DrLiveLogic's Posts
Nairaland Forum › DrLiveLogic's Profile › DrLiveLogic's Posts
AmazonTopaz:I'm just here hoping you're truly an Amazon because no ordinary woman will be able to endure the emotional trauma you're about to be put through, especially after the media created all these false hopes. Al Gore comes to mind. Wait patiently till January, okay. Sit back and enjoy the ride. The whole world is about to watch a most epic display and an exposure of the swamp on unreal levels. LMAO! Remember this word-#RETRUMPENCE#. The greatest recompense to the swamp and the president ever seen on global stage. |
Tamaratonye5:Thank you, Tantrum and you too. [1] Is ordered a binary variable? Like True/False? If so can you give an example of something that is not ordered?No weasel word here. Ordered as per marked by order and rule as evidenced in the laws of the universe/physics However, lest we dive into another unending loop, my question actually is do you think there is anything you could learn from Mr. Flew? He's a smart guy you know, justifying the brain he was given, what do you think? |
GreyLaw:I'm 1000% with you bro. Funny how only few people know what's up. It's AmazoTopaz I think you mean. I feel for her and other libs cos it hurts more when you were made to rejoice first only to end up in tears. LMAO! One thing I know, based on some other stuff is all that's going on on the surface is pure hogwash, come 2021, Trump will remain in the WH and Biden will go to jail. Bookmark this comment, lots of kids here will call me a fool and sympathiser, LMAO, but I'll prolly not respond to any quotes on this until it's all over. |
GamalNasser:The states print their ballot but the paper would be watermarked before the printing. I think DHS had the printing contract. There's yet to be official statement from Trump camp though but one thing I know, based on some other stuff is all that's going on on the surface is pure hogwash, come 2021, Trump will remain in the WH and Biden will go to jail. Bookmark this comment, lots of kids here will call me a fool and sympathiser, LMAO, but ill prolly not respond to any quotes on this until it's all over. |
sonmvayina:Check out my GOAT movie thread, it'll enlighten you some. And understand one thing, There is only one God, YHWH but He has three aspects and the three are equal and one. In your human reasoning, you still fail to see that for something to exist even as one thing , it must have at least three aspects though god has made this easily seen in all creation. There isn't a single 1-D or 2-D object in the universe nor can there be. For any object to be real, it must be 3-D. Even yourself, for you to be real, you must have a mind to imagine, a heart to feel and a soul to desire. Consider again that a single atom is made up of 3 basic particles and consider too, that matter exists in 3 states, one object but 3 different states of the same substance. Is it not all too obvious that the creator exists in the template of 3 in every 1. This is how Father, Word and Spirit are 3-D, one Being revealing the fullness of God one aspect per time to man and in man. Surely the triune god that the bible patriarchs met has one more reason to be the true creator of this universe. Cc: Budaatum, Martian, HeartlessBanker 1Sharon really must have had a good laugh with her meme but what I always find is people can never make fun of realities. If you find something queer about what you heard about God, it's only a lie you heard and puts responsibility on you to search for truth, it's no one's job to do that for you, too. Her meme is mocking a straw man narrative and is at best ignorance on display, but well, for the laughs I guess. Investigate god, he's all over creation. Everything you need to know about the creator is imprinted like a seal on creation hence men have no excuse for their ignorance. Rip Maximus69 aka MaxInDHouse, can I ask why you are using both your current moniker and AkinwaleJJ moniker at the same time. Is this another one of your JW recruitment tactics? |
kingxsamz:It matters not what labels men give to him, does it? The authentic creator is the one who's got his signature on all creation. When you meet him, then you will know his name. So I believe we should all just follow the trail left in all of creation, especially and beginning from those things that cannot be tampered with by creation viz. laws of nature and then our very own selves as well, and we would realise the true creator. If he didn't leave a trail of himself in creation, only then we'd all be justified in not acknowledging him. Like the laws of the universe for instance, teach us that action and reaction are equal and opposite, can never be changed by creation. It means the intelligence behind the universe definitely believes you must eventually get a retribution for all your actions, good and evil. So then do what you know is right and keep on until you find the true creator. If you will want guidance on this path. I have a set of questions that might interest you and that you'll need to answer to set you up for the quest. Holla if interested. Dantedasz:That's what your lips say. But there's still hope if that's not what the bottom of your heart says when you're all by yourself. Good luck. |
rottennaija:Lol. I know you're an MSM drone never-Trumper. Seen some of your previous posts. And of course, Pence was always gonna school Harris. But @ the bolded, don't worry, Pence will take over from Trump in '24(Don't worry about MSM, there's always the growing silent majority especially as it gets clearer that the Dems never had the nation in mind). Trump is the rugged bulldozing, foundation layer. Then when he's taken all the heat and cleared the deep state swamp, calm Pence will implement the other conservative reforms. But I'm scared for AmazonTopaz, what she gonna do when Trump wins again on Nov 3. Ma'am, again, I think you're taking this dangerously too personal, chill out! |
Been a long while here. Anyway, I've always said I have more respect for agnostics than anyone who says there's no creator cause I haven't seen one. The more you think and get logical, the closer you are to admitting that this ordered universe could NEVER have been without a superior intelligence. The universe screams ID. Atheism is either as a result of inability to venture into deep critical reasoning because one has other preferences or if the atheist has ventured thus, then they are just staunch, bull-headed denialists. Tamaratonye5, Dantedasz, kingxsamz and co is there anything to learn from Dr. Flew? LordReed:The difference is the apostates leave because they find that the religious practices are either not working or just difficult to keep. Doesn't mean belief in creator is irrational. It's different when a man on the track of critical reasoning, which atheism makes claim to, advances in reasoning to a point of concession. It shows you that if you really are on the path of reasoning, you should be expecting to arrive at this same point. |
brb |
planetx:Honestly bro. You revived my hope. Going through this thread, I couldn't help but smh at the foolishness and the lack of reasoning of people. Like in what way could Trump ever pull this stunt in his favour? This is everything but in his favour. I'm yet to even see what would have been a more reasonable allegation, which is that he could have contracted it at the debate and could have actually been a democrat plot or something, not that I'm alleging so. Well, could only be sheer ignorance or just animosity blinding people who think like this. I can never underestimate the power of the media. It showed with @45, arguably the best POTUS in history of fighting for the citizens and yet the most hated. |
