Dpsychologist's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Dpsychologist's Profile › Dpsychologist's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 (of 112 pages)
frankman365:Word bro. Flesh and bone did not reveal this to you |
Updating9JA:We all know they married him for money. |
Baloranking:This is the new trend i have observed. Divorced Women are aggressively exploiting their estranged husbands. |
When a woman realises a man is mentally strong enough to shoulder her problems on top of his own, she will find this attractive. Women want men who can handle the problems that they can’t. This difference in emotional stability that is so intricately tied into the attraction mechanism explains why women are free to be emotionally indulgent to a point of selfishness, whilst men are comparatively restricted in the range of emotion they can express without weaving the thread of their own undoing. If both parties are to indulge their emotions, there is no stability and thus no sustainable relationship. As women find it far more difficult to be logical than men, the burden falls to men to suck it up and be the reasonable and strong ones. Even where men falter in this endeavour, they at least attempt it. It’s not fair, but it’s what works. |
10.) FRAME & EMOTIONAL INDULGENCE: Because women are prone to excessive emotion, they rely on men to be more emotionally resilient. This is the need for a man to be steadfast under pressure, sometimes we refer to this as “holding frame.” As women are typically more indulgent of their emotional whims than are men, they implicitly look toward men as a stabilising force. In this capacity a man often acts as a means for a woman to process her emotions, a “rock in the storm”; one who endures a woman’s Emotional turbulence while remaining unaffected himself. The reverse is not advisable, a man who confides his weaknesses in a woman all but signs his own death sentence. Women require either aggressive action to reassure them, or equanimity(calmness during turbulence) to calm them. If you lean on a woman then the relationship begin falling apart, a woman is poorly equipped to deal with her own problems, let alone a man’s – this is precisely the reason women crave for mental toughness in men. |
9.) LOVE HIERARCHY : “Women love children how men love women.” - IM If a woman thinks she is better than you, she can’t respect you. And if she can’t respect you, she can’t love you. Women love differently from men. Woman’s love is based on adoration, adoration is a combination of admiration and respect, respect is derived from power. Thus it follows that you must be powerful if you want to be loved, or you will never be loved. You will be held in contempt for being weak.(Hypergamy) Women love pragmatically, they lack a capacity to love unconditionally for romantic partners, this is reserved for their children. This behaviour is governed by an effect known as Briffault’s Law. However, men can love women unconditionally by merit of significant personal investment. There is a hierarchy of love: Men > Women > Children. An observation of the Hierarchy of Love shows that love flows downward. That is why a woman will be willing to die for her child than her husband. Ask a man to chose between his Wife or child and he will mostly choose his Wife when in a dilemma. This is vice versa for a woman. This is possibly because man is the disposable sex, men have been going to war for centuries leaving his wife and children. This is nature's way of making sure the man's offsprings live on. Women are more self-centred than men are in matters of money and love. Man’s love is expected to be sacrificial in nature, woman’s isn’t. Women love men opportunistically, men love women sacrificially. |
CAPSLOCKED:Wanted responding her but your respond made me satisfied. |
solite3:Bro you are welcome |
JasperVII:Yea bro. Thats the essence |
vest:yea thats the essence of the red link. It is an indication of the red pill |
8.) THE PARETO PRINCIPLE : The 80/20 rule recognises that in a society of rampant hypergamy roughly 20% of the men (1/5)are fucking 80% of the women. While the remaining (4/5) do not have sex. —Dpsychologist It is Only in conservative societies that each man guaranteed a wife within his relative social league established by the west. The 80/20 split indicates that 80% women are attracted to 20% of men but 20% men are attracted to 80% of women. |
I also have no idea o |
Men, on the other hand, can produce millions of sperm cells with little cost and can get away with reproducing with lots of females, not needing to care for the offspring as much. Men have not much to lose carelessly pumping and dumping many, potentially low-quality women, except for catching STDs. Men can even brag about many sex partners, even if of low quality, as men are chosen based on their status. Conversely, women cannot brag about this since women form pussy cartels and shame free sex to avoid losing control over men. Women are hence the limiting factor in reproduction rate, men need to compete for status in order to gain copulation opportunities. This, in turn, gives women more options to choose from, so they can also afford to be extra choosy, exploiting their privilege (see hypergamy). |
BATEMAN'S PRINCIPLE Bateman's principle states that women are choosier due to greater parental investment. Being more choosy , women are overall less interested in any sexual contact. This, in turn, means men have fewer dating opportunities on average, so men more likely make compromises out of sexual frustration (principle of least interest ). This allows women substantial decision power in sexual matters, which they can exploit by strategically withholding sex. Females have greater parental investment for a number of reasons. ¶ The production of eggs is more expensive than the production of sperm. ¶ By virtue of having a womb, reproducing is physically risky for women, especially due to the large human head. ¶ Sex is also riskier for women as the pocket shape of the vagina is more vulnerable to STDs . ¶ The offspring has higher dependence on the mother as the mother but not the father is guaranteed to be present at birth, and babies depend on women's breastmilk. ¶ Human offspring is also one of the most dependent offspring of all animals due to the complex socialization process and slow brain development that allows for higher intelligence. For these reasons, females have lower expected lifetime reproductive success , so each of the few offspring needs to be held to higher standards than men's. This makes women more choosy and coy . |
