₦airaland Forum

9jafetish:
i don't want to be alone and i want to show my parents i am mature , they still treat like a baby my whole family babies me.

they all still treat me like a kid

if i get married that will show them

OgidiBoy:
If I was You, I'll stay away from the down town area and watch it in the comfort of your house. I remember those days when the Red River (OU)

night used to be fun to go to and hang out all night at the West end till the gangs from South Dallas took over. And none of those fools even go to college

JeSoul:
Lol. Food stamps ke? A whole you? No be king size dream machine you talk say you dey sleep on? Tickets aren't that bad now. LA fans are the ones being gouged at those ungodly prices. As long as you're willing to sit in the balcony you should be able to get reg season games from around $50 bucks, some even less - that's only a couple bottles of the cost of your vodka.

debosky:
did not face Abramovich's billions, nor Citeh's Arab lucre. The comparison in that sense is irrational. The only period that can be reasonably compared with is the period between 97 and 2004, before Abramovich's billions started kicking in.

Wrong - we are talking about one of the strongest leagues in Europe and not minnow leagues.

The fact is that within 97-2004, Arsene won 3 titles and 3 FA cups. In the period since, Arsenal has had to grapple with a financial constraints associated with building the stadium, the effects of which are still being felt due to the long term commercial deals negotiated years ago.

I repeat, the period 2005-2011 cannot be compared to any other in the history of English football. The sheer amount of money that is available to rivals in the league is such that the competition to win is unprecedented.

While there are legitimate reasons to demand more from Wenger and his side, the unassailable truth is that, compared to his rivals, the expenditure gap is telling.

coogar:
contradiction. arsenal have beaten big european giants in europe. . . .inter milan, ac milan, sevilla, juventus, porto, real madrid, etc.

any team can fluke it to the cup final and win. a team has to be good to win the league. the measure of a good side is how well they do in a 38-match league system. a system where everyone in it faces the same competition.

these wins aren't just against minnows. arsenal have punished big teams in europe - a fact you are aware of.

they could win it next season.

coogar:
european competition is a knock out format. . . .which means a careless loss = elimination. the league is different! one can lose 5-6 games and still win the league. arsenal have beaten several european teams in the past to justify my claim that they are good enough to win top european leagues with their style of play.

debosky:
No one is begrudging 's achievement in the UEFA Cup. However, it was the only bright spot in a club on the decline.

As anyone will tell you, the best measure of a side is its final placement in the league table.

Fact is that we were averaging finishing 7th and went to winning doubles with Wenger.

Arsenal is a big club without a doubt, so is Newcastle.

Wenger is the problem and has won the most trophies with Arsenal? That doesn't sound right to me - the issues are at board level.

surely, wenger has a backroom staff. wenger has scouts all over the globe. i don't think it's something to do with the board. wenger has all the faults.
he wants to assemble a team of players who play in a certain kind of way. the kind of way that is not really suited to the english league. i keep saying arsenal in another continental league will be winning the league easily - but not here. even the invincibles had some grit and some dirty players. these current players of nasri, cesc and arshavin are specialists. . . .they only know how to play football in one way and you need many ways to win the league in engand.

ThiefOfHearts:
Garbage

REALITY101:
They better enjoy the first and last Championship of their life because we ~Los Angeles Lakers~ are coming for them next season.