₦airaland Forum

this thread has gone to the dogs again as usual....

some things would never change. only an uncouth, mannerless and idiotic wife would lash out at her mother-in-law and order her to leave.....for feck's sake, where is the moral code gone in africa these days? can the original poster ask her own mother out? how would the original poster react if the husband asks her mother out of the house? some women just love to think with the soles of their feet.

a woman had her son, raised him, trained him, educated him to be a responsible son. all her tears, all her pains, all her struggles, all her prayers and then a tooth-pick legged heifer comes into the son's life only to try and put a wedge between the son and his mother. it shall not be well with such wife and i hope and pray she raises a son whose wife would do the same to her. no woman born of a woman would disrespect my mother....that's the day she shall return to her parents and they had better return my bride price and my goat!

Joagbaje: If the man of God , said he didn't use church money that should settle it. He couldnt have said so openly if it's not so. People over there would have taken him up on it if it were not so. We like to believe wrong report about ministers. But We doubt truths . Its sad.

i couldn't have said it better....
if the pastor says the university wasn't built with tithes and offerings, so be it. however, i think they should be using the funds they get more judiciously. instead of buying jets, they can build a large factory for the unemployed youths in the church. the wealth should be spreading down the pyramid!

chamotex: I think we should only play igbo hip-hop music...Arsenal need cash

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6oB52-pb7Y

debosky: Terrible performance in the end, when you fail to take your chances this is what happens.

No excuses whatsoever - if you can't beat Bradford then you players need to question yourselves and whether you are worthy of wearing the shirt.

stop the rants jare - na just carling cup!
we all know any away match to minnows would be difficult - it's like world cup to them. when vermaelen scored in the 87th min, i was wondering why would he? extra 30 mins of slugfest and then what? if there was going to be a replay - then such goals are needed. however, that goal only made arsenal play 120 mins and then nothing to show for it in the end. your next league game would probably be another draw or loss - the fatigue would surely tell!

dayokanu: Na negative spending make Dem loose to Bradford

city lost, man utd lost, arsenal lost. which big club is yet to lose to minnows in cup competitions? i have told you countless times you wear your arsë on head!!!

danjohn: To all the cynics who are saying that it is natural for babies to able to swim, please experiment with your baby. Put your baby inside a swimming pool without any flotation device and tell us if your child survives.

the baby would survive - babies do move hands and feet and they are not even aware of any danger so they just do their thing. go on youtube and watch babies at 4 months swimming smoothly over short distances.

[quote author=baby_123]God forbid KFC! I wouldn't even eat there with my enemies money. Not to talk of Saga's dough . Too cheap. [/quote]manage am like that - it's a good place to start just to be sure none of you is about to date a psychopath.

4llerbuntu: odoyo oshi. thank u. we no want. keep enjoying your nani. reserves captain na im be "potent winger"? wait make i call starboard for u

fück off you anorexic centipede!
these stats are not far-fetched - tabulate nani's goals/assists and compare to any winger in the league(taking the mins spent on the pitch into consideration) and get back to me. 4llerbuntu, you are mentally sterile!

[quote author=baby_123]hahahaha you are just trying to boost your friends ego. I can tell he is still hurting from previous clashes. Keep pushing him to enter one chance. His superiors o ti bolowo e. Na im mama go come call you to enter bush to release the son, dont worry. When she sees him washing paient. . 5,000 ko, one chance ni.[/quote]some people have survived "one chance" - most alpha males do anyways.

[quote author=baby_123]@Coogar,
You miss how much Saga has fallen. He wants to take me out and do nice things. Saga is all mouth. He doesn't stand a chance fighting. He will go down. [/quote]kfc is actually a nice place to start. if it gets too crowded, then it's burger king or nando's.
these treats are part of the scheme. nothing softens a woman more than good food and cute whispers. don't worry, you would be fine!

y me: Thats deceit and him stooping so low to get a woman shows he is less of a man too
that scenario na epic fail!

what's low in washing the undies of one's partner?
come on - £5000 + a roll in the hay versus hand-washing panties. hmmmm, majority don't make £5000 a month, how much more - one night! getting the woman is the key - the methods used to get there is irrelevant!

tpia1: The question has been answered multiple times on the thread.
As to whether you disagree or agree with the reasons stated, is another topic on its own.

and why should we believe your answer seeing that you have avoided the questions thrown at you? if you cannot defend the answers provided then its not credible. the answers provided do not make sense and if they don't make sense, there's a high probability that you are telling porkies!

