Dpsychologist's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Dpsychologist's Profile › Dpsychologist's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 (of 112 pages)
Examples of FEMININE LANGUAGE 1. I'm not looking for a relationship right now. TRANSLATED: I don't want a relationship WITH YOU. Don't even BOTHER trying to go out with me since I am saying that a relationship with you and me is already not going to happen. Scenario ; A friend of mine many years back fell in love with a particular girl, she is everything he could ever want in a woman according to him. He asked her out but she told him she is not up to 18 that her parents won't allow her date while underage cos she was just 17. Since my guy truly loves this babe he waited till she was 18. He asked her out again but to his greatest shock she told him she already had a boyfriend at first he taught she was just giving an excuse till he saw evidence. He asked her how Long they have been dating and she said for over 7months. The guy got angry and left. So you see, the girl gave an excuse of not wanting a r/ship before 18 but went ahead and dated another guy. 2. I think of you as a brother! Translated: I would consider sex with you to be incest. My Brother you are in the deepest pit in friendzone. 3. I'm not ready to settle down or I enjoy the single life! Translated : I don't want to settle down with YOU. When ever she says she is not ready she is simply saying she is not ready for you in particular. 4. I need more space! Translated: You're becoming undesirable and unattractive. This is when you WALK AWAY. She might have found someone, she will only come back if things didn't work out between them. I have a thread that goes deeper on this at: https://www.nairaland.com/6052408/feminine-language |
32.) THE FEMININE LANGUAGE : Welcome to womaniverse(woman + universe) — Dpsychologist Just like computer has Programming Languages such as c++, c#, python and many more, It's no surprise that woman speak in another language. Not in the sense that they don't speak the same human language with men but usually their messages are encrypted and until you can decode it, you will remain in a limbo. They are subtle creatures, sneaky, devious, and say things in code, double entendre, parables, wordplay and covert communication(by now i believe you know why) It's time for men to break the code of the feminine language. |
2. The Role of Rationalisation & Sophistry: Whilst solipsism requires greater explanation because of its breadth as “something she is”, rationalisation requires less explanation because it’s merely “something she does.” Rationalisation is the grand act of seeking justification or explanation for something that has occurred in order to flatter/benefit the person who performed the behaviour. It is not an honest attempt to understand what causes a behaviour. Women often do not understand why they feel what they feel, because rationally verbalising primal impulses is difficult if not impossible. She cannot acknowledge that she doesn’t even know why she said or did something as she’ll look stupid. So to save face, she will come up with persuasive nonsense to reconcile the irrationality of her behaviour with the look of something that sounds convincing. To simplify, she will find something that sounds reasonable to explain her behaviour, regardless of whether this is the true cause of said behaviour. As long as it makes her look and feel good, it is a sufficient rationalisation that serves the purpose she needs it to. Women are far less concerned with communicating the truth about themselves than they are maintaining an acceptable image. Again, this is why it is foolish to ask women about women. They’re less interested and incapable of understanding themselves than men are |
The topic of feminine infantile narcissism presents the perfect opportunity to explore why women are more inherently cunning than men. It is because women are all too aware the depth and breadth of assistance they require from the opposite sex is greater than the inverse, and so it is this position in large part which fuels their motive for manipulating as a way of life. Women are in a position of neediness, and yet they cannot fully trust men to give them what they need, so they manipulate men in order to give them what they want, but then resent the men who fall prey to such devices. Even the sweetest, kindest, best raised woman is a cunning creature, for it is in the insecurity due to reliance that she protects herself via the practice of cunning. I believe that where nature gave man superior strength, women were bestowed with cunningness. Infantile as they are, women are ill-equipped to handle power, and that which is born out of the insecurity that a man may do her wrong, turns into an exploitative, predatory misuse of power that fuels grandiose narcissism , and thus masculinises her. The aforementioned relationships between the different aspects of the female psyche do not explain it in its entirety, but nonetheless, should accurately depict its root and core. |