Dpsychologist: BRIFFAULT'S LAW The female, not the male, determines all the conditions of the animal family. Where the female can derive no benefit from association with the male, no such association takes place. — Briffault R, Buxton LHD. 1927. The Mothers: A Study of the Origins of Sentiments and Institutions . Vol. I, p. 191 Briffault's law holds that females only associate with men when they can personally benefit from doing so. Striking evidence of Briffault's law is summarized in Roy Baumeister's study on sexual economics: If sex is a female resource, then it will ultimately be up to the woman to decide when and whether sexual relations commence. This view of women as sexual gate-keepers was supported by Cohen and Shotland (1996), who computed correlations between when people thought sex should start in a given relationship and when they actually began having sex. For the hapless men, the correlation was not even significant (r = .19), indicating that their wishes and preferences were essentially irrelevant, whereas for women the correlation was very high (r = .88), indicating that sex occurred when they preferred. This study also found that men wanted sex to commence earlier than the women. Thus, women decide when sex commences, and the man’s role is to invest time, money, attention, commitment, and other resources until the woman is sufficiently satisfied. — Baumeister RF, Vohs KD. 2004. Sexual Economics: Sex as Female Resource for Social Exchange in Heterosexual Interactions. Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 8, No. 4, 339–363. |
UgojiC:Lol wetin we no see for this life |
SteelMcqueen:Thanks sir. I appreciate Feel free to contribute |
7.) WOMEN ARE THE CHOOSERS (Briffault's law and Bateman's principle) Stay tuned |
Some women are more hypergamous than others, but no woman is non-hypergamous. Think of it as a scale, some women are a little hypergamous, others extremely so. The more experienced a woman is, the more her hypergamy grows and the less her relational desirability. Women that make the best candidates for family and childrearing are those whose hypergamous instinct has been kept in check. Materialism and promiscuity are hypergamous behaviours, they’re indicative of a “constant need to upgrade,” which is hypergamy at its core. These kinds of women should be avoided for serious commitments. Frugal, humble women make for the best relationship prospects. |
Hypergamy not kept in check by a conservative upbringing and strong male family presence results in extremely opportunistic and disloyal women. In traditional societies, hypergamy is kept in check by the family, community and wider culture. Women are paired off with their male contemporaries rather than left to perpetually “wait for something better to come along.” During our grandparents and some of our parents days, hypergamy was in check. People do not belief in the soulmate myth of "the special person for you". Unfortunately in the time we live in where romance is glorified, hypergamy is gradually going unchecked. |
Hypergamy can manifest in many ways, the best known is gold digging, dating a man solely because of his greater wealth. In less exploitative relationships, a woman dates a man who is more confident than she is. Generally, women low in confidence are less hypergamous, whilst egotistical women are more so. The more beautiful she is the more hypergamous she is If a man with higher status is sexually available, a woman with unchecked hypergamy will cheat. If he’s available for commitment, there’s a strong possibility she will abandon her man to pair off with the better option. This phenomenon is referred to as “branch swinging.” |
6.) HYPERGAMY & BRANCH SWINGING: Female hypergamy is dual in its approach to men, a man is either deemed superior, or inferior. If a woman believes a man is inferior to her, he’s sexually invisible, only when a woman deems a man superior does he become visible. Women want men who demonstrably exude power in a way that makes them feel inferior. When a woman feels inferior to a man, she is attracted to him. We call this hypergamy( to date up and/or social climb) that is why women are highly sensitive to signifiers of high status (good genes, wealth, confidence, popularity etc.). In constrast to this, men practice hypogamy(dating down) or horizontal dating (someone within their status that is why guys are afraid of a lady with high status ladies, they can't cope with them, that is Probably the reason why Genevive and linda ikeji are not married. However these same ladies are crushing on men with higher status than them such as Dwayne Johnson and Tyler Perry respectively. |
Women in and of themselves rarely stand for something because they have deduced it to be true and correct, but rather they believe what they do due to prolonged proximity. So they believe what their teacher believes, or what their mother believes, or what their friends believe, rather than really analyse something and see if it is true with their own minds. That is why beyoncé is referred to as queenBee. She is what ladies look up to. A woman’s instinctual need to be accepted is so strong that she conforms, and contented enough to submit to authority and not ask questions. It is no surprise to see Women get married to a different Religion or church denominations and still confirms to its tenets . |
Fickleness is a strong trait of the feminine( Section 1), and it manifests in all matters of importance from apostasy to divorce. The most common reason for religious conversion is to marry a man of another religion (and thus be accepted and enjoy his economic resources) whilst the most common reason for quitting religion is to find a socially acceptable way to be promiscuous (basically denounce one’s faith and become an atheist.) In the UK, British women convert to Islam so they can have more victim credibility, as well as a politically correct reason to be feminine rather than feminist. It also serves as a way to increase the perception of their purity and respectability, as Muslim women are not reputed for promiscuity in the way that atheist women are. In the US, Mormon and Christian girls are becoming atheist via feminist support groups so they can wh0re it up in their prime without feeling impure. Nevertheless, they appear to be able to defy the religion they were raised with so long as they have feminist support to cheer them on and validate their poor life decisions. |
