Dejilg's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Dejilg's Profile › Dejilg's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 (of 16 pages)
When Joseph woke from sleep, he did as the angel of the Lord commanded him: he took his wife, but knew her not until she had given birth to a son. And he called his name Jesus. Matthew 1:24-25 ESV Any catholic here to tell us what dis verse is saying? |
Annaka: mtcheeeeeeew u nid help urgently 4rm vatican city,i tot i was talkin 2 a sane personSee a supposed sane person. Hurl insults at me for showing ur catholic lies! Vatican city only helps wen its crusade style! I dnt need their help. They aren't God nor God's people!-----try to act like a sane person. Only God can help, not vatican city |
POPE II: You don't make sense broWow! Dude, u had too much drugs dis morning! Now let me use ur reasoning! Who created Islam? Ask a muslim I asked u to prove that Peter is d first pope and all u cud do is assume Jesus created d catholic church? Where is ur proof?........most pathetic of ur statement is d fact that u now make d burden of proof on me! Dude u r d one tryin to cleanse ur church to me, not d oda way arnd. So d burden of proof rests on ur shoulder. Do it! Like I said, wake up! |
clefstone: The mystery of the Bible is difficult to understand when u pick up verses in isolation. It's even more difficult to understand it if you don't know God and understand his majesty. Unlike you nd me, God does not live in time nd in him there is no distinction between past, present and future. The prophesy of Rev 3:15 is actually the first prophesy of the coming of Christ. Like Isaiah said, ''who would have believed what we now report'', no one wud undastnd what that prophesy implied until Mary comes into d picture since man, unlike God, depend on time for things to be revealed. Notice that God kept on referring to eve as the woman. Notice also that Christ(God made flesh) kept on referring to his mother, Mary as woman. As was first said by Justin Martyr nd later expounded by Irenaeus, Mary is the new Eve. So wen our timeless God looked at Eve, he was talking to that woman who will come in time to bear his son(Rev 3:15) as well as the one that caused his son Adam to disobey him(Rev 3:16).Dude am tired of curing ur Ignorance, only Jesus will help u. U misrepresent me all d time, I asked a simple question. "Show me where Jesus said Mary is His Mother"..........now u claim Jesus never said He is d son of David.....pls explain Rev 22:16 to us! To show ur never ending ignorance and desperation u connected Jesus word of "woman" with God calling "the woman" of Genesis? Dude are u being serious about how ignorant u r? Perhaps check my post again! Expound on the curse being laid on "the woman" first and later let's dive in to d prophecy! Mr. Wrong catholic picked...hahaahahahahahaha |
Annaka: if u r proud of ur church why dont u go ahead and tel us d name instead of beaten around d bushIt is Sola Scriptura anti catholic ministry! Are u happy now? |
clefstone: From your first premise i.e sola scriptura, you make all your arguement invalid. If u believe only those tins found in d bible, i ask again, is it in the Bible that d Bible is an exclusive book of instruction? So whr did u get that from? Not from d Bible i'm sure. It therefore means that judging by your own belief, you r living a lie.When I say u reason like a fowl, u just make it obvious, show us proof that Catholic is the church Christ spoke about. If am to believe ur so called tradition, den why dnt I or u believe Mormons about their own teachings too ![]() See I don't blame u, u just don't read ur Bible. What did Paul mean wen he said that "if anyone, even an angel should preach 'another gospel' to u, let him be accursed"...what does dis mean? Like I said, show us ur marian doctrine from d Bible...which u hv failed from all u v been typing since...stop dodgin facts and propagating hoax that ur church propagates!!! Show us proofs. As a matter of fact ur church is preaching another gospel. None of the apostles mention anythin relating to Mary as "co redemptrix"..... So is ur church not preaching anoda gospel? Like I said, ur catholic(universal or not - dude stop d word play) ddnt even declare the canon as scripture wholly until its 4th council meeting. So what books have Christians been using before den?!! Dude ur church is not "THE CHURCH - the Body of Christ - followers in truth n spirit" --- again dis shows ur marian doctrine false, why isn't Mary in d chain? Dude, until u start givin proofs I will stop taking u seriously! dnt make claims u n ur catholic church can't back! Show us Peter is d first pope. Like I said, if it were true, it shldnt be hard to do. |
