DavidEsq's Posts
Nairaland Forum › DavidEsq's Profile › DavidEsq's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 (of 238 pages)
opethom:Bolanle like beta tin |
Dude resembles an old version of Segalink |
MoonandStar:I wouldn't know much about that but I could find out from their priest if u so desire. However, u could use a marriage registry. No stress for tha one |
bluefilm:No need for all these. Just get a good lawyer and and make a will |
MoonandStar:Most big and old churches are certified by the ministry of interior to conduct marriages. Such marriages are very valid, 101%. |
Reelmii:Newspaper publications have archives. Marriage Registries have records of marriages. If u can find out the places the person has lived, no matter how short the period of his residence in that area, u can visit the marriage registries located in those places and find out from them. However, these things aren't supposed to be so. The ministry of interior should a unified record of statutory marriages done Nationwide, from which records, a person intending to marry may apply to view, to find out if the person he/she wants to marry is already married or was formerly marriage. This expertise is unknown to those Zombies whose sense of direction is not longer than their greedy noses. Making such a record would have been an opportunity for the minister to make money, because a budget on this has to be raised. Then applicants who want to check their records get to pay application fees and are also issued with certificates of their findings. All these would take in money for the ministry on a coded level. But dem no sabi find coded money. There is this divorce case I did for a prison officer who was married to a soldier. The woman didn't know that the soldier was earlier married and even had HIV. Dude didn't tell her sh1t. It was the 1st wife who say her post on Facebook that told her the dude was married to her. Both marriages we're court marriages. Now the soldier is liable to imprisonment of 7 years (bigamy) and the marriage is null and void from the start die to the existence of the earlier marriage. U can imagine what the lady would have been saved from if such unified records of marriages exists in an easily accessible form. Another voiding factor is the fact that the soldier has a communicable disease which he hid from her. A marriage partner who has a communicable sexual disease cannot make a valid marriage, where he/she does not disclose the disease to the partner before the marriage. |
TemmyT002:I won a case on Gbari custom of inheritance and marriage for a widow who was a wife to a late councilor. Her in-laws threw her out of the matrimonial home and took everything from her, with the aid of the chief of her village. They claimed she wasn't properly married according to Gbari custom. I showed the chief serious shege in court and all her in-laws. It was a vigorous trial and the chief went about slaughtering Rams and calling my name in several shrines, according to the woman and her ppl who were also doing their own shrine activities. Now why am I saying this? Idbthe woman and her late husband had done court marriage, much of this would have been avoided. That is not say that in-laws drama doesn't happen in court marriage, but it is reduced, especially if the family has a lawyer. BTW, marriage is not a must ehn. u can be having baby mamas upandan. |
kemade14:Pls it's not that expensive to get a court order. |
Get the account details, get a police investigation to commence on that account which would be flagged by the bank, to catch anyone who tries to withdraw money or make further operations on that account. The account has a mobile phone number. The police should track that number with the communication network. Now the bank would tell the police how much is in the account. Then get a court order to remove the money from the account, back to the sender's account. Done this on several occasions and it works fine. |
OP, some vital points u raised here are not consistent with the position of the law. You stated that there are two types of marriage registries in Nigeria, namely Federal and state/local government marriage registries. This is flawed because as u rightly stated: "A legal marriage is protected under the Marriage Act, Chapter 218 of Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 1990". Take notice of the phrase, "Marriage Act", which means that marriage is strictly withing the powers of the federal government of Nigeria, courtesy of the National Assembly, to regulate or make laws thereon. So it would be flawed to suggest that local governments should have marriage registries which issue certificates of marriage, when they have no powers to do so. Marriage is regulated by the ministry of interior, which is a federal government