₦airaland Forum

The first is bad for you and the second may be a worse manipulator.. You are too needy, forgiving and giving. Ladies don't respect such character.

malel1:
Oga will Smith no get hiv get ur facts right

it's a typo.

OoniOfIfe:
I have said it before nd will continue saying it, that rubbish called HIV/AIDS doesn't exist. It is just a manipulative tool by d whites, christians nd moslems 2 discourages sex by those who ar not married nd also by condom manufacturers to sell their products. If it trully exist how come no famous celebrity or any world leader has gotten it cos they sex almost every day without condom. They even lied that fella died of sex but how come none of his children or wife has it. AIDS doesn't exist

Charley Sheen, etc have HIV, don't fool yourself with conspiracy thinking.
It's not usually talked about among celebrities because they have access to ARV and don't make a big deal out of it.
Viruses that embed themselves in DNA are best taken care of by the immune system, only that HIV directly infects immune cells which means they can't respond to it until other infections they normally fight wreck the body until the infected is so weak against them they die.

It's called KP(can't recall the full name, if you Google it you'll see the full name), I used Rice Water to clear mine(check Rice Water to wash face on wiki).

Don't let that part of skin be too dry, moisturize with light oils. And for the love of God don't scrub or use harsh foam on that part of your face.

Was the act on school grounds?

Are there rules against having sex outside the school session?

Are students expected to be virgins?

Did she knowingly try to disrupt the activities of the school?

If you know the answers to these, then you know Nigeria is indeed a zoo.

Boringdraw1:
Is sex food? Because the way all the above guys are describing men's bananas as if na food. Sex is overrated, nothing sweet inside.

Actually yes, sex is 2 times rewarding than food even.

Juju is never used beyond what normally can happen. So what's to differentiate it from pure chance or hearsay?

If Africa were the hub of juju and mysticism we'd be the most advanced continent there is. Magic mirrors to travel or send items.. Earth shakers to mine or construct buildings.. Fire conjurers to process metals, Necromancers to summon the dead as a cheap source of Labour, etc. Nigeria would be like the Aztecs.. Is that the Africa/Nigeria we know?

Nope, it's the Nigeria that a countryman keeps battling malaria and typhoid most of his/her life and never asks himself anything beyond what his local pastor, imam or peers believe about the world, a place where people pass disinformation through whatsapp and the Internet.

Ulefone Power 3S lasts a full day under heavy usage and it has 6GB ram for 55k. It even lasts 4 days when used normally. Caveats are mtk chip, 3hr charge time and poor camera, other than that it's a good budget phone for that price. Though I'd recommend buying a Xioami or Huawei snapdragon chip phone, they are more reliable.

Too bad Nigeria is so homophobic, any sense of feminine trait in a man is discouraged.
I could even say most Nigerians are vexed against anything they aren't familiar with or can't gain from. Tribe on tribe hatred, political thuggery, religious fanatism, Illiteracy and/or willful ignorance has led to all this.

I mean a cross-dressers party was invaded by cops on morality charges.. Have we reverted back to a time when twin babies were being killed and people feared their own shadows?

What's next, arresting atheists?

Niiiiiicccee, tho you'd only control weak men this way.

Ernest4321:
Dude how can u not mention 1050ti

Because an AMD RX 470 is better than it and the "50's" are considered entry level by Nvidia..They're good for esports titles like csgo(counter strike global offensive) but can't run games like Mortal Kombat 11 above low - medium settings..

Your best bet are Nvidia 880m, 980m, 1060, 960, 2060 or 1660 ti, anything different and you'll regret buying it in a year. Go to notebookcheck dot net and you'll see "mobile graphics cards" that'll give you a list of laptop gpus and which games they play at what setting and framerate(36 upward or it'll show up as green)

Ironically if you were fast enough to put the tooth back in fast enough, it would reattach and grow as normal-google it.

Tales by moonlight..

Religious beliefs aside(because obviously, psychology can't be deduced from them).

I know the topic is trying to answer their manipulative behavior and their entitlement mentality.