@ RandomGuy48, Oh really. Okay, never knew rainbows over WH are not so rare since they don't get reported in the news. So maybe we can take that out of the list then. But I still think you're trying too hard to take away credit where it's due. 5 high chance picks in your list, but this guy ever before that, no guessing/probability, picked just the right one. Greater still was Harris. I don't see how that could ever just pass as chance. That she would be the pick to challenge Trump in 2020, knowing this way back in 2017, no chance here. Add to that was what he got as 'queen'. Makes it spicier now we see she's VP. That fits into the 'just once is enough' disappearing act class cause it can't be chance to have called her name way back then. It's okay if you're still not convinced though, what have we got but to watch things play out? Nov 3 it is then. And for parting, factor in that neither Charlie nor creator actually put this out to prove a point. maybe if that was the case, creator would be careful to reveal things in such a way as is impossible to be poked under scrutiny. it's usually just to get the vessel (who already is convinced and familiar with his creator's voice) and those who would already believe to pray it into happening. But oh well... Safe! @ForeverSaved. Thanks and yep, everyone to their beliefs is a right indeed. |
RandomGuy48:C'mon man, really? Your view is laden with bias. Fairly obvious? Not even close. Trump happened to release a list of 20 possible picks that all had a high chance. So why didn't he just call any of the 19 other Justices in Trump's list and even the others that didn't make the list? No, with all the precision you get, just Amy he mentioned, 2 years ago, too. Kamala Harris was less obvious but his prophecy about her is more vague... note he doesn't say she would become vice president or anything specific, just the vague that she would somehow be important. It should also be noted that other portions of that prophecy have yet to pass.Again, man, play fair. Seriously, this is just trying too hard to not give credit. Kamala is one woman out of thousands in her rank. How could anyone have possibly thought she would be THE queen picked to trump Trump in 2017, Trump's first year. How would anyone have even guessed there would be a "queen" i.e. female vice. Don't you see there's too much in it. Again as you said, the rest is still underway. So let's wait and see. And the rainbow one doesn't mean anything... rainbows can happen after rain and rain occurs at the White House. A rainbow was eventually going to show up.Not again. You realise how rainbows are cast, don't you? And that should give an idea of on just how much probability you'd be staking to predict a rainbow over your house rather than all the many others or the WH, for that matter and PUBLICLY too. Ok, so how many times in history has that been observed over WH? My search says just once on record. So make this just a second and only months after he prophesied. Cut the guy some slack man. But the mark of a true prophet isn't that they manage to get prophecies right. It's that they don't get prophecies wrong. If you make a lot of prophecies, some are, by simple statistics, going to come true.Nah. This doesn't work like with scientific laws, always 100%. No! Some prophecies are set in stone, some are dependent on people's actions. This is the case even in the bible. Now here's how to look at it. If I'm right in front of you and told you I've got magical disappearing powers, and I did an incantation ten times but I only disappeared 5 times from your sight. You wouldn't say the 5 fails invalidate the 5 successes, right? Maybe I've just not perfected the art. That's how it is- a perfect creator moving through IMPERFECT, getting-better-at-it vessels. Prolly only Jesus would have had such a perfect prophecy record. So the true mark of a prophet is actually his ability to get info with enough clear-cut details that are not directly logically deducible, and often too. Btw, this "fail" could turn out different. "9 will be a sign that righteousness has come to the nation" would not be wrong for now cause we all know righteousness isn't born in the nation yet, still a lot of swamp draining and corruption. So maybe when that's the case, the 9 seats and the others will happen? Gotta wait and see. Someone prophesied about Trump 8 years before he became POTUS. Would have looked wrong in Obama's two terms, wouldn't it? But today, he's vindicated. @AmazonTopaz, take a chill pill ma'am, it's not personal. I doubt you stand to gain anything in Biden winning. Are you a liberal? And who gave you the idea creator uses only perfect men? Nebuchadnezzar and Cyrus were not perfect and he called them his "anointed" for their specific purpose. And you said I should use my sense, but didn't give me any thing to use it on. Like why shouldn't I vote for Trump? Not that I even intend to vote or anything. And Trump ain't racist except on MSM. But you don't need anyone to tell you Biden will give China all they could ask, discard the #2A, take away guns and has no economic policy. Let's keep watching, too. If Charlie's prophecies come true, I think a lot of dirt on the Dems will be revealed. |
jmoore:Yeah. I get your point, though this is supposed to only affect the first generation of species, so the error should lie in the age range of the first generation. However, expanding your point, the truth is there are still many unknowns and blindsides, Our model assumes everything has been running on a fixed template without transitions and stuff like that. |
While many think creator no longer speaks and is prolly not real until tested in a scientific lab (LMAO!), here are fulfilled prophecies by those who actually relate personally with him daily. Take note of the track record of this prophet, Charlie Shamp. There's no coincidence here. He's obviously relating with something real outside of space-time domain. So here we go: 1./ He prophesied Amy Barrett as SCOTUS, 2 years ago [url=https://mobile.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10213733928701449&id=1802676077&refid=18&_ft_=qid.6877065841827918591%3Amf_story_key.3394102130659148%3Agroup_id.113487655387295%3Atop_level_post_id.3394102130659148%3Atl_objid.3394102130659148%3Acontent_owner_id_new.799340330%3Aoriginal_content_id.10213733928701449%3Aoriginal_content_owner_id.1802676077%3Apage_id.113487655387295%3Asrc.22%3Aphoto_id.10213733928461443%3Astory_location.6%3Aattached_story_attachment_style.photo%3Afilter.GroupStoriesByActivityEntQuery%3Atds_flgs.3%3Aott.AX-JYJcA6KvFY3vu%3Apage_insights.%7B%22113487655387295%22%3A%7B%22page_id%22%3A113487655387295%2C%22page_id_type%22%3A%22group%22%2C%22actor_id%22%3A799340330%2C%22dm%22%3A%7B%22isShare%22%3A1%2C%22originalPostOwnerID%22%3A10213733928701449%7D%2C%22psn%22%3A%22EntGroupMallPostCreationStory%22%2C%22post_context%22%3A%7B%22object_fbtype%22%3A657%2C%22publish_time%22%3A1601149266%2C%22story_name%22%3A%22EntGroupMallPostCreationStory%22%2C%22story_fbid%22%3A%5B3394102130659148%5D%7D%2C%22role%22%3A1%2C%22sl%22%3A6%7D%7D&__tn__=C-R] Prophecy of SCOTUS Amy Coney[/url] This is already underway now. Fulfillment of SCOTUS underway 2/ He also prophesied Kamala Harris' role in this election with quite some interesting plot the democrats have got and some other info about the election 3 years ago. As we know, Kamala Harris is already featuring. Game on so far. From his site: Prophecy of Kamala Harris' Political Role OR [url=https://mobile.