[quote author=baby_123]

Now that is just desperate. .

The possibility of me using it to blackmail him though will stop him in his tracks.

By the way, Saga's way of thinking = Too many clashes. .

The issue is he sees me as something he must conquer.

I dont know, maybe it will make him feel more manly. . I will gladly squash all attempts. [/quote]desperation?
how do you know pundits have not staked their ££££ on sagamite to fail in his bid to get the goldmine? if saga stands to win £5000 from various bets you think washing clean panties would deter him? little did you know that saga has been trying to upgrade his audi to a benz!

dayokanu: Did anyone see Steven Fletchers goal just now? while Fernandud keeps waiting for service on plates

torres was scoring such for fun jare when he had teamies that understood him.

Sweetlemon: What I'm trying to explain here is that a man can still be a man no matter how much love he gives a woman. He can kiss her feet and @ the same time still let her know he's in charge. The guy I described in my 1st post treats me like a queen, spoils me rotten and could break the head of anyone who mistakenly steps on my feet. But he let's me know that he's in charge and that if I mess up, I'm on my own. That's what I'm trying to explain here

if you guys were to breakup tonight, who would be hurt more? you or him? if its him then you are in charge, not him!

[quote author=baby_123]Surrenders? I know it is something he would rather die, than do. So it will never happen.[/quote]don't be too sure.....
the end would justify the means - 98% of the men i know would do worse than hand-washing undies just to reach the goldmine. he would simply claim you were ill and he helped out. that single move would even get him more chics.

[quote author=baby_123]
ok ooo, that is if you get the opportunity to zip it down or get it up.
You would have to pose with a picture of you washing my pant first. Otherwise, nothing. [/quote]finally, she surrenders......

^^^ladies behave!!!!
this is not a beef market - calm down or go and sip some coffee.

Nashville: You have said the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Alot of our young girls these days come into marriage with soo much gabage in them that they create unnecessary problems for themselves. The bible says a wise woman builds her home, while a foolish woman destroys her home with her own hands. Poster, sorry to say, but you are a foolish woman.

If it was you mum that came to stay, would you be this mad? The Bible says a man shall leave his father and mother and cling to his wife. But I do not mean it literally means you should stop having a relationship with them. The same Bible says Honour your father and your mother. His mother cannot replace you, it cannot happen, she is the mother and you are the wife; those two roles cannot be interchangeable.

If she complains about you, tell your husband to talk to her, it is not in your place to confront her. What if you husband treated your own mother or father like that, I am sure you will be excited.

don't mind her....
she needs to go apologise - what she did was inexcusable....only a wife who has no regards for her own parents would lash out at her in-laws. it really says something about her upbringing. i want to know what her own parents said about her actions? i doubt they would support such nonsense.

dayokanu: Lets watch another spin now? Coogar can you tell us how many Penalties has Tevez, Ba or all those strikers taken this season? Waiting for an answer. Remove the penalty figures and recompute. Lets see.

you carry the burden of proof....
recompute with the latest stats and let us have the results. penalties ain't the only set piece in football. there's direct freekick too like the one van persie scored against city! it's a clear cut chance.

I know you are dumb and if you cant see that Total shots is a summation of shots on target and off target. In summary Torres has the lowest shots taken of all the strikers polled..

you are simply mentally deranged for blaming a player with the highest accuracy in shots taken. torres' 63% means he's more accurate than his peers - the total lack of shots means he doesn't get enough chances from his team mates. torres has played more minutes than most of the strikers on that list, why is he with the lowest clear cut chances?

My job is to show the public your foolishness and almost everyone on this thread has seen that you are being dishonest while Nateevs is just being dumb. You know the truth but just twist it, Nateevs on the other hand doesnt know any better. He still believes Vertical passes were what made Torres score on Saturday

your stats do not show the actual situation of things.....
33% of torres' goals were not included in your stats. besides, the clear cut chances included dead ball situations which torres never took as at the time the stats were computed.

nateevs is busy laughing at your idiocy blaming a guy with the lowest "off target" shots! that's the height of your stupidity tonight. i have murdered you on the arsenal thread and i have decapitated your head here. dayo, nowhere to hide!!!!!

carefreewannabe: coogar, you think like that?
oh no

that's the reality!