Women with little power and low self-esteem are solipsistic and prone to infantile narcissism, whilst those with high self-esteem and great power are grandiosely narcissistic, the latter meaning they possess a characteristically masculine air of arrogant detachment. Where solipsism is her internal dialogue and mode of thought, its external counterpart is infantile narcissism( women’s insecurity of her relative inferiority to man, and dependence on men) . If one analyses the thinking of the feminist movement for a second, a great part of it fixates on “empowering women by granting them independence.” This suggests a few things, that firstly, women do not possess the ability or desire to take independence for themselves and so need powerful politicians to legally mandate it. And secondly, that the feminist fixation with independence is a macro manifestation of female insecurity. This to say, that women are all too aware of their reliance on men for both economic and emotional support, and that collectively, rather than be grateful for man’s magnanimity, they despise it. Women have always needed men, still do, and most likely always will. Even the women who do well to provide for themselves end up requiring a man who earns more than they, who is mentally stronger than they, and so on. A woman is hypergamous by her very nature, and thus much to the disdain of her insecurity, requires male superiority in order to even find men attractive. |
In juxtaposition, if something negative is said about men, most men can simultaneously weigh up whether the generalisation applies to men as a group, and if it does, if it applies to them. They do not instantly conflate opinions of their sex with opinions of themselves, and so unlike women, are not reflexively offended by negative statements made about their sex if an element of that statement is based in reality. Naive men believe “women must be experts on women, because being women themselves they know all about women!” such a belief is folly(that is why it is wrong to ask for relationship advice from women) , and no more than a reflection of a man’s naivety, for it assumes women are abstractive rather than solipsistic, that is, more interested in the truth than being purposefully ignorant in order to maintain an optimum level of happiness. This couldn’t be further from the truth. When women talk about women, they project rather than investigate because they’re prone to emotional solipsism, not rational investigation. Solipsism is the core base of all female behaviour, it is the intrinsic way of being, the very foundation on which the female’s other psychological aspects spawn. |
If you talk about the general nature of women to a woman, but you do not distinguish between her and “most women”, she will almost always lump herself in with “most women” and fail to make the distinction between herself and women as a whole. This leads her to constantly miss the forest for trees, stating that “she was in a similar situation and she was never like that” when you generalise her sex. Now, whilst it is certainly possible the woman you’re talking to may be the exception to something, it is more likely that she is not but believes in all delusional earnest that she is. Because she follows her feelings, and it feels better for her to believe she’s different than to be aware of her shortcomings, she will believe an aspect of her behaviour immune to generalisation even when her behaviours confirm the generalisation! You may even remember a time when the woman you’re talking to embodied the exact generalisation you’re asserting, and yet like a crazy person with amnesia, she will claim to be nothing like that. This is another “function” of solipsism, a woman’s pre-occupation with the self is mirrored by an utter lack of self-awareness of what said self consists of. And so it is only in the grand denial of a woman’s solipsism that if she believes there’s nothing “wrong” with her, then there’s nothing “wrong” with women either. If she believes she’s not like that , then she incorrectly concludes that most women aren’t like that either. It is the observation that nearly all women will unironically say “not all women are like that” that gives away the feminine’s solipsistic point of reference, that a woman will attempt to differentiate herself as superior when in competition, but should you criticise women in general, suddenly her ability to make distinctions between herself and her group vanishes. |