Women were the ones who sat at home while men hunted, they were the ones who were captured alive and given to other men after a rival group invaded the village, they were the ones who were required to look after children and cling to men who can provide for those children.

They will always look out for themselves(even subconsciously) than men who can give their lives just to make them happy and would gladly move to the next man if he does. Those traits are common because it's what made women bear the children of men who could hunt and not talk about their "feelings" or "gossip" in the village square all day. And if this men died they could easily find the next one.

They may even bear the children of these men and raise them with a "weaker man" until a "more capable man" presented himself to challenge the man over her. Hence why they are looking for the next best thing or upgrade themselves to seek the attention of a more fulfilled person.

Blabbermouth:
Argue constructively next time.
Point for point. Just like I did. Look up the post I replied ur nonsense.
Its a hard pill, just swallow it and move on, and stop hiding behind "Everything is nonsense, even tho I can't find a counter".
Once again, don't stress me, if you are to raise something against it, let it be smtin the epistle either didn't cover or u didn't find satisfactory. All those u stated, I went thru a waste of time to re-express. Hope u are cleared.
God bless

You couldn't construe an argument worth the little mental effort I used to address you. I had a good time laughing at your baby logic though. Thanks

Blabbermouth:
Anyone that's reading this would think you have a point. But u didn't read the epistle well at all. You keep conflicting, agreeing with some and trying to counter it at the same time.
Look up this post readers, yh read the one b4 this. Even thou they were clearly explained in the epistle. This man Here want to argue blindly.
Well he has been thrown into a loop, it's either he concurs with logic or explain to us how something can come out of nothing. {which is also the same thing he frowned at}.
Hahaha
To God be the glory

LOL.. I like the way believers have to deny both facts, reason and logic to defend their arguments.
Your "epistles" crumbled under scrutiny like all arguments for metaphysical beings.

Blabbermouth:
Are you the same with @davien?. Moreover, I didn't see your counter. Well, Now you know there is God.
cheers.

Your logic doesn't work... So you can't say a god/gods exists based on it.

A rebuttal, proof or even a reassessment of your argument was not provided.

To be honest, it's nothing but false equivalence and misrepresentations.

Something always exists..

You group everything that does into the term "eternal something"

You impose it has no needs not already met by itself and yet again impose a will that requires it to have wants.. Thus not only contradicting yourself but conjuring an unsubstantiated claim that can't be logically proven but require evidence.

You claim all things that create/produce other things are in of themselves greater than their creations while ignoring things like atoms, people, DNA, matter, the gases that form our atmosphere, electrons, protons, that form/produce things greater than themselves through cause and effect.

Then add a gender to which your "eternal something" can be addressed and then finally landing on your preconceived bias and terming it God.

If you have to go to such great lengths of bad logic to believe in god, is it worth the mental loops.. Since it doesn't make sense, why not use faith instead of dishonesty?

A lot of folks keep concentrating on him not believing in god/gods yet may not even be morally sound..

Is it not human beings that believe in god and yet abuse their maids, workers, neighbors, family, friends and do horrible things in the country?

Believing in god isn't equal to being good/moral..

Most people who equate the two are looking for who to exploit or gain favour from.

Blabbermouth:
Beloved, (are u @JeromeBlack?)
1. Check out the link I posted a page b4 where the final epistle you saw is, the logical reply to all your assumptions is there. CHECK THAT OUT FIRST
2.NOTHING in that context was used to facilitate understanding. Because it isnt in your realm doesn't mean it can't exist. If u have never felt PAIN, and someone else was telling u how pain is like, you would say "Logically, it isn't part of anything I've felt therefore u are a liar, it doesn't exist". If ye Will, use the SOMETHING/SOMEONE u are accustomed to, either ways, if u re-read the link , then the final epistle , you would still arrive at what I was trying to pass across
3. That your notion of " cat can't produce anything other than cat" tell me please *Robots, Humanoid, Sex Doll* are they really human? , why can't your notion for cat hold same for HUMANS. Now u see don't you? Also I don't see how these things can be greater than humans.
4. Tell me in summary, your notion is "if I can't see, touch or feel it, it doesn't exist" .I laugh in calculus.
5. Almost everything in that epistle, was based on logic of "what is evident presently"
If I see an art in a hotel room(the evident), I could conclude from logic that, "An artiste made the art" if not, there would be no such art in that room.
A simple brain teaser
Where does the numbers (123) start from?
6. Once again go and re-read those epistles from the scratch b4 dragging meh back to things that has been cleared already.
7. If u now see anything out of place.
Pinpoint them, so it could be ironed outeternal