Tgirl4real: What a depressing and hearthbreaking comment!!!
Sagamite, u sef second this. Too bad!!!
Are u guys saying the so-called alpha male can't be in love? And can't be a one-woman man?

of course, he can - but it would be at his own time, his own pace. he won't be rushed by any woman or any circumstance. he would settle down when he's ready

OMO IBO: rotflmao
i just love coogar man. . . .no homo though.

dude and nateevs asked for stats.
stats have been supplied with damining evidence but coogar somehow isnt convinced.

lmao . . . i love you man!

no homills braw!

but look at the stats supplied.....
a whopping 33% of the goals torres has scored were not included. now every striker bar suarez completed 90 mins on that chart. demba ba, defoe and tevez fired blanks while torres scored 2 goals. are you saying this adjustment would not read a better results for torres?

then again, clear cut chances = chances from open play + chances from set pieces.
torres until last weekend never took a set piece for chelsea. the others mostly took and it's easier to score from 12 yards or a direct freekick at the edge of the box with defenders 10 yards away than scoring from open play. obviously, torres would be disadvantaged!

dayokanu: Like I told you, I would oblige humanity and always school you in footballing matters
How much did Arsenal buy Jose Antonio Reyes?

dayo, stop trying to be intelligent!
i stay in europe - as at 2004, you were still in bauchi cracking palm kernel so football finance as of 2004 isn't what you should be delving into - you are too limited to cope!

as at jan 2004, the euro was a weak currency to the british pounds - arsenal paid £17m to buy reyes. the equivalent in euros then is what transfermarkt listed - which they have now converted back to pounds in 2012. get some education and stop brainfarting!

http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/en/statistiken/transferrekorde/transfers.html
Number 46 on that table

i'll let ibime lecture you on the fall of pounds to euros between 2004 and 2012. if you really think wenger spent £31m on reyes as at 2004 then i have overestimated your intelligence quotient. if you are not idiotic - you mean man utd paid £40m for rio(2002) on your list and robinho as at 2009 broke the british transfer record at £32.5m? is there any relationship between beanpoles and dementia?

dayokanu: Once again I have shut the pro Torres camp with incontrovertible fact that Torres is useless. The least clear cut chance conversion among top strikers

how did i miss this? chimo!!!!
dayo's brain is doing the usual 21-fart salute again. the faggöt didn't even consider the fact that clear cut chance = chances from open play and the ones from a set piece. a tevez that has almost a dead accuracy in tucking his penalty would have his conversion rate higher than nando torres(who does not have the same luxury)....what a gibbon!

Torres has the worst minute per goal of all the strikers compared, Tied for the least shot on target with Giroud, , Has the lowest shots off target (What we have been saying Torres is too timid to take shots) The worst min/per shots on targe

worst minute per goal - idiotic teammates not passing to him.
least shot on target - idiotic teammates not giving him the ball in the final third
lowest shots off target? you mean torres being more accurate with his shots on target is a demerit? somebody should please return this brainless beanpole back to his village. the money spent on your development is a waste.

how can you blame a striker for having the lowest shot off target? christ!
nateevs, you are unkind! you read this piece and you were enjoying it selfishly without sending me a PM to come laugh off dayo's idiocy. if the height of stupidity is as tall as everest, dayo would skip it in one attempt!

dayokanu: I have told you that youre a footballing neophyte. Most posters here know that you post loads bar common sense

a goat must have pissed on your head when you were a child cos i don't think you reason objectively when you talk.

But this is a chart starring you in the face. When Arsenal last won the league, they had better net spend that All clubs except Chelsea The chart is there in front of you to see.

duh, that's why they won the league - you are making my own argument here. arsenal spent most bar chelsea in 03/04 when they won the league unbeaten - it then means when you spend, you would win!

Arsenal still had positive net spends in 3 seasons. Valencia is even in a worse situation where by they had to sell all their top players cant even spend much in the last 3 seasons yet have sacked a coach for incompetence?

valencia weren't in a worse situation than arsenal unless you are a nincompoop. valencia's net spend in 07/08 was €64m. they bought a single player(joaquin) €25m that same season. have arsenal ever managed to buy a player at €25m in their entire history? like i said.....you are a glorified simpleton!