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10213468749672139&id=1802676077&set=a.2693672320012&refid=52&_ft_=mf_story_key.10213468775832793%3Atop_level_post_id.10213468775832793%3Atl_objid.10213468775832793%3Acontent_owner_id_new.1802676077%3Athrowback_story_fbid.10213468775832793%3Aphoto_id.10213468749672139%3Astory_location.4%3Astory_attachment_style.photo%3Athid.1802676077&__tn__=EH-R]Prophecy of Kamala Harris Political Role[/url] 3/ Yep. This same prophet prophesied a shift taking place in Washington of God coming in to take control with a physical marker, a "sign" of a rainbow over the White House months before it happened this year. Prophecy of Sign of Rainbow over WH and The video Ya with me? It's getting hot in here now. Fulfilled Prophecy of Rainbow over WH 4/ And now, here's some spice. He's got another prophecy of an assassination attempt that brings a twist in this year's election campaign. I will bring this up when it's fulfilled shortly, i.e. before November 3, and it's already easy to deduce all actors in the prophecy but just in case you're wondering, he already made clear that Donald Trump's coming back after all said and done and that Trump's handpicked by God. Ya hear that? Too, he also claims to walk in authentic miracles with testimonies from recepients. You can find out more about him on his Facebook page. [url=https://mobile.facebook.com/charlie.shamp?refid=18&_ft_=qid.6877238383992262690%3Amf_story_key.3394102130659148%3Agroup_id.113487655387295%3Atop_level_post_id.3394102130659148%3Atl_objid.3394102130659148%3Acontent_owner_id_new.799340330%3Aoriginal_content_id.10213733928701449%3Aoriginal_content_owner_id.1802676077%3Apage_id.113487655387295%3Asrc.22%3Aphoto_id.10213733928461443%3Astory_location.6%3Aattached_story_attachment_style.photo%3Afilter.GroupStoriesByActivityEntQuery%3Atds_flgs.3%3Aott.AX-JYJcA6KvFY3vu%3Apage_insights.%7B%22113487655387295%22%3A%7B%22page_id%22%3A113487655387295%2C%22page_id_type%22%3A%22group%22%2C%22actor_id%22%3A799340330%2C%22dm%22%3A%7B%22isShare%22%3A1%2C%22originalPostOwnerID%22%3A10213733928701449%7D%2C%22psn%22%3A%22EntGroupMallPostCreationStory%22%2C%22post_context%22%3A%7B%22object_fbtype%22%3A657%2C%22publish_time%22%3A1601149266%2C%22story_name%22%3A%22EntGroupMallPostCreationStory%22%2C%22story_fbid%22%3A%5B3394102130659148%5D%7D%2C%22role%22%3A1%2C%22sl%22%3A6%7D%7D&__tn__=CH-R]Charlie Shamp Facebook[/url] And yeah, I don't know that he prophesied about the Corona Virus in direct and clear terms. So if you got any issues with that or think that should discredit anyone's prophetic portfolio at all, go argue with creator. And just for the record, he's not the only prophet with such track record, there's just so many of them in the U.S., that I know of but they're just somehow not that popular. |
While many think creator no longer speaks and is prolly not real until tested in a scientific lab (LMAO!), here are fulfilled prophecies by those who actually relate personally with him daily. Take note of the track record of this prophet, Charlie Shamp. There's no coincidence here. He's obviously relating with something real outside of space-time domain. So here we go: 1./ He prophesied Amy Barrett as SCOTUS, 2 years ago [url=https://mobile.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10213733928701449&id=1802676077&refid=18&_ft_=qid.6877065841827918591%3Amf_story_key.3394102130659148%3Agroup_id.113487655387295%3Atop_level_post_id.3394102130659148%3Atl_objid.3394102130659148%3Acontent_owner_id_new.799340330%3Aoriginal_content_id.10213733928701449%3Aoriginal_content_owner_id.1802676077%3Apage_id.113487655387295%3Asrc.22%3Aphoto_id.10213733928461443%3Astory_location.6%3Aattached_story_attachment_style.photo%3Afilter.GroupStoriesByActivityEntQuery%3Atds_flgs.3%3Aott.AX-JYJcA6KvFY3vu%3Apage_insights.%7B%22113487655387295%22%3A%7B%22page_id%22%3A113487655387295%2C%22page_id_type%22%3A%22group%22%2C%22actor_id%22%3A799340330%2C%22dm%22%3A%7B%22isShare%22%3A1%2C%22originalPostOwnerID%22%3A10213733928701449%7D%2C%22psn%22%3A%22EntGroupMallPostCreationStory%22%2C%22post_context%22%3A%7B%22object_fbtype%22%3A657%2C%22publish_time%22%3A1601149266%2C%22story_name%22%3A%22EntGroupMallPostCreationStory%22%2C%22story_fbid%22%3A%5B3394102130659148%5D%7D%2C%22role%22%3A1%2C%22sl%22%3A6%7D%7D&__tn__=C-R] Prophecy of SCOTUS Amy Coney[/url] This is already underway now. Fulfillment of SCOTUS underway 2/ He also prophesied Kamala Harris' role in this election with quite some interesting plot the democrats have got and some other info about the election 3 years ago. As we know, Kamala Harris is already featuring. Game on so far. From his site: Prophecy of Kamala Harris' Political Role OR [url=https://mobile.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10213468749672139&id=1802676077&set=a.2693672320012&refid=52&_ft_=mf_story_key.10213468775832793%3Atop_level_post_id.10213468775832793%3Atl_objid.10213468775832793%3Acontent_owner_id_new.1802676077%3Athrowback_story_fbid.10213468775832793%3Aphoto_id.10213468749672139%3Astory_location.4%3Astory_attachment_style.photo%3Athid.1802676077&__tn__=EH-R]Prophecy of Kamala Harris Political Role[/url] 3/ Yep. This same prophet prophesied a shift taking place in Washington of God coming in to take control with a physical marker, a "sign" of a rainbow over the White House months before it happened this year. Prophecy of Sign of Rainbow over WH and The video Ya with me? It's getting hot in here now. Fulfilled Prophecy of Rainbow over WH 4/ And now, here's some spice. He's got another prophecy of an assassination attempt that brings a twist in this year's election campaign. I will bring this up when it's fulfilled shortly, i.e. before November 3, and it's already easy to deduce all actors in the prophecy but just in case you're wondering, he already made clear that Donald Trump's coming back after all said and done and that Trump's handpicked by God. Ya hear that? Too, he also claims to walk in authentic miracles with testimonies from recepients. You can find out more about him on his Facebook page. [url=https://mobile.facebook.com/charlie.shamp?refid=18&_ft_=qid.6877238383992262690%3Amf_story_key.3394102130659148%3Agroup_id.113487655387295%3Atop_level_post_id.3394102130659148%3Atl_objid.3394102130659148%3Acontent_owner_id_new.799340330%3Aoriginal_content_id.10213733928701449%3Aoriginal_content_owner_id.1802676077%3Apage_id.113487655387295%3Asrc.22%3Aphoto_id.10213733928461443%3Astory_location.6%3Aattached_story_attachment_style.photo%3Afilter.GroupStoriesByActivityEntQuery%3Atds_flgs.3%3Aott.AX-JYJcA6KvFY3vu%3Apage_insights.%7B%22113487655387295%22%3A%7B%22page_id%22%3A113487655387295%2C%22page_id_type%22%3A%22group%22%2C%22actor_id%22%3A799340330%2C%22dm%22%3A%7B%22isShare%22%3A1%2C%22originalPostOwnerID%22%3A10213733928701449%7D%2C%22psn%22%3A%22EntGroupMallPostCreationStory%22%2C%22post_context%22%3A%7B%22object_fbtype%22%3A657%2C%22publish_time%22%3A1601149266%2C%22story_name%22%3A%22EntGroupMallPostCreationStory%22%2C%22story_fbid%22%3A%5B3394102130659148%5D%7D%2C%22role%22%3A1%2C%22sl%22%3A6%7D%7D&__tn__=CH-R]Charlie Shamp Facebook[/url] And yeah, I don't know that he prophesied about the Corona Virus in direct and clear terms. So if you got any issues with that or think that should discredit anyone's prophetic portfolio at all, go argue with creator. And just for the record, he's not the only prophet with such track record, there's just so many of them in the U.S., that I know of but they're just somehow not that popular. |
