₦airaland Forum

Pidgin2:
Paul was celibate, Jesus was celibate too. Go and read Corinthians:7 to check why it is recommended for those who want to dedicate their lives to God.

hopefulLandlord:
what you also describe as "sin" has nothing backing it up except a folktale handed down by ancient barbaric tribes who lived in desert Palestine millennia ago

hopefulLandlord:
this is an assertion with no evidence to back it up except a folktale handed down by ancient barbaric tribes who lived in desert Palestine millennia ago

CatfishBilly:
So humans can get vitamin c from fruits because God made it so but cancers and ectopic pregnancies is because of sin?
Clap for yourself Harvey "Two Face" Dent

CatfishBilly:
You still haven't answered the telomeres and failed gene repair and ectopic and abdominal pregnancies in this your Intelligent design.

lepasharon:
Ofcourse it does because a perfect biological system would not risk getting scurvy if it didn't ingest Vit C when it could easily synthesize that Vitamin like other animals do.

To me, God is to be included in science because if he exists, he is a part of the Universe...

lepasharon:
Anyone who thinks critically

lepasharon:
Why don't animals need to do this? Their metabolism produces Vitamin C for them, but humans need to ingest Vit C. Thats not fair is it?

niftin:
That sabbath day which is the seventh day is of the Jewish religion, we are not Jewish we are Christian. The church which decided to make the Sunday a day of worship and any day for its activities was born after the death and resurrection of Christ through the inspiration of holy spirit. For Christ said what ever this church obtains on earth is considered obtained in heaven and what it lose on earth is lost in heaven. The jews do not recognise Christ as the son of God. So whoever is following what date they fix is actually straying from Christ. Christ is future for which ever nation God chooses to call his own people. Don't be confuse. Do your research and fix your facts together.

dingbang:
chei .. I pity the way u reason .... What do you even think the meaning of pope is ? Does peter have to aknoledge himself as a pope before the church recognizes him as one?

Right there in the front of the apostles, Jesus himself conferred on Peter as the rock of his church... I don't need to argue this with you abeg..

dingbang:
St Peter is the first pope..

lexylexy:
so if it's all d participants, then they should just remove the 25k from my own 300k and pay me 275k after the training. how you see am op

CatfishBilly:
For something to be accepted by science, it has to have a hypothesis at the barest minimum, Intelligent Design proponents don't have that, so they're grouped with Dr. Iguedo and his Goko Cleanser as pseudoscience.

CatfishBilly:
So, the obvious design flaws from birth like inability of humans to synthesize Vitamin C and Folic acid and ectopic and abdominal pregnancies are also the result of sin?

Niflheim:
Did you guys notice in the debate between Ken Ham(master of oloshis) and Bill Nye, Ken Ham was wearing glasses? A man who "believes" in Intelligent Design, wearing glasses to help improve his so-called Intelligently Designed eyesight?

Imagine the bible, talking about a man who was born blind, ONLY FOR THE "EVERLASTING BIBLICAL BUFFOONS" TO TELL US ABOUT INTELLIGENT DESIGN? HOW IS BLINDNESS INTELLIGENT?!!!

4kings:
So what would you say about those that existed according to history during this time the flood is alleged to have happened?

felixomor:
Fallacy of appeal to authority....

ifenes:
I expected you to say that. God is eternal, and uncaused right, so who are you?

realmindz:
The end of the article says it all..

I quote

"So if these clocks are based on faulty assumptions and yield unreliable results, then scientists should not trust or promote the claimed radioactive “ages” of countless millions of years, especially since they contradict the true history of the universe as recorded in God’s Word. "


Another one pls

realmindz:
your intro to this thread was spectacular and captivating, unfortunately, you were over rated.

it's quite disappointing you resort to a quack site to prove a point.
and in the first place, no one said they were perfect but they are by far reliable and gives very good estimate...

So what's your take on the earth's age and please stop quoting a one-man religious bias research...

realmindz:
To say scientists are divided is an exaggeration.

Abiogenic origin of crude oil is still an hypothesis which nevertheless does not in anyway conflict the estimated age of the earth.
The theory even suggests that meteorites must have been responsible for hydrocarbon in billions of years of high temperature and pressure