FEMALE PSYCHOLOGY 1. Solipsism’s Role In Femininity: Much unlike man, who searches for understanding in the external world, a woman’s quest for understanding lies within the emotion of the internal word. Women are not so interested in the quirks and qualities of the abstract world in so much as they are ever perplexed by their emotions. A woman’s opinion of her gender is inseparably tied up with how she sees herself. To simplify: whatever a woman believes to be true of women, is 99 out of 100 times, something she believes to be true of herself. Solipsism leads women to believe the opinions they hold of themselves accurately represent the behaviours generalisable to their sex. Naturally most women are oblivious to their flaws, and are as a matter of ego, unwilling to even ponder the possibility they’re not intrinsically wonderful. Most women do not realise the negative traits they possess should be rectified where possible or otherwise mitigated, because they do not recognise themselves as having said undesirable qualities to begin with. Simply put, women lack self-awareness, they tend to deny their shortcomings rather than fix them, and this is why there is a substantial lack of bodies in the women’s online self-improvement community. |
IMPORTANCE OF THE REDPILL : Men are taught to worship women, whilst women are taught to distrust men. Men are taught to serve women, whilst women are taught to deceive men. Society believes it morally reprehensible for a man to dupe a woman, and yet bares no such disdain when it is reversed. Before the emergence of red pill philosophy, no meaningful infrastructure existed to support and educate men on matters of women, and this is why what we do is crucial. We educate boys and men on matters nobody else is capable of, and support them where nobody else cares. Culturally there is a power imbalance where the masculine has become so weak and the feminine has gotten so out of control, that she threatens to destabilise civilization’s very core with a tyrannic power she is not fit to wield. The red pill (as well as this thread ) does to the extent of its reach, attempt to redress this imbalance by giving men the tools they need to exercise power and remain sovereign. Red pill philosophy is effective, it thoroughly details female behaviour from numerous perspectives (sociologically, evolutionarily and occasionally, economically) to form a rich and comprehensive philosophy. However, having internalised much of this “forbidden knowledge” over the years, I wish to do something I do not believe has been done before: unify the red pill understanding of women into a framework that depicts the relationships between the mechanisms that embody the feminine. You’re going to learn what many men never learn, and what many others pay in pain and poverty to merely intuit. |
31.) UNDERSTANDING FEMALE PSYCHOLOGY : Years ago as a clueless man bereft of the knowledge about women , I would ask men to explain women, I would ask women themselves to explain women, and I would ask Google to explain women. Nobody really knew what they were talking about. The only answers I would get were gynocentric answers from men, women and websites like wikihow and general cliches such as “be yourself” and “be confident”. The problem with the mainstream gynocentric viewpoint is it teaches men how to be a good slave, rather than a good master. It teaches men how to cater to women, rather than how to inspire a woman’s desire to cater to them. It actively suppresses truths related to women, whilst spreading untruth about men. At this point it seems the system would prefer men are useful but ignorant, rather than enlightened and sovereign. Men yearn to understand women, for they wish to attract them, as well as protect themselves from womanly predations. This knowledge is not only quintessential but crucial for the preservation of man’s sanity. And yet quite sadistically, this wisdom eludes most men no matter how earnestly they seek it. Today, life changing truth is only readily available should a man open a thread such as this(thanks to the internet). |
In Nigeria if you are even taller than a police man, you will b arrested
|
Timbers: Dpsychologist: Majority of what i will be posting is an amalgam from various websites, research, books, media, introspection and my personal experience. |
30.) WOMEN ARE WONDERFUL FALLACY: “It is amazing how complete is the delusion that beauty is goodness.” — Leo Tolstoy Nature has armed womankind with beauty . Beauty is the basis on which a successful deception is predicated. Beauty is not only disarming but enticing, its presence aids in the signalling of women’s most favoured illusion – innocence. Man’s naivity is in seeing beauty as virtuous, for in doing so, he sees a woman for who he’d like her to be rather than for who she is. This is the product of the women are wonderful fallacy. The women-are-wonderful fallacy is the predisposition in which t people associate more positive attributes with women than with men. Women are worse in almost any regard just as men Women are frequently regarded as more empathetic, less violent etc., even though they are in truth more likely than men to initiate intimate partner violence, are less cooperative with their own sex, are less generous in high-status positions, report more same-sex conflicts and take longer for conflict resolution, more often than men slut-shame other women, have a stronger anti-female bias in peer review, are more interrupted by other women than by men, more likely to socially exclude. Female gossip has also been a concern throughout history. Throughout history, queens were more likely to wage war than kings, and women are thought to be less loyal to their own group. Most women also love criminals and bad guys( eg Hybristophilia, scelerophilia and stockholm syndrome) . Read more here : https://www.nairaland.com/6077919/women-wonderful-myth |
