's best hatchet man - quote me anyday!!!

bigheart2013: Here are the questions again:
1.Should Nigerian states have laws to protect single parents, and girls who have babies out of wedluck, such that such kids must have right of inheritance to their ‘father’s wealth/property same as the man’s other kids from a marriage to encourage women who wish and choose to be single parents?

no - the law cannot be enforced....
women should learn to guide their treasures and in the most desperate situation, they should cultivate the condom habit!

2. Should Nigerian men who get unmarried girls pregnant be forced to provide them support/ maintenance through the pregnancy period, and financial support (including housing) for the baby to discourage the high level or illegal abortions in Nigeria?

not applicable as well as there are 40 million unemployed youths in the country. you cannot force an unemployed man to pay or support a pregnant woman. once again, the orientation should rather focus on the morality. prevention is better than cure!

3. Where a wife does not violently object (like in most Muslim households, and among traditionalist men, or even Christians who may see nothing wrong with it), should a man marry a second or third wife as long as those wives are legal? This can be achieved by allowing customary courts or traditional rulers issue marriage certificates if a man can present proof of dowry payment and the lady’s parental consent, so that those who can’t wed in churches because of doctrines of monogamy can still legally marry women they love than cheat and keep them as mistresses.

polygamy is the only effective way of helping the leftovers but then it puts the pressure back on the first wives. a once happy home would become broken and this degenerates and the society would have to bear the brunt of the menace from broken homes. it's a lose-lose situation. things should be left the way they are unless the government can provide welfare for all and sundry like most advanced countries!

Ibime: I couldn't care less if Fegor Ogude or any of those nonentities were playing like headless chickens in 94th minute. None of those animals play for my club.

I still don't understand. Please someone explain to me. How do 4 men run at 4 defenders in 94th minute whilst defensive midfielders are jogging on halfway line by way of defending one goal lead. I would soon show ya'll what am talking about.

someone tell this phat phool nigeria were a man down and burkina took maximum advantage of the situation. the fault lies with yobo and the other defender who should be picking up the second ball. the 2 of them should be faulted for the goal.

Ibime: How come 4 men are running at 4 defenders in 94th minute?

this is playstation - mikel controls the other players from his position. he's at fault when they lose the ball or when they pass it to each other. mikel holds the game-pad, he even gets to do the substitutions. mikel is a demigod!

Ibime: Mikel once again escorting Burkina Faso midfield to the goal. Which kain defensive midfielder be this. How can a team in the lead be caught on counterattack in 94th minute?

you want to blame mikel for the calamity defending from yobo and the dude wearing 14 shirt? cheiiiiii - you should bag a degree in witchhunting! mikel was the best player on the pitch by a country mile!

mikel obi has been absolute class in this game.


efe ambrose just got a red card - another keita?

jidegirl12: Yup! You just got it!

o..........k, shyte just got real!

beautiful flick from ideye....:that's a world class touch
i like strikers who understand each other.

jidegirl12: Lol cooger you don start again .... How many over 30 single 'financially buoyant' women to do have in Nigeria alone?

if they are not financially buoyant - why make children? you mean the poster is looking for ways to support unmarried women who want children? this is indirect pröstitution!

bboiabb: mikel's passing is on point abeg!! ALL his long and short passing has been so good!!

he's the only stand-out performer on the pitch
the others are just running around like kids playing the principal cup in ogun state. luba secondary school vs ijebu ode grammar school.

mukina2: we did CIV!!!!
goo burkina faso!!!

civ? na lie.
you are not from abidjan - you are from mogadishu!

dayokanu: So Nigeria still get National team

you should see their football shirt - the best nigerian jersey since slavery was abolished!

mukina2: heheheheheh Burkina Faso!!!

comot for here, your country did not qualify.

jidegirl12: We know... OP is talking bout support for these women. A kind of law that obligates paternal fathers to care for these children and be involved .