When they define tools in the dictionary your photo should be next to it. It was Wenger that brought success to Arsenal? Are you serious? Like Arsenal was in division 2 before they hired Wenger? A team that played back to back UEFA cup finals a team that won 10 league titles before then? So what has Wenger won for Arsenal that hasnt been achieved before by previous coaches? Never mind that no coach has stayed as long as Wenger

you are a disgraceful HIV-infected dork and you should be the living example of the word "demented". wenger has ensured arsenal keep playing in elite europe for more than a decade back to back......he has made money for them, got them a modern stadium. chelsea and liverpool are still at sea in getting a high capacity stadium. furthermore, wenger delivered trophies when there was money to compete with ferguson......

ferguson didn't just continue to achieve because he suddenly developed supernatural powers, wenger only stopped receiving the finds needed to compete at the top. do your math and calculate the total net spend by arsenal in your chart and see how far behind they are to their rivals. they are 9th on that table and you expect them to win the league? are you genetically foolish? that arsenal are still finishing 3rd/4th is a testament to wenger's brilliance.

once again, coogar leaves dayo's tura-bleached face in his concoction-induced early morning hot https://fc01.deviantart.net/fs24/f/2007/362/9/8/_shithappens__rvmp_by_bad_blood.gif

dayokanu: Has Valecia gone 7yrs trophyless? What was the net spend of Valencia when they won La Liga and UEFA cup? in 4 seasons Whats the net spend of Valencia?

who cares what valencia do in spain? this is why people think you reason with the sole of your feet. valencia last won la liga the same season arsenal did. when arsenal won it, they also had man utd, chelsea and liverpool spending more than them. then arsenal stopped spending around 2005 to build the emirates stadium, valencia continued to spend till 2008(they won copa del rey) and in your huge stupidity, you want me to compare arsenal and valencia?

Did that stop them from sacking their coach for poor performance?
You are a tool

yet dayo's buffoonery continues.....
it was wenger that brought success to arsenal in the first place - why would the club suddenly forget what he's done with the limited funds they have provided for him? the bloke valencia sacked - did he win la liga, copa del rey and uefa cup for them as a manger? what's the basis for comparison between wenger that won titles for arsenal AND the ex-player turned manager whose biggest managerial job was assisting benitez in liverpool?

dayokanu: Valencia has a positive net spend in 2008 thats why they won a trophy? Well the table below shows us Arsenal had positive net spends in 3 of the most recent seasons yet are trophyless.
https://www.sportingintelligence.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/PL-decade-spending.jpg

and yet the baboon manages to embarrass himself further - dayo, the only beanpole who knows how to get the stats but consistently fails to make deductive reasonings from them. now let me school you on football finance......

according to your idiotic self, as long as the net spend is positive then a team should win a trophy? nothing to do with how much the competition around them have spent? nothing to do with how much positive in comparison with the rivals? to call you an illiterate would be an insult to the illiterates cos these people would have gained more intelligence if they had the opportunity you have.....what a troglodyte!

as of 07/08, valencia spent €76m on players and sold €8m making it a net spend of €64m. in the 4 yrs leading to 2007/8(the last time valencia won a trophy), the accrued net spend was €133m. in debosky's terms, valencia had the base of €133m net spend in the 4 yrs leading to their last trophy. have arsenal ever had £64m net spend in a single season in the premier league?

now do the comparison with arsenal in the years they have been trophyless......now do another comparison with arsenal and their rivals in their premier league and tell me if wenger has any chance of winning anything.....
dayo, schooling you is a hobby! if you ever beat me in an argument, it's harakiri for me.