angelfallz:Ok, pal. Maybe one day. Thanks. LMAO @bukatyne preferred to evade. I guess that proves the suggestions here are untested and unreliable just like I thought. Biglittlelois: ![]() mariahAngel:.... ![]() |
@bukatyne, I'm sure you must have enjoyed reading the OP but the point is to get you to see that what this will achieve is mostly just a back and forth of opinions, battle of the sexes, with everyone getting their hands in the cake but no one changing for real afterall. You can't make a man to be a man in life and around women with a to-do-list of whatever one conceives men should do. It's superficial change that will be misappropriated and even compromised under pressure. Being a man is his nature which comes out once he faces and conquers his own flaws rather than make excuses for them. So rather than avoid the straightforward question, which doesn't depend on how well I read the OP, do tell, have you tried bringing out the man in your own husband by introducing him to these in your OP? Do tell how it's worked so far, if so. If you wish not to answer, it's fine because that's an answer in itself we can all deduce. @angelfallz, not quite sure what you mean or how you read my post but you are right to deduce I'm no redpiller, never even read any books cause there's a long catalogue on subjects of interest, I'd have to read off before such though I've come across some of the ideologies on this forum. I'm in total support of anything that can help men be who they really are because societal structures today subtly program men to lose their masculinity especially in the West. This is why I never look down on a fellow man, even those your men mock as simps, but see all as having equal potential but only tapped by the knowledgeable. If the redpill can help men towards discovering their masculinity, great with me. But what I don't believe is trying to teach men how to treat women and I mean from either side of the spectrum. That already robs him of his masculinity. I don't even believe there should be such a cause. A woman, as well as most other things, is a small project when you've handled the big project of your own self and the goal should be to help her maximize her potentials. Plus, EVERY sane woman, including the strongest of them, that meets a man who has discovered himself, treats him like a rare treasure and submits naturally. Hence, I maintain, genuine authority is voluntary submission without psychological manipulation and true authority, in many cases, doesn't need to be forced. And that's just on the side of focusing on developing yourself towards perfection. Asides all other privileges, even fellow men would submit your to your leadership when you can solve life's problems because you've learnt from developing yourself. This is my own redpill - the bitter truth of facing my weaknesses everyday, never excusing any, and by perseverance, conquering them, hence developing in everyway, everyday until death. Peace bro. |
All these write-ups on how to handle a woman are just DoAs. Couldn't read through it cause most of these just tickle the fancy of the readers, they don't really solve the underlying problem and although they may be making some good points, they're more or less really are just tryna build an exotic house without a foundation. The foundation to true success, the unleashing of one's potentials and hence masculinity is in the conquest of oneself rather than conquering another or how you relate with another. This is the whole syllabus of masculinity. Once you overcome yourself, you've already placed yourself above all others. That's expensive truth. The secret to letting loose your masculinity is conquering your own self, your weaknesses, your urges, emotions, rather than how to manage some woman. A woman in the picture merely compromises the authenticity of the conquest and she can never qualify as a conquest but is ultimately just one who needs your guidance and discipline, like a child (with many excesses), to maximize her own potential. Plus, try as she may, even in her most genuine attempts, a woman's natural tendencies incapacitate her in helping any man arrive at his own masculinity. She does not know the way into it and cannot conceive the rigours behind it though she definitely craves it. So even OP cannot help her husband. The conquest of self is a costly, deliberate, persevering lifestyle of discipline with a clear aim of increasing capacity until death. Forget about everyone else, even wife and focus on yourself as the task and the project. Learn your weaknesses and slave for knowledge to conquer each and you'll learn how to manage every other human gaining the psychologically edge over all. This is the key to true masculinity. As a matter of fact, EVERY sane woman will automatically submit to you, if you let this man in you out. A struggle with a woman for authority undermines it, even if you win. True authority is voluntary submission to the one who is proven worthy. The potential to succeed is equal in all men but circumstances and choices lend to remould men into disappointments.... ....gotta go for now. Wait a minute....OP bukatyne, over to you, have you given your husband these and what has been the result? |
Like, wait a minute. About 20 odd people here believe this story. Did you guys miss the elevator part or something? ![]() VictoriaGrace, don't conclude that you're smart yet. It's just there's an unbelievable lot of gullible people in the world right now. Look how some are pouring out some really good advice heartily and emotionally on this script. Smh. ![]() |
MuttleyLaff:Bravo!! @ the bolded, MuttleyLaff. That's top notch, top-secret, classified info you got there. Blabbermouth I wish you'd take a cue from the bolded. It'll save you a lot of mess in this subject you're handling. I'll go deeper into this in the purpose of creation and the origin of good and evil. I know you're scared to believe God could've known evil could happen and yet created the possibility but you need to know that if anything is POSSIBLE (emphasis on possible, meaning permitted by the laws of existence), good or evil, it must happen eventually in the span of existence. What matters though is that by divine power, good will ultimately overcome evil. So God will be justified in those that choose His ways. And I'm yet to understand the rationale behind you asking me to show from OT that Jesus is one with YHWH. I already did that with the Psalms 102 and there's some more but why the emphasis on OT, anyway. What you getting at? |
Maximus69:We are all used to you JWs, Janosky, DappaD, and co. When you cannot override the truth of the bible, you start looking for how to psychologically manipulate those that do and start trying to create division. FYI, Csonice1, solite3, bloodofthelamb, Emusan and the rest of us all agree that the bible makes the Father, Word and Spirit, One and coequals. Our english may communicate it differently because it's an imperfect language. None of us can even boast of understanding it perfectly until we reach perfection hence like Paul says, we all see in part, but our case is better than y'all because we believe God and his words while y'all hate truth but love your leaders who control your sheeple minds. And I'm still coming with more truths y'all can't stand on my Triuneness thread. Janosky is still not tired of quoting verses about the son of Man, and the son of God. Janosky go and read my GOAT movie thread and save yourself from your delusion. All these scriptures you're quoting cannot save your life, learner. As for your Proverbs 8:22 dilemma. You learners should look up the word qanah. It was used 84 times and 99% of the time was translated "owned, possessed, procured". Stop deceiving yourselves the word for create, "bara" is completely different. God possessed wisdom from the start as a divine property and attribute, that is what is being said. He didn't create wisdom. Wisdom is also given a female personality throughout Proverbs not a male personality hence it does not refer to Michael or Jesus Christ but rather speaks of a divine property. |