Right Bigheart?

support?
these women don't need support - they are finacially buoyant enough to support the child. inheritance is out of it from the spërm donor. why would a child raised outside wedlock get the same privileges as the legitimate child?

western civilisation caused this scarcity of men. some 30-50 yrs ago, most men were polygamists. all those single women languishing away in churches waiting for a dream husband would be 4th/5th wives of some rich men. it's different in the 21st century as the modern christian and the 21st century have criminalised polygamy.

keshi didn't start victor moses? is this fat fool crazy or what?
feck me.....to think i left work early to be greeted by this shower of shyte team selection. i think i need to go n drink......

bigheart2013: If an unmarried lady wants a baby, and can’t find a husband; she’s approaching menopause and desperate, what practical solutions does she have?

don't get left behind...
if an unmarried woman wants her baby then there are spërm banks everywhere - get inseminated and live your life to the fullest. you even get to choose how you want your baby to look(designer baby). the higher you pay the better the quality of your offspring.

mithel: OGA WE DON HEAR TORRES IS THE BEST IN THE WORLD, CAN YOU FUC* OFF NOW

its nauseating seeing your comments

why don't you go fück yourself? was i talking to you? if you want attention, go smoke some more of your public hair, you miserable onanist!

pyramid777: I recently got married to my wife and we are getting to know each other well... But my major challenge with her is her inability to be time conscious doing "women stuff", i used to be a very organized and prompt person at occassions & church services but ever since i got married i find myself arriving late at occassions due to my wife's delays.

I tried some techniques like making sure she takes her bath on time & before me, reducing our expected time of arrival eg telling her 8am when the events actually starts by 9am...but havent made much progress.

I humbly requests for advice / tips from the married men in the house on how i can ensure i carry my wife along and attend functions/church services at the correct time without a quarrel.

unfortunately, you cannot do anything about this.
i am certain there's a certain strand in a woman's DNA that prevents her from being time conscious. women would always take the piss with time. your wife is perfectly normal - ask your colleagues what they are going through as well, you would be pleasantly surprised is the same everywhere. the only way to it is getting prepared far earlier than schedule. if you want to get to a social function by 4pm, start preparing by 10am.

El Guapo: [color=#0066ff]If the Goalie could read the Situation and Snuff out the Danger then how much more the attacker putting a Finishing touch to a Sojourn to Goal he already started other than keep running Like a tail on fire Rat -- After 'em go start to dey Compare Torres with Falcao SMH[/color]

this point is rëtarded.....the goalkeeper or the defender has the advantage - all they just need to do is put their bodies in the way of a shot. the striker must be precise and accuarate to score the goal.

torres was under enormous pressure from the covering defender and he still had a goalie to beat. it would have been an easy catch for szczesny had torres hit the shot from outside the box. whichever way you look at it, that was a brilliant piece of goalkeeping by szczesny!

i actually thought arsenal played well on sunday.....they got robbed by a useless match official(martin atkinson). chelsea have not lost a single game in the premier league in which atkinson has reffed. the ramirez tackle on coquelin was the turning point in the game - arsenal lost the initiative after that incident and it took them a long while to recover from the upset!

in the second half, arsenal completely pulverised chelsea's overhyped midfield. if they had van persie, they would have beaten chelsea in the second half. cazorla simply ate lampard/ramirez for lunch......giroud is not top tier and walcott couldn't do it all by himself. arsenal need a david villa/huntelaar to finish the chances they create.

somehow, the women on this forum have managed to deflect the blame from the serial killer to the husband - this is just pathetic. a woman murdered 4 children and somehow the man is the one to blame? what is wrong with you people with your uncanny ability to never call a spade what it is?

freecocoa: I'd tell the holy spirit that its not that I want to disobey him but he should help me tell my hubby by himself cos my hubby will understand better if it came directly from the holy spirit.