Good day Redpillers |
If you let her imperative win here within the context of a relationship or even marriage, you’re allowing her to drill nails into the coffin of your romantic arrangement as once you allow such behaviour to become commonplace she has you pegged for a chump. Allowing her to derive benefit from you without requiring sex from her causes her to lose attraction to you as there’s no value exchange. The ability for her to benefit from you without being required to service your needs causes her to lose respect, the dying attraction is often communicated in feminine language as: “ the spark’s just not there anymore“ and thus she will start the cycle all over again with another man, shit testing him to see how easily he’ll give up his commitment to her and then offering her sex to him when he maintains attraction without freely and disposably giving away said commitment to her. |
Using a mans sexual desire for a woman and turning him into a provider for said woman without said woman giving said man any sexual access is exploitative of the mans nature and completely immoral on the behalf of the woman yet this happens all the time and society is perfectly happy to ignore, reinforce and even encourage said behaviour. Men and women are ultimately never equal in part due to the differences in our sexual imperatives let us not forget and the difference in agenda and how it is pursued by each gender is merely one significant indication of these sexually dimorphic differences in mating psychology. The friend zone however is not just a hurdle on the path to getting sex from a woman which magically disappears once sex has been attained, a woman can friend zone you even after having had sex with you and a more cunning woman may use sex as a way to secure your commitment before withdrawing it later on and simultaneously seeing if they can extract emotional commitment and resources from you without having to keep up their end of the bargain . |
Women are aware of why men do things for them, they play dumb but on a machiavellian level they are quite smart, they have high machiavellian intelligence . They play stupid for the sake of appearances so that they can squirm and escape accountability by keeping their hands clean via the employment of plausible deniability, but ultimately a woman with many beta males despite any well-placed display of ignorance she feigns knows full well what she is doing and why she is doing it, the reality of the matter is she just doesn’t care about the needs of the man so long as one or a number of her needs are being met by that man and so as long as he “fulfills his purpose in her life.” She is entirely happy to carry on exploiting his sexual desire of her whilst not reciprocating or giving in to these demands, only implicating the promise of sex to keep him around should he look likes he’s about to leave and throwing him duty sex should she really value his contributions to her life. |
WOMEN ARE SMARTER(cunning) IN THE DATING ARENA Women are exploitative rather can cooperative, they will use their beauty as bait for you to give your commitment without getting anything in return —Dpsychologist In blue pill (every day) society men are made to feel bad for their sexuality, they are scorned for not being a simp( wanting to be used by a woman in the manner which the friend zone in place sets out and often shamed into compliance) , they’re scorned for their sexuality and lustful desire when in reality as a point of justice the ones who should be scorned are the women. It is this same women who ruthlessly use men as “surrogate providers” for their desires and lifestyle choices whilst not providing any return on the services he provides, or doing so begrudgingly or sparingly merely as a manipulative effort to keep him content enough to stick around. Women are notorious for giving “duty sex” or “pity sex” at beta men, the sexual scraps that essentially only the best of the best beta providers can acquire after having provided an inordinate amount of value. Yet again this results in a biased and unfair transaction between man and women even though sex does take place rather she exploits the man. |
JUGGERNAUT'S LAW is the theory that the very most unattractive women receive a surprisingly large amount of attention from men, sometimes more attention than women of average attractiveness. The name of the law derives from the idea that a women's SMV is 'unstoppable' like a Juggernaut. Juggernaut law can be explained by Bateman's principle , female hypergamy, women's lower libido and greater choosiness causing an oversupply of sexually frustrated males. There is a large contingent of men whose approaches have largely consisted of juggernauting , as they feel they have no chance with women they find attractive(hence they go for unattractractive ladies) . |