clefstone: you r tryin so hard but stil gettin it all wrong. First of all, i didnt write anytin to suggest tht Jesus said Mary is His mother in Matthew, well he didn't need to cos evrybody knew she was. 2ndly, wen Christ was about to die, he said to John, ''son behold your Mother'' and Mary went to live with John from tht moment. If Mary had other sons and daughters i doubt it if that wud hv bin possible. 3rdly, Luke 3 traces Christ's geneology through Joseph and not Mary and see wht it had to say, ''He was the son, SO IT WAS THOUGHT, OF Joseph, the son of Heli. 4thly, Jesus called Mary woman for a reason. Note, Jesus' life was a fulfilment of the old testament. Now, in Gen 3:15, it is written, ''I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offsprings and hers, He will crush your head and you will strike his heel''. Who is d woman you may ask? The quickest ansa tht will come to mind is Eve. But look again. Wen it mentioned the offsprings of the woman it was in singular form, 'HE' and not 'they'. Now who is the offspring of the woman, who is d HE? If the HE is Jesus, d woman becomes who? Then wen u read about Jesus callin his mother woman you should undastnd that He was fulfillin that prophecy. Match this with Revelation 12 and u will get greater insight.Wow dude! I guess u needed to look again! U now assume that Mary z d one d verse is talking about! Pls while u r free to use ur marian church to interprete d verse, I am free to use the Bible itself! Is Jesus Eve's OFFSPRING or not Secondly, if its obvious that the verse talks about Mary, why did ur church have to remove the "he" from the verses and insert "she" Pls quote the catholic translations for us. Do us the favour!If its not playin on ur intelligence, why did ur church switch translations Again, the text is talking about Eve's Offspring, just the same abt the snake's offspring too...or do u wanna tell us a particular snake abt the time of Jesus dat He bruised? Let me even quote the verses for u. The Bible explains itself clearly, but u r misrepresenting it. Gen 3:15-16 15 I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and her offspring; he shall bruise your head, and you shall bruise his heel." 16 To the woman he said, "I will surely multiply your pain in childbearing; in pain you shall bring forth children. Your desire shall be for your husband, and he shall rule over you." From the above, verse 16 tells us about the woman being addressed in vs 15....it was Eve, God cursed her as well, or is it only Mary that went through childbearing in pain? So if it started from Eve, then why can't vs. 15 be addressing Eve, since the whole world (those alive and dead) all came forth from Adam n Eve. Then are we not Her offsprings ??Dude, dnt force ur doctrine on what the passage never said!!! Now u talked about Jesus' command to John about Mary, again why ddnt Jesus called her "My mother"? Since Jesus wdnt hesistate to say He is David's Son, why ddnt He do d same about Mary ![]() |
clefstone: Ignorance in high places. What makes a Catholic? You love d early Church fathers nd agree wit their teachings yet u deny Marian theology. Unfortunately here are some facts to show the early father's recognised Mary as very special.Again u show ur lack of sensibility! Calling Mary the New Eve, followed from the Bible called Jesus the Second Adam!!! Dude are u serious, so u can't get facts?? Now who denied Mary being a virgin wen she conceived Jesus? Did I dispute that? Now I want u to show me wea d early Church fathers, pray to Mary! Pls cite it! Pls! Let's discuss, it! Show me the catholic parallels! U do realise how hard am tryna cure u from being ignorant Show us the "catholician honouring of Mary" by the early church fathers! |
Annaka: oo pls shut up,we r only answerable 2 God,its non of ur biznes if we r honourin mary or notSo pained right? well for the souls of those u wanna lead astray, I won't shut up!!! Try a harder insult, maybe it will make all dis truths go away |
Annaka: I AM PROUDLY CATHOLIC,wot of u which CORNER SIDE church do u attend?Well the corner side Church that is the narrow way to Heaven...do u remember Jesus' own words? Matthew7:13-14 13 "Enter by the narrow gate. For the gate is wide and the way is easy that leads to destruction, and those who enter by it are many. 14 For the gate is narrow and the way is hard that leads to life, and those who find it are few. So am proud its a corner Church for few do find it! U can go to ur "Wall street" church! Destruction is at the end of it |