5.) FEMALE HERD MENTALITY : A woman’s most pressing concern in spite of what she says to the contrary, is how she is perceived and how this translates into whether she holds favour or not. Being liked and desired is far more important to women than it is to men, men requiring respect rather than intimate emotion validation to function. In fact, acceptance from others is so vitally important to women that they will change an entire wardrobe, religion, sexual or political orientation in order to be and feel accepted. If you observe rates of religious conversion (from one religion to another) you will find women will convert from one religion to another more often than men. Women are innately superficially concerned with “fitting in” and appearing agreeable in order to be liked enough to enjoy the fruits of the groups they occupy . |
Goodnight. See you tomorrow |
The intolerance for physical violence coupled with the tolerance for mental violence is what allows women to bully and socially dominate without being held accountable by a system of law. Men are as such forced to learn to become as apt in mental violence as women, or face social disadvantage. The law does not criminalise emotional violence against men. Where physical violence is illegal (but typically more so if it is male on female rather than female on male), emotional violence is a question of personal morality and therefore not legislated against. Where a man’s instinct is to hit, a woman’s is to make you miserable. Arguably, mental wounds can be just as crippling if not more so than physical. In summation, women tend to be more emotionally aggressive than men. For further reading : https://www.nairaland.com/5832576/masters-manipulation-dating-clinic |
4.) WOMAN’S MANIPULATIVE NATURE : Women are Machiavellian by nature. In comparison to the average man, they are far more proficient in matters of persuasion and general social manipulation. The theoretical evolutionary basis for this sex difference is that due to smaller body mass and inferior musculature, women evolved to attract and use men as tools rather than directly compete with them. This makes the pronunciation of female strength a propensity to be mentally rather than physically violent. Physical violence is outlawed, whereas mental abuse is not, with a suppression of physical violence without an equal suppression of mental, women are at a social advantage. See A woman’s confession of how they control men: https://www.nairaland.com/6020288/how-women-control-men-woman#92199887 And their manipulative tactics here: https://www.nairaland.com/6042546/women-emotionally-strong-creature |
Ayomide119:The Redpill is a rejection and opposition to the bluepill . It is a negative stance on a popular, pleasant falsehood. With regards to mainstream norms, it represents the philosophies opposed to the prevailing social norm. The origin of the phrase “redpill”, “bluepill” and it’s variants is from the “Red Pill Or Blue Pill” scene from The Matrix, where the protagonist, Neo, is forced to decide whether to take the red pill or the blue pill. The red pill would let him discover the truth about the world, and the blue pill would send him back to the Matrix not knowing anything. Neo takes the red pill and he is unplugged to reality The Redpill even though Bitter to Taste and difficult to swallow emancipates. It is far more difficult to believe a known lie than an unknown truth — Dpsychologist |
3.) WOMEN , LOGIC & EMOTIVE REASONING: Women are irrational and inconsistent, they have a capacity for logic but they are not typically inclined to utilise it. Women must exert concentrated effort to be logical for it is not their factory setting, men on the other hand although imperfect have a far more pronounced affinity for logic. As such by matter of preference if not biology, men are near universally superior logicians and decision makers.- IM A logical woman is easily baited into becoming emotional. Regardless of intellect, women are far more likely to lose lucidity due to a stronger preference for emotive reasoning. It is by extension of this that we observe women to be more easily compromised in a line of reasoning than men. A woman’s decisions are based on her current emotional state, not logic. Once overwhelmed by the feeling of the moment and riding on a tidal wave of emotion, even if an awareness of what is fair and rational remains intact in a woman, she shall opt to ignore it in favour of indulging “what feels right.” |
They ignore their influence of feminine soft power in society (influence and charm), and comparing men and women solely in hard power (economic and political). In taking this highly one-sided approach to power, feminists play upon humanity’s propensity to take pity on women, and where the myth of female powerlessness is bought into, more power is redistributed to them. Now that the pendulum has swung much too far in favour of women, a successful male counter movement has failed to materialise. Not solely because, but chiefly because pity is in short supply for men. A man seeking pity is despised for his weakness rather than helped because of it, and so the very psychological mechanism which gave birth to female economic and political power is nought but a dead end for men. |
2.) FEMINISM , PITY , POWER & PRIVILEGE : “All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.” – George Orwell Feminism is nothing more than a female supremacy movement posing as one of humanist egalitarianism. Feminism highlights female incompetence in areas where men excel, redefines them as injustices by blaming men for female ineptitude, and then legally mandates the promotion of women within said areas. As such, women consistently make social gains in areas where men have traditionally dominated. Feminists crave privileges which consolidate the realm of male power with that of the female. Typically they are cooperative in ways which benefit them(men pay for dates) but aggressive where it limit their power (intolerance for female promiscuity, a reluctance to trust women with leadership.) |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 (of 112 pages)