29.) COMMITMENT IS MORE VALUABLE THAN SEX : Guys are cheap because they don't know their value — Dpsychologist Women need men more than men need women, and women hate this. Men want sex and at some point, a family. Women however seek masculine energy to stabilise their impulsivity, coveting paternal dominance and the sense of safety and stability that rationalism lends. (See section 9.) Just look at single mother households and older single women, they are miserable. Such women need a man to achieve even a semblance of happiness, but men often find these women to be the cause of nothing but misery. The words bachelor and spinster have opposing connotations for a reason, a man’s commitment is his prime commodity. However, because most guys think with their d1ck they end up desperate for sex. I know alot of guys that beg for sex but offer their commiment like water. It is only when something is scarce that it is desired. This results in even an unattractive woman getting all the attention she deserves. This is explained by Juggernaut law. |
UCMax1:Thanks bro Knowledge is not power if it is not shared—Dpsychologist |
Dpsychologist:[color=maroon] Examples of shit test ¶ “Do you believe in love at first sight?!” Translation: Are you a beta? Response: The answer to this should always be no. ¶ “How many girls have you slept with?” Translation: Do you get laid a lot or are you a sex starved beta? Response: Saying you have not slept with any girl communicates low value(male virgins are useless to women) . Exaggerate your number if it’s low. If it’s high reply with : “I’ve lost count.”, “What, today? Not many.”, “Pick a number, any number.” ¶ “Do you have a girlfriend?” – Translation: Are you a beta? (Can you get laid?) Response: The correct answer is always yes (it increases your preselection.) Women love stealing men from other women, they essentially find whatever is “in demand” to be attractive, that’s what we refer to as “preselection.” Response: “she told me not to tell anyone”, “We’re not Facebook official”, “I don’t cuddle her after sex, so no?” ¶ “I bet you have a girlfriend!” Translation: I want to sleep with you but I don’t know if other women find you hot. Response: Again, even if you don’t have a girlfriend, you should say you do or otherwise indicate that you do, to increase your perceived preselection.[/color] |
God will continue revealing all those bitter ladies with their allegations. What did she gain for lying inorder to tanish someone's image. She is reaping whatever she sow. #SayNoToFalseRapeAllegations |
And so? |
ibkonekt:Exactly. As i will always say if you have great LMS you are half way home. |
JasperVII:Glad you are understanding my point. |
ibkonekt:From the thumbnail of the video above who do you think is the Alpha male? Kalatium : ibkonekt :You are both right. With the way you dress and your face, body shape and body language a woman will determine if you are attractive or not. If you do not groom yourself, nor take care of your body. It is game over even before the game starts |
JasperVII:Thanks bro. I am glad to be touching lives |
MrGrimm:I am glad to be Touching someone's life |
28.)WOMEN ARE NOT MYSTERIOUS : They are not confused nor are they mysterious. They communicate differently than we do (i will talk about the Feminine language later) They may be complex but not enigmatic. Their biggest con in human history is to make men believe they are mysterious. For centuries men do not really know women. Men have been going to war leaving women and children, hustling to work from morning to evening leaving their stay at home wives, men studied the world via science, invented alot. Men were busy doing other things but never cared to study women. Even if women are asked they never try to say the actual truth. If you try to study them they will come up with the line that women cannot be comprehended. But when you notice their behavior you will understand them. They communicate implicitly and not explicitly, they communicate covertly not overtly. A research was carried out by a man (Psychologist) who was asking women if they ever cheated on their Partner most of them deny. But when asked by a woman via a website (anonymously) the number skyrocketed. They mislead guys with advise on relationship, hence the reason the red pill don't take women relationship advice seriously. They don't say what they mean and don't mean what they say. Most advice a woman will give you will only be to the advantage of her gender. You ask them what kind of guy they like, they give you wrong advice sometimes unintentionally. |
Dpsychologist:To improve your LMS. Read this thread: https://www.nairaland.com/5806096/keys-seduction-self-improvement/1 |
Congrats |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 (of 112 pages)