POPE II: Jesus------> GodShameless catholics! Goin against the direct command of Jesus and u say I shld be grateful Come on! U shld be ashamed, do u know how many ppl hv been led astray by this ur church history?I know u wud also want me to be grateful that ur church killed d Reformers for translating the latin vulgate into other languages! U hv a sick n twisted ideology there my friend! While I agree that Jesus is God... Now he claims to "debunk" me by claiming the hoax abt Peter being the first pope, I will ask u for proof that Peter is actually "catholic" or the "first pope" or even "pope" at all. We have letters n proofs for James the Brother of the Lord heading the Coptic Christians of Egypt...what proof of Peter do u mythical and hoax spreading catholics have and that Jesus is "catholic"....infact Jesus calls catholic church the "LovePeddler" which has left her husband (Jesus)...shame ur church has now followed the "queen of heaven" ---- the very pagan goddess that is now been paraded as Mary for u. Now he talks abt the cross? Dude, u amaze me! So anytime I see a "+" sign, I shld be grateful to ur church? Dude get over urself! I dnt use cross, got nothing of it in my house...so why shld I be grateful? Only the name "Jesus" is enough for me...not cross or any catholic shit! Dude wake up!!! |
clefstone: with all due respect, you don't argue intelligently. You just copied and pasted wikipedia without reading through nd matching it wit d topic. When Paul wrote tht d Holy Scriptures were written for all as u rightly quoted, was he referring to d NT texts which were not even written then? My brother, that there are 27 books of the new testament, with 4 gospel accounts is a Church dogma. Yes, the ultimate decision was influenced by d writings of the early church fathers but even these writing had some discrepancies with each other. For example, if u go back to read wikipedia, u will discover that some did not believe Revelation to be scripture, some did not consider some pauline letters as written by St. Paul. But it was when the Church(notice i try to avoid using Catholic) made it a canon that those 27 books began to be seen universally as d books of the NT. I am only using this as an example to show the authority of the Church. And it is significant that it is not written anywhr in scripture that the Bible is an exclusive document of instruction. As 'Catholics' we believe in sacred tradition, scripture and divine revelation. We believe that everytin in d Bible is true but we also hv other sources of inspiration.Dude I never quoted wikipedia, u just scored a zero point! Dude are u so blind and naïve? Some ddnt consider Revelations to be scripture, doesn't mean u catholics gave it authority of scripture like u claim. The early church fathers quoted from it and hence sees it as scripture probably over time wen they reach a decision. Now u said wen paul said that the scriptures was written for all..., the NT wasn't in existence(any part of it)? Show us proof! Dude why reasoning like a fowl? Did the catholic church give us the OT? Isn't that purely Jewish scriptures of Judaism? What has dis gotta do with Catholics, if as u claim the NT wasn't written wen paul wrote? How does dis meant ur church gave us the scripture? Wow actually u cud speak a lil bit of truth! The Church not catholic made it canon, infact u catholics ddnt make it canon quickly, u had to wait till d 4th council...so how come u can fight dat u gave us scripture (NT)? Again we reject all ur man made "traditions and doctrines, and non Biblical revelations"....u can go ahead with them! But since its not in d Bible, I won't practice it. so I hope u acknowledge these facts as u hv stated that "its tradition" that makes our worlds separate. If any doctrine of urs is in Scriptures, we would accept, if not, we won't! Thank u. And please argue intelligently!!! The early church fathers did what they had to do, since its was necessary to authenticate books that were written in order to know its credibility. So the issue of Revelations is of such, examples like Hebrews, James etc too. Stop hastily catholicizin everythin!!! |
POPE II: Jesus was Catholic.Wow! He said my hate could blind me...well pays off than my naiveness blinding me to the truth of the Bible and historical facts! Easter n Christmas aren't celebrated by me and my family as well as many Christians in the world, so how are we supposed to be grateful for dis ur pagan repackaged holidays !Secondly Jesus wasn't catholic, why lying through ur teeth (so to speak; if speaking).....dude come up with a better lie! Before catholicism, wea dea no Christians or Churches Are u dumb or just naïve?Call us heretics, u r right, since we do not follow ur man made doctrines, but follow the Bible only! Not some stupid church tradition! |