Blabbermouth:Pointless back and forth. Already figured out what you're about since plus your ego. Your so called doctrine is half-truth, very porous and easy for any random analyst to spot the weaknesses. Somehow you seem to be the only one seeing me jumping ships. Again sir, you are twisting words to satisfy your self.Expected you would tell yourself so but both Muttley/laff telling you how "twisted you are without needing any help" and shade, in almost all his posts, have pointed it out. Heck, everyone sees it except you. LMAO. I never said God Forthtold Lucifer to fall. Once again, you couldn't comprehend my simple sentences.Why are you avoiding the point which is how you mix up things and later change? plus you've even said: "...anything God didn't forthtell is nonexistent..." and Lucifer and his fall are existing, so....Apart from even telling shade that foreknowledge and predestination were at the same point. It's why you were told you're twisted. Hahahahahahaha hahahahahahaha hahahahahahaha.... As if I've never seen these bible verses:**Facepalm**,smh. Wonder why it took you so long to bring out these verses. I had been anticipating them the moment you tried smuggling your "darkness is light" fraud LMAO! You just can't get any more twisted. So you believe God's light is darkness because he wrapped himself in a cloud. Smh. You're not a very thorough bible student. Learn to go beyond KJV and study original languages. FYI, "Clouds and darkness" in Psalm 97:2 are two Hebrew words that always go as a pair in OT. Simply means "regular clouds(as in the day sky) and thick clouds(as in for rain)". FYI, these clouds are lit up with his glory light like the sun lighting up a cloud. Remember, the pillar of light-giving fire covered up in a cloud in daytime in the wilderness, right? You can never generate the fraud "God's "darkness" is still light" from the bible. Give it up. As for Psalm 18:11, LMAO. You should learn to read the context of a verse before quoting it henceforth. Psa 18:9-12... He spread out the heavens and descended with a thick cloud under his feet, riding on a cherub, he flew down, darting on the wings of the wind. He made the darkness his covering and his pavilion surrounding him were dark waters and the thick clouds of vapour. And with the brightness before him he passed the heavy clouds, with hail stones and coals of fire.... FYI, this describes a descent into the realms of darkness and waters and what God did with the dreaded darkness in all its power showing he knew every trick in their book and used darkness to as a play thing. It is not describing God's state in heaven which is 1Ti 6:16 who alone has immortality, dwelling in light which none can approach. 1 John 1:5" God is light, and in him is no darkness at all Jas 1:17 ... the Father of lights, with whom is no alteration, neither shade of turning. Not today bro, no place for you to hide, Light is everywhere here (pun intended) and clearly established that there is no special kind of darkness/evil with God. The darkness in this context is not the same meaning as the one in...Smh. Fraud! I speak not as a Man.Only as a conceited man. Dude, you are so lost in your bubble. When you ever get true light, you'll be set on a mountain for men to see, not self-claiming on nairaland. Go get true light. If I come over to your house and beat you almost to death with a club, and I said it is Good or Ra'ah. Will you organize a party for me? Every Ra'ah done outside the will of God is the one God judges you for.If I come to your house and beat you to death with a club (following God's order), as a man, that is "Ra'ah" to you but God will tell me kudos for it. So you see now, When God said "know Good and evil" , He still was not exceeding his nature.Give up man. Ra'ah is ra'ah. It's used with only one meaning - evil, bad, wicked, opposite of good, always and this was it's meaning in Isaiah 45:6 Smiles.... That was God's confidence in Abraham and there was nothing like foreknowledge there. The same confidence I have in my wife that she will not cheat and I wrote her name boldly in my will.Smh. God knew what Abraham was gonna do before he did it. Now you change your stance again. Before you said God does not know what we will do before we do it like with Lucifer and it doesn't exist. You will only keep twisting and confusing yourself until you admit your theory's flaws. The same confidence God had in Job when he struck a dare with the Devil. Learn something from the Job, God and Devil saga - "Lucifer(fallen or not) knows God far more than you do, yet He entered a dare with God who knows already what the outcome of a dare will be. Who does that?!Think deep man, think! Lucifer dwells in darkness. He's so driven by negative energy that he doesn't repent of evil. Don't you know he even already knows his end from the apocalypse and the prophets? Why then doesn't he just quit. God dwells in light, he knows all and nothing is hidden from him but has to let things run their course for justice sake. Learn this. If God foreknows future, Lucifer in all his time in heaven would be aware and he won't even accept the dare. However because the account of Job's faithfulness/faithlessness is undefined and nonexistent, Lucifer believed he had a shot.Learn again, Lucifer doesn't know and he has every right to test it as the custodian of the earth. C'mon stop that thing! Ah ah? Moses said he "Know" not"foreknow". Don't try to help Moses claim what he didn't say. Again, do you remember what happened when Moses was only for a while away with God receiving the tablets? What did Israel do? So you see again, that's not foreknowledge. That was Moses' confidence in Israel's infidelity the moment they have no able leader present. For the record, the people did fairly well under Joshua.Dude, define foreknowledge please and my point which you dodged cause you isolated this part was that there are occasions of foreknowledge all over the bible. What about Esau and Jacob, you keep avoiding? What about all prophecy in the bible? Gen16:10 And the angel of the LORD said unto her, I will multiply your seed exceedingly, that it shall not be numbered for multitude.