I have told you on this forum I would always continue to school you. The chart the provides Torres conversion rate on Chelsea thread showed you to be a doofus and this one again less than 24hrs time frame

see this idiotic buffoon.
conversion rate my foot - comparing players who take free kicks and penalties to a player who doesn't take - are you a schlepper? every direct freekick van persie and demba ba take are clear cut chances and the probability of hitting the target is high cos it's a set piece. you are a tool!

to have a balanced assessment, get us the clear cut chances from open play and let's see if torres is as disadvantaged as you foolishly think. the single most important factor in your stats was torres' shot accuracy that is way higher than the other strikers and low number of chances he gets. since i made my reply, you have not rebutted it because you know your stats have shamed you!


dayo - coogar is your god!

tpia1: @ coogar
do you ever get tired of doing drugs!!!! Your mood swings will improve when you're in menopause, i hope.

what has my drugs or lack of it gotta do with this? i asked you a simple question and the next thing was for you to raise your shoulders like you have got a dozen boils in both of your armpits! lighten up and stop PMSing...

if you know how to read, two separate matters are being discussed on the thread.
1. pregnant women being told to put pins on their person to ward against evil
2. pins on person in order to have some handy when needed.
do you get it now, or you need to sniff some more crack to focus?

so your cognitive reasoning cannot detect these 2 events are not mutually exclusive? if a woman who loves to carry pins on her person suddenly gets pregnant - would she still carry the pins to ward off evil spirits or not? that's the question i asked you before your brain did the usual 21-fart salute!

successbuilder: Does it really matter how man boy friends i have

it doesn't matter - as long as you didn't have up to 40 boyfriends
40 is the threshold!

tpia1: I doubt it matters if i do or dont, since its not your business, is it?

oh shut up you hypersensitive hag....
why do you always carry a constipated aura around? i was asking a genuine question since you said you sometimes attach voodoo pins to your cloth. sheeesh, i think you need to take life easy before you blow your gasket. damn! on a second thought, i think you need to get laid.

y me: Yeah . . . . And they end up getting married to the DEVIL
good thing there are women out there giving these guys a good run for their Alphamism

the alpha male simply moves to the next available catch - no regrets! unlike the "nice" men who would start crying over the phone and generally constitute a nuisance by stalking, threatening to harm, etc.

k2039: I can tell you with all certainity that if she has never been approached by a guy in her life, then something is obviously wrong.

She needs to come out with her records, has she ever dated, has she ever been asked out by a guy, what is her definition of a husband(probabble he is looking for an ideal man that just doesnt exist) etc

of course, she would have been approached but she's too busy to listen to the drivel of those men......her record is clean...it must be very clean for her to think its possible to score at her age. do u want her or not?

dayokanu: Valencia has a net spend way inferior to other top teams in Spain Yet they havent gone 7yrs trophyless and they still sacked their coach for under performance

almost 24 hrs later and dayopkanu is yet to furnish us the net spend of valencia in the same season they won their last trophy? is this coincidence or dayokanu has been found out again for making demented comparisons to arsenal? debosky, shouldn't there be a puniushment(one week ban) for posters who make idiotic statements? please, let's make this section a better place by banning idiotic posters.

Sagamite: GBAM!

They can lie so convincingly to the point even they themselves believe what they are saying is the truth and that makes it more convincing when they say it.

Don't listen to what women say, watch what they do.

"If he calls me, I will tell him to fck off".

He calls, she picks up: "Hi, how are you? I really miss you. Come down to my city and have cake and meat pies".

thank you very much.....
if nice guys are truly what women want - why is it that most nice guys are single? women generally don't want predictable and the boring blokes....they want the excitement and the thrill of being with a bad guy. shymmex needs dating lessons. good things come to those who wait? rubbish! far better things come to those who chase.

shymexx: Basically, I don't think chics like arrogant, controlling, and self-centred guys... They prefer confident guys who can act like a man with authority... However, there's a thin line between confidence and arrogance vis-a-vis authority and controlling - you just have to know not to cross that line... Once you do, it becomes problematic..

You don't necessarily need to be a "bad guy" to smash as many chics as possible, as long as the chics know where they stand and there's mutual respect... To be honest, bad guys don't really pull that many chics if they show their true colours from the beginning, most fake it till they get the chics in their chokehold... No one wants a heartless jerk...

Being there, done that - being a bad guy just breeds hatred, it's a lose lose situation...

you probably haven't figured chics out yet then.....
from my experience, chics actually like the arrogant, controlling and the self-centred guys. mind, what chics say in the open is a stark contrast of what they want. shymmex, a man like you should know that. being a bad guy is the surest way to score chics - it's a win-win situation. even if the chic leaves you, no regrets cos you were never there for her anyway. however, if a chic leaves you after playing "bobo nice" to her, then you are done! little wonder men carry acids and all sorts because their women cheated on them. you think a bad guy has time for such nonsense? one door closes, another 6 open!