POPE II: THE SAME WORDS WE GAVE YOU ?No, u ddnt give anyone anything! The early church fathers predated catholicism, quoted extensively from the NT so much dat we can construct the NT with exception of 11 verses which bear no doctrinal issues! So if these early church fathers, whom are even model for us and ur so called church quoted from these NT books, how come u r d one who gave us the words !!!Perhpas u shld scroll up to see my earlier posts regarding d issue of canon of NT. |
POPE II: ^^ get a lifeSo is the response from a battered person!!! Go get a statue!!! |
clefstone: You keep on running in circles. You claimed Mary is not Mother of God because Jesus did not call her mother. However, on multiple occassions d Bible author referred to her as his mother and the people of his time called Mary his mother just like the blind man called him the Son of David as u cited. Don't even try to use d passage he said ''my mother and my brothers are...........'' cos if u r smart enough u'l know why he said that given d context. Learn hw to undastnd d scripture in context instead of reading a line nd thinking its ur eureka moment.I dnt know where u kept ur glasses! Now show me where I typed or insinuated "Mary is not the Mother of God, becos Jesus ddnt say Mary is His Mother...! Show me! Simple show us where Jesus said Mary is His mother, dats all I asked for. U catholics are such bad liars, u cudnt show what I asked from the Bible, now u turn to commit fallacy and throw out red herrings! I only pointed to the fact that Jesus ddnt consider His relationship with Mary as important as that of David...what cnt u get here? Since u catholics say its because Mary z Jesus' Mother, dats why u "honour" her, I hv challenged u to show us from the Bible if Jesus made any reference to her that portrays her being able to pray for u. Like I said, Jesus made mention of David as His ancestor according to the flesh, while he made no mention of Mary at all. Simple challenge, prove otherwise! Stop misrepresenting me!.....I dnt wanna call u a liar! But u fit well for one Again u claim that "my mother and my brothers are"....u claim this "mother" in d verse of Matthew refers to Mary! Dude are u dis desperate? Let me post the surrounding context, since u really like context but here u failed to keep ur advice! Matthew 12:46-50 Jesus’ Mother and Brothers 46 While Jesus was still talking to the crowd, his mother and brothers stood outside, wanting to speak to him. 47 Someone told him, “Your mother and brothers are standing outside, wanting to speak to you.” 48 He replied to him, “Who is my mother, and who are my brothers?” 49 Pointing to his disciples, he said, “Here are my mother and my brothers. 50 For whoever does the will of my Father in heaven is my brother and sister and mother.” This verses shows Jesus saying that "My Mother is anyone that does the will of My Father" and He even points to His Disciples in this regard and not Mary!......why are u desperate? Now u hv just shot ur catholic stage of Mary having no other children, since this verse says Jesus' mother and brothers are outside, while His Disciples are with Him. Again who are dis brothers? Perhaps u will talk about brotherhood in jewish thinkin! Mind u, this ppl calling out to Jesus for His mother are jews too! So given ur "brotherhood in jewish thinkin" holds! How are the Gospel writers supposed to relate this story if it were to be His very own siblings? Tell us how they would hv reported it. Wow my eyes caught ur foolishness! So if Jesus wasn't related to Joseph in the flesh, so He can't be related to David? Wait are u a Chrisitan? Ok, let's put dat aside? What abt Jesus' genealogy through Mary, found in Luke 3:23-38? Or is dat one too a failed attempt?! Infact u dnt even know the mystery of why Jesus considers His relationship to David more important than Mary's.....jewish people in Jesus' time understood dat the Messiah is to be from the line of David, even more so through his Son Nathan, from which Mary is descended, but Nathan had no child and Solomon had to marry his wife and raise children for Nathan! hence the tree up to David, on Joseph's side, Jesus can be rightfully crowned King because Joseph is a direct descendant of Solomon and David!.....dude how much of ur ignorance do I need to cure??! Even on this issue of Jesus' virgin birth, just check the thread, I hv explained why it was necessary for Jesus to hv such birth, and why Mary immaculate conception is a hoax and has nothing to do with Jesus' Divinity and coming to earth!....wake up from ur slumber I kindly advice u to stop misrepresenting the Bible based on a man made doctrine of catholicism! |