**Facepalm**. Are you really asking this even after quoting the text? Smh. Now, back to my point, it was the angel of YHWH who got to know that Abe feared God above all. God already knew. Again? You said "Infinite means everything possible and more, nothing left out"... Whose definition is this? Ha ha haha As far as I know, infinite means "unquantifiable ". I.e God's knowledge cannot be defined by a finite number.Aren't you always funny? Why is infinity unquantifiable exactly? LMAO! I wonder if you did math? Which laws? State them before you make outrageous claims!My goodness!, Smh over and over. You keep going lower and lower on the scale. You really don't know the laws of nature reflect God's unseen realities? Start reading your bible. Romans 1: 19-20, Hebrews 11:3. Bless your heart. Would it shock you if you don't see Judas in Hell? Let's not go there, the talk is not for today.LMAO! I don't think anything you try now can still shock me. Smiles.... Wherever you don't understand, ask them before you concote blunders in your assessment. My view does not make God evil, even 1%.In other words you still couldn't answer 5b& 5c. Only making claims. Lol. As if those people were saints. They are all of their father the devil, where do you want them to be? In quarantine?And you still couldn't justify 6a or 6b. Just throwing back unrelated questions. In other words, ask to know if you got a person right before you misunderstand him.And you didn't explain what was misunderstood because you still couldn't answer 6c&6d &7. Cool. 8a/ Another poor assessment.From your end, I guess. LMAO! Rasha and ra'ah myth remains nonexistent, even after you declared it. LMAO! From someone who did not interpreted Isaiah45:6 well. Where did I say "God only declares" ?8b/ Did you not read your own post I reproduced? "God only declares according to His good nature exclusive of darkness, death..." Except you wanna change it again. Now justify 8b. Hahahahahahaha I wasn't even the one that brought up the Isa 46:10. Concerning your stance, you can state them. I learned from everyone's stance, I will definitely learn from yours.Right! For people with your kind of ego, we scrutinize such claims. Until you tell us squarely, what you never knew before and got to know, from who on the thread, this seems just superficial false humility. About my stance, you got so excited at your breakthrough revelation, you didn't settle down to soak it all in. Else by now you'd have developed it further and have seen more light. Like I said before, this isn't some to be handled as loosely and shallow as you have hence the contradictions. If you really understood the nitty gritty, you'd know to start from establishing the original divine state, the mystery of triuneness, origin of evil and co. I can't state my stance, it'll have no basis and be misunderstood. These are prerequisites. And your attitude here hasn't been a bit encouraging. You more of want to be right than know the truth. I like engaging objective and critical minds. While on that, tell me why you preach the gospel if only some people are destined to listen according to some sci-fi foreknowledge. Do well to answer that please.The question is invalid as you've attached this stance to me not that I claimed it. Even shade's position I once held easily does justice to this as he already showed you. Have you forgotten that we all have a copy of the same bible?***Facepalm**, smh. First off, try answering 10a and 10b. Second, try expounding on the text, let me even see what you make of it. Third, going to heaven was never about getting saved. They weren't saved when in heaven, they were just where their spirits belonged before they came to earth, remember? Now try answering 10a, 10b and Romans 7:9 exposition. This is how I can guide you into its meaning. Also remember all the other questions I've asked are yet to be defended till date. Your theory still remains very porous plus your cover-up that you aren't being understood is also weak. And tbh, I'm not even seeing any light at the end of our tunnel. You've proven yourself already, you don't concede ever. Your ego depends on it. You'd rather be right than investigate the depths of truth. I see no point of our back and forth. Since you love to believe you've seen the whole light, then keep it. Some people might still gain something from some of your half-truths but you'll ultimately be short-changed. Good luck with that and maybe we could give this a rest. |
Tundetunapaa:It's not your fault bro. There's meant to be sexual education for men in schools but unfortunately there isn't that's why many never master their bodies and make regrettable decisions for that. Flesh and blood brings hunger, thirst, sleep in all animals. In males, it activates libido by sight. It's natural order, none of that should make you feel guilty. It's important to know this if you'll have control of the situation, else you'll think you did wrong and create a defeatist mentality that'll lead you into a mould of failure in managing the situation. You didn't fail with that lady. She was disappointed, right? Well that's cause she's not a male and she'll never understand male physiology. Now unlike animals, we think of the consequences of our actions. Your urges will enslave you and grip you tighter the more you gratify them. This will drastically reduce your productivity in every area of life and lead you to make many foolish decisions. It takes your true masculinity away from you in other words. So a man has to decide that he will fight nature and his own flesh and blood. This of course is not going to be easy but you'll win if you don't quit. The key is in your eyes and thoughts. Everytime you catch yourself falling into the pleasure induced from sight. Snap out of it and immediately begin thinking of the most important things you need to invest your life in and start acting towards it. Now that's a habit you'll build over time and won't be mastered overnight. After a long time of practicing this habit, your brain will register a high for that thought and that endeavour and when you see any sexual triggers rather than seeking sex or a woman, your brain will seek that endeavour instead. mariahAngel:I'm not the one you quoted but yes, it's normal. And It's very wrong too for ladies to come give men advice on their urges. Wtc? What do you know about male physiology? FYI, You would most likely do as the average man if you had male body. |
Is this story for real? The escape to UK with the kids and without the mother part, tho! Can a man even be this enslaved in his own home? |
bloodofthelamb:Thanks. bloodofthelamb:LMAO. Only JWs like Maximus69 and Janosky with all the wisdom they have believe that God had wisdom from time immemorial to create but he had to first create Wisdom(Jesus) to help him create. Confused lots. Their god was either lacking wisdom and hence a foolish god who despite his foolishness was still able to create wisdom that he didn't have or their god is jobless and creating wisdom he already had to help him create. Despicable!Emusan:Thank you guys for saving me stress. I wanted to do exactly this later. These people's beliefs are so irrational and they call those who really believe the bible, irrational. What a commendation from them. LMAO! |