Address my points coherently(one after the other, reply each post as I did).

And most importantly, clarify each term in the context you are referring to... Awaiting your reply to my posts(remember to quote and address each notion so the debate can progress)

Though what is true about your "EPISTLES", is that they're unfounded and leads up to the "begging the question" fallacy.. What you're trying to prove is beyond logic... Hence faith is the medium it is believed with.

Blabbermouth:
This is the final Epistle in a series that began with
WAS THERE EVER NOTHING? , followed by
SOMETHING , then followed by WHO. The primary points made in those studies are as follows:
(1) Absolutely Nothing never existed. If it had, there would still be Absolutely Nothing now. But Something Else exists. You, for example.

We've already established the notion of nothing cannot be put in use by physical states from my previous reply to your post.

(2) Since Absolutely Nothing never existed, there was always a time when there was something in existence. This something we can call the Eternal Something.

How do we know we can group it as a something instead of somethings? Or categorize it as an eternal something and not an eternal group of things each one more "eternal" than the last and thus arriving at a something that isn't as "eternal" as the rest(that-is our universe)?

The Eternal Something has no beginning and no end, 1has no needs that It Itself cannot meet, 2can do whatever is possible that can be done, and 3will always be superior to anything It produces.

I put numbers in front of each claim to make you realize your folly.
For 1
What needs/requirement can we deduce from logic for an eternal something/somethings when we don't know it's properties or can even call it a collective something and not things that interact with both itself and other things it might inhabit or interact with?
We don't know to what extent or ability it requires and fulfills or fails to acquire.

For 2
Whatever is possible doesn't mean it can be done or exists directly from a thing. It's plausible to have elements orders of magnitude above the ones in the periodic table but those elements don't exist naturally.
It's possible to have 5 or more fingers but not all humans express the genes to give them that.

You have no reason to claim this something/somethings can do all things possible.

For 3
This logic doesn't even hold true in our universe.. Our sun was formed by hydrogen nuclei fusing together, it's substance isn't greater than what it produced.. A lot of things aren't greater than their creations. Assumption mute.

(3) The Eternal Something is not a machine, controlled or programmed by any force outside Itself.

How do we verify this claim? And if you can claim from 2 that it has "needs" then it must be influenced by something other than itself..
So your "logic" is attacking itself here.

And the Eternal Something will not produce out of necessity, since It has no needs.

How do we know this?

Therefore, if It produces Something Else, It must decide to do so.

How did you come about the claim it can decide things? And aren't decisions options influenced by needs or pathways that need to be explored?
So again, your logic is attacking itself here, if it has no needs not already met by itself, what prompts decisions if it can even make any at all?

That means that the Eternal Something has a will; thus, It is personal. Therefore, the Eternal Something must actually be an Eternal Someone (or Someones).

Nope, your previous claims aren't true. You're cherry picking here and it has crumbled your logic.