ChickRockz: You seem to be an atheist...God help you..you really need it...Anyway,Sex crimes or not.The Vatican didn't pay Time Magazine to get this award...And who said they are not trying to apprehend and excommunicate such priests..The Church already has too much on their plate..If you were in the Pope's shoes I'd like to see you take on and handle all the cases he handles in a single day..remember Rome was not built in a day..that the case of the Ambassador was not handled immediately does not mean it would never be handled..Did you even bother to ask why he was recalled....Haven't you heard of Diplomatic Immunity? Diplomats and Ambassadors are NOT tried in the countries where they are guilty of offences but are handed over to their native country for trial...stop making ignorant statementsU seem to bounce forth and back!!! What's on d church's plate? Perhaps u can tell us. Immunity? So now the priests hv become political leaders? Come on dear. Why not call a spade a spade! Ur priests are all over the place committing crimes and ur church protects them. Perhpas ur church sees the problem its creating by making "bishops, priest, nun etc" to be singles for life. Did d Bible command dis doctrine of celibacy? No! If u disagree, show us! Now u claim is it not "illegal" now, and ur church is tryin to apprehend such priests, u knw it doesn't have to be d pope goin on d search, so hw is dis a hard task? Perhaps listenin to news and reading the dailies isn't a catholic thing! This issue of rape is supposed to hv been illegal since "God knows wen".....so y is it recent? Smh4u Catholics! Here u are condemnin Okotie for Divorce, but ur priests gets leverage for child molestation! Gay. n Lesbian folks |
Its funny how some people think oh! (sometimes like d sole of a mad man's shoe though)....wat has winning a man of the year award by "Pope Francis" got to do with Okotie or his comments? So now wen someone receives an award, the person automatically gets Jesus' certification? Smh! Chris Okotie spoke against the Catholic Church (Catholicism) and the Pope (including past and popes to come)...not d person of Pope Francis... Why cnt people use their brains for once? |
clefstone: Usurping authority? Who established the Bible as an authority; d Church or d Bible itself. Where in d Bible is it written that a book of authority be compiled? Who compiled d Bible and gave it authority? Is it documented in the Bible that any idea outside it is false? |
clefstone: Usurping authority? Who established the Bible as an authority; d Church or d Bible itself. Where in d Bible is it written that a book of authority be compiled? Who compiled d Bible and gave it authority? Is it documented in the Bible that any idea outside it is false?Thirdly, it cannot be proven that the Catholic Church is solely responsible for the gathering and selection of the New Testament books. In fact, it can be shown that the New Testament books were gathered into one volume and were in circulation long before the Catholic Church claims to have taken its action in 390 at the council of Hippo. In the following we list some of the catalogues of the books of the Bible which are given by early Christian writers. 326. Athanasius, bishop at Alexandria, mentions all of the New Testament books. 315-386. Cyril, bishop at Jerusalem, gives a list of all New Testament books except Revelation. 270. Eusebius, bishop at Caesarea, called the Father of ecclesiastical history, gives an account of the persecution of Emperor Diocletian whose edict required that all churches be destroyed and the Scriptures burned. He lists all the books of the New Testament. He was commissioned by Constantine to have transcribed fifty copies of the Bible for use of the churches of Constantinople. 185-254. Origen, born at Alexandria, names all the books of both the Old and New Testaments. 165-220. Clement, of Alexandria, names all the books of the New Testament except Philemon, James, 2 Peter and 3 John. In addition we are told by Eusebius, who had the works of Clement, that he gave explanations and quotations from all the canonical books. 160-240. Turtullian, contemporary of Origen and Clement, mentions all the New Testament books except 2 Peter, James and 2 John. 135-200. Irenaeus, quoted from all New Testament books except Philemon, Jude, James and 3 John. 100-147. Justin Martyr, mentions the Gospels as being four in number and quotes from them and some of the epistles of Paul and Revelation. Besides the above, the early church fathers have handed down in their writings quotations from all the New Testament books so much so that it is said that the entire New Testament can be reproduced from their writings alone. Thus, the New Testament books were in existence in their present form at the close of the apostolic age. As a matter of fact, the apostles themselves put their writings into circulation. "And when this letter has been read among you, see that it be read in the church of the Laodiceans also; and that you yourselves read the letter from Laodicea." (Col. 4:16). "I charge you by the Lord that this epistle be read to all the holy brethren." (1 Thess. 5:27). The holy Scriptures were written for all (1 Cor. 1:2; Eph. 1:1) and all will be judged by them in the last day (Rev. 20:12; John 12:48). Jesus said that His Word will abide forever (Matt. 24:35; 1 Pet. 1:23-25). Peter being the first pope is another catholic myth! Peter ddnt head d church in rome...big hoax! Stop spreading it. Show us proof not word of mouth! |