Seems you've lost your cool and are breathing out frustration. Also seems the spirit of religion is lurking. That which turned christianity into a religion because people are not humble enough to admit when a previously held position is insufficient and needing modification. Seems you have only one mission now, to prove for ego sake that you're not wrong, rather than to investigate the truth of the matter. When you cannot give coherent defence to the 9 critiques and yet cannot accept the exposure of obvious flaws in your doctrine, then there's no point even engaging, your ego is at work. Read through your own thread, you've consistently jumped from one stance to another constantly shape-shifting and twisting things until you not only contradict yourself but also make no sense at all and have no ultimate stance. Blabbermouth:Here you make foreknowing and declaring/forthtelling mean the same thing but later you say they're different. 1/ According to you, creation(Lucifer and co) will produce realities alien to God's original state and therefore the end will not be as the beginning since Satan and evil are alien to god's original state of existence? Blabbermouth:This is just Smh, facepalm pathetic. Hear yourself, "God's darkness is still light". You claimed so from Psalm 139:11-12. We torchlighted it in its context and refuted it but you still hold on to the lie asides that it even contradicts your own statement here: Blabbermouth:Next to 2/. 2/ You've changed your stance again. Now, God knows evil you say. Before you said he knows nothing outside his nature which excludes darkness, death, evil which are all the absence of his light essence? Blabbermouth:Smh, someone pls call 911. How low will you go with this. Gen 38:7 And Er, Judah's firstborn, was evil (ra'ah) in the eye of YHWH and YHWH killed him. Gen 6:5 And YHWH saw that the wickedness(ra'ah) of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil(ra'ah) continually. 2/ So God here and all over OT judges people for ra'ah kind of evil but you say it's part of God's nature and it's okay to be evil as long as not 'resha' evil? Don't even get us started on ra'ah else you display your ignorance. I have a million verses to point out your fraud. 3/ So God grows in knowledge and gets to know things he didn't originally know. Your god is a learner? Blabbermouth:LMAO @ the bolded. I had never wanted your "nonsense" claim. Please keep all of it. 3a/So God didn't foreknow Abe will obey him but he foreknew Abe will command his unborn kids to obey him before Abe ever did and even knew they will obey the commandments. Gen 18:19 For I know him, he will command his children and his household after him, and they will guard the way of YHWH, to do justice and judgment, that YHWH may bring on Abraham what he promised. 3b/ Even Moses foreknew Israel will do "ra'ah" evil after he departs, Deut 31:29 and God will punish them? For the record, Gen 22:12. It was an angel, not YHWH himself, who got to know that Abe feared God above all 4/ If your stance is that God updates his knowledge with our actions, then God is not a constant and the end of God is different from his beginning. This is breaking the laws of the universe. Do you agree to this? Blabbermouth:4/ Again, you will keep contradicting yourself to save your ego. You say God has no foreknowledge of our end then turn around and say he has infinite foreknowledge. Infinite means everything possible and more, nothing left out, which is why it can't be increased or reduced, so just quit trying to twist things. Funny you, too if you don't realise that the laws of the universe reveal the invisible qualities of God. You keep avoiding the crux of the matter. You claimed God doesn't know our future or end before we create it. Blabbermouth:5a/You can never get yourself out of the wormhole you put yourself in. Whether anyone's name was tagged to fulfilling this declaration or not. Fact is if God declared, then some man must fulfill and it's God's that has destined this evil inconsistent with his good nature. 5b/ Now again, you say God, from infinite foreknowledge, has gone to zero foreknowledge @ the bolded. 5c/Also going by your logic, God declared all the evil being done on earth by Satan and men, but without attaching any particular name to it. He therefore must be responsible for evil on earth whoever it comes through. Maybe you believe in Isaiah 45:6 in a strange way, afterall, LMAO! No literal names, yes, but you have not answered my question. There are those who are outside the city who are not in the lamb's scroll of life. Blabbermouth:6a/ Smh, give up bro. So if the Lake of fire is not in the city, it is nonexistent? 6b/ and who brought them into existence? Blabbermouth:6b/So you agree God declared these men into existence, yet having declared only according to His solely good nature, his word failed in their life, hence they produced evil instead. God's word can fail? 6c/ If it was God that declared them into existence, then it means his word which declares according to his nature of only good has been overturned by them? God's word has failed then or Blabbermouth:6c&6d/ In other words, no reasonable answer cause you can't justify it. Cool. I wonder when you're gonna stop repeating this mantra of "absence of light" like some new revelation. Blabbermouth:7/ In other words, no answer. Cool. Like I said until you understand God's state of existence, you'll keep getting things mixed up. Blabbermouth:8a/ ra'ah and Rasha myth concocted in your lab busted earlier already. Come up with a valid answer now. 8b/ This is also clearly against your stance concerning predestination which is supposed to only be according to God's solely good nature? Blabbermouth:8b/ Isaiah 45:6 definitely trashed your claim that God only declares consistent with his good/light nature exclusive of any evil/darkness you made below. Blabbermouth:Next to 9/ The point is you used this to strike out God knowing the end from travelling through time to the end, which you labeled foreknowledge, but that he only knows the end from the beginning, i.e. creating it or forthtelling. Blabbermouth:Remember, bro. I'm yet to reveal my stance. Only scrutinizing your 'know-all' claims. And the point is even you are wrong for disbelieving in God's foreknowledge because he only forthtold in Isa 46:10. 10/ As for your stance on the foetuses. You're really kidding, aren't you. Does any foetus go to hell, like during an abortion or a little baby that dies, since these haven't chosen Christ?I hate baseless opinion. Blabbermouth:Smh. I already gave you Romans 7:9. 10a/ But seriously, why not tell us plainly, can a foetus or two year old of an unbeliever go to hell? and if so 10b/ under what conditions. Summary: Your position leaves many gaps, loopholes and contradictions as expected because you've not correctly defined god's original state of existence and still think in normal human terms.You said so. Blabbermouth:Not another lie again, smh! All heretics say same. The word of God doesn't lie like your theory does. If you love the word enough, go reassess yours. Wanna know a secret? There's a little piece in your theory that if tweaked could put it all together but since you're unwilling to admit the current flaws, you'll never find your way into it. I know you'll rather come back with another shape-shifting roll instead. One thing you must learn in our encounter is never again come out like one having the supreme knowledge because in the realm of knowledge, we all are learners and what any of us knows is only a minute fraction of the sum total of knowledge. Humility is an accomplice of knowledge (not false one you came out with questioning everyone as if wanting to learn when all the while, deep down inside, thinking you knew better). |
Cooldude234:If you've really done a thorough investigation and the lady is all you've described - intelligent, a virgin and physically attractive to you, then why are you still playing around? Why not talk about marriage instead? If you're not ready for that, just consider whatever you think you're feeling a mirage and I advise you focus on building your life and worth and forget about ladies for now. Most of these relationships that don't have a definite goal are liabilities that'll cost you valuable time, focus and other resources that could be maximized towards your personal development and achievements. |