On a more serious note, I don't think the holy spirit would like the drama that will definitely follow the confession if my husband happens to be my present man, so make we just leave matter

the number of people the Holy Spirit speaks to in nigeria is not up to 12. why do some people deceive themselves about spirit this and that. human's conscience has 2 parts - the good side and the evil side......it depends on which one the brain decides to follow. Holy Spirit and nigerians shouldn't be in the same sentence.

denzel2009: come on coogar speak for yourself...

i don't speak to exes - i delete every link to them the moment the relationship is off(sometimes even before the relationship is off). i don't have time for such frivolities....she's an ex for a reason! seeking out one's old flame is the beginning of joblessness.

dayokanu: How can a striker have a free 40yard run on goal and still fail to take a shot? Thats the stuff you expect from Dombraye and Ikedia

are you blind to see torres was tracked by metresacker all the way? he was under pressure till szczesny scooped the ball. compare that to ba's solo run into the box and taking a tame shot....

Demba Ba 3 starts 3 goals. Tells the who story
Torres 21 league starts 7 goals

it's so obvious ba has failed the moment dayo started using "starts" instead of minutes to analyse ba's stats. what won't these deluded anti-torres crew use as an excuse?

in comparison....
demba ba - 1 goal in 170 league mins
sturridge - 2 goals in 113 league mins

none of us here believes sturridge is better than ba but the stats say it differently. is chelsea the fault or torres? numbers don't lie......strikers are shyte at chelsea but they excel elsewhere.

dayokanu: That is tagged headless chicken run, The stuff you expect from Pius Ikedia not a 50m striker. Imagine running like he is aiming for a touchdown.

when torres runs, they blame him he makes headless chicken runs. when he doesn't they say he's finished and he has no pace. torres was absolutely magnificent today. he made good runs, worked the channel and he was the only threat left in the 2nd half when MAZACAR disappeared. MAZACAR have to be the laziest trio in the history of english league. pretty when in possession, useless without the ball.

denzel2009: It takes a new level of maturity to stay friends with your ex..I still have some as friends,

only because you still want to sleep with them.
it's not just possible to be friends with someone you have shaggëd before without one or both of you scheming ways of rolling back the years. even if you are mature enough to stay decent, can you trust the intentions of the other party? no!!!

dayokanu: [img]http://cadfael.tv/image/src/1358694203691.gif[/img]

torres doing what fools around here said he could not do. they said torres has no pace and yet he skinned a defender but szczesny read the situation perfectly and snuffed out the danger. demba ba on the other hand shot tamely with no goalie in the net.

dayokanu: Demba ba has scored 3 goals in 3 starts
Mata even has more goals

demba ba has 1 league goal in 170 mins for chelsea - games against southampton in a domestic cup does not count!

dayokanu: Torres lack of strenght cost the team a cleansheet today.
You dont lose balls anyhow on the field. Torres is just too useless.

torres was clearly fouled unless you are suffering from the pink eye. the ref had an absolute shocker of a game. he missed ramirez's foul on coquelin as well and mata scored from the same run of play. chelsea still had 6 defenders when torres lost the ball - arsenal still had a lot to do to get the ball into the net. all demba ba had to do was chip the ball into the far corner from 6 yards and yet he could only give vermaelen a weak pass - it's not surprising, ba went almost 1200 mins last season without scoring for newcastle!

If it was Demba Ba who had those valuable 80min Torres spent pissing in the wind the game would have been over earlier

he missed the best chance against an empty net. why do you think he would have scored a hatrick if he had spent 80 mins on the pitch?

https://gifsoup.com/view6/4476420/walcott-goal-o.gif

tackle from behind - that's a foul everyday of the week!!!

dayokanu: Specifically he needs ORHEPTAL blood tonic and Ribena.

Let him tell us the chelsea player who lost the ball for Arsenals goal? the one who wasted opportunity upon chances

that was a clear foul on torres - as analysed on match of the day! you really need to open your eyes when you watch this game. funny how you blame torres for losing the ball 50 yards away from chelsea goal and yet fail to see demba ba's horrible miss 7 yards from goal with only a defender to beat on the line.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_WtFt2IPApY&sns=em

Ibime: Hahaha. Standing ovation. This ninja needs medication

see this tool - after lying to us ba has permanently demoted torres to the bench, the outcome was different. on came a london derby against arsenal - one of chelsea's biggest games of the season and it was ba on the bench and not torres! what do you have to say? i thought you said the thoughts of your fellow deluded chelsea fans on talksports count for something....