clefstone: If then David calls him Lord, how can he be His son(Matt 22:44). Jesus rightly called the Father God because while on earth he lowered himself to take the form of man. Since men depended on God, Jesus had to do d same in his human nature. Hence a Apostle Paul wrote, ''though his nature was divine, he did not cling to his equality with God, a thing to be grasped. Thr is no corelationship between David/Christ nd Father/Christ relationships.Now I know u r a catholic and not a Christian and u dnt know ur Bible, I quoted Rev 22:16 to u and yet u pretend not to see it... Luke 18 37 They told him, "Jesus of Nazareth is passing by." 38 And he cried out, "Jesus, Son of David, have mercy on me!" 39 And those who were in front rebuked him, telling him to be silent. But he cried out all the more, "Son of David, have mercy on me!" 40 And Jesus stopped and commanded him to be brought to him. And when he came near, he asked him, 41 "What do you want me to do for you?" He said, "Lord, let me recover my sight." Here did Jesus questioned being called Son of David?? And what gave the man d impression that Jesus is David's Son? Seems u only read dat part of the Bible ur priests wants u to read. Did u read d Geneology of Christ? If so, why ask, how Jesus is David's Son according to the flesh? To answer ur question abt Jesus asking d Jews how come David called Him Lord. Read Rev 22:16....Jesus is d "root" i.e Creator/Sustainer of David and also has descended through David's lineage! How come u dnt know dis ? Are u being dishonest with Biblical truth? Or u r doin what ur priests asked u to? |
clefstone: If then David calls him Lord, how can he be His son(Matt 22:44). Jesus rightly called the Father God because while on earth he lowered himself to take the form of man. Since men depended on God, Jesus had to do d same in his human nature. Hence a Apostle Paul wrote, ''though his nature was divine, he did not cling to his equality with God, a thing to be grasped. Thr is no corelationship between David/Christ nd Father/Christ relationships.Now I know u r a catholic and not a Christian and u dnt know ur Bible, I quoted Rev 22:16 to u and yet u pretend not to see it... Luke 18 37 They told him, "Jesus of Nazareth is passing by." 38 And he cried out, "Jesus, Son of David, have mercy on me!" 39 And those who were in front rebuked him, telling him to be silent. But he cried out all the more, "Son of David, have mercy on me!" 40 And Jesus stopped and commanded him to be brought to him. And when he came near, he asked him, 41 "What do you want me to do for you?" He said, "Lord, let me recover my sight." Here did Jesus questioned being called Son of David?? And what gave the man d impression that Jesus is David's Son? Seems u only read dat part of the Bible ur priests wants u to read. Did u read d Geneology of Christ? If so, why ask, how Jesus is David's Son according to the flesh? To answer ur question abt Jesus asking d Jews how come David called Him Lord. Read Rev 22:16....Jesus is d "root" i.e Creator/Sustainer of David and also has descended through David's lineage! How come u dnt know dis ? Are u being dishonest with Biblical truth? Or u r doin what ur priests asked u to? |
Annaka: i pray u dont die of high bp becos of catholic churchLolzzz do u care dat much Perhaps if u do, pray to Mary so she can make me not get high bp na |
clefstone: You keep twisting d Bible to foster ur anti-Catholic agenda. Where in d Bible did Jesus call himself son of David? Please read Matt 22:42-46 to correct your lies.Why dnt u tell us what's in Matt 22:42-46 and hw it supports ur case? Now how does dis refute the fact that Jesus is David's Son? Jesus is asking them that if David calls Him Lord how then is He his Son? How is dis fact twisting? You as a catholic believe Jesus is God (I do too)...how den did Jesus call the Father God ? Does dis sound familiar? Answer it and let's see who is twisting Biblical facts...are u dis so confused? Well let's look at Jesus' statement in Revelations 22:16 16 "I, Jesus, have sent my angel to testify to you about these things for the churches. I am the root and the OFFSPRING of David, the bright morning star." Now don't u hv dis in ur Bible? Or did I twist dis in mine? Infact this statement answers the question of why David calls Jesus His Lord n Jesus cud stil say He is David's Son. Jesus is David's Son according to the flesh! Why is dis hard for u? Are u no longer a Christian? |