agency and it is only the marriage certificates issued on the authority of this ministry, that is valid. Any other marriage certificate issued without this authority is null and void and an empty valueless piece of paper. This is why in a recent judgement of the high court sitting at Lagos State, such marriage certificates issued by the local governments were declared to have been done without the authority of the ministry of interior and as such, null and void. That certificate of marriage is called Form E, which is contained in the Marriage Act and any certificate of marriage inconsistent with this Form E, is invalid. However, following the recent announcement by the ministry of interior on this issue, coupled with the judgment of the high court, any marriage done prior to this pronouncements are deemed valid because the parties themselves have committed no deliberate wrong. Hence they have to get a recertification of their marriage certificate, but several court decisions show that this is not mandatory to validate a marriage. Therefore, it is not every marriage registry that is a valid place of marriage, with the attendant powers to issue valid marriage certificates. There are other factors to be considered in determining how to go about a valid marriage. Hola at me via my mail. Cheers, OP. |
DonFreshmoney:U are not well at all |
Buhari sef |
Hm |
rottennaija:I thought I saw u the oda day chewing fried one |
Kobicove:Share, yes, but not like |
itsme01: . |
Roon9: . Awon "fell pregnant" |
Hairyrapunzel:Now he flipping and feeling froggy. Leap! |
DECLAN2015:and so u smack your own back and cough out the food. Is that difficult to do? |
Olajumoke11:Have u answered read scriptures have u. U have not also answered my questions. |
Hairyrapunzel:Goan include or quote those scriptures u claimed in your parochial self inflicted grandstandism and deep seated search for self justification, that were according to u, wr excluded. I do not believe in big words or grandstanding or being easily irked by the views of a religious sect just because I was probably cast out and feel the need to always slam dem, whenever subjects relating to them crop up in the internet. I'm not sworn to sweat to death over a particular religious sect, to besmear them just because I feel they shouldn't have cast me out. I'm not the one with a history of always having the veins on my neck and forehead stand out to bursting point just because the name of religious sect is called up online. I don't worry my already stressed bones with obvious petty talk. Dont u see the pain u have taken to scan thru this thread and hop on the head of anyone who u feel has a view divergent to yours? It wouldn't take lummy to figure out the source or reason for ur huffs and puffs which have no bearing in plain open reasoning. Now watch how he flips his switch or blows his top. |
Make we see her skin, make we confirm say she no dey bleach |
Hefy4real:Thumbs up. His emptiness is notorious and his emotional outbursts and huffs and puffs re-echo his pitiable emptiness |
Hairyrapunzel:U haven't answered my questions, oga ITK |
Hairyrapunzel:I do not believe God's word is up for debate. This is because Romans 10:2,3 explain your stand very much. It also appears u have not convinced yourself on your position on those verses u seek to expatiate. |
Hairyrapunzel:So to "correct" me u shld have included what was "stylishly" omitted. |
visaland:U said ur so-called reporter rushed to scene, yet no pictures to prove such eyewitness account. U see your beer parlour career? Don't goan look for work. Keep telling stories exchanged over cups and kettles of burukutu |
Mariangeles:We can come to the safe conclusion that she didn't provide a scriptural backing for her opinion, neither did u. What does the Bible say about use of blood? Have u taken note of this scripture at Leviticus 17:10: "If any man of the house of Israel or any foreigner who is residing in your midst EATS any sort blood, I will certainly set my face against the one who is eating the blood, and I will cut him off from among his people". God knew that such time when the use of blood transfusion would come, hence in Acts 15:20 says: "but to write to them to abstain from from things polluted by idols, from sexual immorality, from what is strangled, and from blood". At verse 29 of Acts 15, it says: "to keep abstaining from things sacrificed to idols, from blood, from what is strangled, and from sexual immorality. IF YOU KEEP THESE THINGS, YOU WILL PROSPER. GOOD HEALTH TO YOU" Have u come across these scriptures? CC Olajumoke11 |
laosy:And yam leg ![]() |
Kekereekun123:No it will not. Shey u dey like prophecy na. Read the scriptures well. Particularly Daniel 2:31-45. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 (of 238 pages)