Blabbermouth:Blabbermouth, first off, you just gave a long, melodramatic speech that had nothing to do with addressing my outlined assessments of your answers to the nine questions asked and the tenth nor was it even sincere what you did with the word 'evil' used all over OT, just to save your doctrine. As it stands, your obvious contradictions from your 9 answers are still witnessing against you. Second, you've decided for me my stance when I've clearly never declared it. While there is some common points between yours and mine, shadeyinka's position, which I clearly said, I formerly held for a long time, before accepting another, is still more balanced and impeccable than yours. I told you already, this is not a matter you just table out as loosely and prematurely as you have. There are many prerequisites to be settled before this. The original divine state, the origin of light and darkness, the triuneness of God, the real meaning/essence of creation, and much more. I cannot even attempt to present my stance until these heavyweights are properly dealt with and that's why I never showed up on your thread if not being mentioned on it and only questioned you, even though I have longed to do a thread on this and many such long before yours, but for the available time and priority. Your position is one which has been suggested before you were born, yet none offering it has satisfied the many critiques attached to it, just like yourself have not with my critiques but as it stands, is clearly shown to be laden with loopholes, gaps and contradictions. I have achieved my objective with you for now. Go sincerely think about the contradictions and you might arrive at a better and more complete one. The key too, lies in the mysterious original state of God. I'll mention you in my upcoming threads on these, though I know not how soon. |
1/ how Light had to produce a light(lucifer) that produced darkness. Where then did the darkness or its possibility arise from, if its grandparent is Light without darkness. Blabbermouth:1/ According to you, creation will produce realities alien to God's original state and therefore the end will not be as the beginning since Satan and evil are alien to god's original state of existence? 2/ Also what does God then mean by claiming to know good and evil in Genesis 3:22. Blabbermouth:You've changed your stance again. 2/ Now, God knows evil you say. Before you said he knows nothing outside his nature which excludes darkness, death, evil which are simply the absence of his light essence? 3/ after a sinner chooses, does God then know the sinner's present and also his end which according to you isn't part of God's foreknowledge? Blabbermouth:3/ So God grows in knowledge and gets to know things he didn't originally know. Your god is a learner? 4/ If he then knows, has he then updated his knowledge and become more than what he initially was? and yet many other questions. Blabbermouth:4/ If your stance is that God updates his knowledge with our actions, then God is not a constant and the end of God is different from his beginning. This is breaking the laws of the universe. Do you agree to this? 5/ how God predicts the future of both the good and the evil, like Jacob and Esau etc., before they even make their choices. Blabbermouth:You keep avoiding the crux of the matter. You claimed God doesn't know our future or end before we create it. 5a/ How then does he reveal the destiny of Esau and Jacob who had not yet made choices in the womb? 5b/ How does he also tell of Judas Iscariot's destiny , before his birth and his choices, Acts 1:20? 6/ whose names are not in the book of life and why do these people exist since they are not part of God's foreknowledge. Blabbermouth:No literal names, yes, but you have not answered my question. There are those who are outside the city who are not in the lamb's scroll of life. 6a/ Are these people not existing? If so, your stance that anything God didn't forthtell, is nonexistent is false? 6b/ and who brought them into existence? 6c/ If it was God that declared them into existence, then it means his word which declares according to his nature of only good has been overturned by them? God's word has failed then or 6d/ if God created them and none can undo what God does, then how were they able to end up in a reality opposed to God's foreknowledge. 7/ and how they could create a reality that didn't exist in God. Is the end then different from the beginning?Those that believe in future are those who will have an error with this. The end of a point is the same as it's beginning. Blabbermouth:I wonder when you're gonna stop repeating this mantra of absence of light like some new revelation. 7/ You keep contradicting yourself as expected. You said only we and God have the ability to create our end which God doesn't know before it is created. Now these people have created realities and an end against god's. So it means the end is different from the beginning, again. 8/ What is meant in Isaiah 45:7, how God forms light and creates darkness and good and evil. Blabbermouth:Like I said until you understand God's state of existence, you'll keep getting things mixed up. Psa 139:11-12 If I say "surely the darkness will cover me", even night will be light about me. Yes the darkness hides not from you but the night shines as the day. The darkness and the light are both alike to you. Learn not to mix up contexts. The only meaning here is that the darkness is as visible, rather than obscure, to God as light. 8a/ Meaning God knows darkness just as well as he knows light, not that God's darkness is light. This is already against your stance on foreknowledge? Isa 45:7 I form light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I YAHWEH do all these things Here again, it says God creates both all the good and evil, light and darkness. 8b/ This is also clearly against your stance concerning predestination which is supposed to only be according to God's solely good nature? 9/ As for his case with Isaiah 46:10, he ended up just replacing God's forthtelling with foreknowledge which are twodistinct attributes of God and he does both. Forthtelling is how he brings his foreknowledge to play in this movie. Blabbermouth:The point is you used this to strike out God knowing the end from travelling through time to the end, which you labeled foreknowledge, but that he only knows the end from the beginning, i.e. creating it or forthtelling. 9/ Now do you accept that God also has foreknowledge of our end apart from forthtelling? 10/ As for your stance on the foetuses. You're really kidding, aren't you. Does any foetus go to hell, like during an abortion or a little baby that dies, since these haven't chosen Christ? Summary: Your position leaves many gaps, loopholes and contradictions as expected because you've not correctly defined god's original state of existence and still think in normal human terms. |
Meanwhile, let's do a quick one on whether Jesus is angel Michael. Blabbermouth:Well I've done so by comparing parallel scriptures in OT and NT. That will do. Haddeylium avoided my mention the last time. I'm still waiting to see what he will do with #1-#6 |
#5 Creator of Heavens and Earth vs created angels (is Jesus an angel?) Blabbermouth:Blabbermouth, I don't know what more you want me to do. Questions #3 -#9 are clearly outlined in my last post. #1 & #2 are in my second to last post on your thread. If you don't wanna answer the questions #1-#9, cause you can't for now, it's fine. My aim is to show you the loopholes in your theology. So just go on and give it a further thought. Maybe when I open a thread on the subject, we would look at some blind spots. |
#4 WORSHIP OF GOD |