alextayo: It is very obvious that you are suffering from crude ignorance and gross unpopularity syndrome and you are just looking for cheap popularity by attacking the Catholic Faith...We Catholics have decided to ignore like a contingent being(if you understand what that means and i bet you wont ...unless you visit google).Yh Yh tell us more abt ignoring all dat I hv typed on this thread...so far so good, none of u catholic liars hv been able to defend the man made Marian devotion I dnt need popularity, perhaps ur church does, like it did before the reformation, by usurping absolute authority to overturn real Biblical doctrines for dea man made money thrivin doctrines! |
maclatunji: It is a fact that Christians don't worship God like Jesus did. And again I ask who was Jesus worshipping?Now he says its a fact that we dnt worship like Jesus did...can u show us what d difference in worship is ??Jesus is worshipping the Father...now u wanna force ur idea of a unitarian miniaturized god of quran to that of the Bible? Sori, u can try, but all I see is failure |
maclatunji: Thank you for continually exposing your ignorance, I can see you are pained by the fact that it has been proven that the way Jesus (AS) worshipped is identical to Muslim's Solat and you Christians simply do not do that. Like I said, the point is made but Islam as perfected by Prophet Muhammad (SAW) goes beyond what Jesus did or did not do. We just have to come down to your elementary level to help you out of your arrogant ignorance.Actually u have ur ignorance abt what I just posted! Can u show us the teaching of Jesus in the quran ![]() Since u have assumed I dnt have one and I dnt knw anythin abt Islam!!! Again u assumed that Christians dnt pray or worship like Jesus did...I knw u weren't blind wen I typed dat u shld go to mounts and see how the ppl dere pray/worship! Infact islamic worship/prayer contradicts Jesus' teaching over and over again. The only claim for muhammed is found in the quran. So its funny hw u muslims try to justify islam by the quran and quran by islam...just circular reasoning! As far as u know! Judaism dnt believe in the NT and Christians have shown dem dat Jesus and all the NT teachings are rooted in OT. Not a circular reasoning method u muslims have adopted. Even ur efforts for showin muhammed in the Bible has proved wasteful and useless! |
maclatunji: @bolded, HAHAHAHAHAAHAAAAAA! It really must be hard to be outpunched to the point of stupor. Go forth and study Islam properly before trying to debate. At the moment, you do not even understand Christianity which you profess.I really cnt believe some ppl have got their brains fried! So now I have showed him Jesus never prayed like muslims do...and he now says they aren't bound to pray like Jesus did...? So why did u den say Jesus prayed like a muslim?? Let's put aside d fact of the logical errors here! Since Jesus predates Islam... Again ignorance is d very essence of dis islamists! Its a shame dat He suddenly got blind and cudnt see that I posted that the actual words Jesus used in His prayers makes it difficult for his claim that Jesus prayed like a muslim...."Do u muslims call allah "Father" while praying?" Now he is tryin to enlighten me that Christmas is a fraud... Well I knew dat right from wen I have know my left from my right! Am nt ignorant like u. And to say I believe God is a white man, kinda funny! Well I dnt even have any pics depicting Jesus, either in my house, computer or fone! Address real issues and stop attacking fantasy! And if u claim I shld study islam well... Can u tell us what dis means without hiding its real facts "salallahu alehyi wasalam" ---- do an analysis of this common sentence u say everyday! Now we are told that Jesus' teaching has been corrupted. can u please show us this corruption and the real teachings of Jesus. So now even if one doesn't pray by prostrating, one can still be a muslim? So why do u have to say Jesus prostrating or bowing while praying means He is prayin like a muslim Why cnt muslims reason? This claim of corruption of the message of Jesus has been a long lie told by islamist, we aren't gettin any new debating tactics of islamists anymore. And they hv all left the questioned unanswered, where is the real teaching of Jesus?! So far, how many statements of Jesus is in the quran? |