Continuing on, what can we discern about the Eternal Someone, beyond what has been stated already? (It's necessary here to transition from using "It" to "He" or "She" because the Eternal Something is an Eternal Someone. "He" has been chosen but gender is not an issue in this discussion.)
Since the Eternal Someone has no needs that He cannot fulfill on His own, He can exist without need of any kind of environment, for He existed when there was nothing else but Him. Any environment would be outside Him, and therefore would need to be produced. But all there is, is Him.
It's likely then that the Eternal Someone is transcendent. Meaning, He can exist outside of time and space, since He is bound by neither one. He existed eternally, thus being outside of time. And He exists without need of an environment, thus being outside of space.
Being transcendent of time and space, it's possible that the Eternal Someone is what we would call invisible. Only that which takes up space is visible. If something is outside of space, how could it be seen? Just so, the Eternal Someone is likely invisible and can exist without need of any kind of body or form.
THIS SOMEONE, THIS EXACT SOMEONE WITH THIS QUALITIES, THAT MADE EXISTENCE POSSIBLE IS WHO IS CALLED GOD, cause if this SOMETHING doesn't exist, then there should have been NOTHING a million years ago, and still NOTHING a million years after now. But since SOMETHING exists, therefore that SOMEONE/SOMETHING with those quality ascribed with the name GOD, TRULY EXISTS.
SO PAGANS AND ATHEIST, I HAVE PROVED UNTO THEE WITH THAT SAME LOGIC YOU UNDERSTAND that GOD TRULY EXISTS.
PS: I didn't ascribe this same God to any religion whether Islam, Christianity, Judaism or Hinduism.
Typing......

The above is nothing but wishful thinking and cherry picking.. You started good but had a preconceived notion at hand.

Blabbermouth:
Things even logic would agree to
1. Nothing can come out of nothing.

In the real sense this statement doesn't make any sense.. For one, "nothing" is what we humans use to define a lack of physical objects.. And no matter how much we push back the notion of "nothing" there is never a pure "nothing" state.

So "nothing" can come out of "nothing" is nonsensical, the only thing we know to be true is something coming from something and so it appears something is what exists with no defined beginning(except the observable universe)

2. If there is something, there was something, there had always been something.

True as we(science) can tell.. Apart from the known universe.

3. And for everything that is evidently existing, there must be an origin that

i. isn't bound by space nor by time

Everything we know to exist is bound by space and time, sorry
Your assertion is false..

ii. exist without the dependence on anything else {totally self sufficient}

What verified object matches this description that we know is real and can ascertain its existence?
This is another assumption put into your logic.

iii. Must be able to produce anything other than itself.

We don't even know what the something that always existed is, nor if it may only make replicas of itself.
This assumption isn't even true in the most part if scrutinized properly... For example, Cats don't produce anything other than Cats.

We live in a cause and effect universe that builds on physical relationships that gives us patterns.

If it doesn't exist, then every something u see should have been nothing.

Again... When we apply something and nothing we fail to realize that it only applies to the object in question, they lose meaning and can't be used to make logical deductions.

For example would you say without the something of Nigeria, that whole area would be "nothing", no land, no country, no soil, no people, nothing at all?

Or that without the something of your birth and existence there would be "nothing", no other human being born to your family, no aunty, no uncle to this new human, nothing at all?

What happens is that things still fill in the metaphorical gap of our idea of "nothing" and only is fulfilled when we mean uniqueness, and even that is thrown out the window of our understanding.

Don't argue this things, if u haven't gone thru the epistles I laid down

Your "epistles" are unsound and lay assumption after assumption to try to insist on even bigger assumptions.
Nothing is not a physical state of anything, it is a term we've used to associate the lack of a predefined thing and without that something... You can't remove things from existence into a state of nothing as nothing has never been known to be a state of anything.

It's human nature, contrary to what many people think, the brain prioritizes sex more than food and will give you more than twice the pleasure and attention to sex.

The more members of the opposite sex are around you, the more you want to have sex.

Gaspardd:
I have no biz with my bae's fone and she doesnt av any biz with mine.
One time bae left her fone beside me, she came back 3hrs later to see that her fone was untouched and she made a remark that she knew i wudnt touch her fone.

Aya..

Better to be the delayed ejaculation type than the 1 minute wonder..

1Dray:
Were you planning to renew it on Netsol at the renewal rate of $34?

Yes..

My uba mastercard and visa card doesn't work on netsol, don't know why.. Any solution guys? My domain is 2 days to expire and I'm unable to renew it.