maclatunji: I hereby nominate this post for the "Ignorant Post of the Year" award because what Muslims are to perform is 5 daily Solat which is exactly worship. Prayer in Arabic is "Dua'a" corrupted to "Adua" in Yoruba or "Adura" in the urban version.Again this is sheer islamic/muslim desperation! Many Christians worship anyway by prostrating, u can go to the mounts sef. Does this means they are doin it islamically? The book of Nehemiah predates islam, so even muslims are the ones copying judaism. Now agreed Jesus bowed/prostrated and pray, but pls what did Jesus say in His prayer? Did He mentioned "allah" or "Father"? Did he say salallahu alehyi wasalam"? So I plead with u to drop ur ignorance at ur door steep so the fowls around ur area can see how foolishly u think by saying prayer positions instead of content defines an islamic prayer or not. Or do u say a cripple can't pray to allah? Since a cripple myt nt be able to prostrate?! So who is with ur award now? Use ur brain! |
harbiola1: What verse?Now harbiola, u have just displayed ignorance on ur part due to desperately tryin to portray muhammed n islam in d Bible.... Zechariah 13:1 English Standard Version (ESV) 13 “On that day there shall be a fountain opened for the house of David and the inhabitants of Jerusalem, to cleanse them from sin and uncleanness This verse shows the unconditional sacrifice made by Jesus...its not becos we agreed to being cleansed that Jesus came to die for us, its becos God chose this part! And u r being ignorant or delibrately lying by assuming that during Jesus' life time on earth, only the 12 Apostles believed on Him....even today we have Messianic Jews and a growing number of them believing in Jesus Christ. So dis verse can be understood as not being conditioned to those that ddnt "murder" Him nor those dat did...since the latter could still repent and be cleansed. Yes Messianic Jews stopped the daily sacrifices as they know that all d previous sacrifices are a pointer to the sacrifice of Jesus on the cross...and if u say Christians are heretic for not sacrificing, then are u muslims sacrificing? Perhaps u will say "yes"...then we shall discuss it. Jesus did celebrated the Jewish festivals because like He said, "He came to fufil the Law" --- no one before and after Jesus had been able to do dis perfectly. And hence the Law couldn't nt justify anybody...only Faith in Jesus who did it perfectly can justify...... And lastly u quoted Acts 3:1...but failed to tell us the whole incident if indeed Peter and John went to pray there. Everyone shld note that this verse never said that they went there to "Pray" but only told us the time they went there....and moreover reading on shows that these 2 Disciples went there to Preach Jesus and do miraculous works so d Jews might believe in Jesus Christ. Afterall Jesus did preached in the temple for long days, so why wudnt His Disciples do the same even after receivin the command to witness for Him "beginning at Jerusalem". They probably chose the temple as meeting ground because at "Prayer times" many of the Jews wud be gathered there and a lot of people seeking healing would come to the temple. And all should note that dis Disciples preaching is not in unity with that of the Jews. Also these events happened after they have received power and encouragement (after the day of Pentecost) Harbiola does dis prayer times equate to dat of islam? And is d content of prayer d same?! Do u observe the Jewish Sabbath Sacrifice the way they do? Call on YHWH? Etc! Unlike u muslims, Christians are open to criticize the Bible in order to see the truth, but u muslims dare not as it cud be shirk and allah myt nt forgive u. Ur mullahs and imaam have blinded u. Pastors hold no authority over Biblical meaning, after the Bible say we should proof all things and hold fast to the "truth". |
Catholics and lies! |
clefstone: See who is looking for Bible proof writing contra-biblical fact. Where is it written tht Jesus considered David as greater than Mary?I have not type "David is greater than Mary" nor anythin of such. Importance doesn't mean greatness...I only said u shld read the Bible and show me where Jesus said Mary is His mother, but instead Jesus refers to the fact that He is David's Son... Hence David is more important as to Jesus' Ministry and Mission compared to Mary....even after Jesus' resurrection and revelation in Glory, He still made no mention of Mary but David...so am not d one who is doin conta-biblical facts. Its u and I hope u wake up from ur slumber. So u can stop following d man made doctrine of catholicism which sees itself higher than the authority of the Bible |
